Abstract
Environmental stringent norms, weight reduction, and the ever-depleting mode of petroleum resources have stimulated the use of textile-based natural fibres as reinforcement in polymeric composites. Natural fibres play a significant role in the sustainability of an environmentally friendly future. Natural fibres-based composites have fulfilled the environmental norms and contribute to developing lightweight materials with improved mechanical properties in the automotive sector. The automotive industry is yielding substantial steps towards a more environmentally friendly product by adopting textile fibres as a reinforcement for making various automotive parts, such as door panels, boot lining, instrument panel support, sun visor, wheel box, interior insulation, trunk panel, roof cover, and bumper. The growth rate of natural fibre production is increasing day by day. Each year, high energy-consuming products and synthetic fibres-based composites are being replaced by natural fibre-reinforced polymeric composites because natural fibre-based composites have excellent mechanical properties, relatively low cost (one-third of the cost of glass fibre), low density, and recyclability. This review analysis contributes an overview of the concept of vehicle weight reduction, properties required for composite materials to be used for automotive, most commercially used natural fibres and their use for automotive applications focusing on the matrices for the natural fibre composites (NFCs), natural fibre properties and potential challenges coupled with the use of natural fibres, surface modification methods of some natural fibres being used in the automotive industry and recent advancements in textile fibre-reinforced composites. Thermal properties and processing techniques of natural fibre-reinforced composites (NFRC) are also studied.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The shortage of fossil fuel is increasing rapidly, while their supply is irresolute and the new necessity of environmental sustainability to counter global warming has employed much enforcement on researchers to develop new materials and manufacturing processes for distribution of goods via air, sea, and land. Lightweight with strength is the biggest challenge for structures, which results in lower energy consumption from the vehicles. While textile-based composite materials and plastic are being used in automotive nowadays, they contribute just about 7.5% of the vehicle's total mass, and their applications are not for the primary vehicle structure [1]. Substantial reasons for the rapid espousal of polymeric matrix composites (PMC) [2] are the light weight (31–40% lighter than aluminium parts of equal strength, 40–60% lighter than metallic components of equal strength), high specific stiffness, and specific strength compared to metals, improved safety and crashworthiness, corrosion resistance, excellent energy absorbing capability by mass, no machining and welding, better damage resistance, reduced tooling cost, part consolidation opportunities, design flexibility, improved internal damping, and material anisotropy, etc. Although the substantial edge of polymer matrix composites has been recognized by the automotive manufacturing sector, there are several crucial defiances before their wide application in primary vehicle structures. Challenges like recyclability, slow production rates, high material costs, and the lack of experience of the auto industries with composite materials are the main issues that auto engineers are facing currently [3,4,5]. Glass and carbon fibres are the most demanding reinforcements for PMC. Das et al. [5] reported that the glass fibre-reinforced polymeric composites (GFRPC) contribute 1% of total vehicle mass, and its use as structural parts could reduce vehicle weight by 20–36%; more significantly, the carbon fibre-reinforced polymeric composites (CFRPC) contribute 0.007% of total vehicle mass (except special vehicles like F1 cars), and its use could reduce vehicle weight by 40– 60%. While in the automotive industry, the use of GFRPC has been increased to replace conventional metals [6, 7], the usage rate for CFRPC, which are light in weight, stiffer, and stronger than GFRPC, remains low because of its high cost; that’s why CFRPC are only used in luxury cars (F1 cars) and aerospace applications. Apart from the aerospace industry, where payload capacity and engine efficiency are the most important concerns, the high-mass production of the automotive sector results in the paramount consideration of being cost beneficial that overwrites any technical factors [8]. Cost-cutting is one of the major tasks which is being continuously faced by automotive manufacturers while fuel-saving and technology transformation is also becoming more important [9]. NFRC are emerging as a feasible alternative to GFRPC, especially in the automotive sector. Natural fibre-based composites have recently attracted the researcher’s attention because of their various advantages over GFRPC. Advantages of natural fibres over conventional reinforcement are biodegradability, low cost, superior thermal properties, low density, comparable specific mechanical properties, recyclability, high toughness, lower energy consumption, non-irritation to the skin, reduced tool wear, and carbon dioxide sequestration. Natural fibres are economical and promising as compared to traditional synthetic fibres. This is why NFRC are attracting significant interest due to their potential to reduce carbon emission by replacing conventional synthetically produced materials, such as glass fibre, which costs more and is also harmful to the planet. For developing countries like India, natural fibres provide a possibility to utilize their own natural resources in their various composite processing industries. Industrial ecology, sustainability, green chemistry, and eco-efficiency are forcing automotive manufacturers to seek alternative materials that are eco-friendlier for automotive applications. Many environmental issues will need to be solved for composites fabricated using natural fibres with biopolymers (plastics). Embedding natural fibres with biopolymers such as starch plastic, cellulosic plastic, soy-based plastic, and corn-based plastic are continuously being developed by researchers [10]. Textile structural reinforced polymeric composites (TSRPC) are reinforced by textile structures committed for load-bearing applications. These textile structural composites (TSC) must have a textile-based structure (act as a preform for composites) along with a matrix and must have the potential to withstand primary and secondary load in automotive. The principal objective of (TSC) envisions the utilization of textile-based structures in composite fabrication in order to achieve lightweight composites, advanced composites, and load-bearing composites. In textile structural reinforced polymeric three-dimensional (3D) composites, constituent yarns are arranged in such a manner that they make a right angle to each other in three mutually perpendicular planes, in which two yarns (i.e., warp and weft) are positioned in X and Y directions, whereas the third yarn binds the weft (transverse set of yarns in the fabric) and warp (longitudinal set of yarns in the fabric) yarns in Z direction which provides better structural integrity, having substantial thickness higher than yarn diameter, higher fibre volume fraction (45–50%) without any crimp in the yarns [11]. A minimal effort has been put up so far towards textile fibre-reinforced aluminium metal matrix composites (TFRAMMC) by the scientific community. TFRAMMC are those which are reinforced by textile fibre in aluminium matrix committed for load-bearing applications. These composites must have textile fibre (acting as reinforcement) and aluminium matrix; they must have the potential to withstand primary and secondary load in automotive. Aluminium-based metal matrix composites reinforced with textile fibre in the aluminium matrix have many advantages such as superior strength to weight ratio, high modulus, excellent creep, wear, and fatigue properties. Aluminium-based composite materials have high potential applications in the automotive sector (piston rod, valve train, piston pin, crankshaft, cylinder head, cylinder blocks, and engine blocks).
Recent market trends of NFRC
Currently, many industries use composites for various products. Initiatives and stringent environmental regulations have been put in place in many countries to push many markets towards more eco-friendly materials and processing. The market sectors that use natural fibre-based composites cover a majority of products. In Fig. 1, market consumption of NFCs in various sectors shows the variety of areas where NFRC are being used. Currently, the biggest market which uses bio-composite materials is the construction sector.
The automotive industry has always been a large driving force to create natural fibre-based composites. With advancements in natural fibre-based composite and bio-composites developed by the automotive industry in the 1990s, the awareness and performance have grown, attracting other markets towards the idea of NFRC to replace man-made fibre-based composites. The production of synthetic fibres depends heavily on the petrochemical-based resources that are quickly draining as well; they produce harmful by-products and waste, which are also a bearing force on the sustainability aspect of landfills [13, 14]. Other sectors, such as the construction sector, are also currently using natural fibre-based composites as well. The market has quickly grown with faster production, increasing demand while maintaining similar properties has attracted the need for sustainable products. Flooring, decking, siding, and railings are examples of products in the construction sector that began to use NFCs successfully in the commercial market. Even though various industries and manufacturers are using more eco-friendly materials nowadays, the auto industry is the most influential. The automotive industry has involved other companies in producing NFRC. The processing methods involved in the manufacturing of natural fibre-based composites are comparable to that of synthetic composites. Extrusion and injection moulding can be used, so no new processing methods need to be developed to manufacture actual final products [15]. By combining these techniques, many auto producers such as Daimler Chrysler have been able to acquaint large-scale production lines using natural fibres. A line has been started by Daimler Chrysler that produces exterior body panels for the Mercedes A-class that consumes 40 MT of NFRC a year. Their product lines provide panels that reduce weight by approximately 8% and decrease costs by 6% from their synthetic counterparts [13].
Vehicle weight reduction analysis
The CO2 emission regulation and fuel efficiency of passenger cars are two prime concerns nowadays. To address rising concerns about fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emission (GHG) by passenger vehicles, vehicle weight reduction (VWR) is a well-known strategy. The best way to enhance a car's fuel efficiency without sacrificing safety is to incorporate textile-based fibre-reinforced composite materials in the car body panels because textile fibre-reinforced composite (TFRC) materials have higher specific mechanical properties than those of conventional materials like steel. Vehicle weight reductions can be achieved in three ways:
-
(i)
Material substitution
-
(ii)
Vehicle redesign
-
(iii)
Vehicle downsizing.
Weight reduction in a vehicle can be achieved by material substitution; it involves substituting steel and iron used in automotive vehicles with lighter weight-saving materials like polymer composites, plastics, aluminium, and magnesium. By maintaining the same passenger space, vehicle weight reduction can also be achieved by redesigning the vehicle to optimize the engine size and other parts or to reduce exterior vehicle dimensions, followed by improving the vehicle’s packaging. Finally, downsizing can also provide further vehicle weight reduction; it involves the transition of vehicles from larger and heavier size segments to compact and lighter segment vehicle categories. The use of composite materials has been increasing rapidly in the automotive sector nowadays. The use of composite materials consists of the bumper, chassis parts, A-pillar, B-pillar, C-pillar, seat frame, engine hoods, driveshafts, doors, rooftop, floor pan, leaf springs, brake discs, fuel tanks, lift gates, and so on. It was reported that a 10% reduction in weight from the vehicle’s total weight results in an improvement in fuel consumption by 6–7% [16, 17]. Ishikawa et al. [18] reported that 50% weight reduction could be achieved by using carbon fibre-reinforced composite materials instead of conventional materials in chassis and car body panels. Furthermore, about 20 g/km of CO2 emission reduction occurs for every 100 kg of vehicle’s weight reduction [18]. In current times, various automotive industries are trying to shift towards composites. Some of these have been using semi-structural and non-structural automotive components like dashboards, bumpers, door trims, etc. But nowadays, the challenge is to substitute metals in structural and load-bearing components. The use of TFRC materials in structural and load-bearing components is very limited to date. For automotive structural applications, textile fibre-reinforced structural composite materials (TFRSCM) are an excellent substitute due to their resistance to corrosion, high specific strength, low maintenance, and especially fatigue resistance. TFRSCM reinforced with integrated preform structure made of natural fibres, high-performance fibres (glass, basalt, carbon, etc.) provide an effective solution to substitute the metals in automotive in the near future.
Theoretical analysis of weight reduction in vehicles
It is a known fact that there is a reduction in vehicle’s fuel consumption by reducing the vehicle’s weight, which results in an improvement in fuel efficiency of the vehicle because as the vehicle mass reduces, the vehicle’s engine has to overcome less tractive forces during acceleration, resulting in a lesser amount of work which is needed to be done to run the vehicle. The mathematical Eq. (1), which explains the relationship between vehicle fuel consumption and tractive forces, is given below [19].
where FC: Vehicle fuel consumption (L/km), be: Engine Specific fuel consumption (L/kWh), P: Engine power output (kW), V: Vehicle instantaneous speed (m/s, km/hr), Ft: Tractive force (KN), η: Drive Train Efficiency, T: Time (hr or s).
For a vehicle given time-speed trace and presuming that the engine efficiency and specific fuel consumption which are the functions of load and speed are known, the variable that affects the amount of power output needed from an engine is the amount of tractive forces or resistive forces which the vehicle has to overcome. The total tractive force is the sum of tire rolling resistance, braking or acceleration resistance, climbing resistance, and aerodynamics drag.
For an accelerating vehicle, total resistive or tractive force is given by Eq. 2.
where FRoll = Rolling resistance [N].
FAcc = Acceleration resistance [N]
FDrag = Aerodynamic drag [N]
f = Coefficient of rolling resistance
m = Vehicle and payload mass [kg]
g = Gravitational acceleration [m/s2]
a = Vehicle acceleration [m/s2]
CD = Drag coefficient
Ρair = Density of air [kg/m3]
A = Frontal area of vehicle [m2]
v = Vehicle instantaneous speed [m/s]
From the above mathematical expression, we can identify how a vehicle’s mass has a direct impact on lowering the total resistive or traction force and thus the fuel consumption. However, weight appears in acceleration and rolling components of total tractive forces. The national research council reported a 10% reduction in vehicle weight could enhance fuel consumption by 7–8% [20]. Many automotive industries are trying to explore the possibility of reducing the vehicle’s weight by material substitution, and it involves substituting heavier steel and iron used in vehicles with TFRC materials.
Weight reduction analysis for automotive components
On the component level, the amount of mass savings resulting from using composite materials in any vehicle element depends on the design intent and application. For instance, let us assume that a component in the shape of a rectangular bar is made of a particular material (shown in Fig. 2) having a thickness (t1) and it is replaced with another material having a thickness (t2) so that the bending stiffness of both the materials is maintained to be same. In this case, so as to maintain the bending stiffness constant, the volume of the component will change. If the length and breadth of the rectangular bar are unaltered, then the change in total volume will be reflected in the thickness of the component.
Let,
ρ1 and ρ2 be the density of the component before and after replacement.
l and b be its length and breadth, respectively,
t1, v1, and m1 be the thickness, volume, and mass of the component before replacement.
t2, v2, and m2 be the thickness, volume, and mass of the component after replacement.
E1 and E2 be the modulus of elasticity of the two materials before and after replacement.
The volume and mass of the component before replacement will be,
According to the assumption, the bending stiffness of the component should be the same before and after replacement. Then the ratio of thickness can be given by Eq. (4).
The volume of the component after replacement can be given by,
Mass of the component after replacement,
Dividing Eq. 6 by Eq. 3,
Equation 7 gives the mass of the component after replacing material 1 with material 2.
