Abstract
The ornamental Brassica oleracea var. acephala f. tricolor is a good winter and spring foliage plant. Plant architecture is an important agronomic trait of plants, especially for ornamental plants with high ornamental and economic value. In this study, three miniature-related genes, BoDWARF, BoGA20ox and BoSP (SELF-PRUNING), were cloned and their tissue-specific expression patterns were analyzed. The results showed that the three genes were all highly expressed in young leaves and flowers, followed by the lateral roots, seeds and stems. To further achieve the purpose of miniaturization of plants, an RNAi expression vector, jointly targeting BoDWARF, BoGA20ox and BoSP, was constructed and transformed into kale plants. Smaller plant size and slower growth and development speed of flowers and roots were observed in jointly silenced kales. Brassinosteroids and gibberellin contents in leaves and flower buds of transgenic plants were significantly decreased. Furthermore, the expressions of brassinolide-, gibberellin- and flowering-related genes were down-regulated by varying degrees in silenced plants. These results suggest that BoDWARF, BoGA20ox and BoSP play important roles in plant architecture, and that brassinolide and gibberellin are important hormones controlling plant growth and architecture. This miniaturization strategy of kale provides an efficient approach for cultivation of new varieties of ornamental plants and crops.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Plant architecture is an important agronomic trait in plants. For example, dwarfism in cereal crops has a positive influence on crop agronomy by increasing lodging resistance and decreasing the chances of damage due to wind and rain (Cai et al. 2012). For ornamental plants, with high ornamental and economic value, plant architecture is more important. For instance, Miniature Rosa chinensis is a new dwarf variety of the rose family. As its leaves and flowers are small and attractive, it does not occupy as much space, and its placement is easier to choose, it is favored by many people and has become one of the most popular potted flowers on the international flower market. The tomato cultivar Micro-Tom was produced for ornamental purposes by crossing Florida Basket and Ohio 4013-3 cultivars. Micro-Tom displays a very dwarf phenotype with small and red ripened fruits (Scott 1989), and it became a popular potted plant. Recently, this miniature tomato cultivar was also employed as a useful system to investigate fruit ripening and plant development. Thus, breeding miniature plant varieties meets the demand of intensive agriculture and the flower market. Although conventional breeding has made a great contribution to improving traits of plants, it is time-consuming. In recent years, genetic engineering has become an important approach for plant breeding.
Plant growth and development are regulated by both environmental and hormonal signals (Depuydt and Hardtke 2011). Eight principal classes of plant hormones have been characterized: auxin, abscisic acid, brassinosteroids, cytokinins, ethylene, gibberellins, jasmonates and strigolactones (Santner and Estelle 2009; Santner et al. 2009). Based on the phenotype of mutants with disrupted hormone biosynthesis or perception, only cytokinin, auxin, gibberellins and brassinosteroids are considered to be essential for growth (Depuydt and Hardtke 2011). Moreover, brassinosteroids (BRs) and gibberellins (GAs) are inferred to be two major growth-promoting hormones that have similar effects on promoting cell and stem elongation and division (Bai et al. 2012). Brassinosteroids (BRs) are growth-promoting steroid hormones in plants, regulating multiple aspects of physiological responses essential to both vegetative and reproductive development (Kim and Wang 2010; Clouse 2011). After their discovery in the 1970s, an array of experiments over the next decade suggested that these newly discovered plant compounds, with structural similarity to animal steroid hormones, regulate senescence, male fertility, pollen and root development and fruit ripening, and modulate the plant’s response to numerous environmental signals (Mandava 1988). The biochemical definition of the BR biosynthetic pathway and the discovery of BR-deficient and BR-insensitive mutants in Arabidopsis and several crop plants provided convincing evidence that BRs were essential for normal plant development (Fujioka and Yokota 2003; Clouse and Sasse 1998; Bishop 2003, 2007; Altmann 1999). It has been proposed that BRs are synthesized via two parallel pathways, the early and late C-6 oxidation pathways, according to the C-6 oxidation status (Shimada et al. 2001). The tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) DWARF gene encodes a cytochrome P450 protein that has been shown to catalyze the C-6 oxidation of 6-deoxocastasterone to castasterone, which is a key step in the regulation of active BR production; the phenotype of the mutant is dwarf (Bishop et al. 1999). These previous studies have shown that regulating BR biosynthesis or signaling could control the development and height of plants. Gibberellins (GAs) are involved in many developmental processes, including seed germination, stem elongation, leaf expansion, flower, seed and fruit development (Peng et al. 1999; Sasaki et al. 2002). Modification of these processes by application of chemicals that alter the GA content has been common agronomic practice. For example, GA3 was used to stimulate berry growth in seedless grape production (Christodoulou et al. 1968). Inhibitors of GA biosynthesis were used as growth retardants to control the stature of cereals and ornamental pot plants (Hedden and Hoad 1994). GA is one of the most important determinants of plant height (Sasaki et al. 2002; Qiao and Zhao 2011). Dwarfism is often caused by mutations in genes controlling the biosynthesis or signaling pathway of GA. For example, in the 1960s, a high-yielding semi-dwarf variety of rice, IR8, was achieved by introducing a major dwarfing gene (sd-1) that encoded a defective GA20-oxidase (GA20ox) gene (Spielmeyer et al. 2002), which led to the rice “green revolution” (Sui et al. 2012; Sasaki et al. 2002). At the same time, a dominant wheat semi-dwarf cultivar Norin 10 carrying Rht genes facilitated productivity and led to the wheat “green revolution” (Evans 1998). Norin 10 contained the Rht-B1b (formerly called Rht1) and Rht-D1b (formerly called Rht2) alleles that encode a mutant of DELLA protein, a GA signaling repressor (Hedden 2003). These studies demonstrated that controlling GA biosynthesis or signaling was crucial for the production of plants with suitable heights for modern production methods.
Interestingly, in addition to the hormones, the phenotype of Micro-Tom is attributed to the mutation of SELF-PRUNING (SP) gene, which regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1, which maintain the indeterminate status of inflorescence meristems in Antirrhinum and Arabidopsis, respectively (Pnueli et al. 1998; Bradley et al. 1996, 1997; Alvarez et al. 2005). A recessive allele of the SP gene confers accelerated termination of sympodial units in the inflorescence, resulting in limited growth of the shoot as well as a bushy, compact constitution and nearly homogeneous fruit setting (Yeager 1927; Went 1944; MacArthur 1932; Calvert 1965). In wild-type ‘indeterminate’ plants, inflorescences are separated by three vegetative nodes. In ‘determinate’ plants homozygous for the recessive allele of the SP gene, sympodial segments develop progressively fewer nodes until the shoot is terminated by two consecutive inflorescences (Pnueli et al. 1998). The phenotype of the recessive sp gene was one of the most important genetic traits in the development of modern agrotechniques for crop plant because the ‘determinate’ growth habit facilitates mechanical harvesting.
