Abstract
In Czech, German, and many other languages, part of the semantic focus of the utterance can be moved to the left periphery of the clause. The main generalization is that only the leftmost accented part of the semantic focus can be moved. We propose that movement to the left periphery is generally triggered by an unspecific edge feature of C (Chomsky 2008) and its restrictions can be attributed to requirements of cyclic linearization, modifying the theory of cyclic linearization developed by Fox and Pesetsky (2005). The crucial assumption is that structural accent is a direct consequence of being linearized at merge, thus it is indirectly relevant for (locality restrictions on) movement. The absence of structural accent correlates with givenness. Given elements may later receive (topic or contrastive) accents, which accounts for fronting in multiple focus/contrastive topic constructions. Without any additional assumptions, the model can account for movement of pragmatically unmarked elements to the left periphery (‘formal fronting’, Frey 2005). Crucially, the analysis makes no reference at all to concepts of information structure in the syntax, in line with the claim of Chomsky (2008) that UG specifies no direct link between syntax and information structure.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adger, David. 2007. Stress and phasal syntax. Linguistic Analysis 33: 238–266.
Alboiu, Gabriela. 2004. Optionality at the interface: Triggering focus in Romanian. In Triggers, eds. Henk van Riemsdijk and Anne Breitbath, 49–75. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Antinucci, Francesco, and Guglielmo Cinque. 1977. Sull’ordine delle parole in Italiano: l’emarginazione. Studi di Grammatica Italiana 6: 121–146.
Baker, Mark. 2001. The natures of non-configurationality. In Handbook of syntax, eds. Mark Baltin and Chris Collins, 407–438. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bayer, Josef, and Jaklin Kornfilt. 1994. Against scrambling as an instance of move alpha. In Studies on scrambling, eds. Henk van Riemsdijk and Norbert Corver, 17–60. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bošković, Željko. 2002. Clitics as non-branching elements and the Linear Correspondence Axiom. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 329–340.
Bresnan, Joan. 1972. Stress and syntax: A reply. Language 48: 326–342.
Büring, Daniel. 1997. The meaning of topic and Focus. The 59th street bridge accent. London: Routledge.
Büring, Daniel. 2006. Focus projection and default prominence. In The architecture of focus, eds. Valéria Molnár and Susanne Winkler, 321–346. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Büring, Daniel. 2007. Semantics, intonation and information structure. In The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, eds. Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss, 445–474. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2002. Against optional and zero clitics. Right dislocation vs. marginalization. Studia Linguistica 56: 29–57.
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, eds. Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero, and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, 133–166. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A′-dependencies. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Corver, Norbert. 1990. The syntax of left branch extractions. PhD dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit, Brabant.
Cozier, Franz. 2006. The co-occurrence of predicate clefting and wh-phrasess in Trinidad dialectal English. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24 (3): 655–688.
Cruschina, Silvio. 2006. Informational focus in Sicilian and the left periphery. In Phases of interpretation, ed. Mara Frascarelli, 363–385. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
den Dikken, Marcel. 2006. Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Diesing, Molly. 1990. The syntactic roots of semantic partition. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Engels, Eva. 2004. Adverb placement. An optimality theoretic approach. PhD dissertation, Universität Potsdam, Germany.
Epstein, Samuel D., and T. Daniel Seely. 2002. Rule applications as cycles in a level-free syntax. In Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, eds. Samuel D. Epstein and T. Daniel Seely, 65–89. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fanselow, Gisbert. 1993. The return of base generators. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 36: 1–74.
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2001. Features, θ-roles, and free constituent order. Linguistic Inquiry 32 (3): 405–437.
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2002. Quirky subjects and other specifiers. In More than words, eds. Ingrid Kaufmann and Barbara Stiebels, 227–250. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2004. Cyclic phonology-syntax interaction: Movement to first position in German. In Working papers of the SFB 632. Interdisciplinary studies on information structure 1, eds. Shinichiro Ishihara and Michaela Schmitz, 1–42. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2010. Scrambling as formal movement. In Information structure: Contrasts and positions, eds. Ad Neeleman and Ivona Kučerová. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (in press).
Fanselow, Gisbert, and Damir Ćavar. 2002. Distributed deletion. In Theoretical approaches to universals, ed. Artemis Alexiadou, 65–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fanselow, Gisbert, Denisa Lenertová, and Thomas Weskott. 2008. Studies on the acceptability of object movement to Spec, CP. In The discourse potential of underspecified structures, ed. Anita Steube, 413–438. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Féry, Caroline, and Heiner Drenhaus. 2008. Single prosodic phrase sentences. In Working papers of the SFB 632. Interdisciplinary studies on information structure 10, eds. Shinichiro Ishihara, Svetlana Petrova, and Anne Schwarz, 1–44. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.
