Abstract
Mercury is a global pollutant that has been widely shown to adversely affect reproduction and other endpoints related to fitness and health in birds, but almost nothing is known about its effects on migration relative to other life cycle processes. Here I consider the physiological and histological effects that mercury is known to have on non-migrating birds and non-avian vertebrates to identify potential mechanisms by which mercury might hinder migration performance. I posit that the broad ability of mercury to inactivate enzymes and compromise the function of other proteins is a single mechanism by which mercury has strong potential to disrupt many of the physiological processes that make long-distance migration possible. In just this way alone, there is reason to expect mercury to interfere with navigation, flight endurance, oxidative balance, and stopover refueling. Navigation and flight could be further affected by neurotoxic effects of mercury on the brain regions that process geomagnetic information from the visual system and control biomechanics, respectively. Interference with photochemical reactions in the retina and decreases in scotopic vision sensitivity caused by mercury also have the potential to disrupt visual-based magnetic navigation. Finally, migration performance and possibly survival might be limited by the immunosuppressive effects of mercury on birds at a time when exposure to novel pathogens and parasites is great. I conclude that mercury pollution is likely to be further challenging what is already often the most difficult and perilous phase of a migratory bird’s annual cycle, potentially contributing to global declines in migratory bird populations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Mercury has become a ubiquitous, global pollutant over the past two centuries as a result of fossil fuel combustion, artisanal gold mining, and other human activities (Driscoll et al. 2007, 2013). The ability of atmospheric mercury to travel long distances before entering aquatic and terrestrial systems via precipitation or cloud water allows mercury to contaminate areas far away from its site of origin (Selin 2009; Driscoll et al. 2013). This widespread atmospheric deposition, combined with local point-source releases of mercury into air, soil, and water is exposing humans and wildlife alike to a toxin that is capable of having myriad adverse health effects (Wolfe et al. 1998; Selin 2009; Driscoll et al. 2013).
Like most contaminants, mercury generally poses the greatest risk to large-bodied, predatory animals that consume biomagnified concentrations in their prey. The most harmful and bioavailable form of mercury, methylmercury (MeHg), is most readily formed in aquatic ecosystems, placing animals that are both predatory and aquatic (or have diets of largely aquatic origin) at even greater risk (Scheuhammer et al. 2007). Dosing experiments and field studies determined toxicity thresholds and the impacts of mercury to such species decades ago, while animals at lower trophic positions and many associated with terrestrial habitats were largely overlooked for having little potential to accumulate harmful levels (Seewagen 2010). In more recent years, however, songbirds (Passeriformes) and other animals occupying low positions within food webs have been increasingly observed to have much higher mercury levels than once expected. This includes small songbirds that have invertebrate-based diets and live in terrestrial systems with no known current or historical point-source contamination (e.g., Rimmer et al. 2005, 2010). Captive dosing studies and field studies of songbirds have recently determined that at the upper range of the levels observed in the wild, mercury can exert many of the same adverse effects as it does on piscivorous waterbirds and other large-bodied non-passerines, including but not limited to altered endocrine and immune system function, behavioral impairments, and reduced reproductive success (Whitney and Cristol 2017).
Nearly all research on the effects of mercury on both passerine and non-passerine birds has focused on survivorship and endpoints related to reproduction and health despite the fact that the many negative effects of mercury seen in these contexts could also affect migration (Seewagen 2010). Migration may be a period of particularly heightened exposure to mercury as a result of hyperphagic feeding during stopovers (Klaassen et al. 2012) and protein catabolism during flight (Seewagen et al. 2016). At this same time, migrants are faced with a physically and cognitively demanding task that requires a complex interplay of physiological processes and pushes them to the limits of their abilities. Yet few studies have directly or indirectly investigated the effects of mercury on migrating birds, or considered how the negative effects of mercury on physiological processes and behaviors that are important to reproduction and health might also have important consequences for migration.
Here, I explain how some of the physiological and histological effects of mercury on non-migrating birds and non-avian vertebrates represent potential mechanisms by which mercury threatens to disrupt some of the most fundamental elements of migration, including navigation, endurance flight, oxidative balance, stopover refueling, and disease resistance. I focus on long-distance, night-migrant songbirds, but most of the potential mechanisms are relevant to any birds that engage in a form of migration that is energetically demanding and requires accurate orientation and navigation. Approximately 19% of the extant bird species on Earth are migratory, and among all birds, migratory species have experienced disproportionately steep population declines over the past century (Kirby et al. 2008; NABCI 2016). For the reasons discussed herein, I believe that mercury is likely to be further challenging what is already considered to be the most difficult and dangerous phase of a migratory bird’s annual cycle (Sillett and Holmes 2002, Klaassen et al. 2014), potentially contributing to the downward population trends of many of the world’s migratory bird species.
Orientation and navigation
At its simplest, successful migration between breeding and wintering areas requires birds to fly in the proper direction, for the proper distance. Many species of songbirds migrate at night, navigating by cues provided by Earth’s magnetic fields, the setting sun, stars, and possibly environmental odors (Holland et al. 2009; Chernetsov 2016). Nocturnal migrants can perceive Earth’s magnetic fields through specialized sensory pathways that involve a magnetite-based detector in the upper beak and a light-dependent radical pair process that occurs in the eyes. Magnetite in the upper beak is thought to transmit information on magnetic intensity to the brain through the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve and provide birds with a sense of location, but not direction (Mouritsen and Hore 2012). In contrast, photoexcitation of cryptochrome molecules in the eyes of night-migrants creates a radical pair process (see Ritz et al. 2000) through which birds are believed to visually perceive the inclination of magnetic fields and thereby distinguish north from south (Mouritsen et al. 2005; Stapput et al. 2008). The signal from the photoreceptors is processed by an area of the brain known as Cluster N, which is a specialized component of the thalomofugal pathway and located in the hyperpallium and mesopallium (Mouritsen et al. 2005; Heyers et al. 2007; Mouritsen and Hore 2012). Night-migrants are not able to orient properly when radical pair formation in the eyes or the processing of that information by the brain is disrupted (Stapput et al. 2008; Zapka et al. 2009). As such, radical pair-based visual sensing of magnetic fields is a primary magnetic orientation mechanism on which night-migrant songbirds rely to reach their destination.
The hippocampus, which largely controls spatial memory in birds, is another region of the brain that is involved in navigation (landmark-based rather than magnetic) by night-migrants as well as diurnal homing pigeons (Columba livia domestica) (Strasser et al. 1998; Bingman and Cheng 2005). Evidence for this includes observations that within the same species, migratory subspecies have larger hippocampi and more hippocampal neurons, and perform better at spatial memory tasks than non-migratory subspecies (Cristol et al. 2003; Pravosudov et al. 2006). Also, within individual birds, migration experience may increase hippocampus volume and the number of neurons in the hippocampus. Adult night-migrant songbirds that have migrated before and therefore learned important landmarks along their route have a larger hippocampus and more hippocampal neurons than juveniles of the same species that have never migrated before (Healy et al. 1996). Similar experience-driven increases in hippocampus size have been documented in homing pigeons (Cnotka et al. 2008). Pigeons also have elevated neuronal activity in the hippocampus while they are homing, and numerous lesion studies have shown that damage to the hippocampus significantly impairs their homing ability (Shimizu et al. 2004).
Navigation is a complex cognitive behavior that is controlled by these phenotypically flexible brain regions and biophysical processes, some of which are unique to birds. It follows that any disruption of the mechanisms underlying navigation can be potentially disastrous to a migrant. MeHg is a powerful neurotoxin that readily crosses the blood-brain barrier, and at high enough concentrations, has been observed to cause demyelination, axon degeneration, and lesions in bird brains (Heinz and Locke 1976; Evans et al. 1982). Neurotransmitter function is sometimes also compromised (reviewed by Whitney and Cristol 2017). Concentrations of MeHg in bird brains are often highest in the cerebellum, the region responsible for motor learning and flight mechanics, but MeHg can sometimes reach its highest concentrations in the cerebrum (Hamilton et al. 2011), where Cluster N and the hippocampus are located. Additionally, there is evidence from mice that the mammalian hippocampus, which is homologous to the avian hippocampus (Sherry and Hoshooley 2007), is particularly susceptible to MeHg accumulation compared to other areas of the brain (Fujimura et al. 2009). It is currently unknown whether environmentally relevant amounts of MeHg are capable of damaging Cluster N or the hippocampus to an extent that would impair a bird’s ability to migrate on course. However, Swaddle et al. (2017) found that zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) dosed with environmentally relevant levels of MeHg and tasked with finding hidden food performed poorly compared to control birds. Recalling the locations of stored or hidden food is a form of spatial memory in birds that is also controlled by the hippocampus (Sherry and Hoshooley 2007), which suggests that MeHg dosing partially compromised the functionality of this region of the zebra finches’ brain (Swaddle et al. 2017). Moye et al. (2016) found MeHg to reduce the homing performance of pigeons, which also suggests some impairment of hippocampal function. More studies are needed to understand the effects of MeHg on the avian hippocampus as well as Cluster N, and determine whether wild songbirds are exposed to MeHg levels that are capable of impacting the brain circuits that are critical to navigation.
