Abstract
Self-assembly of tetracationic porphyrin TMPyP4+ onto polyanionic matrix of inorganic polyphosphate (PPS) in aqueous solutions has been studied in a wide range of molar phosphate-to-dye ratios using techniques of polarized fluorescence, absorption, resonance Raman spectroscopy and static light scattering. The binding of TMPyP4+ to PPS is characterized by the binding constant of 3 × 105 M−1 and the cooperativity parameter of about 150. The fluorescence quenching of the bound TMPyP4+ evidences the stacking of the porphyrine chromophores. Under the stoichiometric binding ratio TMPyP4+ forms extended continuous face-to-face aggregates (so-called H-aggregates) which manifest themselves by a blue shift (12 nm) and a large hypochromisity (51%) of the Soret absorption band. Each face-to-face TMPyP4+ stack is formed with participation of four PPS chains. Formation of such columnar aggregates is promoted by the ability of PPS chains to take a helix conformation where negative charges are arranged along two oppositely situated rows with intercharge distance of 0.36 nm which corresponds to the thickness of the porphyrin π-electronic system. The ability of each PPS strand to be template for formation of two porphyrin stacks results in the integration of the adjacent stacks into higher-order aggregates which dimension was estimated from the fluorescence polarization data.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The phenomenon of molecular aggregation of porphyrins is a subject of considerable attention conditioned by unique electronic and spectroscopic properties as well as the significant role of one-dimensional chromophore self-assemblies in the development of nano-scale molecular devices [1, 2]. Two main types of molecular aggregates formed by porphyrin molecules are known, namely, J- and H-aggregates [3, 4]. In J-aggregates the transition dipoles of the constituent molecules are relatively oriented as “head-to-tail”, so that porphyrin molecules are arranged as “offset card deck” (side-by-side arrangement), and they can be disposed linearly or circularly [5]. Unlike this, in H-aggregates the transition dipoles of the individual monomers are aligned parallel to each other and perpendicular to the line joining their centers, in such a way the porphyrin macrocycles are stacked together face-to-face forming columnar structures [6]. The above two aggregation types have different spectroscopic signatures [7]: the Soret absorption band for porphyrin J-aggregates is red shifted relative to its position in the dye monomeric spectrum, while for H-aggregates it is blue shifted.
Earlier aggregation of tetraaryl-substituted porphyrins which exhibit a tendency to self-associate in aqueous solutions was widely investigated [8–13]. At the same time it has been shown [14, 15] that tetracationic meso-tetrakis(4-N-methyl-pyridyl)porphine (TMPyP4+, Fig. 1a) is incapable to form aggregates or dimers in aqueous solutions owing to electrostatic repulsion of their molecules. However the aggregation of TMPyP4+ occurs when its peripheral positive charges are neutralized under the association with anions. So, it took place in aqueous systems containing sodium borohydride [16] or a calixarene derivative [17], where formation of porphyrin J-aggregates was observed. Extended self-assembly of TMPyP4+ on polyanionic backbones of DNA [18, 19] and polynucleotides [20] obviously also belongs to J-type aggregation. At the same time, extended H-assemblies of this porphyrin in aqueous solution have not been obtained, although its H-dimer or H-tetramer in LB films has been reported [21, 22]. The possible mutual disposition of TMPyP4+ molecules composing J- and H-aggregates is clearly shown in [17].
In the present paper we have provided evidence of the extended H-type self-assembly of TMPyP4+ in aqueous solutions induced by its interaction with polyanionic matrix of inorganic polyphosphate (PPS). PPS represents a linear chain of orthophosphate residues each carrying a monovalent negative charge (Fig. 1b) therefore it can serve as polyanionic scaffold to assemble cationic macromolecules [23]. The rotational flexibility of the P-O-P bonds allows the conformational adjustment of PPS chains to the TMPyP4+ stacks. The aim of the work was the spectroscopic and structural characterization of the TMPyP4+ H-aggregates revealed.
