Introduction

The metabolic syndrome is a clustering of cardiovascular risk factors that include abdominal obesity, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and hypertension. Insulin resistance has been implicated as a causal factor in the pathogenesis of the metabolic syndrome [1, 2]. Although several mechanisms have been proposed to mediate the link between insulin resistance and hypertension, insulin resistance alone does not explain the pathogenesis of this disorder. In recent years, chronic inflammation has been proposed as an important mediator in the development of insulin resistance and Type 2 diabetes [3, 4]. Numerous epidemiological studies have reported strong positive associations between systemic markers of inflammation with features of the metabolic syndrome and/or risk of cardiovascular events [46].

Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) is a major proinflammatory cytokine suggested to be a key mediator involved in the development of insulin resistance [7, 8]. The effects of TNF-α are mediated through its receptors: tumor necrosis factor receptor type 1 (TNFR1) or tumor necrosis factor receptor type 2 (TNFR2), with the majority of its biological actions occurring through TNFR1 activation [9]. Ligand binding to TNFR1 can result in the activation of transcription factor nuclear factor κB (NFκB) which modulates the expression of numerous inflammatory genes, including cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), chemokines, and growth factors [10, 11]. TNF-α is constitutively expressed in adipocytes and its expression is elevated in adipose tissue of obese animals [12, 13]. Studies have demonstrated that TNF-α induced insulin resistance [1215] while inhibition of TNF-α improved insulin sensitivity in obese rodents [12, 15, 16]. In addition, elevated levels of TNF-α were associated with the development of hypertension [1719].

Togashi et al. reported that inhibition of the TNF-α converting enzyme (TACE) improved insulin sensitivity in FFR, however, no accompanying reduction in blood pressure was observed [20]. Given that a relationship between insulin resistance and hypertension has been proposed [1, 21, 22], we found the lack of effect on blood pressure regulation surprising. This effect may be due to the experimental design utilized as treatment with a TACE inhibitor occurred only during the final 2 weeks of the 6 weeks of fructose feeding. Furthermore, TNF-α has been reported to modulate the pathways of various vasoactive mediators, such as the renin angiotensin system [2325], however, the exact mechanism by which TNF-α modulates vasoactive mediators and contributes to hypertension secondary to insulin resistance remains to be clarified.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of chronic etanercept treatment in insulin-resistant FFR. Etanercept is a soluble recombinant fusion protein consisting of the extracellular ligand-binding domain of TNFR2. Etanercept binds to and inactivates circulating TNF-α, thereby acting as a competitive inhibitor of TNF-α. We determined the effects of etanercept on plasma parameters, systolic blood pressure (SBP), insulin sensitivity, and vascular reactivity. We also examined the protein expression of downstream targets of TNF-α, such as endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and NFκB. We hypothesized that treatment with etanercept will prevent the development of hypertension in FFR by improving vascular function.

Methods

Animals and experimental design

Male Wistar rats were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (St-Constant, Quebec) at 5 weeks of age and randomly divided into four experimental groups: control (C, n = 20), control etanercept-treated (CE, n = 20), fructose (F, n = 20), and fructose etanercept-treated (FE, n = 20).

At 6 weeks of age, fasted (5 h) plasma parameters (glucose, insulin and triglycerides) and SBP were measured in all groups. At 7 weeks of age, rats in fructose-fed groups (F and FE) were started on a 60% fructose diet (Teklad Laboratory Diets, Madison, WI) for 6 weeks, whereas rats in control groups (C and CE) were maintained on standard laboratory rat chow containing 30% carbohydrate in the form of starch for the same period. Treatment with etanercept (CE and FE) was initiated concurrently at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg/day, three times per week via s.c. injection for the duration of the study. The dose of etanercept was used based on effective inhibition of TNF-α from previous studies in rats [2628]. Rats were housed on a 12 h light–dark cycle and received food and water ad libitum. At the end of the study, rats were euthanized with an overdose of pentobarbital (65 mg/kg, i.p.). The thoracic aorta, first branch order of the superior mesenteric artery and epidydimal fat pads were isolated, cleaned of adherent connective tissue, and used in further studies.

