Introduction

Brown seaweeds are a diverse group of which the main use is human feed and alginate extraction, but also provide a rich resource of bioactive compounds, making them suitable for a wide variety of applications in the food, cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and chemical industries (Chapman and Chapman 1980; McHugh 2003; Jiao et al. 2011; Holdt and Kraan 2011). Despite the promising uses and applications of brown seaweeds, the main difficulty in selecting a species for an industrial process is that the chemical compounds and extracts from seaweed show variations in their yield and properties as the result of adaptive responses to the environmental conditions in which they live (Chapman and Chapman 1980; Lobban and Harrison 1994; Amsler 2008; Holdt and Kraan 2011; Skriptsova et al. 2012). Due to that, for over half a century (Black 1950) efforts have been made in research to describe the behavior of the chemical constituents in several species of seaweed, particularly in species which have a commercial interest, in order to optimize their use and select the best harvesting period (Rodríguez-Montesinos and Hernández-Carmona 1991; Usov et al. 2005; Hernández-Carmona et al. 2009; Holdt and Kraan 2011; Men'shova et al. 2013; Wu et al. 2014; Schiener et al. 2015; Skriptsova 2016).

In Mexico, most of the products derived from brown seaweed are imported and the country ceased its participation in the world market for brown seaweed more than a decade ago. The giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera is the only brown seaweed hand-harvested for local trades, despite there being more species that could be used such as the kelp Eisenia arborea J.E. Areschoug (DOF 2012; Hernández-Carmona et al. 2012). Species of Eisenia are appreciated in Asian coastal areas for their use in human food and folk medicine and as a raw material for alginates, fucoidan, and several metabolites with interesting bioactivity, i.e., antioxidant, antitumoral, anti-inflammatory, and antiallergic (Sugiura et al. 2006, 2013; Ermakova et al. 2013; Men'shova et al. 2013; Shibata et al. 2015).

On the Mexican Pacific coast, E. arborea is commercially harvested in small amounts (26 wet tonnes per year) (Enrique Hernández, CRIP-Ensenada, personal communication), despite that it has been described as a potential food for animals including humans (Serviere-Zaragoza et al. 2002, 2003; Hernández-Carmona et al. 2009; Zertuche-González et al. 2014), as a raw material for alginates (Hernández-Carmona 1985; Arvizu et al. 2007; Murillo-Álvarez and Hernández-Carmona 2007), as a potential source of fucoidan (Muñoz-Ochoa et al. 2009), and as an alternative to feed abalone (Zertuche-González et al. 2014). Variations have been reported for proximate chemical composition and alginates, with remarkable geographical difference that pointed out that changes do not occur both between seasons and between structures at the southern limit of the species (Hernández-Carmona 1985; Serviere-Zaragoza et al. 2002; Arvizu et al. 2007; Hernández-Carmona et al. 2009). However, the variation of other extracts with commercial interest such as fucoidan or crude extracts is unknown.

We hypothesized that the chemical composition, biological activity, and properties of extracts from E. arborea do not change significantly over time and the changes do not depend on sampling frequency. Therefore, our objective was to describe the bimonthly variation in the proximate chemical composition, yield of alginate, fucoidan and ethanolic extract, the anticoagulant and antioxidant activity of the extracts, and quality of the properties of alginates, separately from blades and stipes from E. arborea collected in Bahía Magdalena (BM), Baja California Sur, Mexico. This information is important to develop a management plan for the species, including the best harvesting time and the potential uses of the algae.

Materials and methods

Eisenia arborea samples were collected at BM (Punta Arenas), Baja California Sur, Mexico (24° 16′ N and 25° 45′ N and 111° 20′ W and 112° 18′ W) (Fig. 1) by semiautonomous Hookah diving equipment, at 5–6 m depth, every 2 months, from September 2013 to July 2014. A minimum of 30 individuals were randomly selected and cut with a knife from the base of the stipes. Algae were divided into blades and stipes, sun-dried, and stored in plastic bags at room temperature. The algae were ground in a Pulvex 200 miller (Maquinaria Pulvex SA de CV, Mexico) to 30 mesh particle size.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Collecting site of Eisenia arborea in Punta Arenas, in Bahía Magdalena, BCS, Mexico

Sea superficial temperature was estimated through satellite images obtained from the Group for High Resolution of Sea Surface Temperature (www.GHRSST.org). Images are at 1 day/1 km spatial resolution. We reported only the means and used the information to divide the sampling time into temperature periods.

