Introduction

In the kidney, ischemic injury leads to acute renal failure (ARF). Although renal function after episodes of ARF is thought to be restored, initial ischemic injury is associated with high morbidity and mortality [1]. Thus, great efforts have been taken to prevent ischemic renal injury, and the currently employed strategy is ischemic preconditioning, which can stimulate the endogenous cell protection mechanisms against renal ischemic reperfusion injury (IRI) [2]. Unfortunately, ischemia preconditioning cannot be widely used in the clinic, so pharmacological approaches that improve the ability of the kidney to tolerate ischemia and hypoxia would be more reasonable and practical [3].

Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) is the master regulator of a variety of processes during the adaptation to hypoxia. HIF is a heterodimer consisting of an oxygen-sensitive α-subunit HIF-α and a constitutively expressed β-subunit HIF-β [4]. Under a normoxia condition, the HIF-α subunit is hydroxylated by specific prolyl hydroxylases (PHD) and is rapidly degraded via the ubiquitin-proteasomal system. In a hypoxic environment, PHD-mediated hydroxylation is inhibited, leading to the accumulation of HIF-α in the nucleus, where it dimerizes with HIF-β to drive the transcription of target genes [57]. HIF regulates the expression of more than 100 genes, including erythropoietin (EPO), heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), glucose transporter-1 (Glut-1), and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), which control a variety of adaptive response to hypoxia, such as vasodilation, energy metabolism, glucose uptake, angiogenesis, erythropoiesis, cell viability, proliferation, and differentiation [8, 9].

PHD inhibitor has been shown to attenuate ischemic injury in many organs, including the kidney, heart, and brain [1012], but the potential mechanism is still ambiguous. In this study, we aim to investigate the possible role of PHD inhibitor dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG) in inducing delayed preconditioning-like effects against IRI. Specifically, we also identified the potential role of iNOS in ameliorating postischemic renal injury afforded by HIF-1α activation.

Materials and methods

Animals and grouping

Male C57BL/6 mice (weight from 22 to 26 g) were supplied by the Experimental Animal Center of Fudan University and randomized into the following 4 experimental groups: the sham group (n = 6), which received renal pedicles isolation alone; the IRI group (n = 6), which received 0.9% saline (ip) 24 h before IRI; the DMOG group (n = 6), which was pretreated with DMOG (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI) (dissolved in 0.9% saline, ip) at a dose of 40 mg/kg 24 h before IRI; and the GW274150+DMOG group (n = 6), which received DMOG (40 mg/kg ip) 24 h before IRI followed by treatment with specific iNOS inhibitor GW274150 (Enzo Life Sciences International, PA) (10 mg/kg ip) 30 min before IRI. Animals were subjected to renal IRI as described below. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care Use Committee of Shanghai (No. SYXK [Hu] 2007-0002).

Renal IRI

Animals were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg ip) and then subjected to bilateral warm ischemic injury by simultaneous clamping of both renal pedicles with nontraumatic microvascular clamps for 30 min. Body temperature was maintained by placing mice on the heat pad during the surgery. After reperfusion for 24 h, blood samples and kidneys were collected. Sham-operated animals underwent the same anesthesia, laparotomy, and renal pedicles isolation as ischemic mice.

Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine (Scr) measurement

BUN and Scr were measured by an enzymatic method with a commercial kit (Sysmex, Shanghai, China) on a HITACHI 7170A automatic biochemical analyzer (Hitachi, Shanghai, China).

Histological examination

Paraffin-embedded kidney sections (4 μm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Morphological assessment was performed by an experienced renal pathologist, who was blind to the treatment groups. More than 10 high-power fields (magnification ×400) including both cortex and outer medulla were randomly selected. A grading scale of 0–4, as outlined by Jablonski et al. [13], was used for the histopathological assessment of ischemia and reperfusion-induced damage of the proximal tubules.

