Abstract
Generating ecological production functions, including harvest yield functions, is a high priority research area. Most yield functions used in economics and ecology rely on convexity properties of species growth functions, but convexity is shown here to depend on whether realistic biology is incorporated. Optimizing behavior by individual organisms is connected with species population dynamics in order to derive growth functions in a general equilibrium ecosystem model. Non convexities are shown to be an inherent property of the growth functions owing to familiar biological processes including predator-prey and competitive relations, predator satiation and prey substitution. The growth functions generate yield functions that are problematic for management, because they exhibit kinked average revenue curves, discontinuous marginal revenue curves, and knife edge optimum effort levels where a small increase above the optimum effort can rapidly deplete the stock. These phenomena can be explained entirely by the underlying biological processes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abrams PA (1999) The adaptive dynamics of consumer choice. Am Nat 153: 83–97
Bateman IJ, Mace GM, Fezzi C, Atkinson G, Turner K (2011) Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environ Resour Econ 48: 177–218
Berryman AA (1992) The origins and evolution of predator-prey theory. Ecology 73(5): 1530–1535
Beverton RJH, Holt SJ (1957) On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. Chapman and Hall, London
Borisov VM (1978) The selection effect of fishing on the population structure of species with a long life cycle. J Ichthyol 18: 846–904
Boukal DS, Berec LK (2002) Single-species models of the Allee effect: extinction boundaries, sex ratios and mate encounters. J Theor Biol 218(3): 375–394
Brown GM Jr., Berger B, Ikiara M (2005) A predator-prey model with an application to Lake Victoria fisheries. Marine Resour Econ 20: 221–247
Bulte EH (2003) Open access harvesting of wildlife: the poaching pit and conservation of endangered species. Agric Econ 28: 27–37
Bulte EH, Damania R (2003) Managing ecologically interdependent species. Nat Resour Model 16: 21–38
Christiaans T, Eichner T, Pethig R (2007) A micro-level ‘consumer approach’ to population dynamics. Nat Resour Model 20: 279–322
Clark C (1976) Mathematical bioeconomics: the optimal management of renewable resources, 1st edn, 1990 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Dasgupta P, Mäler KG (2004) The economics of non-convex ecosystems: introduction. In: Dasgupta P, Mäler KG (eds) The economics of non-convex ecosystems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 1–28
Edeline E et al (2007) Trait changes in a harvested population are driven by a dynamic tug-of-war between natural and harvest selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(40): 15799–15804
Eichner T, Pethig R (2003) The impact of scarcity and abundance in food chains on species population dynamics. Natural Resource Model 16: 259–303
Eichner T, Pethig R (2005) Ecosystem and economy: an integrated dynamic general equilibrium approach. J Econ 85: 213–249
Eichner T, Pethig R (2006) A microfoundation of predator-prey dynamics. Nat Resour Model 19: 279–322
Eichner T, Pethig R (2009) Pricing the ecosystem and taxing ecosystem services: a general equilibrium approach. J Econ Theory 144(4): 1589–1616
Environmental Protection Agency, United States (2009) Valuing the protection of ecological systems and services. Science Advisory Board. EPA-SAB-09-012
Finnoff D, Tschirhart J (2003) Protecting an endangered species while harvesting its prey in a general equilibrium ecosystem model. Land Econ 79: 160–180
Finnoff D, Tschirhart J (2003) Harvesting in an eight species ecosystem. J Environ Econ Manag 45(3): 589–611
Finnoff D, Tschirhart J (2008) Linking dynamic ecological and economic general equilibrium models. Resour Energy Econ 30: 91–114
Finnoff D, Tschirhart J (2010) Inserting ecological detail into economic analysis: agricultural nutrient loading of an estuary fishery. In: Smith VK (ed) (Forthcoming chapter)
Fryxell JM, Lundberg P (1998) Individual behavior and community dynamics. Chapman & Hall, New York
Garrod GJ (1988) North Atlantic cod: fisheries and management to 1986, 2nd edn. Wiley, London
Gleeson SK, Wilson DS (1986) Equilibrium diet: Optimum foraging and prey coexistence. Oikos 46: 139–144
Gurney WSC, Nisbet RM (1998) Ecological dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York
Hanley N, Barbier EB (2009) Pricing nature: cost benefit analysis and environmental policy. Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., Northhampton
Hannesson R (1983) Optimal harvesting of ecologically interdependent fish species. J Environ Econ Manag 10: 329–345
Hartwick JM, Olewiler ND (1998) The economics of natural resource use, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, New York
Holling CS (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can Entomologist 91(7): 385–398
Hussain AMT, Tschirhart J (2010) Economic/ecological tradeoffs among ecosystem services: hunting, grazing and naturalness. Working paper, Department of Economics and Finance, University of Wyoming
Hutchings JA (1996) Spatial and temporal variation in the density of northern cod and a review of hypotheses for the stock’s collapse. Can J Fish Aquatic Sci 53: 943–962
Kagel JH, Battalio RC, Green L (1995) Economic choice theory: an experimental analysis of animal behavior. Cambridge University Press, New York
Kim SHH, Buskirk S, Tschirhart J (2007) Reconstructing past ecosystem processes with general equilibrium models: house mice in Kern County, California, 1926–1927. Ecol Model 209: 235–248
Lang GM, Livingston PA, Miller BS (1995) Food habits of three congeneric flatfishes: yellowfin sole (Pleuronextes asper), flathead sole (P. bilineatus) and Alaska plaice (P. quadrituberculatus) in the Eastern Bering Sea. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on North Pacific flatfish, Univ. Alaska Sea Grant College Program Rep. 95-04, pp 225–245
Law R (2000) Fishing, selection, and phenotypic evolution. ICES J Marine Sci 57: 659–668
Lima SL (1998) Stress and decision-making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. Adv Study Behav 27: 215–290
Lotka AJ (1925) Elements of physical biology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
May RM, Oster GF (1976) Bifurcations and dynamic complexity in simple ecological models. The Am Nat 110(974): 573–599
Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.