Experimental
The tetra-p-tosylate salt of meso-tetrakis(4-N-methyl-pyridyl)porphine was obtained from Aldrich Chemical Co. and sodium polyphosphate with degree of polymerization approximately 75 was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. The deionized water from Millipore-Q system was used as a solvent for all sample preparations. The porphyrin concentration was determined spectrophotometrically in water using the extinction coefficient of ε424 = 226000 M−1 cm−1 at the Soret band maximum [24]. The PPS concentration was estimated from the dissolved substance weight (1% solution corresponds to 98 mM phosphates).
Electronic absorption spectra were measured on a SPECORD M40 spectrophotometer (VEB Carl Zeiss, Jena). Quantitative measurements of both steady-state fluorescence and light scattering characteristics were carried out by the method of photon counting with a laboratory spectrofluorimeter [25]. The exciting light beam was selected by a double monochromator from stabilized radiation of a Philips halogen lamp. To determine the sample absorbance under the excitation wavelength, the intensity of beam was registered after its passing through the optical cell using a photodiode detector. The fluorescence and light scattering intensities were registered at a right angle to the incident beam. The radiation from small solution volume selected in the centre of the cuvette was collected, so that the emission from the porphyrin molecules adsorbed onto cuvette walls did not hit inside the emission monochromator. Ahrens prisms were used to polarize linearly the exciting beam as well as to analyze the fluorescence polarization and scattered radiation. The spectrofluorimeter was equipped with a quartz depolarizing optical wedge to exclude the monochromator polarization-dependent response. Fluorescence spectra were corrected on the spectral sensitivity of the spectrofluorimeter. When measuring the fluorescence or light scattering intensities, the pulses from photomultiplier tube were accumulated during 10 s for each data point and measurements were repeated five times, at that the measurements error was about 0.5%. A cuvette compartment of the spectrofluorimeter was equipped with a telescope to observe visually aggregation processes in solutions.
The binding of TMPyP4+ to PPS was followed by changes in parameters of the porphyrin fluorescence under titration experiments. The fluorescence of TMPyP4+ was excited at λexc = 500 nm (in the region of the Qy (0,1) absorption band) and its intensity was registered near the maximum of uncorrected emission band, at λ = 677 nm, (the emission spectral slit was 1 nm). The fluorescence intensity, F, and degree of fluorescence polarization, p, were calculated using formulas [26]
where F ∥ and F ⊥ are measured intensities of the emitted light, which are polarized parallel and perpendicular to the polarization direction of the exciting light beam, respectively. The relative quantum yield of the fluorescence was calculated from the equation
where F S0 and F S are integral intensities of TMPyP4+ fluorescence in the free state and in the mixture with PPS, respectively, which are calculated as areas under the corresponding fluorescence spectra; A 0 and A are the absorbances of these samples under λexc.
The aggregation process arisen in the solutions was followed by the intensity of steady-state light scattering (SLS) (both the excitation and emission monochromators were set at λ = 500 nm). The polarized components of the scattering intensity I || and I ⊥ were measured by similar way to measurements of F || and F ⊥, and the depolarization ratio was defined as \( {\rho_{\rm{v}}} = {{{I_\bot }} \mathord{\left/{\vphantom {{{I_\bot }} {{I_\parallel }}}} \right.} {{I_\parallel }}} \).
Resonance Raman spectra were recorded on Raman spectrometer DFS-52 (Russia) equipped with a double monochromator (reverse dispersion 3.5 Å/mm) using the excitation by 457.9 nm emission line of an Ar ion laser (power 25 mW). The Raman signal was collected using conventional 90° geometry and detected with a thermoelectric-cooled (till −30°) CCD camera. The comparative peak positions in the spectra were determined with an accuracy of 0.3 cm−1.
In titration experiments the sample of [TMPyP4+] = 10 µM was added with increasing amounts of the concentrated PPS solution containing the same porphyrin content, whereupon fluorescence and SLS intensities were measured. The time from 7 to 10 min was required to reach the thermodynamic equilibrium in the system which was verified from approach to the stability in the fluorescence or light scattering signal. The aim of titration experiments was to obtain dependences of the fluorescence and light scattering characteristics on the molar phosphate-to-dye ratio, P/D. The experiments were carried out in deionized water and in 0.14 M aqueous solution of NaCl.
