Abstract
There has been much debate whether computers can be responsible. This question is usually discussed in terms of personhood and personal characteristics, which a computer may or may not possess. If a computer fulfils the conditions required for agency or personhood, then it can be responsible; otherwise not. This paper suggests a different approach. An analysis of the concept of responsibility shows that it is a social construct of ascription which is only viable in certain social contexts and which serves particular social aims. If this is the main aspect of responsibility then the question whether computers can be responsible no longer hinges on the difficult problem of agency but on the possibly simpler question whether responsibility ascriptions to computers can fulfil social goals. The suggested solution to the question whether computers can be subjects of responsibility is the introduction of a new concept, called “quasi-responsibility” which will emphasise the social aim of responsibility ascription and which can be applied to computers.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
C. Allen. Calculated Morality: Ethical Computing in the Limit. In I. Smit, Iva and G.E. Lasker, editors, Cognitive, Emotive and Ethical Aspects of Decision Making and Human Action, Volume I, pp. 19–23, (Workshop Proceedings, Baden-Baden, 31.07.-01.08.2002), 2002
Allen C., Varner G., Zinser J. (2000) Prolegomena to Any Future Artificial Moral Agent. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12: 251–261
Allen C., Smit I., Wallach W. (2006) Artificial Morality: Top-Down, Bottom-Up, and Hybrid Approaches. Ethics and Information Technology 7(3): 149–135
Anonymous. Wearable Computers help Autistic Kids. [available: http://www.knowledgedock.com/pooled/articles/BF_NEWSART/view.asp?Q=BF_NEWSART_24460], accessed 09.11.2004, 2004a
Anonymous. Augmented Reality Technology Promises Breakthroughs In Education And Cognitive Potential. [available: http://www.newstarget.com/001618.html], accessed 09.11.2004, 2004b
Bayertz K. (1995) Eine kurze Geschichte der Herkunft der Verantwortung. In Bayertz K. (ed.), Verantwortung: Prinzip oder Problem? Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, pp. 3–71
Bechtel W. (1985) Attributing Responsibility to Computer Systems. Metaphilosophy 16(4): 296–305
Bierhoff H.W. (1995) Verantwortungsbereitschaft, Verantwortungsabwehr und Verantwortungszuschreibung - Sozialpsychologische Perspektiven. In Bayertz K. (ed.), Verantwortung: Prinzip oder Problem? Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, pp. 217 - 240
Birnbacher D. (1995) Grenzen der Verantwortung. In Bayertz K. (ed.), Verantwortung: Prinzip oder Problem? Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, pp. 143–183
Bloomfield B.P., Vurdubakis T. (2003) Imitation Games: Turing, Menard, Van Meegeren. Ethics and Information Technology 5(1): 27–38
Brooks R. (2002) Flesh and Machines: How Robots Will Change Us. Pantheon, New York
Cerqui D. (2002) The Future of Humankind in the Era of Human and Computer Hybridization: An Anthropological Analysis. Ethics and Information Technology 4(2): 101–108
Collste G. (2000a) The Internet-Doctor. In Collste G. (ed.), Ethics in the Age of Information Technology. Centre for Applied Ethics, Linköping pp. 119–129
Collste G. (2000b) Ethical Aspects of Decision Support Systems for Diabetes Care. In Collste G. (ed.), Ethics in the Age of Information Technology. Centre for Applied Ethics, Linköping pp. 181–194
De George R.T. (1999) Business Ethics. 5th edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
P. Fauconnet. La responsabilité: étude de sociologie. In M.␣Neuberg, editor, La responsabilité — questions philosophiques, pp. 141–152. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1997, (orig: 1928)
Fischer J.M. (1999) Recent Work on Moral Responsibility. Ethics 110(1): 93–139
Floridi L., Sanders J.W. (2004) On the Morality of Artificial Agents. Minds and Machine 14: 349–379
French P.A. (1992) Responsibility Matters, University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas
Hart H.L.A. (1968) Punishment and Responsibility - Essays in the Philosophy of Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford
Hausman D.M., McPherson M.S. (1996). Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge et al
Jonas H. (1984) Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M
D.G. Johnson Computer Systems: Moral Entities but not Moral Agents. Ethics and Information Technology, 2007 (this issue)