Properties required in composite materials to be used in automotive
There are three prime factors that need to be looked upon before adopting a material for design in the automotive sector. These are:
-
Performance of material
-
Government regulations
-
Customer requirements
The material should be selected in such a manner that it should have the following properties: high strength, low density, stiffness, corrosion resistance, damage tolerance, fatigue resistance, resistance to impact, temperature resistance, toughness, chemical resistance, electrical resistance, and processability. Furthermore, government regulations (lightweight, fuel efficiency, crash performance, and CO2 emission) and customer requirements (quality features and cost) should also be considered while selecting composite materials. The mechanical performance of the composites is a function of the reinforcing phase, but the matrix phase also makes its own significant contribution to properties. The selection of the resin influences the ability to conduct heat and current by the composites. The mechanical strength of the composite materials is not governed by the reinforcing phase alone, but the synergistic effect of both the matrix and reinforcing phase plays a significant role. The behaviour of matrix material is usually ductile in nature. As the fragmented ends of the fibres are pulled out apart, plastic flow or elastic deformation of the matrix phase exerts shear forces, which results in a slow build-up of stresses into the fragments. Because of this type of load transfer, the reinforcing fibres continue to provide some strength to the composite. So, the composite can withstand more stresses without fracturing. The synergy effect between fibres and matrix can thus toughen and strengthen the composite by increasing the work done required to fracture it [21].
Vehicle mass breakdown
Figure 3 shows the break-up of an automotive component-wise weight, and Table 1 represents the various systems and their sub-components. The mass of a given vehicle can be reduced by its functional vehicle system or by its material composition. An approximate mass breakdown of different vehicle systems and variation seen in the various existing designs of vehicles. The vehicle's body is one of the vehicle's vital systems, or sometimes it is named as the “Body-in-White”. The body of the vehicle represents the core structural frame of the vehicle, contributing about a quarter mass of the overall vehicle weight. The other two well-known vehicle categories are the suspension and the powertrain system; both systems contribute about 1/5th to 1/4th of the total vehicle weight. After these systems, the interior, closures, and other miscellaneous (including lighting, electronic, thermal, etc.) contribute to the remaining vehicle systems.
Properties of natural fibres and their potential
Figure 4 shows the general structural configuration of natural fibre, and it covers mainly three structural elements, i.e., cellulose, lignin, and hemicellulose [23, 24]. Plant fibres consist of hollow cellulose crystalline microfibrils held together by the lignin and hemicellulose as a matrix; thus, they are considered as composites. Each category of plant fibres has its own distinct fibre attributes where the cell wall is not homogenous, and they possess complex structural configurations made up of several layers. It consists of four walls, i.e., the primary wall at the circumference and three secondary walls located at the innermost side followed by lumen at the core since mechanical properties of the fibre are controlled by its thickness [25, 26]. The primary cell wall is made up of a cellulosic amorphous microfibril network arranged in a disorganized manner. The secondary walls are made up of three different layers in which cellulosic crystalline microfibrils having a length of 10–30 nm are helically arranged in a well-organized manner. The microfibrillar angle is the angle between the fibre axis and the microfibrils that varies from one fibre to another. The mechanical properties and quality (dexterity, smoothness) of any fibre are influenced by microfibrillar angle [27]. In the cell wall, an amorphous matrix is made up of hemicellulose, lignin, and pectin. There is a hydrogen bond between the cellulose molecule and hemicellulose, and this acts as a cementing matrix between the cellulose crystalline microfibrils to form the major structural element, which is known as the hemicellulose-cellulose network arrangement. Due to the hydrophilic behaviour of natural fibres and hydrophobic behaviour of the polymer matrix interfacial adhesion is poor between them so natural fibres require some chemical treatment so as to reduce their hydrophilic feature.
Natural fibres are continuous filaments that are employed in the manufacture of rope, yarn, fabric, cords, and carpets. Natural fibres can be compressed into sheets to produce paper or used as a reinforcement phase in composites. Ahmad et al. [28] categorized textile fibres into two types: natural and man-made. Natural fibres are obtained mainly from three subcategories: animals, plants, and minerals. Plant fibres are subdivided into stem or bast, leaf or grass, seed, stalk, and fruit fibres, and these are obtained from the vegetative parts of the plants. Animal fibres are subdivided into wool or hair and silk fibres. Mineral fibre like asbestos is used for housing applications, while animal fibres like wool and silk are widely studied. To get a crystal-clear idea, the classification of textile fibres is presented in Fig. 5. The chemical composition and physical properties of various natural fibres and synthetic fibres are shown in Tables 2 and 3. The physical properties of natural fibres are of great importance. For example, the strength of the composite can significantly be affected by the aspect ratio of fibres (length/diameter ratio); high aspect ratios lead to more strength.
Other properties
Thermal properties of NFCs
Thermal conductivity
In industries such as automotive, packaging, and construction, the use of heat insulating materials is an effective way to cut energy costs and increase industrial efficiency [33]. Lumens, or hollow spaces filled with air are found in natural fibres. These results, as the fibre content in composite increases, the thermal conductivity of the composite material decreases. Several researches have been conducted to examine the thermal conductivity of NFCs. Pujari et al. [34] investigated the thermal conductivity of chopped banana and jute fibres/epoxy composites fabricated by hand lay-up technique and found that the banana and jute fibre chopped composites had thermal conductivities of 0.227 and 0.230 W/m K in the range of −20 °C to 300 °C and at the maximum fibre volume fraction, respectively. The thermal conductivity of NFCs with varying fibre percentage is shown in Fig. 6 [34]. Li et al. [35] reported that an increase in fibre loading decreased the thermal conductivity of a chopped flax fibre/high density polyethylene (HDPE) composite fabricated by extrusion moulding method. Osugi et al. [36] and Ramanaiah et al. [37] found the same result for unidirectional hemp fibre/epoxy composite fabricated by compression moulding method and unidirectional fish tail palm fibre/polyester composites fabricated by hand lay-up technique, respectively. The thermal conductivity of chopped banana fibre/polypropylene (PP) composite fabricated by compression moulding method was assessed by Paul et al. [38]. The results revealed that when the fibre percentage in composite increased, the thermal conductivity of the composite decreased. Agarwal et al. [39] studied the effect of chemical treatment of fibre on the thermal conductivity of oil palm fibre/phenolic reinforced composite. The results revealed that alkali and silane treatment improved the thermal conductivity of composite material than acetylation treatment, implying that acetylation treatment is more suitable than alkali and silane treatment to improve the thermal insulation properties of composite materials.
Fire resistance
When exposed to heat, polymer matrix degrades quickly [40]. At high temperatures, fibre reinforcement may improve the thermal stability of polymeric composites. The loss of strength and stiffness of NFCs at high temperature is one of their weakness [41]. When NFCs are subjected to fire, they undergo thermal decomposition and combustion. The flammability of NFCs varies with different types of natural fibres because their microstructures and chemical compositions are different. The fire resistance of NFCs can be improved by lowering the cellulose content of fibre, improving crystallinity, and lowering polymerization of composites [41]. The fire resistance of NFCs can also be improved by using coatings and additives, such as ceramics, silicone, intumescents, ablation, phenolics, and glass mats. Heating the intumescent materials beyond a certain temperature causes foaming and expansion to form a cellular and charred surface, which protects the underlying surface from heat and flames. The fire resistance of the composites can be increased by the addition of talc and nanoparticles as filler to the NFCs by forming heat barriers. The behaviour of NFCs at higher temperature has been investigated by several researchers. Some studies have been reported that natural fibre starts to degrade at about 220 °C [42,43,44,45]. However, lignin degrades at around 200 °C, while cellulose and hemicellulose degrades at higher temperature [46]. Table 4 shows the temperature at which major natural fibres decompose, and Table 5 shows melting point and glass transition of some resin used in NFCs.
Matrices for NFCs
In composites, a matrix is used to bind the reinforcing phase together. The main functions of the matrix are the environmental tolerance, surface appearance, and overall durability of the composites, while most of the structural loads are carried by the fibrous reinforcement phase, thus imparting strength and stiffness to the composite. In composites, stress distribution from a matrix to fibres directly affects mechanical properties [49, 50]. The distribution of fibres and interfacial adhesion across the matrix and reinforcing phases are required to assure good stress transfer in the composites [51]. In previous years, a lot of research has been carried out to find an alternative to the traditional petrochemical-based matrix because of the shortage of fossil fuel resources and the adverse effect on the environment [52]. Classification of matrices for NFRC is presented in Fig. 7. When natural fibres are used with petroleum-based polymers, then it is called partially biodegradable composites. When they are used with a fully degradable matrix, then it is known as green composites. Load transfer takes place uniformly from a matrix to the fibres [33].
Petroleum-based matrix
A petroleum-based resin is a chemical product obtained from fossil fuels like natural gas and coal [52]. Thermosets and thermoplastics are used as petroleum matrices for NFRC. Epoxy, polyester, phenolic (phenol–formaldehyde), and vinyl ester are utilized as thermoset matrices, whereas PS, polyethylene (PE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and PP are used for thermoplastic matrices [33, 52]. The mechanical properties of different thermoplastic and thermosetting polymers are presented in Table 6.
Thermosets
Thermoset matrices are insoluble and infusible materials that are cured by a catalyst or heat [54]. Thermosets cannot be reshaped and melted by heating [55]. Polymer chains are connected by a three-dimensional covalent bond; this type of matrix has higher thermal stability, higher modulus, higher chemical resistance, and improved creep resistance than thermoplastic resins [52]. At room temperature, they are brittle and show low fracture toughness. The advantages and disadvantages of the thermoset matrix are presented in Table 7.
Thermoplastics
Thermoplastic matrix is based on polymers that can be reshaped and melted by heating (physical change) [60]. Thermoplastic resins have higher viscosity (approximately 500–1000 times) as compared to the uncured thermoset resins in the melted condition. They can be reshaped and reformed without chemical reaction by applying heat, and they are solid at room temperature [52]. These resins have more reform-ability, higher impact resistance, higher processing temperature, and high damage tolerance than thermoset resins [33]. The advantages and disadvantages of the thermoplastic matrix are presented in Table 8.
Bio-based resins
These matrices are polymers that are partially or fully biodegradable and obtained from sustainable resources [33]. Bio-based resins are obtained from plants (e.g., cellulose and starch) or through the polymerization of plant-based oils and sugars (e.g., polyethylene terephthalate, PP, and PLA) [52]. Bio-based resins are of three types: fully biodegradable, e.g., starch, PHA, partially biodegradable, e.g., PLA, cellulose, and non-biodegradable, e.g., bio-polypropylene, bio-polyethylene, and bio-polyethylene terephthalate [33, 52]. The advantages and disadvantages of bio-based resins are presented in Table 9. In 2011, approximately 236 million tons of petroleum-based polymers were produced, whereas the production of bio-based polymers was 3.5 million tons in the same year. The estimated growth rate of bio-based polymers production will reach 12 million tons annually by 2022 [33]. However, this amount is lower than the petroleum-based polymers production, and it is required to increase this amount to lower the adverse effect of petrochemical-based polymers on the environment. Fully biodegradable matrices contain regenerative carbon, which has been drawn from the atmosphere, followed by reverting to the environment as the polymer decays [52]. Bio-based resins like bio-polyethylene, bio-polyethylene terephthalate, and bio-polypropylene, which are chemically similar to petroleum-based resins, can be conventionally reprocessed [33]. Bio-based polymers offer various advantages over petroleum-based polymers: they are completely renewable, energy-efficient during production, safe (non-toxic), and environmentally friendly [62]. However, their production cost is 10–11% higher than petroleum-based resins [63].
Challenges of using natural fibres as reinforcement
Presence of impurities on the fibre surface and water degradation are the biggest challenge associated with NFCs. Although there are various advantages of using natural fibre-based polymeric composites, there are also many negative aspects of using NFCs like moisture absorption, poor mechanical performance, and weak interfacial bonding between fibre and matrix [68,69,70]. The presence of impurities such as hemicellulose, lignin, pectin, and wax in natural fibres deteriorate its mechanical properties because the presence of these impurities on the fibre surface hampers the interfacial adhesion between matrix and reinforcing phase. Advantages and disadvantages of natural fibres in automotive applications are presented in Table 10. For instance, natural fibres are sensitive to moisture and temperature, which restricts their use to interior parts (e.g., door panels, trim in dashboards, seat cushions, parcel shelves, cabin lining, and backrests). Water degradation is the biggest challenge associated with NFCs. They absorb moisture in the external environment due to their hydrophilic nature. The main constituent in the natural fibre is hemicellulose, which absorbs moisture. The fibre shrinks when it dries and swells when it absorbs moisture, which ultimately results in cracks within the composites [71]. Absorbed water by fibres makes a bond with the OH− group of fibre, which weakens the interfacial bonding of matrix and fibre, causing poor mechanical properties of the composite [72]. In natural fibres, the amount of moisture content could be revealed in terms of moisture regain [73]. Thickness swelling of the composite samples is measured as per mathematical Eq. 8, water absorbency by Eq. 9 and moisture regain by Eq. 10 [74].
where Ts represents thickness swelling, Td is the initial thickness swelling of sample before being immersed in water, Tw is the final thickness of swelled sample after being immersed in water.
where Wa represents water absorbency, Wd is the initial weight of sample before being immersed in water, Ww is the weight of sample after being immersed in water.
The moisture regain is defined as the amount of moisture present in a dried material at standard conditions of humidity and temperature compared to the weight of dried material. The value of moisture regain must be known to evaluate the moisture regain or moisture absorption of natural fibres. Hence, the mathematical Eq. (10) to evaluate moisture regain for natural fibres can be given as
or
where MC represents the percentage of moisture content, MR is moisture regain; A is the mass of water, and B is the dry mass. The moisture absorption behaviour of NFCs limits their use for exterior parts of automotive. Several chemical treatment techniques are used to reduce the water absorption content and impurities present on the natural fibre surface and to enhance their mechanical properties. It was reported that lower moisture content in fibres results in higher mechanical properties of natural fibre-based composites [28, 75,76,77]. In the next section, surface treatment methods are reviewed.
Surface treatment of natural Fibre
The main drawbacks of using natural fibres as reinforcement in composites include high moisture absorption by the fibres and poor adhesion at the matrix and fibre interface. The presence of non-cellulosic compounds such as hemicellulose, lignin, pectin, wax, etc., in natural fibres deteriorate its mechanical properties because the presence of these non-cellulosic compounds on the fibre surface hampers the interfacial adhesion between matrix and reinforcing phase. Therefore, modifications of natural fibres surface properties are necessary to improve their bonding with various matrices. There are two methods by which the surface of natural fibres can be modified to enhance the adhesion at the matrix and fibre interface.
-
1.
Physical method
-
2.
Chemical method
Physical treatment method
The surface conditions of natural fibres are changed by physical treatment methods without influencing their chemical composition. Physical treatments involve laser treatment, argon treatment, heat and plasma treatment [80]. The advantages of using physical treatments over chemical treatment methods are improved mechanical, thermal, and physical properties of surface-modified natural fibres. Nowadays, the scientific community gives more preference to chemical treatment methods over physical treatment methods because physical treatment methods are expensive than chemical treatment methods [81].
