Abstract
Aims
We aimed to identify plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria that could be used to develop a biofertilizer for rice.
Methods
To obtain plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, rhizosphere soils from different crops (rice, wheat, oats, crabgrass, maize, ryegrass, and sweet potato) were inoculated to rice plants. In total, 166 different bacteria were isolated and their plant growth-promoting traits were evaluated in terms of colony morphology, indole-3-acetic acid production, acetylene reduction activity, and phosphate solubilization activity. Moreover, genetic analysis was carried out to evaluate their phylogenetic relationships based on 16S rRNA sequence data.
Results
Strains of Bacillus altitudinis, Pseudomonas monteilii, and Pseudomonas mandelii formed associations with rice plants and fixed nitrogen. A strain of Rhizobium daejeonense showed nitrogen fixation activity in an in vitro assay and in vivo. Strains of B. altitudinis and R. daejeonense derived from rice rhizosphere soil, strains of P. monteilii and Enterobacter cloacae derived from wheat rhizosphere soil, and a strain of Bacillus pumilus derived from maize rhizosphere soil significantly promoted rice plant growth.
Conclusions
These methods are effective to identify candidate species that could be developed as biofertilizers for target crops.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The rhizosphere is defined as the volume of soil affected by plant roots (Hinsinger et al. 2009). The rhizosphere has important functions in plant nutrition, health, and yield. Different types of substances diffuse from plant roots into the rhizosphere, where they stimulate microbial activity. These substances include carbohydrates (sugars and oligosaccharides), organic acids, vitamins, nucleotides, flavonoids, enzymes, hormones, and volatile compounds (Prescott et al. 1990). The composition and amount of microorganisms in the rhizosphere vary among different plants because of variations in the quantity and quality of compounds exuded by the plants (Söderberg et al. 2002). Microbial communities in rhizospheres also vary among different plants, and are affected by the plant species (Grayston et al. 1998), soil type (Campbell et al. 1997), soil depth (Kuske et al. 2002), and cultivation practices (tillage/crop rotation) (Lupwayi et al. 1998). However, the plant species has the greatest effect on plant-associated habitats (Wieland et al. 2001).
Many microorganisms coexist in the rhizosphere, and bacteria are the most abundant among them. Rhizosphere bacteria that can inhabit plant roots are potentially useful for stimulating plant growth and increasing crop yields. These bacteria are collectively referred to as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) (Kloepper and Schroth 1978). They are distributed in different parts of the plants such as root tissues, leaves and stems. The PGPR can directly stimulate plant growth as a result of various bioactivities, including biological nitrogen fixation (Boddey and Dobereiner 1988), phytohormone production (Chabot et al. 1996; Bent et al. 2001), phosphate solubilization (Reyes et al. 2002), secretion of siderophores (Ahmad et al. 2008), and production of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase, which reduces ethylene concentrations in plants (Duan et al. 2009). They can also indirectly affect plant growth by acting as biocontrol agents to suppress pathogenic organisms via production of diverse chemical compounds (Compant et al. 2005; Romero et al. 2007).
The greater part of plants species are associated with PGPR. Based on previous reports, bacterial strains with PGPR activities have been found in the following genera: Acinetobacter, Agrobacterium, Agromonas, Alcaligenes, Arthrobacter, Azoarcus, Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Bacillus, Beijerinckia, Bradyrhizobium, Caulobacter, Chromobacterium, Derxia, Enterobacter, Erwinia, Flavobacterium, Frankia, Herbaspirillum, Hyphomycrobium, Klebsiella, Micrococcous, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Serratia, Stenotrophomonas, Thiobacillus, Xanthomonas, and Zoogloea (Tripathi et al. 2002; Hurek and Reinhold-Hurek 2003; Gray and Smith 2005; Choudhary and Johri 2009; Schmidt et al. 2012).
In many Asian countries, PGPR have been developed as biofertilizers for sustainable agriculture (Ohyama et al. 2006). However, few trials on PGPR as biofertilizers have been conducted in Japan. To our knowledge, there is only one report on a PGPR that promoted growth of rice in Japan. The Azospirillum sp. strain B510, which was isolated from a rice plant, was shown to enhance rice growth and yields (Isawa et al. 2010). Generally, it is considered that rhizospheres of different plants are colonized by different microbial communities of PGPR that differ genetically and physiologically. This may show differences in their ability to fix nitrogen, solubilize phosphate, and produce indole acetic acid (IAA).
Overall, the aim of our research is to isolate PGPR that could be developed as a biofertilizer for rice crops. In this study, we collected rhizosphere soils from seven different plants (rice, maize, wheat, oat, rye grass, crabgrass, and sweet potato) grown in soils with identical texture (Andosol) and basal fertilization management, and rhizosphere soil from rice grown in alluvial soil. We used the soils as inoculants to treat rice seedlings, and isolated 166 bacterial strains. We evaluated the physiological and genetic characteristics of these strains to evaluate the diversity of PGPR in the rhizosphere soil from each plant.
Materials and methods
Soil sampling
We collected rhizosphere soil samples from seven different crops (rice, maize, wheat, oat, rye grass, crabgrass, and sweet potato) at a depth of 0–15 cm from two sites; Honmachi paddy (rice) and Saiwai-Cho upland fields (other crops), Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Fuchu, Japan. Regarding to the topsoil depth collected, we considered that 0–15 cm depth is the active part for fibrous roots of the six gramineous plants selected with the exception of sweet potato. The samples were kept at 4 °C until use.
