Abstract
Urban areas often struggle with deteriorated water quality because of complex interactions between landscape factors and climatic variables. However, few studies have considered the effects of landscape variables on water quality at a sub-500-m scale. We conducted a spatial statistical analysis of six pollutants for 128 water quality stations in four watersheds around Portland, Oregon, using data from 2015 to 2021 for the wet season at two microscales (100 m and 250 m buffers). E. coli was associated with land cover, soil type, topography, and pipe length, while lead variations were best explained by topographic variables. Developed land cover and impervious surface explained variations in nitrate, while orthophosphate was associated with mean elevation. Models for zinc included land cover and topographic variables in addition to pipe length. Spatial regression models better explain variations in water quality than ordinary least squares models, indicating strong spatial autocorrelation for some variables. Our findings provide valuable insights to city planners and researchers seeking to improve water quality in metropolitan areas by manipulating city landscapes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Many studies have examined spatial relationships of water quality patterns and landscape or anthropogenic factors, concluding that the ability of landscape metrics to explain water quality depend largely on which spatial scale is used (Mainali et al., 2019). Mainali and Chang (2018) found that a 100-m scale and 1-km upstream scale best explained variations in water quality in a large river basin, while Shi et al. (2017) found varying abilities of catchment, riparian, and reach scales to explain degraded water quality (Mainali & Chang, 2018; Shi et al., 2017). However, relatively few studies have examined relationships between water quality and landscape variables at multiple microscales (smaller than a 500-m radius buffer) within an urbanized region. Given that the urban landscape is spatially heterogeneous (Cadenasso et al., 2007), water quality can exhibit a large spatial and temporal variation within a city (and even within a neighborhood). Thus, it is important to understand what microscale landscape factors are associated with the variations (Sliva & Dudley Williams, 2001).
Water quality is in part determined by the presence of physical pollutants, both aqueous and particulate (Lintern et al., 2018). Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a fecal coliform that inhabits the intestinal tract of animals and humans and commonly contaminates water sources in areas of high population density, thus posing significant public health risks in urbanized environments (Jang et al., 2017). A 2018 evaluation by the City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services concluded that E. coli is the main pollutant that exceeds water quality standards in Portland streams and rivers, with the highest recorded concentrations occurring in the summer and during storms. This report contrasts with McKee et al. (2020), whose study of recreational areas and the surrounding watershed in Atlanta, Georgia, found that E. coli concentrations were highest during the winter (McKee et al., 2020). Spatial differences were observed for concentrations of E. coli concentrations in Portland as well; concentrations were found to be “significantly lower in the Willamette Streams and Columbia Slough” than in most other watersheds sampled in the Portland area (Fish & Jordan, 2018). Accounting for “land use and stormwater management policies” helps to explain variations in fecal coliform levels at a multi-watershed scale in North Carolina (Vitro et al., 2017).
Phosphorus and nitrogen are organic nutrients that occur naturally in vegetation and soil, but excess amounts in water bodies can lead to eutrophication and subsequent water body impairment, among other ecosystem problems (Smith et al., 1999). Although phosphorus and nitrogen excesses commonly result from agricultural runoff, they are also important pollutants in urban environments (Billen & Garnier, 1997; Sonoda et al., 2001; Withers et al., 2014; Yu et al., 2012). For instance, urbanized watersheds in St. Paul, Minnesota, were found to experience major pollution from household nitrogen and phosphorus runoff (Hobbie et al., 2017). Furthermore, multiple studies have found that a lack of street sweeping for trees lining streets in urbanized areas greatly increases nitrogen and phosphorus loads in stormwater runoff (Taguchi et al., 2021). However, no previous studies examined the spatial variations in nutrient concentrations in relation to various microscale landscape factors with spatially intensive monitoring data.
This study examines relationships between water quality, anthropogenic and landscape factors, and seasonality at a microscale in Portland, Oregon, using a unique set of monitoring data. We address the following research questions:
-
1.
How do selected water quality parameter concentrations vary spatially between the wet and dry seasons? We expect that E. coli concentrations are likely to be highest in developed (including open and recreational) areas during the dry season, heavy metal concentrations are higher in the wet season for areas in close proximity to roads, and total suspended solids (TSS) concentrations are likely to be greatest in steep areas with high foot traffic.
-
2.
Which landscape variables explain spatial variations in water quality between the wet season? We expect that areas with larger percentages of sandy clay loam soil are likely to be negatively associated with pollutant concentrations and that total storm pipe length would be positively associated with pollutant concentrations. We anticipate that land cover variables such as imperviousness and road density are likely to be important explanatory variables of water quality in accordance with previous literature.
Materials and methods
Study area
This study was conducted in the metropolitan area of Portland, Oregon, a city that has recently undergone accelerated population growth and urbanization (Goodling et al., 2015; Jun, 2004). The region’s climate consists of relatively dry and warm summers and wet, cool winters. Average annual precipitation and temperature are approximately 965 mm and 12 °C, respectively (Chang, 2007; Cooley & Chang, 2017). Historical climate and future climate projections show increasing winter precipitation intensities with rising air temperatures (Cooley & Chang, 2021), likely to result in increased surface runoff, which can potentially decrease water quality.