This investigation conforms with the Canadian Council on Animal Care Guidelines on the Care and Use of Experimental Animals. All protocols were approved by the University of British Columbia Animal Care Committee.

Blood pressure measurements

Prior to obtaining blood pressure measurements, rats were preconditioned to the procedure. SBP was measured in conscious rats using the indirect non-invasive tail-cuff method without external preheating as previously described [29, 30].

Oral glucose tolerance test and insulin sensitivity index

After 9 weeks of study, rats were fasted overnight (15 h) and subjected to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). A 40% glucose solution was prepared and administered by oral gavage (1 g/kg) to conscious animals. Blood samples were obtained at 0, 10, 20, 30, 60, and 90 min following the glucose challenge. Plasma was separated and stored at −20°C until further analysis. The insulin sensitivity index was calculated for each animal using data obtained from the OGTT using the formula of Matsuda and DeFronzo where insulin sensitivity index = 100/square root [(mean plasma glucose × mean plasma insulin) × (fasting plasma glucose × fasting plasma insulin)] [31]. Values obtained through an OGTT correlate highly with results obtained from the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp technique [31].

Blood collection

Five hour-fasted blood samples were collected from the tail vein for the determination of plasma glucose, insulin, triglycerides, TNF-α, and IL-6 levels. Plasma was separated, aliquoted, and stored at−20°C until further analysis. At termination, blood was collected via cardiac puncture for assaying angiotensin II (Ang II) or norepinephrine (NE). For plasma Ang II determination, blood was aliquoted into plastic tubes containing 0.44 mM o-phenanthroline, 25 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 1 mM p-hydroxymercuribenzoic acid, and 0.12 mM pepstatin A. For determination of plasma NE levels, blood was aliquoted into heparinized tubes. Plasma was separated and stored at−80°C until analysis.

Vascular reactivity

Isolated superior mesenteric arteries were cut into 3 mm rings and suspended on wire hooks in isolated tissue baths containing modified Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate solution pH 7.4 (118 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 0.026 mM edentate calcium disodium (EDTA), 11.1 mM glucose, and 25 mM NaHCO3) aerated with 95% O2: 5% CO2 at 37°C as previously described [32, 33]. Resting tension was adjusted to 1.0 g for each ring to allow for maximal active force generated. Changes in vascular tension were recorded using a force transducer on a Grass polygraph machine (model 79D). After an equilibration period, rings were challenged with 40 mM KCl and endothelial integrity was assessed. Vessels were subjected to a cumulative dose–response curve to phenylephrine (PE; 10−9 to 10−4 mol/l) followed by a cumulative dose–response curve to acetylcholine (ACh; 10−9 to 10−4 mol/l) in arteries precontracted with the ED70 of PE. Vessels were equilibrated to baseline between dose–response curves.

PE-induced responses were expressed as a percentage of the maximal response to KCl. Changes in ACh-induced responses were expressed as a percentage of the response to PE in each tissue. The maximum response (E max) and negative log of the concentration producing 50% of the maximum response (pD 2) were obtained by nonlinear regression analysis of individual dose–response curves using GraphPad Prism, version 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA).

Western blot analysis

Thoracic aorta and epidydimal fat pads were frozen in liquid nitrogen, powdered, and homogenized in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM EDTA, 10 μg/ml aprotinin, 5 μg/ml leupeptin, 2.5 μg/ml pepstatin, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS). Homogenates were centrifuged at 12 000g for 15 min and supernatants were collected. Total protein content was determined using the Bradford protein assay. Equal amounts of protein were subjected to sodium dodecyl polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Resolved proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat milk in Tris-buffered saline-Tween (TBS-T) and incubated with the appropriate primary antibody. Immune complexes were detected using horseradish peroxidase conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature (5% milk/TBS-T) and a chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham Pharmacia). Band intensity was analyzed using densitometry and represented as a percent of the control mean.