Proximate chemical composition

The proximate chemical analyses (moisture, ash, crude fiber, proteins, total lipids, and carbohydrates) were carried out according to the AOAC (1995). Moisture was quantified by weight difference at 105 °C for 4 h, ash by calcination at 600 °C for 5 h, protein by the Dumas method with LECO FP-528 Equipment (USA), crude fiber by the successive hydrolysis method (acid/base), total lipids by a Soxtec Avanti 2050 Tecator (Foss Analytical AB, Sweden), and carbohydrates by calculating the difference: 100 − (% proteins + % lipids + % crude fiber + % ash).

Crude ethanolic extracts and antioxidant activity

Samples of blades (300 g) and stipes (80 g) were extracted with 96% ethanol for 9 days, and replacement of the solvent every third day. The ethanolic solutions obtained were concentrated to dryness using a rotary evaporator (Yamato E-500) under reduced pressure at 40 °C. Ethanolic extract yield was calculated based on the dry weight of the algae. After extraction, the residual algae were dried at 30 °C for 12 h for the next aqueous extraction. For the antioxidant activity assay, the extracts were dissolved in ethanol at concentrations of 200, 100, 50 and 25 μg mL−1. The antioxidant activity was measured in terms of radical scavenging, using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) method (Goupy et al. 1999). Activity was measured in test tubes, adding 1 mL of sample and 4 mL of the DPPH solution at 0.02%. Then, the mixed solution was stored in the dark for 30 min; finally, absorbance was measured on a spectrophotometer at 517 nm.

The scavenging effect was calculated using the following equation:

$$ \%\mathrm{DPPH}\ \mathrm{reduction}=\frac{\mathrm{Abs}\ \mathrm{control}-\mathrm{Abs}\ \mathrm{sample}}{\mathrm{Abs}\ \mathrm{control}}100 $$

EC50 was calculated by the linear correlation graphical method, using ascorbic acid as a positive control.

Fucoidan: yield, anticoagulant activity, and characterization

A sample of 20 g of the algae previously extracted with ethanol was used for crude fucoidan extraction, according to Muñoz-Ochoa et al. (2009). The dried algae were extracted in distilled water (1 : 10 ratio, w/v) at 55 °C under continuous agitation for 2 h. The liquid was filtered and the process was repeated twice. The supernatant was clarified by centrifugation. A solution of 10% CaCl2 was added (1 : 1 ratio, v/v) and left for 24 h under refrigeration to promote precipitation of calcium alginates. The precipitate was separated by centrifugation, and the supernatant was mixed with distilled ethanol (1 : 3) and left to stand for 16 h to promote fucoidan precipitation. The precipitate was recovered by centrifugation and dried at 50 °C for 16 h. Fucoidan yield was calculated based on the initial dried weight of the algae.

The anticoagulant activity of each extract was assessed by prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) assays. Both assays were carried out with human plasma treated with sodium citrate and a stock solution of 10 mg mL−1 of each sample. Each assay was performed by mixing 90 μL of human plasma with 10 μL of the extract in distilled water. The reagents were added according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Siemens Healthcare, Germany). The clot formation time was determined by visual inspection and reported in seconds. For samples that exceeded a coagulation time of 300 s, dose–response curves were performed at concentrations of 10, 5, 2.5, 1.25 and 0.625 mg mL−1 to determine the lowest concentration that doubled the control coagulation time (PT = 13 s; aPTT = 27 s) in each assay.

The crude fucoidan content was characterized partially by infrared (IR) spectroscopy. The spectra were recorded with a PerkinElmer Two with total reflectance attenuator (ATR) (USA). IR spectra were obtained after 28 scans with a resolution of 4 cm−1 in a range of 500–4000 cm−1. Total sugar and fucose content in the fucoidan extract was estimated by colorimetric assays according to Dubois et al. (1956) and Dische (1955).