Johnson D.G., Powers T.M. (2005). Computer Systems and Responsibility: A Normative Look at Technological Complexity. Ethics and Information Technology 7(2): 99–107
D. Kairy. A Philadelphia Story. Legal Affairs May/June 2003
G. Korienek and W. Uzgalis. Adaptable Robots. Metaphilosophy (33:1/2) (Special Issue: Cyberphilosophy: The Intersection of Philosophy and Computing. Edited by J.H. Moor and T.W. Bynum), 83–97, 2002
Lewis H.D. (1991) Collective Responsibility In May L., Hoffman S. (eds.), Collective Responsibility: Fife Decades of Debate in Theoretical and Applied Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., Savage, Maryland, pp. 17–34
Lipinski T.A., Buchanan E., Britz J.J. (2002) Sticks and stones and words that harm: Liability vs. responsibility, section 230 and defamatory speech in cyberspace. Ethics and Information Technology 4(2): 143–158
Long R.T. (1999) The Irrelevance of Responsibility. In May L., Hoffman S. (eds.), Collective Responsibility: Fife Decades of Debate in Theoretical and Applied Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., Savage, Maryland, pp. 118 - 145
May L. (1992) Sharing Responsibility. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
L. May and S. Hoffman. editors, Collective Responsibility: Fife Decades of Debate in Theoretical and Applied Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., Savage, Maryland, 1991
Moore M.S. (1999) Causation and Responsibility. In Paul E.F., Miller F.D., Paul J. (eds.), Responsibility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge et al., pp. 1–51
Neuberg M. (1997) Introduction à “La responsabilité”. In Neuberg M. (ed.), La responsabilité - questions philosophiques. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, pp. 1–24
Nissenbaum H. (1995) Computing and Accountability. In Johnson D.G., Nissenbaum H. (eds.), Computers, Ethics & Social Values. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, pp. 526–538
E.F. Paul, F.D. Miller and J. Paul, editors. Responsibility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge et al., 1999
Picard R.W. (1997) Affective Computing. MIT Press, London, Cambridge Massachusetts
Ricoeur P. (1995) Le concept de responsabilité - Essai d’analyse sémantique. In Ricoeur P. (ed.), Le Juste. Editions Esprit, Paris
Ricoeur P. (1990) Soi-même comme un autre. Edition du Seuil, Paris
Ricoeur P. (1983) Tems et récit – 1. L’intrigue et le récit historique. Edition du Seuil, Paris
R. Scheines. Computation and Causation. Metaphilosophy (33:1/2), Special Issue: Cyberphilosophy: The Intersection of Philosophy and Computing. Edited by J.H. Moor and T.W. Bynum: 158–180, (2002)
M. Schlick. Quand sommes-nous responsable? In M. Neuberg, editor, La responsabilité – questions philosophiques, pp. 27–38. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1997, (orig: 1930)
Sherman N. (1999) Taking Responsibility for our Emotions. In Paul E.F., Miller F.D., Paul J. (eds.), Responsibility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge et al., pp. 294 - 323
B.C. Stahl. Accountability and Reflective Responsibility in Information Systems. In C. Zielinski, P. Duquenoy and K. Kimppa, editors, The Information Society: Emerging Landscapes. pp. 51–68, (IFIP WG 9.2 proceedings) Springer, New York, 2006
Stahl B.C. (2004a). Responsible Management of Information Systems. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey
B.C. Stahl. Information, Ethics, and Computers: The Problem of Autonomous Moral Agents. Minds and Machines, 14: 67–83, 2004b
Trigeaud J.M. (1999). L’homme coupable - Critique d’une philosophie de la responsabilité. Editions Bière, Bordeaux
Velasquez M. (1991) Why Corporations Are Not Morally Responsible for Anything They Do. In May L., Hoffman S. (eds.), Collective Responsibility: Fife Decades of Debate in Theoretical and Applied Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., Savage, Maryland, pp. 111–131
R.J. Wallace. Responsibility and the Moral Sentiment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts/London, England (1996)
Weizenbaum J. (1976) Computer Power and Human Reason. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stahl, B.C. Responsible computers? A case for ascribing quasi-responsibility to computers independent of personhood or agency. Ethics Inf Technol 8, 205–213 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-9112-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-9112-4