Biochemical measurements

Plasma glucose levels were determined using a Beckman Glucose Analyzer II (Beckman, Fullerton, CA). Plasma triglycerides were measured using an enzymatic colourimetric assay from Boehringer Mannheim (Germany). Plasma insulin levels were determined using a radioimmunoassay kit from Linco Research (St. Charles, MO). Plasma Ang II and NE levels were measured using an enzyme immunoassay kit from Cedarlane (Hornby, Ontario) and IBL Hamburg (Toronto, Ontario), respectively. Plasma TNF-α and IL-6 were determined using enzyme immunoassay kits from Biosource (Camarillo, CA).

Reagents

All chemicals were reagent grade and purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Solutions of PE and ACh were freshly prepared in Krebs-Ringer buffer. Etanercept was a generous gift from Amgen (Seattle, WA).

Statistical analysis

All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis of all data was performed using the Number Cruncher Statistical Software 2000 (NCSS, Kaysville, UT). Data with multiple time points were analyzed by General Linear Model ANOVA and inter-group comparisons of dependent variables were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. For all results, the Newman-Keuls test for post-hoc analysis was applied. A value of P < 0.05 was taken as the level of significance.

Results

General characteristics, SBP, and insulin sensitivity index

General characteristics of rats following 9 weeks of etanercept treatment are summarized in Table 1. No differences in body weight or fasted plasma glucose were observed among the experimental groups. Food intake was slightly, but significantly, reduced in fructose-fed (F and FE) animals as compared to control (C and CE) animals. Fasted plasma insulin and triglyceride levels were significantly elevated in FFR. Treatment with etanercept had no effect on any parameters measured in either control or FFR. Following 9 weeks of study, animals fed a high fructose diet had significantly elevated SBP. Chronic treatment with etanercept prevented the increase in blood pressure in FFR. Treatment with etanercept had no effect on blood pressure in control rats. High fructose feeding resulted in significantly impaired insulin sensitivity as demonstrated by the decreased insulin sensitivity index values (Table 1). Chronic etanercept treatment did not alter insulin sensitivity in either control or FFR.

Table 1 General characteristics, fasted plasma parameters, and SBP of rats following 9 weeks of etanercept treatment

Vascular reactivity

PE-induced contractile responses of superior mesenteric arteries from control and FFR are shown in Fig. 1a. There were no differences in the maximum contractile response (E max) or sensitivity (pD 2) to PE (Table 2). Chronic etanercept treatment had no effect on vessels from either control or FFR. ACh-induced relaxation of mesenteric arteries from animals following 9 weeks of treatment are shown in Fig. 1b. Arteries from FFR had significantly impaired relaxation responses to ACh as compared to arteries from control rats. Etanercept treatment normalized E max values of arteries from FFR without altering the sensitivity to ACh (Table 2). Etanercept treatment had no effect on vessels from control animals.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Cumulative dose-response curves to a PE and b ACh in superior mesenteric arteries from control and FFR rats following 9 weeks of etanercept treatment. Values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 14

Table 2 E max and pD 2 values in superior mesenteric arteries from control and fructose-fed rats following 9 weeks of etanercept treatment

Plasma TNF-α and IL-6 levels

Plasma TNF-α were significantly elevated in control and FFR treated with etanercept following 9 weeks of treatment (Fig. 2a). There was a trend for animals from the F group to have slightly elevated levels of plasma TNF-α as compared to animals in the C group, although this increase did not reach statistical significance. No difference was observed in plasma levels of IL-6 after 9 weeks of treatment (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of chronic etanercept treatment on plasma a TNF-α (n = 20) and b IL-6 (n = 12) levels in control and FFR following 9 weeks of study. Values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 20.  P < 0.05 vs. C; * P < 0.05 vs. F

Plasma NE and Ang II levels

Plasma NE levels were statistically significant among the experimental groups, however, the Newman-Keuls post-hoc test was unable to determine where the differences were (Fig. 3a). Chronic etanercept treatment had a tendency to increase NE levels in both control and FFR. Plasma Ang II levels were significantly elevated following 9 weeks of high fructose feeding (Fig. 3b). Chronic etanercept treatment had no effect on plasma Ang II in either control or FFR.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of chronic etanercept treatment on plasma a NE (n = 12) and b Ang II (n = 20) levels in control and FFR following 9 weeks of study. Values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 12.  P < 0.05 vs. C, CE