Kales (Brassica oleracea var. acephala f. tricolor) are widely cultivated as ornamental plants and belong to the Brassicaceae family (Zhang et al. 2012). Because numerous round leaves of kale are overlapping, resembling a rose with magenta center and gray–green outer foliage, and the color of leaves develops early and fades late, it is commonly known as “leaf peony”. Its ornamental characteristics are well maintained even at −5 °C conditions (Liu et al. 2012), so it becomes an important flowerbed material in late autumn, winter and early spring of subtropical regions.
In this work, we wanted to obtain miniature kales which occupy a small area and have better ornamental value. From previous studies, we found that BR/GA biosynthesis or signaling genes could affect the height of plants, and the SP/CEN/TFL1 family genes could control the development of inflorescence, which affected the height and proportions of plants. Silencing only one dwarf-related gene may not attain our desired degree of dwarfing, and jointly silencing the combination of genes that have a similar function may achieve better results. Thus, we constructed an RNAi expression vector jointly targeting BoDWARF, BoGA20ox and BoSP, which belong to the BR/GA biosynthesis and SP/CEN/TFL1 family, respectively, and transformed it into kale plants. As we expected, miniaturized kales were obtained. This study provides a theoretical and technical foundation for future molecular breeding of ornamental plants.
Materials and methods
Plant materials and growth conditions
In this study, we used Beijing Red No. 1, a round-leaf kale variety, as the test material. For tissue culture, the kale seeds were washed with 70 % ethanol solution for 1 min and rinsed three times with sterile water, then washed in 1 % sodium hypochlorite solution for 12–15 min, rinsed eight times with sterile water, sowed on 1/2 MS solid agar medium (pH 5.8) under the conditions of illumination intensity of 1,000–2,000 lux 16 h/day, 25 ± 2 °C and 8 h/day of darkness, 18 ± 2 °C. On September 20, 2012, wild-type and transgenic plants with four leaves were transplanted into plastic pots, moved to the experimental field on 25 October, and managed routinely.
Isolation of BoDWARF, BoSP and BoGA20ox gene fragments from kale and sequence analysis
Total RNA of kale was extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Then 1 μg total RNA was used to synthesize first-strand cDNA through reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR; M-MLV reverse transcriptase, Takara, Dalian, China) with Oligo d(T)18 primer (5′ TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT 3′). 1–2 μL cDNA was used to clone the fragments of BoDWARF, BoSP and BoGA20ox genes with primer pairs (BoDWARF-F, BoDWARF-R), (BoSP-F, BoSP-R) and (BoGA20ox-F, BoGA20ox-R) (Table 1S) through high fidelity PCR (Prime STARTM HS DNA polymerase, Takara). The amplified products were tailed using DNA A-Tailing kit (Takara) and linked into pMD18-T vector (Takara). Positive clones were selected via Escherichia coli JM109 transformation and confirmed by sequencing (Invitrogen, Shanghai, China). Multiple sequence alignments were performed by DNAman version 5.2.2. The phylogenic tree was calculated by MEGA (Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis) version 3.1 (Kumar et al. 2004).
Construction of BoDWARF, BoSP and BoGA20ox RNAi vector
In order to silence all three genes simultaneously, we first connected the above three specific gene fragments together: the above plasmid SP::pMD18-T was digested by SalI and EcoRI, then the BoSP gene fragment was purified and ligated into plasmid DWARF::pMD18-T double-digested by XhoI and EcoRI to obtain the recombinant plasmid SP/DF::pMD18-T. The above amplified fragment of BoGA20ox gene was linked into pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega), then digested by SpeI and EcoRI to obtain the BoGA20ox gene fragment, subsequently linked into plasmid SP/DF::pMD18-T double-digested by XbaI and EcoRI to obtain the recombinant plasmid SP/DF/GA20ox::pMD18-T, which includes the BoSP, BoDWARF and BoGA20ox gene fusion fragment. Subsequently, the three-gene fusion fragment was amplified from plasmid SP/DF/GA20ox::pMD18-T with DWARF (F + EX) and GA20ox (F + KB) primers (Table 1S), and double-digested with BamHI/XbaI and KpnI/EcoRI respectively, and linked into pHANNIBAL plasmid at BamHI/XbaI restriction sites in the sense orientation and at KpnI/EcoRI restriction sites in the antisense orientation. Finally, the double-stranded (ds) RNA expression unit, containing the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter, BoDWARF/SP/GA20ox fragment in antisense orientation, PDK intron, BoDWARF/SP/GA20ox fragment in sense orientation and OCS terminator, was purified and linked into the plant binary vector pBIN19 with SacI and XbaI restriction sites.
Plant transformation of BoDWARF/SP/GA20ox RNAi vector
The resulted binary vector was transformed into Agrobacterium LBA4404 strain following the protocols described by Chen et al. (2004). Agrobacterium-mediated transformation was performed as follows: 7–10-day fully expanded (leaves not grown true) bands shank cotyledons were cut and cultured on the pre-culture medium (MS solid medium containing 1 mg/L 6-BA and 1 mg/L 2,4-D, pH 5.8) at 25 ± 2 °C under dark conditions for 48 h, then soaked in Agrobacterium bacteria solution for 15 min. Excess broth was sucked away by sterile absorbent paper, and culture was performed on co-culture medium (MS solid medium containing 1 mg/L 6-BA and 1 mg/L 2,4-D, pH 5.8), at 25 ± 2 °C under dark conditions for 48 h. After washing with sterile water, the explants were transferred to the bud-inducing medium (MS solid medium containing 4 mg/L 6-BA, 2 mg/L ZT, 5 mg/L AgNO3, 500 mg/L Carb and 20 mg/L Kan, pH 5.8), and cultured in conditions of illumination intensity of 1,000–2,000 lux 16 h/day, 25 ± 2 °C and 8 h/day of darkness, 18 ± 2 °C, with the medium replaced every 3 weeks until green shoots grew to 2–3 cm. The shoots were then transferred to rooting medium (1/2 MS solid medium containing 0.2 mg/L NAA, 250 mg/L Carb and 5 mg/L Kan, pH 5.8) and cultured under the same condition of illumination and temperature. The transgenic plants were detected with primers NPTII-F (5′ GAC AAT CGG CTG CTC TGA 3′) and NPTII-R (5′ AAC TCC AGC ATG AGA TCC 3′).