Isolation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
The procedures used to isolate and characterize PGPR are shown in Fig. 1. To isolate PGPR, the seeds of two Japanese rice varieties (cv. Leaf star and cv. Nipponbare) were surface-sterilized in 70 % ethanol for 30 s, soaked in 3 % sodium hypochlorite for 3 min, and then the seeds were rinsed five times with sterilized distilled water. We took 20 g soil from each sample and used it to inoculate seeds in a pot containing sterilized vermiculite. Pots were kept in growth chamber under controlled conditions (16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod, at 25 °C/18 °C day/night temperatures). After 21 days, all plants were harvested from the pots, washed in running tap water to remove vermiculite, and then the roots and leaves were washed out five times with sterile distilled water in side of laminar flow cabinet (Sanyo Bio clean bench MCV-B91F, Tokyo). Leaves and roots were cut into 1–2 cm pieces, and the tissues were macerated using a sterilized mortar and pestle in the laminar flow cabinet. The turbid solution was diluted (10−1–10−5) with sterile distilled water. One loop from each of the diluted turbid solutions was inoculated into a screw-capped tube containing 15 ml Nitrogen-free NFb semi-solid medium (Döbereiner et al. 1976). The tubes were incubated at 28 °C for 48 h, and bacterial growth was observed as the formation of veil-like pellicles. Then, 10 μL from every layer (pellicle) was spread on N-free NFb agar medium plates. The plates were placed in anaerobic jars and microaerophilic conditions were established using a gas pack. The plates were incubated for 3 days at 28 °C. Bacterial colonies were re-streaked onto fresh NFb-Agar plates until typical bacterial colonies were obtained. Single colonies were picked and maintained on slants of NFb medium at 4 °C.
Morphological characteristics of bacterial isolates
To examine the morphological characteristics of isolates grown on NFb agar plates, one loopful of each bacterial colony was diluted in a microtube containing 1 ml sterilized distilled water and mixed well. Then, 5 μL was transferred onto an NFb agar plate and incubated for 3 days at 28 °C. The morphological characteristics of isolates including the colony form, elevation, margin, and color were observed and recorded under a stereo microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production
To detect and quantify IAA, each strain was inoculated into NFb broth containing 100 mg L−1 L-tryptophan. The cultures were incubated at 28 °C for 2 days in the dark. Then, the cell suspensions were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min to remove cells, and the concentration of IAA in the supernatant was determined by the Salkovski colorimetric technique (Glickmann and Dessaux 1995) by measuring absorbance at 530 nm with a spectrophotometer (Ultrospec 3300 pro, Amersham Biosciences, Cambridge, United Kingdom). The cell density was determined by the plate dilution method.
Acetylene reduction assay
The acetylene reduction assay (ARA) provides an estimate of nitrogen-fixing activity. For the ARA, bacterial cultures were grown in vials containing N-free semi-solid NFb medium and incubated at 28 °C for 2 days. Then, 10 % acetylene (v/v) was injected into the culture vial and the cultures were further incubated for 1 h at 30 °C. Then, the concentration of ethylene in the vial was determined using a Shimadzu GC8A gas chromatograph (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Poropak N column (Chrompack, Middelburg, The Netherlands). Un-inoculated tubes served as the control. The number of cells in each vial was determined by the plate dilution method.
Detection of inorganic phosphate solubilization activity
Bacterial isolates were grown in NFb broth medium at 28 °C for 48 h. Then, 5 μl of each culture was spotted onto Pikovskaia medium containing tricalcium phosphate (Pikovskaia 1948). The plates were incubated for 7 days at 28 °C. Formation of a clear zone around the bacterial colony indicated that the isolate was able to solubilize phosphate. The phosphate-solubilizing activity of each isolate was evaluated by measuring the size of the halozone.
Molecular characterization
We selected 30 of the 166 isolates, based on their ability to produce IAA and ethylene, and sequenced their 16S rRNA regions. The isolates were grown in NFb broth medium at 25 °C for 4 days. Prior to genomic isolation, the cells were harvested and washed twice with equal volumes of TNE buffer. The genomic DNA was extracted from isolates using the method of Yokoyama et al. (1996) with a slight modification, in that an additional 55 μL 10 % (v/v) cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) was used. The DNA concentration and purity was checked using a NanoDrop 2000 UV–vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA).
DNA amplification and sequencing
The PCR amplifications and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene were conducted as described previously (Yokoyama 2008). The bacterial universal primers 1F (5′-AGT TTG ATC CTG GCT C-3′) and 3R (5′-AAG GAG GTG ATC CAG CC-3′) were used for sequencing the 16S rRNA gene. These primers are located at positions 11–26 and 1,472–1,489 in the 16S rRNA gene of Escherichia coli. Amplifications were performed using 50 μL reaction mixtures containing 2.5 μL primer set 1 F and 3R (10 μM each), 0.5 μL Taq DNA Polymerase (ExTaq polymerase 5 UmL-1, Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan), 5 μL 10× reaction buffer, 4 μL dNTP mixture, and 1 μL DNA template (200–250 ng DNA). The thermal cycling conditions were as follows: denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min. followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 55 °C for 1 min, extension at 72 °C for 3 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The PCR products were checked by electrophoresis on 1.5 (w/v) agarose gels. Amplified DNA bands corresponding to the 16S rRNA gene were purified using a QIAEX II agarose gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The purified products were reacted using an ABI Prism BigDye Terminator v 3.1 cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) and 1F and 3R primers (3.2 pmol). Then, the sequencing reaction mixtures were analyzed using an ABI PRISM 3500 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s protocols to obtain DNA sequences of the 16S rRNA gene. The sequences obtained were compared with those deposited in the Genbank database using the online software BLAST. Sequence alignment and construction of the phylogenetic tree were performed using MEGA version 5.05.