Chemical treatment methods
The main problem with NFRC arises from the hydrophilic nature of the fibre and the hydrophobic nature of the matrix. The incompatibility between natural fibre and polymer matrix results in poor interfacial bonding. The hydrophilicity of reinforcing natural fibres can be reduced by giving chemical treatments, which improves interfacial adhesion with the matrix phase [82, 83]. Much research has been conducted to enhance the interfacial adhesion between the matrix and reinforcing phase through various chemical treatments. Various chemical treatment methods used in order to reduce the hydrophilic nature of the fibre and their effects on composite properties are presented as follows.
-
(i)
Alkaline treatment
-
(ii)
Silane treatment
-
(iii)
Acetylation
-
(iv)
Maleated coupling
-
(v)
Benzoylation treatment
-
(vi)
Enzyme treatment
Alkaline treatment
In the alkaline treatment method, natural fibres are treated with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution so as to remove non-cellulosic compounds such as lignin, pectin, hemicellulose, wax, and oils which are covering the outer surface of the fibre cell wall and hence modify its cellulosic molecular structure when used to reinforce with thermosets and thermoplastics. Alkaline reaction on fibre is given in Eq. 11 [84]. This treatment can be done in four different ways, such as (a) taking different concentrations of NaOH solution for a different period of time [85], (b) keeping constant NaOH solution concentration for a different period of time [86,87,88], (c) using constant NaOH solution concentration for a constant time period [89,90,91], (d) using different NaOH solution concentration for a constant time period [92]. The first and second methods are the most commonly used treatments to evaluate the most favourable states for natural fibre modification. By using different NaOH solution concentrations for a constant time period, the natural fibres need to be treated with NaOH solution (2%-6% by wt./ by vol.), maintaining temperature around 24 °C for a constant period of time that permits to eradicate lignin, hemicellulose, and wax. After this chemical treated process, the fibres are dried, neutralized, and cleaned [92, 93]. By using constant NaOH solution concentration for different time periods, the fibres are treated with NaOH solution (5% by wt./ by vol.) by varying the time (i.e., 16, 31, 45, 65, 75, and 95 min.) [86, 87, 94]. After this chemical process, the treated fibres are cleaned with deionized water by incorporating a few drops of 0.2 N hydrochloric acid to separate the surplus impurities [85, 88, 95]. Table 11 summarizes the effect of alkaline treatment on the thermal and mechanical performance of composites.
Silane treatment
The hydrophilic nature of the fibre is associated with the surface energy of fibres. Some investigations reported the methods to decrease the hydrophilic nature of fibre. Silane acts as a coupling agent, a multifunctional molecule used to modify the surface of fibre [100,101,102,103]. The aminopropyl triethoxy silane and vinyltrimethoxysilane are the commonly used silanes that may contribute hydrophilic properties to the interface [104,105,106]. In this treatment, the ethanol–water mixture is mixed with some amount of vinyltrimethoxysilane or aminopropyl triethoxy silanes in the ratio (2:3). Keeping the pH value of this solution at 4, acetic acid is added, followed by keeping this solution for 1 h. The fibres or fabric were immersed in the above solution for 3 h then the treated fibres or fabric was dried for 8 h at 65 °C [107,108,109]. Natural fibres possess micro-pores or voids on their surface. Silane coupling agents act as a surface coating. This coupling agent penetrates into the voids, or micropores and hence interlocked coatings are developed on the fibre surface. It was reported that silane-treated NFRC exhibit superior tensile properties than the alkaline-treated NFRC [110]. Silane reactions on fibre are given in Eqs. 12 and 13 [84]. The researcher investigated the silane effect (1% oligomeric siloxane with 97% alcohol solution for 2 h) and alkali (5% NaOH for 2 h) treatments on flexural strength of jute polyester and jute epoxy composites. Results showed that for jute polyester composites with silane treatment, strength and modulus properties were enhanced by 20% and 8%, respectively, as compared to the alkaline treatment alone. It was also reported that tensile strength and modulus were increased by 12% and 7% for the similar treatments compared to the alkali treatment alone [111]. The surface of the kenaf fibre and its interfacial adhesion with the PS matrix was modified by using a silane coupling agent. The condensation reaction between alkoxysilane and hydroxyl network of kenaf cellulose improved interfacial adhesion between fibre and matrix phase. Due to the kenaf fibre modification, kenaf/PS-based composites exhibited lower tan δ and higher storage modulus than those with untreated fibre [112]. Similarly, the coir fibres and oil palm empty bunch of fruits were treated with silane coupling agents by Ismail et al. [113, 114]. It was reported that the tensile strength, modulus, fatigue life, hardness and tear strength of coir fibre and oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) reinforced natural rubber and polyester composites were enhanced. Two types of flax fibres (flax pulp and natural flax) were used as a reinforcing phase with PP matrix to fabricate flax/PP composites. The flax fibres were treated with maleic anhydride-polypropylene copolymer (MAPP) and maleic anhydride (MA). These treatments reduced the polar component of the surface energy of the flax fibre. It was observed that MAPP-treated Flax/PP-based composites exhibited the highest mechanical properties, while the MA-treated fibres obtained similar results to those of the untreated ones [115]. Table 12 summarizes the effect of silane chemical treatment on the mechanical performance of NFRC.
Acetylation
Acetylation is another chemical method of fibre treatment that replaces the hydroxyl (OH−) group of natural fibre with the acetyl group and makes them more hydrophobic. The main motive of this treatment is to coat the OH− groups of natural fibres and make them hydrophobic in nature. As a result, the hydrophilicity of the fibre was reduced by enhancing the dimensional stability of the NFRC [119]. Moreover, this chemical treatment makes the fibre surface rough with fewer voids that give better interfacial adhesion with the matrix [96, 120]. In this treatment, the cellulose structure of fibre is grafted with and without a catalyst by an acetyl group. In general, acetic anhydride and acetic acid do not react adequately with the fibres. Initially, fibres are immersed in acetic anhydride and consequently acetic acid for 1–4 h with higher temperature. Acetylation reactions on fibre with and without catalyst are given in Eqs. 14 and 15 [121]. Acetylation on alkaline pre-treated (5% and 10% NaOH concentration solution for 2 h at 280 °C) sisal fibre was performed, which reported improvement in fibre-matrix interfacial bonding of the composites [122]. Acetylation treatment with unlike concentration of catalyst on flax fibre was studied. Damage in the fibres was observed when more than 0.054% catalyst was used during acetylation. The hydrophilicity of the flax fibre was decreased by using a higher degree of acetylation. It was also noted that the flexural and tensile properties of flax fibre-reinforced polymeric composites were enhanced by using an 18% degree of acetylation [80]. Seena et al. [123] studied the acetylation-treated abaca fibre-reinforced PF composites and the results revealed an improvement in the tensile strength, modulus, and impact strength as compared to untreated abaca fibre-reinforced composites. In another study, acetylation treatment was applied to remove non-crystalline constituents of the banana fibres, and improved adhesion between the fibre and matrix interphase was observed. Moreover, the tensile properties of the composite were enhanced, but the tensile property of the fibre itself was not significantly improved [25]. Zafeiropoulos et al. [124] investigated the influence of acetylation at the interface of flax fibre/PP-based composites and reported improved surface topography and stress transfer from matrix to fibres in the composite. In another study, the weight of the natural fibres (up to about 16.6%) was increased due to acetylation treatment, which completely changed the bulk properties of the natural fibre itself [125]. Table 13 summarizes the influence of the acetylation treatment method on the mechanical performance of NFRC.
Maleated coupling
The maleated coupling method is widely used to make natural fibres hydrophobic in nature. MA is used to modify the surface of fibre so as to achieve better interfacial adhesion in between fibre and matrix phase, which results in better mechanical properties of composites. In this process, MA removes the OH− groups from the amorphous region of the cellulose network to make it compatible with the polymeric resin. This makes the fibre surface coated, by reducing its hydrophilicity. Therefore, carbon–carbon covalent bond formation takes place between the anhydride groups of the maleic agent and OH− groups of fibre by maleated coupling agent. This covalent bond makes a bridge interface, which improves bonding at the interface of fibre and polymeric matrix [128]. For instance, the polypropylene chain makes the maleic anhydride coupler to be cohesive by the treatment of cellulose structural fibres with hot MAPP copolymers that makes a covalent bond at the interface. The reaction of MAPP and the cellulosic structure of fibre (shown in Fig. 8) can be explained by esterification of cellulose structure of fibre and activation energy of the copolymer at 180 °C. This fibre surface modification method improves wettability and bonding between the fibre and polymeric matrix at the interface [129]. Mohanty et al. [130] used 0.5% MAPP as a coupling agent impregnated in toluene for 5 min with jute fibre (6 mm fibre length with 30% fibre loading) reinforced in PP matrix. It was reported that the treated jute/PP composite revealed 72.2% higher flexural modulus as compared to the untreated fibre-reinforced composites. In addition, the hydrophilic tendency of the treated fibre was also reduced. In another study, Mishra et al. [131] studied that maleated coupling treatment reduced hydrophilic content to a large extent in abaca, sisal, and hemp fibre-reinforced composites. Results showed higher hardness, young’s modulus, flexural modulus, and impact strength of NFRC as compared to untreated fibre composites. Yang et al. [132] studied the effects of MAPP coupling agent on rice-husk/PP composites. It was reported that the increment in filler loading rate decreased the tensile strength of the composite, but by incorporating MAPP coupling agent, the tensile strength of the composite was improved and izod impact strength of both notched and unnotched specimens remained almost the same. In addition, the positive effect of a coupling agent on bonding between fibre and matrix across interfaces was revealed by the morphological study. The effects of 1% MAPP coupling agent on sisal fibre-PP composites were evaluated by Mohanty et al. [133]. It was reported that tensile, impact and flexural properties were enhanced by 50%, 58% and 30%, respectively. Keener et al. [128] suggested that 3% was the optimum amount for using maleated coupling agents on flax and jute fibres. Table 14 summarizes the effect of maleated treatment on mechanical performance of NFRC.
Benzoylation treatment
Benzoylation process makes use of benzoyl chloride solution to lower the moisture absorption in the fibre cell wall, resulting in better adhesion at the fibre and matrix interface, increased composite strength and enhanced thermal stability of the natural fibre [96, 138]. During this treatment, alkaline pre-treated fibres are used. Benzoyl is responsible for extracting materials such as lignin, hemicellulose, waxes and oil covering materials from plant cellulosic structure, and a large number of OH− groups are exposed on the natural fibre surface. During this process, the benzoyl group replaced the OH− group of the natural fibre and coupled with the cellulosic structure of the fibre (shown in Eq. 16) [139]. This resulted in decreased hydrophilic tendency of the treated fibre and improved interfacial bonding with the hydrophobic matrix [96]. Joseph et al. [140] used benzoyl chloride to decrease hydrophilicity of alkali pre-treated sisal fibre, and results revealed that the thermal stability of treated fibre composites was improved as compared to the untreated fibre-reinforced composites. Wang et al. [141] investigated similar treatment on flax/PP composites, and results revealed that the tensile strength of the treated flax fibre-reinforced composites was enhanced by 6%. In addition, the positive effect of a benzoylation treatment on interfacial bonding between matrix and fibre was revealed by the morphological study.
Enzyme treatment
Enzyme treatment is widely used to make natural fibre hydrophobic in nature. Enzyme treatment is used to extract materials such as lignin, waxes and oil covering materials from plant cellulose structure by the action of enzymes. White rot enzyme produces oxidase enzymes that react with wax and lignin parts of the natural fibre. This results in removal of the non-cellulosic constituents from fibre. It also enhances hemicellulose solubility and thus makes the fibre hydrophobic in nature. Furthermore, enzymes produce hyphae, which creates micropores on the surface of fibre and makes a rough interface for better adhesion between the fibre and matrix across the interface [142, 143]. In this treatment process, the fibres are degummed while improving the fineness, homogeneity, softness and cleanliness. This treatment is completely environment friendly and efficient. The process is rapid but exquisite over other chemical treatment processes since it should be performed at 100 °C below atmospheric pressure with a pH of 5–9, while the addition of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) to fungi mixtures can enhance the effectiveness of this process [144]. Bledzki et al. [145] studied the effect of enzyme treatment on abaca/PP composites using fungamix and reported 46% increment in tensile strength. Furthermore, the tensile strength was enhanced up to 41% using MAPP coupling agent at the same conditions. Pickering et al. [142] studied the effect of enzyme treatment on hemp/PP composites and reported 22% increment in composite strength as compared to untreated fibre. In addition, enzyme-treated hemp/PP composite showed 33% improvement in composite strength over alkali-treated fibres. When fungi treatment was given with a pre-treatment using ethylene diamine tetramethylene phosphoric acid, more amount of lignin, wax, hemicellulose, and other non-cellulosic components were separated from hemp fibre [134, 146]. In addition, 270% increment in the porosity of the hemp fibres with deterioration in mechanical properties was observed [147].
Biodegradation mechanisms in NFCs
In NFCs, the polymer contains a carbon or hetero-chain backbone. Chemical hydrolysis, or enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis, is the method of degradation for hetero-chain backbone polymers [148]. The hydrolytic enzymes generated by physico-chemical characteristics of the polymer and microorganisms are the major factors in hydrolytic biodegradation. Polymer biodegradation process can occur up to a month using this method [149]. The hydrolytic biodegradation process of polymers can be restrained by using chemicals or additives in order to use for several practical applications. Some natural biopolymers such as proteins and polysaccharides, plant-derived polymers like polybutylene succinate (PBS), and PLA and microbially derived polymers such as poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) undergoes hydrolytic biodegradation [148]. Chemical bonding, thickness, co-polymer type, and morphology may affect the hydrolytic degradation rate under enzyme-mediated or non-enzyme-mediated conditions. When comparing the biodegradation of carbon chain and hetero-chain polymers, the carbon-chain backbone polymer takes longer time to decompose [148]. Chemical oxidation is the mechanism through which carbon backbone polymers degrade. Some natural biopolymers such as lignin, and natural rubber undergoes oxidative biodegradation. The oxidative biodegradation process of polymers may take several years, which is significantly longer than hydrolytic biodegradation.
Processing methods
The processing methods used for fabricating NFRC are mostly determined by the polymer matrix employed. Moisture, fibre type, fibre volume fraction, and composite temperature are the primary factors that influence the processing of NFCs. The natural fibre must be free of moisture and the required surface treatment of fibre must be performed if fibre contains moisture [33]. Processing methods such as compression moulding, extrusion moulding, injection moulding are suitable for thermoplastic matrices. Processing methods such as hand lay-up, resin transfer moulding, vacuum-assisted resin transfer moulding are suitable for thermoset matrices.
Processing methods for thermoplastic based composites
Injection moulding
Injection moulding is the most prevalent method for mass-producing composites. This technique begins with the polymers being placed in the hopper as pellets or granules and being heated until molten. The molten ingredients are then injected into and held in a chamber produced by a split die mould. Before opening the mould, the molten material is chilled down to solidify [150].
