Abstract
The conservation of orchids is challenging due to their strong biotic relations and tiny seeds, requiring mycorrhiza for germination. This is aggravated when tropical plants are maintained in artificial conditions of greenhouses. We aimed to select the plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) for orchid seed germination, to study plant–microbial interactions, and to determine whether there is any specificity between two species of Dendrobium plants in choosing bacterial partners. By the isolation of rhizoplane and endophytic rhizobacteria from Dendrobium moschatum roots, the known PGPR (Azospirillum, Enterobacter, Streptomyces) and less popular (Roseomonas, Agrococcus) strains were tested for the production of biologically active auxin. The bacterization of another orchid, D. noblie, with several newly selected strains and previously isolated ones (Mycobacterium sp., Bacillus pumilus) revealed that the orchids did not express evident specificity in relations with favorable bacteria, but refused to establish associations with Streptomyces and Azospirillum. Endophytic Agrococcus and Sphingomonas strains showed significant promotion of orchid germination. Mycobacterium and B. pumilus were also stable in their positive influence on the acceleration of D. noblie seed development. The active colonization of the seed surface and the inner tissues by associated bacteria was observed under electron microscopy. The analysis of orchid–bacteria relations was made. Altogether, the data shows that selection provides a good strategy for choosing the active strains for orchid seeds’ bacterization, since not all known PGPR are useful and successful in building associative frameworks with orchid seeds. The stable activity of the strains guarantees their long-term and effective application in orchid in vitro biotechnology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The genus Dendrobium is one of the largest genera of the Orchidaceae Juss. family. Although orchid seeds are produced in thousands and millions per one seed capsule, they are the smallest by size (0.05–6 mm) or weight (0.31–24 μg) among the seed-bearing plants (Roberts and Dixon 2008), they have no endosperm, and they only germinate in symbiosis with an appropriate fungus (Smith and Read 2008). A symbiotic in vitro orchid germination requires complex nutrient media supplemented with various substances, vitamins and plant growth stimulators (Teixeira da Silva et al. 2015). The stable relations between the host-plant and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are determined due to nitrogen fixation, production of antimicrobials and plant growth regulators, solubilization of minerals, and such bacterial activities as lowering the ethylene level in plants or enhancing plant resistance under diverse abiotic stress conditions (Ryan et al. 2008; Saharan and Nehra 2011; Ahemad and Kibret 2014; Passari et al. 2015). A number of PGPR capable of auxin (indole-3-acetic acid, IAA) production has been reported among different species of bacteria (Khalid et al. 2004; Tsavkelova et al. 2006; Spaepen et al. 2007; Ryan et al. 2008; Ahemad and Kibret 2014; Habibi et al. 2014).
Previously we showed the differences in bacterial communities colonizing the aerial and substrate roots of several epiphytic and terrestrial greenhouse and wild grown orchids (Tsavkelova et al. 2004, 2007a; reviewed in Teixeira da Silva et al. 2015). The first mention of the orchid–bacteria interactions was made by Knudson (1922). Wilkinson et al. (1989, 1994) showed that mycorrhizal fungus co-inoculated with Pseudomonas and Bacillus strains promoted the germination of the terrestrial Pterostylis vittata seeds. We showed the formation of microbial consortia consisting of fungi, heterotrophic bacteria and cyanobacteria on the roots of epiphytic orchids as well as the capacity of pure bacterial cultures to promote orchid seed germination (Tsavkelova et al. 2007b).
Nowadays, the interest in this subject is rising due to investigation of orchid-associated bacteria from tropical (Galdiano Júnior et al. 2011; Faria et al. 2013; Yang et al. 2014) and temperate regions (Shekhovtsova et al. 2013). Faria et al. (2013) showed that several Paenibacillus strains promoted the development and growth of Cattleya loddigesii Lindl. seedlings. The strains of Bacillus sp. and Enterobacter sp. improved acclimatization and plantlet survival of Cattleya walkeriana Gardn. (Galdiano Júnior et al. 2011). While the above-mentioned studies described the treatment of already germinated plantlets, we focused on the role of rhizobacteria in the first phases of seed germination. There is much data on the successful application of diverse beneficial microbial strains promoting growth of different crop plants (e.g. reviewed in Tsavkelova et al. 2006; Ahemad and Kibret 2014). However, the specificity of the orchid biology restricts the number of possible PGPR strains that can be used in orchid–microbial biotechnology. Moreover, orchid seed germination is a long term process, and it requires selective strategies for choosing the optimal species and the strains of bacteria.
In this study, our purpose was to study whether there is any specificity between two Dendrobium species in choosing their bacterial partners among several previously (Tsavkelova et al. 2007b) and newly (endophytes) isolated strains. Bacteria isolated from the roots of the Dendrobium moschatum (Buch.–Ham.) Swartz were taken for seed bacterization of another Dendrobium, D. nobile Lindl. Together with the search for potentially rarely used PGPR, we aimed to test the strains, usually recognized as PGPR of the crop plants, for their capacity in orchid seed germination. In order to examine the direct influence of orchid-associated bacteria on acceleration of seed development, we analyzed the strains for the production of indole-3-acetic acid under supplementation of different sources of exogenous tryptophan as a potential inducer of microbial auxin biosynthesis. We also wanted to show the stability of selected strains in their long-termed application for orchid germination and thus, plant conservation. To estimate if the beneficial bacteria establish the endophytic lifestyle, their preferred localization when interacting with the seeds and nascent sprouts was examined by electron microscopy.