Plant growth test
We cultured the 30 selected isolates in 20 ml NFb broth medium at 28 °C for 2 days. To eliminate the effects of indigenous soil microorganisms, Honmachi paddy soil was sterilized by gamma radiation at 50 kGy at the Takasaki institute of Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA). Consequently, the soils were sterilized by a dose of 100 kGy to kill all microorganisms. Seeds of rice (cv. Leaf star) were surface-sterilized as described above. The two germinated seeds were transplanted into 300-ml plastic pots containing 200 g soil gamma-irradiated soils, and then 0.75 ml of each bacterial culture at a cell density of 109 colony forming unit /ml (CFU/ml) was applied to a seed in the pot. All pots were transferred to a greenhouse controlled at 28 °C ± 2 °C during the day (16 h) and 25 °C ± 2 °C during the night (8 h). Each pot was irrigated with sterilized distilled water. The experiment was performed in a completely randomized block design that consisted of three replicates for each treatment. Plants un-inoculated and inoculated with Azosperillum brasilense (Ts-13) were used as negative and positive controls, respectively (Meunchang et al. 2004). Plants were harvested after 3 weeks, and the roots were washed thoroughly in tap water to remove adhering soil. The fresh weight of roots and shoots was recorded, and then the roots and shoots were dried at 60 °C for 2 days before determining dry weight. The statistical significance of differences between treatments and controls was determined using Tukey’s test (P < 0.05) (Table 4).
Acetylene reduction assay of rhizosphere soils from inoculated rice seedlings
To measure the acetylene reduction activity of rhizosphere soil, 10 g soil from the rhizosphere of 21-day-old rice plants was placed in a sterilized vial, and the headspace was filled with 10 % acetylene gas (v/v). The vials containing 10 % acetylene were incubated at 28 °C for 24 h. Then, 1 ml air from the headspace of the vial was removed using a gas-syringe and injected to a GC8A gas chromatograph (Shimadzu) to analyze ethylene content. The rhizosphere soil from an un-inoculated plant was used as the control.
Results
Isolation of PGPR
We used rhizosphere soils from seven different plants as inoculants to isolate PGPR associated with rice plants, as shown in Fig. 1. We obtained a total of 166 isolates; 88 isolates were obtained from rice leaves and 78 were obtained from rice roots (Table 1).
Colony morphology of isolates
First, we evaluated the 166 isolates in terms of colony morphology and color, to determine whether there were morphological differences among isolates in rhizosphere soils from different plants. The results are shown in Table 2. The majority of the isolates (>80 %) from alluvial soil (rice rhizosphere soil) and Andosol (rhizosphere soils from the six other crops) formed circular colonies. Among the isolates from alluvial soil, 16.7 % formed filamentous or irregular colonies. The Andosol soils from the six different crops showed a wide variation in the proportion of isolates forming filamentous or irregular colonies, ranging from 0 % (sweet potato and crabgrass rhizosphere soil) to 15.2 % (maize rhizosphere soil). In terms of colony color, 16.7 % of isolates from alluvial soil formed creamy colonies, 16.7 % formed transparent colonies, 16.7 % formed whitish colonies, and 50 % formed yellowish colonies. Among the isolates from Andosol soils, the most common colony colors were whitish (ranging from 12.0 % of isolates from wheat rhizosphere soil to 57.5 % of isolates from maize rhizosphere soil) and yellowish (ranging from 30.3 % of isolates from maize rhizosphere soil to 76.0 % of isolates from wheat rhizosphere soil). The majority of isolates, regardless of whether they were from alluvial or Andosol soils, formed raised colonies. Also, the majority of isolates from both soil types formed colonies with entire margins.
Physiological properties of isolates
Next, we evaluated the abilities of the isolates to produce IAA, to reduce acetylene, and to solubilize P. The ability to produce IAA is associated with plant growth-promoting activity, the ability to reduce acetylene indicates nitrogen-fixation activity, and the ability to dissolve calcium phosphate indicates that the isolate can provide P nutrition to its host plant. These tests were used to evaluate the potential of the isolates for use as biofertilizers. The frequencies of isolates in each soil type that were able to produce IAA are shown in Fig. 2a. Of the 166 isolates, 115 were able to produce IAA. The amount of IAA produced by individual isolates ranged from 0.04 to 231 μg L−1 (Table 3). Among isolates from sweet potato rhizosphere soil, 92.3 % were able to produce IAA. Among those from crabgrass and oat rhizosphere soils, at least 80 % were able to produce IAA. The JO32 isolate, which was derived from oat rhizosphere soil, produced the largest amount of IAA (231 μg L−1; Table 3). Among the other rhizosphere soils, at least 50 % of isolates were able to produce IAA.