Local soil types vary widely in texture between clay, silt, silt/loam, and gravel, creating a range of sizes that impact water infiltration flow rates (Baker et al., 2019). Most of Portland is in low-lying foothills situated between the Columbia and Willamette Rivers (O’Donnell et al., 2020). Forest Park, a largely undeveloped, slightly higher-elevation conservation area popular with hikers and bicyclists, comprises much of the western side of the study area. The Columbia Slough, a flat, low-elevation, slow-moving water body, comprises the northern side of the study area (Fig. 1). Many small urban streams have been heavily modified by human activities, resulting in rerouted, straightened, or buried streams (Post et al., 2022). Previous studies have found significant seasonal and spatial variability in water quality for Portland’s water bodies, including the Columbia and Buffalo Sloughs (Fish & Jordan, 2018; McCarthy, 2006). Zinc concentrations generally increase downstream of Johnson Creek, while lead concentrations do not show clear spatial patterns (Chang et al., 2019). While streams in Forest Park, Tryon Creek, and Johnson Creek are flash and fast-moving, flow in Columbia Slough is stagnant or slowly moving due to flat topography and wetlands.
Data
Water quality data were obtained from the City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services’ Portland Area Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Program (PAWMAP) (City of Portland, 2019). The data originated from 128 water quality monitoring stations located on the outskirts of the City of Portland (Fig. 1), situated within the Willamette River, Columbia Slough, Johnson Creek, and Balch Creek watersheds. Pollutant concentration data were collected according to the protocol developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) through the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (City of Portland, 2019; USEPA, 2019). Samples were analyzed in the City of Portland’s water chemistry laboratory following the standard USEPA methods for lead (EPA 200.8), zinc (EPA 200.8), nitrate (EPA 300.0), and orthophosphate (EPA 365.1). Standard Total Coliform Membrane Filter Procedure (SM9222G) was used for E. coli, and standard methods SM2540D (total suspended solids dried at 103–105 ˚C) was used for total suspended solids, respectively (Supplementary Table 2A).
Generally, water quality measurements were taken for at least one monitoring station at least once a month by the City of Portland from July 2015 through May 2021. The PAWMAP program routinely rotates active stations, which include 20 perennial and 12 intermittent stations; as such, the completeness of data varied, with some station records containing data for multiple years, and others for less than 1 year (City of Portland, 2019). Thus, we had to take into account the possibility of interannual variation when analyzing means for each station. Furthermore, no station data was documented from March through most of May of 2020, likely due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA in March 2020, which temporarily impeded field work (Oregon Department of Transportation, 2021).
Six water quality parameters representing physical, chemical, and biological importance were selected for this study: E. coli (MPN/100 mL), lead (ug/L), nitrate (mg/L), orthophosphate (mg/L), total suspended solids (TSS) (mg/L), and zinc (ug/L). Nitrate and orthophosphate were chosen because they were reported more frequently in the dataset compared to other measures of nitrogen and phosphorus. Most but not all data entries reported consistent detection limits for each pollutant; thus, majority detection limits are reported in Figs. 3 and 4 and Supplementary Table 2A, B. The data available to us measured E. coli directly as opposed to fecal coliform levels as a proxy, providing an uncommon opportunity to measure a water pollutant of direct relevance to human health (Vitro et al., 2017).
Explanatory spatial variables
Explanatory variables were chosen based on hypothesized relationships with water quality (Table 1). Using ESRI ArcGIS Desktop 10.8, we initially defined a circular buffer area of 100 m in diameter around each water quality station to derive explanatory variables (Table 1) (ESRI, 2021). We chose the 100-m distance to avoid spatial overlap in buffer area between stations that are in close proximity to one another, and the circular buffer area was deemed adequate because of the relatively flat, urban land cover of the areas surrounding the water quality stations. However, some explanatory variables, road length and pipe length, became insignificant at the 100-m scale. Therefore, we introduced a 250-m-diameter circular buffer scale, with the added benefit of allowing for a multiscalar analysis at the microscale by comparing the 100-m scale to the 250-m scale (Fig. 2).
We calculated all candidate explanatory variable measurements for each water quality station at the 250-m and 100-m buffer scales (pipe length was ultimately calculated only at the 250-m scale because of the lack of pipe presence at the 100-m scale). While it is more appropriate to use catchment scale in more natural settings, since our study region’s flow paths are heavily modified by anthropogenic activities such as storm pipes and disappeared streams (Post et al., 2022), we used circular buffers for our analysis. Also, PAWMAP sampling sites are found within areas with heterogeneous land cover, allowing for substantial variation in explanatory variable measurements. Strahler stream order was calculated using ArcGIS Hydrology tools in the Spatial Analyst toolkit (Horton, 1945; Strahler, 1952).
For land cover variables, we defined “developed” to be the total percentage of pixels classified as “Developed” by the NLCD land cover classification system, which included four categories of varying development intensities (i.e., amounts of impervious surface) (Dewitz & U.S. Geological Survey, 2021). Despite correlation between imperviousness and developed land cover types, we included both variables as candidate predictors because developed land encompassed a wide range of urban land use types. As shown in Supplementary Table 1, developed land areas include much of open and low-density developed areas, which can potentially function as a sink of pollutants as well as sources.
