Abstract
While many studies have looked at innovation and adoption of technologies separately, the two processes are linked. Advances (and expected advances) in a single technology should affect both its adoption rate and the adoption of alternative technologies. This paper combines plant-level data on US coal-fired electric power plants with patent data pertaining to NOX pollution control techniques to study this link. As in other studies of environmental technologies, the effect of other explanatory variables is dominated by the effect of environmental regulations, demonstrating that the mere presence of environmental technologies is not enough to encourage its usage. Nonetheless, I do find that technological advances are important for the adoption of existing combustion modification technologies. However, these advances are less important for the adoption of newer post-combustion control techniques, which are adopted only when needed to comply with the strictest emission limits.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Afonso R, Tatsutani M, Roskelley TJ et al (2000) The regulation of NOX emissions from coal-fired boilers: a case study. In: Environmental regulation and technology innovation: controlling mercury emissions from coal-fired boilers. Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management, Boston
Balcer Y, Lippman SA (1984) Technological expectations and adoption of improved technology. J Econ Theory 34(2): 292–318
Cooper R, Haltwanger J, Power L (1999) Machine replacement and the business cycle: lumps and bumps. Amer Econ Rev 89(4): 921–946
Cox DR, Oakes D (1985) Analysis of survival data. Chapman and Hall, London
David PA (1969) Contribution to the theory of diffusion. Stanford Center for Research in Economic Growth, Memorandum #71, Stanford University, Stanford
Davies SW (1979) The diffusion of process innovations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Energy Information Administration (1997) The effects of title IV of the Clean Air Act amendments of 1990 on electric utilities: an update DOE/EIA-0582(97). US Department of Energy, Washington
Gray WB, Shadbegian RJ (1998) Environmental regulation, investment timing, and technology choice. J Ind Econ 46(2): 235–256
Griliches Z (1995) R&D and productivity: econometric results and measurement issues. In: Stoneman PL Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change. Blackwell, Cambridge pp 52–89
Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. J Econ Lit 28(4): 1661–1707
Griliches Z (1957) Hybrid corn: an exploration of the economics of technological change. Econometrica 25: 501–522
Hannan TH, McDowell JM (1984) The determinants of technology adoption: the case of the banking firm. RAND J Econ 15(3): 328–335
Ireland N, Stoneman PL (1986) Technological diffusion, expectations, and welfare. Oxford Econ Pap 38: 283–304
Jaffe B, Newell RG, Stavins RN (2003) Technological change and the environment. In: MälerKG Vincent J Handbook of environmental economics. North Holland, Amsterdam pp 461–506
Karshenas M, Stoneman PL (1995) Technological diffusion. In: Stoneman PL Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change. Blackwell, Cambridge pp 265–297
Karshenas M, Stoneman PL (1993) Rank, stock, order, and epidemic effects in the diffusion of new process technologies: an empirical model. RAND J Econ 24(4): 503–528
Kerr S, Newell RG (2003) Policy-induced technology adoption: evidence from the U.S. lead phasedown. J Ind Econ 51(3): 317–343
Kiefer N (1988) Economic duration data and hazard functions. J Econ Lit 26: 646–679
Lancaster T (1990) The econometric analysis of transition data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Levin RC, Klevorick AK, Nelson RR et al (1987) Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Pap Econ Act 3: 783–820
Lissoni F (2000) Technological expectations and the diffusion of ‘intermediate’ technologies. Econ Innov New Tech 9: 487–515
Mansfield E (1968) Industrial research and technological innovation. W.W. Norton, New York
McConville A (1997) Emission standards handbook. IEA Coal Research, London
Nilsen ØA, Schiantarelli F (2003) Zeros and lumps in investment: empirical evidence on irreversibilities and nonconvexities. Rev Econ Statist 85(4): 1021–1037
Oster S (1982) The diffusion of innovation among steel firms: the basic oxygen furnace. Bell J Econ 13(1): 45–56
Popp D (2006) International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies: the effects of NOX and SO2 regulation in the U.S., Japan, and Germany. J Environ Econ Manage 51(1): 46–71
Popp D (2005) Lessons from patents: using patents to measure technological change in environmental models. Ecol Econ 54(2-3): 209–226
Popp D (2003) Pollution control innovations and the Clean Air Act of 1990. J Pol Anal Manage 22(4): 641–660
Popp D (2001) The effect of new technology on energy consumption. Resour Energy Econ 23(3): 215–239
Rose NL, Joskow PL (1990) The diffusion of new technologies: evidence from the electric utility industry. RAND J Econ 21(3): 354–373
Rosenberg N (1976) On technological expectations. Econ J 86: 523–535
Sloss LL (2003) Trends in emission standards. IEA Coal Research, London
Snyder LD, Miller NH, Stavins RN (2003) The effects of environmental regulation on diffusion: the case of chlorine manufacturing. Am Econ Rev 93(2): 431–435
Soud HN (1991) Emission standards handbook: air pollutant standards for coal-fired power plants. IEA Coal Research, London
Stoneman PL, Kwon MJ (1994) The diffusion of multiple process technologies. Econ J 104: 420–431
Stoneman PL, Toivanen O (1997) The diffusion of multiple technologies: an empirical study. Econ Innov New Tech 5: 1–17
Tsur Y, Sternberg M, Hochman E (1990) Dynamic modelling of innovation process adoption with risk aversion and learning. Oxford Econ Pap 42(2): 336–355
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation (2004) NOX budget trading program: 2003 progress and compliance report. Washington
Vernon JL (1988) Emission standards for coal-fired plants: air pollutant control policies. IEA Coal Research, London
Weiss AM (1994) The effects of expectations on technological adoption: some empirical evidence. J Ind Econ 42(4): 341–360
Wu Z (2002) NOX control for pulverized coal fired power stations. IEA Coal Research, London
Wu Z (2001) Air pollution control costs for coal-fired power stations. IEA Coal Research, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Popp, D. Exploring Links Between Innovation and Diffusion: Adoption of NOX Control Technologies at US Coal-fired Power Plants. Environ Resource Econ 45, 319–352 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9317-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9317-1