Of the 166 isolates, 122 showed acetylene reduction activity (Fig. 2b). The ethylene production rates varied widely among individual isolates, ranging from 0.04 nmole C2H4 h−1 (106 cells)−1 to 528.1 nmole C2H4 h−1 (106 cells)−1 (Table 3). The majority of isolates (83.4 %) from rice rhizosphere soil showed nitrogen fixation activity (Fig. 2b). Similarly, the majority of isolates from Andosol rhizosphere soils showed nitrogen fixing activity, ranging from 63.7 % of isolates from maize rhizosphere soil to 79.2 % of isolates from rye grass rhizosphere soil. The JR5 strain associated with rice roots in rice rhizosphere soil showed the highest activity in the in vitro ARA [528.1 nmole C2H4 h−1 (106 cells)−1; Table 3].
We evaluated the P-solubilization abilities of the 166 isolates, and found that only 36 isolates formed clear zones in the plate assay. Therefore, among all the isolates, 115 (69 % of the total) were able to produce IAA, 122 (73 % of the total) showed nitrogen fixing activity, but only 36 (21.6 %) were able to solubilize P. The highest frequency of P-solubilizing strains (40 % of isolates) was in maize rhizosphere soil (Andosol). The JR 37 strain associated with rice roots in rice rhizosphere soil showed the strongest P-solubilizing activity, which was observed as the largest clear zone in the plate assay (Table 3). Less than 10 % of the isolates from rhizosphere soils from oat and crabgrass, and none of those sweet potato rhizosphere soil, showed P-solubilization activity.
Genetic characterization of representative isolates based on 16S rRNA sequence
We selected 30 of the 166 isolates for 16S rRNA sequence analysis. The isolates were selected based on the type of rhizosphere soil they were derived from, their IAA production activity, and their acetylene reduction activity. We obtained almost complete sequences of the 16S rRNA gene for these isolates. The closest relative of each isolate, based on its 16S rRNA sequence, and its IAA production activity, acetylene reduction activity, and P-solubilizing activity, are shown in Table 3. The phylogenetic relatedness among the 30 representative isolates is shown in Fig. 3. There were clear differences in the distribution of bacterial genera between the two soil types (Andosol and alluvial soil). Among the Andosol soils, those from rhizospheres of five crops (all except ryegrass) contained isolates belonging to the genus Enterobacter and close relatives (Table 3, Fig. 3). Approximately 50 % of the isolates from these soils were in the genus Enterobacter. In contrast, the rice rhizosphere soil (alluvial soil) did not contain any Enterobacter isolates. Similarly, wheat and oat rhizosphere soils contained isolates in the genus Klebsiella and its close relatives, while rice rhizosphere soil did not contain any isolates in this genus. We obtained four Pseudomonas isolates; three were from maize and wheat rhizosphere soils, and one was from rice rhizosphere soil. The four Pseudomonas isolates represented different species; Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas monteilii (JW13), Pseudomonas veronii (JR37), and Pseudomonas mandelii (JRy205) (Table 3, Fig. 3). The latter three species have not been reported to be associated with rice plants previously. Both P. monteilii and P. mandelii showed acetylene reduction activity (Table 3), but neither have been reported to have nitrogen fixation activity in previous studies. We detected a strain of Stenotrophomonas, JR207, only in rice rhizosphere alluvial soil. We detected four Bacillus isolates; two strains of Bacillus altitudinis were obtained from rice rhizosphere alluvial soil, one strain of Bacillus pumilus was obtained from maize rhizosphere soil (Andosol), and one strain of Bacillus safensis was obtained from crabgrass rhizosphere soil (Andosol) (Table 3, Fig. 3). One of the B. altitudinis strains, JR198, showed nitrogen-fixing activity (Table 3). This is the first report that B. altitudinis can be associated with rice plants and fix nitrogen. The Caulobacter henricii strain JO126 was unique to oat rhizosphere soil, and to our knowledge this is the first report of such species from rice. Interestingly, the acetylene reduction activity of the Rhizobium daejeonense strain JR5 was 240 times higher than that of another Rhizobium strain, JO171 (Table 3, Fig. 3).
Effects of bacterial inoculation on rice plant growth
To ensure the effects of inoculation on plant growth and nitrogen fixing activity to rice plants, the 30 representative isolates were inoculated at the gamma-sterilized paddy soil. We also included a positive control in these experiments, the Ts-13 strain of Azospirillum brasilense, which is used as a biofertilizer for rice crops in Thailand (Meunchang et al. 2004).
All of the 30 tested isolates positively affected rice shoot length, compared with that of the control. The shoot lengths of inoculated plants compared with those of un-inoculated controls, are shown in Table 4. The shoot length of rice plants inoculated with JRy205, derived from ryegrass rhizosphere soil, was 116 % that of the control, and that of rice plants inoculated with Pseudomonas monteilii (JW13), derived from wheat rhizosphere soil, was 149 % that of the control. However, none of these differences are statistically significant. All of the isolates also had a positive effect on root length. The statistically significant increases in root length (P < 0.05), compared with that of the un-inoculated control, were in rice plants inoculated with JW2 [Raoultella (Klebsiella) ornithinolytica], JW13 (P. monteilii), JM52 (B. pumilus), and JO32 (Enterobacter sp.).