Materials and methods
Sampling of the roots and isolation of orchid-associated bacteria
For the selection of bacteria that might be used for orchid seed bacterization technique, the cultivable microbial cultures can only be used. Thus, all of the investigated strains were isolated by using the standard methods of single colony isolation. Mycobacterium sp. and Bacillus sp. isolated previously (Kolomeitseva et al. 2002; Tsavkelova et al. 2004), were active in the promotion of D. moschatum seed germination. We wonder if the bacterial cultures selected from one Dendrobium species were effective to another species, D. nobile. Both plants are held in the Stock greenhouse of the Main Botanical Garden (Moscow) and they are cultivated as pot plants. The bacteria were isolated on the day of sampling. For the isolation of rhizoplane bacteria, the roots were cleaned from the pine bark, rinsed in the sterile tap water, grounded with pestle in the phosphate buffer saline to prepare initial suspension and the tenfold dilutions (Tsavkelova et al. 2007a); the aliquot of 0.1 ml was plated onto the two selective media with nystatin (50 mg ml−1) to prevent the fungal growth. Tryptic soy agar (Oxoid, UK) and modified Czapek agar supplemented with yeast extract were used. For the isolation of endophytic bacteria, the roots were sterilized by immersing for 5 min in 10 % household bleach, followed with triple rinsing in distilled water. After incubation under 28 °C until single colonies could be detected, each different colony was isolated. On the basis of differences in colony characteristics, such as size, color, shape, texture, consistency, and mucilage formation, a total of 100 isolates were taken for cultivation.
Identification of the strains
Bacterial cultures tested for auxin biosynthesis (see below) and producing enough biomass on the examined nutrient media, were preliminary analyzed based on such routine morphological and biochemical characteristics as cell morphology, Gram reaction, the presence of oxidase and catalase activities, mycelium (for Actinomycetes) and spore formation. The analysis of the double strand 16S rRNA gene sequences has been performed for the cultures that showed active production of IAA. For this aim, the freeze-dried bacterial biomass was homogenized with a Mini-BeadBeater-8 (BioSpec Products, USA). DNA extraction was made by standard phenol–chloroform procedure; PCR amplification of 16S rRNA was performed by using reagents of primers designed in Sintol (Moscow, Russia) and using the “Biometra Tpersonal” thermocycler (Germany). Two pair of primers were used: the first one amplifying nearly full-length of 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) B63f (5′-CAG GCC TAA CAC ATG CAA GTC-3) and B1387r (5-GGGCGGWGT GTA CAA GGC-3′) (Marchesi et al. 1998), and partial-length UNIV 515F (5′-GTGBCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′, Kublanov et al. 2009) and BACT 907R (5′-CCGTCAATTCMTTTGAGTTT-3′, Muyzer et al. 1998). Purified genomic DNA was used as a template in the PCR reactions. The DNA amplification was performed in 25 μl mixtures using 10 ng genomic DNA, PCR buffer, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 μM of each primer, 0.25 mM dNTPs, and 0.06 U μl−1 Taq polymerase (Sintol, Russia). PCR conditions were as follows: 1 cycle of 3 min at 94 °C; 30 cycles of 20 s at 90 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C; and a final elongation for 4 min at 72 °C. 2–4 μl of the PCR product were analyzed by electrophoresis in a 1 % agarose gel with TAE 1× buffer at 80 V for 30 min. DNA GeneRuler™ 1 Kb DNA ladder (MassRuler DNA Ladder Mix, Thermo scientific, Germany) was used as control. The amplified fragment of the 16S rRNA gene was purified using Agencourt AMPure XP (Beckman Coulter) and sequenced on an ABI 3730 automated DNA sequencer using a BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems). The standard procedures recommended by the manufacturer were performed, and primers mentioned above were used. The analysis of the sequences of the 16S rRNA genes was done with software Lasergene (DNASTAR) and VectorNTI (Invitrogen). For comparative analysis and homologous sequence searches the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information website; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast) and Ribosomal Database Project (RDP, http://rdp.cme.msu.edu) databases were used.
Bacterial auxin production and colorimetric assay for indole-3-acetic acid determination
To estimate the differences in influence of exogenous tryptophan, we tested it in concentrations of 200 and 400 μg ml−1, as well as using different tryptophan (Trp) forms—its optical active l-form and racemic dl-mixture. All combinations were added to the mineral (Modified Czapek medium, MCM) and to the organic (triple diluted TSB medium) nutrient media. The measurements of produced IAA were taken in dynamics (every 24 h) till the maximal concentration was reached. Indoles content was estimated by the Salkowski method (Gordon and Weber 1951) as we previously described (Tsavkelova et al. 2007a, b). Uninoculated medium served as the control. The standard curve was prepared from the serial dilutions of 100 mM IAA stock solution (ICN, Germany). Bacterial growth was determined by the optical density (OD) at 590 nm.
Evaluation of microbial IAA biological activity by plant assay
In order to verify the presence of IAA and its biological activity, a biotest with the bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cuttings has been carried out. This plant assay is an easy model demonstrating rhizogenesis induction, which only occurs under exogenous auxin impact. The formation of the adventitious roots and its topography correlates to the IAA concentration, thus making visual and clear the auxin effects that express in appearance of new supplementary roots along the stem of the cuttings. The procedure was described earlier by Kefeli and Kutacek (1977). After that the roots and the basal part of 14 day old bean sprouts were cut off, they were submerged for 6 h in the sterile tap water (control) and bacterial culture fluids; then they were rinsed, transferred to new vials with tap water, and incubated under room temperature. The height of root formation and the number of emerging roots were analyzed after 8–10 days. All experiments included five replications and were repeated three times.
