Abstract
The variogram function is an important measure of the spatial dependencies of a geostatistical or other spatial dataset. It plays a central role in kriging, designing spatial studies, and in understanding the spatial properties of geological and environmental phenomena. It is therefore important to understand the variability attached to estimates of the variogram. Existing methods for constructing confidence intervals around the empirical variogram either rely on strong assumptions, such as normality or known variogram function, or are based on resampling blocks and subject to edge effect biases. This paper proposes two new procedures for addressing these concerns: a quasi-block-bootstrap and a quasi-block-jackknife. The new methods are based on transforming the data to decorrelate it based on a fitted variogram model, resampling blocks from the decorrelated data, and then recorrelating. The coverage properties of the new confidence intervals are compared by simulation to a number of existing resampling-based intervals. The proposed quasi-block-jackknife confidence interval is found to have the best properties of all of the methods considered across a range of scenarios, including normally and lognormally distributed data and misspecification of the variogram function used to decorrelate the data.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Chiles J-P, Delfiner P (1999) Geostatistics: Modelling spatial uncertainty. Wiley, New York
Clark RG, Allingham S (2010) Further simulation results on the robustness of resampling confidence intervals for empirical variograms. University of Wollongong Centre for Statistical and Survey Methodology Working Paper 02-10. http://www.cssm.uow.edu.au and http://ro.uow.edu.au/
Cosh MH, Stedinger J, Brutsaert W (2003) Time changes in spatial structure of surface variability in the southern great plains. Adv Water Resour 26:407–415
Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York
Cressie N, Hawkins D (1980) Robust estimation of the variogram: I. Math Geol 12(2):115–125
Davison A, Hinkley D (1997) Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Dowd P (1984) The variogram and kriging: robust and resistant estimators. In: Geostatistics for natural resource characterization. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 91–106
Emery X (2007) Reducing fluctuations in the sample variogram. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 21(4):391–403
Garrigues S, Allard D, Baret F, Weiss M (2006) Quantifying spatial heterogeneity at the landscape scale using variogram models. Remote Sens Environ 103:81–96
Gascuel-Odoux C, Boivin P (1994) Variability of variograms and spatial estimates due to soil sampling: a case study. Geoderma 62:165–182
Hall P (1985) Resampling a coverage pattern. Stoch Process Appl 20:231–246
Huisman J, Snepvangers J, Bouten W, Heuvelink G (2003) Monitoring temporal development of spatial soil water content variation: comparison of ground penetrating radar and time domain reflectometry. Vadose Zone J 2(4):519–529
Kunsch HR (1989) The jackknife and the bootstrap for general stationary observations. Ann Math Stat 17(3):1217–1241
Lahiri S (2003) Resampling methods for dependent data. Springer, New York
Lark RM (2000) A comparison of some robust estimators of the variogram for use in soil survey. Eur J Soil Sci 51:137–157
Marchant B, Lark R (2004) Estimating variogram uncertainty. Math Geol 36(8):867–898
Matheron G (1963) Geostatistics. Econ Geol 58(2):1246–1266
Oliver M, Webster R (2001) Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Wiley, Chichester
R Development Core Team (2007) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0
Schlather M (2006) RandomFields: Simulation and analysis of random fields. R package version 1.3.29
Sebastyén Z (2004) Uncertainty investigation of the semivariogram by means of the bootstrap method. Acta Geol Hung 47(1):83–91
Shafer J, Varljen M (1990) Approximation of confidence limits on sample semivariograms from single realizations of spatially correlated random fields. Water Resour Res 26(8):1787–1802
Solow A (1985) Bootstrapping correlated data. Math Geol 17(7):769–775
Tang L, Schucany W, Woodward W, Gunst R (2006) A parametric spatial bootstrap. Technical Report SMU-TR-337, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas
Wang L, Okin GS, Caylor KK, Macko SA (2009) Spatial heterogeneity and sources of soil carbon in southern African savannas. Geoderma 149:402–408
Wingle W, Poeter E (1993) Uncertainty associated with semivariograms used for site simulation. Ground Water 31(5):365–376
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clark, R.G., Allingham, S. Robust Resampling Confidence Intervals for Empirical Variograms. Math Geosci 43, 243–259 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-010-9314-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-010-9314-5