Introduction

Amorphous materials that show negative resistance or switching behavior first have been reported by many authors [18]. Semiconducting glasses and specially oxide glasses containing transition metal oxides (TMOs) can exhibit an OFF–ON transition from high to low resistive state (switching) at a certain voltage. The dc voltage, at which the transition from OFF to ON state takes place, is called the “threshold voltage” and termed as V th [210]. V th depends on different parameters such as temperature, electrode distance, and composition of the samples. Oxide glasses have attracted a great interest fundamentally and technologically owing to their potential applications as cathodes for lithium batteries [11, 12], electronic and optoelectronic devices [1315], and high-speed and high-capacity nonvolatile memories such as flash memories [16]; therefore, the investigation of the I–V characteristics and switching behavior of such amorphous semiconductors can play an important role to understand the mechanism of negative resistance/switching and also to find a suitable material for device applications such as fast electrical switches. At high electric fields, most of oxide glasses such as TeO2–V2O5–MoO3 [7, 9, 10], P2O5–Li2MoO4–Li2O and P2O5–Na2MoO4–Na2O [5] show non-ohmic conduction leading to negative resistance/switching phenomenon. Such nonlinear current–voltage (I–V) characteristics have been explained up on the Pool–Frenkel effect. Two kinds of switching phenomena (i.e., memory and threshold) must be distinguished [1, 2, 7, 8]. The most frequent anomalous conduction types observed in semiconducting oxide glasses are summarized in Fig. 1 [1722]. The switching effect has given rise to many models, which the most frequent are thermal model [18, 23], electrothermal model [18], and electronic model [18, 24].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Different types of negative resistance/switching behavior [19], a negative resistance without memory b negative resistance with memory c threshold switching d memory switching e voltage-controlled negative resistance

In the thermal mechanism, the transition between insulating to a conducting state is caused mainly by a joule heating effect, which is responsible for increasing of the temperature with subsequent reversible phase transition. The electronic mechanism, developed for switching in thin films, assumes no heating of samples and results from space charges localized at the electrodes. Electrothermal mechanism, as a hybrid of two other mechanisms, is associated with formation of both hot conductive channels in the material and space charges at electrodes [19].

In our previous works, we have studied the optical and some thermal properties [15] and also the low-field dc conductivity [17] of the present glasses; thus, because of (i) fundamentally and technologically mentioned importance of tellurate-vanadate oxide glasses and (ii) lack of any report on the high-field conduction of these glasses, this work aims to (a) study the negative resistance or switching phenomena for V2O5–Sb–TeO2 glasses to elucidate the effect of different factors such as temperature and electrode distance and also to complete the electrical data reported in [17], (b) study the high-field electrical behavior (Pool–Frenkel effect), (c) verify and certify the electrothermal mechanism of negative resistance phenomena and obtaining the electrical activation energy and heat dissipation factor, and (d) report and explain the compositional dependence of threshold voltage and also lowering factor β PF.

Experimental procedure

For the present samples, details of sample preparation and structural and thermal characterization using XRD, SEM, and DSC have been presented in our recent works [15, 17]. Ternary (60−x)V2O5xSb–40TeO2 glasses, hereafter, are termed as TVSbx. Carefully surface-polished bulk samples were used for electrical measurements; electrical measurements were done with gap-type electrode configuration (see Fig. 2), using a high-voltage power supply (Molian Toos, 0–5 kV, Iran) and sensitive multimeters (TTi, 196, High-resolution computing multimeter, England).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Electrode configuration (gap-type)

For each sample, the I–V characteristic was measured to verify the ohmic properties of the contacts; in other word, ohmic behavior was ascertained from the linearity of I–V curves at low electric field.

Results

Structural features

As reported in our recent works [15, 17], XRD patterns of TVSbx samples confirm their amorphous feature, except for TVSb12 and 15. Up on these reports, XRD pattern of TVSb12 shows some crystalline peaks at 2ϴ ≈ 49.78° and 49.66° (matched with VO2 crystal phase) and also at 2ϴ ≈ 27.44° and 35.2°, which were matched with the vanadium–antimony (SbVO) phase. Besides, the microcrystalline phases have been certified by SEM images [17]. Also, glassy nature, thermal stability, and glass forming tendency of these samples have been reported in our recent work [15].