Bacterization of orchid seeds
A quantity assay for the estimation of bacterial influence on the orchid seed germination was performed by using plate counting. For this aim, the fresh mature seeds of Dendrobium nobile were used. After the seed boll was rubbed with 70 % (v/v) ethanol and opened, the orchid seeds were surface-sterilized by soaking in 10 % domestic bleach for 15 min, and then three times rinsed in sterile distilled water. About 1000 seeds were transferred aseptically with inoculation loop onto the surface of Murashige and Skoog (MS) solid medium (35 ml). Tested bacteria were cultivated for 48 h in TSB medium. An aliquot of 0.5 ml (108 CFU ml−1) of aseptically rinsed bacterial culture was added to the surface. The flasks were incubated at 23 ± 2 °C for 2 weeks in the dark, and then with a photoperiod duration of 12 h.
The estimation of seed development by counting the germinated seeds was made by analyzing the time of seed germination and the stages of plant development, such as: 0—seed coat intact, dormant embryo; 1—embryo swollen and seed coat split; 2—massive swelling, developed rhizoids; 3—emergence of leaf-like organ; 4—development of the subsequent leaves and roots. As a control, seeds were incubated with no bacterial inoculum under the same conditions. The percentage of the germinated seeds was calculated after 2 months of incubation (not swollen seeds considered as ungerminated) by counting several randomized area containing 100 seeds/seedlings (in 4–6 replicates for each variant).
Analysis of orchid–microbial interactions by scanning and transmission electron microscopy
Germinated seeds were analyzed under scanning electron-microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). They were fixed for 30 min with a 2.5 % solution of glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffered saline and dehydrated in ethanol solutions of increasing concentrations; after the final dehydration in absolute ethanol and overnight soaking in 100 % acetone, the samples were dried by critical point using an HCP-2 device (Hitachi, Japan), coated with Au–Pd (Eiko IB-3 Ion Coater, Hitachi, Japan), and examined with an JSM-6380LA scanning electron microscope (Jeol, Japan).
For transmission electron microscopy, the seedlings were fixed in 2.5 % solution of glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffered saline (0.1 M, pH 7.2), postfixed in l % osmium tetroxide (overnight), rinsed with distilled water, followed by dehydration in ethanol solutions of increasing concentrations (30 and 60 %). The samples were treated with 2 % uranyl acetate in 70 % ethanol (overnight). After the final dehydration in absolute ethanol and 100 % acetone the samples were embedded in epoxy resin. Embedding was carried out by using a mixture of the resin (Epon 812) and hardeners (DDSA and MNA) in the ratio 13:8:7, supplemented with 1 part of catalyst (DNP). After drying at 60 °C overnight, the sections were cut with a diamond knife on a LKB Ultratome V and stained with lead citrate and examined in a transmission electron microscope JEM-100B (Jeol, Japan).
Statistics
All experiments were made in three to five repetitions. The data performed as the mean ± SD. The values were separated by Student’s t test and considered to be significant at p ≤ 0.05. The data was analyzed with Microcal Origin program, OriginLab (http://www.originlab.com).
Results
Isolation of Dendrobium-associated bacteria and microbial IAA production
Considering that our final goal was to apply the bacterial strains for co-cultivation with the orchid seeds on the solid nutrient (MS) medium, the chosen species should have produced enough biomass and been active in auxin biosynthesis. Bacterial cultures that were able to proliferate and produce enough biomass after two passages of sub-culturing were screened for auxin (IAA) production. Under supplementation of 100 μg ml−1 of exogenous l-tryptophan (Trp), there were several strains producing higher than 20 μg ml−1 of auxin, while the majority of the isolates produced about 2–10 μg IAA ml−1. Several strains were selected: three of them were isolated from the aerial roots (Agrococcus sp., Roseomonas sp., Sphingomonas sp.), and Azospirillum sp., Caulobacter sp., Enterobacter sp., Streptomyces sp.—from the substrate roots of D. moschatum. These strains were firstly grouped by using classical microbiological methods, and identified based on analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequences (Table 1). Among the isolated bacteria, there were known PGPR strains, such as Azospirillum, Bacillus, Sphingomonas, and Streptomyces, as well as less popular Roseomonas and Agrococcus. Sphingomonas sp. and Agrococcus sp. were isolated as endophytes.
In order to estimate microbial auxin production, we tested different sources and concentrations of exogenous tryptophan. Such optimization is needed considering that the in vitro orchid germination is a long-term process; the supplementation of the plant growth nutrient medium with the appropriate form of Trp might assure the constant stimulation of the IAA production by symbiotic (associative) bacteria. For Roseomonas sp., Sphingomonas sp., Bacillus pumilus, and Mycobacterium sp., maxim of IAA production corresponds to the addition of 400 μg ml−1 of l-tryptophan to the mineral medium (MCM); they produced 31.6, 52.2, 22.4, and 69.8 μg ml−1 of auxin, respectively (Table 2). For Bacillus sp. and Mycobacterium sp. cultures, the difference was significant between the two tested media: in TSB the IAA amount did not exceed 3–4 μg ml−1, while in MCM IAA content reached about 20 and 70 μg ml−1, respectively. The cultures of Caulobacter sp. and Enterobacter sp. showed the opposite effect with about 20 μg ml−1 of auxin in MCM and 60 and 70 μg of IAA ml−1 in TSB (under supplementation of 400 μg ml−1 of l-Trp). However, biomass accumulation for Caulobacter sp. was much higher in the mineral medium. The stimulating effect of l-tryptophan on IAA production by Streptomyces sp. culture was visible only when the strain was cultivated in MCM but when it was transferred in TSB, the medium had smoothed the difference between l- and dl-Trp effects (Table 2). Despite the common fact that natural l-form of tryptophan is better assimilated and thus, stimulates the IAA biosynthesis with more effectiveness, our results show that the difference between concentrations and isomeric forms is less obvious than the medium composition. The amounts of IAA produced by Roseomonas sp. with 200 and 400 μg ml−1 of l-Trp in TSB differed slightly, while the difference in auxin production in mineral medium was significant, although the biomass amounts were similar. The stimulative effect of exogenous Trp on auxin biosynthesis confirms the Trp-dependent way of IAA biosynthesis in all investigated bacteria. Under supplementation of MCM with 200 μg ml−1 of l-Trp, Azospirillum sp. and Agrococcus sp. produced 31.8 ± 1.3 and 12.4 ± 1.8 μg of IAA ml−1, respectively (data not shown). Additionally, we showed that Mycobacterium and Bacillus did not much reduce their capacity for auxin production: Mycobacterium sp. kept it on the level of 47.7 and 69.8 µg IAA ml−1 in MCM-L200 and MCM-L400, respectively. Bacillus pumilus produced 7.5 (MCM-L200) and 20.4 (MCM-L400) µg IAA ml−1.