All measurements were carried out in quartz cuvettes at room temperature from 22 to 24 °C.
Results and discussion
Fluorescent titration curves
The results of fluorescence titration of TMPyP4+ with PPS are shown in Figs. 2 and 3 as P/D-dependences of the changes in the relative fluorescence intensity, F/F 0 (F 0 is fluorescence intensity of the free porphyrin), and fluorescence polarization degree, p. Both the dye fluorescence quenching and p increase indicate formation of stacking-aggregates by the tetracationic porphyrin molecules on PPS polyanionic matrix. In the case of titration in water without counterions, the fluorescence parameters reach the extreme values: (F/F 0)min = 0.18 at P/D = 5.6 and p max = 0.095 at P/D = 5.2 (Fig. 3). With a further P/D increase the titration curves reflect decomposition of TMPyP4+ aggregates since F/F 0 rises and p goes down. Under P/D ≥ 1,000 these parameters have reached steady levels of F/F 0 = 0.63 and p = 0.034 (Fig. 2). The last value is twice as large as that for the free monomeric dye, p 0 ≈ 0.015. The increased p value evidences that after the decomposition porphyrin molecules remain bound to the polymer. The presence of 0.14 M NaCl in the solution strongly reduces the binding of TMPyP4+ to PPS due to the competitive binding of Na+ ions to the polyanionic matrix. It is evident from the weak fluorescence quenching and small change of p observed for the last sample (Fig. 2). The P/D-dependencies of F/F 0 and p were found to be reproduced when reverse titration experiments were carried out, that is under P/D decrease from highest to zero values. It means that a precipitation of the complexes has not occurred.
Absorption and fluorescence spectra
The visible absorption and fluorescent spectra of the free TMPyP4+ and one bound to PPS are shown in Fig. 4. As can be seen, upon the porphyrin aggregation its absorption spectrum undergoes transformations depending on P/D value. Thus, at P/D = 5.6 corresponding to the maximal fluorescence quenching, the absorbance maximum of the Soret band is decreased by 51% and blue-shifted by 12 nm (from 422 to 410 nm) whereas the Qy(0,1) band is red-shifted by 5 nm (from 518 to 523 nm) with respect to those of the free TMPyP4+. The blue shift and large hypochromisity observed for the Soret band clearly indicate formation of H-aggregates [7]. The wide fluorescence spectrum of the free porphyrin with maximum at ∼712 nm becomes narrowed and splits into distinct Q(0,0) and Q(0,1) fluorescence bands which peaks at ∼667 and ∼727 nm have approximately equal intensities. Such transformation of the fluorescence spectrum can be explained by the reduction of mixing of the porphyrin singlet excited state and CT one (intramolecular charge transfer between π-system of porphyrin macrocycle and pyridinium groups) for the assembled TMPyP4+ molecules, caused by the (1) restriction of the pyridinium groups rotation toward coplanar geometry with the porphine ring or (2) destabilization of the CT state induced by the leaving of the molecules from the water environment [14].
The decrease in the fluorescence intensity evidences that the porphyrin chromophores come into stacking interaction. However, it should be mentioned that in the case of H-type porphyrins aggregation the fluorescence quenching is substantially less then for J-type ones. So, for our system the fluorescence quantum yield is about five times diminished (Q/Q 0 = 0.23). The same effect (Q/Q 0 = 0.22) was also observed earlier for H-aggregates formed by dianionic porphyrin H4TPPS2− [5]. While in the cases of J-type porphyrin aggregation the fluorescence was quenched almost completely, for instance, for H2TPPS4− (Q/Q 0 = 0.008) [5] and TMPyP4+ (the exact Q/Q 0 ratio was not established) [16].
