Abstract
Values for non-market goods can be expected to be sensitive to variations in the cultural contexts of beneficiaries. However, little progress has been made to date in adapting benefit transfer (BT) procedures for cultural variations. Using information from a study that ranked 62 societies with respect to nine attributes of their cultures, we develop an index that is then used to re-weight multiple coastal ecosystem service value estimates. We examine whether these culturally-adjusted BT estimates are statistically different than simply transferring the income-adjusted mean transfer estimates for each coastal ecosystem service from international study sites to the policy site. We find that once differences in income levels have been accounted for, the differences in cultural dimensions between study and policy sites actually have little impact on the magnitude of our transfer estimates. This is not a surprising result given that the majority of the study site estimates are derived from countries that share many ethnic, linguistic and other cultural similarities to the policy site. However, benefit adjustments based on cultural factors could have a much higher impacts in settings different to that investigated here.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alberini A, Cropper M, Tsu-Tan F, Krupnick A, Jin-Tan L, Shaw D, Harrington W (1997) Valuing health effects of air pollution in developing countries: the case of Taiwan. J Environ Econ Manag 34: 107–126
Alvarez-Farizo B, Hanley N (2006) Improving the process of valuing non-market benefits: combining citizens’ juries with choice modelling. Land Econ 82(3): 465–478
Barbier EB, Hacker S, Kennedy C, Koch E, Stier A, Silliman B (2011) The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol Monogr 81(2): 169–193
Barry L, van Rensburg T, Hynes S (2011) Improving the recreational value of Ireland’s coastal resources: a contingent behavioural application. Mar Policy 35: 764–771
Barton D, Mourato S (2003) Transferring the benefits of avoided health Effects from Water pollution between Portugal and Costa Rica. Environ Dev Econ 8: 351–371
Bateman I, Ennew C, Lovett A, Rayner A (1999) Modelling and mapping agricultural output values using farm specific details and environmental databases. J Agric Econ 50: 488–511
Bateman I, Jones A, Nishikawa N, Brouwer R (2000) Benefits transfer in theory and practice: a review and some new studies. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE) and School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich
Bateman I, Day B, Georgiou S, Lake I (2006) The aggregation of environmental benefit values: welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP. Ecol Econ 60: 450–460
Bateman I, Brouwer R, Cranford M, Hime S, Ozdemiroglu E, Phang Z, Provins A (2009) Valuing environmental impacts: practical guidelines for the use of value transfer in policy and project appraisal. Value transfer guidelines. Eftec, London. Submitted to Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), Dec 2009. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/policy/natural-environ/using/valuation/index.htm
Beaumont NJ, Austen MC, Atkins JP, Burdon D, Degraer S, Dentinho TP, Derous S, Holm P, Horton T, van Ierland E, Marboe AH, Starkey DJ, Townsend M, Zarzycki T (2007) Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: implications for the ecosystem approach. Mar Pollut Bull 54: 253–265
Blamey R, Common M, Quiggin J (1995) Respondnts to contingent valuation surveys: consumers or citizens?. Aust J Agric Econ 39: 263–288
Brenner J, Jiménez J, Sardá R, Garola A (2010) An assessment of the nonmarket value of the ecosystem services provided by the Catalan coastal zone, Spain. Ocean Coast Manag 53: 27–38
Brondizio E, Gatzweiler F, Zagrafos C et al (2010) Socio-cultural context of ecosystem and biodiversity valuation. In: McNeely J et al (ed) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity (TEEB). United Nations Environmental Programme and the European Commission, Brussels
CEC (2000) Directive of the European parliament and of the council 2000/60/EC establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Communities L327/1:72
Colombo S, Hanley N (2008) How can we reduce the errors from benefits transfer? An investigation using the choice experiment method. Land Econ 84: 128–147
Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neil R, Paruelo J, Raskin R, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260