We defined wet season measurements as any data recorded in October through April, and dry season measurements as any data recorded in May through September, considering rainfall distribution in the study region (Chang et al., 2021). Mean pollutant concentrations for each station were calculated after we evaluated relative amounts of interannual variation in pollutant concentration for each station, which creates some inherent noise in our analysis (Supplementary Table 2). We only considered stations with at least three measurements taken in the duration of the study period, which consisted of 36 stations in the dry season and 128 stations in the wet season. Most of the eligible stations exhibited pollutant concentrations that were consistently high or low (i.e., standard deviation less than the mean for each pollutant for each station). Furthermore, most of the mean concentrations for each of these stations was above the detection limit for that pollutant. Only dry and wet season measurements for the 36 stations with at least three measurements for both seasons were analyzed for spatial variation in pollutants, excluding the other 92 eligible wet season stations for the purpose of direct seasonal comparison (Fig. 3a, b).
Statistical analysis
We used R version 4.1 to observe the distribution shape of pollutant concentrations across stations and produce pairwise correlation coefficients for explanatory and dependent variables. We tested the correlation between explanatory and dependent variables at the 95% confidence interval (RStudio Team, 2021). We used the Spearman rank correlation analysis for all correlation tests, to account for possible non-linear trends in water quality measurements (Shrestha & Kazama, 2007). We then generated heatmaps for each season at the 100-m and 250-m scales for visual comparison.
Because of the lack of data in the dry season, we only performed regression analysis for measurements taken in the wet season. Upon observing that the concentrations for E. coli, lead, nitrate, orthophosphate, TSS, and zinc were positively skewed, we applied the transformation log10(concentration + 1) to the original data when performing regression analysis. We introduced multiple linear regression to evaluate the influence of multiple landscape factors on each pollutant. To rule out autocorrelated explanatory variables when determining the model that best explains variations in pollutant concentrations, we employed the Exploratory Regression Tool in ArcMap. This geoprocessing tool takes a shapefile input and applies the Global Moran’s I spatial autocorrelation test to models that fit user-specified criteria (e.g., minimum R2 value and minimum Jarque–Bera p-value) to produce candidate ordinary least squares (OLS) models for analysis. For this preliminary step, we used the k-nearest neighbor’s approach with k = 8, the default value, to calculate spatial weights for Global Moran’s I. We recorded the “best model” for each pollutant in the wet season based on highest R2, lowest Akaike information criteria, and variation inflation factor (VIF) value less than 10 (Kutner et al., 2004).
We created a weights matrix for the wet season measurements (n = 128) in GeoDa using the distance band method and the software’s default bandwidth value. We input the best OLS model detected by exploratory regression into GeoDa 1.18.10’s Regression tool, running the tool twice more to incorporate the weights matrix for the spatial lag and spatial error models (Matthews, 2006). From the results output, we formatted the variable coefficients into multiple linear regression equations (Table 2).
Results
Spatial variations of pollutants
There were clear seasonal differences in mean pollutant concentrations across different regions in the study area when averaged across all measurements for each season. In both the wet and dry seasons, mean E. coli concentrations tended to be higher in Portland’s southern metropolitan area. However, the area around the Columbia Slough demonstrated higher E. coli concentrations in the dry season than in the wet season (Fig. 3a).
Lead concentrations tended to be high in the middle of the study area close to Interstate Highways 5 and 405, but more stations overall, exhibited higher concentrations in the wet season than in the dry season (Fig. 3a). Similar to lead, overall mean zinc concentrations were higher in the wet season, with the southern study area exhibiting the highest concentrations in both seasons (Fig. 3b).
Mean nitrate concentrations were consistently higher by the Columbia Slough and a small developed area directly east of the Willamette River in both seasons, although overall concentrations were higher in the wet season (Fig. 3a). Mean orthophosphate concentrations were highest in the dry season and were consistently high in the same area around the south part of the Willamette River in both seasons (Fig. 3b). There did not appear to be clear seasonal variation in TSS concentrations at the scale of the study area, although certain areas were consistently high in both seasons (Fig. 3b).
Correlation analysis
More variables were significantly correlated in the wet season than in the dry season. In the wet season at both scales, E. coli, followed by zinc, was associated with the highest number of explanatory variables at the 95% confidence level (Fig. 4a, c). The strongest correlations in the wet season occurred between E. coli and percent developed ( +), percent forested ( −), and percent imperviousness ( +) at both scales. Zinc was correlated most strongly with pipe length ( +), road length ( +), and percent developed ( +). Orthophosphate was most strongly correlated with pipe length ( +) and mean elevation ( −) at the 250-m scale in the wet season. Pipe length was positively associated with all dependent variables in the wet season except nitrate, which showed negative correlation, and TSS, which showed no significant correlation. Lead was only significantly correlated with road length and pipe length in the wet season, the latter only at the 250-m scale. Nitrate and TSS were barely correlated with any candidate predictors in the wet season.
Somewhat different explanatory variables were correlated with water quality parameters in the dry season than in the wet season. E. coli continued to demonstrate the highest number of significant associations with explanatory variables, while lead was negatively associated with mean slope and mean elevation, but the latter only at the 250-m scale (Fig. 4b, d). Orthophosphate was positively associated with percent forested and negatively associated with percent imperviousness at the 250-m scale. Pipe length and road length were less significant overall in the dry season than in the wet season, although zinc was still positively associated with pipe length. There were no significant correlations between explanatory variables and nitrate or TSS in the dry season.
Correlations between pollutants and explanatory variables did not necessarily increase at the 250-m scale compared to the 100-m scale. Slope and elevation measures became more significant at the 250-m scale, especially in the dry season. In the dry season, nitrate and TSS were significantly correlated with more variables at the 250-m scale than at the 100-m scale. In the wet season, orthophosphate was significantly correlated with more variables at the 250-m scale than at the 100-m scale.
