Abstract
The validity of environmental benefit transfer has been tested on numerous occasions assuming classical null hypothesis of equality. We argue against this assumption on the basis of theory, which clearly indicates that environmental benefits should be assumed to vary from context to context. We suggest the use of equivalence testing as a more appropriate and a clear compliment to the shortcomings of classical tests. Equivalence tests test the null hypothesis of difference between the original and transferred value estimates. Equivalence tests also combine the concepts of statistical significance and policy significance into one test, by defining an acceptable transfer error prior to the validity test. The results of a published study on validity of benefit transfer are reversed when subjected to an equivalence test.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
R.L. Berger J.C. Hsu (1996) ArticleTitleBioequivalence Trials, Intersection-union Tests and Equivalence Statistical Science 11 IssueID4 283–302
O. Bergland K. Magnussen S. Navrud (2002) Benefit transfer: Testing for Accuracy and Reliability R.J.G.M. Florax P. Nijkamp K. Willis (Eds) Comparative Environmental Economic Assessment Edward Elgar Publishing UK
R. Brouwer (2000) ArticleTitleEnvironmental Value Transfer: State of the Art and Future Prospects Ecological Economics 32 IssueID1 137–152
R. Brouwer A. Spaninks (1999) ArticleTitleThe Validity of Environmental Benefit Transfer: Further Empirical Testing Environmental and resource economics 14 95–117
W.H. Desvousges M.C. Naughton G.R. Parsons (1992) ArticleTitleBenefit transfer-Conceptual Problems in estimating Water-quality Benefits using Existing Studies Water resources research 28 IssueID3 675–683
M. Downing T. Ozuna (1996) ArticleTitleTesting the Reliability of the Benefit Transfer Approach Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30 316–322
W.W. Hauck S. Anderson (1984) ArticleTitleA New Statistical Procedure for Testing Equivalence in Two-group Comparative Bioavailability Trials Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 12 IssueID1 83–91
J.M. Hoenig D.M. Heisey (2001) ArticleTitleThe Abuse of Power: The Pervasive Fallacy of Power Calculations for Data Analysis American Statistician 55 IssueID1 19–24
P.O. Johansson (1987) he Economic Theory and Measurement of Environmental Benefits Cambridge University Press Cambridge
S. Kirchhoff B.G. Colby J.T. LaFrance (1997) ArticleTitleEvaluating the Performance of Benefit Transfer: An Empirical Inquiry Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33 IssueID1 75–93
J.B. Loomis (1992) ArticleTitleThe Evolution of a More Rigorous Approach to Benefit Transfer - Benefit Function Transfer Water resources research 28 IssueID3 701–705
J. Loomis B. Roach F. Ward R. Ready (1995) ArticleTitleTesting Transferability of Recreation Demand Models Across Regions - A Study of Corps of Engineer Reservoirs Water Resources Research 31 IssueID3 721–730
S. Navrud G.J. Pruckner (1997) ArticleTitleEnvironmental Valuation - To Use or not to Use? A Comparative Study of the United States and Europe Environmental and Resource Economics 10 1–26
D.J. Schuirmann (1987) ArticleTitleA Comparison of the Two One-sided Procedure and the Power Approach for Assessing Equivalence of Average Bioavailability Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 15 IssueID6 657–680
B.L. Stegner A.G. Bostrom T.K. Greenfield (1996) ArticleTitleEquivalence Testing for Use in Psychosocial and Services Research: An Introduction with Examples Evaluation and Program Planning 19 IssueID3 193–198
P.G. Welling F.L.S. Tse S.V. Dighe (1991) Pharmaceutical Bioequivalence Marcel Dekker New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
JEL classifications: Q26, C12
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kristofersson, D., Navrud, S. Validity Tests of Benefit Transfer – Are We Performing the Wrong Tests?. Environ Resource Econ 30, 279–286 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-004-2303-8
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-004-2303-8