At the very high excess of PPS (P/D ≥ 1,000) the H-aggregates dissociate into monomer molecules bound to PPS. However, their absorbance has not revert to the shape of the free dye spectrum showing the hypochromicity of ∼23% and ∼2 nm blue shift of the Soret band maximum. The fluorescence spectrum also differs from that for the free dye displaying a decreased intensity. Thus, at P/D = 1,200 we have registered Q/Q 0 ≈ 0.8. Such changes in spectroscopic properties of the bound monomeric porphyrin are presumably caused by the effect of neutralization of the positive charges at the N-methylpyridyl moieties under their interaction with the PO- groups of PPS. Such an effect was earlier observed under binding of TMPyP4+ to poly(L-glutamic acid) [27].
Light scattering
The aggregation process arising under binding TMPyP4+ to PPS in water solutions without NaCl is readily observable from SLS measurements since it induces significant light scattering effect which can be clearly seen visually via a telescope. As shown in Fig. 5, in the initial part of titration curve (under low P/D values) the SLS intensity increases proportionally to P/D, reaching a maximal value at P/D = 5.3 ± 0.1 where the extreme fluorescence parameters (F/F 0 ) min and p max are observed. Then it gradually went down with P/D. At P/D = 2,300 SLS intensity amounts to only twice as much scattering signal from the porphyrin solution without PPS. Also we watched via a telescope the change in the sample viscosity during the titration experiments, namely from the damping of a solution rotational movement after the sample stirring. The viscosity was found to be not essentially increased indicating that the aggregates have not formed a network in solution. The SLS in the solution with 0.14 M NaCl is not substantially increased due to the competitive binding of Na+ ions which prevent TMPyP4+ binding to PPS as it was established by the fluorescent measurements.
The SLS depolarization ratio for the aggregates is found to be of ρV(90) = 0.033 ± 0.002 (see inset in Fig. 5). For comparison, for TMPyP4+ alone the value ρV(90) = 0.003 ± 0.001 has been obtained. The very small value of the depolarization ratio for monomers shows that the porphyrin molecules are optically highly isotropic. The tenfold increase of ρV(90) for the PPS-TMPyP4+ complexes signifies increase of the molecular anisotropy under H-stacks formation.
Resonance Raman spectra
Resonance Raman (RR) spectra of free TMPyP4+ and its complex with PPS under P/D = 5.6 (where the H-aggregates are formed) were obtained in the range of 750–1,300 cm−1 (see Fig. 6) where vibrations of pyrrol and pyridilic rings become apparent. The small changes in the pattern of RR spectra upon the the porphyrin aggregation were found. The stretching vibrations of the porphyrin macrocycle near 970 and 1,005 cm−1 assigned to ν(Ca–Cb) and ν(Ca–Cm), respectively [28] are shifted by 2 cm−1 to lower frequencies. Changes in vibrations attributed to the N-methylpyridyl group are also revealed. The frequencies of stretching vibration of bonds N+-CH3 near 795 cm−1 and Cm-pyr near 1,250 cm−1 are decreased by 1–2 cm−1. The downward shifts of RR bands attributed to the porphyrin N-methylpyridyl ring suggest the existence of an electrostatic interaction between their N+-CH3 groups and PPS PO- groups in the aggregate formed. Such slight changes in the vibration frequencies (1–2 cm−1) are typical for the Coulomb interaction [29].
Parameters of the cooperative binding
The curve of F/F 0 dependence on P/D under the titration in deionized water (Fig. 3) has the shape typical for cooperative binding of cationic dyes to linear polyanions [30–32]. The straight line part of this curve corresponds to stoichiometric binding conditions. Being extrapolated to the level line of (F/F 0 )min it produces the intersection point positioned at P/D = 5.2 which determines the value of stoichiometric ratio of the complex formation. Of course, it is valid in the case if all porphyrin is bound. Our measurements performed under five times reduced porphyrin concentration, 2 µM, have not revealed an increase in (F/F 0 )min within experimental error (not shown) that would be in the case of not enough efficient binding. Thus it is allowable to neglect the fraction of unbound dye.