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis
RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis were performed as described above. The synthesized cDNAs were diluted twice with RNase/DNase-free water. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis was carried out using the CFX96™ Real-Time System (C1000™ Thermal Cycler, Bio-Rad). All reactions were performed using the SYBR® Premix Ex Taq II kit (Takara, China) in a 10-μL total sample volume (5.0 μL 2× SYBR Premix Ex Taq, 1.0 μL primers, 1.0 μL cDNA, 3.0 μL ddH2O). To remove the effect of genomic DNA and the template from the environment, NTC (no template control) and NRT (no reverse transcription control) were performed. Three replications for each sample were done and standard curves were run simultaneously. Melting curve analysis of qPCR samples revealed that there was only one product for each gene primer reaction. The PCR products were sequenced to confirm the specific amplification. The expression of ACTIN (Zhang et al. 2012) and other two candidate housekeeping genes, EF-1-α (elongation-factor-1-α) and Apr (adenine phosphoribosyltransferase; Qi et al. 2010), were studied in different tissues of kale. Based on our results shown in Table 2S, BoACTIN gene was used as internal standard in tissues. The primers BoDWARF (RT)-F/BoDWARF (RT)-R, BoSP (RT)-F/BoSP (RT)-R and BoGA20ox (RT)-F/BoGA20ox (RT)-R (Table 1S) were used to determine the expression levels of BoDWARF, BoSP and BoGA20ox in wild-type and transgenic lines. Furthermore, the expression levels of GAs, BRs, auxin and inflorescence-related genes, such as PRE1 (Paclobutrazol-resistant), XTH5 (Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase), TCH4 (For touch, XTH-22), PIF4 (PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTORs), EXP1 (Expansion), IAA3 (A member of the auxin-induced Aux/IAA family), IAA19, SOC1 (SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1) and AP1 (APETALA1), were detected simultaneously. Primers are shown in Table 1S. The calculation method of relative gene expression was 2 (−Delta Delta C(T)).
Measurement of parameters of plant architecture
In order to understand the differences between wild-type and transgenic lines, we measured the height, diameter, internode number and internode length of stem, width and length of mature leaves (4–5 circles from top), internode number, internode length and length of flower bolting, and length of root from wild-type and transgenic plants. Ten mature leaves of each plant were measured for width and length, ten biological repeats of each line were measured for length of root and six biological repeats of each line were measured for other parameters. Speed of bolting and stem growth of wild-type and transgenic lines were also counted. After the start of bolting, the bolting height was measured once every 2 days. For stem growth, stem height was measured 60 days after colonization, once every 10 days.
Quantification of brassinosteroid and gibberellin contents
One-step double-antibody sandwich method enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect the concentration of endogenous BR and GA in mature leaves and flower buds of wild-type and transgenic lines. For BR extraction, 0.5 g sample was ground in a mortar and homogenized in 5 mL extraction solution (isopropyl alcohol). Extracts were centrifuged at 10,000g for 20 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was analyzed by ELISA (Chai et al. 2013). For extraction of GA, 0.5 g sample was ground in an ice-cooled mortar in 5 mL 80 % (v/v) methanol extraction medium. The extract was incubated at 4 °C for 4 h and centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 15 min at the same temperature. The supernatant was also analyzed by ELISA. The BR and GA ELISA experiments were carried out using the same procedure according to the manufacturer’s instructions (http://www.wksubio.com/product/5794959.html). BR and GA contents were measured at 450 nm using a Bio-Rad680 microplate reader. The results are the means of three replicates. The correlation coefficients (R 2) of BR and GA standard curves were 0.997 and 0.991, respectively. The concentration of each sample was calculated from the linear regression equations.
Measurement of chlorophyll contents
One gram of fresh mature leaves was ground to pieces in liquid nitrogen, extracted with 10 mL mixed solution of acetone and ethanol (2:1, v/v) for 48 h in the dark, and centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 645 and 663 nm in a Hitachi UV–vis spectrophotometer using the above-mentioned mixed solution as a blank. Total chlorophyll content was calculated using the formula according to the method of Arnon (1949): Chl (mg/g) = 20.29A645 + 8.02A663. The chlorophyll of each sample was extracted and measured in triplicate.
Statistical analysis
The mean values of data and standard error of the means were calculated from the replicate measurements. Data were analyzed by Origin 8.6 (OriginLab) software, using the t test to assess significant differences between the means.
Results
BoDWARF, BoSP and BoGA20ox isolation and expression pattern analysis in kale
According to the sequences of BoDWARF (Bol032288), BoGA20ox (Bol042237) and BoSP (Bol026421) in Brassica Database (http://brassicadb.org), the three gene fragments were cloned with specific primer pairs (BoDWARF-F, BoDWARF-R), (BoSP-F, BoSP-R) and (BoGA20ox-F, BoGA20ox-R) (Table 1S), and sequenced. Phylogeny and amino acid analysis showed that BoDWARF belonged to a highly conserved cytochrome P450 family (Supplemental Fig. 1a) and had 88.53 % identity with BrDWARF and AtDWARF (Supplemental Fig. 1b); BoGA20ox belonged to the 2OG-Fe(II) oxygenase superfamily [which contains members of the 2-oxoglutarates (2OG) and Fe(II)-dependent oxygenases] (Supplemental Fig. 2a) and shared high identity with BrGA20ox, RsGA20ox (Raphanus sativus) and AtGA20ox (Arabidopsis) (Supplemental Fig. 2b); BoSP belonged to the PEBP (phosphatidyl ethanolamine-binding protein) family (Supplemental Fig. 3a) and had 96.57 % identity with BrSP (Supplemental Fig. 3c).
Quantitative real-time PCR technology was performed to analyze the expression of BoDWARF, BoSP and BoGA20ox. The results showed that these three genes are all highly expressed in young leaf and flower. In case of BoDWARF and BoGA20ox a higher expression with respect to the other tissues is observed also in lateral roots and germinating seeds, tissues undergoing rapid growth. These results suggest that these three genes play important roles in the growth and development of the plant.
Generation of transgenic kale plants
An RNAi construct targeting the specific fragment of BoSP, BoDWARF and BoGA20ox was created and transformed into wild-type plants Beijing Red NO.1 via Agrobacterium-mediated T-DNA transformation. Four independent transgenic lines were confirmed to be positive transgenic lines by PCR analysis using specific primers for the reporter gene NPTII. Quantitative real-time PCR results showed that transcripts of BoSP, BoDWARF and BoGA20ox were reduced by 70–82 % in transgenic lines compared with wild type, and the inhibitory effect of BoDWARF was the highest (Fig. 1d–f).
Transgenic plants show smaller plant architecture
During the process of plant development, transgenic plants displayed a slower growth rate than the wild type, and their size was smaller than the wild type at the same time (Fig. 2a–e, g). To quantify the differences between wild-type and transgenic lines, we measured the height, diameter, internode number and internode length of stems, width and length of mature leaves (4–5 circles from top), and height, internode number and internode length of the flower stalks, respectively. Figure 3 showed that transgenic plants had shorter and thinner stems, smaller leaves and shorter flower stalks.