Exploratory regression analysis
The model with the highest R2 value was produced for E. coli (Table 2). As demonstrated through the importance of spatial weights terms and improvements in R2 values and reductions in AIC values for the spatial error/spatial error models, E. coli concentrations exhibited a relatively low amount of spatial autocorrelation in the wet season (Table 2). Significant explanatory variables in the wet season were percent developed (250 m) ( +), standard deviation in slope (250 m) ( +), mean slope (250 m) ( −), stream order ( +), and percent soil group C (100 m) ( −) (Table 2). The E. coli model was the only model to include stream order as a significant explanatory variable.
Models for lead exhibited relatively high spatial autocorrelation in the wet season (Table 2). Pipe length ( +) was the most significant predictor of lead, followed by standard deviation in slope (250 m) ( +), mean slope (250 m) ( −), and mean elevation (100 m) ( +) (Table 2). R2 values were relatively low, indicating that most of the variation in lead concentration between water quality stations was unable to be explained using the chosen predictors.
Nitrate exhibited slightly lower spatial autocorrelation than lead, although like lead, models had relatively low R2 values (Table 2). All selected explanatory variables were significant at the 0.05 level for all models in both the wet and dry seasons. Significant explanatory variables were percent developed (250 m) ( −) and percent imperviousness (100 m) ( +) (Table 2). Orthophosphate demonstrated strong spatial autocorrelation, indicated by leading spatial terms, significant decreases in AIC values, and large increases in R2 values for the spatial lag/spatial error models (Table 2). Significant explanatory variables for the spatial lag and spatial error models at the 0.05 level were mean elevation (250 m) ( −) and standard deviation in elevation (100 m) ( +) (Table 2). Percent soil group C (100 m), standard deviation in elevation (250 m), and percent developed (250 m) became insignificant when the spatial models were applied, suggesting that these variables are highly spatially autocorrelated.
TSS models had low R2 values compared to models for other pollutants, but all selected explanatory variables were significant at the 95% confidence level and spatial autocorrelation was low (Table 2). Significant explanatory variables for spatial lag/spatial error models at the 95% confidence level were standard deviation in slope (100 m) ( −), pipe length ( +), and percent imperviousness (250 m) ( −) (Table 2). Standard deviation in slope at the 250-m scale ( +) was borderline significant for the spatial lag/spatial error models.
Models for zinc exhibited relatively strong spatial autocorrelation, with leading spatial terms, decreases in AIC values, and large increases in R2 values for the spatial lag and spatial error models (Table 2). Six explanatory variables best modeled zinc, more than for all other pollutants. Significant explanatory variables were percent developed (250 m) ( +), percent imperviousness (100 m) ( −), standard deviation in slope (250 m) ( +), mean slope (100 m) ( −), and pipe length ( +), the last of which bordered on insignificant for the spatial regression models. Percent soil group C became insignificant when spatial models were applied, suggesting that there is significant spatial autocorrelation attributable to this variable.
Discussion
Spatial and seasonal variation in water quality
E. coli
As averaged for each water quality station over the study period, E. coli concentrations were highest in the southern portion of the study area, which encompasses the Tryon Creek State Natural Area in addition to a number of Portland suburban neighborhoods, yet were comparatively low in many parts of the northwestern portion, which includes Forest Park, a natural area frequented by hikers and their pets (Fig. 3a, b). As such, E. coli contamination appears to be heterogeneous even across recreational areas within the same geographic locale, complicating our hypothesis that recreational areas in general will experience higher E. coli contamination than non-recreational areas. This unexpected pattern may result in part from the significance of slope variables and stream order in wet season E. coli models (Table 2). The negative association with mean slope and positive association with stream order in the wet season indicate that E. coli organisms tend to proliferate most in high-order, low-elevation streams during seasonal periods of increased streamflow. Positive associations with standard deviation of slope might relate to the formation of puddles that form in the wet season for areas with more irregular inclines and facilitate E. coli survival. E. coli exhibited higher concentrations in the dry season, which previous research has suggested is related to warmer summer temperatures that enable growth (Chen & Chang, 2014). However, a recent study of southern Oregon wetlands found that E. coli concentrations were much more associated with livestock grazing than with seasonality, which calls for an examination of whether increased outdoor recreation and animal activity in the summer months as opposed to inherent seasonal climatic variation predominantly influence seasonal variation in E. coli within Portland urban and suburban areas (Smalling et al., 2021).
Heavy metals
As hypothesized, both lead and zinc were positively associated with road length and pipe length negatively associated with mean slope, and positively associated with standard deviation in slope, complementing a recent Portland City report that heavy metal concentrations were correlated with each other in Portland area watersheds (Fish & Jordan, 2018). However, R2 values were relatively low, particularly for lead, raising further questions about the differences in landscape and anthropogenic factors that contribute to lead as opposed to zinc contamination in the study area (Ramirez et al., 2022). However, the same report noted that heavy metals were also correlated with total suspended solid concentrations. Pipe length and percent imperviousness are significant predictors for both lead and TSS in the wet season, similar to the findings of previous work that focused on Johnson Creek (Chang et al., 2019).