While little is known about the effects of MeHg on the areas of the avian brain that are involved in navigation, even less is known about the effects of MeHg on the eyes of birds. Before the brain of a night-migrant can process geomagnetic information from the visual system, the eyes must first properly react to stimuli and transmit signals to the thalomofugal pathway. The visual magnetoreception system begins with the excitation of retinal photoreceptor molecules by dim light in the blue-green spectrum, which forms radical pairs. Radical pair formation in different parts of the retina in relation to the bird’s orientation to magnetic fields is thought to generate the visual signal that allows birds to “see” the magnetic fields (Ritz et al. 2000; Mouritsen et al. 2004). Cryptochromes, the primary molecules in the eye that are believed to be involved in light-dependent magnetoreception in birds, are concentrated in the ganglion cells, large displaced ganglion cells, and photoreceptors (rods and cones). Cryptochrome expression and neuronal activity are particularly high in large displaced ganglion cells during magnetic orientation (Mouritsen et al. 2004). Any physical damages to these structures of the retina or interference with neurotransmission from the retina to the brain could therefore be expected to interfere with the radical pair-based navigational mechanism of birds.
MeHg is able to cross the blood-retina boundary. It accumulates in the retina and remains there for long periods of time relative to other tissues (Warfvinge and Bruun 1996; Fox 2015). Although the effects of this on the eyes and vision of birds do not appear to be known (aside from gross deformities in embryos and hatchlings exposed to high concentrations), the visual systems of vertebrates in general are considered to be highly sensitive to MeHg (Mela et al. 2012; Fox 2015). Wide-ranging and immediate effects of MeHg on vision have been documented in fish, amphibians, and mammals, including humans. For example, several studies have shown impaired color vision, reduced contrast sensitivity, and visual field constriction in non-human primates dosed at high levels (e.g., Burbacher et al. 2005) and in people with high degrees of occupational exposure to mercury (e.g., Canto-Pereira et al. 2005; Ventura et al. 2005). Environmentally relevant levels of MeHg have been observed to cause cellular degeneration, structural damages to membranes, morphological changes in photoreceptors, peroxidative damage, and changes in neurotransmitter activity in the eyes of vertebrates (Mela et al. 2012; Pereira et al. 2016).
Nighttime (scotopic) vision is particularly affected by MeHg because rods can fail to properly respond to light after exposure to mercuric ions (Evans and Garman 1980; Tessier-Lavigne et al. 1985; Fox 2015). Histopathological effects that environmentally relevant concentrations of MeHg have been observed to have on the rods of vertebrate eyes include cellular deterioration and morphological changes in the inner and outer segments, and discontinuity of the disc membrane with the outer segment plasma membrane (Mela et al. 2012). Resulting decreases in rod receptor potential and scotopic sensitivity have been observed in fish (Hawryshyn et al. 1982), amphibians (Fox and Sillman 1979), and mammals (Fox 2015), and therefore, can be expected to occur among avian taxa as well. Scotopic vision is of course critical to birds that are active at night, and cryptochrome-containing rods are likely to be a major site of radical pair formation during magnetic compass orientation (Solov’yov et al. 2010). It is therefore conceivable that MeHg can impede the light-dependent magnetoreception process of night-migrants from the very first stage.
Collectively, the detrimental effects of MeHg on both the brain and the eyes of other vertebrates, along with a recent finding that mercury can interfere with magnetic alignment in turtles (Landler et al. 2017), provide reason to believe that MeHg might impair multiple aspects of the navigational system of migratory birds. As with any endpoint, the important question is whether such effects on birds could result from exposure to environmentally relevant levels of mercury. This is an entirely unstudied area of ecotoxicology and should be a research priority given the fundamental significance of navigation to migration.
Flight endurance
Migration for most songbirds and many other species of birds consists of multiple long-distance flights separated by stopovers of one or more days in between. These long-distance, non-stop flights routinely last several hours (Bowlin et al. 2005; DeLuca et al. 2015), requiring birds to sustain a high level of aerobic activity for long periods of time, and with exclusively endogenous sources of energy, nutrients, and water (McWilliams et al. 2004). Birds have evolved unique physiological abilities to meet the extreme energetic demands of migration. Chief among them is the ability to fuel high intensity aerobic exercise with fatty acids rather than carbohydrates, unlike mammals (McWilliams et al. 2004; Guglielmo 2010). Fat yields 8 to 10 times the energy of carbohydrates and protein per unit of wet mass, making it a far more economical fuel substrate for a bird to carry in flight (Jenni and Jenni-Eiermann 1998). Yet, the insolubility of fatty acids makes them difficult to transport from adipose tissue through the circulatory system and into the myocytes of flight muscles for use as energy (McWilliams et al. 2004; Guglielmo 2010). To overcome this obstacle, migrating birds substantially upregulate key enzymes and transport proteins that can mobilize and deliver fatty acids at the rate necessary to power long-distance flight (Egeler et al. 2000; McWilliams et al. 2004; McFarlan et al. 2009; Guglielmo 2010). This ability to sustain endurance exercise with extramuscular fatty acids sets birds apart from all other vertebrates, except possibly migratory bats (Guglielmo 2010).
To understand the potential impact of mercury on the endurance of migrating birds, first consider the primary steps in the fatty acid oxidation process and the important role of catabolic enzymes and transport proteins. The utilization of fatty acids to fuel migratory flights begins with the mobilization of triacylglycerol (TAG) from the adipocytes of a bird’s fat stores. The TAG is hydrolyzed into non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) by the enzyme hormone sensitive lipase (HSL), which are then bound and transported through the circulatory system and to the working muscles by plasma albumin. Very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) produced by the liver and hydrolyzed by lipoprotein lipase (LPL) provides muscles with additional exogenous NEFA. At the sarcolemma, two transport proteins that are heavily upregulated during migration, plasma membrane fatty acid binding protein (FABP-pm) and fatty acid translocase (FAT/CD36), carry the NEFA across the membrane and into the cytosol. They join additional NEFA that are derived from the hydrolysis of intracellular TAG droplets. The NEFA are transported through the cytosol by heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) and converted to acyl-CoA by long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase (LCACS). The acyl-CoA is subsequently converted to acyl-carnitine by carnitine acyl transferase (CAT) and then crosses the mitochondrial membrane, where it is converted back to acyl-CoA before entering the beta oxidation pathway. Finally, acetyl-CoA produced through the beta oxygen pathway is catabolized in the citric acid cycle, ultimately yielding energy in the form of ATP (McWilliams et al. 2004; Weber 2011). Meanwhile, the heightened amount of oxygen needed for these aerobic reactions is transported by hemoglobin through the bloodstream to the working muscles and then carried from the sarcolemma to the mitochondria by myoglobin (Wittenberg and Wittenberg 1989). Limitations imposed on any of these biochemical processes and the molecules involved might compromise the ability of birds to engage in the long bouts of endurance exercise that are required to successfully travel the thousands of kilometers that often separate breeding and wintering grounds.
The effect of MeHg on the physiological processes involved in fatty acid oxidation during high intensity exercise in birds has not been investigated directly or in the context of flight endurance. However, MeHg and another highly toxic form of mercury (mercury chloride) have been found to alter the expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs; Kawakami et al. 2012; Richter et al. 2014), which are the primary regulators of lipid metabolism in birds and other vertebrates (Feige et al. 2006; Weber 2011). Among the many aspects of lipid metabolism regulated by PPARs is mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation, including the expression of key enzymes involved in the process (Feige et al. 2006; Weber 2011). Along with this, the propensity of MeHg to inactivate enzymes and degenerate other proteins by binding to thiol groups (Yadetie et al. 2013; Marasco and Costantini 2016; Ynalvez et al. 2016) raises concern that MeHg could limit a bird’s capacity to mobilize, transport, and oxidize extramuscular fatty acids at a sufficiently rapid rate to fuel migratory flights.
One indication of this is that plasma proteins, and plasma albumin in particular, have been observed to significantly decrease in birds in response to high (Spalding et al. 2000a; Hoffman et al. 2005) and environmentally relevant (Sepúlveda et al. 1999; Kenow et al. 2007) MeHg exposure. As the primary protein responsible for the delivery of fatty acids to the working muscles, significant reductions in plasma albumin could diminish a migrating bird’s overall capacity to rapidly catabolize fat (Jenni-Eiermann and Jenni 1992; Jenni and Jenni-Eiermann 1998). Whether environmentally relevant levels of MeHg can reduce plasma albumin concentrations greatly enough to have an appreciable effect on a migrant’s ability to deliver fatty acids from adipose tissue to the working muscles at the necessary rate is unknown, however, and in need of study.