Alginates: yield, properties, and characterization

The wet algae previously used to extract the crude fucoidan were used for alginate extraction following the method of Arvizu-Higuera et al. (2002). Briefly, wet tissue was put in 180 mL of a 0.1% formaldehyde solution for 16 h. Then, the formaldehyde solution was filtrated and a pre-acid extraction was carried out in 300 mL of distilled water and the pH was adjusted to 4 with 1 N hydrochloric acid (HCl) maintaining continuous stirring for 15 min. The algae were recovered by filtration and put in distilled water in a 1 : 25 ratio (w/v) and transferred to a water bath at 80 °C for 2 h with continuous stirring, and the pH was adjusted to 10 with sodium carbonate solution (10%). The solution was clarified by vacuum filtration with diatomaceous earth. Finally, the alginate was precipitated with ethanol at 96% in a 1 : 1 ratio (v/v). The fibers were recovered and dried for 12 h in an oven at 55 °C. Alginate yield was calculated based on the dry weight of the algae before being used for fucoidan extraction.

Viscosity was measured in 1% alginate solution at 22 °C using a Brookfield LTV viscometer (Brookfield, USA) (Hernández-Carmona et al. 1999). Color was estimated in 1% alginate solution, and transmittance was measured at 510 nm according to Hernández-Carmona et al. (1999). Gel strength was measured on calcium alginate gels using a TA.XTPlus texture analyzer (Stable Micro Systems, UK) according to Camacho and Hernández-Carmona (2012). The alginate IR spectrum was recorded in the same conditions as for fucoidan.

The mannuronic/guluronic acid (M/G) ratio was estimated semiquantitatively through the relationship between the absorption bands at 1125 and 1029 cm−1, from the alginate IR spectrum (Filippov and Kohn 1974).

Statistical analyses

All analysis was carried out in triplicate, except anticoagulant activity which was done in duplicate. Data were normal (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, R Project 3.01). Significant differences between alga structures (blades or stipes) and between sampling times (months) and the yield of each component were determined using a multifactorial analysis of variance (MANOVA) test. Statistically significant interactions were analyzed using the Tukey post hoc test (Statgraphics Centurion XVII).

Results

Sea surface temperature ranged from 19 to 27 °C at the sampling site. Two periods are distinguished from the data obtained in BM, the warm period (between 23 and 26 °C), from June to November, and the cold period (between 19 and 22 °C), from December to May.

Proximate chemical composition

All constituents showed a significant difference between blades and stipes (p < 0.05) and between months (p < 0.05). The most abundant constituents of blades and stipes from E. arborea were ash and carbohydrates (Table 1). Moisture was less than 13% in all samples. Blades showed a higher content of ash (33.7%) and lipids (0.25%) in January, carbohydrates (55%) and crude fiber (5.6%) in July, and proteins (12.5%) in May. The stipes showed the highest content of ash in March (37.4%), carbohydrates (49.7%) and proteins (10.2%) in May, crude fiber (9.9%) in November, and lipids (0.03%) in July.

Table 1 Proximate chemical composition (% dry weight) of blades and stipes from Eisenia arborea

Yield of crude extracts and antioxidant activity

The ethanolic crude extract yield showed a significant variation (p < 0.05) between structures and months (Table 2). The yield and antioxidant activity were higher in blades than in stipes (p < 0.05). In blades, the highest yield and antioxidant activity were obtained in September (5.4%) and November (EC50 = 55 μg mL−1). Stipes showed the highest yield (2.07%) and antioxidant activity (EC50 = 352 μg mL−1) in May.