Despite previous literature tracing zinc to the deterioration of asphalt, car tires, and brake pads, road length was not included in models for zinc (Sörme & Lagerkvist, 2002). Other sources of zinc, such as industrial operations and galvanized building materials, have been found to be significant contributions to storm runoff and thus should be investigated as potential influencing factors in future studies (Brown & Peake, 2006; Sörme & Lagerkvist, 2002). These sources of zinc would occur in highly developed areas with anthropogenic activities, but not necessarily around roads and other areas of high impervious surface.
Nutrients
Developed area and impervious surface best explained variations in nitrate for both seasons, even as developed area was negatively associated and impervious surface positively associated with nitrate. This unexpected relationship with percent imperviousness and percent developed may result from the disproportionate placement of water quality monitoring stations in or near parks and other urban green spaces, which the NLCD land cover classification system nevertheless designates as “Developed-Open Space” for areas with less than 20% impervious surface (Dewitz & U.S. Geological Survey, 2021) (Supplementary Table 1). Low-intensity developed areas include open spaces, which may serve as nitrogen sinks with a buffering effect. At the same time, impervious surfaces such as urban and suburban roads and sidewalks facilitate increased nitrogen runoff despite lower densities of vegetation. Important nitrogen sources in urban areas include household fertilizer and dead leaves from urban street trees, as documented by previous studies (Hobbie et al., 2017; Taguchi et al., 2021).
The positive association of orthophosphate with developed area for the OLS model may relate to low-intensity developed areas serving as a source for phosphate from lawn fertilizer applications, while positive relationships with soil type C may have to do with low infiltration rates creating higher overland flow. However, soils in developed areas are spatially autocorrelated, causing them to become insignificant in spatial regression models. The lack of significant explanatory variables for spatial lag and spatial error models in either season indicates that there are factors unexplored in this analysis that affect phosphorus concentrations. Such factors might include high flow events and decreased drainage density, which was found to reduce nutrient runoff in urbanized watersheds (Pratt & Chang, 2012). For instance, decreased drainage density reduces nutrient runoff in urbanized watersheds, and locally, high phosphorus levels in Fanno Creek, on the outskirts of our study area, are known to increase total phosphorus concentrations during storms (Anderson & Rounds, 2002; Meierdiercks et al., 2017).
Total suspended solids (TSS)
TSS concentrations did not follow any clear spatial patterns between regions of the study area. However, there was a negative association between TSS and standard deviation in slope, indicating that unpaved areas with consistent inclines tend to have higher concentrations with TSS. This is consistent with our prediction that areas with high foot traffic have the greatest TSS concentrations, as less paved areas are more likely to deposit sediment. This result is further supported by Pratt and Chang’s findings that standard deviation of slope is negatively associated with total solids across seasons and scales for watersheds in the greater Portland, Oregon region (Pratt & Chang, 2012; You et al., 2019). Furthermore, Lintern et al.’s literature review also suggests a negative correlation of slope with TSS for developed areas (Lintern et al., 2018). The failure of spatial regression tools to find a model with adequate explanatory power for TSS suggests that analysis of TSS concentrations at this microscale may require including additional explanatory variables accounting for human activity—for instance, population density (Xu et al., 2021).
Predictive power of landscape variables
Percent developed, percent imperviousness, and percent forested had the highest Spearman correlation coefficients overall, emphasizing the importance of land cover on water quality variability even at the microscale. However, the spatial lag and spatial error models confirmed that percent imperviousness and percent developed were spatially autocorrelated, which decreased their explanatory power for orthophosphate in both seasons and zinc in the dry season. In the dry season at the 250-m scale, pipe length and road length exhibited high positive correlation with E. coli. Thus, it is interesting that road length was not a significant predictor of any pollutant in the spatial regression, although this could be due to correlations between pipe and road density ruling out road length as a predictor.
Hydrologic soil group C was negatively correlated with E. coli and TSS for the Spearman tests in the wet season. However, for all other spatial lag and spatial error models, soil group C was ruled out as a significant predictor when it was initially included in OLS models; in other words, soil group C is highly spatially autocorrelated within the study area, thus reducing our ability to assess the predictive power of hydrologic soil group using the assumptions of linear regression. Because hydrologic soil group C has “relatively high runoff potential” when wet, negative correlation with E. coli suggests that even relatively impermeable soil still serves a purpose in influencing E. coli concentrations (Phillips et al., 2019; USDA, 2007). Furthermore, soil is also a growth medium for E. coli under certain conditions and E. coli transport through soil is a function of soil water content (Byappanahalli & Fujioka, 1998; Dwivedi et al., 2016). Future studies evaluating the effects of hydrologic soil group on E. coli colony formation would benefit analysis in this regard.
Scale effects
The 250-m scale produced a higher number of significant correlations and higher correlation coefficients between water quality parameters and explanatory variables in both seasons, suggesting that a larger microscale is more indicative of water quality than a more immediate microscale, at least when using a circular buffer. Future studies could employ multiple riparian buffers to further compare spatial determinants of water quality across microscales (Pratt & Chang, 2012). Such studies should also calculate landscape fragmentation metrics using software such as FRAGSTATS (McGarigal & Marks, 1995) for more robust explanatory power (Chang et al., 2021; Fernandes et al., 2019).
Because we conducted analysis at the microscale, we were unable to incorporate sociodemographic factors as explanatory variables in our analysis of water quality. Another important next step of this research is to perform a multi-level analysis at the census block group scale to evaluate how income, race, education, and other socioeconomic variables are associated with water quality parameters at multiple spatial scales (Baker et al., 2019; Chan & Hopkins, 2017; Garcia-Cuerva et al., 2018).