We determined the effects of the isolates on rice dry weight, and found that 29 of the 30 isolates showed positive effects. Only the Rhizobium strain JO171 isolated from oat rhizosphere soil did not affect rice dry weight (Table 4). Statistically significant increases in shoot dry weight (P < 0.05), compared with that of the un-inoculated control, were observed in plants inoculated with JM52 (B. pumilus), JW69 (Enterobacter asburiae), JW13 (P. monteilii), and JR5 (R. daejeonense). All of the isolates positively affected root dry weight (Table 4). Out of the 30 isolates, 22 isolates (73 % of the total) resulted in root dry weights of 150 % or higher, compared with that of un-inoculated controls. The strains that resulted in statistically significant (P < 0.05) increases in rice root dry weight, compared with that of the control, were JW13 (P. monteilii), which was derived from wheat rhizosphere soil, and JR198 (B. altitudinis), which was derived from rice rhizosphere soil. These strains resulted in root lengths approximately 300 % of that of the un-inoculated control.
We determined the acetylene reduction activities of rhizospheric soils of rice after inoculating each of the 30 isolates. Seven isolates showed no acetylene reduction activity in soil, even though they had previously shown acetylene reduction activity in the in vitro assay (Table 3). However, surprisingly, JO32 (Enterobacter sp.) showed rhizospheric acetylene reduction activity (Table 4). The R. daejeonense strain JR5, which was obtained from rice rhizosphere soil, showed the highest acetylene reduction activity in the in vitro assay (Table 3), but showed much lower activity in rhizosphere soil (49 nmol C2H4/h/10 g soil). The P. veronii strain JR37 showed the highest rhizospheric acetylene reduction activity among the 30 isolates tested.
We analyzed the relationship between plant growth promoting effects and rhizospheric nitrogen-fixation ability. The A. tumefaciens strains JM51, JM158, and JR172, the S. rhizophila strain JR207, and the B. altitudinis strain JR198 showed no acetylene reduction activity in either test (Tables 3 and 4), but all of those isolates strongly promoted root and shoot growth of rice. As shown in Table 3, all of those isolates were able to produce IAA. The isolates that resulted in rice shoot and root growth of more than 150 %, compared with that of un-inoculated controls, were as follows: from maize rhizosphere soil, JM195 (Enterobacter sp.), JM63 (E. ludwigii), JM75 (P. putida), JM52 (B. pumilus); from wheat rhizosphere soil, JW2 and JW40 (R. ornithinolytica), JW191 (E. ludwigii), JW69 (E. asburiae), JW13 (P. monteilii); and from rice rhizosphere soil, JR207 (S. rhizophila), JR5 (R. daejeonense), JR172 (A. tumefaciens), JR37 (P. veronii), and JR198 (B. altitudinis).
Discussion
In this study, we isolated bacterial strains from rhizosphere of different plants, and evaluated their potential as PGPR for rice. In general, we expected that PGPR isolated from rice rhizosphere soil would perform better than those isolated from rhizosphere soils of different plants, because these bacteria would be adapted to the rice rhizosphere. However, we also tested the potential of bacteria obtained from other hosts as PGPR for rice, and found several PGPR that promoted rice growth.
There were no clear differences in the trends in colony morphology of isolates among the seven different rhizosphere soils. However, the frequencies of colony colors differed slightly among the different rhizosphere soils. In case of the isolates obtained from the rhizosphere of sweet potato, 46.1 % of the isolates were whitish and the remaining isolates showed yellowish colonies, whereas in case of the isolates obtained from the rhizosphere of wheat, 12.0 % of the isolates had whitish colonies and 76.0 % yellowish. The reasons for the different frequencies of bacterial colony colors among rhizosphere soils are unknown.
We evaluated the ability of the 166 isolates to produce IAA. Most of the isolates from sweet potato rhizosphere soil (92.3 %) and from crabgrass rhizosphere soil (82 %) were able to produce IAA. Approximately 60 % of the isolates from the rhizosphere soils of maize, wheat, and rice were able to produce IAA (Fig. 2). Sweet potato and crabgrass can grow in soils with low fertility. This may be related to the ability of their rhizospheric bacteria to produce IAA. Yoshida and Ancajas (1971) was the first to discover nitrogen fixation in the rice rhizosphere. Later, Watanabe and Furusaka (1980) reported that many kinds of nitrogen fixing bacteria are distributed in the rice rhizosphere. In our experiments, 83.4 % of bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere soil of rice showed nitrogen-fixing abilities; this was the highest proportion of nitrogen-fixing bacteria among the seven rhizosphere soils. This finding implied that the rice rhizosphere is the most suitable environment for nitrogen fixation; however, approximately 60 %–80 % of isolates from rhizosphere soils of other plants also showed nitrogen-fixing abilities. Phosphorus is one of the most important plant nutrients, and there are limited natural resources suitable for producing phosphate fertilizers. Therefore, the P-solubilization ability of PGPR is one of the most important traits, since it means they can supply phosphorous nutrition to crops. Common genera of phosphate solubilizing bacteria include Achromobacter, Agrobacterium, Bacillus, Enterobacter, Erwinia, Escherichia, Flavobacterium, Mycobacterium, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Burkholderia, Microccocus, Aereobacter, Erwinia, and Serratia (Sashidhar and Podile 2010). In our assay, only 21.6 % of isolates showed phosphate-solubilizing activity (Fig. 2), while 78.4 % of isolates showed IAA production and nitrogen fixation abilities. None of the isolates from rhizosphere soil of sweet potato, and few of those isolated from oat and crabgrass rhizosphere soil, were able to solubilize phosphate. The attributes of these rhizospheric bacteria may affect the nutrient uptake abilities of oat and crabgrass. However, further research is required to explore the relationships between the nutrient uptake patterns of these hosts (oat and crabgrass) and their rhizospheric bacteria. These results indicate that the best strategy to select isolates with all three plant-growth-promoting traits (IAA production, nitrogen fixing activity, and phosphate solubilizing activity), is to screen for phosphate solubilizing activity first.