Table 2 Yield and properties of ethanolic extract, fucoidan, and alginate from Eisenia arborea

Fucoidan: yield, anticoagulant activity, and characterization

The fucoidan yield range was 7.8–20% for blades and 3.7–8.7% for stipes, with a significant difference between structures (Table 2). Only blades showed a significance difference between months. The highest yield in the blades was 20.6 ± 0.5% (September), while in stipes it was 7.8 ± 0.5% (March). All fucoidan samples analyzed by the PT and aPTT assays had high anticoagulant activity (>300 s) at a concentration of 10 mg mL−1. The samples from January (blades) and May (stipes) were the most active because they doubled the control time of the lowest concentration tested in the aPTT assay. The highest activity was observed in January for blades and May for stipes. For the PT assay, only samples from September to March were analyzed. The most active samples of fucoidan were from November (blades) and March (stipes) at 0.625 mg mL−1.

The fucoidan content of total sugars and fucose was significantly different between months (p < 0.05) and structures (p < 0.05) (Table 2). Fucoidan from blades had a higher content of total sugars and fucose than fucoidan from stipes. The IR spectrum showed the typical absorption bands for fucoidan, consistent with the pattern of bands of the fucoidan standard obtained from Fucus vesiculosus (F5631, Sigma). Absorption bands in the range 1680–1600 cm−1 show the presence of uronic acids. The bands at 1260–1200 cm−1 are attributed to vibrations of the S=O bond of the sulfate group; the presence of sulfates is corroborated with the band around 580 cm−1. The bands at 1100–1000 cm−1 correspond to hemiacetal rings, and those at 850–820 cm−1 are attributed to the substitutions of sulfate groups at the C2 or C3 and C4 positions of fucose residues (Fig. 2). These bands were consistent in both structures (blades and stipes) and were similar for samples of all months.

Fig. 2
figure 2

FTIR-ATR spectra of fucoidan and alginate from blades (B) and stipes (S) from Eisenia arborea and their standards

Alginates: yield, properties, and characterization

Alginate yield showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) between months and structures (Table 2). In November, January, and March, we obtained the highest yields in both blades (21.3, 21, and 18.5%) and stipes (21.2, 24.5, and 21.8%).

Viscosity and gel strength also showed a difference between months and structures (p < 0.05) (Table 2). Mean annual viscosity from stipes (538 mPa s−1) was twice as high as viscosity from blades (252 mPa s−1). Alginate viscosity from stipes ranged from 440 to 1009 mPa s−1, while from blades it was 140–464 mPa s−1. Alginate gel strength ranged from 1754 to 3239 g cm−2 for blades and 2503–3335 g cm−2 for stipes (Table 2). The highest viscosity and gel strength were obtained in January for blades (464 mPa s−1 and 3239 g cm−2) and stipes (1008 mPa s−1 and 3336 g cm−2). Alginate color was in the range 21–72 for transmittance at 510 nm for blades and 55–85 for stipes. Alginates were dark brown to amber in blades and amber in stipes.

The IR spectrum (Fig. 2) showed typical absorption bands for alginates at 950, 885–890, and 816 cm−1. Absorption bands corresponding to vibration of hemiacetal links from mannuronic and guluronic acid residues were observed at 1120 and 1027 cm−1, respectively. A proportion of these monosaccharides is shown in Table 2. Alginates from both blades and stipes showed an M/G ratio <1, meaning that both alginates had a higher proportion of guluronic acid in the chemical structures, and this was consistent in all samples.

Discussion

Proximate chemical composition

Carbohydrate content ranged from 44 to 46%, which is consistent with ranges reported for other brown seaweeds and for E. arborea (Chapman and Chapman 1980; Serviere-Zaragoza et al. 2002; Hernández-Carmona et al. 2009). This carbohydrate content is suitable to consider the species a resource for biofuel (van Hal et al. 2014). The high carbohydrate content in both structures is related to the large amount of polysaccharides in brown algae (Chapman and Chapman 1980; Lobban and Harrison 1994). In seaweeds, carbohydrate synthesis may be affected by high temperatures, the maximum growth period, and the increase of photosynthetic activity (Munda and Kremer 1977; Lobban and Harrison 1994; Marinho-Soriano et al. 2006; Gómez and Houvinen 2012) which prevails in BM in the warm period (Cervantes-Duarte et al. 2007; Zaitsev et al. 2014).