Moran PAP (1950) Some remarks on animal population dynamics. Biometrics 6: 250–258
Murphy GI (1967) Vital statistics of the Pacific sardine (Sardinops caerulea) and the population consequences. Ecology 48: 731–736
Naeem S, Bunker DE, Hector A, Loreau M, Perrings C et al (2009) Introduction: the ecological and social implication of changing biodiversity. In: Naeem S (eds) Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and human wellbeing. Oxford University Press, New York
National Research Council: (2005) Valuing ecosystem services. National Academies Press, Washington D.C.
Owen-Smith N, Mills MGL (2008) Shifting prey selection generates contrasting herbivore dynamics within a large-mammal predatyor-prey web. Ecology 89(4): 1120–1133
Pennycuick CJ (1979) Energy costs of locomotion and the concept of “foraging radius”. In: Sinclair ARE, Norton-Griffiths M (eds) Serengeti: dynamics of an ecosystem. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 164–184
Ragozin DL, Brown GM Jr. (1985) Harvest policies and nonmarket valuation in a predator-prey system. J Environ Econ Manag 12: 155–168
Redford KH, Feinsinger P (2001) The half-empty forest: sustainable use and the ecology of interactions. In: Reynolds JD, Mace GM, Redford KH, Robinson JG (eds) Conservation of exploited species. Cambridge Universty Press, New York, pp 370–399
Ricker WE (1954) Stock and recruitment. J Fish Res Board Can 11: 559–623
Roughgarden J (1998) How to manage fisheries. Ecol App 8(1): S160–S164
Skalski GT, Gilliam JF (2001) Functional responses with predator interference: viable alternatives to the Holling Type II model. Ecology 82(11): 3083–3092
Smith VL (1969) On models of commercial fishing. J Political Econ 77(2): 181–198
Smith MD (2004) Fishing yield, curvature and spatial behavior: implications for modeling marine reserves. Nat Resour Model 17(3): 273–298
Solow AR, Beet AR (1998) On lumping species in food webs. Ecology 79(6): 2013–2018
Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Ströbele WJ, Wacker H (1991) The concept of sustainable yield in multi-species fisheries. Ecological Model 53: 61–74
Swallow SK, Parks PJ, Wear DN (1990) Policy-relevant nonconvexities in the production of multiple forest benefits. J Environ Econ Manag 19(3): 264–280
Tschirhart J (2000) General equilibrium of an ecosystem. J Theor Biol 203: 13–32
Tschirhart J (2004) A new adaptive system approach to predator-prey modeling. Ecol Model 176: 255–276
Tschirhart J (2009) Models integrating ecology and economics. Annu Rev Resour Econ 1: 381–409
Tu PNV, Wilman EA (1992) A generalized predator-prey model: uncertainty and management. J Environ Econ Manag 23: 123–138
Volterra V (1926) Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically. Nature 118: 558–560
Whipple SJ, Link JS, Garrison LP, Fogarty MJ (2000) Models of predation and fishing mortality in aquatic ecosystems. Fish Fish 1: 22–40
Wilen JE, Brown GM Jr. (1986) Optimal recovery paths for perturbations of trophic level bioeconomic systems. J Environ Econ Manag 13: 225–234
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tschirhart, J. Biology as a Source of Non-convexities in Ecological Production Functions. Environ Resource Econ 51, 189–213 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9494-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9494-6