Abstract
Using data from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development, a prospective longitudinal study of 411 London males, the main aim of this research is to compare the age of onset of six types of offenses according to different methods of measurement – prospective self-reports, retrospective self-reports, and official records – and also to explore self-reported and official onset sequences. Results showed that ages of onset reported in retrospective accounts generally tended to be higher than those reported prospectively. Agreement rates between prospective and retrospective accounts were lowest for minor forms of offending, and highest for more serious offenses such as theft of vehicles. Males with heavy substance use habits were less likely to report the same age of onset retrospectively compared with prospectively. Denial rates were substantial in all comparisons, particularly for minor forms of offending. Comparisons between self-reported and official measures of onset revealed that there was a greater degree of agreement between the two measures for serious offenses. Whereas self-reported onset sequences suggested that minor crimes were committed before more serious offenses, official onset sequences suggested the reverse. The findings show that retrospective reports are not suitable to address research questions requiring detailed information (i.e., most criminal career parameters: age of onset, frequency, age of termination, etc.), for studying minor forms of offending, and for samples of individuals with serious substance use habits. Furthermore, official measures of offending can also produce misleading results, particularly when studying minor forms of offending.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
A. Blumstein D. P. Farrington S. Moitra (1985) Delinquency Careers: Innocents, Desisters, and Persisters M. Tonry N. Morris (Eds) Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, Vol. 6 University of Chicago Press Chicago 187–219
M. Cusson (1998) Criminologie actuelle Presses Universitaires de France Paris
D.S. Elliott (1994) ArticleTitleSerious Violent Offenders: Onset, Developmental Course, and Termination Criminology 32 1–21
M.L. Erickson (1972) ArticleTitleThe Changing Relationship between Official and Self-Reported Measures of Delinquency: An Exploratory-Predictive Study J. Crim. Law, Criminol. Pol. Sci. 63/3 388–395
D.P. Farrington (1973) ArticleTitleSelf-Reports of Deviant Behavior: Predictive and Stable? J. Crim. Law Criminol 61 IssueID1 99–110
D.P. Farrington (1977) ArticleTitleThe Effects of Public Labelling Brit. J. Crim. 17 IssueID2 112–125
D.P. Farrington (1989) Self-Reported and Official Offending From Adolescence to Adulthood M.W. Klein (Eds) Cross-National Research in Self-Reported Crime and Delinquency Kluwer Dordecht 399–423
D.P. Farrington (2003) Key Results from the First Forty Years of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development M.D. Krohn T.P. Thornberry (Eds) Taking Stock of Delinquency: An Overview of Findings from Contemporary Longitudinal Studies Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers New York 137–183
D.P. Farrington J.D. Hawkins (1991) ArticleTitlePredicting Participation, Early Onset, and Later Persistence in Officially Recorded Offending Crim. Beh. Ment. Health 1 1–33
D.P. Farrington R. Loeber D.S. Elliott J.D. Hawkins D.B. Kandel M.W. Klein J. McCord D.C. Rowe R.E. Tremblay (1990) Advancing Knowledge about the Onset of Delinquency and Crime B.B. Lahey A.E. Kazdin (Eds) Advances in Clinical Child Psychology NumberInSeriesVol. 13 Plenum New York 283–342
D.P. Farrington R. Loeber M. Stouthamer-Loeber W. Kammen ParticleVan L. Schmidt (1996) ArticleTitleSelf-Reported Delinquency and a Combined Delinquency Seriousness Scale Based on Boys, Mothers, and Teachers: Concurrent and Predictive Validity for African–Americans and Caucasians Criminology 34 493–517
D.P. Farrington S. Lambert D.J. West (1998) ArticleTitleCriminal Careers of Two Generations of Family Members in the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development Stud. Crime Crime Prev 7 85–106
Farrington, D. P., Jolliffe, D., Loeber, R., and Homish, D. L. (2003a). How Many Offenses are Really Committed per Juvenile Court Offender? OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin.
D.P. Farrington D. Jolliffe J.D. Hawkins R.F. Catalano K.G. Hill R. Kosterman (2003) ArticleTitleComparing Delinquency Careers in Court Records and Self-Reports Criminol 41 IssueID3 933–958
M. Gottfredson T. Hirschi (1990) A General Theory of Crime Stanford University Press Stanford
B. Henry E.T. Moffitt A. Caspi J. Langley A.P. Silva (1994) ArticleTitleOn the “Remembrance of Things Past””: A Longitudinal Evaluation of the Retrospective Method Psych. Ass. 6 IssueID2 92–101
D. Huizinga D.S. Elliott (1986) ArticleTitleReassessing the Reliability and Validity of Self-Report Delinquency Measures J. Quant Criminol. 2 IssueID4 293–327
D. Jolliffe D.P. Farrington J.D. Hawkins R.F. Catalano K.G. Hill R. Kosterman (2003) ArticleTitlePredictive, Concurrent, Prospective and Retrospective Validity of Self-Reported Delinquency Crim. Beh. Ment. Health 13 179–197
M. Le Blanc M. Fréchette (1989) Male Criminal Activity from Childhood Through Youth: Multilevel and Developmental Perspectives Springer-Verlag New York
R. Loeber D.P. Farrington D. Petechuk (2003) Child Delinquency: Early Intervention and Prevention. Child Delinquency Bulletin Series Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Washington DC
R. Loeber M. Le Blanc (1990) Toward a Developmental Criminology M. Tonry N. Morris (Eds) Crime and Justice, A Review of Research University of Chicago Press Chicago 375–473
S. Maruna (2001) Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild their Lives American Psychological Association Washington
M.G. Maxfield B. Weiler C. Widom (2000) ArticleTitleComparing Self-Reports and Official Records of Arrests J. Quant. Crim 16 IssueID1 87–110
S. Menard D.S. Elliott (1990) ArticleTitleLongitudinal and Cross-Sectional Data Collection and Analysis in the Study of Crime and Delinquency Just. Quart. 7 IssueID1 11–55
T. Moffitt A. Caspi M. Rutter P.A. Silva (2001) Sex Differences in Antisocial Behaviour Cambridge University Press Cambridge
D.S. Nagin D.P. Farrington (1992) ArticleTitleThe Onset and Persistence of Offending Criminol 32 501–523
H. Stattin D. Magnusson (1995) ArticleTitleOnset of Official Delinquency: Its Co-occurrence in Time with Educational, Behavioral, and Interpersonal Problems Brit. J. Criminol. 35 IssueID3 417–449
R. Svensson (2002) ArticleTitleStrategic Offenses in the Criminal Career Context Brit. J. Criminol. 42 395–411
J.G. Weis (1986) Issues in the Measurement of Criminal Careers A. Blumstein J. Cohen J.A. Roth C.A. Visher (Eds) Criminal Careers and Career Criminals. NumberInSeriesVol. 2 National Academy Press Washington DC 1–51
D.J. West D.P. Farrington (1973) Who Becomes Delinquent? Heinemann London
D.J. West D.P. Farrington (1977) The Delinquent Way of Life Heinemann London
P.H. Wikström (1995) Self-Control, Temptations, Frictions, and Punishment: An Integrated Approach to Crime Prevention P.-O.H. Wikström R.V. Clarke J. McCord (Eds) Integrating Crime Prevention Strategies: Propensity and Opportunity. National Council on Crime Prevention Stockholm 7–38
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kazemian, L., Farrington, D.P. Comparing the Validity of Prospective, Retrospective, and Official Onset for Different Offending Categories. J Quant Criminol 21, 127–147 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-005-2489-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-005-2489-0