Ash content was similar to previous reports and confirmed the highest content in stipes (Arvizu et al. 2007; Hernández-Carmona et al. 2009). Ash content was also similar to other commercial species such as Undaria, Fucus, Ascophyllum, Costaria costata, and Macrocystis pyrifera (Carrillo-Domínguez et al. 2002; Holdt and Kraan 2011; Wu et al. 2014). Some authors have suggested that when salinity decreases in the sea, the ash content in algae also decreases (Kumar et al. 2015), but we observed the highest proportion of ash in January and March, which are months with low salinity in BM (Cervantes-Duarte et al. 2007, 2010; Zaitsev et al. 2014). Hence, it may indicate that the reduction of salinity is not indicative of the lower ash content found in E. arborea. This could be because some ash is made up of elements such as calcium, sodium, and potassium, which are linked with other constituents such as alginic acid (Kloareg and Quatrano 1988; Kraemer and Chapman 1991), and could have no relation to changes in salinity.

Protein content for both structures was similar to other brown algae, such as M. pyrifera (5–12%), Sargassum wightii (8–12%), Laminaria digitata (8–15%), and Ascophyllum nodosum (3–15%) (Rodríguez-Montesinos and Hernández-Carmona 1991; Fleurence 2004; Kumar et al. 2015). A higher proportion of protein was observed during the cold season (spring), when nitrate has higher bioavailability (Cervantes-Duarte et al. 2007, 2010). A positive correlation between nitrogen content and proteins in seaweed has been found in species such as Gracilaria cervicornis and Sargassum vulgare (Marinho-Soriano et al. 2006). During spring, E. arborea stores a high nitrogen content in its tissues (Hernández-Carmona et al. 2001), and that may have a relation to the higher level of protein synthesis in this season.

The moisture content of all samples indicated that E. arborea was properly dried and could be stored for a long time without decomposition (Arvizu et al. 2007).

Crude fiber content is low in algae. Despite that, they can be used as a food supplement since they help promote peristaltic movements and a reduction of intestinal transit time, and may reduce hypocholesterolemic and hypoglycemic effects (Gómez-Ordoñez et al. 2010). Eisenia arborea may have a high nutritional value because it contains important fatty acids such as omega 6 and 2 fatty acids (Hernández-Carmona et al. 2009).

Crude extracts and antioxidant activity

Ethanol is a solvent used for the extraction of polar compounds (Sarker et al. 2006); the high yields of crude extract in blades could be due to the presence of polar compounds in this part of the alga. The antioxidant activity may be due to the presence of major compounds that have that activity such as fucoxanthins, carotenoids, tocopherols, amino acids, polyphenols, terpenes, and flavonoids (Alstyne et al. 1999; Sugiura et al. 2006; Amsler 2008). With respect to antioxidant activity, the mean EC50 from blades (99.45 μg mL−1) was lower than that of other species of kelp such as Undaria sp. (420 μg mL−1) and Laminaria sp. (860 μg mL−1) (Ismail and Hong 2002), but the mean EC50 from stipes was higher (436.78 μg mL−1). This suggests that blades could be used to obtain antioxidant extracts or to find metabolites such as phlorotannins which have shown biological activity in species of Eisenia (Sugiura et al. 2006, 2013; Shibata et al. 2015).

Blades showed higher yield and antioxidant activity during the warm period, when the conditions in BM are characterized by high temperatures, low nutrient concentrations, and high irradiance (Cervantes-Duarte et al. 2007; Zaitsev et al. 2014). Most compounds which have antioxidant activity are molecules that protect the seaweeds against UV radiation, high oxygen concentrations, and pathogenic and epiphytic organisms (Amsler 2008). Therefore, the higher activity and yields in blades could be related to higher exposure to those harmful agents occurring during the warm period in BM and prevailing during the year (Zaitsev et al. 2014). However, it is necessary to conduct specific sampling to study more about this topic.