Compression moulding
Since the 1990s, compression moulding has been employed to make thermoplastic composites as the demand for lightweight, high-performance materials has grown [33]. Composite is made by mixing the reinforcement and matrix in the metallic mould of required shape and size [151]. The compression mould is made up of two parts: a stationary bottom plate and a moveable upper plate. Moulds are available in different shape and size, or it may also fabricate as per the intricacy of the profile which needs to be developed. After putting the sample in the mould, mould is placed between the two heating platen, which are set to the required temperature and pressure as per the matrix materials used during the process [152]. The curing procedure is carried out at ambient temperature, and the composite is taken out of the mould [33]. Compression moulding is used to make vehicle body panels and structures that are thin, lightweight, and strong.
Extrusion
Extrusion is a high-speed processing method that is commonly used to make thermoplastic polymer composites [153]. This processing method is chosen because of the high strength and stiffness of the composite, as well as the ease with which the composites may be formed [33]. During this process, the polymer material in the form of granules or pellets are fed into a hopper of an extruder. A single screw or twin-screw extruder can be used. The melt flows into the extruder’s barrel and is forced out via a die to form the required shape [151, 154, 155]. Extrusion is a fully automated, continuous fabrication technique. Delivery rate, Pressure, and temperature are all critical parameters. Any air trapped between the grains is extruded out [151].
Processing methods for thermoset based composites
Hand lay-up
Hand lay-up is the common, easiest, and least expensive method of manufacturing composites [156]. In this method, a release agent is first applied to an open mould as an anti-adhesive agent, and then the fibres are placed in the mould. Resin is poured and brushed onto the fibres with a roller or brush. Layer upon layer of lay-up is building until the desired thickness is achieved. Squeegees or rollers are used to remove trapped air in the laminate. The laminates are then allowed to cure in atmospheric conditions [157].
Resin transfer moulding
In resin transfer moulding (RTM) method, instead of pouring the polymer into an open mould, the resin is preheated and loaded into the holding chamber [158]. This method is suitable for fabricating of large components in medium-volume production. The process diagram of RTM method is shown in Fig. 9 [159]. The resin is injected to impregnate the preform after the textile fabric layers are placed in the solid mould. Vacuum is frequently utilized to prevent air bubbles and help in the drawing of resin into the cavity [160].
Vacuum assisted resin transfer moulding (VARTM)
VARTM method is modified version of RTM method in which top mould is replaced with vacuum bagging [161]. In this process, resin flow is assisted with vacuum to maintain the atmospheric pressure for curing of the specimen. Basic accessories used in VARTM method includes peel ply, mesh, spiral, vacuum bag and sealant tape. In this process, preform is first placed on bottom mould of required shape and size, then the flexible tool face is forced down over the composite object. Mesh which is placed above the peel ply controls and limits the flow of resin. Spiral tube is used to guide the flow of resin through the fibre preform. The liquid resin is pumped into the mould at a moderate pressure, suturing the fibres. A vacuum can be applied to the mould to reduce air pockets and improve the composites quality [162]. Figure 10 illustrates a typical setup used for VARTM method.
Morphology
Optical microscope and SEM are the major approaches to study the morphology of composites. SEM gives detailed information on the topography and composition of composites at the micro-scale through high magnification level whereas optical microscopy is appropriate for general inspection [163]. The morphology of NFCs has been studied extensively. This review article includes some of these studies. The morphological study of unidirectional bamboo/epoxy composites fabricated by compression moulding method with a combination of heat and pressure was studied through optical microscopy by Hebel et al. [164]. Optical micrographs of the fractured surface of composite fabricated at 100 °C and pressures of 15, 20, and 25 MPa are shown in Fig. 11a-c [164]. The results revealed that the composites fabricated at a pressure of 20 MPa have smooth surface, homogenously covered by matrix and higher tensile strength than 15 and 25 MPa. Due to its viscosity, the polymer network forms a thin layer at this pressure that effectively interacts with the fibre surface and penetrates into the fibre. Furthermore, the reduction in the homogenous coverage and wettability of fibres occurs by lowering the pressure to 15 MPa. The epoxy resin formed crystalline beads larger at 25 MPa than at 15 MPa, and infiltration was hindered by propagating carbonization of the fibres. The morphology of chopped kneaf/PLA composites fabricated by melt mixing method using SEM was studied by Pan et al. [163]. SEM micrographs of neat PLA and a composite of 30 wt.% kenaf fibre are shown in Fig. 12 [163]. Because of the brittleness of the resin, the fractured surface of neat PLA was uneven and rough. The interfacial adhesion between the fibre and matrix (shown by “A”) was good, but many fibres were damaged during tensile testing as shown in Fig. 12. Some fibres in the fabricated composite (shown by “B” in Fig. 12) fractured in the matrix during tensile deformation, showing that the interfacial adhesion between the fibre and matrix further improved. Because of the rough surface of the kenaf fibre and high viscosity of PLA, agglomeration of kenaf fibres (shown by “C”) and the presence of tiny voids (shown by “D”) are also visible in Fig. 12. Pothan et al. [165] investigated the effect of the different fibre percentage on the morphology of chopped banana/polyester composite fabricated by compression moulding method through SEM. SEM micrographs of composites with different fibre content (10, 20, and 40 wt.%) are shown in Fig. 13a-c. The results revealed that fibre-matrix bonding was good in the composite with 40 wt.% fibre content, but fibre-matrix debonding was clearly visible in the composites with 10wt.% and 20wt.% fibre content. In addition, there was no voids and strong interfacial bonding between fibre and matrix in composite specimen (40 wt.% fibre content) was observed. However, when the fibre content was reduced, the accumulation efficiency of fibres was not high, which makes the interface area prone to bonding failure.
Simulation and modelling of bio-composites used for automotive
Analytical models
Due to different parameters, such as the type of resin and fibre used, the microstructure and composition of fibre, the fabricating method and the expected application, the modelling of the mechanical properties of bio-composites is considered a very complicated process [166]. The mechanical properties of bio-composites with chopped fibres have been predicated using six analytical models: rule of mixture, Hirsch model, Bowyer Bader model, series and parallel, Halpin–Tsai model, and shear model [167]. Micro-defects in the matrix and the fibre/matrix interface are not taken into account in these models. The prediction of the tensile strength and Young’s modulus of unidirectional jute/epoxy composite fabricated by resin infusion moulding method using rule of mixture model was investigated by Virk et al. [168]. The author reported that measuring the cross-sectional area of fibres by linear measurement of fibre diameter and assuming a circular cross section of fibre would results in an overestimation of cross-sectional area and diminishing the mechanical properties of jute fibre was observed. The author suggested a fibre area correction factor (FACF) for predicting the composites tensile strength and Young’s modulus accurately. Kalaprasad et al. [169] compared Hirsch, Halpin–Tsai, series and parallel, Bowyer–Bader, and shear lag models to predict tensile properties of chopped sisal/low-density polyethylene composites fabricated by injection moulding method. The author reported that except for the series and parallel model, all models exhibited good accord with experimental longitudinally chopped composite Young’s modulus and tensile strength. In addition, Bowyer–Bader and Hirsch models were also shown to be in good accord with experimental results of chopped composites. Migneault et al. [170] used the Halpin–Tsai equation and the shear lag model to predict the Young’s modulus of chopped pulp/high-density polyethylene composites fabricated by injection moulding method, and found that the predictions with an orientation factor in the modelling were in good accord with the experimental results. The prediction of the tensile strength of hemp/polypropylene composite fabricated by injection and extrusion moulding method using Bowyer–Bader model was investigated by Beckermann and Pickering et al. [171]. The author reported that in predicting the mechanical properties of bio-composites, fibre aspect ratio (AR) and orientation are two key parameters to be considered. Facca et al. [172] used the Halpin–Tsai equation, rule of mixture, and the shear lag model to predict the Young’s modulus of chopped hemp/HDPE composites fabricated by compression moulding method, and found that Halpin–Tsai model predicted Young’s modulus more accurately than other models because the efficiency factor (EF) is generally derived from experimentally measurements of the material to be modelled in the Halpin–Tsai equation. Munde and Ingle et al. [173] compared Hirsch model, Bowyer–Bader, and Halpin–Tsai equation to predict Young’s modulus and tensile strength of chopped coir/polypropylene composites fabricated by compression moulding method. The author reported that the Hirsch model predicted Young’s modulus and tensile strength more accurately than other models.
Simulation by finite element method (FEM)
The finite element analysis has been used to simulate the properties of bio-composites, because it can constructively investigate the influence of various parameters, such as the type of reinforcement, the fibre aspect ratio, volume fraction of fibre, and the fibre orientation on the performance of bio-composites [174]. Representative volume element (RVE) has been considered to predict the mechanical performance of composite materials as the most effective homogenization-based multi-scale approach for mechanical characterization of composites. To simulate bio-composites with chopped fibres, two RVE methods were used: orientation averaging and direct RVE. A single fibre is embedded in the matrix (as a unit cell) in the orientation averaging method, whereas the matrix is surrounded by number of fibres in the direct RVE approach. The mechanical properties of bio-composites with chopped fibres have been predicted using FEM approach in a few research. The prediction of the Young’s modulus of flax/polypropylene composite fabricated by extrusion moulding method (shown in Fig. 14) using RVE orientation averaging approach was investigated by Modniks and Andersons et al. [175]. They used five loading nodes to obtain the composite’s elastic constants, assuming that the unit cell is transversely isotropic. The results showed that the modelling approach were in a good accord with experimental results of chopped composites. Sliseris et al. [176] simulated the tensile properties of chopped flax/polypropylene composites with 3D RVE approach by considering the effect of voids, bundles, and fibre aspect ratio. PP matrix and flax fibre were modelled as nonlinear plastic material and linear isotropic elastic material, respectively. To analyse the effect of fibre defect in the simulation, they modelled (shown in Fig. 15) the interface between the fibres and the fibres using continuum damage mechanics approach. They reported that the plastic deformation of the composite material starts at the end of the fibre and around the fibre defect, which matched the experimental results. Kern et al. [174] simulated the tensile properties of chopped wheat/PP composites using 3D RVE approach (shown in Fig. 16) by considering the effect of micro-cellular voids. They reported that the void-filled composite had shorter fracture path than the void-free composite. Their predictions matched the experimental results. Gopalan et al. [177] investigated the dynamic behaviour of woven Flax/epoxy composite plates experimentally and numerically. It was reported that the structural behaviour of the fabricated composite showed a compromising one to some of the synthetic composite which were used in various dynamic load bearing structural applications. Furthermore, the numerical and experimental results were found to be in good agreement.
Potential of natural fibres for automotive
One of the largest consumers of natural fibre-based polymeric composite is the automotive industry [178]. Natural fibre-based composites have superior specific mechanical properties, durable, sustainable, and environmentally friendly, which makes them captivate to the automotive industry. Initially, NFRC were used for interior components of a car due to their low weight [179]. The comparatively low cost of natural fibres (such as hemp, coir, sisal and jute) as compared to glass fibre, which makes them fascinate to the automotive industry [180]. The first car was made of hemp fibre-based composite by Henry Ford in 1940. Other manufacturers, Daimler-Benz (1994), Mercedes (1996), used composites in their cars, but the application of NFRC really started to play a dominant role in the automotive sector in 1998, when morassi fabricated seats made of coir fibre with latex for trucks [181]. Today, most car manufacturers, including Mercedes, Volkswagen, Daimler-Chrysler, Audi Group, Ford, BMW, Nissan, Opel, Toyota, and Mitsubishi, use natural fibre-based composites in several applications, as presented in Table 15. In 1994, Mercedes Benz used jute fibre-reinforced polymeric composites for the interior door panel of their E-Class variant [182, 183]. Flax, sisal/epoxy fibre mat reinforced composites were used to fabricate the door and reported 20% weight reduction. In 1999, Mercedes Benz used 65% blend of hemp, flax, and sisal fibre and 35% polyurethane (PU) for the inner door panel of their S-Class variant [184]. In 2000, flax/polyester-based composites were used in the engine encapsulations by Mercedes in their various bus brands; EvoBus, Trivago, Setra and Top-class and reported 5% weight reduction in the Setra series engine with the use of natural fibre-reinforced polymeric composites [185]. In 2003, Toyota used kenaf fibres reinforced in the PLA matrix to go green in their RAUM model spare tyre cover [186]. Mazda used kenaf/PP composites in their door trims, door scuff plates and other interior parts. Lexus CT200h models used PP/PLA composites in the door scuff plates, side trims, toolbox area, package trays, and floor finishing plates [187]. NFRC used primarily for interior parts such as cabin linings, door panels, dashboards, parcel shelves, backrests and seat cushions [79, 153]. Thus far, NFRC have found limited applications in exterior parts of the car due to their high hydrophilic behaviour. For instance, abaca fibre-reinforced composites were used underfloor panelling by the Mercedes A-class model. Flax fibres were also used in other exterior parts by Travego. Germany based car manufacturers like Audi, BMW, Volkswagen, Porsche and Mercedes are trying to make each component of their cars either biodegradable or recyclable [188]. AL Rahman et al. [189] studied pure micro-porous materials, used coir fibre and date palm fibres for sound insulation purposes, and results showed good acoustics properties at a low frequency, which showed a great potential to replace conventional materials counterpart. In 1980, bio-composites were used for the first time to fabricate automotive door panels [180]. Daimler A class used NFRC to fabricate boot lid, roof and bonnet of Bio Concept car [73]. The average usage of NFRC per vehicle is 11–13.2 kg in the automotive industry in Brazil. The natural fibre reinforcement is distributed in a vehicle, such as rear door liners (0.9–1.6 kg), front door liners (1.3–1.7 kg), boot liners (1.7–2.7 kg), sunroof interior shields (0.6 kg), headrests (2.3 kg) and parcel shelves (2.1 kg) [190]. In Europe, various automotive industries are using natural fibres to fabricate door panels in their C Segment cars, and 20% weight reduction was observed by the use of wood fibre in various models of sedans like Mercedes [191]. Flax, wood, hemp, kenaf, jute, coir and sisal fibres are being used nowadays as reinforcement for elastomers, thermosets and thermoplastics for the fabrication of several automotive components, such as pillars, door panels, instrument panels, seat panels and seat holsteries [73]. It was reported that 21% cost reduction and 32% weight reduction occurred by incorporating natural fibres into various components of the vehicle in the automotive industries. If the mass of the vehicle will be reduced, then it will consume less fuel and CO2 emission will also be reduced. The European Union Commission set ‘European Guidelines 2000/53/RG’ for the automotive industries to set goals for automotive recyclability. Many countries, like Japan and the United States of America, are giving more emphasis on automotive recyclability [192]. In the automotive sector, NFRC are being used for dashboards and door panels. Wood-based composites are mainly used for spare wheels, trims for trunks, rear shelves, and interior trims for decklid. Different parts of various models of Mercedes-Benz (shown in Fig. 17) fabricated using different natural fibres (sisal, hemp, wool, flax, and others) [193]. In 2012, the total volume of natural fibres and wood used in the fabrication of composites for lorries and passenger vehicles in Europe was 80,000 t as shown in Fig. 18. Recycled waste cotton fibre-based composites were mostly used for cabins of the cars [194].