Electrical behavior

Figures 3 and 4 show the typical I–V curves for TVSb5 at different temperatures and for TVSb10 at different electrode distances. From Fig. 3, one can observe the increase of electrical conduction of all glasses with increasing the temperature, which reveals the semiconducting nature of these samples. Also, during the experiments, influence of Sb content on the I–V characteristics was evident. The obtained results show the increasing of resistivity with increasing of Sb content; this result is in agreement with the results of low-field dc conductivities reported in ref.17. It can be observed that after the ohmic region (linear I–V region), the current–voltage characteristics show increasing deviations from Ohm’s law at electric fields of about >103 V/cm; as discussed later, this behavior can be attributed to Pool–Frenkel effect, which usually occurs at the above-mentioned electric fields. At higher fields, switching (from high to low resistive state) or negative resistance phenomena were observed at a threshold voltage (V th). As is evident from Figs. 3 and 4, the threshold voltage for the onset of switching/negative resistance shows a decreasing trend with increasing in temperature and with decreasing of electrode distance. All V th data, obtained at different temperatures and electrode distances, are presented in Tables 1 and 2. The mentioned electrical behavior is interpreted by an electrothermal model based on the Joule heating effect in the current filament, which proposes the probable formation of crystalline phase in the current filament of amorphous matrix. Details of proposed model and further discussions are presented in “Structural characteristics” section

Fig. 3
figure 3

Current–voltage characteristics of TVSb5 at different temperatures at a fixed electrode distance

Fig. 4
figure 4

Current–voltage characteristics of TVSb10 at different electrodes distances at a fixed temperature

Table 1 The data of threshold voltage (V th) and lowering factor of potential barrier (β PF) at different temperatures, for TVSbx glasses
Table 2 Threshold voltage (V th) at different electrode distances for TVSbx glasses (at room temperature 298 K)

Discussion

Structural characteristics

As have been presented [15, 17] and in Structural features section, the structural changes in samples with x ≥ 12 had distinguished effects on electrical and optical properties [15, 17], and it should be mentioned that may affect on high-field conduction and threshold voltage. It has been reported that the mentioned structural changes and existence of microcrystalline phases in TVSb12 and 15 cause the decreasing trend in electrical activation energy at low electric field experiments [17]. These effects are presented and discussed in continue (see “High electric field properties and electrothermal mechanism for negative resistance behaviour” section).

High electric field properties and electrothermal mechanism for negative resistance behavior

The temperature dependence of the I–V characteristics is an important factor to define a negative resistance (NR)/switching material for technological applications. In this study, the effect of the temperature on the negative resistance/switching behavior has been investigated. Table 1 presents the temperature dependence of the threshold voltage for the present samples. The obtained results reveal that all studied glasses show similar behavior, which can be attributed to the thermal effects during NR/switching.

