Abstract
A study of benthic foraminiferal species was carried out along Nellore Coast of South India. Analysis of surfacial sediment samples from the study area shows enrichment in heavy metals (Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn). The environment has become so lethal to foraminifera that minimal species number (4–7) can currently preserved in living condition in a depth less than 5-fth contour from coast. Samples from outfalls which receive only agricultural and aquacultural drainage water show heavy metal concentrations slightly higher to natural baseline levels, and yielding, living foraminifera (10–15). The frequent occurrence of deformed and abnormal specimens in Industrial outfalls, comparable to aquacultural and agricultural outlets reveal that (a) benthic foraminifera are more sensitive to industrial wastes containing heavy metals, (b) agricultural and aquacultural wastes do not significantly harm benthic foraminifera, and (c) morphological abnormalities of the foraminiferal tests depend upon the nature of the pollutant.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alve, E. (1991). Benthic foraminifera reflecting heavy metal pollution in Sorfjord, Western Norway. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 21, 1–19.
Alve, E. (1995). Benthic foraminiferal responses to estuarine pollution: A review. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 25, 190–203.
Aschan, M. A., & Skullernd, A. M. (1990). Effects of changes in sewage pollution of soft bottom macrofauna communities in the inner Oslofjord, Norway. Sarsia, 75, 169–190.
Bhalla, S. N., & Nigam, R. (1986). Recent foraminifera from polluted marine environment of Velaso Beach, South Goa, India. Revue de paleobiologic, 5, 43–46.
Divrikli, U., Soylak, M., Elci, L., & Dogan, M. (2003). Trace heavy metal levels in street dust samples from Yozgat City Center, Turkey. Journal of Trace and Microprobe Techniques, 21, 351–361.
Jayaraju, N., & Reddy, K. R. (1996). Impact of pollution on coastal zone monitoring with benthic foraminifera of Tuticorin, South India. IJMS, 29, 376–378.
Resig, J. M. (1996). Foraminiferal ecology around ocean outfalls off southern California in waste disposal in the marine environment. Pergamon, London, 104–121.
Samir, A. M. (2000). The response of benthic foraminifera and ostracodes to various pollution sources: A study from two lagoons in Egypt. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 30, 83–98.
Siegel, G. A. (1975). Foraminifers of Guayamilla Bay and their use as environmental indicators. Revista Espanola de Micropalaeontology, 7, 453–487.
Sharifi, A. R., Crondace, I. W., & Austin, R. L. (1991). Benthic foraminiferids as pollution indicators in Southampton water, Southern England, UK. Journal of Micropalaeontology, 10, 109–113.
Soylak, M., Uzek, U., Narin, I., Tüzen, M., Turkoglu, O., & Elci, L. (2004). Sequential extraction procedure for dust samples from Kayseri-Turkey. .. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 13, 454–457.
Srinivas, K. (1991). Study of recent ostracod from the coastal and estuarine sediments of chennayapalam—Kondurupalam, East coast of India. Unpubl Ph.D thesis, S.V.University, India.
Watkins, J. G. (1961). Foraminiferal ecology around the Orange Country, California, ocean water outfall. Micropaleo, 7, 199−206.
Walton, W. R. (1952). Technique for recognition of living foraminifera. Contributions from the Cushman Foundation. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 3, 56–60.
Yanko, V., Ahmad, M., & Kaminski, M. (1998). Morphological deformities of benthic foraminiferal tests in response to pollution by heavy metals: Implications of pollution monitoring. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 27, 177–200.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jayaraju, N., Sundara Raja Reddy, B.C. & Reddy, K.R. The response of benthic foraminifera to various pollution sources: A study from Nellore Coast, East Coast of India. Environ Monit Assess 142, 319–323 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9931-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9931-8