Recent advancements in textile fibre-reinforced composites (TFRC)
Natural-synthetic fibres reinforced hybrid composites for automotive structural components
In hybrid composites, one type of reinforcement is integrated with a mixture of two different matrices [195], or more than one reinforcing material are mixed in a single matrix phase [196], or both cases are combined together. The mechanical properties of hybrid composites depend on the AR (L/D) of fibres, the properties of discrete fibre, length of the discrete fibre, fibre-matrix interfacial bonding, the proportion of intermingling of fibres, failure strain of fibres, fibres arrangement, and also on the orientation of fibres [197]. In this section, application of hybrid composites in automotive structural parts (i.e., bumper beam, anti-roll bar and brake pads) is being discussed. The bumper beam is a structural part as it absorbs kinetic energy during a high impact crash and provides resistance to buckling in a low impact crash. In one study, mechanical properties of glass and jute fibres reinforced in polypropylene matrix were compared for the automotive car bumper beam by Olorunnishola et al. [198]. Hand lay-up technique was used to fabricate hybrid composites by laying the fibres on the bumper mould and the commercial-grade PP sprayed on it. The samples were cured for 20–24 h, and the surface was finished by grinding wheel operation. Three types of samples were prepared with 40 wt.% of jute fibre, 40 wt.% of glass fibre and 30 wt.% of jute fibre blended with 10 wt.% of glass fibre to make hybrid composites [198]. To enhance the adhesion across the interface of fibre and matrix, a maleated polypropylene coupling agent was used. The results revealed that hybrid composites showed the superior impact and hardness properties as compared to the non-hybridized composites and can efficiently substitute conventional materials used for bumper beams. In another study, thermomechanical properties of glass and flax fibres reinforced in methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) matrix were investigated by Hasan et al. [199]. The results revealed that the incorporation of glass fibre in composites showed satisfactory mechanical performance (tensile strength, tensile modulus, flexural strength, and flexural modulus). Furthermore, the thermal stability of glass/flax hybrid composites was also improved by the addition of glass fibre. However, with the addition of glass fibre in composites, the water absorption and moisture content began to fall. Figure 19 shows the schematic diagram of a typical structural bumper.
In another study, a kenaf/glass-based hybrid composite was fabricated for automotive structural car bumper beams with sheet moulding compound (SMC) to improve the desired mechanical properties. A specimen was tested and compared with automotive structural car bumper beam material known as glass mat thermoplastic (GMT). The result revealed that tensile strength, Young’s modulus, flexural strength, and modulus were almost similar to GMT; however, impact strength was low. The researcher suggested optimization of design parameters to enhance the impact properties [201]. To design automotive structural components, replacement of iron and steel with natural fibre-reinforced hybrid composites was done because of high power consumption in fabricating metal structural components that influence the environment [202]. Hence, the researchers focused on natural fibre selection for hybrid composite materials to fabricate an automotive structural anti-roll bar (ARB) in order to evaluate the suitable natural fibre for hybrid composites that could satisfy both environmental and the customer requirements. This study was conducted using a fusion of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and environmental quality function deployment (EQFD). SolidWorks sustainability tool was used for life cycle assessment (LCA) of the developed hybrid composites to satisfy the expected environmental requirements. The results revealed that sugar palm fibre with 21.51% of the total score was the best fibre to fulfil the design requirements, followed by kenaf fibre, which obtained 20.19%. The selected sugar palm fibre reduced the production cost, making the sustainable rate of selected natural fibres comparable to the synthetic fibres used for the automotive structural ARB as shown in Fig. 20. Furthermore, the LCA was done for both the fibres and results revealed that sugar palm fibre exhibited 10% less effect on the environment because of its lower CO2 footprints and lower energy consumption. Hence, sugar palm fibres were chosen as the prime material used in the hybrid fibre-reinforced polymeric composite for the automotive structural ARB [203].
Friction brake pads are safety–critical components of disc brakes used in the automotive. It is also known as friction linings which is used to stop or decelerate the vehicle by transforming the kinetic energy of the running vehicle into thermal energy through friction. Brake pad absorbs the maximum amount of heat; remaining heat is dissipated into the surrounding. Figure 21 shows the schematic arrangement of a typical brake pad. The friction material of brake pad consists of reinforcement in the form of fibres, friction modifier, binders, and fillers. Asbestos fibres as a reinforcement incorporated in the polymeric matrix have been a supreme choice among brake pad manufacturers because of its excellent mechanical and thermal properties. However, due to stringent environmental concerns and its carcinogenic nature, the scientific community is trying to find suitable alternate materials to replace asbestos. In one study, sisal, nettle and Grewia optiva fibres in mat form reinforced PLA matrix and their tribological properties were evaluated. Hot compression moulding technique was used to fabricate hybrid composites. The results revealed that wear properties were enhanced substantially because of the inclusion of hybrid fibres [205]. Another study, the effect of banana fibres on tribological and mechanical properties of the friction brake pad was investigated by Zhen-Yu et al. [206]. The results revealed that as fibre percentage increased, wear rate, compressibility and water absorption were increased. However, the hardness of the composite decreased as the fibre percentage increased. Furthermore, higher frictional and brake pad performance was observed when the banana fibre content used was less than 10 wt.% [206]. Choosri et al. [207] investigated the compressive, hardness, wear and friction properties at room temperature and high temperature (100 °C-150°C) of S-glass/phenolic composites containing the bagasse ash and industrial waste fly ash as secondary abrasive (0–12 wt.%) for replacing primary abrasives (alumina and silica). Composite was fabricated by a compression moulding technique. The results revealed that composite with 4 wt.% natural abrasives showed an optimum performance and a great potential to replace primary abrasives (alumina and silica) counterparts. Furthermore, compressive strength of bagasse based phenolic composites was enhanced as compared to the natural fly ash based phenolic composites for a given load. In addition, lower wear resistance and higher coefficient of friction of phenolic based composites was observed at 100 °C and 150 °C. In another study, jute fibres combined with pulverized hazelnut shells as biodegradable natural fillers used for non-asbestos organic friction brake pad composites was studied. Two combinations of samples, jute fibres combined with graphite solid lubricant and jute fibres combined with hazelnut shells were prepared. According to SAE J661 standard using CHASE tester, friction and wear properties of the prepared composites were evaluated. The results revealed that jute-graphite based composites exhibited fade phenomenon if the temperature increased above 300 °C. At the same time, jute-hazelnut shell-based composites exhibited better resistance to fade phenomenon even if the temperature exceeded 300 °C. Furthermore, for 14 vol.% natural and biodegradable components, a combination of jute fibres (5.6 vol.%) with pulverized hazelnut shells (8.4 vol.%) possessed better frictional performance, whereas for 30 vol.% natural and biodegradable components, a combination of jute fibres (23.6 vol.%) with pulverized hazelnut shells (6.3 vol.%) has shown allowable stability of frictional coefficient [208].
Natural filler reinforced polymer nanocomposites
Nanocomposites are those materials in which nanosized filler particles are incorporated into the matrix, resulting in an improvement in mechanical properties, electrical and thermal conductivity. Generally, nanocomposite materials are a multiphase solid material in which at least one phase has a dimension lower than 100 nm [210]. Nowadays, this technology is growing at a rapid pace in the manufacturing of various automotive components such as sensors, windows, batteries, fuel cells, paints, nano-filters, and tires due to its higher AR (L/D) and larger surface area with fascinating properties. In nanocomposites materials, nanofillers are key components and can be composed of inorganic/organic, inorganic/inorganic, or organic/organic sources. There are various types of bio-based filler materials available in nature, such as ramie, kenaf, jute, coir, hemp rice husk, and bamboo [211]. When the size of fillers is reduced from micrometers to nanometers, various characteristics, such as a larger surface area to volume ratio, excellent mechanical properties (tensile modulus and strength), and flexibility in surface functionalities, tend to appear as compared to any other conformation of material [212]. A wide range of polymeric nanocomposite materials has been developed for several applications by integrating various polymer matrices, nanostructured materials, and nanofabrication techniques. To improve the performance (mechanical strength, optical, thermal, and electrical properties) of PMC, nanomaterials can be incorporated with both the matrix and fibre. The diameter of cellulose nanofibre is less than 0.5 µm and has high stiffness and strength compared to micro-natural fibres. Solution spinning, melt blown, electrospinning, melt spinning, and electrospinning techniques are used to process nanofibres [213]. Similar to surface modification treatments of natural fibres, nanofibres are also given various modification treatments, which result, improvement in mechanical properties, thermal properties, and physico-chemical properties of nanofibres [214]. Recognizing the mechanical and morphological advantages of nanofillers, the scientific community produced nanocomposite materials by using different reinforcing fibres and polymeric matrix by a wide variety of clays, which showed better properties. Reported work on nanocomposite materials as recited in Table 16. Nanocomposite materials showed improvement in electrical, mechanical, and thermal properties over conventional composites. In addition, a notable reduction in flammability of the polymer matrix was observed by using nanoparticles [52, 215].
Textile structural reinforced polymeric 3-D composites
TSRPC are composites reinforced by textile structures committed for load-bearing applications. These TSC must have textile structure (act as a preform for composites), matrix, ceramic, or metal component and must have the potential to withstand primary and secondary load in automotive. The principal objective of TSC envisions the utilization of textile fibre-based structures in composite fabrication to achieve lightweight composites, load-bearing composites, and advanced composites. And the prime advantage of textile structural reinforced polymeric 3D composites is to take advantages of textile structure (preform) inclusion to textile-based materials in structural composites to achieve high strength/weight ratio, structural anisotropy, high impact resistance, withstand multidirectional mechanical stress, thermally stable, numerous shape and geometry, endless textile structures like knitted, woven, braided, etc. and existing textile manufacturing technologies.
Textile reinforcement structures may be classified on the basis of continuity and discontinuity of fibres, reinforcement axis (uniaxial, biaxial, triaxial, and multiaxial), structural integrity (integrated or laminated), dimensions (UD, 2D, or 3D), and manufacturing techniques (non-woven, woven, braided, and knitted), etc. All the fibres are arranged in one direction in unidirectional (UD) preforms and fibres are arranged in two directions (warp and weft) in bidirectional (2D) preform, whereas in 3D preforms all fibres are arranged in three directions [224]. Figure 22 represents 2D and 3D textile structures (preforms) used for composite reinforcement. In 3D structures, constituent yarns are arranged in such a manner that they make a right angle to each other in three mutually perpendicular planes, in which two yarns (i.e., warp and weft) are positioned in X and Y directions, whereas the third yarn binds the weft and warp yarns in Z direction which provides better structural integrity, having substantial thickness higher than yarn diameter, higher fibre volume fraction (45–50%) without any crimp in the yarns [11]. On the other side, in 2D structures, constituent yarns are arranged in such a manner that both yarns in warp and weft directions make a right angle to each other in a single plane. The thickness of 2D structures is small; high thickness can be attained only by sewing and laminating. 2D fabrics are generally poor in plane resistance to shear, anisotropic in nature and comparably low modulus than fibre due to crimp presence. Basic difference between 2 and 3D structures is shown in Table 17. However, the performance of composites was influenced by fibre architecture, and it can contribute up to 90% of composite strength if its construction and design parameters are selected properly. The mechanical behaviour of natural fibre-based 3D woven structural composites for automotive applications was investigated. UD, 2D, and 3D textile structures (shown in Fig. 23) were fabricated using sisal yarn at a 3D customized weaving machine. These preforms were reinforced in epoxy resin to fabricate various composites (shown in Fig. 24) by VARTM technique. The results revealed that specific tensile strength and specific flexural strength of sisal/epoxy composite were found lower than the metallic counterpart, but the izod impact strength of 3D sisal/epoxy composite was found to be higher in comparison with the metallic counterpart [Unpublished]. It was concluded that the structural parameters of 3D woven solid structure could further be optimized to achieve better results. In another study, thermomechanical properties of flax woven fabric reinforced in PLA and PP matrices were investigated by Hasan et al. [225]. The results revealed that the mechanical performance (tensile and flexural) and physical properties (thickness swelling and water absorbency) imparted significant results for the performance of the fabricated bio-composites. Furthermore, the thermal stability of the fabricated bio-composites was also improved. Krishnasamy et al. [226] investigated the vibration and wear behaviour of aloe vera/flax/hemp woven fabric epoxy composite reinforced with wire mesh and BaSO4. The results revealed that the incorporation of wire mesh and BaSO4 reinforcement in the fabricated composite enhanced the wear property and mechanical performance (tensile and compressive strength by 8.68% and 10.72%, respectively) compared to the other composites. Furthermore, the addition of filler enhanced the specific stiffness, which further increased the natural frequency of the beam.
Textile fibre-reinforced aluminium metal matrix composites
TFRAMMC are composites reinforced by textile fibre in aluminium matrix committed for lightweight and load-bearing applications. These composites must have textile fibre (acting as reinforcement) and aluminium matrix; they must have the potential to withstand primary and secondary load in automotive. Aluminium-based metal matrix composites reinforced with textile fibre in the aluminium matrix have many advantages such as superior strength to weight ratio, high modulus, resistance to creep, wear and fatigue properties. Aluminium-based composite materials have high potential application in the automotive sector (piston rod, valve train, piston pin, crankshaft, cylinder head, cylinder blocks, and engine blocks). Today, most car manufacturers, including Volkswagen, Daimler-Chrysler, Honda, Toyota, Nissan, and GM, use aluminium metal matrix-based composites in various applications, as presented in Table 18. A very little effort has been put up so far towards TFRAMMC by the scientific community. Arab et al. [228] fabricated TFRAMMC using milled and chopped E-glass, S-glass, and carbon fibres as reinforcement, and then friction stir processing (FSP) was employed to disperse the textile fibres into the aluminium matrix to improve the mechanical properties. The results revealed that tensile strength, micro-hardness, toughness, and ductility were improved for all the processed samples. Appropriate distribution of the reinforcements in the aluminium matrix was observed by scanning electron micrographs, as shown in Fig. 25. The synergetic effects by reinforcing the fibre into the aluminium matrix and severe plastic deformation (SPD) improved mechanical properties compared to base aluminium. No other studies have been reported on glass or carbon fibres reinforced aluminium metal matrix composites (GFRAMMC or CFRAMMC) fabricated by FSP. These fibres are easy to use and more economical than other conventional reinforcing phases, such as carbon nanotubes [229, 230]. Mertens et al. [231] investigated the mechanical properties of FSPed Mg-Carbon fibre composites, and the results revealed that the yield strength of the composite was increased by 15%-25% as compared to the as-received Mg alloys. It is concluded from the above discussion that FSP has been proven to be a viable approach to homogeneously disperse the textile fibres in the metal matrix [232,233,234,235]. Therefore, more studies will still be needed to explore more advanced technical concepts to fabricate the glass and carbon fibres reinforced aluminium metal matrix composites with better distribution of fibres and improved bonding across the interface, which further explores to clarify the further mechanism for the enhanced properties.
