Abstract
Understanding the factors that contribute to high-quality mentoring relationships is critical to developing and sustaining effective mentoring programs. In study 1, sixty-three adolescent mentors, from two high schools, were surveyed four to six weeks after being matched with elementary-age mentees. Hierarchical regression models revealed that mentees’ academic and behavioral risk status, parental involvement, and program quality all explained variance in mentor-perceived relationship quality, but none remained significant predictors after mentors’ self-efficacy, motivations for self-enhancement, and assessments of their mentees’ support seeking behaviors were accounted for. Study 2 cross-validates the regression model in study 1 and examines the concurrent validity and predictive validity of a measure of mentoring match characteristics using mid-year and end-of-year assessments from mentees and mentors.
Editors’ Strategic Implications: The focus on mentors’ initial impressions of their mentees and the relationship represents a novel contribution to the study of relationship formation and persistence. The authors provide a promising strategy – and descriptions of specific measures – to help programs study relationships that endure or terminate. Coordinators will benefit from the knowledge that if mentors feel efficacious and if the mentoring relationship is strong, mentors are more likely to persist.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aseltine, R. H., Dupre, M., & Lamlein, P. (2000). Mentoring as a drug prevention strategy: An evaluation of Across Ages. Adolescent and Family Health, 1,(1), 11–20.
Bainer, D. L., & Didham, C. (1994). Mentoring and other support behaviors in elementary schools. Journal of Educational Research, 87(4), 240–247.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
Blechman, E. A. (1992). Mentors for high-risk minority youth: From effective communication to bicultural competence. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 21(2), 160–169.
Blocher, K. M. (1993). Factors in sustaining adult voluntary mentoring relationships with at-risk youth. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54(6-A).
Blum, D. J., & Jones, L. A. (1993). Academic growth group and mentoring program for potential dropouts. School Counselor, 40(3), 207–217.
Borman, C., & Colson, S. (1984). Mentoring: An effective career guidance technique. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 32(3), 192–197.
Cameron-Jones, M. O., & Hara, P. (1995). Mentors’ perceptions of their roles with students in initial teacher training. Cambridge Journal of Education, 25(2), 189–199.
Clary, E. G., & Orenstein, L. (1991). The amount and effectiveness of help: The relationship of motives and abilities to helping behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(1), 58–64.
Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J, & Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(6), 1516–1530.
Cohen, D. A., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Diem, R. A. (1991). Dealing with the tip of the iceberg: School responses to at risk behaviors. High School Journal, 75(2), 119–125.
Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 755–764.
DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 157–197.
DuBois, D. L., & Neville, H. A. (1997). Youth mentoring: Investigation of relationship characteristics and perceived benefits. Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 291–332.
Freedman, M. (1993). The kindness of strangers: Adult mentors, urban youth, and the new volunteerism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Grossman, J. B., & Tierney, J. P. (1998). Does mentoring work? An impact study of the Big Brothers Big Sisters Program. Evaluation Review, 22(3), 403–426.
Grossman, J. B., & Rhodes, J. E. (2002). The test of time: Predictors and effects of duration in youth mentoring relationships. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 199–219.
Harris, J. T., & Nakkula, M. J. (1999). Match Characteristics Questionnaire (MCQ). Unpublished measure, Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Karcher, M. J. (1999). Developmental mentoring in the schools: A manual for program implementation and evaluation. Unpublished manual, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Karcher, M. J., Davis, C., & Powell, B. (2002). Developmental mentoring in the schools: Testing connectedness as a mediating variable in the promotion of academic achievement. The School Community Journal, 12(2), 36–52.
Karcher, M. J. & Lindwall, J. (2003). Social interest, connectedness, and challenging experiences: What makes high school mentors’ persist? Journal of Individual Psychology, 59, 293–315.
Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
LoSciuto, L., Rajala, A. K., Townsend, T. N., & Taylor, A. S. (1996). An outcome evaluation of Across Ages: An intergenerational mentoring approach to drug prevention. Special Issue: Preventing adolescent substance abuse. Journal of Adolescent Research, 11(1), 116–129.
Marshall, S. (2001). Do I matter? Construct validation of adolescents’ perceived mattering to parents and friends. Journal of Adolescence, 24, 473–490.
Morrow, K., & Styles, M. (1995). Building relationships with youth in program settings: A study of Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
Noll, V. (1997). Cross-age mentoring program for social skills development. The School Counselor, 44, 239–242.
Rhodes, J. E. (1994). Older and wiser: Mentoring relationships in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Primary Prevention, 14, 187–196.
Rhodes, J. E. (2002). Stand by me: The risks and rewards of mentoring today’s youth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rhodes, J. E., Grossman, J. B., & Resch, N. L. (2000). Agents of change: Pathways through which mentoring relationships influence adolescents’ academic adjustment. Child Development, 71(6), 1662–1671.
Roth, J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). What do adolescents need for healthy development: Implications for youth policy. SRCD Social Policy Report, 14(1), 1–19.
Sipe, C. L. (2000). Mentoring adolescents: What have we learned? Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
Slicker, E. K., & Palmer, D. J. (1993). Mentoring at-risk high school students: Evaluation of a school-based program. School Counselor, 40(5), 327–334.
Stukas, A. A., Clary, G. E., & Snyder, M. (2000). Service learning: Who benefits and why. Social Policy Report: Society for Research in Child Development, 13(4), 1–20.
U.S. Department of Education (1996). Mentoring in schools. In Creating safe and healthy schools: An action guide. Washington, DC: Author.
Wright, L., & Borland, J. H. (1992). A special friend: Adolescent mentors for young, economically disadvantaged, potentially gifted students. Roeper Review, 14(3), 124–129.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karcher, M.J., Nakkula, M.J. & Harris, J. Developmental Mentoring Match Characteristics: Correspondence between Mentors’ and Mentees’ Assessments of Relationship Quality. J Primary Prevent 26, 93–110 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-005-1847-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-005-1847-x