CSO (2010) Cenus 2006—interactive tables. http://www.cso.ie/census/. Accessed 28 June 2010
Devillers P, Devillers-Terschuren J, Ledant J (1991) CORINE biotopes manual: a method to identify and describe consistently sites of major importance for nature conservation. Data specifications—part 2 (EUR 12587/3 EN). Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg
Dietz T, Fitzgerald A, Shwom R (2005) Environmental values. Ann Rev Environ Resour 30: 335–372
Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) (2004) A national survey of water-based leisure activities in Ireland 2003. http://www.esri.ie/publications/search_for_a_publication/search_results/view/index.xml?id=1941. Accessed 17 July 2010 (online)
Failte Ireland (2011) Tourism regions data. http://www.failteireland.ie/Research-Statistics/Tourism-Facts/Tourism-Regions Accessed 12 Aug 2011 (online)
Furnham A, Kirkcaldy B, Lynn R (1994) National attitudes to competitiveness, money and work amongst young people: first, second and third world differences. Hum Relat 47: 119–132
Garpe K (2008) Ecosystem services provided by the Baltic Sea and Skagerrak. Swedish EPA, Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm
Ghermandi A, van den Bergh J, Brander L, de Groot H, Nunes P (2010) The values of natural and human-made wetlands: a meta-analysis. Water Resour Res 46: W12516
Hanley N, Barbier E (2009) Pricing nature: cost-benefit analysis and environmental policy-making. Edward Elgar, London
Hanley N, Ready R, Colombo S, Watson F, Stewart M, Bergmann EA (2008) The impacts of knowledge of the past on preferences for future landscape change. J Environ Manag 90: 1404–1412
Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, Gintis H, McElreath R (2001) In search of homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Am Econ Rev 91: 73–78
Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
Hornborg A, McNeill J, Martinez-Alier J (2007) Rethinking environmental history: world-system history and global environmental change. Altamira Press, Lanham
House R, Hanges P, Javidan M, Dorfman P, Gupta V (2004) Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA
Howley P, Hynes S, O’Donoghue C (2010) The citizen versus consumer distinction: An exploration of individuals’ preferences in contingent valuation studies. Ecol Econ 69: 1524–1531
Hoyos D, Mariel P, Fernandez-Macho J (2009) The influence of cultural identity on the WTP to protect natural resources: some empirical evidence. Ecol Econ 68: 2372–2381
Hussain S, Winrow-Griffen A, Moran D, Robinson L, Fofana A, Paramor O, Frid C (2010) An ex ante ecological economic assessment of the benefits arising from marine protected areas in the UK. Ecol Econ 69: 828–838
Hynes S, Hanley N, O’Donoghue C (2007) Using spatial microsimulation techniques in the aggregation of environmental benefit values: an application to corncrake conservation on Irish farmland. In: Envecon 2007: applied environmental economics conference, organised by the UK Network of Environmental Economists (UKNEE), London, Friday, 23 March 2007
Hynes S, Hanley N, O’Donoghue C (2010) A combinatorial optimization approach to non-market environmental benefit aggregation via simulated populations. Land Econ 86: 345–362
Hynes S, Scully C, Browne A (2011) Valuing marine environmental characteristics associated with changes to the EU bathing water directive. Paper presented at the 3rd annual Beaufort marine socio-economic symposium, at the National University of Ireland, Galway, 11 Nov 2011
Inglehart R, Baker W (2000) Modernization, cultural change and the persistence of traditional values. Am Sociol Rev 65: 19–51
Jacobsen JB, Hanley N (2009) Are there income effects on global willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation?. Environ Resour Econ 43: 137–160
Johnston R, Rosenberger R (2010) Methods, trends and controversies in contemporary benefit transfer. J Econ Surv 24: 479–510
Lindhjem H, Navrud S (2009) Asking for individual or household willingness to pay for environmental goods? Implications for aggregate welfare measures. Environ Resour Econ 43: 11–29
Liu S (2007) Valuing ecosystem services: an ecological economic approach. PhD thesis, Faculty of the Graduate College, The University of Vermont
Loomis J (1992) The evolution of a more rigorous approach to benefit transfer: benefit function transfer. Water Resour Res 28: 701–705
McVittie A, Moran D (2010) Valuing the non-use benefits of marine conservation zones: an application to the UK Marine Bill. Ecol Econ 70: 413–424