Using results of fluorescent titration experiment in the presence of 0.14 M Na+ ions we have calculated the apparent binding constant for the interaction of TMPyP4+ with PPS in deionized water, K, using the known binding constant for Na+ (K 1 = 1,100 M−1) [33]. For competitive binding of two different ligands interacting with the same linear lattice McGhee and von Hippel [34] have derived an equation, which in our case of Na+ ion as the competitor occupying one lattice site, i.e. one phosphate group, is [35]
where r is the “binding density” and n is the number of PPS phosphates per binding site; C f and C 1 are concentrations of the free porphyrin and Na+ respectively. Under used Na+ concentration of 0.14 M this kind of ions is in a huge excess in comparison with the polymer content. Since the fraction of bound Na+ ions is negligibly small in comparison with its total content, we can accepts C1 value to be equal to 0.14 M. It was supposed that each of four positively charged pyridyl group of the porphyrin interacts with one phosphate group of different PPS chain, thus n = 1. The value of apparent binding constant K = 3 × 105 M−1 was calculated from the Eq. 3 using the experimental data at P/D = 5.2. Here the fraction of bound porphyrin in the solution with 0.14 M Na+ was determined as γb = 0.05, and the number of bound ligands per matrix unit was \( r = {{{\gamma_b}D} \mathord{\left/{\vphantom {{{\gamma_b}D} P}} \right.} P} \approx 0.01 \). K is the cooperative binding constant equal to K m q, where K m is the monomeric binding constant and q is the binding cooperativity parameter. Taking into account the value of K m ≈ 2,000 M−1 for the electrostatic binding of monocationic dyes to PPS [33], we have obtained q ≈ 150.
Model and size of aggregates
The conformation analysis of the PPS shows that the polymer chain can take a helix shape where negatively charged \( {\hbox{PO}}_2^{-} \) groups are arranged along two oppositely situated rows with intercharge distance of 0.36 nm. The possible structure of such helix is represented in Fig. 7, where P-O bond length of 0.156 nm taken from X-ray diffraction data [36] as well as valence angle between P-O bonds of 109.5° [37] were used. Indicated above intercharge distance corresponds both to the thickness of the porphyrin π-electronic system and to interplanar distance between adjacent porphyrin molecules involved in the π–π stacking-interaction (0.34–0.36 nm) [38]. Therefore under the binding of TMPyP4+ to PPS matrix where positively charged N-methylpyridyl groups of the porphyrin electrostatically interact with negatively charged oxygen atoms of PPS, the spatial arrangement of the polymer negative charges promotes formation of continuous porphyrin stacking-aggregates (two stacks per one PPS molecule). Since the porphyrin molecule is highly symmetric (D2h symmetry) and its four positive charges are oppositely situated, it is supposed that four PPS chains involved in formation of each one-dimensional face-to-face TMPyP4+ stack. It is logically possible to suppose that planes of two consecutive molecules in the stack are twisted alternately in the opposite direction (Fig. 8) to prevent the steric hindrance between the methylpyridyl groups of adjacent porphyrins. It can occur since distance between two oxygen atoms belonging to the O-P-O group is approximately 0.2 nm (see the cross-section of the helix in Fig. 7b) and each of them can form ion pair with the methylpyridyl moiety.