Transgenic plants exhibit delayed bolting and flowering time and inhibited growth of roots
Under the same conditions, wild-type plants started bolting 120 days after field planting, 7 days later than the transgenic lines (Table 1). The mean time of the first flower of wild type was 134.5 days after field planting, and transgenic lines flowered after about 140–142 days under the same conditions (Table 1). Speed of bolting and stem growth of transgenic lines were also slower than wild type (Fig. 3k, l). To determine whether the development of roots in transgenic lines was affected, we observed the morphology of roots of mature plants. We found that wild-type plants had stronger and more taproots and lateral roots than transgenic lines (Fig. 2e, f).
Gibberellin and brassinosteroid contents in transgenic plants were significantly decreased
In order to explore the underlying reason for the smaller shape of transgenic plants, endogenous gibberellin and brassinosteroid contents were determined in mature leaves and flower buds using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The results showed that the two plant hormone contents were significantly decreased in transgenic plants; in particular the brassinosteroid content declined by half in mature leaves (Fig. 3m, n).
Chlorophyll content in transgenic plants was increased
In our study, transgenic kales had dark-green leaves. Total chlorophyll was extracted from leaf disks. Figure 3o shows that the transgenic lines contained approximately 10–15 % more chlorophyll than the wild type.
Expressions of gibberellin-, brassinosteroid- and flowering-related genes were significantly affected in transgenic plants
To further characterize the molecular mechanism of growth rate and flowering of transgenic plants, a set of GA-, BR- and flowering-related genes were examined. Paclobutrazol-resistant family helix–loop–helix (HLH) factor, PRE1, is induced by GAs and BRs, and promotes cell elongation (Oh et al. 2012; Bai et al. 2012; Lee et al. 2006). The clock-controlled PIF4 encoding a basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) transcription factor plays crucial roles in regulating plant architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana (Oh et al. 2012; Nomoto et al. 2012a, b). Xyloglucan is one of the primary structural components of the plant cell wall. Therefore, the function of XTHs may affect cell shape and plant morphogenesis. TCH4 and XTH5 encoding xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolases, regulated by GAs and BRs, affect the recruitment of cell wall-modifying activity in response to environmental stress and growth (Xu et al. 1995; Campbell and Braam 1998; Iliev et al. 2002). Another plant cell wall expansion protein EXP1, regulated by GAs and BRs, unlocks the network of polysaccharides, permitting turgor-driven cell enlargement (Cosgrove 1998, 2000). In our study, except for XTH5, whose transcript showed a slight decrease in the stem of transgenic lines, the transcripts of PRE1, PIF4, TCH4 and EXP1 were all reduced by approximately half in leaves and stems of transgenic lines (Fig. 4a–e). These results indicated that the decreased expression of cell wall expansion and cell elongation genes in jointly silenced lines might affect plant cell elongation and development. Furthermore, SOC1, a MADS-box protein, plays an essential role in integrating multiple flowering signals to regulate the transition from vegetative to reproductive development (Moon et al. 2003). AP1 is a floral meristem identity gene which is required for the transition of an inflorescence meristem into a floral meristem and is regulated by flowering signal (Mandel et al. 1992; Wilson et al. 1992). The two flowering-related genes were markedly down-regulated in jointly-silenced lines, and their transcripts showed an approximately 50 % decrease in leaves and 40 % decrease in flower buds (Fig. 4f, g). In addition, BR- and auxin-regulated genes IAA3 and IAA19 were also dramatically down-regulated in transgenic lines: IAA3 showed a 40 % decline and IAA19 showed a 60 % decline in transcript level in leaves, and the transcripts of the two genes declined by 25 % in roots (Fig. 4h, i). These results suggested that down-regulated flowering-related and development-related genes in the transgenic lines might affect the growth, root development and flowering of plants.
Discussion
In our study, we focused on miniaturization of ornamental plants. Through transgenic technology, we obtained a smaller plant architecture in ornamental kale. This study indicates that jointly silencing similar dwarfing genes is a feasible method of achieving miniaturization of plants, and lays the theoretical and technical foundation for molecular breeding of miniaturized flowers or ornamental plants in the future.
An optimized transformation system of kale is established
Ornamental kale (Brassica oleracea var. acephala f. tricolor) is an edible, freezing-tolerant and excellent landscape plant for its varied and beautiful leaves. To improve its ornamental traits, transgenic technology has become more effective than traditional breeding methods. To date, many studies on tissue culture of kale have been done (XiuShu et al. 2009; Hosoki et al. 1989; Meng et al. 2005; Zhao et al. 2004), and genetic transformation of kale has also been studied (Cao et al. 2005; Hosoki et al. 1989; Poulsen 1996; De Block et al. 1989; David and Tempé 1988). In previous studies, many cultivars of kale were used, and Walcheria and Andersen have been used as materials. These results indicated that the genotype of kale was an important factor affecting the transformation efficiency. In this study, a new Chinese variety Beijing Red No. 1 was used as the material, and factors affecting the adventitious shoot regeneration in vitro were studied in detail. Different explants of kale were cultured on the media, and we found that, whatever the culture medium, cotyledon with petiole was the best explant. Phytohormone combinations and addition of AgNO3 to the shoot regeneration medium were examined. Hormone combination with 6-BA 4 mg/L + ZT 2 mg/L was the best. The addition of 2 mg/L AgNO3 to the medium could greatly increase the frequency of shoot regeneration. The optimum rooting medium was MS + NAA 0.1 mg/L + Carb 200 mg/L + Kan 5–15 mg/L. The transformation rate was 3.6 %.
Reduction of GA and BR content slowed the growth rate and affected the morphological development of BoSP–BoDWARF–BoGA20ox silenced plants
To date, the functions of GA and BR associated with plant growth and development have been investigated intensively. Gibberellin is mainly concentrated on promoting the extension of stem, germination, seed dormancy, flowering, gender performance, root development, and aging suppression of leaf and fruit (Tyler et al. 2004; Kende and Lang 1964; Olszewski et al. 2002; Fu and Harberd 2003; Groot et al. 1987). In addition, BR plays important regulatory roles in seed dormancy and germination, organ differentiation, vascular tissue development, flowering and senescence, morphogenesis and other various important growth and development processes (Topping et al. 1997; Souter et al. 2002; Schlagnhaufer and Arteca 1985; Diener et al. 2000). The two plant hormones are involved in many aspects of plant growth and development, which necessarily require precise regulation of GA and BR levels in the plant body.