Evaluation of microbial IAA biological activity
Although bacteria can produce diverse indolic compounds, only IAA is active in the rhizogenesis of plants. To show that the produced microbial IAA is biologically active, we tested the cultural broth on the bean cuttings, susceptible to exogenous IAA (pure standard compound) that we reported previously (Tsavkelova et al. 2007a). Each treatment of the cuttings resulted in the increased number of the roots and their length; the root formation height exceeded the control sample values up to 3–17-fold. The most indicative results of the assay are summarized in Table 3. The tested strains did not suppress the plant growth except Enterobacter sp., which provoked the negative symptoms, such as rotting of the stem.
Bacterization of the Dendrobium nobile seeds with orchid-associated bacteria
In this assay, we pursued several goals: to test the application of the strains isolated from one orchid species (D. moschatum) to promote germination of another species (D. nobile); to compare the capacities of the previously and newly isolated bacterial strains in seed bacterization by using fresh mature seeds and complex Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium with no addition of any plant growth stimulators; to confirm the necessity of the selection process among the potentially beneficial bacteria that are usually recognized as PGPR. None synthetic plant growth stimulators were used, but supplementation with l-Trp for favoring IAA production by chosen bacteria.
We changed the list of selected bacteria by discarding Enterobacter sp. and Caulobacter sp. cultures: the first strain did not seem promising due to rotting effect caused on kidney bean cuttings. Caulobacter sp. and Roseomonas sp. cultures failed to grow, and they produced insufficient biomass on MS medium used for orchid seed cultivation. Thus, Agrococcus sp., Streptomyces sp., Azospirillum sp. and Sphingomonas sp. were selected as potential PGPR strains.
Under the tested conditions, Azospirillum sp. and Streptomyces sp. provoked obvious negative effect on the seed germination. The abundant extracellular mucus, produced by Azospirillum sp. completely drowned the seeds, whereas Streptomyces sp. suppressed the germination and obstructed the growth of already germinated seedlings (additional data are given in Online Resource 1). On the contrary, the prominent positive influence among the newly isolated strains was observed with Sphingomonas and Agrococcus cultures (Table 4). Photosynthetic activity of the protocorms could be observed after 2.5 weeks of incubation. In 9 weeks of incubation, all the seedlings treated with the bacteria had one to two well-developed leaves and rhizoids, whereas the control plants possessed only one well-developed leave-like organ. The highest percentage of the germinated seeds (94 %) was revealed in co-culture with Agrococcus sp. (Table 4), the genus that has not been previously shown as a PGPR strain. Another bacteria, Sphingomonas sp., promoted 92 % of seeds to germinate and to switch from the just swollen embryo to the following phases. Also noteworthy, both PGPR strains were isolated as endophytes.
The cultures of Mycobacterium sp. and B. pumilus also promoted seed germination, confirming their effectiveness by stable capacity to stimulate the growth and development of the orchid seeds in vitro. In our first experiments, Mycobacterium sp. derived from D. moschatum promoted the germination of 1.2 % of its seeds (with none of the seeds germinated in the control, Tsavkelova et al. 2007b). In this study, by using complex MS medium and fresh mature seeds of another Dendrobium plant, Mycobacterium sp. enhanced its activity, promoting 12 % seeds to grow; in the co-culture with B. pumilus allowed 14 % more D. nobile seeds to germinate (Table 4).
Thus, no evident specificity between two different species of Dendrobium orchids and their associative PGPR was observed: isolated from D. moschatum, they beneficially promoted the germination of D. nobile. However, the peculiarity of orchid seed biology (the minute size, no endosperm) as well as the necessity of using complex carbohydrate-rich nutrient media appear to narrow the application of only known PGPR, particularly those producing abundant extracellular polysaccharide matrix.
Scanning and transmission electron microscopy of the Dendrobium nobile seeds, germinated in vitro in co-cultures with bacteria
We used SEM and TEM techniques in order to observe whether and how the PGPR strains interact with the orchid seeds. We found that PGPR extensively attach to the surface of the seed coat, preferring to colonize the stria on the wrinkled and ribbed seed surface. They spread across the surface, embedding in the furrows and grooves (Fig. 1a–c). No bacteria were detected in the control samples (Fig. 1g), while the inoculated seeds were massively covered with bacteria. The microorganisms multiply and form microcolonies and new micropopulations on the rhizoids. The prominent role in the colonization process is lead by extracellular matrix (EM) excreted by bacterial cells that favors the formation of bacterial agglomerates and clusters, particularly within the surface furrows. At the same time, together with bacterial clusters, joined by EM, many individual cells were also seen on the seed surface, settling the new territories and engendering new clusters and microcolonies (Fig. 1a–d). In contrast to the seed growth promoting bacteria, Streptomyces sp. that provoked a negative effect on the germination did not colonize the seeds until they were alive (Fig. 1e). Gradually, the growth of germinated seeds slowed down and their resistance decreased, then the mycelia braided the seed (Fig. 1f).