Also, during the experiments, it was noted that at same condition of temperature and electrode distance, V th increased with increasing of Sb content for 0 ≤ x ≤10 and so decreases for TVSb12 and 15. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) could be used to specify the variation of V th with composition. In all semiconductors, conditions may occur in which the self-generated Joule heat exceeds the capacity of the system to dissipate it. The current increases with temperature, which leads to more Joule self-heating and the consequent thermal runaway. Oxide glassy semiconductors have large negative temperature coefficients of electrical resistivity and low thermal conductivities, so thermal runaway must always be considered as a possible breakdown mechanism in high electric fields. Even if it is not the dominant mechanism which gives rise to the switchingprocess, thermal effects are likely to be present even in thin films and their influence must be understood [7, 19, 23]. It is important to note that no one of the NR/switching models can explain the NR/switching phenomena and the effects of a high electric field on the glasses. If the internal temperature of the samples in the current filament exceeds to glass transition temperature T g, the structural change (crystallization filament in the glassy matrix) is possible. Therefore, the compositional dependence of V th is explainable using the T g data. The DSC data of these glasses [15] show the increasing of T g with increasing in Sb content and then more rigidity of the sample. These data imply to that the structural change is less possible with increasing of Sb content. On the other hand, T g data are not sufficient to explain the V th variations; in other word, nevertheless of regular increasing of T g with Sb content, V th has an increasing trend up to x = 10 mol% and then decreasing trend for x > 10 mol%. Thus, it needs to be clarify using an additive parameter; as reported recently [15], another useful parameter is glass thermal stability (S = T CrT g; T Cr is the crystallization temperature), which defines the stability of glass against thermal shocks and against structural changes. The present glasses have increasing trend in S up to TVSb12, although TVSb12 and 15 have good stability [15]. This result can justify the two variation regions of V th. Also, as can be observed in “Structural characteristics” section, it has been reported that the mentioned structural changes, existence of microcrystalline phases in TVSb12 and 15, and the decreasing trend in glass stability for TVSb12 and 15 cause the decreasing trend in electrical activation energy at low electric field experiments [17]; this result can justify the decrease of V th for x ≥ 12 mol%. These results can be justified from the data of glass forming tendency (K gl). For the present glasses, the data of Kgl have been reported in our recent work [15]; results show an increasing trend of K gl for 0 ≤ x ≤ 12 and then a decreasing trend for 12 ≤ x ≤ 15 [15]; therefore, these reports justify the variation of V th.

Besides temperature, another important factor affecting on the threshold voltage must be the electrode distance (L) [7, 19]. The present study reveals that V th increases with increasing electrode distances for all samples, see Table 2. Although, one cannot specify the real dominant mechanism of NR/switching, but it seems to be more electronic for the electrode distances less than few microns in thin films, and therefore electrothermal for bulk samples. Generally, as presented in the following, we can conclude that NR/switching process in these glasses is on the basis of the electrothermal mechanism.

Generally, the electrical conductivity of non-adiabatic small polaron hopping (NASPH) is thermally activated in the high temperature range and is known by the relation [12, 17]:

$$ \sigma \, = \,(\sigma_{\infty } /T)\,\exp \left[ { - \frac{{E_{\text{a}} }}{kT}} \right], $$
(1)

where k is the Boltzmann constant, σ is the pre-exponential factor (the conductivity at infinite temperature), and E a is the activation energy. To justify the electrothermal mechanism, we can legally assume that the I–V characteristic is principally described by an ohmic dependence V = R(T)I, with T the real temperature of the sample. This temperature dependence on injected electrical power according to the following relation proposed to be

$$ T = T_{0} + \alpha VI, $$
(2)

where α is the heat dissipation factor resulting from thermal conductivity and T 0 is the sample temperature for zero current. Using Eqs. 1 and 2, we have

$$ VI = \frac{{E_{a} }}{{\alpha k\,\ln ({V \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {V {R_{\infty } I)}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {R_{\infty } I)}}}} - \frac{{T_{0} }}{\alpha }, $$
(3)

where R is the electrical resistance of sample at infinite temperature. R values have been deduced from ref. 17. From Eq. 3, it is clear that E a (hereafter termed as E IVa to be distinguished from electrical activation energy obtained from conductivity measurements at low fields E conda [17] ) and α can be determined from the slope and intercept of the linear part of VI versus 1/ln(V/R I) plots. In this work, E IVa and α were determined from the slope and intercept of the linear part of VI versus 1/ln(V/R I) plots. As can be followed from our previous work [17], it should be mentioned that E conda has been obtained from the slope of lnσ-T−1 curves at low electric fields. Using Figs. 3 and 4, typical experimental plots of VI versus 1/ln(V/R I) are shown in Figs. 5 and 6. Obtained values of E IVa and α are listed in Table 3. The values of E IVa are in the same order of E conda values reported in [17]. For the present samples, these low values of E a obtained from low to high field experiments justify the hopping conduction of carriers, not band to band electrical transition (which also can be realized from the comparison of E a values with the data of their optical band gap reported in [15]). The hopping conduction mechanism between localized states has been justified and presented in our previous works [15, 17].