Fucoidan: yield, anticoagulant activity, and characterization

The fucoidan yield in E. arborea was in the same range as other commercial species such as F. vesiculosus (3.4–25.7%), Eisenia bicyclis (1.3, 1.4, and 3.1%), Saccharina japonica (3–25 and 0.87–4.26%), and Alaria fistulosa (2.9–14.5%) (Usui et al. 1980; Rupérez et al. 2002; Usov et al. 2005; Skriptsova et al. 2012; Ermakova et al. 2013; Men'shova et al. 2013; Skriptsova 2016).

The highest fucoidan yield in blades can be explained by the content of carbohydrates, because they are generally found in a higher proportion in the distal parts of seaweeds, from where they are translocated to meristematic zones (Küppers and Kremer 1978; Gómez and Houvinen 2012). In E. arborea, the distal parts are the blades and the meristematic zone is at the base of the blades (Setchell 1905). Nonetheless, the reproduction period of brown seaweeds is correlated with higher fucoidan content (Skriptsova et al. 2012; Skriptsova 2016). Although E. arborea is a perennial species, the maximum reproduction period is from July to November (McPeak 1981), which corresponds to the highest fucoidan content in blades during the sampling period.

Moreover, it was described that one of the functions of fucoidan in seaweeds is structural and the flow of water can influence the seasonal variation, especially with higher flow intensities (Kloareg and Quatrano 1988; Kraemer and Chapman 1991). This suggests that the singular fucoidan peak obtained in March may be related to the increased water flow in BM due to upwelling activity (Zaitsev et al. 2014).

The IR spectra of fucoidan from blades and stipes showed bands at 1606, 1620, and 1420 cm−1 attributable to carboxyl groups; bands at 1030 and 1089 cm−1 corresponding to the vibrations of hemiacetal links of sugar rings; bands at 1224, 1205, 1250, and 1220 cm−1 typically attributable to the vibration of sulfate ester groups; and bands at 820 and 824 cm−1 corresponding to vibrations of equatorial sulfate groups with a substitution pattern of fucose mainly at C4, with minor substitution at C3 and C2. The bands at 847 and 849 cm−1 are typical of axial sulfate groups, which is the pattern distribution in C2 or C3 of the fucose ring (Muñoz-Ochoa et al. 2009; Pereira et al. 2003; Seedevi et al. 2013; Shanthi et al. 2014). In all samples, the intensity bands of IR spectra for stipes were lower than in blades. This means that the fucoidan constituents of stipes were present in a lower proportion than in blades, which could be confirmed by quantitative determination of sugars and fucose, which were in present in a lower proportion during all months. Data for fucan absorption bands reported in the literature indicate that the bands around 840–845 cm−1 are typical of axial sulfate groups at position O4 of the fucose residue and a shoulder around 830–820 cm−1 corresponds to sulfate groups in the equatorial position of the C2 and C3 of fucose residues (Patankar et al. 1993; Chizhov et al. 1999; Marais and Joseleau 2001).

The anticoagulant activity of fucoidan extracts exceeded the blank 11-fold in the aPTT assay and 23-fold in the PT assay, throughout the sampling period and in both structures. This suggests that fucoidan from E. arborea could be used as an anticoagulant in extrinsic and intrinsic ways, and it could be obtained from seaweeds collected at any time of the year since high anticoagulant activity showed no pattern associated with its fucose content or total sugar content. It is possible that other factors such as sulfate content or molecular weight could explain the anticoagulant activity variation (Jiao et al. 2011) and should be studied for E. arborea.

In addition, it is important to describe more fully the bioactivity of fucoidan, since it has a wide variety of bioactivity such as antioxidant, antitumoral, and antiviral, which has been described in its congenial E. bicyclis (Jiao et al. 2011; Ermakova et al. 2013). In order to optimize their use, due to the high yield of fucoidan in blades, we suggest using this part of the algae as the main source to obtain it.

Alginates: yield, properties, and characterization

The variation in alginate yield from blades and stipes from E. arborea in BM is a novel discovery, because no significant variation has been reported before. Hernández-Carmona (1985) found no significant yield variation (2.8%), and Arvizu et al. (2007) found an even lower variation (0.09%). In this research, alginate yield varied in the order of 5% for blades and 13% for stipes. This suggests that studies with a low sample frequency may not show seasonal variations, and are inappropriate for selecting harvesting seasons for the algae.