Immunocytochemistry

Formalin-fixed kidney sections (4 μm) were de-paraffinized in xylene and rehydrated through a graded ethanol series to water. After blocking with 10% normal horse serum in PBS, the slides were stained for vimentin in sequential incubation with mouse monoclonal antibody (clone V9; Dako, Carpinteria, CA), biotin-conjugated secondary antibody, and avidin–biotin peroxidase complex (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA). Integral optical density of the vimentin-positive area in the tubulointerstitium was quantitatively measured by counting 20 randomly selected high-power fields (HPF, 400×) per section in the outer medulla. All quantification was performed in a blinded manner.

Detection of apoptotic cells

Formaldehyde-fixed paraffin sections were de-paraffinized, rehydrated, and incubated with proteinase K, and endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched. In situ labeling of fragmented DNA was performed with TUNEL staining with a commercially available in situ cell death detection kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The number of TUNEL-positive cells in each section was calculated by counting the number of positive cells in 20 randomly selected fields of the entire sample. Quantification was made by a renal pathologist in a blind manner.

Real-time PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from kidney using Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized with a SuperScript first strand synthesis kit (Invitrogen) following the protocol supplied, and 1 μg cDNA was used for real-time PCR (Roche Diagnostics) utilizing SYBR Green PCR reagent (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) with the primers as follows: β-actin 5′-CCTCTATGCCAACACAGTGC-3′, 5′-GTACTCCTGCTTGCTGATCC-3′; iNOS 5′-TTGGAGCGAGTTGTGGATTG-3′, 5′-GTGAGGGCTTGGCTGAGTGA-3′; EPO 5′-AAAAGAATGGAGGTGGAAGAAC-3′, 5′-TACCCGAAGCAGTGAAGTGAG-3′; HO-1 5′-ACAGATGGCGTCACTTCGTC-3′, 5′-AGGCAAGATTCTCCCTTACAG-3′. After denaturation at 95°C for 15 min, the PCR samples were cycled 40 times at 95°C for 10 s, 58°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 20 s. All reactions were performed in triplicate. For quantitative analysis, iNOS, EPO, and HO-1 mRNA levels were normalized to the level of β-actin as the internal control.

Protein isolation and western blot

Preparation of nuclear extract

Kidney tissue (100 mg) was homogenized using polytron homogenizer (Fluko, Shanghai, China) in 200 μL ice-cold homogenization buffer (10 mmol/L Hepes, pH 7.9, 2 mmol/L MgCl2 0.1 mmol/L EDTA, and 10% NP-40) with a cocktail of protease inhibitors (Roche Diagnostics). The mixture was vortexed 10 times for 1 min each and was centrifuged at 12,000g for 30 min at 4°C. The pellet was lysed in 60 μL ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mmol/L Hepes, 10% glycerol, 300 mmol/L NaCl, and 50 mmol/L KCl) with a cocktail of protease inhibitors and vortexed vigorously five times for 2 min each, and the mixture was centrifuged at 12,000g for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatant was taken as nuclear extract, which was diluted to a standard concentration of 3 μg/μL and stored in aliquots at −70°C. The protein concentration was determined by Bradford method (BioRad protein assay; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA).

Immunoblotting analysis

Total cell lysate was extracted using RIPA lysis buffer. About 100 μg nuclear extract or cell lysate was separated on SDS–polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane. Membranes were stained with Ponceau S solution (0.2% w/v in 1% acetic acid; Sigma-Aldrich) to verify equal protein loading and transfer and then blotted with HIF-1α antibody (clone α67; Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO), iNOS antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), or actin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich). The membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch) and developed using ECL kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL) and exposed to X-ray film. Bands on X-ray films were quantified with Image plus 5.1 software.

Statistical analysis

Data were presented as mean ± SD. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the least significant difference (LSD) method was used to determine differences among more than two groups for all continuous parameters while Student’s t test was used for two-group data. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS13.0 software, and P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Stabilization and activation of HIF-1α in mice kidney after DMOG treatment

To evaluate the capacity of DMOG to stabilize HIF-1α protein, we detected the protein level of HIF-1α in the kidney of mice treated with DMOG. Immunoblotting analysis showed that DMOG treatment significantly increased the protein level of HIF-1α compared to vehicle-treated control kidney. As a positive control, CoCl2, a known HIF-1α activator, induced a high protein level of HIF-1α (Fig. 1a). These results prove that pretreatment with DMOG promotes the stabilization of HIF-1α protein.