Conclusions
Correlation and spatial regression analyses were conducted for samples of six pollutants originating from 128 water quality stations around the Portland, Oregon area, from 2015 to 2021. We examined the ability of various land cover, infrastructure, and soil and geomorphological factors to act as explanatory variables at the microscale between the wet and dry seasons. We found that there were seasonal and spatial differences in water quality parameters that can be attributed to differences in land use and land cover at the chosen scale, which were often associated in opposite directions from initial Spearman correlation coefficients. Using a distance band weights matrix, spatial lag and spatial error models best explain variations in water quality and uncovered strong spatial autocorrelation for hydrologic soil group C, imperviousness, and percent developed variables. E. coli was associated with land cover, soil group C, and topographic variables, while pipe length primarily explained variations in lead concentrations. Nitrate was primarily affected by percent developed area as well as impervious surface in both seasons. Spatial regression models for orthophosphate ruled out several strongly spatially autocorrelated predictors, though mean elevation maintained a negative association. Total suspended solids were also affected by topographic variables and pipe length. Models for zinc included topographic variables in the wet season and land cover variables in both seasons.
Unexpected relationships of imperviousness and developed area with pollutants might result from the large amount of urban green spaces in Portland, which we considered “developed” but with low amounts of impervious surface. To address this result, our methodology could be modified to better evaluate the effects of the amount of development on pollutant concentrations. Observations of the effects of hydrologic soil group C on water quality were limited by spatial autocorrelation that ruled out significance, although multiple OLS models included soil as a significant variable. By incorporating precipitation data and comparing other hydrologic soil groups in the future, we could better examine the effects of hydrologic soil groups on concentrations of E. coli and other pollutants.
Our research adds to the body of knowledge regarding local hydrology, urban infrastructure, and ecosystem services in Portland, Oregon. Facing unprecedented environmental and social challenges as a result of climate change, city planners hoping to improve water quality in metropolitan areas can utilize the findings of this study to better evaluate water pollution in a metropolitan city with. Researchers in the field can use findings from this study to understand how anthropogenic and natural variables interact to affect water quality across space and time.
Availability of data and materials
The data and materials used in analysis are available upon request from the corresponding author.
References
Anderson, C. W., & Rounds, S. A. (2002). Phosphorus and E. coli and their relation to selected constituents during storm runoff conditions in Fanno Creek, Oregon, 1998–99 (Report 02–4232; Water-Resources Investigations). USGS. https://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/wri024232/
Baker, A., Brenneman, E., Chang, H., McPhillips, L., & Matsler, M. (2019). Spatial analysis of landscape and sociodemographic factors associated with green stormwater infrastructure distribution in Baltimore, Maryland and Portland, Oregon. Science of the Total Environment, 664, 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.417
Billen, G., & Garnier, J. (1997). The Phison River plume: Coastal eutrophication in response to changes in land use and water management in the watershed. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 13(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame013003
Brabec, E., Schulte, S., & Richards, P. L. (2002). Impervious surfaces and water quality: A review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 16(4), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/088541202400903563
Brown, J. N., & Peake, B. M. (2006). Sources of heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban stormwater runoff. Science of the Total Environment, 359(1–3), 145–155.
Byappanahalli, M. N., & Fujioka, R. S. (1998). Evidence that tropical soil environment can support the growth of Escherichia coli. Water Science and Technology, 38(12), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00820-8
Cadenasso, M. L., Pickett, S. T., & Schwarz, K. (2007). Spatial heterogeneity in urban ecosystems: Reconceptualizing land cover and a framework for classification. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[80:SHIUER]2.0.CO;2
Chan, A. Y., & Hopkins, K. G. (2017). Associations between sociodemographics and green infrastructure placement in Portland, Oregon. Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment, 3(3), 05017002. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSWBAY.0000827
Chang, H. (2007). Streamflow characteristics in urbanizing basins in the Portland Metropolitan Area. Oregon, USA, Hydrological Processes, 21(2), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6233
Chang, H., Yasuyo, M., & Foster, E. (2021). Effects of land use change, wetland fragmentation, and best management practices on total suspended solids concentrations in an urbanizing Oregon watershed, USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 282, 111962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111962
Chang, H., Deonie, Morse, J., & Mainali, J. (2019) Sources of contaminated flood sediments in a rural-urban catchment: Johnson Creek, Oregon, Journal of Flood Risk Management 12(4) e12496. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12496
Chen, H. J., & Chang, H. (2014). Response of discharge, TSS, and E. coli to rainfall events in urban, suburban, and rural watersheds. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 16(10), 2313–2324. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00327F
City of Portland. (2008). LiDAR digital elevation model. Portland, OR. Retrieved June 25, 2021, from https://www.portlandmaps.com/metadata/index.cfm?action=DisplayLayer&LayerID=53809
City of Portland. (2019). Portland Area Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Program (PAWMAP) | Environmental Monitoring | The City of Portland, Oregon. (n.d.). Retrieved November 21, 2021, from https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bes/article/489038
Cooley, A., & Chang, H. (2017). Precipitation intensity trend detection using hourly and daily observations in Portland. Oregon. Climate, 5(1), 10.