Beyond this potential limitation on the delivery of fatty acids to the muscles, the effects of MeHg on proteins could also limit the subsequent uptake of those fatty acids by the myocytes. Of the three primary stages of exogenous fatty acid utilization (mobilization, transport, oxidation), transport of NEFA across the sarcolemma is considered the most rate-limiting step affecting an animal’s capacity to power working muscles with fat (McWilliams et al. 2004). As such, reductions in FABP-pm and FAT/CD36 may be expected to have the greatest potential to deleteriously affect fatty acid utilization by, and the endurance of, migrating birds. I am unaware of any research to examine direct effects of MeHg on these critical transport proteins. However, PPARs regulate the expression of genes that control FABP-pm and FAT/CD36 (Feige et al. 2006), and alterations to PPAR expression caused by mercury (Kawakami et al. 2012; Richter et al. 2014) might therefore interfere with the substantial upregulation of FABP-pm and FAT/CD36 that is required for migration. In mice, mercury chloride was found to reduce transcription of FAT/CD36 mRNA (Kawakami et al. 2012), further raising the possibility of an adverse effect of MeHg on FAT/CD36 in birds.
Once fatty acids have been transported across the sarcolemma, H-FABP is needed to transport them through the cytosol, and LCAS and CAT are needed to convert them to acyl-CoA for entry into the beta oxidation pathway in the mitochondria. Any inactivation or reduced expression of this transport protein and the enzymes that enable fatty acids to be oxidized by the mitochondria would also potentially limit a bird’s ability to utilize fatty acids to support migratory flight. While effects of MeHg on H-FABP, LCAS, and CAT in particular appear to be unknown, environmentally relevant MeHg exposure in fish has been found to inactivate acyl-CoA dehydrogenase enzymes that are involved in beta oxidation (Yadetie et al. 2013). Disruptions of mitochondrial processes by MeHg, including decreased mitochondrial oxidation and ATP production, have also been observed in other studies of fish as well as rodents (Stohs and Bagchi 1995; Gonzalez et al. 2005; Cambier et al. 2009), which suggests that the oxidation stage of extramuscular fatty acid utilization in migrating birds is likely vulnerable to effects from MeHg. Yet another way in which MeHg might limit fatty acid oxidation rate is by reducing the amount of oxygen available to the mitochondria. Birds elevate hematocrit and hemoglobin levels during migration to meet the increased oxygen demands of long-distance flight (Landys-Ciannelli et al. 2002; Morton 2002; Krause et al. 2016). Mercury is a heme inhibitor, and birds exposed to environmentally relevant and high levels have been found to have reduced concentrations of hemoglobin in their blood (as measured directly or inferred from hematocrit volume; Hoffman and Heinz 1998; Spalding et al. 2000a; Henny et al. 2002; Hoffman et al. 2009). This will constrain the oxygen carrying capacity of a bird and possibly its ability to engage in prolonged periods of high-intensity aerobic exercise, such as migratory flights (Seewagen 2010).
For all of these reasons, it is clear that MeHg has the potential to hinder the endurance of migrating birds by interfering with the delivery and uptake of both oxygen and fuel. Indeed, there are recent indications of this from MeHg-dosed yellow-rumped warblers (Setophaga coronata) that had shorter flight durations in a wind tunnel than control birds (Ma et al. 2018a) and zebra finches that were found to have significantly reduced peak metabolic rates as a result of environmentally relevant MeHg dosing (A.R. Gerson, D.A. Cristol, and C.L. Seewagen, unpublished data). Underlying causal mechanisms were not investigated in either study, however. Additional wind tunnel experiments and other approaches to determine the effects of environmentally relevant levels of MeHg on exogenous fatty acid utilization during high-intensity exercise are needed to better understand the threat that mercury pollution poses to the endurance of migrating birds. Rapid and prolonged catabolism of extramuscular fat stores is as fundamentally important to migration as navigation and orientation, and this should be another top research priority.
In addition to the physiological aspects of flight, more research is needed to investigate potential effects of mercury on biomechanics and feather development, both of which could also reduce flight efficiency and endurance. Mercury in birds can damage and accumulate at relatively high concentrations in the cerebellum (Borg et al. 1970; Hamilton et al. 2011; Scoville and Lane 2013), which is the area of the brain that controls flight and other motor skills. Environmentally relevant mercury dosing has recently been found to weaken the takeoff performance of European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris; Carlson et al. 2014) and the coordination of yellow-rumped warblers flying in a wind tunnel (Ma et al. 2018a), suggesting the possibility of neurological effects of mercury that could limit long-distance flight abilities of migratory birds. Increases in wing and tail feather asymmetry have been seen in some wild birds as a result of environmental mercury exposure (Evers et al. 2008; Herring et al. 2017; but see Clarkson et al. 2012), which could increase flight costs (Thomas 1993; Hambly et al. 2004), and over long distances, conceivably shorten flight durations, lengthen stopovers, and ultimately delay arrival. These biomechanical and morphological effects of mercury on migration have yet to be tested and are important subjects for future investigation.
Oxidative stress
Fatty acid oxidation and other aerobic metabolic processes in vertebrates generate reactive byproducts that cause oxidative damage to cells. As metabolic rate increases, so does the production of these reactive species (RS) and their potential to exceed the antioxidant defenses of the animal. How migrating birds repeatedly engage in long bouts of high-intensity endurance exercise as they fly from one destination to the next and withstand the extreme oxidative challenges imposed by this behavior has recently gained an increasing amount of attention among physiological ecologists (Costantini 2008; Skrip and McWilliams 2016; Cooper-Mullin and McWilliams 2016).
RS are generated in the mitochondria when not all oxygen molecules are fully reduced to water by the electron transport chain. Some intermediates that escape the electron transport chain have an unpaired electron, making them radicals that scavenge electrons from other compounds and turn them into radicals in the process. Others undergo reactions that make them radicals after escaping the electron transport chain. Collectively, these RS can take electrons from and cause structural and/or functional damage to lipids, proteins, and DNA throughout the body unless they are counteracted by endogenous or dietary antioxidants. The fats on which birds rely to fuel their migration are particularly vulnerable to oxidative damage, further heightening the need for migrants to maintain oxidative balance en route (Skrip and McWilliams 2016).
Mercury is a well-documented cause of oxidative stress in birds and other vertebrates due to its compounding effects of generating RS, like hydrogen peroxide, while simultaneously disrupting enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants, such as glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), vitamin C, and vitamin E (Stohs and Bagchi 1995; Ercal et al. 2001; Ynalvez et al. 2016; Whitney and Cristol 2017). For example, GSH has been found to be negatively related to MeHg, while oxidized glutathione (GSSH) and the ratio of GSH to GSSG have been found to be positively related to MeHg in several species of experimentally dosed and free-living waterbirds (reviewed by Whitney and Cristol 2017). Henry et al. (2015) found that developmental and dietary exposure of zebra finches to environmentally relevant concentrations of MeHg caused oxidative stress, as indicated by significantly reduced SOD activity and GSH to GSSG ratio. However, markers of oxidative stress were either unrelated to MeHg or related in the opposite direction than expected in free-living tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) nestlings with low environmental exposure (Custer et al. 2006, 2008). More work on the relationship between environmentally relevant levels of MeHg and oxidative stress in songbirds is needed.
Migrating birds produce exceptional amounts of RS as a natural and unavoidable consequence of long-distance flight, and are therefore already challenged to maintain a high antioxidant capacity throughout their migration (Costantini 2008; Skrip and McWilliams 2016; Cooper-Mullin and McWilliams 2016). It therefore seems that additional RS production, coupled with the deactivation of antioxidants as a result of mercury exposure could potentially overwhelm the ability of migrants to achieve oxidative balance and avoid harmful damage. Oxidative damage has been suggested to be a proximate mechanism underlying the myriad toxic effects of mercury on a vertebrate’s health, fitness, and survival (e.g., Sarafian and Verity 1991; Ali et al. 1992; Ercal et al. 2001). It stands to reason that any additional oxidative stress imposed on a migrating bird by mercury beyond that which is already levied by the metabolic requirements of long-distance flight could have pathological consequences during migration or later in life. Whether the incremental change to either side of the oxidative balance equation among migrating birds as a result of environmental MeHg exposure can be enough to cause meaningful increases in oxidative damage is an important and unanswered question.