The PGPR strain of Mycobacterium, on the contrary, immediately colonized the rhizoids, followed by populating the developed roots (Fig. 1a). Thick EM entrapped the cells by covering them like a blanket that was distinctly seen in the case of Sphingomonas sp. (Fig. 1c). Together with the vegetative cells, B. pumilus abundantly produced spores kept in chains and clusters within the microcolonies and spread over the seed surface (Fig. 1d). By an example of the seedlings, treated with cultures of Mycobacterium and Sphingomonas sp. (Fig. 2a–c), we revealed the bacteria penetrating inside the testa (Fig. 2a, b), and in the velamen cells of the roots of the 6 month old plantlet (Fig. 2c). TEM observations confirmed the preferable endophytic localization of previously isolated from the rhizoplane of D. moschatum, Mycobacterium sp. (Fig. 3a) as single cells or micro colonies, surrounded by EM. Bacteria entered inside the apoplast of the root cortex of Dendrobium nobile seedlings, actively colonizing the space between the cortical cells of root parenchyma. The bacterial cells were shown to actively multiply (different stages of cell division were noticed, Fig. 3b). In the seedlings inoculated with Mycobacterium sp., we noticed that plastids stored big starch grains, and additionally osmophilic (lipid) globules (Fig. 3c).
Discussion
The plant surfaces of various tropical plants provide a favorable habitat for microbial colonization (Baldotto and Olivares 2008). In this study, we aimed to isolate associative bacteria not only from the root surface of D. moschatum, as we previously reported (Tsavkelova et al. 2004), but also those from the inner root tissues. Such endophytic microorganisms colonize plant tissues, usually showing no external sign of infection or negative influence on their host (Ryan et al. 2008). In order to find the appropriate bacterial cultures to promote orchid seed germination, we tested them for auxin production, and several strains, ranging in IAA biosynthesis from 1.3 to 47.7 μg IAA ml−1 were selected. The known auxin producing bacteria, which are able to improve plant growth, vary in IAA biosynthesis capacity between 5 and 10 up to 200 μg IAA ml−1 and higher (e.g. Khalid et al. 2004; Shahab et al. 2009; Habibi et al. 2014). The microbial production of a key auxin substance, IAA, is mostly Trp-dependent (Spaepen et al. 2007). The IAA biosynthesis by the investigated bacteria was also stimulated by Trp, although the strains significantly differed in auxin production feedback to the addition of l- and dl-Trp, supplemented to the mineral MCM or organic TSB media (Table 2). Such specific reaction supports the idea that optimization of cultivation conditions for IAA production is species-specific. Bharucha and Patel (2008) reported that the IAA biosynthesis of Pseudomonas putida UB1 increased when the l-Trp (200 μg ml−1) medium was supplemented with 0.5 % of sucrose and 10 mg ml−1 of (NH4)2SO4, whereas the best conditions for the nitrogen-fixing bacteria were when the yeast extract mannitol medium was supplemented with 300 μg ml−1 of l-Trp (Shokri and Emtiazi 2010), and the organic broth (8 g L−1 of meat extract and 100 μg ml−1 of l-Trp) was the optimal medium for Pantoea agglomerans PVM (Apine and Jadhav 2011).
The plant assay (Table 3) showed that the microbial IAA was active in rhizogenesis, and the bean cuttings were highly susceptible to it. However, the negative outcome was that Enterobacter sp. induced rotting of the plant stem. De Melo Pereira et al. (2012) reported that after inoculation of the strawberry plants with endophytic Enterobacter strains, some of them increased growth of the plants, whereas the treatment with E. ludwigii lead to inhibitory effects on shoot length.
Among the selected bacteria, two endophytic species of Sphingomonas sp. and Agrococcus sp. turned out to be the most prominent in orchid seed bacterization assay (Table 4). Although there is information on the presence of Agrococcus versicolor in phyllosphere of potato plants (Behrendt et al. 2008), this is the first report on Agrococcus sp. as an active PGPR strain producing IAA, establishing tight interactions with the orchid-host plant, and promoting its seed germination. On the contrary, Sphingomonas strains are the recognized endophytes of sweet corn (McInroy and Kloepper 1995), black cottonwood, willow (Doty et al. 2009), and rice plants (Videira et al. 2009). Apart from nitrogen fixation, sphingomonads synthesize siderophores (Sessitsch et al. 2004), and are capable of gibberellins and IAA production, promoting tomato plant growth (Khan et al. 2014). On the contrary, Streptomyces sp. suppressed the orchid germination and protocorm development (Fig. 1f). One of the possible reasons for this could be the production of antibiotics, which are known for their phytotoxic effects, particularly on root elongation (Liu et al. 2009) as well as foliage photosynthesis and photosynthetic pigment content (Opriş et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2015).
The genus Azospirillum is considered as one of the most representative PGPR (Cassán et al. 2014) and is widely applied for bacterization of the different crop plants (Mehnaz and Lazarovits 2006). A. amazonense was also detected on the roots of several cultivable Brazilian orchids—Oncidium varicosum, Vanda tricolor, Dendrobium fimbriatum, and D. nobile (Lange and Moreira 2002). However, under conditions of in vitro orchid seed germination, Azospirillum sp. overproduced biomass and extracellular matrix (Online Resource 1), thus making it inappropriate for application in co-cultures with the minute orchid seeds. Complex solid media used for this aim usually contain high carbohydrate amounts, plant growth stimulators, vitamins, and other various nutrient substances (reviewed in Teixeira da Silva et al. 2015). Such sucrose-rich media contributes to proliferation of the bacterial population and provoke the abundant production of the microbial extracellular polysaccharide-containing matrix. Previously (Tsavkelova et al. 2007b), we showed that no germination of D. moschatum seeds happened with another usually considered as PGPR strain of Rhizobium sp. due to the same excessive production of extracellular mucus that entirely covered the seeds and deprived them of light and air.