Conclusion
The usage of natural fibre-based composites in automotive industries has gained investment and great focus by the scientific community due to the necessity for eco-friendly, lightweight, and renewable materials with improved properties. In these circumstances, fuel-saving could be achieved through light-weight materials, which results in a reduction of CO2 emission on a large scale. Apart from lightweight multi-material design (MMD) options and metallic alloys, emerging trends in textile fibre-reinforced composite structures provide a feasible solution to develop lightweight vehicles. For long-term sustainability, easy availability, low cost, low density, good acoustic and thermal insulation, environmentally friendly, renewability, recyclability, and adequate mechanical properties make NFRC a substitute for conventional synthetic fibre-based composites. However, their disadvantages, such as moisture absorption, poor interfacial bonding between the natural fibres and matrix, low impact strength, low durability, and poor fire resistance, have restricted them from being considered as an alternative material for traditional composites. Water degradation is the biggest challenge associated with NFCs. It is clear from the assessment of review articles that desired mechanical properties needed for the automotive sector cannot be obtained by natural fibre itself. Although it fulfills the condition of lightweight biodegradability, it delivers minimal adverse impact on the environment due to its carbon neutrality and eco-friendliness. This paper evaluates the several chemical treatment methods which are used to lower the moisture absorption content of natural fibres and enhance their mechanical properties, which makes them an alternative for obtaining lightweight and more environment-friendly materials for the automotive sector. In addition, the concept of vehicle weight reduction, recent advancements in TFRC such as natural-high performance fibre-reinforced hybrid composites, natural filler reinforced polymer nanocomposites, textile structural reinforced polymeric 3D composites, and TFRAMMC have been explored. This paper will assist researchers to initiate further technical advancements in the field of textile fibre-reinforced composites for the automotive industry.
References
Cramer DR, Taggart DF, Inc H (2002) Design and manufacture of an affordable advanced-composite automotive body structure. In: In proceedings from the 19th international battery, hybrid and fuel cell electric vehicle symposium and exhibition. pp 1–12
Zhang J, Chaisombat K, He S, Wang CH (2012) Hybrid composite laminates reinforced with glass/carbon woven fabrics for lightweight load bearing structures. Mater Des 36:75–80
Beardmore P, Johnson CF (1986) The potential for composites in structural automotive applications. Compos Sci Technol 26:251–281
Thilagavathi G, Pradeep ÃE, Kannaian T, Sasikala L (2010) Development of natural fiber nonwovens for application as car interiors for noise control. Journals.sagepubcom 39:267–278
Das S (2001) The cost of automotive polymer composites: a review and assessment of DOE’s lightweight materials composites research. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, pp 1-47. https://technicalreports.ornl.gov/cppr/y2001/rpt/108590_.pdf
Al-Qureshi HA (2001) Automobile leaf springs from composite materials. J Mater Process Technol 118:58–61
Hosseinzadeh R, Shokrieh MM, Lessard LB (2005) Parametric study of automotive composite bumper beams subjected to low-velocity impacts. Compos Struct 68:419–427
Tucker N, Lindsey K (eds. ). (2002) An introduction to automotive composites. iSmithers Rapra Publishing.
Jacob A (2001) Automotive composites—the road ahead. Reinf Plast 45:28–32
Drzal LT, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2001) Bio-composite materials as alternatives to petroleum-based composites for automotive applications. Magnesium 40:1–3
Behera BK, Mishra R (2008) 3-Dimensional weaving. Indian J Fiber Textil Res 33:274–287. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/2017
Natural Fiber Composites Market | Share & Growth, 2020–2027. https://www.reportsanddata.com/report-detail/natural-fiber-composites-market. Accessed 14 Jul 2020
Chen Y, Chiparus O, Sun L et al (2005) Natural fibers for automotive nonwoven composites. J Ind Text 35:47–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083705053392
Tajvidi M, Ebrahimi G (2003) Water uptake and mechanical characteristics of natural filler–polypropylene composites. J Appl Polym Sci 88:941–946. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.12029
Mohamed MH, Bogdanovich AE, Dickinson LC et al (2001) A new generation of 3 D woven fabric preforms and composites. Sampe J 37:8–17
MacWilliams A (2007) advanced materials, lightweight materials in transportation, Report, Report Code: AVM056A
Ghassemieh E (2011) Materials in automotive application, state of the art and prospects. In: New trends and developments in automotive industry. InTech, Marcello chiaberge
Ishikawa T, Amaoka K, Masubuchi Y et al (2018) Overview of automotive structural composites technology developments in Japan. Compos Sci Technol 155:221–246
Cheah LW (2010) Cars on a diet: the material and energy impacts of passenger vehicle weight reduction in the US. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/62760
Joost WJ (2012) Reducing vehicle weight and improving U.S. energy efficiency using integrated computational materials engineering. JOM 64:1032–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-012-0424-z
Friedrich K, Almajid AA (2013) Manufacturing aspects of advanced polymer composites for automotive applications. Appl Compos Mater 20:107–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-012-9258-7
Lutsey N (2010) Review of technical literature and trends related to automobile mass-reduction technology. UCD-ITS-RR-10-10. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/85p4x0jn
Kabir MM, Wang H, Lau KT, Cardona F (2012) Chemical treatments on plant-based natural fibre reinforced polymer composites: An overview. Compos Part B Eng 43:2883–2892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.053
Rong MZ, Zhang MQ, Liu Y et al (2001) The effect of fiber treatment on the mechanical properties of unidirectional sisal-reinforced epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 61:1437–1447. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00046-X
Akil HM, Omar MF, Mazuki AAM et al (2011) Kenaf fiber reinforced composites: a review. Mater Des 32:4107–4121
Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (eds. ). (2005) Natural fibers, biopolymers, and biocomposites. Taylor & Francis.
Krässig HA (1993) Cellulose: structure, accessibility and reactivity. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Yverdon, Switzerland, pp 88–98
Ahmad F, Choi HS, Park MK (2015) A review: natural fiber composites selection in view of mechanical, light weight, and economic properties. Macromol Mater Eng 300:10–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201400089
Huda MS, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2006) Chopped glass and recycled newspaper as reinforcement fibers in injection molded poly (lactic acid)(PLA) composites: a comparative study. Compos Sci Technol 66:1813–1824
Summerscales J, Dissanayake NP, Virk AS, Hall W (2010) A review of bast fibres and their composites. Part 1–Fibres as reinforcements. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 41:1329–1335
Rowell RM, Sanadi AR, Caulfield DF, Jacobson RE (1997) Utilization of natural fibers in plastic composites: problems and opportunities. Lignocellul Compos 13:23–51
Alpár T, Hasan KMF, Horváth PG (2021) Introduction to biomass and biocomposites. In: Sriariyanun M, Rangappa SM, Siengchin S, Dhakal HN (eds) Value-added biocomposites. CRC Press, pp 1–33
Campilho R (2015) Natural fiber composites. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Pujari S, Ramakrishna A, Balaram Padal KT (2017) Investigations on thermal conductivities of jute and banana fiber reinforced epoxy composites. J Inst Eng Ser D 98:79–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-015-0102-8
Li X, Tabil LG, Oguocha IN, Panigrahi S (2008) Thermal diffusivity, thermal conductivity, and specific heat of flax fiber-HDPE biocomposites at processing temperatures. Compos Sci Technol 68:1753–1758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.016
Osugi R, Takagi H, Liu K, Gennai Y (2009) Thermal conductivity behavior of natural fiber-reinforced composites. In: Asian pacific conference for materials and mechanics 2009 at Yokohama, Japan, November 13–16. pp 2–4
Ramanaiah K, Prasad AVR, Chandra Reddy KH (2013) Mechanical and thermo-physical properties of fish tail palm tree natural fiber-reinforced polyester composites. Int J Polym Anal Charact 18:126–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1023666X.2013.747464
Annie Paul S, Boudenne A, Ibos L et al (2008) Effect of fiber loading and chemical treatments on thermophysical properties of banana fiber/polypropylene commingled composite materials. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 39:1582–1588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.06.004
Agrawal R, Saxena NS, Sreekala MS, Thomas S (2000) Effect of treatment on the thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity of oil-palm-fiber-reinforced phenolformaldehyde composites. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 38:916–921. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(20000401)38:7%3c916::AID-POLB2%3e3.0.CO;2-0
Methacanon P, Weerawatsophon U, Sumransin N et al (2010) Properties and potential application of the selected natural fibers as limited life geotextiles. Carbohydr Polym 82:1090–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.06.036
Kozłowski R, Władyka-Przybylak M (2008) Flammability and fire resistance of composites reinforced by natural fibers. Polym Adv Technol 19:446–453
Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (2001) Surface modifications of natural fibers and performance of the resulting biocomposites: an overview. Compos Interfaces 8:313–343. https://doi.org/10.1163/156855401753255422
John MJ, Anandjiwala RD (2008) Recent developments in chemical modification and characterization of natural fiber-reinforced composites. Polym Compos 29:187–207
Joseph P (2001) Studies on short sisal fibre reinforced isotactic polypropylene composites. Mahatma Gandhi University, India
Satyanarayana KG, Arizaga GGC, Wypych F (2009) Biodegradable composites based on lignocellulosic fibers-an overview. Prog Polym Sci 34:982–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.12.002
Wielage B, Lampke T, Marx G et al (1999) Thermogravimetric and differential scanning calorimetric analysis of natural fibres and polypropylene. Thermochim Acta 337:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0040-6031(99)00161-6
Yao F, Wu Q, Lei Y, Guo W, Xu Y (2008) Thermal decomposition kinetics of natural fibers: activation energy with dynamic thermogravimetric analysis. Polym Degrad Stab 93:90–98. https://doi.org/10.1179/014426009X12448168550109
Dicker MPM, Duckworth PF, Baker AB et al (2014) Green composites: a review of material attributes and complementary applications. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 56:280–289
Ferreira FV, Francisco W, Menezes BRC et al (2016) Correlation of surface treatment, dispersion and mechanical properties of HDPE/CNT nanocomposites. Appl Surf Sci 389:921–929
Ferreira FV, Brito FS, Franceschi W et al (2018) Functionalized graphene oxide as reinforcement in epoxy based nanocomposites. Surfaces and Interfaces 10:100–109
Burakowski L, Rezende MC (2001) Modificação da rugosidade de fibras de carbono por método químico para aplicação em compósitos poliméricos. Polímeros 11:51–57
Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink H-P, Sain M (2012) Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog Polym Sci 37:1552–1596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003
Koo J (2016) Basics of polymer matrices and composites. In: Koo JH (ed) Fundamentals, properties, and applications of polymer nanocomposites. Cambridge University Press, pp 109–129
Sinha R (2004) Outlines of polymer technology: manufacture of polymers. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi
Mohammad NAB (2007) Synthesis, characterization and properties of the new unsaturated polyester resins for composite applications. MARA University of Technology
Iijima T, Tochimoto T, Tomoi M (1991) Modification of epoxy resins with poly(aryl ether ketone)s. J Appl Polym Sci 43:1685–1692. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1991.070430911
Mukherjee RN, Pal SK, Sanyal SK, Phani KK (1984) Role of interface in fibre reinforced polymer composites with special reference to natural fibres. J Polym Mater 1:69–81
Pritchard G (2012) Developments in reinforced plastics—4. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, New York
Sarkar BK, Roy R, Ray D (1997) Emerging dominance of composites as a structural material. J-Inst Eng India Part MM Metall Mater Sci Div 78:31–37
Baeurle SA, Hotta A, Gusev AA (2006) On the glassy state of multiphase and pure polymer materials. Polymer (Guildf) 47:6243–6253
Lokensgard E (2016) Industrial plastics: theory and applications. Cengage Learning
Gholampour A, Ozbakkaloglu T (2020) A review of natural fiber composites: properties, modification and processing techniques, characterization, applications. J Mater Sci 55:829–892
Kuruppalil Z (2011) Green plastics: an emerging alternative for petroleum-based plastics. Int J Eng Res Innov 3:59–64
Bastioli C (2001) Global status of the production of biobased packaging materials. Starch-Stärke 53:351–355
Edgar KJ, Buchanan CM, Debenham JS et al (2001) Advances in cellulose ester performance and application. Prog Polym Sci 26:1605–1688
Volova T (2004) Polyhydroxyalkanoates–plastic materials of the 21st century: production, properties, applications. Nova Science Publishers, New York
Sharma SK, Mudhoo A (2011) A handbook of applied biopolymer technology: synthesis. Degradation and Applications. Royal Society of Chemistry
Gassan J, Gutowski VS (2000) Effects of corona discharge and UV treatment on the properties of Jute-Fibre Epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 60:2857–2863. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00168-8
Hirai Y, Hamada H, Kim JK (1998) Impact response of woven glass-fabric composites—I: effect of fibre surface treatment. Compos Sci Technol 58:91–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00111-5
Haq MIU, Raina A, Vohra K et al (2018) An assessment of tribological characteristics of different materials under sea water environment. Mater Today Proc 5:3602–3609
Rowell RM (1998) Property enhanced natural fiber composite materials based on chemical modification. Science and Technology of Polymers and Advanced Materials. Plenum Press, New York, pp 717–732
Azwa ZN, Yousif BF, Manalo AC, Karunasena W (2013) A review on the degradability of polymeric composites based on natural fibres. Mater Des 47:424–442
Stevens C (2010) Industrial applications of natural fibres: structure, properties and technical applications. John Wiley & Sons
Hasan KMF, Horváth PG, Alpár T (2021) Potential fabric-reinforced composites: a comprehensive review. J Mater Sci 56:14381–14415
Saheb DN, Jog JP (1999) Natural fiber polymer composites: a review. Adv Polym Technol J Polym Process Inst 18:351–363