Stopover refueling
In between long-distance migratory flights, birds must stop to rest and refuel before they can continue towards their goal destination. Stopover refueling includes the replenishment of fat stores and the rebuilding of lean tissues that were catabolized in flight (Karasov and Pinshow 1998; Seewagen and Guglielmo 2011), usually over the course of just one to a few days in the case of songbirds (e.g., Morris et al. 1996). Most birds are under selective pressure to minimize time spent migrating and they undergo a series of physiological adjustments in preparation for migration that allow them to gain exceptional amounts of body mass in this short amount of time at each stopover site (Guglielmo 2010; Ramenofsky 2011). The physiological processes involved in fattening are under the influence of pancreatic, thyroid, and adrenal hormones, and the enzymes upon which these hormones act (Ramenofsky 2011). Of particular importance are the pancreatic hormones insulin and glucagon, which are the principal regulators of lipogenesis and lipolysis in birds and other vertebrates (Griminger 1986; Karasov and Martinez del Rio 2007).
Migrants fatten by enlarging their gut, increasing their food intake, and selecting foods that are high in fats and carbohydrates, and have certain fatty acid composition (Pierce et al. 2004; McWilliams and Karasov 2014). Feeding stimulates secretion of insulin from beta cells in the pancreatic islet of Langerhans. The insulin stimulates activity of the enzyme adipose lipoprotein lipase (ALPL), which facilitates the deposition of circulating triglycerides into the adipose tissue for storage (Griminger 1986; Karasov and Martinez del Rio 2007; Ramanofsky 2011). Circulating triglycerides originate from dietary fatty acids or those that have been synthesized from other macronutrients by the liver (McWilliams et al. 2004). Fatty acid synthesis is fostered by malic enzyme and fatty acid synthase (Griminger 1986; Ramenofsky 2011). The reverse process of lipolysis during periods of negative energy balance is regulated by glucagon, which is triggered by hypoglycemia and stimulates the enzyme HSL to release stored fatty acids into the oxidation pathway discussed earlier (Karasov and Martinez del Rio 2007). The ratio of glucagon to insulin is therefore what largely controls whether a bird is in a state of energy storage or retrieval. Other hormones that appear to play a role in migratory fattening include corticosterone (CORT), triiodothyronine (T3), thyroxine (T4), prolactin, and possibly leptin (Ramenofsky 2011).
Stopover refueling rate is a major determinant of the overall duration of migration. Limitations on refueling rate can lengthen stopover durations, delay arrival, and reduce the energetic condition in which birds reach their breeding or wintering grounds (Lindstrom and Alerstam 1992; Schaub et al. 2008). These carry-over effects from migration to the breeding and wintering seasons can impact reproduction, survival, and possibly the population sizes of birds (Newton 2006; Norris and Marra 2007). It is therefore important to migratory bird conservation to understand whether anthropogenic changes to the environment are affecting the ability of migrants to efficiently and promptly refuel during stopovers (Mehlman et al. 2005; Klaassen et al. 2012).
MeHg is an endocrine disruptor in humans and wildlife (Dyer 2007; Tan et al. 2009), and in birds specifically, has been found to alter several hormones that are important to multiple life functions (Whitney and Cristol 2017). Effects of MeHg exposure on the endocrine system of vertebrates are widespread (Tan et al. 2009) but mainly center on pancreatic and thyroid function, including decreased hormone secretion from these organs (Soldin et al. 2008; Schumacher and Abbott 2017). Most notably, MeHg has a severe impact on pancreatic beta cell development, function, and apoptosis, which results in decreased glucose tolerance and insulin production to such an extent that it has been implicated as a contributor to worldwide increases in diabetes among humans (Chen et al. 2009, 2010; Tinkov et al. 2015; Schumacher and Abbott 2017). Insulin can also be directly compromised by the binding of mercury to its sulfur binding sites, and is among the hormones that are considered to be most sensitive to mercury (Chen et al. 2006; Rice et al. 2014).
There appear to be no published studies of the effects of MeHg on insulin production or other aspects of pancreatic function in birds, but the large body of evidence from other vertebrate taxa (Chen et al. 2006, 2009, 2010; Tinkov et al. 2015; Schumacher and Abbott 2017) suggests that similar adverse effects are likely. In the case of a migrating bird, the concern is that reduced insulin production and functionality as a result of MeHg exposure could decrease appetite and feeding intensity, and limit the stimulation of ALPL to store dietary fats consumed during stopovers. Given the nature of MeHg to broadly compromise enzyme activity (Marasco and Costantini 2016; Ynalvez et al. 2016), MeHg could also hinder energy storage by directly inactivating ALPL and other important enzymes involved in the process. MeHg exposure in fish was found to downregulate the transcription of fatty acid synthase (Klaper et al. 2008), an enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of fatty acids and is normally upregulated by birds during migration to support rapid lipogenesis (Ramenofsky et al. 1999; Egeler et al. 2000). Inactivation and/or reduced expression of fatty acid synthase by MeHg might therefore hinder the ability of migrants to synthesize fat at necessary rates. Mercury might further limit fat storage during stopovers by reducing intestinal absorption of glucose and the activity of several digestive enzymes, as has been observed in fish (Sastry and Gupta 1980; Gupta and Sastry 1981; Sastry and Rao 1984). Each of these effects on lipogenesis and fattening would slow down a bird’s overall stopover refueling rate and thereby lengthen the amount of time needed to obtain its desired departure fuel load.
The effects of MeHg on other hormones in birds that are involved in fattening are more equivocal. For example, multiple studies have found baseline concentrations of CORT in birds to be positively associated with environmental mercury exposure or dosing, while just as many have found the opposite or no relationship at all (reviewed by Whitney and Cristol 2017). The thyroid hormone, T3, which controls gene transcription for the malic enzyme that facilitates the synthesis of fatty acids from other macronutrients, was negatively related to total blood mercury levels in free-living tree swallow nestlings (Wada et al. 2009). T4, which is a thyroid hormone that has been found to increase with migratory readiness in songbirds (Wingfield et al. 1997), was also reduced (Wada et al. 2009). Conversely, T3 and/or T4 had no relationship with mercury levels in free-living lesser scaup (Aythya affinis; Pollock and Machin 2009) or great blue herons (Ardea herodias; Champoux et al. 2017). Baseline levels of prolactin, a pituitary hormone that stimulates feeding and lipogenesis (Goodridge and Ball 1967; Ramenofsky 2011), were not related to blood mercury concentrations in snow petrels (Pagodroma nivea; Tartu et al. 2015), but additional studies in birds appear to be lacking. In fish and rats, exposure to MeHg decreased prolactin gene expression and production (Richter et al. 2014; Maués et al. 2015), while other studies on non-avian taxa have found MeHg to increase prolactin levels possibly by interfering with the dopaminergic system that inhibits prolactin secretion (Carta et al. 2003; Tan et al. 2009). Much more research will be needed to understand the effects of mercury on these other hormones that are involved in migratory fattening.
Along with its potential effects on the physiological aspects of fattening, it is possible that mercury exposure could cause behavioral changes that would reduce a migrant’s stopover refueling performance (Seewagen 2010, 2013). For example, at high levels, mercury has been observed to suppress appetite and the motivation to forage in birds (Bouton et al. 1999; Spalding et al. 2000b; Evers et al. 2008). High levels of mercury have also been associated with lethargy and ataxia (e.g., Borg et al. 1970; Bouton et al. 1999; Evers et al. 2008, but see Swaddle et al. 2017), including a study that found that mercury dosing reduced the accuracy and rate at which rock doves (Columba livia) pecked at food (Evans et al. 1982). Reduced activity levels and impaired motor skills would be expected to hinder foraging efficiency during migration stopovers, when prompt location and acquisition of food is a requisite for rapid refueling.
Most of these studies have involved mercury levels that are above those normally observed in most free-living migratory songbirds, however, and it is therefore uncertain whether environmentally relevant levels of mercury can cause the kinds of behavioral changes that would impair the abilities of songbird migrants to refuel effectively. Only two studies have investigated the effects of mercury on the stopover refueling rates of birds. One found no relationship between total blood mercury concentration and plasma triglyceride level (an indicator of refueling rate) in northern waterthrushes (Parkesia noveboracensis) at an autumn stopover site in New York, USA (Seewagen 2013). It was concluded that either the mercury levels of the birds were low enough to have no detectable effect on foraging behavior, or food was plentiful enough at the site that birds were not challenged to an extent that would reveal differences in their foraging abilities. The other found mercury to be negatively associated with refueling rate in one (Geothlypis trichas) out of the four songbird species studied during fall and none out of the same four songbird species studied during spring at a stopover site in Florida, USA (E. Adams, personal communication). Similar studies on a range of bird species and in other stopover habitats are needed and encouraged in order to clarify whether exposure of free-living birds to environmental mercury can interfere with their refueling performance and ability to maintain their migratory schedule.
