Abstract
Choice experiments are designed to account for variations in environmental resources and site characteristics, as well as potential implications of these variations for willingness to pay. As a result, choice experiment results may be well suited for benefits transfer. It is unclear, however, whether the flexibility of choice experiments renders the similarity of study and transfer sites less critical for transfer validity. Drawing from identical choice experiments conducted in different Rhode Island communities, this model assesses the extent to which error in function-based benefits transfer is related to the similarity of communities across a variety of observable dimensions. Results suggest that site similarity, at least across some dimensions, influences the validity of choice experiment benefits transfers. However, the use of some measures of similarity as indicators of transfer error may provide misleading results.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adamowicz W, Boxall P, Williams M, Louviere J (1998) Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. Am J Agr Econ 80(1):64–75
Adamowicz W, DeShazo JR (2006) Frontiers in stated preferences methods: an introduction. Environ Resour Econ 34(1):1–6
Allison PD (1999) Comparing logit and probit coefficients across groups. Sociolo Method Res 28(2):186–208
Barton DN (2002) The transferability of benefit transfer: contingent valuation of water quality improvements in Costa Rica. Ecol Econ 42(1–2):147–164
Bergstrom JC, De Civita P (1999) Status of benefits transfer in the United States and Canada: a review. Can J Agr Econ 47(1):79–87
Boxall PC, Adamowicz WL, Swait J, Williams M, Louviere J (1996) A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecol Econ 18(3):243–253
Boyle KJ, Bergstrom JC (1992) Benefit transfer studies: myths, pragmatism, and idealism. Water Resour Res 28(3):657–663
Desvousges WH, Naughton MC, Parsons GR (1992) Benefit transfer: conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies. Water Resour Res 28(3):675–683
Dillman DA (2000) Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY
Efron B, Tibshirani R (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York
Greene WH (2003) Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Hanemann WM (1984) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. Am J Agr Econ 66(3):332–341
Hanley N, Colombo S, Tinch D, Black A, Aftab A (2006a) Estimating the benefits of water quality improvements under the water framework directive: are benefits transferable? Eur Rev Agr Econ 33(3):391–413
Hanley N, Wright RE, Alvarez-Farizo B (2006b) Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive. J Environ Manage 78(2):183–193
Jiang Y, Swallow SK, McGonagle M (2005) Context-sensitive benefit transfer using stated choice models: specification and convergent validity for policy analysis. Environ Resour Econ 31(4):477–499
Johnston RJ, Swallow SK, Bauer DM (2002) Spatial factors and stated preference values for public goods: considerations for rural land development. Land Econ 78(4):481–500
Johnston RJ, Besedin EY, Iovanna R, Miller C, Wardwell R, Ranson M (2005) Systematic variation in willingness to pay for aquatic resource improvements and implications for benefit transfer: a meta-analysis. Can J Agr Econ 53(2–3):221–248
Johnston RJ, Swallow SK, Marie Bauer D, Anderson CM (2003a) Preferences for residential development attributes and support for the policy process: implications for management and conservation of rural landscapes. Agr Resour Econ Rev 32(1):65–82
Johnston RJ, Swallow SK, Tyrrell TJ, Bauer DM (2003b) Rural amenity values and length of residency. Am J Agr Econ 85(4):1009–1024
Johnston RJ, Weaver TF, Smith LA, Swallow SK (1995) Contingent valuation focus groups: insights from ethnographic interview techniques. Agr Resour Econ Rev 24(1):56–69
Kask SB, Shogren JF (1994) Benefit transfer protocol for long-term health risk valuation: a case of surface water contamination. Water Resourc Res 30(10):2813–2823
Kline J, Wichelns D (1998) Measuring heterogeneous preferences for preserving farmland and open space. Ecol Econ 26(2):211–224
Krinsky I, Robb AL (1986) On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Rev Econ Stat 68(4):715–719
Kristofersson D, Navrud S (2005) Validity tests of benefit transfer—are we performing the wrong tests? Environ Res Econ 30(3):279–286
Loomis JB (1992) The evolution of a more rigorous approach to benefit transfer: benefit function transfer. Water Resourc Res 28(3):701–705
Maddala GS (1983) Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
McConnell KE (1990) Models for referendum data: the structure of discrete choice models for contingent valuation. J Environ Econ Manage 19(1):19–34
Morrison M, Bennett J (2004) Valuing new south wales rivers for use in benefit transfer. The Aust J Agr Resour Econ 48(4):591–611
Morrison M, Bennett J, Blamey R, Louviere J (2002) Choice modeling and tests of benefit transfer. Am J Agr Econ 84(1):161–170
Morrison M, Bergland O (2006) Prospects for the use of choice modelling for benefit transfer. Ecol Econ 60(2):420–428
Muthke T, Holm-Mueller K (2004) National and international benefit transfer testing with a rigorous test procedure. Envir Resour Econ 29(3):323–336
Piper S, Martin WE (2001) Evaluating the accuracy of the benefit transfer method: a rural water supply application in the USA. J Environ Manage 63(3):223–235
Poe GL, Giraud KL, Loomis JB (2005) Computational methods for measuring the difference in empirical distributions. Am J Agr Econ 87(2):353–365
Rhode Island Geographic Information System (RIGIS) (2000) 1995 Land use by Rhode Island community. Providence, RI: Rhode Island geographic information system and the Rhode Island board of governors for higher education
Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation (2006) State and community profiles. http://www.riedc.com/riedc/ri_databank/31/. Providence, RI: Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation
Rosenberger RS, Loomis JB (2001) Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation use values: a technical document supporting the forest service strategic plan (2000 Revisions). General technical report RMRS-GTR-72. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of agriculture, forest service, rocky mountain research station. 59p. (www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_gtr72.html)
Rosenberger RS, Loomis JB (2003) Benefit transfer. In: Champ PA, Boyle KJ, Brown TC (eds) A Primer on non-market valuation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 445–482
Rosenberger RS, Stanley TD (2006) Measurement, generalization and publication: sources of error in benefit transfers and their management. Ecol Econ 60(2):372–378
Schuirmann DJ (1987) A comparison of the two one-sided procedure and the power approach for assessing equivalence of average bioavailability. J Pharmacokinet Biop 15(6):657–680
Shrestha RK, Loomis JB (2003) Meta-analytic benefit transfer of outdoor recreation economic values: testing out-of-sample convergent validity. Environ Resour Econ 25:79–100
Stegner BL, Bostrom AG, Greenfield TK (1996) Equivalence testing for use in psychosocial and services research: an introduction with examples. Eval Program Plann 19(3):193–198
Swait J, Louviere JJ (1993) The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models. J Market Res 30(3):305–314
Tiebout C (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. The J Polit Econ 64(5):416–424
Van Bueren M, Bennett J (2004) Towards the development of a transferable set of value estimates for environmental attributes. Aust J Agr Resour Econ 48(1):1–32
VandenBerg TP, Poe GL, Powell JR (2001) Assessing the accuracy of benefits transfers: evidence from a multi-site contingent valuation study of groundwater quality. In: Bergstrom JC, Boyle KJ, Poe GL (eds) The economic value of water quality. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnston, R.J. Choice experiments, site similarity and benefits transfer. Environ Resource Econ 38, 331–351 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9073-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9073-4