Fig. 5
figure 5

Plots of the electrical power vs. 1/ln(V/RI) for TVSb5 at different temperatures. (Dashed lines show the linear parts, which are used to obtain E IVa and α, and are drawn as a guide for the eye)

Fig. 6
figure 6

Plots of the electrical power vs. 1/ln(V/RI) for TVSb10 at different electrode distances. (Dashed lines show the linear parts, which are used to obtain E IVa and α, and are drawn as a guide for the eye)

Table 3 Values of zero-field temperature (T 0), heat dissipation factor (α) obtained from the intercept of the linear part of VI−1/ln(V/R I) plots, activation energy (E a) obtained from the slope of the linear part of VI−1/ln(V/R I) plots, and sample resistance at infinite temperature (R ), for TVSbx glasses

To justify that the proposed electrothermal model (see Eq. 3) is suitable or not, we also have plotted theoretical (simulated) I–V curves of the samples (using the experimental values of E a , α, and R ∞) in which Fig. 7 shows the typical such plot for TVSb5 sample. Another samples show similar behavior. As shown in Fig. 7, this theoretical curves show the general treatment of NR in our experimental reports; in other word, this model is in good consistency with our experimental results. Also, as indicated in Fig. 7, the temperature in the bulk of samples increase during experiment and help to NR/switching to be occur.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Computer-simulated I–V plots at different T 0 values. ΔT = TT 0 shows temperature increase in the bulk of the samples and is shown typically for TVSb5)

Now, we can further discuss the non-ohmic region of I–V curves (a region before threshold voltage). One can define this region as pre-breakdown region in which thermal effects are not suitably detectable. As mentioned in “Electrical behaviour” section, this region (region of deviation from Ohm’s law) can be discussed to a bulk effect named as Pool–Frenkel effect. In this region, at a given temperature, dc electric field exerted on the sample can lower the potential barrier of carriers in the polaronic conduction (hopping conduction) mechanism and the current (I) obtained as [4.5.10]

$$ I\,\, \propto \,\,\exp \,\left(\frac{{e\,\beta_{PF} \,E^{1/2} }}{KT}\right) $$
(4)

and then

$$ \ln \,(I)\, = const + \,\frac{{e\,\beta_{PF} \,E^{1/2} }}{KT}\,, $$
(5)

where β PF = (e/πk)1/2, k = εε o. β PF , ε, and ε o are the potential barrier lowering factor, high-frequency dielectric constant, and vacuum dielectric constant, correspondingly. An almost linear relation between Tln(I) and E 1/2 is obtained when the electric field is about (103–104)V/cm. In other word, as temperature increases, the electric field required for the onset of non-ohmic behavior is reduced due to the increasing of electrical conduction originated from the semiconducting nature of the samples. Namely, the Pool–Frenkel effect is thermal excitation supported by an external high electric field. In brief, from Fig. 3 for TVSb5 and also for another samples, the lowering factor β PF can be determined from the slope of the linear part of the Tln(I) versus E 1/2 plots. Pool–Frenkel plots are shown typically in Fig. 8 for TVSb5; all obtained values of β PF are listed in Table 1. For each sample, the β PF value increases with increase of temperature, which reveals the thermal effects besides the effect of electric field; therefore, this result justifies the electrothermal model.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Pool–Frenkel plots for TVSb5 at different temperatures (dashed line shows schematically the linear part at 298 K, as a guide for eye)

Conclusion

The NR/switching phenomena of ternary V2O5–Sb–TeO2 glasses have been discussed on the basis of the electrothermal model. Crystallized current filaments, which may be formed between the electrodes in the bulk of samples, cause the electrical conductivity to increase. The glass composition and nature of the glassy matrix mainly control the threshold voltage. Increasing the Sb content of the glass increases the threshold voltage except for TVSb12 and 15. The tendency of crystallization (or in better word, decreasing of glass stability) of these glasses reduces the threshold voltage. The electrothermal model is the most applicable mechanism for the studied glasses.