Immunocompetence
The avian immune system represents a series of coordinated physiological processes among macrophages, B lymphocytes, and T lymphocytes that protect a bird against the pathogens and parasites encountered in its environment (Sharma 1991). Relative to sedentary species, migratory birds are likely to have greater exposure to novel parasites and pathogens because their migrations take them through multiple geographic areas of the world, each with different climates, ecosystems, and biological communities (Møller and Erritzøe 1998; Figuerola and Green 2000; Altizer et al. 2011). The high densities at which migrants can occur at stopover sites may also increase contact with pathogens and the transmission of disease (Altizer et al. 2011). Migration may therefore be a particularly critical time in a migrant’s annual cycle at which to maintain a robust immune system. Contrary to this expectation, however, immune function in birds appears to be suppressed during migration (Owen and Moore 2006, 2008; Nebel et al. 2012; but see Hasselquist et al. 2007). This may be the result of an intentional and adaptive reallocation of energy from immune responses to flight and stopover refueling (Norris and Evans 2000) or an unavoidable impact of high intensity exercise on the immune system (Buehler et al. 2010; Nebel et al. 2012). In any case, this reduction in immunocompetence at a time when exposure to novel pathogens and parasites is likely to be at its highest makes migrants even more vulnerable to disease. Differing abilities of individual birds to manage the energetic tradeoff between mounting immune responses and engaging in migratory activity, and successfully defend themselves from infections during migration, may be a major contributor to migration mortality that acts to limit transmission by removing infected individuals from the population (Altizer et al. 2011; Risely et al. 2018).
Any additional factors that suppress immunocompetence in birds are likely to compound these effects of migration on the immune system and further challenge the ability of migrants to stay healthy. Immunotoxic effects of mercury have been documented in several vertebrate taxa, including birds. Waterbirds and poultry exposed to high levels of mercury have been observed to experience histological changes in the thymus, bursa, and spleens, suppressed antibody responses, decreased B-cell proliferation, and altered heterophil:lymphocyte ratios (Thaxton and Parkhurst 1973; Bridger and Thaxton 1983; Spalding et al. 2000a; Kenow et al. 2007; Whitney and Cristol 2017). The small number of studies that have been conducted on songbirds, either living in mercury-contaminated environments or dosed with environmentally relevant levels of mercury, also generally point towards a negative effect of mercury on their immune system (Hawley et al. 2009; Lewis et al. 2013; but see Caudill et al. 2015).
High energy activities are harder to sustain when the immune system is challenged. In migrating birds, pathogen infections have been observed to result in shortened flight distances, lowered stopover refueling rates, delayed arrival, and even reduced chances of survival (Van Gils et al. 2007; Risely et al. 2018). Any additional dampening of the immune system by mercury may therefore increase the likelihood and severity of infections during migration and the consequences of that for migration performance and survival. To what degree, if any, that mercury accumulation in free-living migratory birds can reduce migration performance or survivability by suppressing immune function has yet to be investigated, however, and warrants attention.
Conclusion
Although very few studies have yet to directly investigate the effects of mercury on migration, there is an abundance of information about the physiological changes that can occur in non-migrating birds as well as non-avian taxa to suggest that mercury poses a significant threat to bird migration in many ways (Fig. 1). The broad ability of mercury to inactivate enzymes and compromise the function of other proteins to which it binds is perhaps the mechanism by which mercury has the strongest potential to disrupt so many of the physiological processes that make long-distance migration possible. In just this way alone, mercury might interfere with magnetic compass navigation, flight endurance, oxidative balance, and stopover refueling.
Hindrance of any of these fundamental aspects of migration will inherently weaken migration performance, possibly to the extent that the likelihood of survival is reduced. Previous studies of the effect of mercury on survival, which have been limited to long-lived migratory waterbirds and tree swallows, have failed to find any strong evidence that environmentally relevant mercury exposure significantly reduces survivorship (reviewed by Whitney and Cristol 2017). Recent work by Ma et al. (2018b), however, found mean mercury levels in blackpoll warbler (Setophaga striata) and American redstart (Setophaga ruticilla) feathers grown during the post-breeding period and retained until the following year to be higher among birds during autumn than among conspecifics returning in the spring, suggesting that mercury may have contributed to migration mortality in these species. Although the pattern was not observed in all five of the species examined, the two species in which there was an apparent culling effect of mercury were also the species with the longest (i.e., most challenging) migrations. In blackpoll warblers, the species with the most extreme migration of any Neotropical migratory songbird (DeLuca et al. 2015), average mercury levels of feathers grown during the breeding season were 50% lower among the cohort of birds returning in the spring than among those that departed the previous autumn. This apparent removal of individuals with the highest mercury burdens from the population sometime between the onset of autumn migration and return in spring indicates that mercury accumulation may have affected their migration performance, perhaps by compromising their ability to navigate properly, fly efficiently, meet the energetic demands of long-distance flight, withstand oxidative damage, refuel efficiently, and/or avoid sickness and predation. As a fuller picture of mercury’s threats to birds emerges, future investigations will hopefully test these potential mechanisms by which this widespread and persistent environmental contaminant might affect the most vulnerable phase in the annual cycle of one fifth of all bird species.
References
Ali SF, LeBel CP, Bondy SC (1992) Reactive oxygen species formation as a biomarker of methylmercury and trimethyltin neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicol 13:637–648
Altizer S, Bartel R, Han BA (2011) Animal migration and infectious disease risk. Science 331:296–302
Bingman VP, Cheng K (2005) Mechanisms of animal global navigation: Comparative perspectives and enduring challenges. Ethol Ecol Evol 17:295–318
Borg K, Erne K, Hanko E, Wanntorp H (1970) Experimental secondary methyl mercury poisoning in the goshawk (Accipiter g. gentilis L.). Environ Pollut 1:91–104
Bouton SN, Frederick PC, Spalding MG, McGill H (1999) Effects of chronic, low concentrations of dietary methylmercury on the behavior of juvenile great egrets. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:1934–1939
Bowlin MS, Cochran WW, Wikelski MC (2005) Biotelemetry of new world thrushes during migration: physiology, energetics and orientation in the wild. Integr Comp Biol 45:295–304
Bridger MA, Thaxton JP (1983) Humoral immunity in the chicken as affected by mercury. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 12:45–49
Buehler DM, Tieleman BI, Piersma T (2010) Indices of immune function are lower in Red Knots (Calidris canutus) recovering protein than in those storing fat during stopover in Delaware Bay. Auk 127:394–401
Burbacher TM, Grant KS, Mayfield DB, Gilbert SG, Rice DC (2005) Prenatal methylmercury exposure affects spatial vision in adult monkeys. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 208:21–28
Cambier S, Benard G, Mesmer-Dudons N, Gonzalez P, Rossignol R, Brethes D, Bourdineaud JP (2009) At environmental doses, dietary methylmercury inhibits mitochondrial energy metabolism in skeletal muscles of the zebra fish (Danio rerio). Int J Biochem Cell Biol 41:791–799
Canto-Pereira LH, Lago M, Costa MF, Rodrigues AR, Saito CA, Silveira LCL, Ventura DF (2005) Visual impairment on dentists related to occupational mercury exposure. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 19:517–522
Carlson JR, Cristol D, Swaddle JP (2014) Dietary mercury exposure causes decreased escape takeoff flight performance and increased molt rate in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Ecotoxicology 23:1464–1473