Riccieri JE, De Carvalho LH, Vázquez A (1999) Interfacial properties and initial step of the water sorption in unidirectional unsaturated polyester/vegetable fiber composites. Polym Compos 20:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.10332
Luo S, Netravali AN (1999) Mechanical and thermal properties of environment-friendly “green” composites made from pineapple leaf fibers and poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-valerate) resin. Polym Compos 20:367–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.10363
Fung W, Hardcastle JM (2000) Textiles in automotive engineering. Woodhead Publishing limited, UK
Bledzki AK, Faruk O, Sperber VE (2006) Cars from bio-fibres. Macromol Mater Eng 291:449–457
Bledzki AK, Mamun AA, Lucka-Gabor M, Gutowski VS (2008) The effects of acetylation on properties of flax fibre and its polypropylene composites. Express Polym Lett 2:413–422. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.50
Komuraiah A, Kumar NS, Prasad BD (2014) Chemical composition of natural fibers and its influence on their mechanical properties. Mech Compos Mater 50:359–376
Harish S, Michael DP, Bensely A et al (2009) Mechanical property evaluation of natural fiber coir composite. Mater Charact 60:44–49
Goriparthi BK, Suman KNS, Rao NM (2012) Effect of fiber surface treatments on mechanical and abrasive wear performance of polylactide/jute composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 43:1800–1808
Agrawal R, Saxena NS, Sharma KB et al (2000) Activation energy and crystallization kinetics of untreated and treated oil palm fibre reinforced phenol formaldehyde composites. Mater Sci Eng A 277:77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-5093(99)00556-0
Saravanakumar SS, Kumaravel A, Nagarajan T, Moorthy IG (2014) Investigation of physico-chemical properties of alkali-treated Prosopis juliflora fibers. Int J Polym Anal Charact 19:309–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/1023666X.2014.902527
Arthanarieswaran A, Kumaravel VP, Saravanakumar SS (2015) Physico-chemical properties of alkali-treated Acacia leucophloea fibers. Int J Polym Anal Charact 20:704–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/1023666X.2015.1081133
Rajkumar R, Manikandan A, Saravanakumar SS (2016) Physicochemical properties of alkali-treated new cellulosic fiber from cotton shell. Int J Polym Anal Charact 21:359–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/1023666X.2016.1160509
Reddy KO, Maheswari CU, Shukla M et al (2013) Tensile and structural characterization of alkali treated Borassus fruit fine fibers. Compos Part B Eng 44:433–438
Reddy KO, Maheswari CU, Rajulu AV, Guduri BR (2009) Thermal degradation parameters and tensile properties of Borassus flabellifer fruit fiber reinforcement. J Reinf Plast Compos 28:2297–2301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684408092380
Senthamaraikannan P, Kathiresan M (2018) Characterization of raw and alkali treated new natural cellulosic fiber from Coccinia grandis.L. Carbohydr Polym 186:332–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.072
Shanmugasundaram I, Rajendran N, Ramkumar T (2018) Characterization of untreated and alkali treated new cellulosic fiber from an Areca palm leaf stalk as potential reinforcement in polymer composites. Carbohydr Polym 195:566–575
Reddy KO, Maheswari CU, Reddy DJP, Rajulu AV (2009) Thermal properties of Napier grass fibers. Mater Lett 63:2390–2392
Liu Y, Ma Y, Yu J et al (2019) Development and characterization of alkali treated abaca fiber reinforced friction composites. Compos Interfaces 26:67–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/09276440.2018.1472456
Herlina Sari N, Wardana ING, Irawan YS, Siswanto E (2018) Characterization of the chemical, physical, and mechanical properties of NaOH-treated natural cellulosic fibers from corn husks. J Nat Fibers 15:545–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2017.1349707
Sonnier R, Taguet A, Ferry L, Lopez-Cuesta JM (2018) Flame retardancy of natural fibers reinforced composites. Towards bio-based flame retardant polymers. Springer, Cham., pp 73–98
Li X, Tabil LG, Panigrahi S (2007) Chemical treatments of natural fiber for use in natural fiber-reinforced composites: a review. J Polym Environ 15:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-006-0042-3
Ouajai S, Shanks RA (2005) Composition, structure and thermal degradation of hemp cellulose after chemical treatments. Polym Degrad Stab 89:327–335
Ray D, Sarkar BK, Rana AK, Bose NR (2001) Effect of alkali treated jute fibres on composite properties. Bull Mater Sci 24:129–135
Prasad SV, Pavithran C, Rohatgi PK (1983) Alkali treatment of coir fibres for coir-polyester composites. J Mater Sci 18:1443–1454. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01111964
Asim M, Jawaid M, Abdan K, Ishak MR (2016) Effect of alkali and silane treatments on mechanical and fibre-matrix bond strength of kenaf and pineapple leaf fibres. J Bionic Eng 13:426–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60315-3
Asim M, Paridah MT, Saba N et al (2018) Thermal, physical properties and flammability of silane treated kenaf/pineapple leaf fibres phenolic hybrid composites. Compos Struct 202:1330–1338
Atiqah A, Jawaid M, Ishak MR, Sapuan SM (2018) Effect of alkali and silane treatments on mechanical and interfacial bonding strength of sugar palm fibers with thermoplastic polyurethane. J Nat Fibers 15:251–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2017.1325427
Sepe R, Bollino F, Boccarusso L, Caputo F (2018) Influence of chemical treatments on mechanical properties of hemp fiber reinforced composites. Compos Part B Eng 133:201–217
Indira KN, Jyotishkumar P, Thomas S (2012) Thermal stability and degradation of banana fibre/PF composites fabricated by RTM. Fibers Polym 13:1319–1325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-012-1319-x
Singha AS, Thakur VK (2009) Synthesis and characterizations of silane treated Grewia optiva fibers. Int J Polym Anal Charact 14:301–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10236660902871470
Singha AS, Thakur VK, Mehta IK et al (2009) Surface-modified Hibiscus sabdariffa fibers: physicochemical, thermal, and morphological properties evaluation. Int J Polym Anal Charact 14:695–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/10236660903325518
Sreekala MS, Kumaran MG, Thomas S (1997) Oil palm fibers: Morphology, chemical composition, surface modification, and mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 66:821–835
Xie Y, Xiao Z, Militz H, Hao X (2017) Silane coupling agents used in natural fiber/plastic composites. In: Handbook of composites from renewable materials, functionalization. Scrivener Publications, pp 1219–1228
Zegaoui A, Ma R, Dayo AQ et al (2018) Morphological, mechanical and thermal properties of cyanate ester/benzoxazine resin composites reinforced by silane treated natural hemp fibers. Chinese J Chem Eng 26:1219–1228
Valadez-Gonzalez A, Cervantes-Uc JM, Olayo R, Herrera-Franco PJ (1999) Chemical modification of henequen fibers with an organosilane coupling agent. Compos Part B Eng 30:321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00055-9
Seki Y (2009) Innovative multifunctional siloxane treatment of jute fiber surface and its effect on the mechanical properties of jute/thermoset composites. Mater Sci Eng A 508:247–252
Xu Y, Kawata S, Hosoi K et al (2009) Thermomechanical properties of the silanized-kenaf/polystyrene composites. Express Polym Lett 3:657–664. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2009.82
Ismail H, Khalil HA (2000) The effects of partial replacement of oil palm wood flour by silica and silane coupling agent on properties of natural rubber compounds. Polym Test 20:33–41
Khalil HA, Ismail H (2000) Effect of acetylation and coupling agent treatments upon biological degradation of plant fibre reinforced polyester composites. Polym Test 20:65–75
Cantero G, Arbelaiz A, Llano-Ponte R, Mondragon I (2003) Effects of fibre treatment on wettability and mechanical behaviour of flax/polypropylene composites. Compos Sci Technol 63:1247–1254
Huda MS, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2008) Effect of chemical modifications of the pineapple leaf fiber surfaces on the interfacial and mechanical properties of laminated biocomposites. Compos Interfaces 15:169–191. https://doi.org/10.1163/156855408783810920
Valadez-Gonzalez A, Cervantes-Uc JM, Olayo RJIP, Herrera-Franco PJ (1999) Effect of fiber surface treatment on the fiber–matrix bond strength of natural fiber reinforced composites. Compos Part B Eng 30:309–320
Nishino T, Hirao K, Kotera M (2006) X-ray diffraction studies on stress transfer of kenaf reinforced poly (L-lactic acid) composite. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 37:2269–2273
Sreekala MS, Kumaran MG, Joseph S et al (2000) Oil palm fibre reinforced phenol formaldehyde composites: influence of fibre surface modifications on the mechanical performance. Appl Compos Mater 7:295–329. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026534006291
Tserki V, Zafeiropoulos NE, Simon F, Panayiotou C (2005) A study of the effect of acetylation and propionylation surface treatments on natural fibres. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 36:1110–1118
Mwaikambo LY, Ansell MP (1999) The effect of chemical treatment on the properties of hemp, sisal, jute and kapok for composite reinforcement. Die Angew Makromol Chemie 272:108–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-9505(19991201)272:1%3c108::AID-APMC108%3e3.0.CO;2-9
Mishra S, Mohanty AK, Drzal LT et al (2003) Studies on mechanical performance of biofibre/glass reinforced polyester hybrid composites. Compos Sci Technol 63:1377–1385
Joseph S, Koshy P, Thomas S (2005) The role of interfacial interactions on the mechanical properties of banana fibre reinforced phenol formaldehyde composites. Compos Interfaces 12:581–600. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568554054915183
Zafeiropoulos NE, Baillie CA, Hodgkinson JM (2002) Engineering and characterisation of the interface in flax fibre/polypropylene composite materials. Part II. The effect of surface treatments on the interface. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 33:1185–1190
Zafeiropoulos NE, Williams DR, Baillie CA, Matthews FL (2002) Engineering and characterisation of the interface in flax fibre/polypropylene composite materials. Part I. Development and investigation of surface treatments. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 33:1083–1093
Joseph S, Oommen Z, Thomas S (2006) Environmental durability of banana-fiber-reinforced phenol formaldehyde composites. J Appl Polym Sci 100:2521–2531. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.23680
Luz SM, Del Tio J, Rocha GJM et al (2008) Cellulose and cellulignin from sugarcane bagasse reinforced polypropylene composites: effect of acetylation on mechanical and thermal properties. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 39:1362–1369
Keener TJ, Stuart RK, Brown TK (2004) Maleated coupling agents for natural fibre composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 35:357–362
dos Santos PA, Giriolli JC, Amarasekera J, Moraes G (2008) Natural fibers plastic composites for automotive applications. In: 8th Annual automotive composites conference and exhibition (ACCE 2008). Troy, MI: SPE Automotive & Composites Division. pp 492–500
Mohanty S, Nayak SK, Verma SK, Tripathy SS (2004) Effect of MAPP as a coupling agent on the performance of jute–PP composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 23:625–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684404032868
Mishra S, Naik JB, Patil YP (2000) The compatibilising effect of maleic anhydride on swelling and mechanical properties of plant-fiber-reinforced novolac composites. Compos Sci Technol 60:1729–1735
Yang HS, Kim HJ, Park HJ et al (2007) Effect of compatibilizing agents on rice-husk flour reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos Struct 77:45–55
Mohanty S, Verma SK, Nayak SK, Tripathy SS (2004) Influence of fiber treatment on the performance of sisal–polypropylene composites. J Appl Polym Sci 94:1336–1345. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.21161
Han G, Lei Y, Wu Q et al (2008) Bamboo–fiber filled high density polyethylene composites: effect of coupling treatment and nanoclay. J Polym Environ 16:123–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-008-0094-7
Xue Y, Veazie DR, Glinsey C et al (2007) Environmental effects on the mechanical and thermomechanical properties of aspen fiber–polypropylene composites. Compos Part B Eng 38:152–158
Lu JZ, Wu Q, Negulescu II (2005) Wood-fiber/high-density-polyethylene composites: coupling agent performance. J Appl Polym Sci 96:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.21410
Mutjé P, Vallejos ME, Girones J et al (2006) Effect of maleated polypropylene as coupling agent for polypropylene composites reinforced with hemp strands. J Appl Polym Sci 102:833–840. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.24315
Nair KM, Thomas S, Groeninckx G (2001) Thermal and dynamic mechanical analysis of polystyrene composites reinforced with short sisal fibres. Compos Sci Technol 61:2519–2529
Ali A, Shaker K, Nawab Y et al (2018) Hydrophobic treatment of natural fibers and their composites—a review. J Ind Text 47:2153–2183
Joseph K, Thomas S, Pavithran C (1996) Effect of chemical treatment on the tensile properties of short sisal fibre-reinforced polyethylene composites. Polymer (Guildf) 37:5139–5149
Wang B, Panigrahi S, Tabil L, Crerar W (2007) Pre-treatment of flax fibers for use in rotationally molded biocomposites. J Reinf Plast Compos 26:447–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684406072526
Pickering KL, Li Y, Farrell RL, Lay M (2007) Interfacial modification of hemp fiber reinforced composites using fungal and alkali treatment. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy 1:109–117. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbmb.2007.012
Jafari MA, Nikkhah A, Sadeghi AA, Chamani M (2007) The effect of Pleurotus spp. fungi on chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of rice straw. Pak J Biol Sci 10:2660–2664
Kozłowski RM, Różańska W (2012) Enzymatic treatment of natural fibres. In: In handbook of natural fibres. Woodhead Publishing, pp 227–244
Bledzki AK, Mamun AA, Jaszkiewicz A, Erdmann K (2010) Polypropylene composites with enzyme modified abaca fibre. Compos Sci Technol 70:854–860
George M, Mussone PG, Bressler DC (2014) Surface and thermal characterization of natural fibres treated with enzymes. Ind Crops Prod 53:365–373
Buschle-Diller G, Fanter C, Loth F (1999) Structural changes in hemp fibers as a result of enzymatic hydrolysis with mixed enzyme systems. Text Res J 69:244–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051759906900403
Muniyasamy S (2011) Oxo-biodegradation of full carbon backbone polymers under different environmental conditions. University of Pisa
Pagga U, Beimborn DB, Boelens J, De Wilde B (1995) Determination of the aerobic biodegradability of polymeric material in a laboratory controlled composting test. Chemosphere 31:4475–4487. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(95)00326-4
Scherübl B, Hintermann M (2005) Application of natural fibre reinforced plastics for automotive exterior parts, with a focus on underfloor systems. In: Proceedings of the 8th international AVK-TV conference, Baden, Germany, (p. D5).