In this study, BoSP–BoDWARF–BoGA20ox-silenced plants showed slower growth speed and smaller size than wild type. To reveal the molecular mechanism of this phenotype, a set of GA- and BR-related genes that mainly focused on promoting cell elongation, such as PRE1, PIF4, TCH4, XTH5 and EXP1, were detected in wild-type and transgenic lines. These genes were all significantly down-regulated in transgenic lines (Fig. 4a–e). In addition, the BR and GA contents of transgenic and wild-type kale plants were determined by ELISA. The two plant hormone contents were markedly decreased in transgenic plants, especially BR content in mature leaves. These results indicate that jointly silencing BoSP, BoDWARF and BoGA20ox in kale reduced the GA and BR levels in the plant, and down-regulated the expression of cell wall expansion and cell elongation genes, subsequently affecting plant cell elongation to produce smaller plants with slower growth speed.
BoSP–BoDWARF–BoGA20ox silencing affected the flowering and root growth and chlorophyll content of the plant
In this study, transgenic plants showed a late flowering phenotype (Fig. 2e, h). In view of previous reports that in Arabidopsis the flowering time of GA-biosynthetic and GA-signaling mutants were highly correlated with the expression level of SOC1, the soc1 null mutant showed reduced sensitivity to GA for flowering, while overexpression of SOC1 restored the non-flowering phenotype of ga1-3, which confirmed that the GA pathway provided a positive factor for SOC1 activation (Moon et al. 2003). Moreover, Arabidopsis mutant dd1 (dwarf and delayed-flowering 1) showed dwarfism and late flowering and was deficient in gibberellin biosynthesis, and the phenotype was restored by exogenous GA3 (Magome et al. 2004). We detected the expression level of this flowering-related gene in the flower buds. The results showed that SOC1 was markedly down-regulated in the jointly-silenced lines, unlike the other flowering-related gene AP1 (Fig. 4f, g). Judging from these results, silencing of the GA-biosynthetic gene GA20ox results in reduced GA content in the flower buds, thereby down-regulating the expression level of SOC1 and AP1, and perhaps eventually leading to delayed flowering of transgenic plants. We also note that many Arabidopsis BR synthesis and signaling pathway mutants showed extension of nutritional growth and delayed flowering time. For instance, under the same growth conditions, BR synthesis mutants det2 (Fujioka et al. 1997), dwf4 (Azpiroz et al. 1998), cpd (Li and Chory 1997) and BR-insensitive mutant bri1 (Domagalska et al. 2007) all showed late-flowering phenotype. Studies have found that the endogenous BR content of the det2 mutant was 10 % that of the wild type, and that cpd, dwf4 and bri1 mutants accumulated different BR precursors in vivo (Szekeres et al. 1996; Azpiroz et al. 1998; Noguchi et al. 1999). These data show that endogenous BR content and change of BR signal transduction were involved in flowering time regulation. Therefore, in our study, delayed flowering of transgenic lines may be due to reduced brassinolide content in the flower buds. In addition, the SELF PRUNING (SP) gene controls the regularity of the vegetative-reproductive switch along the compound shoot of tomato, which is homologous to CENTRORA DIALIS (CEN) from Antirrhinum and TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) from Arabidopsis (Carmel-Goren et al. 2003). SP has no effect on the architecture of inflorescence or on the timing of the first flower. However, by conferring early termination of the vegetative meristems in the sympodial shoot, its overall effect on plant architecture is much more substantial. The mutation of SP leads to the formation of the top flower of plant and miniature tomato phenotype (Martí et al. 2006). Overexpression of SP results in an increasing number of leaves between inflorescences and an increased leafiness of the inflorescence shoot itself (Pnueli et al. 1998). In this study, BoSP is the orthologue of AtTFL, which maintains the growth of stem apical meristem and inhibits the formation of floral meristem (Bradley et al. 1997).
Ectopic expression of TFL1 in Arabidopsis caused both the vegetative and reproductive phases to be greatly extended, and the activity of the floral meristem identity gene APETALA 1, which was not directly inhibited by TFL1, was up-regulated compared to wild-type controls. However, these phenotypic and molecular effects complement those observed in the tfl1 mutant, where all phases are shortened (Ratcliffe et al. 1998). Moreover, studies have shown that TFL1 can indirectly inhibit AP1 gene expression, thereby inhibiting the formation of floral meristem (Ahn et al. 2006; Danilevskaya et al. 2008; Liljegren et al. 1999). According to the above findings, we infer that silencing of the BoSP gene may generate early flowering plants, and thus stop the vegetative growth, finally lead to dwarf plant architecture, but this is opposite to the results we have observed where transgenic plants exhibited a late-flowering phenotype. A possible reason might be that the effect of SP silencing was not very strong, and the two hormones, BR and GA, could delay flowering, thus obscuring the effect of SP gene silencing. The reduced expression of the downstream gene AP1 may be a similar reason. In addition, we observed that transgenic roots were shorter than the wild type (Fig. 2e, f). Previous experiments proved that BR regulates hypocotyl and root growth and development of dicots. The regulation was closely related to polar transport of auxin in the roots (Bao et al. 2004; Xu et al. 2006). BR- and auxin-regulated genes, IAA3 and IAA19, which promote auxin-regulated root development and cell elongation (Nakamura et al. 2003; Vandenbussche et al. 2013), were detected in the transgenic roots. The results showed that the expression levels of the two genes were noticeably lower in joint RNAi lines than in wild type (Fig. 4h, i). These results indicated that reduced BR content in transgenic plants might affect the transport of auxin in roots, thus causing shorter roots. Moreover, jointly silenced kales contained approximately 10–15 % more chlorophyll than wild-type plants (Fig. 3o). This phenotype was observed in GA-insensitive or GA-deficient mutants of Arabidopsis, which had high levels of chlorophyll (Koorneef et al. 1985).
Simultaneous silencing of BoSP, BoDWARF and BoGA20ox genes is an effective way to achieve miniaturization of kale
Currently, dwarfing genes are concentrated in the GA, BR, auxin biosynthesis and signal transduction, and light signaling pathways (Ross et al. 2001; Yin et al. 2007). Genes of cytokinins and ethylene synthesis and signaling pathways (De Grauwe et al. 2005) may also become important factors for research into ornamental plant miniaturization. Moreover, cell wall synthesis and metabolism, temperature and other environmental factors, DNA methylation (Finnegan et al. 1996), microRNA (Achard et al. 2004) and transcription factors are important regulatory elements for plant growth and development. In this study, BR/GA biosynthesis genes, BoDWARF and BoGA20ox, and the flowering-related gene BoSP, were selected to construct an RNAi vector. Through transgenic technology, simultaneously silenced kale plants were produced and exhibited a dwarf phenotype. This result indicates that jointly silencing BoSP, BoDWARF and BoGA20ox genes is a feasible method to miniaturize kale plants.