Carta P, Flore C, Alinovi R, Ibba A, Tocco MG, Aru G, Carta R, Girei E, Mutti A, Lucchini R, Randaccio FS (2003) Sub-clinical neurobehavioral abnormalities associated with low level of mercury exposure through fish consumption. Neurotoxicol 24:617–623
Caudill MT, Spear EL, Varian-Ramos CW, Cristol DA (2015) PHA-Stimulated immune responsiveness in mercury-dosed zebra finches does not match results from environmentally exposed songbirds. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 94:407–411
Champoux L, Boily M, Fitzgerald G (2017) Thyroid hormones, retinol and clinical parameters in relation to mercury and organohalogen contaminants in Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias) nestlings from the St. Lawrence River, Québec, Canada. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 72:200–214
Chen YW, Huang CF, Tsai KS, Yang RS, Yen CC, Yang C, Lin-Shiau SY, Liu SH (2006) Methylmercury induces pancreatic β-cell apoptosis and dysfunction. Chem Res Toxicol 19:1080–1085
Chen YW, Yang CY, Huang CF, Hung DZ, Leung YM, Liu SH (2009) Heavy metals, islet function and diabetes development. Islets 1:169–176
Chen YW, Huang CF, Yang CY, Yen CC, Tsai KS, Liu SH (2010) Inorganic mercury causes pancreatic β-cell death via the oxidative stress-induced apoptotic and necrotic pathways. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 243:323–331
Chernetsov NS (2016) Orientation and navigation of migrating birds. Biol Bull 43:788–803
Clarkson CE, Erwin RM, Riscassi A (2012) The use of novel biomarkers to determine dietary mercury accumulation in nestling waterbirds. Environ ToxicolChem 31:1143–1148
Cnotka J, Möhle M, Rehkämper G (2008) Navigational experience affects hippocampus size in homing pigeons. Brain Behav Evol 72:233–238
Cooper-Mullin C, McWilliams SR (2016) The role of the antioxidant system during intense endurance exercise: lessons from migrating birds. J Exp Biol 219:3684–3695
Costantini D (2008) Oxidative stress in ecology and evolution: lessons from avian studies. Ecol Lett 11:1238–1251
Cristol DA, Reynolds EB, Leclerc JE, Donner AH, Farabaugh CS, Ziegenfus CW (2003) Migratory dark-eyed juncos, (Junco hyemalis), have better spatial memory and denser hippocampal neurons than nonmigratory conspecifics. Anim Behav 66:317–328
Custer CM, Custer TW, Warburton D, Hoffman DJ, Bickham JW, Matson CW (2006) Trace element concentrations and bioindicator responses in tree swallows from northwestern Minnesota. Environ Monit Assess 118:247–266
Custer TW, Custer CM, Johnson KM, Hoffman D (2008) Mercury and other element exposure to tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) nesting on Lostwood National Wildlife Refuge, North Dakota. Environ Pollut 155:217–226
DeLuca WV, Woodworth BK, Rimmer CC, Marra PP, Taylor PD, McFarland KP, Mackenzie SA, Norris DR (2015) Transoceanic migration by a 12-g songbird. Biol Lett 11:20141045
Driscoll CT, Mason RP, Chan HM, Jacob DJ, Pirrone N (2013) Mercury as a global pollutant: sources, pathways, and effects. Environ Sci Technol 47:4967–4983
Driscoll CT, Han YJ, Chen CY, Evers DC, Lambert KF, Holsen TM, Kamman NC, Munson RK (2007) Mercury contamination in forest and freshwater ecosystems in the northeastern United States. BioScience 57:17–28
Dyer CA (2007) Heavy metals as endocrine-disrupting chemicals. In: Gore AC (ed) Endorcrine disrupting chemicals: from basic research to clinical practice. Humana Press, New Jersey, p 111–133
Egeler O, Williams TD, Guglielmo CG (2000) Modulation of lipogenic enzymes, fatty acid synthase and Δ 9-desaturase, in relation to migration in the western sandpiper (Calidris mauri). J Comp Physiol B 170:169–174
Ercal N, Gurer-Orhan H, Aykin-Burns N (2001) Toxic metals and oxidative stress part I: mechanisms involved in metal-induced oxidative damage. Curr Top Med Chem 1:529–539
Evans HL, Garman RH. 1980. Scotopic vision as an indicator of neurotoxicity. In: Merigan WH, Weiss B (Eds) Neurotoxicity of the visual system. Raven Press, New York. pp 135–147
Evans HL, Garman RH, Laties VG (1982) Neurotoxicity of methylmercury in the pigeon. Neurotoxicology 3:21–36
Evers DC, Savoy LJ, DeSorbo CR, Yates DE, Hanson W, Taylor KM, Siegel LS, Cooley Jr JH, Bank MS, Major A, Munney K (2008) Adverse effects from environmental mercury loads on breeding common loons. Ecotoxicology 17:69–81
Feige JN, Gelman L, Michalik L, Desvergne B, Wahli W (2006) From molecular action to physiological outputs: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors are nuclear receptors at the crossroads of key cellular functions. Prog Lipid Res 45:120–159
Figuerola J, Green AJ (2000) Haematozoan parasites and migratory behaviour in waterfowl. Evol Ecol 14:143–153
Fox DA (2015) Retinal and visual system: occupational and environmental toxicology. In: Lotti M, Bleeker ML (eds) Occupational neurology. Elselvier B.V., Amsterdam, p 325–340
Fox DA, Sillman AJ (1979) Heavy metals affect rod, but not cone, photoreceptors. Science 206:78–80
Fujimura M, Usuki F, Sawada M, Takashima A (2009) Methylmercury induces neuropathological changes with tau hyperphosphorylation mainly through the activation of the c-jun-N-terminal kinase pathway in the cerebral cortex, but not in the hippocampus of the mouse brain. Neurotoxicology 30:1000–1007
Gonzalez P, Dominique Y, Massabuau JC, Boudou A, Bourdineaud JP (2005) Comparative effects of dietary methylmercury on gene expression in liver, skeletal muscle, and brain of the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environ Sci Technol 39:3972–3980
Goodridge AG, Ball EG (1967) The effect of prolactin on lipogenesis in the pigeon in vitro studies. Biochemistry 6:2335–2343
Griminger P (1986) Lipid metabolism. In: Sturkie PD (ed) Avian physiology, 4th edn. Springer Verlag, New York, NY, p 345–358
Guglielmo CG (2010) Move that fatty acid: fuel selection and transport in migratory birds and bats. Integr Comp Biol 50:336–345
Gupta PK, Sastry KV (1981) Effect of mercuric chloride on enzyme activities in the digestive system and chemical composition of liver and muscles of the catfish, (Heteropneustes fossilis). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 5:389–400
Hambly C, Harper EJ, Speakman JR (2004) The energetic cost of variations in wing span and wing asymmetry in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttate). J Exp Biol 207:3977–3984
Hamilton M, Scheuhammer A, Basu N (2011) Mercury, selenium and neurochemical biomarkers in different brain regions of migrating common loons from Lake Erie, Canada. Ecotoxicology 20:1677–1683
Hasselquist D, Lindström Å, Jenni-Eiermann S, Koolhaas A, Piersma T (2007) Long flights do not influence immune responses of a long-distance migrant bird: a wind-tunnel experiment. J Exp Biol 210:1123–1131
Hawley DM, Hallinger KK, Cristol DA (2009) Compromised immune competence in free-living tree swallows exposed to mercury. Ecotoxicology 18:499–503
Hawryshyn CW, Mackay WC, Nilsson TH (1982) Methyl mercury induced visual deficits in rainbow trout. Can J Zool 60:3127–3133
Healy SD, Gwinner E, Krebs JR (1996) Hippocampal volume in migratory and non-migratory warblers: effects of age and experience. Behav Brain Res 81:61–68
Heinz GH, Locke LN (1976) Brain lesions in mallard ducklings from parents fed methylmercury. Avian Dis 20:9–17
Henny CJ, Hill EF, Hoffman DJ, Spalding MG, Grove RA (2002) Nineteenth century mercury: hazard to wading birds and cormorants of the Carson River, Nevada. Ecotoxicology 11:213–231
Henry KA, Cristol DA, Varian-Ramos CW, Bradley EL (2015) Oxidative stress in songbirds exposed to dietary methylmercury. Ecotoxicology 24:520–526
Herring G, Eagles‐Smith CA, Ackerman JT (2017) Mercury exposure may influence fluctuating asymmetry in waterbirds. Environ Toxicol Chem 36:1599–1605
Heyers D, Manns M, Luksch H, Güntürkün O, Mouritsen H (2007) A visual pathway links brain structures active during magnetic compass orientation in migratory birds. PLoS One 2:e937
Hoffman DJ, Henny CJ, Hill EF, Grove RA, Kaiser JL, Stebbins KR (2009) Mercury and drought along the Lower Carson River, Nevada: III. Effects on blood and organ biochemistry and histopathology of snowy egrets and black-crowned night-herons on Lahontan Reservoir, 2002–2006. J Toxicol Environ Health A 72:1223–1241
Hoffman DJ, Spalding MG, Frederick PC (2005) Subchronic effects of methylmercury on plasma and organ biochemistries in great egret nestlings. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:3078–3084
Hoffman DJ, Heinz GH (1998) Effects of mercury and selenium on glutathione metabolism and oxidative stress in mallard ducks. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:161–166
Holland RA, Thorup K, Gagliardo A, Bisson IA, Knecht E, Mizrahi D, Wikelski M (2009) Testing the role of sensory systems in the migratory heading of a songbird. J Exp Biol 212:4065–4071