MEA: (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC
NPWS (National Parks and Wildlife Services) (2005) Surveys of sensitive subtidal benthic communities in Kilkieran Bay and Islands SAC and Kingstown Bay SAC. Report prepared by MERC Consultants. http://www.npws.ie/en/media/NPWS/Publications/Marine/Media,6636,en.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2010 (online)
NPWS (National Parks and Wildlife Services) (2010) Galway—special areas of conservation. http://www.npws.ie/en/en/ProtectedSites/SpecialAreasofConservationSACs/. Accessed 23 July 2010
Navrud S (2007) Practical tools for benefit transfer in Denmark—guidelines and examples. Report to the Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen
Navrud S, Ready R (2007) Environmental value transfer: issues and methods. Springer, Kluwer, Dordrect
Nunes PALD, Blaeij A, ven den Bergh J (2009) Decomposition of warm glow for multiple stakeholders: stated choice valuation of shellfish policy. Land Econ 85(3): 485–499
Ojea E, Loureiro M (2007) Altruistic, egoistic and biospheric values in willingness to pay (WTP) for wildlife. Ecol Econ 63: 807–814
Pearce D (2003) conceptual framework for analysing the distributive impacts of environmental policies. Report prepared for the OECD Environment Directorate workshop on the distribution of benefits and costs of environmental policies, Paris, March 2003. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~uctpa36/oecd%20distribution.pdf. Accessed 23 Aug 2011
Posthuma R (2009) National culture and union membership: a cultural-cognitive perspective. Ind Relat 64: 507–529
Pouta E (2004) Attitude and belief questions as a source of context effect in a contingent valuation survey. J Econ Psychol 25: 229–242
Ready R, Navrud S, Day B, Dubourg R, Machado F, Mourato S, Spanninks F, Rodriquez M (2004) Benefit transfer in Europe: how reliable are transfers between countries?. Environ Resour Econ 29: 67–82
Ronen S, Shenkar O (1985) Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: a review and synthesis. Acad Manag Rev 10: 435–454
Rosenberger R, Stanley T (2006) Measurement, generalization, and publication: sources of error in benefit transfers and their management. Ecol Econ 60: 372–378
Rozan A (2004) Benefit transfer: a comparison of WTP for air quality between France and Germany. Environ Resour Econ 29: 295–306
Shi X, Wang J (2011) Cultural distance between China and US across GLOBE model and the Hofstede model. Int Bus Manag 2: 1–7
Shrestha R, Loomis J (2001) Testing a meta-analysis model for benefit transfer in international outdoor recreation. Ecol Econ 39: 67–83
Smith P (2002) Culture’s consequences: something old and something new. Hum Relat 55: 119–137
Spash C (2000) Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: the case of wetland recreation. Ecol Econ 34: 195–215
Spash CL, Vatn A (2006) Transferring environmental value estimates: issues and alternatives. Ecol Econ 60: 379–388
Stern P, Dietz T, Guagnano G (1995) The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. J Environ Econ Manag 26: 271–292
Troy A, Wilson MA (2006) Mapping ecosystem services: practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. Ecol Econ 60: 435–449
Turner R, Bateman I, Adger W (2000) Economics of coastal and water resources: valuing environmental function, studies in ecological economics series, vol 3. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Wilk R, Cliggett L (2006) Economies and cultures: foundations of economic anthropology. Westview Press, Boulder, CO
Wilson M, Liu S (2008) Evaluating the non-market value of ecosystem goods and services provided by coastal and nearshore marine systems. In: Patterson M, Glavovic B (eds) Ecological economics of the oceans and coasts. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA
World Values Survey Association (2009) World values survey 1981–2008 official aggregate v.20090901. Aggregate file producer: ASEP/JDS, Madrid. www.worldvaluessurvey.org
Zhai G, Suzuki T (2009) International benefit transfer related to coastal zones: evidence from Northeast Asia. Mar Resour Econ 24: 171–186
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hynes, S., Norton, D. & Hanley, N. Adjusting for Cultural Differences in International Benefit Transfer. Environ Resource Econ 56, 499–519 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9572-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9572-4