Fig. 1
figure 1

DMOG promotes the stabilization and activation of HIF-1α in mice kidney. Mice kidney was subjected to different treatments. Control: treated with vehicle; DMOG: treated with 40 mg/kg DMOG; CoCl2: treated with 30 mg/kg CoCl2. a HIF-1α protein level was detected by immunoblotting. The samples were loaded in duplicate. b Expression of HIF-1α target genes iNOS, EPO, and HO-1 at mRNA level was determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction. mRNA fold changes of iNOS, EPO, and HO-1 were calculated using β-actin as an internal control. Quantitative data are expressed as mean ± standard error of mean; n = 6 animals/group. *P < 0.05 versus control

To explore the biological effects of DMOG-induced HIF-1α stabilization, next we detected the expression of HIF-1α target genes in mice kidney. Real-time PCR analysis demonstrated that the expressions of iNOS, EPO, and HO-1 at mRNA level were significantly increased in the DMOG-treated kidney compared to the vehicle-treated control kidney (Fig. 1b). Collectively, these data confirm that DMOG stabilizes HIF-1α and promotes the expression of HIF-1α targets in the kidney.

DMOG promotes iNOS expression in postischemia kidney

iNOS is one of the target genes of HIF-1α and is implicated in IRI although its role remains controversial. Thus, we focussed on iNOS and examined its expression in different experimental groups of mice. A modest induction of iNOS was observed in saline vehicle-treated kidney exposed to IRI compared with sham kidney. DMOG-pretreated IRI kidney showed significantly higher expression of iNOS compared with saline vehicle-treated kidney after IRI. The increase in iNOS expression was partially inhibited in animals treated by iNOS inhibitor GW274150 after DMOG pretreatment (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

DMOG promotes iNOS expression in postischemia kidney. iNOS protein level was detected by immunoblotting in the kidney lysate from different groups of mice. Actin served as loading control. The sham kidneys exhibited no detectable iNOS. Three independent experiments all led to iNOS expressions. DMOG pretreatment (DMOG+IRI) significantly increased iNOS expression compared with ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) kidneys. Administration with selective iNOS inhibitor GW274150 after DMOG pretreatment (DMOG+GW+IRI) decreased the expression of iNOS compared with DMOG-pretreated group. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of mean; n = 6 animals/group. *P < 0.05

iNOS inhibitor antagonizes the protective effects of DMOG on the kidney of IRI mice

Renal IRI mice exhibited a significant increase in serum creatinine level compared to sham-operated animals, suggesting a severe renal dysfunction. Mice pretreated with DMOG before renal ischemia showed a significantly decreased serum creatinine level compared with untreated mice, indicating ameliorated renal function. Nevertheless, serum creatinine level was significantly higher in IRI mice treated with both DMOG and iNOS inhibitor GW274150 compared to IRI mice treated with DMOG alone (Fig. 3). These results suggest that DMOG has protective effects on kidney function during IRI, which could be attenuated by iNOS inhibitor.

Fig. 3
figure 3

DMOG and GW274150 have antagonistic effect on serum creatinine level after ischemia/reperfusion injury. Serum creatinine level was dramatically increased in IRI mice, which was reduced by DMOG treatment (DMOG+IRI), while pretreatment with GW274150 before DMOG administration (DMOG+GW+IRI) blunt this reduction. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of mean; n = 6 animals/group. *P < 0.05

To provide more evidence that DMOG and iNOS inhibitors have antagonistic effects on renal function during IRI, we examined histological morphology of the kidney. Representative HE-stained sections showed reduced cast formation and less extensive tubular necrosis after DMOG treatment in comparison with the controls (Fig. 4a). Jablonski grading semi-quantitative scoring of HE stains showed that mice treated with GW274150 after DMOG pretreatment exhibited significantly higher Jablonski scores in the kidney (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4
figure 4

DMOG and GW274150 have antagonistic effect on kidney morphology after ischemia/reperfusion injury. a Animals subjected to sham operation (A), ischemia/reperfusion injury (B), pretreated with DMOG before IRI (C), treated with GW274150 after DMOG administration before IRI (D). b Jablonski grading scale score was estimated based on hematoxylin and eosin staining. Data represent mean ± standard error of mean; n = 6 animals/group. *P < 0.05. Original magnification, ×200