Jenni L, Jenni-Eiermann S (1998) Fuel supply and metabolic constraints in migrating birds. J Avian Biol 29:521–528
Jenni-Eiermann S, Jenni L (1992) High plasma triglyceride levels in small birds during migratory flight: A new pathway for fuel supply during endurance locomotion at very high mass-specific metabolic rates? Physiol Zool 65:112–123
Karasov WH, Martinez del Rio C (2007) Physiological ecology: how animals process energy, nutrients, and toxins. Princeton, New Jersey
Karasov WH, Pinshow B (1998) Changes in lean mass and in organs of nutrient assimilation in a long-distance passerine migrant at a springtime stopover site. Physiol Zool 71:435–438
Kawakami T, Hanao N, Nishiyama K, Kadota Y, Inoue M, Sato M, Suzuki S (2012) Differential effects of cobalt and mercury on lipid metabolism in the white adipose tissue of high-fat diet-induced obesity mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 258:32–42
Kenow KP, Grasman KA, Hines RK, Meyer MW, Gendron‐Fitzpatrick A, Spalding MG, Gray BR (2007) Effects of methylmercury exposure on the immune function of juvenile common loons (Gavia immer). Environ Toxicol Chem 26:1460–1469
Kirby JS, Stattersfield AJ, Butchart SH, Evans MI, Grimmett RF, Jones VR, O’Sullivan J, Tucker GM, Newton I (2008) Key conservation issues for migratory land and waterbird species on the world’s major flyways. Bird Conser Int 18:S49–S73
Klaassen RH, Hake M, Strandberg R, Koks BJ, Trierweiler C, Exo KM, Bairlein F, Alerstam T (2014) When and where does mortality occur in migratory birds? Direct evidence from long-term satellite tracking of raptors. J Anim Ecol 83:176–84
Klaassen M, Hoye BJ, Nolet BA, Buttemer WA (2012) Ecophysiology of avian migration in the face of current global hazards. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367:1719–1732
Klaper R, Carter BJ, Richter CA, Drevnick PE, Sandheinrich MB, Tillitt D (2008) Use of a 15k gene microarray to determine gene expression changes in response to acute and chronic methylmercury exposure in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). J Fish Biol 72:2207–2280
Krause JS, Németh Z, Pérez JH, Chmura HE, Ramenofsky M, Wingfield JC (2016) Annual hematocrit profiles in two subspecies of white-crowned sparrow: a migrant and a resident comparison. Physiol Biochem Zool 89:51–60
Landler L, Painter MS, Coe BH, Youmans PW, Hopkins WA, Phillips JB (2017) High levels of maternally transferred mercury disrupt magnetic responses of snapping turtle hatchlings (Chelydra serpentina). Environ Pollut 228:19–25
Landys-Ciannelli MM, Jukema J, Piersma T (2002) Blood parameter changes during stopover in a long‐distance migratory shorebird, the bar‐tailed godwit (Limosa lapponica taymyrensis). J Avian Biol 33:451–455
Lewis CA, Cristol DA, Swaddle JP, Varian-Ramos CW, Zwollo P (2013) Decreased immune response in zebra finches exposed to sublethal doses of mercury. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 64:327–336
Lindstrom A, Alerstam T (1992) Optimal fat loads in migrating birds: a test of the time-minimization hypothesis. Am Nat 140:477–491
Ma Y, Perez CR, Branfireun BA, Guglielmo CG (2018a) Dietary exposure to methylmercuryaffects flight endurance in a migratory songbird. Environ Pollut 234:894–901
Ma Y, Branfireun BA, Hobson KA, Guglielmo CG (2018b) Evidence of negative seasonal carry-over effects of breeding ground mercury exposure on survival of migratory songbirds. J Avian Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.01656
Marasco V, Costantini D (2016) Signaling in a polluted world: oxidative stress as an overlooked mechanism linking contaminants to animal communication. Front Ecol Evol 4:95
Maués LAL, Macchi BM, Crespo-López ME, Nasciutti LE, Picanço-Diniz DLW, Antunes-Rodrigues J, do Nascimento JLM (2015) Methylmercury inhibits prolactin release in a cell line of pituitary origin. Braz J Med Biol Res 48:691–696
McFarlan JT, Bonen A, Guglielmo CG (2009) Seasonal upregulation of fatty acid transporters in flight muscles of migratory white-throated sparrows (Zonotrichia albicollis). J Exp Biol 212:2934–2940
McWilliams SR, Guglielmo C, Pierce B, Klaassen M (2004) Flying, fasting, and feeding in birds during migration: a nutritional and physiological ecology perspective. J Avian Biol 35:377–393
McWilliams SR, Karasov WH (2014) Spare capacity and phenotypic flexibility in the digestive system of a migratory bird: defining the limits of animal design. Proc R Soc B 281:20140308
Mehlman DW, Mabey SE, Ewert DN, Duncan C, Abel B, Cimprich D, Sutter RD, Woodrey M (2005) Conserving stopover sites for forest-dwelling migratory landbirds. Auk 122:1281–1290
Mela M, Grötzner SR, Legeay A, Mesmer-Dudons N, Massabuau JC, Ventura DF, de Oliveira Ribeiro CA (2012) Morphological evidence of neurotoxicity in retina after methylmercury exposure. Neurotoxicology 33:407–415
Møller AP, Erritzøe J (1998) Host immune defence and migration in birds. Evol Ecol 12:945–953
Morris SR, Holmes DW, Richmond ME (1996) A ten-year study of the stopover patterns of migratory passerines during fall migration on Appledore Island, Maine. Condor 98:395–409
Morton ML (2002) The mountain white-crowned sparrow: migration and reproduction at high altitude. Stud Avian Biol 24
Mouritsen H, Hore PJ (2012) The magnetic retina: Light-dependent and trigeminal magnetoreception in migratory birds. Curr Opin Neurobiol 22:343–352
Mouritsen H, Feenders G, Liedvogel M, Wada K, Jarvis ED (2005) Night-vision brain area in migratory songbirds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:8339–8344
Mouritsen H, Janssen-Bienhold U, Liedvogel M, Feenders G, Stalleicken J, Dirks P, Weiler R (2004) Cryptochromes and neuronal-activity markers colocalize in the retina of migratory birds during magnetic orientation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:14294–14299
Moye JK, Perez CR, Pritsos CA (2016) Effects of parental and direct methylmercury exposure on flight activity in young homing pigeons (Columba livia). Environ Pollut 5:23–30
Nebel S, Bauchinger U, Buehler DM, Langlois LA, Boyles M, Gerson AR, Price ER, McWilliams SR, Guglielmo CG (2012) Constitutive immune function in European starlings, (Sturnus vulgaris), is decreased immediately after an endurance flight in a wind tunnel. J Exp Biol 215:272–278
Newton I (2006) Can conditions experienced during migration limit the population levels of birds? J Ornithol 147:146–166
Norris RD, Marra PP (2007) Seasonal interactions, habitat quality, and population dynamics in migratory birds. Condor 109:535–47
Norris K, Evans MR (2000) Ecological immunology: Life history trade-offs and immune defense in birds. Behav Ecol 11:19–26
North American Bird Conservation Initiative (NABCI) (2016) The state of North America’s birds 2016. Environment and Climate Change Ottawa, Canada
Owen JC, Moore FR (2006) Seasonal differences in immunological condition of three species of thrushes. Condor 108:389–398
Owen JC, Moore FR (2008) Relationship between energetic condition and indicators of immune function in thrushes during spring migration. Can J Zool 86:638–647
Pereira R, Guilherme S, Brandão F, Raimundo J, Santos MA, Pacheco M, Pereira P (2016) Insights into neurosensory toxicity of mercury in fish eyes stemming from tissue burdens, oxidative stress and synaptic transmission profiles. Mar Environ Res 113:70–79
Pierce BJ, McWilliams SR, Place AR, Huguenin MA (2004) Diet preferences for specific fatty acids and their effect on composition of fat reserves in migratory Red-eyed Vireos (Vireo olivaceous). Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 138:503–514
Pollock B, Machin KL (2009) Corticosterone in relation to tissue cadmium, mercury and selenium concentrations and social status of male lesser scaup (Aythya affinis). Ecotoxicology 18:5–14
Pravosudov VV, Kitaysky AS, Omanska A (2006) The relationship between migratory behaviour, memory and the hippocampus: an intraspecific comparison. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 273:2641–2649
Ramenofsky M (2011) Hormones in migration and reproductive cycles of birds. In: Norris DO, Lopez KH (eds) Hormones and reproduction of vertebrates. Academic Press, Amsterdam, p 205–236
Ramenofsky M, Savard R, Greenwood MRC (1999) Seasonal and diel transitions in physiology and behavior in the migratory dark-eyed junco. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 122:385–397
Rice KM, Walker Jr EM, Wu M, Gillette C, Blough ER (2014) Environmental mercury and its toxic effects. J Prev Med Public Health 47:74–83
Richter CA, Martyniuk CJ, Annis ML, Brumbaugh WG, Chasar LC, Denslow ND, Tillitt DE (2014) Methylmercury-induced changes in gene transcription associated with neuroendocrine disruption in largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Gen Comp Endocrinol 203:215–224