The appearance of the strong light scattering by the sample evidences the formation of macroclusters in the solution studied. Here we propose the possible model of this process. An ability of each PPS strand to be a template for formation of two porphyrin stacks (Fig. 9a) induces an integration of adjacent stacks into higher-order columnar aggregates (Fig. 9b), where each stack is displaced relative to another one by half of porphyrin interplanar distance. For PPS with polymerization degree of 75 the length of the column under the stoichiometric binding is \( L \approx 0.36 \times {{76} \mathord{\left/{\vphantom {{75} 2}} \right.} 2} = 13.5 \) nm. Supposing that each column represents rodlike particle we have obtained its radius, R, using Tirado and Garcia de la Torre’s relation for rotation of rigid circular cylinder around its axis [39]
where T and η are the temperature and viscosity of medium (water at 22 °C), and the end-effect correction was neglected. A rotation diffusion coefficient θ was calculated from the relation
Here ρ is the rotational relaxation time which have been obtained from fluorescence polarization data using Perrin equation [26]
where τ is the fluorescence lifetime; p and p 1 are the fluorescence polarization degree with and without the molecular rotation correspondingly. The value p 1 = 0.125 determined for TMPyP4+ in glycerol solution at −12 °C under λexc = 500 nm was used. Since up to now fluorescence lifetime value for H-aggregates formed by TMPyP4+ is not determined experimentally, and at the same time it is known [5] that lifetime of H-aggregate formed by H4TPPS2− porphyrin is approximately twice as much as its monomer value, we have used τ ∼ 10 ns which is equal to a doubled lifetime value for monomeric TMPyP4+ determined experimentally as 5.1 ns [14]. From Eq. 6 using p = p max = 0.095 we have calculated ρ = 91 ns, which corresponds to a rotational diffusion coefficient θ = 0.0055 ns−1. Using this θ value and Eq. 4, LR 2 ≈ 80 nm3 was found. In such a way, for L ≈ 13.5 nm a diameter of the column is equal to approximately 5 nm. Assuming the distance between two oppositely situated positively charged nitrogen atoms belonging to methylpyridyl groups of TMPyP4+ molecule as 1.6 nm, it was estimated that 3 porphyrin molecules are arranged across the diameter of the column and correspondingly 9 ones are disposed in the its cross-section (Fig. 9b). At the same time the porphyrin molecules belonging to the adjacent stacks are mutually displaced in vertical direction by half of their interplanar distance (Fig. 9a). In such a way, as it is seen from Fig. 9b, 9 porphyrin molecules share 48 PPS residues resulted in the phosphate/TMPyP4+ ratio of 5.3, that is in good conformity with the stoichiometric binding ratio 5.2 obtained from the fluorescent titration curve. Thus, it is easy to calculate that 9 porphyrin stacks are combined into the columnar macrocluster consisting of 9 L/0.36 ≈ 340 monomeric units.
Conclusions
In the present study a formation of extended face-to-face TMPyP4+ aggregates (H-aggregates) in water is revealed under the porphyrin stoichiometric binding to inorganic polyphosphate. The process is characterized by the binding constant of 3 × 105 M−1 and the cooperativity parameter of about 150. Formation of such columnar aggregates is induced by the ability of PPS chains to take a helix conformation where negative charges are arranged along two oppositely situated rows with intercharge distance of 0.36 nm, which corresponds to the interplanar distance between adjacent porphyrin molecules involved in the π–π stacking-interaction. This aggregation results in the near five-fold quenching of TMPyP4+ fluorescence. An ability of each PPS strand to be a template for formation of two porphyrin stacks results in the integration of the adjacent stacks into higher-order columnar macroclusters which dimension depends on the length of PPS chain. In our case of PPS with polymerization degree of 75 the length of the column and its diameter were estimated to be equal to 13.5 nm and 5 nm correspondingly. The plausible model of H-type TMPyP4+ aggregates on the polyanionic PPS template is presented. According this model, 9 one-dimensional porphyrin stacks joined by 24 PPS strands are combined into the columnar macrocluster consisting of approximately 340 porphyrin monomeric units. The phosphate-to-porphyrin ratio calculated for such columnar structure is equal to 5.3. It is in good conformity with the stoichiometric binding ratio of 5.2 obtained from the fluorescent titration curve. The presence of NaCl in the solution reduces the efficiency of TMPyP4+ aggregation due to the competitive binding of Na+ ions to PPS.