Féry, Caroline, and Shinichiro Ishihara. 2009. The phonology of Second Occurrence Focus. Journal of Linguistics 45 (2): 285–313.
Féry, Caroline, and Frank Kügler. 2008. Pitch accent scaling on given, new and focused constituents in German. Journal of Phonetics 36 (4): 680–703.
Féry, Caroline, and Vieri Samek-Lodovici. 2006. Focus projection and prosodic prominence in nested foci. Language 82 (1): 131–150.
Fox, Danny, and David Pesetsky. 2005. Cyclic linearization and its interaction with other aspects of grammar. Theoretical Linguistics 31: 235–262.
Franks, Steven, and Tracy H. King. 2000. A handbook of Slavic clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frey, Werner. 2004. A medial topic position for German. Linguistische Berichte 198: 153–190.
Frey, Werner. 2005. Zur Syntax der linken Peripherie im Deutschen. In Deutsche Syntax: Empirie und Theorie, ed. Franz Josef d’Avis, 147–171. Göteborg.
Grewendorf, Günther. 1980. Funktionale Satzperspektive und deutsche Wortstellung. Linguistische Berichte 66: 28–40.
Haider, Hubert. 1981. Empty categories. On some differences between English and German. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 25: 13–36.
Haider, Hubert. 1990. Topicalization and other puzzles of German syntax. In Scrambling and barriers, eds. Günther Grewendorf and Wolfgang Sternefeld, 93–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haider, Hubert, and Inger Rosengren. 2003. Scrambling: Non-triggered chain formation in OV languages. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 15: 203–267.
Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The view from building 20, eds. Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hartmann, Katharina, and Malte Zimmermann. 2007. In place—out of place: Focus in Hausa. In On information structure, meaning and form: Generalizations across languages, eds. Kerstin Schwabe and Susanne Winkler, 365–403. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heck, Fabian. 2004. A theory of pied-piping. PhD dissertation, Universität Tübingen, Germany.
Höhle, Tilman. 1979. ‘Normalbetonung’ und ‘Normale Wortstellung’: eine pragmatische Explikation. Leuvense Bijdragen 66: 385–437.
Holmberg, Anders. 2000. Scandinavian stylistic fronting: How any category can become expletive. Linguistic Inquiry 31 (3): 445–483.
Horn, George. 2003. Idioms, metaphors and syntactic mobility. Journal of Linguistics 39: 245–273.
Horvath, Julia. 2007. Separating focus movement from focus. In Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, eds. Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian, and Wendy K. Wilkins, 108–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2007. Major phrase, focus intonation, multiple spell-out. The Linguistic Review 24 (2–3): 137–167.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Jacobs, Joachim. 1991. Focus ambiguities. Journal of Semantics 8: 1–36.
Jacobs, Joachim. 1996. Bemerkungen zur I-Topikalisierung. Sprache und Pragmatik 41: 1–48.
Jacobs, Joachim. 1999. Informational autonomy. In Focus: Linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives, eds. Peter Bosch and Robert van der Sandt, 56–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan. 2004. The syntax of sentential stress. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto.
Kathol, Andreas. 2001. On the nonexistence of true parasitic gaps in standard German. In Parasitic gaps, eds. Peter W. Culicover and Paul M. Postal, 315–338. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kenesei, István. 1998. Adjuncts and arguments in VP-focus in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 45: 61–88.
Kiss, Katalin É.. 1998. Identificational focus and information focus. Language 74: 245–273.
Kratzer, Angelika, and Elisabeth Selkirk. 2007. Default phrase stress, prosodic phrasing and the spellout edge. The Linguistic Review 24: 93–135.
Krifka, Manfred. 1994. Focus and operator scope in German. In Proceedings of the conference on focus and natural language processing, eds. Peter Bosch and Robert van der Sandt, 133–152. Heidelberg: IBM Scientific Centre.
Krifka, Manfred. 2006. Association with focus phrases. In The architecture of focus, eds. Valéria Molnár and Susanne Winkler, 105–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kučerová, Ivona. 2005. The T-extension condition. In Proceedings of the 24th west coast conference on formal linguistics, eds. John Alderete, Han Chung-hye, and Alexei Kochetov, 227–235. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
Kučerová, Ivona. 2007. The syntax of givenness. PhD dissertation, MIT, Massachusetts.
Kvam, Sigmund. 1983. Linksverschachtelung im Deutschen und Norwegischen: eine kontrastive Untersuchung zur Satzverschränkung und Infinitivverschränkung in der deutschen und norwegischen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Ladd, D. Robert. 1996. Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lenertová, Denisa. 2004. Czech pronominal clitics. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 12: 139–176.