In general, alginates from E. arborea showed low yields in comparison with other commercial species (Table 3) such as L. digitata (blades 51.8%, stipes 44.01 and 34.6%), L. hyperborea (33.2%), Alaria esculenta (37.4%), Saccharina latissima (28.5%), S. japonica (43%), and Undaria pinnatifida (51%) (Skriptsova et al. 2004, 2012; Men'shova et al. 2013; Fertah et al. 2014; Schiener et al. 2015). However, it was in the range of its congenial E. bicyclis (15.8%) (Men'shova et al. 2013). Nonetheless, it is an important marine resource along Mexican coasts, because according to our yield results only 5 kg of dry algae is necessary to obtain 1 kg of alginate.

Table 3 Yields of fucoidan and alginate and alginate viscosity from Eisenia arborea collected in Punta Arenas, Baja California Sur, Mexico, compared with others species

Alginate color is attributable to the presence of phenolic compounds, which can be fixed with a formaldehyde solution (Hernández-Carmona et al. 1999). Because the samples came from a continuous extraction process, some of these compounds were also extracted and may explain the light coloration in alginates. The advantage of a continuous extraction process to produce different compounds is that fewer chemicals are used; for example, chlorine treatment to bleach alginates would not be necessary at an industrial level and the viscosity reduction could be avoided (Hernández-Carmona et al. 1999).

Alginate viscosity from blades (140–464 mPa s−1) and stipes (315–1009 mPa s−1) was lower than the viscosity previously reported by Arvizu et al. (2007) in both blades (1270–2210 mPa s−1) and stipes (793–1260 mPa s−1). Blade viscosity is classified as low-medium and stipe viscosity as medium-high (Reyes-Tisnado et al. 2000). So, alginates from blades may be used as an additive for textile printing on high-speed rollers (McHugh 2003), while stipe alginates may be used as an additive for thickeners, syrup preparation, and ice cream toppings (McHugh 1987).

There are few reports about alginate gel strength, and this is the first report specifically for E. arborea. The gel strength in blades (1755–3122 g cm−2) and stipes (2504–3516 g cm−2) was higher than the gel strength in many species, such as C. costata (980–1449 g cm−2) (Wu et al. 2014) and Sargassum cymosum (709 g cm−2) (Camacho and Hernández-Carmona 2012). According to Filippov and Kohn (1974), an M/G ratio <1 confirms a higher proportion of guluronic blocks than mannuronic blocks. The results are consistent with the premise that alginates with higher gel strength have a higher proportion of guluronic acid than mannuronic acid (Usov et al. 2005). Both alginates are suitable for use in cell encapsulation in biomedical and environmental applications (Reyes-Tisnado et al. 2000).

If the main interest is to produce alginates, we suggest algae harvesting from January to March. Although E. arborea is a perennial species, collection in this period would not affect the reproduction season, which is from July to November (McPeak 1981).

In conclusion, E. arborea shows changes in its chemical composition between seasons and structures in BM. These variations are detected only with high-frequency sampling (at least bimonthly). Blades can be considered for use as forage and human food, because they are rich in energy (carbohydrates) and minerals, with a low fat content. In addition, blades contain molecules with antioxidant activity, which give them added nutritional value. E. arborea stipes are a suitable resource for obtaining alginates that may compete in the market of food and pharmaceutical additives, and also have environmental and industrial applications. If alginates are the main interest to exploit this species, we recommend using both structures of the algae (blades and stipes). If the interest is food and bioactive molecules, we suggest using only blades, carrying out the harvest above the meristematic zone, as proposed by Mexican regulations (DOF 2012).

The best period to harvest E. arborea in BM is from September to March, in order to take advantage of the better properties of their compounds. According to our results, E. arborea is a potential resource to be exploited; however, it is important to quantify the available biomass and describe the impacts that resource extraction could represent to the ecosystem. We suggest assessing the harvesting methods and starting small-scale production at a pilot plant in order to begin commercializing the species.