Abstract
This study considers tertiary calculus students’ and instructors’ conceptualizations of slope. Qualitative techniques were employed to classify responses to 5 items using conceptualizations of slope identified across various research settings. Students’ responses suggest that they rely on procedurally based conceptualizations of slope, showing little evidence of covariational reasoning. In contrast, instructors’ responses demonstrated a multi-dimensional understanding of slope as a functional property, which applies to real-world situations and plays an integral role in the development of key calculus concepts. While relatively diverse, the instructors’ responses seldom reported determining increasing or decreasing trends of a line from its slope. This conceptualization was used frequently by students and could help them better understand how slope ties to positive and negative derivatives. The most frequently used conceptualizations for students in this study align with past research findings on the emphasis of the secondary mathematics curriculum, supporting the possibility of cultural influences (academic and geographic) on individuals’ conceptualizations of slope. Thus, this study provides valuable insight into conceptualizations of slope and provides direction for future research on slope and the broader topic of cultural influences on mathematical meaning.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall.
Ball, D. L. & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 83–104). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Barr, G. (1981). Student ideas on the concept of gradient. Mathematics in School, 10, 16–17.
Barton, B., Clark, M. & Sheryn, L. (2010). Collective dreaming: A school–university interface. New Zealand Journal of Mathematics, 40, 15–31.
Bishop, A. J. (1994). Cultural conflicts in mathematics education: Developing a research agenda. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(2), 15–18.
Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S. & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 352–378.
Carlson, M., Oehrtman, M. & Engelke, N. (2010). The precalculus concept assessment: A tool for assessing students’ reasoning abilities and understandings. Cognition and Instruction, 28, 113–145.
Civil, M. (2002). Everyday mathematics, mathematicians’ mathematics, and school mathematics: Can we bring them together? In M. Brenner & J. Moschkovich (Eds.), Everyday and academic mathematics in the classroom. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education Monograph #11 (pp. 40–62). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Clark, M. & Lovric, M. (2009). Understanding secondary–tertiary transition in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(6), 755–776.
Confrey, J. & Smith, E. (1995). Splitting, covariation, and their role in the development of exponential functions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 66–86.
Coe, E. (2007). Modeling teachers’ ways of thinking about rate of change. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ.
Ebersbach, M., Van Dooren, W., Goudriaan, M. N. & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Discriminating non-linearity from linearity: Its cognitive foundations in five-year-olds. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12, 14–19.
Ellis, A. B. & Grinstead, P. (2008). Hidden lessons: How a focus on slope-like properties of quadratic functions encouraged unexpected generalizations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27, 277–296.
Gerdes, P. (1988). On culture, geometrical thinking and mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19, 137–162.
Hattikudur, S., Prather, R. W., Asquith, P., Knuth, E., Nathan, M. J. & Alibali, M. W. (2011). Constructing graphical representations: Middle schoolers’ developing knowledge about slope and intercept. School Science and Mathematics, 112(4), 230–240.
Hauger, G.S. (1998). High school and college students’ knowledge of rate of change (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (9909315).
Johnson, H. (2011). Secondary students’ quantification of variation in rate of change. In L. R. Weist & T. Lamberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Reno, NV: University of Nevada, Reno.
Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
Lobato, J. & Siebert, D. (2002). Quantitative reasoning in a reconceived view of transfer. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 87–116.
Lobato, J. & Thanheiser, E. (2002). Developing understanding of ratio-as-measure as a foundation of slope. In B. Litwiller & G. Bright (Eds.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions (pp. 162–175). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Moore-Russo, D., Conner, A., & Rugg, K. I. (2011). Can slope be negative in 3-space? Studying concept image of slope through collective definition construction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(1), 3–21.
Mudaly, V. & Moore-Russo, D. (2011). South African teachers’ conceptualisations of gradient: A study of historically disadvantaged teachers in an advanced certificate in education programme. Pythagoras, 32(1), 27–33.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Noble, T., Nemirovsky, R., Wright, T. & Tierney, C. (2001). Experiencing change: The mathematics of change in multiple environments. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 85–108.
Orton, A. (1984). Understanding rate of change. Mathematics in School, 5, 23–26.
Planinic, M., Milin-Sipus, Z., Katic, H., Susac, A. & Ivanjek, L. (2012). Comparison of student understanding of line graph slope in physics and mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1393–1414.
Prediger, S. (2004). Intercultural perspectives on mathematics learning—developing a research agenda. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 377–406.
Selden, A. (2005). New developments and trends in tertiary mathematics education: Or, more of the same? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36, 131–147.
Stanton, M., & Moore‐Russo, D. (2012). Conceptualizations of slope: A look at state standards. School Science and Mathematics, 112(5), 270–277.
Stroup, W. (2002). Understanding qualitative calculus: A structural synthesis of learning research. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7, 167–215.
Stump, S. (1999). Secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge of slope. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 11, 124–144.
Stump, S. (2001a). Developing preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of slope. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20, 207–227.
Stump, S. (2001b). High school precalculus students’ understanding of slope as measure. School Science and Mathematics, 101, 81–89.
Tall, D. (2008). The transition to formal thinking in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 5–24.
Tall, D. & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151–169.
Thompson, P. W. (1994). The development of the concept of speed and its relationship to concepts of rate. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 179–234). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Teuscher, D. & Reys, R. (2010). Slope, rate of change, and steepness: Do students understand these concepts? Mathematics Teacher, 103, 519–524.
Voight, J. (1994). Negotiation of mathematical meaning and learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 275–298.
Yackel, E. & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477.
Zaslavsky, O., Sela, H. & Leron, U. (2002). Being sloppy about slope: The effect of changing the scale. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 119–140.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nagle, C., Moore-Russo, D., Viglietti, J. et al. CALCULUS STUDENTS’ AND INSTRUCTORS’ CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF SLOPE: A COMPARISON ACROSS ACADEMIC LEVELS. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 11, 1491–1515 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9411-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9411-2