Western blot analysis

Arteries from FFR had significantly reduced protein expression of eNOS as compared to arteries from rats in the C and CE groups (Fig. 4b). Animals from the FE group showed significantly increased eNOS expression as compared to arteries from the F group. No significant differences were observed in the expression of iNOS among the experimental groups (Fig. 4d).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Representative Western blots of a eNOS and c iNOS from thoracic aorta from control and FFR following 9 weeks of study. Effect of chronic etanercept treatment on the relative intensity of b eNOS and d iNOS protein expression in control and FFR following 9 weeks of study. Values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 10.  P < 0.05 different from C, CE; *P < 0.05 vs. F

There was a trend for fat pads from FFR to have increased protein expression of transmembrane TNF-α, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 5b). Fat pads from animals in the FE group exhibited significant elevations in transmembrane TNF-α as compared to animals from the C and CE groups. Although there was a trend for fat pads from the F group to have increased protein expression of soluble TNF-α (Fig. 4d), this difference did not reach statistical significance.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Representative Western blots of a transmembrane TNF-α (26 kDa) and c soluble TNF-α (17 kDa) from epidydimal fat pads from control and FFR following 9 weeks of study. Effect of chronic etanercept treatment on the relative intensity of b transmembrane TNF-α (26 kDa), and d soluble TNF-α (17 kDa) protein expression in control and FFR following 9 weeks of study. Values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 12. * P < 0.05 vs. C, CE

Fat pads from animals in the CE, F, and FE groups had significantly reduced phosphorylation of the p65 subunit of NFκB, indicating a decreased activation of NFκB p65, as compared to animals in the C group (Fig. 6b). There were no significant differences observed in the expression of the p100 subunit of NFκB which is the precursor to the p52 subunit of NFκB (Fig. 6d). No differences were observed in the expression of the p52 subunit of NFκB, which is a necessary subunit to NFκB, among the experimental groups (Fig. 6f).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Representative Western blots of a p-NFκB, c NFκB p100, and e NFκB p52 from epidydimal fat pads from control and FFR following 9 weeks of study. Effect of chronic etanercept treatment on the relative intensity of b p-NFκB, d NFκB p100, and f NFκB p52 protein expression in control and FFR following 9 weeks of study. Values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 12.  P < 0.05 vs. C

Discussion

High fructose feeding resulted in insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and elevated SBP. Chronic treatment with etanercept, a soluble recombinant fusion protein consisting of the extracellular ligand binding domain of TNFR2, prevented the rise in SBP, while normalizing eNOS expression and vascular function. Surprisingly, it did so without affecting insulin levels, insulin sensitivity, or triglyceride levels in these animals. Given the lack of elevated plasma TNF-α levels in FFR, and that etanercept treatment was not associated with an improvement in insulin sensitivity in these animals, its ability to prevent the rise in blood pressure was unexpected. We propose two potential mechanisms that may explain these findings. It is possible an elevation in TNF-α occurred as an initiating event that subsequently activated other vasoactive mediators, contributing to the eventual development of hypertension. Alternatively, etanercept may be acting through a mechanism independent of TNF-α inhibition.