We chose 30 isolates for genetic analysis. The isolates were selected based on differences in the rhizospheres they were derived from, their ability to produce IAA, and their ability to fix nitrogen. There was a clear difference in Enterobacter distribution between Saiwai-Cho upland fields (Andosol) and Honmachi paddy field soil (alluvial soil) (Table 3). Of the 24 isolates obtained from crops grown in the Saiwai-Cho upland fields, 12 isolates were Enterobacter strains, whereas no Enterobacter isolates were obtained from the Honmachi paddy soil. Enterobacter species have been isolated from various crops such as cotton and sweet corn (Mcinroy and Kloepper 1995), rice (Mehnaz et al. 2001), sugarcane (Mirza et al. 2001), sunflower (Ambrosini et al. 2012), pine (Ribeiro and Cardoso 2012), and maize (Morales-Garcia et al. 2011). Therefore, the wide distribution of Enterobacter strains in rhizosphere soils in the Saiwai-Cho upland field may indicate that the members of this genus are dominant bacteria in the rhizospheres of diverse crops. The farmyard manure was applied at a rate of 10 tonnes per hectare per year to these two fields. In Saiwai-Cho upland field soil, this management practices may promote distribution of Enterobacter species. In paddy field soil, the management practices may result in an environment that is unsuitable for Enterobacter sp.
Bacillus species are common rhizospheric bacteria, and have been isolated from rhizospheres of different agricultural crops such as rice (Xie et al. 2003; Beneduzi et al. 2008b), wheat (Beneduzi et al. 2008a), and soybean (Park et al. 2005). There are several reports of Bacillus isolates that can fix nitrogen, produce plant hormones, and solubilize phosphate. We isolated four Bacillus strains, two of which were strains of B. altitudinis. This is the first report of this bacterium associating with rice roots and fixing nitrogen. Of the B. altitudinis isolates, JR4 showed nitrogen-fixing activity both in the in vitro assay and in vivo after inoculating rice plants. However, JR198 did not show nitrogen-fixation activity. The reason why nitrogen fixation activity is so variable among different strains of B. altitudinis is unknown.
There are contradictory reports about the ability of free-living Rhizobia to fix nitrogen. Alazard (1990) reported that a strain of Rhizobium was able to fix nitrogen under free-living conditions, whereas Chowdhury et al. (2007) reported that two free-living strains of Rhizobium isolated from Lasiurus sindicus could not fix nitrogen. In our assay, a Rhizobium strain isolated from the rice rhizosphere, JR5 (R. daejeonense) showed the highest acetylene reducing activity (528.1 nmol C2H4/h/106 cells) in the in vitro assay. Quan et al. (2005) reported that this species contained the nifH gene but formed ineffective nodules on roots of Medicago sativa. Therefore, this is the first report that the JR5 strain of R. daejeonense shows nitrogen fixing activity both in an in vitro assay and in vivo after inoculation onto rice roots (Tables 3 and 4). While JR5 showed the highest acetylene reducing activity in the in vitro assay, it was ranked 8th out of the 30 isolates in terms of in vivo acetylene reducing activity. Therefore, the acetylene reducing activity determined in vitro does not necessarily correlate with that in vivo. Further research is required to explore the reasons for this difference and to identify the factors that affect nitrogen-fixing ability in vivo. Pseudomonas species are common soil bacteria, and they have been well studied in terms of their plant growth-promoting activity (Vessey 2003), phosphate solubilizing activity (Naik et al. 2008), and nitrogen fixing activity (Hatayama et al. 2005). Three out of the four Pseudomonas isolated in this study (JW13, P. monteilii; JR37, P. veronii; JRy205, P. mandelii; Table 3 and 4) had not been reported to be associated with rice previously. Also, this is the first report of acetylene reducing activity in P. monteilii and P. mandelii.
In this study, we used rhizosphere soils from seven different crops to inoculate rice plants, and then isolated bacteria from the shoots and roots of the rice plants after 3 weeks of growth. Then, we conducted genetic and physiological analyses to characterize the isolates to evaluate their potential as PGPR for rice plants. We identified some isolates that showed potential as PGPR for rice: the B. altitudinis strain JR198 and the R. daejeonense strain JR5, which were derived from rice rhizosphere soil; the P. monteilii strain JW13 and the E. cloacae strain JW69, which were derived from wheat rhizosphere soil; and the B. pumilus strain JM52, which was derived from maize rhizosphere soil. Therefore, these methods are very effective for isolating and identifying candidates for development of biofertilizers for target crops.
