Abstract
In Part B of this paper, planar collision theories, counterparts of the theory associated with Newton’s hypotheses described in Part A, are developed in connection with Poisson’s and Stronge’s hypotheses. First, expressions for the normal and tangential impulses, the normal and tangential velocities of separation, and the change of the system mechanical energy are written for five types of collision. These together with Routh’s semigraphical method and Coulomb’s coefficient of friction are used to show that the algebraic signs of the four parameters introduced in Part A span the same five cases of system configuration of Part A. For each, α determines the type of collision which once found allows the evaluation of the normal and tangential impulses and ultimately the changes in the motion variables. The analysis of the indicated cases shows that for Poisson’s hypothesis, a solution always exists which is unique, coherent and energy-consistent. The same applies to Stronge’s hypothesis, however, for a narrower range of application. It is thus concluded that Poisson’s hypothesis is superior as compared with Newton’s and Stronge’s hypotheses.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Routh, E.J.: Dynamics of a System of Rigid Bodies, Elementary Part, 7th edn. Dover, New York (1905)
Han, I., Gilmore, B.J.: Impact analysis for multiple-body systems with friction and sliding contact. In: Sathydev, D.P. (ed.) Flexible Assembly Systems, pp. 99–108. New York (1989)
Wang, Y., Mason, M.T.: Two-dimensional rigid-body collision with friction. J. Appl. Mech. 59, 635–642 (1992)
Lankarani, H.M.: A Poisson-based formulation for frictional impact analysis of multibody mechanical systems with open or closed kinematical chains. J. Mech. Design 122, 489–497 (2000)
Poisson, S.D.: Mechanics. Longmans, London (1817)
Brach, R.M.: Friction, restitution, and energy loss in planar collision. J. Appl. Mech. 51, 164–170 (1984)
Keller, J.B.: Impact with Friction. J. Appl. Mech. 53, 1–4 (1986)
Stronge, W.J.: Impact Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
Neimark, J.I., Fufaev, N.A.: Dynamics of Nonholonomic Systems. American Math. Society, Providence (1972)
Ivanov, A.P.: On multiple impact. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 59(6), 887–896 (1995)
Wolfsteiner, P., Pfeiffer, F.: Modeling, simulation, and verification of the transportation process in vibratory feeders. ZAMM Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 80(1), 35–48 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Djerassi, S. Collision with friction; Part B: Poisson’s and Stornge’s hypotheses. Multibody Syst Dyn 21, 55–70 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-008-9127-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-008-9127-1