An association between TNF-α and insulin resistance has been demonstrated in animal models of obesity and insulin resistance [12, 15, 16]. Togashi et al. demonstrated that FFR had elevated TNF-α levels and treatment with a TACE inhibitor restored insulin sensitivity [20]. In contrast, we found that following 9 weeks of fructose feeding, FFR did not exhibit elevations in inflammatory mediators, TNF-α, IL-6, or iNOS, which suggests that the development of fructose-induced hypertension is not associated with a maintained inflammatory-mediated process. Interestingly, there was a significant decrease in the phosphorylation of NFκB p65 in FFR as compared to control animals, which suggests that inflammation is actually reduced in FFR. A possible explanation for these observations is that an elevation in TNF-α levels occurs early after the onset of fructose feeding, and that subsequent compensatory mechanisms are activated to negatively regulate secretion of TNF-α into the circulation. The concept of reverse signalling has recently emerged and proposes that binding of transmembrane TNF-α to its receptor can transduce a reverse signal through the cytoplasmic tail of transmembrane TNF-α triggering cell activation, cytokine suppression, or apoptosis of the cell containing the transmembrane TNF-α [34]. However, if early elevations in TNF-α were occurring in FFR and initiating a sequence of events leading to the eventual development of insulin resistance, it is not clear why treatment with etanercept did not prevent a decrease in insulin sensitivity in these animals. It is possible that in this non-obese model, TNF-α is not the major factor in the development of insulin resistance. Alternatively, etanercept may not be able to prevent the effects of TNF-α on the insulin signalling pathway. It should be noted that in contrast to insulin-resistant, obese rodents [12, 15, 16], etanercept treatment in humans resulted in no improvements in insulin sensitivity in patients with the metabolic syndrome [35, 36], insulin resistance [37, 38] or Type 2 diabetes [39]. It is possible that in humans, etanercept is not capable of altering the site at which TNF-α interrupts the insulin signalling pathway [39], or as a result of the autocrine/paracrine action of TNF-α, neutralizing circulating TNF-α may be insufficient to improve insulin action [38]. Alternatively, the dissociation of soluble TNF-α from etanercept may allow soluble TNF-α to remain biologically active and able to signal through its cell surface receptors [40].

As expected, etanercept treatment reduced NFκB activation and increased plasma TNF-α in both control and FFR. Similar increases in TNF-α have been observed in humans treated with etanercept [4143] and may be attributed to the ability of etanercept to prolong the half-life of TNF-α by acting as a tumour necrosis factor carrier [44, 45]. Eason et al. have demonstrated that elevated levels of TNF-α during etanercept treatment were associated with concomitant low levels of TNF-α bioactivity [46], which may explain why we observed increased TNF-α levels paralleled with decreased activation of NFκB.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that etanercept treatment prevented the development of hypertension, normalized acetylcholine-induced relaxation, and restored eNOS expression in FFR. Our findings are consistent with previous studies that have reported improved acetylcholine-induced relaxation with etanercept treatment [27, 28, 4749] and improved eNOS expression following treatment with a neutralizing antibody to TNF-α [50]. However, in these studies, the beneficial effects of etanercept on endothelial function and eNOS expression have been associated with its ability to inhibit TNF-α. More recently, the role of increased oxidative stress as a proposed mechanism in the development of fructose-induced hypertension has gained attention [51, 52]. Interestingly, in a rodent model of Ang II-induced hypertension, vascular infiltration of T lymphocytes associated with an increase in reactive oxygen species production was demonstrated, while treatment with etanercept not only prevented the increase in vascular oxidative stress, it also prevented the development of hypertension [53]. In the present study, we found that Ang II levels were elevated in both untreated and etanercept-treated FFR. We propose that the beneficial effects of etanercept on blood pressure, vascular reactivity, and eNOS protein expression may have occurred through a reduction in oxidative stress. Whether this is due to inhibition of the effects of locally produced TNF-α, or to a TNF-α-independent mechanism is not clear. However, the ability of etanercept to reduce blood pressure and improve vascular function despite its lack of effect on insulin resistance may be of clinical importance in conditions such as the metabolic syndrome or Type 2 diabetes and requires further investigation.

Hypertriglyceridemia, and not insulin resistance/hyperinsulinemia, has been proposed as a causal link in the development of hypertension in FFR [54]. Our data do not support this hypothesis given that the development of hypertension was attenuated in FFR chronically treated with etanercept, despite the presence of hypertriglyceridemia. Similar observations have been made in FFR treated with the AT1 receptor antagonists, losartan [55], TCV-116 [56] or L-158,809 [57], or thromboxane synthase inhibitor, dazmegral [58] in which the development of hypertension was prevented despite the presence of hypertriglyceridemia. Furthermore, a reduction in elevated triglyceride levels did not reduce elevated blood pressure in FFR [59, 60], supporting the concept of a triglyceride-independent component involved in the development of fructose-induced hypertension.

In conclusion, results from the present study suggest that chronic etanercept treatment prevented the development of hypertension by improving vascular function and restoring eNOS expression in FFR. These effects do not appear to be associated with a maintained state of chronic inflammation and occurred in an insulin-independent manner.