Abbreviations
- PGPR:
-
Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria
- IAA:
-
Indole-3-acetic acid
- ARA:
-
Acetylene reduction assay
- DNA:
-
Deoxyribonucleic acid
- CTAB:
-
Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide
- PCR:
-
Polymerase chain reaction
- DDBJ:
-
DNA data bank Japan
- BLAST:
-
Basic local alignment search tool
- JAEA:
-
Japan Atomic Energy Agency
- CRD:
-
Randomized block design
References
Ahmad F, Ahmad I, Khan MS (2008) Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities. Microbiol Res 163:173–181
Alazard D (1990) Nitrogen fixation in pure culture by rhizobia isolated from stem nodules of tropical Aeschynomene species. FEMS Microbiol 68:177–182
Ambrosini A, Beneduzi A, Stefanski T, Pinheiro FG, Vargas LK, Passaglia LM (2012) Screening of plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria isolated from sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Plant Soil 356:245–264. doi:10.1007/s11104-011-1079-1
Beneduzi A, Peres D, Costa PB, Zanettini MH, Passaglia LM (2008a) Genetic and phenotypic diversity of plant-growth-promoting bacilli isolated from wheat fields in southern Brazil. Res Microbiol 159:244–250. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2008.03.003
Beneduzi A, Peres D, Vargas LK, Bodanese-Zanettini MH, Passaglia LM (2008b) Evaluation of genetic diversity and plant growth promoting activities of nitrogen-fixing bacilli isolated from rice fields in South Brazil. Appl Soil Ecol 39:311–320. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.01.006
Bent E, Tuzun S, Chanway PC, Eneback S (2001) Alterations in plant growth and in root hormone levels of lodgepole pines inoculated with rhizobacteria. Can J Microbiol 47:793–800
Boddey RM, Dobereiner J (1988) Nitrogen fixation associated with grasses and cereals: recent results and perspectives for future research. Plant Soil 108:53–65
Campbell CD, Grayston SJ, Hirst DJ (1997) Use of rhizosphere carbon sources in sole carbon source tests to discriminate soil microbial communities. J Microbiol Methods 30:33–41
Chabot R, Anton H, Cescas MC (1996) Growth promotion of maize and lettuce by phosphate-solubilizing Rhizobium Leguminosarum biovar phaseoli. Plant Soil 184:311–321
Choudhary DK, Johri BN (2009) Interactions of Bacillus spp. and plants – with special reference to induced systemic resistance (ISR). Microbiol Res 164:493–513
Chowdhury SP, Schmid M, Hartmann A, Tripathi AK (2007) Identification of diazotrophs in the culturable bacterial community associated with roots of Lasiurus sindicus, a perennial grass of Thar Desert, India. Microb Ecol 54:82–90. doi:10.1016/j.micres.2008.08.007
Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, Clement C, Barka E (2005) Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4951–4959. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.9.4951-4959.2005
Döbereiner J, Marriel IE, Nery M (1976) Ecological distribution of Spirillum lipoferum Beijerinck. Can J Microbiol 22:1464–1473
Duan J, Muller KM, Charles TC, Vesely S, Glick BR (2009) 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase genes in rhizobia from Southern Saskatchewan. Microb Ecol 57:423–436. doi:10.1007/s00248-008-9407-6
Glickmann E, Dessaux Y (1995) A critical examination of the specificity of the Salkowski Reagent for indolic compounds produced by phytopathogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:793–796
Gray EJ, Smith DL (2005) Intracellular and extracellular PGPR: commonalities and distinctions in the plant-bacterium signaling processes. Soil Biol Biochem 37:395–412. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.08.030
Grayston SJ, Wang S, Campbell CD, Edwards AC (1998) Selective influence of plant species on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem 30:369–378
Hatayama K, Kawai S, Shoun H, Ueda Y, Nakamura K (2005) Pseudomonas azotifigens sp. nov., a novel nitrogen-fixing bacterium isolated from a compost pile. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:1539–1544. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.63586-0
Hinsinger P, Bengough AG, Vettrlein D, Young IM (2009) Rhizosphere: biophysics, biogeochemistry and ecological relevance. Plant Soil 321:117–152. doi:10.1007/s11104-008-9885-9
Hurek T, Reinhold-Hurek B (2003) Azoarcus spp. strain BH72 as a model for nitrogen fixing grass endophytes. J Biotechnol 106:169–178. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2003.07.010
Isawa T, Yasuda M, Awazaki H, Minamisawa K, Shinozaki S, Hakashita H (2010) Azospirillum sp. Strain B510 enhances rice growth and yield. Microbes Environ 25:58–61. doi:10.1264/jsme2.ME09174
Kloepper JW, Schroth MN (1978) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on radishes. Fourth International Conference on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, Angers, France 2:879–882
Kuske CR, Ticknor LO, Miller ME, Dunbar JM, Davis JA, Barns SM, Belnap J (2002) Comparison of soil bacterial communities in rhizospheres of three plant species and the interspaces in an arid grassland. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:1854–1863. doi:10.1128/AEM.68.4.2002
Lupwayi NZ, Rice WA, Clayton GW (1998) Soil microbial diversity and community structure under wheat as influenced by tillage and crop rotation. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1733–1741
Mcinroy JA, Kloepper JW (1995) Survey of indigenous bacterial endophytes from cotton and sweet corn. Plant Soil 173:337–342
Mehnaz S, Mirza MS, Haurat J, Bally R, Normand P, Bano A, Malik KA (2001) Isolation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis of the beneficial bacteria from the rhizosphere of rice. Can J Microbiol 47:110–117. doi:10.1139/cjm-47-2-110