Next, we employed a TUNEL assay to assess the apoptosis of renal cells (Fig. 5). As expected, TUNEL-positive epithelial cells were rarely observed in the kidneys of sham-operated animals. In contrast, ischemia caused a marked increase in apoptotic cells (26.0 ± 3.6%). DMOG significantly reduced the number of apoptotic cells (8.2 ± 1.5%). Treatment with iNOS inhibitor GW27415 before renal ischemia abated the reduction in apoptotic cells induced by DMOG pretreatment (17.3 ± 2.5%).

Fig. 5
figure 5

DMOG and GW274150 have antagonistic effect on renal cell apoptosis after ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI). Apoptosis in different groups of mice was detected by TUNEL. a Sham-operated mice demonstrated almost no positive cells. b After IRI, TUNEL-positive cells appeared in the out medulla. c Pretreatment of mice with DMOG before IRI led to a decrease in the number of TUNEL-positive cells. d Treatment with GW27415 after DMOG administration led to an increase in the number of TUNEL-positive cells. Original magnification, ×200

Vimentin, an intermediate filament protein that is expressed almost exclusively in mesenchymal cells, has been shown to be detected in mitotically active proximal tubular cells after IRI [14]. As a marker for tubulointerstitial injury, vimentin was also detected in this study (Fig. 6). While weak vimentin staining was detected in the tubulointerstitium in sham-operated mice kidneys (5.4 ± 3.1), strong vimentin staining was predominantly detected in tubular epithelial cells and peritubular cells after ischemia/reperfusion (89.2 ± 22.7). Pretreatment with DMOG significantly reduced vimentin expression after 24 h of reperfusion (13.6 ± 4.2). However, GW274150 administration antagonized DMOG-induced down-regulation of vimentin expression (63.7 ± 18.5).

Fig. 6
figure 6

DMOG and GW274150 have antagonistic effect on vimentin expression in ischemia/reperfusion kidney. Vimentin expression in different groups of mice was detected by immunohistochemical staining. Very few scattered vimentin intermediate filaments were observed in the out medulla of sham-operated mice (a) or mice pretreated with DMOG before ischemia (c). However, strong staining of vimentin was detected in mice subjected to ischemia/reperfusion injury alone (b) or mice that had been pretreated with iNOS inhibitor GW274150 after DMOG administration before ischemia (d). Original magnification, ×200

Discussion

Since renal parenchymal hypoxia evidently plays an important role in the development of acute kidney injury, induction of hypoxia adaptation has been proposed as a novel interventional strategy in such high-risk patients [8, 15]. Although it is well known that acute systemic hypoxia/ischemia induces delayed preconditioning in the kidney [16, 17], the potential protection provided by chemical induction of a hypoxia response with DMOG has not been investigated. Here, we demonstrate that a single dose of DMOG (40 mg/kg) induced a delayed preconditioning that has protective effects on the kidney as evidenced by the reduction in serum creatinine, histological score, the number of apoptotic cells, and the expression of vimentin in the kidney 24 h after IRI.

HIF-1α is a key transcription factor that mediates tissue adaptive response to hypoxia by directly regulating the expression of a large number of target genes. DMOG is an effective inhibitor of PHD, and the inhibition of PHD by DMOG has been shown to promote the stabilization of HIF-1α and other beneficial factors, prevent IRI injury, and attenuate the acute inflammatory response [1821]. Additionally, DMOG has an anti-apoptotic activity in different cell types under ischemia/hypoxia conditions. The mechanism of the protective effects could be mediated by mitochondrial pathway involving reduced cytochrome c release and caspase-3 activation [22, 23]. In this study, we employed DMOG to obtain the long-lasting stability and activity of HIF-1α in murine kidney that was sustained under normoxic condition for 24 h. In addition, our results showed that mRNA level of iNOS, EPO and HO-1 was significantly increased after pretreatment with DMOG, which paralleled HIF-1α activation. These data prove that DMOG stabilizes HIF-1α and promotes its biological activity.