Lenertová, Denisa, and Uwe Junghanns. 2007. Fronted focus exponents with maximal focus interpretation in Czech. In On information structure, meaning and form: Generalizations across languages, eds. Kerstin Schwabe and Susanne Winkler, 347–363. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Meyer, Roland. 2004. Syntax der Ergänzungsfrage: Empirische Untersuchungen am Russischen, Polnischen und Tschechischen. München: Sagner.
Müller, Gereon. 1998. Incomplete category fronting. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
Müller, Gereon. 2004. Verb second as vP first. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 7 (3): 179–234.
Müller, Gereon. 2007. Towards a relativized concept of cyclic linearization. In Interfaces + recursion = language? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax–semantics, eds. Uli Sauerland and Hans-Martin Gärtner, 61–114. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Müller, Gereon, and Wolfgang Sternefeld. 1993. Improper movement and unambiguous binding. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 461–507.
Müller, Gereon, and Wolfgang Sternefeld. 1996. A-bar chain formation and economy. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 480–511.
Müller, Stefan. 2003. Mehrfache Vorfeldbesetzung. Deutsche Sprache 31: 29–62.
Neeleman, Ad, and Kriszta Szendrői. 2004. Superman sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 149–159.
Neeleman, Ad, and Hans van de Koot. 2008. Dutch scrambling and the nature of discourse templates. The Journal of Comparative Germanic linguistics 11 (2): 137–189.
Newman, Paul. 2000. The Hausa language: An encyclopedic reference grammar. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Nunberg, Geoffrey, Ivan Sag, and Thomas Wasow. 1994. Idioms. Language 70: 491–538.
Puig-Waldmüller, Estela. 2006. Wörter stehen da einige. On nominal split constructions in non standard Viennese German. Baccalaureate dissertation, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.
Reich, Ingo. 2003. Frage, Antwort und Fokus. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27: 63–94.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1991. Residual verb second and the wh-criterion. Technical Report 3, Geneva.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left-periphery. In Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax, ed. Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Roberts, Ian. 1993. Verbs and Diachronic Syntax. Reidel: Dordrecht.
Rochemont, Michael. 1986. Focus in generative grammar. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Rooth, Mats. 1996. Focus. In Handbook of contemporary semantic theory, ed. Shalom Lappin, 271–296. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schwarzschild, Roger. 1999. GIVENness, AvoidF and other constraints on the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7 (2): 141–177.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1995. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. In The handbook of phonological theory, ed. John A. Goldsmith, 550–569. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Szendrői, Kriszta. 2001. Focus and the syntax–phonology interface. PhD dissertation, University College London, London.
Svollacchia, Marco, Lunella Mereu, and Annarita Puglielli. 1995. Aspects of discourse configurationality in Somali. In Discourse configurational languages, ed. Katalin É. Kiss, 65–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thiersch, Craig. 1978. Topics in German syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT, Massachusetts.
Toman, Jindřich. 1999. On clitic displacement. In Topics in south Slavic syntax and semantics, eds. Mila Dimitrova-Vulchanova and Lars Hellan, 205–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Travis, Lisa. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. PhD dissertation, MIT, Massachusetts.
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2004. Final lowering in non-final position. Journal of Phonetics 32: 313–348.
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2007. The syntax–phonology interface. In The Cambridge handbook of phonology, ed. Paul de Lacy, 435–456. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Craenenbroek, Jeroen, and Liliane Haegeman. 2007. The Derivation of subject initial V2. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 167–178.
van Hoof, Hanneke, 2003. The rise in the rise–fall contour: Does it evoke a contrastive topic or a contrastive focus? Linguistics 41 (3): 515–563.
Wagner, Michael. 2005. Asymmetries in prosodic domain formation. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49: 329–367.
Wagner, Michael. 2006. Association by movement: evidence from NPI-licensing. Natural Language Semantics 14 (4): 297–324.
Walker, Marilyn, Aravind K. Joshi, and Ellen Prince. 1998. Centering theory in the discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, Edwin. 2003. Representation theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2001. AGREE—The other VP-internal subject hypothesis. In Proceedings of the 20th west coast conference on formal linguistics, eds. Karine Megerdoomian and Leora Ann Bar-el, 635–648. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, focus and word order. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 1997. The morphosyntax of verb movement: A minimalist approach to Dutch syntax. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Fanselow, G., Lenertová, D. Left peripheral focus: mismatches between syntax and information structure. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 29, 169–209 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9109-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9109-x