Cooley, A., & Chang, H. (2021). Detecting change in precipitation indices using observed (1977–2016) and modeled future climate data in Portland, Oregon, USA. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 12(4), 1135–1153. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2020.043
Dewitz, J., & U.S. Geological Survey. (2021). National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2019 products (ver. 2.0, June 2021): U.S. Geological Survey data release. Retrieved August 15, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.5066/P9KZCM54
Dwivedi, D., Mohanty, B. P., & Lesikar, B. J. (2016). Impact of the linked surface water-soil water-groundwater system on transport of E. coli in the subsurface. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 227(9), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-3053-2
ESRI. (2021). ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
Fernandes, A. C. P., Sanches Fernandes, L. F., Cortes, R. M. V., & Leal Pacheco, F. A. (2019). The role of landscape configuration, season, and distance from contaminant sources on the degradation of stream water quality in urban catchments. water,11, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11102025
Fish, N., & Jordan, M. (2018). Executive Summary—Findings from Years 1–4. 21. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bes/article/689921
Garcia-Cuerva, L., Berglund, E. Z., & Rivers, L. (2018). An integrated approach to place Green Infrastructure strategies in marginalized communities and evaluate stormwater mitigation. Journal of Hydrology, 559, 648–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.066
Goodling, E., Green, J., & McClintock, N. (2015). Uneven development of the sustainable city: Shifting capital in Portland. Oregon. Urban Geography, 36(4), 504–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1010791
Hallberg, M., Renman, G., & Lundbom, T. (2007). Seasonal variations of ten metals in highway runoff and their partition between dissolved and particulate matter. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 181(1), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-006-9289-5
Hatt, B. E., Fletcher, T. D., Walsh, C. J., & Taylor, S. L. (2004). The influence of urban density and drainage infrastructure on the concentrations and loads of pollutants in small streams. Environmental Management, 34(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0221-8
Hobbie, S. E., Finlay, J. C., Janke, B. D., Nidzgorski, D. A., Millet, D. B., & Baker, L. A. (2017). Contrasting nitrogen and phosphorus budgets in urban watersheds and implications for managing urban water pollution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(16), 4177–4182. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618536114
Horton, R. E. (1945). Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: Hydro-physical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 56(3), 275–370.
Huber, M., Welker, A., & Helmreich, B. (2016). Critical review of heavy metal pollution of traffic area runoff: Occurrence, influencing factors, and partitioning. Science of the Total Environment, 541, 895–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.033
Jang, J., Hur, H. -G., Sadowsky, M. J., Byappanahalli, M. N., Yan, T., & Ishii, S. (2017). Environmental Escherichia coli: Ecology and public health implications-A review. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 123(3), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13468
Jun, M. J. (2004). The effects of Portland’s urban growth boundary on urban development patterns and commuting. Urban Studies, 41(7), 1333–1348. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000214824
Kim, S. B., Shin, H. J., Park, M., & Kim, S. J. (2015). Assessment of future climate change impacts on snowmelt and stream water quality for a mountainous high-elevation watershed using SWAT. Paddy and Water Environment, 13(4), 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-014-0471-x
Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., Neter, J. (2004). Applied Linear Regression Models (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Irwin
Lintern, A., Webb, J. A., Ryu, D., Liu, S., Bende-Michl, U., Waters, D., Leahy, P., Wilson, P., & Western, A. W. (2018). Key factors influencing differences in stream water quality across space. Wires Water, 5(1), e1260. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1260
Mainali, J., & Chang, H. (2018). Landscape and anthropogenic factors affecting spatial patterns of water quality trends in a large river basin, South Korea. Journal of Hydrology, 564, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.074
Mainali, J., Chang, H., & Chun, Y. (2019). A review of spatial statistical approaches to modeling water quality. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 43(6), 801–826. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133319852003
Matthews, S. A. (2006). GeoDa and Spatial Regression Modeling. 90.
McCarthy, K. (2006). Assessment of the usefulness of semipermeable membrane devices for long-term watershed monitoring in an urban slough system. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 118(1), 293–318.
McGarigal, K. (1995). FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure (Vol. 351). US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 122.