At the same time, extracellular matrix, composed of exopolysaccharides, proteins and DNA, is an inherent part of biofilms that play structuring and communicative roles as well as protect bacterial cells from UV radiation, predation, desiccation, and antibiosis (reviewed in Oleskin et al. 2000; Morris and Monier 2003). Biofilms help rhizobacteria, particularly non-spore-forming species, to colonize plant roots (Rinaudi and Giordano 2010). Vice versa, plant polysaccharides (the components of plant’s cell wall) induce the biofilm formation, although microbial colonization capacities vary according to the host-plant, as it was shown by Bacillus-tomato and Bacillus–Arabidopsis examples (Beauregard et al. 2013).
By using SEM and TEM microscopy (Figs. 1, 2, 3), we showed that the orchid PGPR strains of Mycobacterium sp., Agrococcus sp., Sphingomonas sp., and Bacillus pumilus actively colonized the surface of the seeds, formed microcolonies, and penetrated inside the plant tissues as endophytes. Such interactions were also mediated by their capacities for biofilm formation (Figs. 1a–d, 2a–c). Our results agreed with those of Ryan et al. (2008) that successful endophyte colonization involves a compatible host plant, and that bacteria colonize the plant surfaces as solitary cells, microcolonies, or biofilms (Baldotto and Olivares 2008). Endophytes might enter the roots through splits and cracks at the points of root emergence, subsequently colonizing the intercellular spaces, aerenchyma, and cortical cells, as it was shown for the rice PGPR strain, Herbaspirillum seropedicae Z67 (James et al. 2002).
Orchid germination differs from all other plants: orchid seeds are capable of swelling due to minimal water uptake and optimal light and temperature conditions, but for the further development of the protocorm, mycorrhizal colonization or exogenous carbohydrate supply is strictly needed (Smith and Read 2008). The stages of D. nobile seed germination and seedling developmental growth under in vitro conditions are described in the recently published review (Teixeira da Silva et al. 2015); it can take weeks and even months until the seedlings produce one or more leaves and roots (Fig. 1i). After the testa is ruptured, the emerged rhizoids (Fig. 1a, h) of the photosynthetically active protocorms attract the bacterial cells, apparently by the produced exudates (Fig. 1a). Plant root exudates usually contain sugars, amino acids, and organic acids, in addition to diverse secondary metabolites (Kamilova et al. 2006; Broeckling et al. 2008). We may only assume the more or less similar content of the secreted compounds by the orchid seedlings, since the nascent rhizoids have only about 30–50 µm in length (Fig. 1a, h), and can hardly be analyzed. Thus, further separate studies should focus on identifying the composition of the rhizoid exudates of the orchid protocorms.
Most auxin in the rhizosphere is derived from Trp secreted by the plant roots and effectively converted to IAA by some rhizosphere bacteria (Kamilova et al. 2006). Plant roots are sensitive to the fluctuations in auxin content: low amounts of IAA (between 10−9 and 10−12 M) stimulate primary root growth, whereas higher IAA levels can inhibit it (Meuwley and Pilet 1991; Patten and Glick 2002). Paenibacillus lentimorbus and P. macerans isolated from the meristems of Cymbidium eburneum, promoted the growth of in vitro micropropagated seedlings of another orchid, Cattleya loddigesii, by producing only 1.5–3.6 µg IAA ml−1 (Faria et al. 2013). Bacillus sp. and Enterobacter sp. isolated from the roots of Cattleya walkeriana, produced 18 and 32 µg IAA ml−1, respectively (Galdiano Júnior et al. 2011), and promoted the host growth during its ex vitro acclimatization (Galdiano Júnior et al. 2011). Yang et al. (2014) reported on the bacterization of Dendrobium officinale seeds with growth-promoting Sphingomonas paucimobilis ZJSH1, which increased stem height by 8.6 % and fresh weight by 7.5 %, and produced 11.75 ng ml−1 of IAA. In the present study, endophytic strain of Sphingomonas sp. produced 29.4 µg IAA ml−1 and promoted an extra 16 % of D. nobile seeds to germinate (Table 4), although the best results we obtained with a newly reported orchid endophyte, Agrococcus sp. with 12.4 µg of IAA ml−1 and 18 % more seed germinated.
We previously showed that originally derived from Dendrobium leonis, B. pumilus, promoted seed germination and development of several epiphytic and terrestrial plants of Dendrobium, Paphiopedilum, Cranichis, and Dactylorhiza orchids, although its initial IAA production did not exceed 9 µg IAA ml−1 (Kolomeitseva et al. 2002). In this study, we confirmed that no obvious direct specificity exists between orchid and selected PGPR partners. Such indifference of the host-plant is curiously a good feature, since the biotechnological application of the IAA-producing bacteria provides an additional advantage for multiple and long-term usage of once selected strains. Nevertheless, the profitable orchid PGPR should satisfy certain basic requirements—to be recognized as cultivable cultures, not over-proliferating either with biomass or extracellular matrix, and to be active in IAA biosynthesis, since IAA is responsible for the acceleration of rhizogenesis. Other activities, such as nitrogen fixation, phosphorous solubilization or production of antimicrobias are not relevant, when the complex media, supplemented with all needed major nutrients and trace elements, are used. Thus, orchid-associated bacteria provide a successful technique for orchid seed germination and ex situ conservation, playing an important role in the early stages of plant development.