References
Achard P, Herr A, Baulcombe DC, Harberd NP (2004) Modulation of floral development by a giMicroRNAn-regulated microRNA. Sci Signal 131(14):3357
Ahn JH, Miller D, Winter VJ, Banfield MJ, Lee JH, Yoo SY, Henz SR, Brady RL, Weigel D (2006) A divergent external loop confers antagonistic activity on floral regulators FT and TFL1. EMBO J 25(3):605–614
Altmann T (1999) Molecular physiology of brassinosteroids revealed by the analysis of mutants. Planta 208(1):1–11
Alvarez J, Guli CL, Yu XH, Smyth DR (2005) Terminal flower: a gene affecting inflorescence development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 2(1):103–116
Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24(1):1
Azpiroz R, Wu Y, LoCascio JC, Feldmann KA (1998) An Arabidopsis brassinosteroid-dependent mutant is blocked in cell elongation. Plant Cell Online 10(2):219–230
Bai M-Y, Shang J-X, Oh E, Fan M, Bai Y, Zentella R, Sun T, Wang Z-Y (2012) Brassinosteroid, gibberellin and phytochrome impinge on a common transcription module in Arabidopsis. Nat Cell Biol 14(8):810–817
Bao F, Shen J, Brady SR, Muday GK, Asami T, Yang Z (2004) Brassinosteroids interact with auxin to promote lateral root development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 134(4):1624–1631
Bishop G (2003) Brassinosteroid mutants of crops. J Plant Growth Regul 22(4):325–335
Bishop GJ (2007) Refining the plant steroid hormone biosynthesis pathway. Trends Plant Sci 12(9):377–380
Bishop GJ, Nomura T, Yokota T, Harrison K, Noguchi T, Fujioka S, Takatsuto S, Jones JD, Kamiya Y (1999) The tomato DWARF enzyme catalyses C-6 oxidation in brassinosteroid biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(4):1761–1766
Bradley D, Carpenter R, Copsey L, Vincent C, Rothstein S, Coen E (1996) Control of inflorescence architecture in Antirrhinum. Nature 379:791–797
Bradley D, Ratcliffe O, Vincent C, Carpenter R, Coen E (1997) Inflorescence commitment and architecture in Arabidopsis. Science 275(5296):80–83
Cai P, Long H, Deng G, Pan Z, Peng Z, Yu M (2012) Molecular cloning, characterization, and expression analysis of genes encoding gibberellin 20-oxidase in Dasypyrum villosum dwarf mutant. Plant Mol Biol Rep 30(5):1110–1116
Calvert A (1965) Flower initiation and development in the tomato. Natl Agric Advis Serv Q Rev 70:79–88
Campbell P, Braam J (1998) Co-and/or post-translational modifications are critical for TCH4 XET activity. Plant J 15(4):553–561
Cao J, Shelton A, Earle E (2005) Development of transgenic collards (Brassica oleracea L., var. acephala) expressing a cry1Ac or cry1C Bt gene for control of the diamondback moth. Crop Prot 24(9):804–813
Carmel-Goren L, Liu YS, Lifschitz E, Zamir D (2003) The SELF-PRUNING gene family in tomato. Plant Mol Biol 52(6):1215–1222
Chai Y-m, Zhang Q, Tian L, Li C-L, Xing Y, Qin L, Shen Y–Y (2013) Brassinosteroid is involved in strawberry fruit ripening. Plant Growth Regul 69(1):63–69
Chen G, Hackett R, Walker D, Taylor A, Lin Z, Grierson D (2004) Identification of a specific isoform of tomato lipoxygenase (TomloxC) involved in the generation of fatty acid-derived flavor compounds. Plant Physiol 136(1):2641–2651
Christodoulou A, Weaver R, Pool R (1968) Relation of gibberellin treatment to fruit-set, berry development, and cluster compactness in Vitis vinifera grapes. In: Proceedings of American Soc. Hort. Sci, pp 301–310
Clouse SD (2011) Brassinosteroid signal transduction: from receptor kinase activation to transcriptional networks regulating plant development. Plant Cell Online 23(4):1219–1230
Clouse SD, Sasse JM (1998) Brassinosteroids: essential regulators of plant growth and development. Annu Rev Plant Biol 49(1):427–451
Cosgrove DJ (1998) Cell wall loosening by expansins. Plant Physiol 118(2):333–339
Cosgrove DJ (2000) Loosening of plant cell walls by expansins. Nature 407(6802):321–326
Danilevskaya ON, Meng X, Hou Z, Ananiev EV, Simmons CR (2008) A genomic and expression compendium of the expanded PEBP gene family from maize. Plant Physiol 146(1):250–264
David C, Tempé J (1988) Genetic transformation of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) by Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Plant Cell Rep 7(2):88–91
De Block M, De Brouwer D, Tenning P (1989) Transformation of Brassica napus and Brassica oleracea using agrobacterium tumefaciens and the expression of the bar and neo genes in the transgenic plants. Plant Physiol 91(2):694–701
De Grauwe L, Vandenbussche F, Tietz O, Palme K, Van Der Straeten D (2005) Auxin, ethylene and brassinosteroids: tripartite control of growth in the Arabidopsis hypocotyl. Plant Cell Physiol 46(6):827–836
Depuydt S, Hardtke CS (2011) Hormone signalling crosstalk in plant growth regulation. Curr Biol 21(9):R365–R373
Diener AC, Li H, Zhou W, Whoriskey WJ, Nes WD, Fink GR (2000) Sterol methyltransferase 1 controls the level of cholesterol in plants. Plant Cell Online 12(6):853–870
Domagalska MA, Schomburg FM, Amasino RM, Vierstra RD, Nagy F, Davis SJ (2007) Attenuation of brassinosteroid signaling enhances FLC expression and delays flowering. Development 134(15):2841–2850
Evans LT (1998) Feeding the ten billion: plants and population growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Finnegan EJ, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES (1996) Reduced DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana results in abnormal plant development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93(16):8449–8454
Fu X, Harberd NP (2003) Auxin promotes Arabidopsis root growth by modulating gibberellin response. Nature 421(6924):740–743
Fujioka S, Li J, Choi Y-H, Seto H, Takatsuto S, Noguchi T, Watanabe T, Kuriyama H, Yokota T, Chory J (1997) The Arabidopsis deetiolated 2 mutant is blocked early in brassinosteroid biosynthesis. Plant Cell Online 9(11):1951–1962
Fujioka S, Yokota T (2003) Biosynthesis and metabolism of brassinosteroids. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54(1):137–164
Groot SP, Bruinsma J, Karssen CM (1987) The role of endogenous gibberellin in seed and fruit development of tomato: studies with a gibberellin-deficient mutant. Physiol Plant 71(2):184–190
Hedden P (2003) The genes of the green revolution. Trends Genet 19(1):5–9
Hedden P, Hoad GV (1994) Growth regulators and crop productivity. Marcel Dekker, New York