References
Lindsey JS (1991) New J Chem 15:153–180
Engelkamp H, Middelbeek S, Nolte RJM (1999) Science 284:785–788
Harvey PD (2003) In: Kadish KM, Smith KM, Gulliard R (eds) The porphyrin handbook. Vol. 18 / Multiporphyrins, Multiphthalocyanines and Arrays. Academic, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 63–250
Akins DL (1996) In: Kobayashi T (ed) J-aggregates. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 67–94
Maiti NC, Mazumdar S, Periasamy N (1998) J Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 2:369–376
Shirakawa M, Kawano S, Fujita N, Sada K, Shinkai S (2003) J Org Chem 68:5037–5044
Aguilera OV, Neckers DC (1989) Acc Chem Res 22:171–177
Ohno O, Kaizu Y, Kobayashi H (1993) J Chem Phys 99:4128–4139
Akins DL, Zhu H-R, Guo C (1994) J Phys Chem 98:3612–3618
Maiti NC, Ravicanth M, Mazumdar S, Periasamy N (1995) J Phys Chem 99:17192–17197
Akins DL, Zhu H-R, Guo C (1996) J Phys Chem 100:5420–5425
Misali N, Scolaro LM, Romeo A, Mallamace F (1998) Phys Rev E 57:5766–6170
Collings PJ, Gibbs EJ, Starr TE, Vafek O, Yee C, Pomerance LA, Pasternack RF (1999) J Phys Chem B 103:8474–8481
Vergeldt FJ, Koehorst RBM, van Hoek A, Schaafsma TJ (1995) J Phys Chem 99:4397–4405
Dixon DW, Steullet V (1998) J Inorg Biochem 69:25–32
Šišková K, Vlčková B, Mojzeš P (2005) J Mol Struct 744–747:265–272
Miguel G, Pérez-Morales M, Martin-Romero MT, Munoz E, Richardson TH, Camacho L (2007) Langmuir 23:3794–3801
Sazanovich IV, Chirvony VS (2005) Quantum Elec 35:756–760
Pasternack RF, Goldsmith JI, Szép S, Gibbs EJ (1998) Biophys J 75:1024–1031
Uno T, Hamasaki K, Tanigawa M, Shimabayashi S (1997) Inorg Chem 36:1676–1683
Martin MT, Prieto I, Camacho L, Möbius D (1996) Langmuir 12:6554–6560
Prieto I, Pedrosa JM, Martin-Romero MT, Möbius D, Camacho L (2000) J Phys Chem B 104:9966–9972
Brown MRW, Kornberg A (2004) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:16085–16087
Pasternack RF, Bustamante C, Collings PJ, Giannetto A, Gibbs EJ (1993) J Am Chem Soc 115:5393–5399
Zozulya V, Blagoi Yu, Lober G, Voloshin I, Winter S, Makitruk V, Shalamay A (1997) Biophys Chem 65:55–63
Lakowicz JR (2006) Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy, 3rd edn. Springer, New York
Ikeda S, Nezu T, Ebert G (1991) Biopolymers 31:1257–1263
Blom N, Odo J, Nakamoto K (1986) J Phys Chem 90:2847–2852
Schneider JH, Odo J, Nakamoto K (1988) Nucl Acids Res 16:10323–10338
Schwarz G, Klose S (1972) Eur J Biochem 29:249–256
Zozulya VN, Voloshin IM (1994) Biophys Chem 48:353–358
Balcarová Z, Kleinwächter V, Koudelka J, Klarner R, Löber G (1978) Biophys Chem 8:17–25
Zozulya VN, Fyodorov VF, Blagoi YuP (1990) Stud Biophys 137:17–28
McGhee JD, von Hippel PH (1974) J Mol Biol 86:469–489
Riemer SC, Bloomfield VA (1979) Biopolymers 18:1695–1708
Yin Z, Kasrai M, Bancroft M, Tan KH, Feng X (1995) Phys Rev B 51:742–750
Strauss UP, Smith EH, Wineman PL (1953) J Am Chem Soc 75:3935–3940
Hunter CA, Sanders JKM (1990) J Am Chem Soc 112:5525–5534
Tirado MM, Garcia de la Torre J (1980) J Chem Phys 73:1986–1993
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Professor V. S. Chirvony for helpful discussion of the results obtained.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zozulya, V.N., Ryazanova, O.A., Voloshin, I.M. et al. Spectroscopic Detection of Tetracationic Porphyrin H-Aggregation on Polyanionic Matrix of Inorganic Polyphosphate. J Fluoresc 20, 695–702 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-010-0609-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-010-0609-1