McKee, B. A., Molina, M., Cyterski, M., & Couch, A. (2020). Microbial source tracking (MST) in Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area: Seasonal and precipitation trends in MST marker concentrations, and associations with E. coli levels, pathogenic marker presence, and land use. Water Research, 171, 115435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115435
Meierdiercks, K. L., Kolozsvary, M. B., Rhoads, K. P., Golden, M., & McCloskey, N. F. (2017). The role of land surface versus drainage network characteristics in controlling water quality and quantity in a small urban watershed. Hydrological Processes, 31(24), 4384–4397. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11367
O’Donnell, E. C., Thorne, C. R., Yeakley, J. A., & Chan, F. K. S. (2020). Sustainable flood risk and stormwater management in blue-green cities; an interdisciplinary case study in Portland, Oregon. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(5), 757–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12854
Oregon Department of Transportation. (2021). Impacts of Covid-19 on traffic, Portland region | Oregon State Library. (n.d.). Retrieved August 19, 2021, from https://digital.osl.state.or.us/islandora/object/osl:945468
Oregon Metro. (2021). RLIS Discovery. Retrieved July 30, 2021, from https://rlisdiscovery.oregonmetro.gov/
Phillips, T. H., Baker, M. E., Lautar, K., Yesilonis, I., & Pavao-Zuckerman, M. A. (2019). The capacity of urban forest patches to infiltrate stormwater is influenced by soil physical properties and soil moisture. Journal of Environmental Management, 246, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.127
Post, G. C., Chang, H., & Banis, D. (2022). The spatial relationship between patterns of disappeared streams and residential development in Portland, Oregon, USA. Journal of Maps, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2022.2035264
Pratt, B., & Chang, H. (2012). Effects of land cover, topography, and built structure on seasonal water quality at multiple spatial scales. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 209–210, 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.12.068
Ramirez, D., Chang, H., & Gelsey, K. (2022). Effects of antecedent precipitation amount and COVID-19 lockdown on water quality along an urban gradient. Hydrology, 9, 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9120220
RStudio Team. (2021). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA URL http://www.rstudio.com/
Salerno, F., Gaetano, V., & Gianni, T. (2018). Urbanization and climate change impacts on surface water quality: Enhancing the resilience by reducing impervious surfaces. Water Research, 144, 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.058
Shi, P., Zhang, Y., Li, Z., Li, P., & Xu, G. (2017). Influence of land use and land cover patterns on seasonal water quality at multi-spatial scales. CATENA, 151, 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.12.017
Shrestha, S., & Kazama, F. (2007). Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: A case study of the Fuji river basin. Japan. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22(4), 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.02.001
Sliva, L., & Dudley Williams, D. (2001). Buffer Zone versus Whole Catchment Approaches to Studying Land Use Impact on River Water Quality. Water Research, 35(14), 3462–3472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00062-8
Smalling, K. L., Rowe, J. C., Pearl, C. A., Iwanowicz, L. R., Givens, C. E., Anderson, C. W., & Adams, M. J. (2021). Monitoring wetland water quality related to livestock grazing in amphibian habitats. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193(2), 1–17.
Smith, V. H., Tilman, G. D., & Nekola, J. C. (1999). Eutrophication: Impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems. Environmental Pollution, 100(1), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00091-3
Sonoda, K., Yeakley, J. A., & Walker, C. E. (2001). Near-stream landuse effects on streamwater nutrient distribution in an urbanizing watershed. Journal of the American Water Resources Association., 37, 1512–1537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03657.x
Sörme, L., & Lagerkvist, R. (2002). Sources of heavy metals in urban wastewater in Stockholm. Science of the Total Environment, 298(1), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00197-3
Strahler, A. N. (1952). Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 63(11), 1117–1142.
Taguchi, V. J., Weiss, P. T., Gulliver, J. S., Klein, M. R., Hozalski, R. M., Baker, L. A., Finlay, J. C., Keeler, B. L., & Nieber, J. L. (2021). It is not easy being green: Recognizing unintended consequences of green stormwater infrastructure. Water, 12(2), 522.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service. (2007). Chapter 7 Hydrologic Soil Groups. In Part 630 Hydrology National Engineering Handbook. Retrieved August 20, 2022, from https://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/OpenNonWebContent.aspx?content=17757.wba
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service. (2019). Gridded Soil Survey Geographic (gSSURGO) Database for Oregon. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/resources/data-and-reports/web-soil-survey
USEPA. (2019). National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2018/19: Field Operations Manual Wadeable. EPA-841-B-17–003a. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Washington, DC.
Vitro, K. A., BenDor, T. K., Jordanova, T. V., & Miles, B. (2017). A geospatial analysis of land use and stormwater management on fecal coliform contamination in North Carolina streams. Science of the Total Environment, 603–604, 709–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.093
Wilson, C. E., Hunt, W. F., Winston, R. J., & Smith, P. (2015). Comparison of Runoff Quality and Quantity from a Commercial Low-Impact and Conventional Development in Raleigh, North Carolina. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 141(2), 05014005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000842
Withers, P. J. A., Neal, C., Jarvie, H. P., & Doody, D. G. (2014). Agriculture and eutrophication: Where do we go from here? Sustainability, 6(9), 5853–5875. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6095853
Xu, H., Xu, G., Wen, X., Hu, X., & Wang, Y. (2021). Lockdown effects on total suspended solids concentrations in the Lower Min River (China) during COVID-19 using time-series remote sensing images. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 98, 102301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102301
You, Q., Fang, N., Liu, L., Yang, W., Zhang, L., & Wang, Y. (2019). Effects of land use, topography, climate and socio-economic factors on geographical variation pattern of inland surface water quality in China. PLoS ONE, 14(6), e0217840. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217840
Yu, S., Yu, G. B., Liu, Y., Li, G. L., Feng, S., Wu, S. C., & Wong, M. H. (2012). Urbanization impairs surface water quality: Eutrophication and metal stress in the grand canal of China. River Research and Applications, 28(8), 1135–1148. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1501
Funding
This research was sponsored by the US National Science Foundation under grant no. 1758006.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Katherine Gelsey derived the spatial variables, conducted the literature review, made all figures and tables, and wrote the body of the paper. Heejun Chang provided research supervision and offered feedback on data processing, results, and manuscript writing. Heejun Chang and Katherine created the research design. Daniel Ramirez provided feedback, supplemental literature review, and base scripts in R for data processing and figure-making.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
All authors have read, understood, and have complied as applicable with the statement on “Ethical responsibilities of Authors” as found in the Instructions for Authors.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gelsey, K., Chang, H. & Ramirez, D. Effects of landscape characteristics, anthropogenic factors, and seasonality on water quality in Portland, Oregon. Environ Monit Assess 195, 219 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10821-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10821-2