While previous evidence has shown that both EPO and HO-1 could protect the kidney against the injury caused by ischemia reperfusion [24, 25], the role of iNOS in IRI remains controversial [26, 27]. On the one hand, increased activity of NOS is associated with IRI, and iNOS was considered as a proinflammatory factor in ischemia reperfusion injury [26]. On the other hand, nonselective NOS inhibitors are known to worsen the postischemic renal function, whereas l-arginine, a nitric oxide (NO) precursor, can reverse NOS inhibitor–induced deterioration of renal function. GW274150 ([(S)-2-Amino-(1-iminoethylamino)-5-thioheptanoic acid]) has recently been identified as a novel, highly selective, potent, and long-acting inhibitor of iNOS. GW274150 is a sulfur-substituted acetamine amino acid derivative of l-lysine, which, like 1400 W, has a very high selectivity for iNOS versus eNOS (>250-fold) or nNOS (>80-fold) [27]. In the current study, we demonstrate the up-regulation of iNOS in DMOG-pretreated IRI kidney, which was partially inhibited by GW274150. Next, we provide evidence that iNOS inhibitor GW274150 antagonized the protective effects of DMOG on the kidney of IRI mice, suggesting that iNOS plays protective function in kidney IRI. These results are consistent with the overwhelming opinion that iNOS plays a role in protection induced by mild sublethal ischemic preconditioning against a secondary exposure to ischemia reperfusion in retina, heart, brain, and kidney [2831]. Notably, renal protective effects of delayed preconditioning were attenuated by a selective inhibitor of iNOS L-NII, and delayed ischemic preconditioning was not observed in iNOS knockout mice [16].

Additionally, many studies have demonstrated that iNOS is an essential mediator of the delayed phase of preconditioning induced by a number of pharmacological agents [32, 33]. But little is known about the role of iNOS in hypoxia preconditioning mediated by HIF-1 in any organ. Since iNOS is primarily regulated by HIF-1α in the kidney, we hypothesized that iNOS contributes to the protective effects of DMOG in the kidney. Our data show that serum creatinine level, apoptosis, vimentin expression, and histological injury in the kidney were significantly increased in mice treated by both DMOG and GW274150 compared to DMOG-treated mice. Thus, we speculate that renal protection achieved by the pharmacological activation of HIF-1α is at least partially mediated by iNOS, which may act as the downstream effector of DMOG. In agreement with our speculation, Xi et al. demonstrated that CoCl2-induced delayed cardioprotection is dependent on iNOS because the infarct limiting effect was absent in the iNOS-deficient mice [34]. In addition, Natarajan et al. reported that the cardioprotective effects achieved by PHD2 silencing and HIF-1 stabilization were lost in iNOS knockout mice and wild-type mice treated with iNOS inhibitor 1400W [19].

As demonstrated previously, the up-regulation of iNOS may increase renal NO generation. The role of NO in IRI is controversial [3537]. Low levels of NO may be protective, but higher levels may be detrimental [38]. A delicate balance so as to allow the production of physiologically relevant amounts of NO but at the same time block the generation of reactive nitrogen species through repressing excessive NO levels is extremely required for therapeutic interference with iNOS [39]. Therefore, we suppose that preconditioning with DMOG has induced moderate iNOS/NO, which initiates cytoprotection signaling to defend against subsequent injury in renal tubule cells. Interestingly, previous report indicated that NO donors could induce HIF-1α expression under normoxic conditions [40]. Although our study did not address the direct role of NO in stabilization of HIF-1α in the kidney, such a possibility exists because DMOG activated HIF-1α and GW274150 blocked the DMOG-induced protection. Thus, it is plausible that increased iNOS expression after HIF-1α activation with DMOG might trigger further HIF-1α activity and extend its renoprotective effects via a positive feedback mechanism.

In summary, our study demonstrates that DMOG pretreatment induces delayed renal protection against IRI in mice by improving renal function and inhibiting apoptosis of renal cells. These beneficial effects are antagonized by selective iNOS inhibitor, suggesting that the protective effects derived from HIF-1 activation via DMOG in the kidney are partially mediated by iNOS.