Hosoki T, Shiraishi K, Kigo T, Ando M (1989) Transformation and regeneration of ornamental kale (Brassica oleracea var. acephala DC) mediated by Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Sci Hortic 40(3):259–266
Iliev EA, Xu W, Polisensky DH, Oh M-H, Torisky RS, Clouse SD, Braam J (2002) Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of Arabidopsis TCH4 expression by diverse stimuli. Roles of cis regions and brassinosteroids. Plant Physiol 130(2):770–783
Kende H, Lang A (1964) Gibberellins and light inhibition of stem growth in peas. Plant Physiol 39(3):435
Kim T-W, Wang Z-Y (2010) Brassinosteroid signal transduction from receptor kinases to transcription factors. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:681–704
Koorneef M, Elgersma A, Hanhart C, Loenen-Martinet E, Rijn L, Zeevaart J (1985) A gibberellin insensitive mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol Plant 65(1):33–39
Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004) MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5(2):150–163
Lee S, Lee S, Yang K-Y, Kim Y-M, Park S-Y, Kim SY, Soh M-S (2006) Overexpression of PRE1 and its homologous genes activates gibberellin-dependent responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol 47(5):591–600
Li J, Chory J (1997) A putative leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase involved in brassinosteroid signal transduction. Cell 90(5):929–938
Liljegren SJ, Gustafson-Brown C, Pinyopich A, Ditta GS, Yanofsky MF (1999) Interactions among APETALA1, LEAFY, and TERMINAL FLOWER1 specify meristem fate. Plant Cell Online 11(6):1007–1018
Liu F, Han S, Zhang Y, Wang G, Lu K, Zong M, Si Y (2012) A new ornamental cabbage hybrid ‘Beijing Peony Red 2’. Acta Hortic Sin 39:401–402
MacArthur JW (1932) Inherited characters in the tomato 1. The self-pruning habit. J Hered 23(10):395–396
Magome H, Yamaguchi S, Hanada A, Kamiya Y, Oda K (2004) Dwarf and delayed-flowering 1, a novel Arabidopsis mutant deficient in gibberellin biosynthesis because of overexpression of a putative AP2 transcription factor. Plant J 37(5):720–729
Mandava NB (1988) Plant growth-promoting brassinosteroids. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 39(1):23–52
Mandel MA, Gustafson-Brown C, Savidge B, Yanofsky MF (1992) Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Nature 360(6401):273–277
Martí E, Gisbert C, Bishop GJ, Dixon MS, García-Martínez JL (2006) Genetic and physiological characterization of tomato cv. Micro-Tom. J Exp Bot 57(9):2037–2047
Meng Z, Xu D, Wang J (2005) Tissue culture of ornamental kale. J Wuhan Univ (Natural Science Edition) S2 51:273–277
Moon J, Suh SS, Lee H, Choi KR, Hong CB, Paek NC, Kim SG, Lee I (2003) The SOC1 MADS-box gene integrates vernalization and gibberellin signals for flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant J 35(5):613–623
Nakamura A, Higuchi K, Goda H, Fujiwara MT, Sawa S, Koshiba T, Shimada Y, Yoshida S (2003) Brassinolide induces IAA5, IAA19, and DR5, a synthetic auxin response element in Arabidopsis, implying a cross talk point of brassinosteroid and auxin signaling. Plant Physiol 133(4):1843–1853
Noguchi T, Fujioka S, Choe S, Takatsuto S, Yoshida S, Yuan H, Feldmann KA, Tax FE (1999) Brassinosteroid-insensitive dwarf mutants of Arabidopsis accumulate brassinosteroids. Plant Physiol 121(3):743–752
Nomoto Y, Kubozono S, Miyachi M, Yamashino T, Nakamichi N, Mizuno T (2012a) A circadian clock-and PIF4-mediated double coincidence mechanism is implicated in the thermosensitive photoperiodic control of plant architectures in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol 53(11):1965–1973
Nomoto Y, Kubozono S, Yamashino T, Nakamichi N, Mizuno T (2012b) Circadian clock- and PIF4-controlled plant growth: a coincidence mechanism directly integrates a hormone signaling network into the photoperiodic control of plant architectures in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol 53(11):1950–1964
Oh E, Zhu J-Y, Wang Z-Y (2012) Interaction between BZR1 and PIF4 integrates brassinosteroid and environmental responses. Nat Cell Biol 14(8):802–809
Olszewski N, Sun T, Gubler F (2002) Gibberellin signaling biosynthesis, catabolism, and response pathways. Plant Cell Online 14(Suppl 1):S61–S80
Peng J, Richards DE, Hartley NM, Murphy GP, Devos KM, Flintham JE, Beales J, Fish LJ, Worland AJ, Pelica F (1999) ‘Green revolution’ genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators. Nature 400(6741):256–261
Pnueli L, Carmel-Goren L, Hareven D, Gutfinger T, Alvarez J, Ganal M, Zamir D, Lifschitz E (1998) The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development 125(11):1979–1989
Poulsen G (1996) Genetic transformation of Brassica. Plant Breed 115(4):209–225
Qi J, Yu S, Zhang F, Shen X, Zhao X, Yu Y, Zhang D (2010) Reference gene selection for real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction of mRNA transcript levels in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). Plant Mol Biol Rep 28(4):597–604
Qiao F, Zhao K-J (2011) The influence of RNAi targeting of OsGA20ox2 gene on plant height in rice. Plant Mol Biol Rep 29(4):952–960
Ratcliffe OJ, Amaya I, Vincent CA, Rothstein S, Carpenter R, Coen ES, Bradley DJ (1998) A common mechanism controls the life cycle and architecture of plants. Development 125(9):1609–1615
Ross JJ, O’Neill DP, Wolbang CM, Symons GM, Reid JB (2001) Auxin-gibberellin interactions and their role in plant growth. J Plant Growth Regul 20(4):336–353
Santner A, Calderon-Villalobos LIA, Estelle M (2009) Plant hormones are versatile chemical regulators of plant growth. Nat Chem Biol 5(5):301–307
Santner A, Estelle M (2009) Recent advances and emerging trends in plant hormone signalling. Nature 459(7250):1071–1078
Sasaki A, Ashikari M, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Itoh H, Nishimura A, Swapan D, Ishiyama K, Saito T, Kobayashi M, Khush G (2002) Green revolution: a mutant gibberellin-synthesis gene in rice. Nature 416(6882):701–702
Schlagnhaufer CD, Arteca RN (1985) Brassinosteroid-induced epinasty in tomato plants. Plant Physiol 78(2):300–303
Scott JW (1989) Micro-Tom—a miniature dwarf tomato. Florida Agric Exp Stn Circ 370:1–6
Shimada Y, Fujioka S, Miyauchi N, Kushiro M, Takatsuto S, Nomura T, Yokota T, Kamiya Y, Bishop GJ, Yoshida S (2001) Brassinosteroid-6-oxidases from Arabidopsis and tomato catalyze multiple C-6 oxidations in brassinosteroid biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 126(2):770–779