References
Ahemad M, Kibret M (2014) Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: current perspective. J King Saud Univ Sci 26:1–20
Apine OA, Jadhav JP (2011) Optimization of medium for indole-3-acetic acid production using Pantoea agglomerans strain PVM. J Appl Microbiol 110:1235–1244
Baldotto LEB, Olivares FL (2008) Phylloepiphytic interaction between bacteria and different plant species in a tropical agricultural system. Can J Microbiol 54:918–931
Beauregard PB, Chaib Y, Vlamakis H, Losick R, Koltera R (2013) Bacillus subtilis biofilm induction by plant polysaccharides. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:E1621–E1630
Behrendt U, Schumann P, Ulrich A (2008) Agrococcus versicolor sp. nov., an actinobacterium associated with the phyllosphere of potato plants. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:2833–2838
Bharucha U, Patel K (2008) Optimization of indole acetic acid production by Pseudomonas putida UB1 and its effect as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on mustard (Brassica nigra). Agric Res 2:215–221
Broeckling CD, Broz AK, Bergelson J, Manter DK, Vivanco JM (2008) Root exudates regulate soil fungal community composition and diversity. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:738–744
Cassán F, Perrig D, Sgroy V, Luna V (2014) Basic and technological aspects of phytohormone production by microorganisms: Azospirillum sp. as a model of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. In: Maheshwari DK (ed) Bacteria in agrobiology. Plant nutrient management. Springer, Berlin, pp 141–182
De Melo Pereira GV, Magalhães KT, Lorenzetii ER, Souza TP, Schwan RF (2012) A multiphasic approach for the identification of endophytic bacterial in strawberry fruit and their potential for plant growth promotion. Microb Ecol 63:405–417
Doty S, Oakley B, Xin G, Kang JW, Singleton G, Khan Z, Vajzovic A, Staley JT (2009) Diazotrophic endophytes of native black cottonwood and willow. Symbiosis 47:23–33
Faria DC, Dias AC, Melo IS, de Carvalho Costa FE (2013) Endophytic bacteria isolated from orchid and their potential to promote plant growth. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29:217–221
Galdiano Júnior RF, Pedrinho EAN, Castellane TCL, Lemos EGM (2011) Auxin-producing bacteria isolated from the roots of Cattleya walkeriana, an endangered Brazilian orchid, and their role in acclimatization. Rev Bras Ciência Solo 35:729–737
Gordon SA, Weber RP (1951) Colorimetric estimation of indoleacetic acid. Plant Physiol 26:192–195
Habibi S, Djedidi S, Prongjunthuek K, Mortuza Md, Ohkama-Ohtsu N, Sekimoto H, Yokoyoma T (2014) Physiological and genetic characterization of rice nitrogen fixer PGPR isolated from rhizosphere soils of different crops. Plant Soil 379:51–66
James EK, Gyaneshwar P, Mathan N, Barraquio WL, Reddy PM, Iannetta PP, Olivares FL, Ladha JK (2002) Infection and colonization of rice seedlings by the plant growth-promoting bacterium Herbaspirillum seropedicae Z67. Mol Plant Microb Interact 15:894–906
Kamilova F, Kravchenko LV, Shaposhnikov AI, Azarova T, Makarova N, Lugtenberg B (2006) Organic acids, sugars, and l-tryptophane in exudates of vegetables growing on stonewool and their effects on activities of rhizosphere bacteria. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 19:250–256
Kefeli VI, Kutacek M (1977) Phenolic substances and their possible role in plant growth regulation. Plant Growth Regul 6:181–188
Khalid A, Arshad M, Zahir ZA (2004) Screening plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for improving growth and yield of wheat. J Appl Microbiol 96:473–480
Khan AL, Waqas M, Kang SM, Al-Harrasi A, Hussain J, Al-Rawahi A, Al-Khiziri S, Ullah I, Ali L, Jung HY, Lee IJ (2014) Bacterial endophyte Sphingomonas sp. LK11 produces gibberellins and IAA and promotes tomato plant growth. J Microbiol 52:689–695
Knudson L (1922) Nonsymbiotic germination of orchid seeds. Bot Gazette 73:1–25
Kolomeitseva GL, Tsavkelova EA, Gusev EM, Malina NE (2002) On symbiosis of orchids and active isolate of the bacterium Bacillus pumilus in culture in vitro. Bull GBS Russ Acad Sci 183:117–126 (in Russian with English abstract)
Kublanov IV, Perevalova AA, Slobodkina GB, Lebedinsky AV, Bidzhieva SK, Kolganova TV, Kaliberda EN, Rumsh LD, Haertlé T, Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA (2009) Biodiversity of thermophilic prokaryotes with hydrolytic activities in hot springs of Uzon Caldera, Kamchatka (Russia). Appl Environ Microbiol 75:286–291
Lange A, Moreira FMS (2002) Detecção de Azospirillum amazonense em raízes e rizosfera de Orchidaceae e de outras famílias vegetais. R Bras Ci Solo 26:529–533
Liu F, Ying G-G, Tao R, Zhao J-L, Yang J-F, Zhao L-F (2009) Effects of six selected antibiotics on plant growth and soil microbial and enzymatic activities. Environ Pollut 157:1636–1642
Marchesi JR, Sato T, Weightman AJ, Martin TA, Fry JC, Hiom SJ (1998) Design and evaluation of useful bacterium-specific PCR primers that amplify genes coding for bacterial 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:795–799
McInroy JA, Kloepper JW (1995) Survey of indigenous bacterial endophytes from cotton and sweet corn. Plant Soil 173:337–342
Mehnaz S, Lazarovits G (2006) Inoculation effects of Pseudomonas putida, Gluconacetobacter azotocaptans, and Azospirillum lipoferum on corn plant growth under greenhouse conditions. Microb Ecol 51:326–335
Meuwley P, Pilet PE (1991) Local treatment with indole-3-acetic acid induces differential growth responses in Zea mays L. roots. Planta 185:58–64