Rimmer CC, Miller EK, McFarland KP, Taylor RJ, Faccio SD (2010) Mercury bioaccumulation and trophic transfer in the terrestrial food web of a montane forest. Ecotoxicology 19:697–709
Rimmer CC, McFarland KP, Evers DC, Miller EK, Aubry Y, Busby D, Taylor RJ (2005) Mercury concentrations in Bicknell’s thrush and other insectivorous passerines in montane forests of northeastern North America. Ecotoxicology 14:223–240
Risely A, Klaassen M, Hoye B (2018) Migratory animals feel the cost of getting sick: a meta-analysis across species. J Anim Ecol 87:301–314
Ritz T, Adem S, Schulten K (2000) A model for photoreceptor-based magnetoreception in birds. Biophys J 78:707–718
Sarafian T, Verity MA (1991) Oxidative mechanisms underlying methyl mercury neurotoxicity. Int J Dev Neurosci 9:147–153
Sastry KV, Gupta PK (1980) Changes in the activities of some digestive enzymes of (Channa punctatus), exposed chronically to mercuric chloride. J Environ Sci Health B 15:109–119
Sastry KV, Rao DR (1984) Effect of mercuric chloride on some biochemical and physiological parameters of the freshwater murrel, Channa punctatus. Environ Res 34:343–350
Schaub M, Jenni L, Bairlein F (2008) Fuel stores, fuel accumulation, and the decision to depart from a migration stopover site. Behav Ecol 19:657–666
Scheuhammer AM, Meyer MW, Sandheinrich MB, Murray MW (2007) Effects of environmental methylmercury on the health of wild birds, mammals, and fish. Ambio 36:12–19
Schumacher L, Abbott LC (2017) Effects of methyl mercury exposure on pancreatic beta cell development and function. J Appl Toxicol 37:4–12
Scoville SA, Lane OP (2013) Cerebellar abnormalities typical of methylmercury poisoning in a fledged saltmarsh sparrow (Ammodramus caudacutus). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 90:616–620
Seewagen CL, Cristol DA, Gerson AR (2016) Mobilization of mercury from lean tissues during simulated migratory fasting in a model songbird. Sci Rep 6:25762
Seewagen CL (2013) Blood mercury levels and the stopover refueling performance of a long-distance migratory songbird. Can J Zool 91:41–45
Seewagen CL, Guglielmo CG (2011) Quantitative magnetic resonance analysis and a morphometric predictive model reveal lean body mass changes in migrating Nearctic–Neotropical passerines. J Comp Physiol B 181:413–421
Seewagen CL (2010) Threats of environmental mercury to birds: knowledge gaps and priorities for future research. Bird Conserv Int 20:112–123
Selin NE (2009) Global biogeochemical cycling of mercury: a review. Annu Rev Environ Resour 34:43–63
Sepúlveda MS, Williams Jr GE, Frederick PC, Spalding MG (1999) Effects of mercury on health and first-year survival of free-ranging great egrets (Ardea albus) from southern Florida. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 37:369–376
Sharma JM (1991) Overview of the avian immune system. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 30:13–17
Sherry DF, Hoshooley JS (2007) Neurobiology of spatial behavior. In: Otter KA (ed) Ecology and behavior of chickadees and tits: an integrated approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 9–23
Shimizu T, Bowers AN, Budzynski CA, Kahn MC, Bingman VP (2004) What does a pigeon (Columba livia) brain look like during homing? selective examination of ZENK expression. Behav Neurosci 118:845–851
Sillett T Scott, Holmes RT (2002) Variation in survivorship of a migratory songbird throughout its annual cycle J Anim Ecol 71:296–308
Skrip MM, McWilliams SR (2016) Oxidative balance in birds: an atoms to organisms to ecology primer for ornithologists. J Field Ornithol 87:1–20
Soldin OP, O’Mara DM, Aschner M (2008) Thyroid hormones and methylmercury toxicity. Biol Trace Elem Res 126:1
Solov’yov IA, Mouritsen H, Schulten K (2010) Acuity of a cryptochrome and vision-based magnetoreception system in birds. Biophys J 99:40–49
Spalding MG, Frederick PC, McGill HC, Bouton SN, Richey L, Schumacher IM, Blackmore GM, Harrison J (2000a) Histologic, neurologic, and immunologic effects of methylmercury in captive great egrets J Wildl Dis 36:423–435
Spalding MG, Frederick PC, McGill HC, Bouton SN, McDowell LR (2000b) Methylmercury accumulation in tissues and its effects on growth and appetite in captive great egrets J Wildl Dis 36:411–422
Stapput K, Thalau P, Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W (2008) Orientation of birds in total darkness. Curr Biol 18:602–606
Stohs SJ, Bagchi D (1995) Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of metal ions. Free Radic Biol Med 18:321–336
Strasser R, Bingman VP, Ioalé P, Casini G, Bagnoli P (1998) The homing pigeon hippocampus and the development of landmark navigation. Dev Psychobiol 33:305–315
Swaddle JP, Diehl TR, Taylor CE, Fanaee AS, Benson JL, Huckstep NR, Cristol DA (2017) Exposure to dietary mercury alters cognition and behavior of zebra finches. Curr Zool 63:213–219
Tan SW, Meiller JC, Mahaffey KR (2009) The endocrine effects of mercury in humans and wildlife. Crit Rev Toxicol 39:228–269
Tartu S, Angelier F, Wingfield JC, Bustamante P, Labadie P, Budzinski H, Weimerskirch H, Bustnes JO, Chastel O (2015) Corticosterone, prolactin and egg neglect behavior in relation to mercury and legacy POPs in a long-lived Antarctic bird. Sci Total Environ 505:180–188
Tessier-Lavigne M, Mobbs P, Attwell D (1985) Lead and mercury toxicity and the rod light response. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26:1117–1123
Thaxton P, Parkhurst CR (1973) Toxicity of mercury to young chickens 3: changes in immunological responsiveness. Poult Sci 52:761–764
Thomas AL (1993) The aerodynamic costs of asymmetry in the wings and tail of birds: asymmetric birds can’t fly round tight corners. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 254:181–189
Tinkov AA, Ajsuvakova OP, Skalnaya MG, Popova EV, Sinitskii AI, Nemereshina ON, Gatiatulina ER, Nikonorov AA, Skalny AV (2015) Mercury and metabolic syndrome: a review of experimental and clinical observations. Biometals 28:231–254
Van Gils JA, Munster VJ, Radersma R, Liefhebber D, Fouchier RA, Klaassen M (2007) Hampered foraging and migratory performance in swans infected with low-pathogenic avian influenza A virus. PloS One 2:e184
Ventura DF, Simoes AL, Tomaz S, Costa MF, Lago M, Costa MTV, Rodrigues AR, Saito C, Silveira LCL (2005) Colour vision and contrast sensitivity losses of mercury intoxicated industry workers in Brazil. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 19:523–529
Wada H, Cristol DA, McNabb FA, Hopkins WA (2009) Suppressed adrenocortical responses and thyroid hormone levels in birds near a mercury-contaminated river. Environ Sci Technol 43:6031–6038
Warfvinge K, Bruun A (1996) Mercury accumulation in the squirrel monkey eye after mercury vapour exposure. Toxicology 107:189–200
Weber JM (2011) Metabolic fuels: regulating fluxes to select mix. J Exp Biol 214:286–294
Wingfield JC, Breuner CW, Jacobs J (1997) Corticosterone and behavioral responses to unpredictable events. In: Harvey S, Etches RJ (eds.) Perspectives in avian endocrinology. Journal of Endocrinology Press, Bristol, pp 267–278
Wittenberg BA, Wittenberg JB (1989) Transport of oxygen in muscle. Annu Rev Physiol 51:857–878
Whitney MC, Cristol DA (2017) Impacts of sublethal mercury exposure on birds: a detailed review. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 244:113–163
Wolfe MF, Schwarzbach S, Sulaiman RA (1998) Effects of mercury on wildlife: a comprehensive review. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:146–160
Yadetie F, Karlsen OA, Lanzén A, Berg K, Olsvik P, Hogstrand C, Goksøyr A (2013) Global transcriptome analysis of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) liver after in vivo methylmercury exposure suggests effects on energy metabolism pathways. Aquat Toxicol 126:314–325
Ynalvez R, Gutierrez J, Gonzalez-Cantu H (2016) Mini-review: toxicity of mercury as a consequence of enzyme alteration. BioMetals 29:781–788
Zapka M, Heyers D, Hein CM, Engels S, Schneider NL, Hans J, Weiler S, Dryer D, Kishkinev D, Wild JM, Mouritsen H (2009) Visual but not trigeminal mediation of magnetic compass information in a migratory bird. Nature 461:1274–1277
Acknowledgements
Daniel A. Cristol, Alexander R. Gerson, Yanju Ma, Christopher G. Guglielmo, and three anonymous reviewers provided helpful ideas and comments on previous versions of the manuscript. I also thank Daniel Cristol for the invitation and encouragement to write this article for the Special Issue. Financial support for the preparation of the manuscript was provided by the Great Hollow Nature Preserve & Ecological Research Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seewagen, C.L. The threat of global mercury pollution to bird migration: potential mechanisms and current evidence. Ecotoxicology 29, 1254–1267 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-018-1971-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-018-1971-z