Souter M, Topping J, Pullen M, Friml J, Palme K, Hackett R, Grierson D, Lindsey K (2002) Hydra mutants of Arabidopsis are defective in sterol profiles and auxin and ethylene signaling. Plant Cell Online 14(5):1017–1031
Spielmeyer W, Ellis MH, Chandler PM (2002) Semidwarf (sd-1), “green revolution” rice, contains a defective gibberellin 20-oxidase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(13):9043–9048
Sui J-M, Guo B-T, Wang J-S, Qiao L-X, Zhou Y, Zhang H-G, Gu M-H, Liang G-H (2012) A new GA-insensitive semidwarf mutant of rice (Oryza sativa L.) with a missense mutation in the SDG gene. Plant Mol Biol Rep 30(1):187–194
Szekeres M, Németh K, Koncz-Kálmán Z, Mathur J, Kauschmann A, Altmann T, Rédei GP, Nagy F, Schell J, Koncz C (1996) Brassinosteroids rescue the deficiency of CYP90, a cytochrome P450, controlling cell elongation and de-etiolation in Arabidopsis. Cell 85(2):171–182
Topping JF, May VJ, Muskett PR, Lindsey K (1997) Mutations in the HYDRA1 gene of Arabidopsis perturb cell shape and disrupt embryonic and seedling morphogenesis. Development 124(21):4415–4424
Tyler L, Thomas SG, Hu J, Dill A, Alonso JM, Ecker JR, Sun T (2004) DELLA proteins and gibberellin-regulated seed germination and floral development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 135(2):1008–1019
Vandenbussche F, Callebert P, Zadnikova P, Benkova E, Van Der Straeten D (2013) Brassinosteroid control of shoot gravitropism interacts with ethylene and depends on auxin signaling components. Am J Bot 100(1):215–225
Went F (1944) Morphological observations on the tomato plant. Bull Torrey Bot Club 71(1):77–92
Wilson RN, Heckman JW, Somerville CR (1992) Gibberellin is required for flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana under short days. Plant Physiol 100(1):403–408
XiuShu Z, MingYang L, WenLing Z, Fan L (2009) Establishment of high adventitious shoot regeneration system of ornamental kale. Genomics Appl Biol 28(1):141–148
Xu J, Hofhuis H, Heidstra R, Sauer M, Friml J, Scheres B (2006) A molecular framework for plant regeneration. Sci Signal 311(5759):385
Xu W, Purugganan MM, Polisensky DH, Antosiewicz DM, Fry SC, Braam J (1995) Arabidopsis TCH4, regulated by hormones and the environment, encodes a xyloglucan endotransglycosylase. Plant Cell Online 7(10):1555–1567
Yeager A (1927) Determinate growth in the tomato. J Hered 18(6):263–265
Yin C, Gan L, Ng D, Zhou X, Xia K (2007) Decreased panicle-derived indole-3-acetic acid reduces gibberellin level in the uppermost internode, causing panicle enclosure in male sterile rice Zhenshan 97A. J Exp Bot 58(10):2441–2449
Zhang B, Hu Z, Zhang Y, Li Y, Zhou S, Chen G (2012) A putative functional MYB transcription factor induced by low temperature regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis in purple kale (Brassica oleracea var. acephala f. tricolor). Plant Cell Rep 31(2):281–289
Zhao J, Lu B, Zhao M (2004) Plant regeneration from cotyledons of Chinese cabbage cultured in vitro. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin 2:005
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31171968) and Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing of China (No. cstc, 2011BB1068), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. CDJXS11232244).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
11032_2014_20_MOESM3_ESM.tif
Supplemental Fig. 1 Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis of BoDWARF and other cytochrome P450 family proteins. a. Multiple sequence alignment of BoDWARF and other cytochrome P450 family proteins. BoDWARF is marked with an asterisk. Identical amino acids are shaded in black, and similar amino acids are shaded in gray. b. Phylogenetic analysis of BoDWARF and other proteins were constructed by the neighbor-joining method, bootstrap analysis of 1000 replicates. BoDWARF is marked with an asterisk. Accession numbers and corresponding references for the proteins listed are as follows: SlDWARF (NM_001247334.1), AtDWARF (NP_566852.1), NtDWARF (XP_002330918.1), GmDWARF (XP_003554965.1), VvDWARF (ABB60086.1), ZmDWARF (AET06165.1), BoDWARF (Bol032288), CsDWARF (XP_004141472.1), BrDWARF (Bra020747). (TIFF 582 kb)
11032_2014_20_MOESM4_ESM.tif
Supplemental Fig. 2 Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis of BoGA20ox and other GA20ox proteins. a. Multiple sequence alignment of BoGA20ox and other GA20ox proteins. BoGA20ox is marked with an asterisk. Identical amino acids are shaded in black, and similar amino acids are shaded in gray. b. Phylogenetic analysis of BoGA20ox and other GA20ox proteins were constructed by the neighbor-joining method, bootstrap analysis of 1000 replicates. BoGA20ox is marked with an asterisk. Accession numbers and corresponding references for the proteins listed are as follows: AtGA20ox (NM_118674.4), BoGA20ox (Bol042237), BrGA20ox (Bra013890), RsGA20ox (BAM73279.1), ZmGA20ox (NM_001254854.1), SlGA20ox (NM_001247141.1), PtGA20ox (JX305461.1). (TIFF 398 kb)
11032_2014_20_MOESM5_ESM.tif
Supplemental Fig. 3 Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis of BoSP and other PEBP family proteins. a. Multiple sequence alignment of BoSP and other PEBP family proteins. BoSP is marked with an asterisk. Identical amino acids are shaded in black, and similar amino acids are shaded in gray. b. Phylogenetic analysis of the BoSP and other proteins were constructed by the neighbor-joining method, bootstrap analysis of 1000 replicates. BoSP is marked with an asterisk. Accession numbers and corresponding references for the proteins listed are as follows: AtTFL1 (U77674.1), BoSP (Bol026421), BrSP (Bra000506), SlSP (NM_001247045), AmCEN (S81193), CaSP (CAI38702), OsSP (NP_001173006), GhTF1 (ABW24963), ZmZCN2 (NP_001106241), GM-CEN like3 (ACU00129), VvTFL1a (XP_002276820), ScPEBP1 (1WPX_B), MmPEBP1 (AAG25635), HsPEBP1 (NP_002558). (TIFF 533 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, Q., Chen, G., Chen, X. et al. Jointly silencing BoDWARF, BoGA20ox and BoSP (SELF-PRUNING) produces a novel miniature ornamental Brassica oleracea var. acephala f. tricolor variety. Mol Breeding 34, 99–113 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-014-0020-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-014-0020-8