Meunchang S, Panichsakpatana S, Yokoyama T (2004) Phylogenetic and physiological characterization of indigenous Azospirillum isolates in Thailand. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 50:413–421
Mirza MS, Ahmad W, Latif F, Haurat J, Bally R, Normand KP, Malik A (2001) Isolation, partial characterization, and the effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) on micro-propagated sugarcane in vitro. Plant Soil 237:47–54
Morales-Garcia YE, Juarez-Hernandez D, Mascarua-Esparzam MA, Bustillos-Cristales MR, Fuentes-Ramirez LE, Martinez-Contreras RD, Munoz-Rojas J (2011) Growth response of maize plantlets inoculated with Enterobacter spp., as a model for alternative agriculture. Rev Argent Microbiol 43:287–293
Naik PR, Raman G, Narayanan KB, Sakthivel N (2008) Assessment of genetic and functional diversity of phosphate solubilizing fluorescent pseudomonads isolated from rhizospheric soil. BMC Microbiol 8:230. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-8-230
Ohyama T, Yokoyama T, Narumi I et al (2006) Biofertilizer manual. Japan Atomic Industrial Forum (JAIF), Tokyo, Japan
Park M, Kim C, Yang J, Lee H, Shin W, Kim S, Sa T (2005) Isolation and characterization of diazotrophic growth promoting bacteria from rhizosphere of agricultural crops of Korea. Microbiol Res 160:127–133. doi:10.1016/j.micres.2004.10.003
Pikovskaia RI (1948) Metabolisation of phosphorus in soil in connection with vital activity of some microbial species. Microbiologiya 17:362–370
Prescott L, Harely J, Klein DA (1990) Microbiology. McGraw-Hill, Boston, USA
Quan ZH, Bae HS, Baek JH, Chen WF, Im WT, Lee ST (2005) Rhizobium daejeonense sp. nov. isolated from a cyanide treatment bioreactor. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:2543–2549. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.63667-0
Reyes I, Bernier L, Antoun H (2002) Rock phosphate solubilization and colonization of maize rhizosphere by wild and genetically modified strains of Penicillium rugulosum. Microb Ecol 44:39–48. doi:10.1007/ s00248-002-1001-8
Ribeiro CM, Cardoso EJ (2012) Isolation, selection and characterization of root-associated growth promoting bacteria in Brazil Pine (Araucaria angustifolia). Microbiol Res 167:69–78. doi:10.1016/j.micres.2011.03.003
Romero D, de Vicente A, Rakotoaly RH, Dufour SE, Veening JW, Arrebola E, Cazorla FM, Kuipers OP, Paquot M, Perez-Garcia A (2007) The iturin and fengycin families of lipopeptides are key factors in antagonism of Bacillus subtilis toward Podosphaera fusca. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 20:430–440. doi:10.1094/MPMI-20-4-0430
Sashidhar B, Podile AR (2010) Mineral phosphate solubilization by rhizosphere bacteria and scope for manipulation of the direct oxidation pathway involving glucose dehydrogenase. J Appl Microbiol 109:1–12. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04654.x
Schmidt CS, Alavi M, Cardinale M, Muller H, Berg G (2012) Stenotrophomonas rhizophila DSM14405T promotes plant growth probably by altering fungal communities in the rhizosphere. Biol Fertil Soils 48:947–960
Söderberg KH, Olsson PA, Bååth E (2002) Structure and activity of the bacterial community in the rhizosphere of different plant species and the effect of Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonisation. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 40:223–231
Tripathi AK, Verma SC, Ron EZ (2002) Molecular characterization of a salt-tolerant bacterial community in the rice rhizosphere. Res Microbiol 153:579–584
Vessey JK (2003) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil 255:571–586
Watanabe I, Furusaka C (1980) Microbial ecology of flooded rice soils. Adv Microb Ecol 4:125–168
Wieland G, Neumann R, Backhaus H (2001) Variation of microbial communities in soil, rhizosphere, and rhizoplane in response to crop species, soil type, and crop development. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:5849–5854. doi:10.1128/AEM.67.12.5849-5854.2001
Xie GH, Cai MY, Tao GC, Steinberger Y (2003) Cultivable heterotrophic N2-fixing bacterial diversity in rice fields in the Yangtze River Plain. Biol Fertil Soils 37:29–38. doi:10.1007/s00374-002-0565-2
Yokoyama T (2008) Flavonoid-responsive nodY-lacZ expression in three phylogenetically different Bradyrhizobium groups. Can J Microbiol 54:401–410
Yokoyama T, Ando S, Murakami T, Imai H (1996) Genetic variability of the common nod gene in soybean bradyrhizobia isolated in Thailand and Japan. Can J Microbiol 42:1209–1218. doi:10.1139/m96-156
Yoshida T, Ancajas RR (1971) Nitrogen fixation by bacteria in the root zone of rice. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 35:156–158
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Special Research Fund of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan titled “Research and development of security and safe crop production to reconstruct agricultural lands in Fukushima prefecture based on novel techniques to remove radioactive compounds using advanced bio-fertilizer and plant protection strategies”. This work was also supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B):24380176 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Peter A.H. Bakker.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Habibi, S., Djedidi, S., Prongjunthuek, K. et al. Physiological and genetic characterization of rice nitrogen fixer PGPR isolated from rhizosphere soils of different crops. Plant Soil 379, 51–66 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2035-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2035-7