Morris CE, Monier JM (2003) The ecological significance of biofilm formation by plant-associated bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 41:429–453
Muyzer G, Brinkhoff T, Nübel U, Santegoeds C, Schäfer H, Wawer C (1998) Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) in microbial ecology. In: Akkermans ADL, van Elsas JD, de Bruijn FJ (eds) Molecular microbial ecology manual. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1–27
Oleskin AV, Bottvinko IV, Tsavkelova EA (2000) Colonial organization and intercellular communication of microorganisms. Microbiology 69:309–327
Opriş O, Copaciu F, Soran ML, Ristoiu D, Niinemets Ü, Copolovici L (2013) Influence of nine antibiotics on key secondary metabolites and physiological characteristics in Triticum aestivum: leaf volatiles as a promising new tool to assess toxicity. Ecotoxicol Environ Safe 87:70–79
Passari AK, Mishra VK, Saikia R, Gupta VK, Singh BP (2015) Isolation, abundance and phylogenetic affiliation of endophytic actinomycetes associated with medicinal plants and screening for their in vitro antimicrobial biosynthetic potential. Front Microbiol. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00273
Patten CL, Glick BR (2002) Role of Pseudomonas putida indole acetic acid in development of the host plant root system. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:3795–3801
Rinaudi L, Giordano W (2010) An integrated view of biofilm formation in rhizobia. FEMS Microbiol Lett 304:1–11
Roberts DL, Dixon KW (2008) Orchids. Curr Biol 18:R325–R329
Ryan RP, Germaine K, Franks A, Ryan DJ, Dowling DN (2008) Bacterial endophytes: recent developments and applications. FEMS Microbiol Lett 278:1–9
Saharan BS, Nehra V (2011) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: a critical review. Life Sci Med Res 21:1–30
Sessitsch A, Reiter B, Berg G (2004) Endophytic bacterial communities of field-grown potato plants and their plant-growth-promoting and antagonistic abilities. Can J Microbiol 4:239–249
Shahab S, Ahmed N, Khan NS (2009) Indole acetic acid production and enhanced plant growth promotion by indigenous PSBs. Afr J Agric Res 4:1312–1316
Shekhovtsova N, Marakaev O, Pervushina K, Osipov G (2013) The underground organ microbial complexes of moorland spotted orchid Dactylorhiza maculata (L.) Soó (Orchidaceae). Adv Biosci Biotechnol 4:35–42
Shokri D, Emtiazi G (2010) Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production in symbiotic and non-symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria and its optimization by Taguchi design. Curr Microbiol 61:217–225
Smith SE, Read D (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 3rd edn. Academic Press, New York
Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J, Remans R (2007) Indole-3-acetic acid in microbial and microorganism-plant signaling. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31:425–448
Teixeira da Silva JA, Tsavkelova EA, Zeng S, Ng TB, Parthibhan S, Dobránszki J, Cardoso JC, Rao MV (2015) Symbiotic in vitro seed propagation of Dendrobium: fungal and bacterial partners and their influence on plant growth and development. Planta 242:1–22
Tsavkelova EA, Cherdyntseva TA, Netrusov AI (2004) Bacteria associated with the roots of epiphytic orchids. Microbiology 73:710–715
Tsavkelova EA, Klimova SIu, Cherdyntseva TA, Netrusov AI (2006) Microbial producers of plant growth stimulators and their practical use, a review. Appl Biochem Microbiol 2:117–126
Tsavkelova EA, Cherdyntseva TA, Botina SG, Netrusov AI (2007a) Bacteria associated with orchid roots and microbial production of auxin. Microbiol Res 162:69–76
Tsavkelova EA, Cherdyntseva TA, Klimova SY, Shestakov AI, Botina SG, Netrusov AI (2007b) Orchid-associated bacteria produce indole-3-acetic acid, promote seed germination, and increase their microbial yield in response to exogenous auxin. Arch Microbiol 188:655–664
Videira SS, De Araujo JLS, da Rodrigues LS, Baldani VL, Baldani JI (2009) Occurrence and diversity of nitrogen-fixing Sphingomonas bacteria associated with rice plants grown in Brazil. FEMS Microbiol Lett 293:11–19
Wang Xu, Ryu D, Houtkooper RH, Auwerx J (2015) Antibiotic use and abuse: a threat to mitochondria and chloroplasts with impact on research, health, and environment. BioEssays 37:1045–1053
Wilkinson KG, Dixon KW, Sivasithamparam K (1989) Interaction of soil bacteria, mycorrhizal fungi and orchid seed in relation to germination of Australian orchids. New Phytol 112:429–435
Wilkinson KG, Dixon KW, Sivasithamparam K, Ghisalberti EL (1994) Effect of IAA on symbiotic germination of an Australian orchid and its production by orchid-associated bacteria. Plant Soil 159:291–295
Yang S, Zhang X, Cao Z, Zhao K, Wang S, Chen M, Hu X (2014) Growth-promoting Sphingomonas paucimobilis ZJSH1 associated with Dendrobium officinale through phytohormone production and nitrogen fixation. Microb Biotechnol 7:611–620
Acknowledgments
We thank Mr. Paul Girling for grammatically editing the manuscript. This study was partially supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant (project #14-50-00029).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsavkelova, E.A., Egorova, M.A., Leontieva, M.R. et al. Dendrobium nobile Lindl. seed germination in co-cultures with diverse associated bacteria. Plant Growth Regul 80, 79–91 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-016-0155-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-016-0155-1