Verma D, Sharma S (2017) Green biocomposites: a prospective utilization in automobile industry. Green Energy Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49382-4_8
Gupta MK, Srivastava RK (2016) Mechanical properties of hybrid fibers-reinforced polymer composite: a review. Polym - Plast Technol Eng 55:626–642
Huda MS, Drzal LT, Ray D, et al (2008) Natural-fiber composites in the automotive sector. In: In properties and performance of natural-fibre composites. Woodhead Publishing, pp 221–268
Holbery J, Houston D (2006) Natural-fiber-reinforced polymer composites in automotive applications. JOM 58:80–86
Pickering KL, Efendy MGA, Le TM (2016) A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 83:98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038
Dittenber DB, Gangarao HVS (2012) Critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 43:1419–1429
Elkington M, Bloom D, Ward C et al (2015) Hand layup: understanding the manual process. Adv Manuf Polym Compos Sci 1:138–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/20550340.2015.1114801
Sèbe G, Cetin NS, Hill CAS, Hughes M (2000) RTM hemp fibre-reinforced polyester composites. Appl Compos Mater 7:341–349. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026538107200
Dai D, Fan M (2014) Wood fibres as reinforcements in natural fibre composites: structure, properties, processing and applications. In: In natural fibre composites. Woodhead Publishing, pp 3–65
Richardson MOW, Zhang ZY (2000) Experimental investigation and flow visualization of the resin transfer mould filling process for non-woven hemp reinforced phenolic composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 31:1303–1310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00008-7
Summerscales J, Searle TJ (2005) Low-pressure (vacuum infusion) techniques for moulding large composite structures. In: Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, Part L: Journal of materials: design and applications. pp 45–58
Goren A, Atas C (2008) Manufacturing of polymer matrix composites using vacuum assisted resin infusion molding. Arch Mater Sci Eng 34:117–120
Pan P, Zhu B, Kai W et al (2007) Crystallization behavior and mechanical properties of bio-based green composites based on poly(L-lactide) and kenaf fiber. J Appl Polym Sci 105:1511–1520. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.26407
Hebel DE, Javadian A, Heisel F, et al (2014) Process-controlled optimization of the tensile strength of bamboo fiber composites for structural applications. In: Composites part b: engineering. pp 125–131
Pothan LA, Oommen Z, Thomas S (2003) Dynamic mechanical analysis of banana fiber reinforced polyester composites. Compos Sci Technol 63:283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00254-3
Khan SM, Malik SA, Gull N et al (2019) Fabrication and modelling of the macro-mechanical properties of cross-ply laminated fibre-reinforced polymer composites using artificial neural network. Adv Compos Mater 28:409–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243046.2019.1573448
Xiong X, Shen SZ, Hua L et al (2018) Finite element models of natural fibers and their composites: A review. J Reinf Plast Compos 37:617–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684418755552
Virk AS, Hall W, Summerscales J (2012) Modulus and strength prediction for natural fibre composites. Mater Sci Technol 28:864–871. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284712Y.0000000022
Kalaprasad G, Joseph K, Thomas S, Pavithran C (1997) Theoretical modelling of tensile properties of short sisal fibre-reinforced low-density polyethylene composites. J Mater Sci 32:4261–4267. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018651218515
Migneault S, Koubaa A, Erchiqui F et al (2011) Application of micromechanical models to tensile properties of wood-plastic composites. Wood Sci Technol 45:521–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-010-0351-5
Beckermann GW, Pickering KL (2009) Engineering and evaluation of hemp fibre reinforced polypropylene composites: Micro-mechanics and strength prediction modelling. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 40:210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.11.005
Facca AG, Kortschot MT, Yan N (2006) Predicting the elastic modulus of natural fibre reinforced thermoplastics. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 37:1660–1671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.10.006
Munde YS, Ingle RB (2015) Theoretical modeling and experimental verification of mechanical properties of natural fiber reinforced thermoplastics. Procedia Technol 19:320–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2015.02.046
Kern WT, Kim W, Argento A et al (2016) Finite element analysis and microscopy of natural fiber composites containing microcellular voids. Mater Des 106:285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.094
Modniks J, Andersons J (2010) Modeling elastic properties of short flax fiber-reinforced composites by orientation averaging. Comput Mater Sci 50:595–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.09.022
Sliseris J, Yan L, Kasal B (2016) Numerical modelling of flax short fibre reinforced and flax fibre fabric reinforced polymer composites. Compos Part B Eng 89:143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.038
Gopalan V, Suthenthiraveerappa V, Annamalai AR et al (2021) Dynamic characteristics of woven flax/epoxy laminated composite plate. Polymers (Basel) 13:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13020209
Lucintel. Opportunities in natural fiber composites, available from: http://www.lucintel.com/ (2011, accessed 27 December 2015).
Bos HL (2004) The potential of flax fibres as reinforcement for composite materials. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven
Suddell BC (2008) Industrial fibres: recent and current developments. In Proceedings of the symposium on natural fibres. In: Rome: FAO and CFC. pp 71–82
Bledzki AK, Faruk O, Jaszkiewicz A (2010) Cars from renewable materials.
La Mantia FP, Morreale M (2011) Green composites: a brief review. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 42:579–588
Marsh G (2003) Next step for automotive materials. Mater Today 6:36–43
Chauhan V, Kärki T, Varis J (2019) Review of natural fiber-reinforced engineering plastic composites, their applications in the transportation sector and processing techniques. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705719889095
Koronis G, Silva A, Fontul M (2013) Green composites: A review of adequate materials for automotive applications. Compos Part B Eng 44:120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.004
Choudhury A (2008) Isothermal crystallization and mechanical behavior of ionomer treated sisal/HDPE composites. Mater Sci Eng A 491:492–500
Toyota Green Innovations. https://www.toyota-europe.com/world-of-toyota/feel/environmental-sustainability
De Bruijn JCM (2000) Natural fibre mat thermoplastic products from a processor’s point of view. Appl Compos Mater 7:415–420. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026554610834
Alrahman LA, Rahman RA (2013) Experimental study on natural fibers for green acoustic absorption materials. Am J Appl Sci 10:1307–1314. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2013.1307.1314
Future Fibres: Publications. http://www.fao.org/economic/futurefibres/resources2/en/. Accessed 28 Jun 2020
Edana. Automotive nonwovens. Newsletter. https://www.edana.org/nw-related-industry/nonwovens-in-daily-life/automotive
Pickering K (2008) Properties and performance of natural-fibre composites. Woodhead Publishing Limited, UK
Li M, Pu Y, Thomas VM et al (2020) Recent advancements of plant-based natural fiber–reinforced composites and their applications. Compos Part B Eng 200:108254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108254
Carus M, Eder A, Dammer L, et al (2015) Wood-plastic composites (WPC) and natural fibre composites (NFC): European and global markets 2012 and future trends in automotive and construction
Thwe MM, Liao K (2003) Durability of bamboo-glass fiber reinforced polymer matrix hybrid composites. Compos Sci Technol 63:375–387
Fu SY, Xu G, Mai YW (2002) On the elastic modulus of hybrid particle/short-fiber/polymer composites. Compos Part B Eng 33:291–299
Sreekala MS, George J, Kumaran MG, Thomas S (2002) The mechanical performance of hybrid phenol-formaldehyde-based composites reinforced with glass and oil palm fibres. Compos Sci Technol 62:339–353
Olorunnishola AAG, Adubi EG (2018) A comparative analysis of a blend of natural jute and glass fibers with synthetic glass fibers composites as car bumper materials. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng 15:67–71
Hasan KMF, Horváth PG, Alpár T (2021) Thermomechanical behavior of methylene diphenyl diisocyanate-bonded flax/glass woven fabric reinforced laminated composites. ACS Omega 6:6124–6133. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c04798
Kim DH, Kim HG, Kim HS (2015) Design optimization and manufacture of hybrid glass/carbon fiber reinforced composite bumper beam for automobile vehicle. Compos Struct 131:742–752
Davoodi MM, Sapuan SM, Ahmad D et al (2010) Mechanical properties of hybrid kenaf/glass reinforced epoxy composite for passenger car bumper beam. Mater Des 31:4927–4932
Mastura MT, Sapuan SM, Mansor MR, Nuraini AA (2017) Conceptual design of a natural fibre-reinforced composite automotive anti-roll bar using a hybrid approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:2031–2048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9882-8
Mastura MT, Sapuan SM, Mansor MR, Nuraini AA (2017) Environmentally conscious hybrid bio-composite material selection for automotive anti-roll bar. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:2203–2219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9217-9
Bayrakceken H, Tasgetiren S, Aslantas K (2006) Fracture of an automobile anti-roll bar. Eng Fail Anal 13:732–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.04.002
Bajpai PK, Singh I, Madaan J (2013) Tribological behavior of natural fiber reinforced PLA composites. Wear 297:829–840
Zhen-Yu W, Jie W, Feng-Hong C et al (2019) Influence of banana fiber on physicomechanical and tribological properties of phenolic based friction composites. Mater Res Express 6:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab160a
Choosri S, Sombatsompop N, Wimolmala E, Thongsang S (2019) Potential use of fly ash and bagasse ash as secondary abrasives in phenolic composites for eco-friendly brake pads applications. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D J Automob Eng 233:1296–1305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407018772240
Matějka V, Fu Z, Kukutschová J et al (2013) Jute fibers and powderized hazelnut shells as natural fillers in non-asbestos organic non-metallic friction composites. Mater Des 51:847–853
Eriksson M, Jacobson S (2000) Tribological surfaces of organic brake pads. Tribol Int 33:817–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-679X(00)00127-4
Ajayan PM, Schadler LS, Braun PV (2003) Nanocomposite science and technology. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co, KGaA, Weinheim, Germany
Hasan KMF, Horváth PG, Zsolt K, Alpár T (2021) Design and fabrication technology in biocomposite manufacturing. In: Sriariyanun M, Rangappa, SM, Siengchin S, Dhakal HN (eds) Value-added biocomposites. CRC Press, pp 157–188
Njuguna J, Pielichowski K, Desai S (2008) Nanofiller-reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Polym Adv Technol 19:947–959
Horzum N, Arik N, Truong YB (2017) Nanofibers for fiber-reinforced composites. In: Ozgur Seydibeyoglu M, Mohanty AK, Misra M (eds) In fiber technology for fiber-reinforced composites. Woodhead Publishing, pp 251–275
Demiroglu S, Singaravelu V, Seydibeyoğlu MÖ, et al (2017) The use of nanotechnology for fibre-reinforced polymer composites. In: Ozgur Seydibeyoglu M, Mohanty AK, Misra M (eds) In fiber technology for fiber-reinforced composites. Woodhead Publishing., pp 277–297
Gacitua W, Ballerini A, Zhang J (2005) Polymer nanocomposites: synthetic and natural fillers a review. Maderas Cienc y Tecnol 7:159–178
Liu T, Lim KP, Tjiu WC et al (2003) Preparation and characterization of nylon 11/organoclay nanocomposites. Polymer (Guildf) 44:3529–3535
Roy S, Lu H, Vengadassalam K, Hussain F (2004) Compressive strength enhancement of pultruded thermoplastic composites using nanoclay reinforcement. In 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures. In: Structural dynamics & materials conference. pp 2263–2277
Usuki A, Kawasumi M, Kojima Y et al (1993) Swelling behavior of montmorillonite cation exchanged for ω-amino acids by∊-caprolactam. J Mater Res 8:1174–1178
Zhang X, Huang Y, Wang T, Liu L (2007) Influence of fibre surface oxidation–reduction followed by silsesquioxane coating treatment on interfacial mechanical properties of carbon fibre/polyarylacetylene composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 38:936–944
Chen W, Tao X, Liu Y (2006) Carbon nanotube-reinforced polyurethane composite fibers. Compos Sci Technol 66:3029–3034
Sen A, Kumar S (2010) Coir-fiber-based fire retardant nano filler for epoxy composites. J Therm Anal Calorim 101:265–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-009-0637-8
Ji Y, Li B, Ge S et al (2006) Structure and nanomechanical characterization of electrospun PS/clay nanocomposite fibers. Langmuir 22:1321–1328. https://doi.org/10.1021/la0525022
Schmidt H (1994) Multifunctional inorganic-organic composite sol-gel coatings for glass surfaces. J Non Cryst Solids 178:302–312
Dash BP (2013) Modelling and characterization of 3D woven solid structures and their composites. Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India. http://eprint.iitd.ac.in/bitstream/handle/12345678/6511/TH-4512.pdf?sequence=2
Hasan KMF, Horváth PG, Markó G, Alpár T (2021) Thermomechanical characteristics of flax-woven-fabric-reinforced poly(lactic acid) and polypropylene biocomposites. Green Mater. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgrma.20.00052
Krishnasamy P, Rajamurugan G, Aravindraj S, Sudhagar PE (2020) Vibration and wear characteristics of aloevera/flax/hemp woven fiber epoxy composite reinforced with wire mesh and BaSO4. J Nat Fibers. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.1835782
Khatkar V, Behera BK, Manjunath RN (2020) Textile structural composites for automotive leaf spring application. Compos Part B Eng 182:1–8
Arab SM, Karimi S, Jahromi SAJ et al (2015) Fabrication of novel fiber reinforced aluminum composites by friction stir processing. Mater Sci Eng A 632:50–57
Izadi H, Gerlich AP (2012) Distribution and stability of carbon nanotubes during multi-pass friction stir processing of carbon nanotube/aluminum composites. Carbon N Y 50:4744–4749
Lim DK, Shibayanagi T, Gerlich AP (2009) Synthesis of multi-walled CNT reinforced aluminium alloy composite via friction stir processing. Mater Sci Eng A 507:194–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.11.067
Mertens A, Simar A, Adrien J et al (2015) Influence of fibre distribution and grain size on the mechanical behaviour of friction stir processed Mg–C composites. Mater Charact 107:125–133
Liu ZY, Xiao BL, Wang WG, Ma ZY (2012) Singly dispersed carbon nanotube/aluminum composites fabricated by powder metallurgy combined with friction stir processing. Carbon N Y 50:1843–1852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.12.034
Arora HS, Singh H, Dhindaw BK (2012) Composite fabrication using friction stir processing—a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61:1043–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3758-8
Maurya R, Kumar B, Ariharan S et al (2016) Effect of carbonaceous reinforcements on the mechanical and tribological properties of friction stir processed Al6061 alloy. Mater Des 98:155–166
Morisada Y, Fujii H, Nagaoka T, Fukusumi M (2006) MWCNTs/AZ31 surface composites fabricated by friction stir processing. Mater Sci Eng A 419:344–348
Prasad SV, Asthana R (2004) Aluminum metal-matrix composites for automotive applications: tribological considerations. Tribol Lett 17:445–453. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRIL.0000044492.91991.f3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Stephen Eichhorn.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olhan, S., Khatkar, V. & Behera, B.K. Review: Textile-based natural fibre-reinforced polymeric composites in automotive lightweighting. J Mater Sci 56, 18867–18910 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06509-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06509-6