Abstract
The mfERG, when first introduced by Erich Sutter used long sequences with short periods (∼15 ms) between steps (flashes). Since then a number of studies have introduced slower or modified sequences to emphasise Oscillatory Potentials (OPs), Optic Nerve Head Components (ONHC) or the s-wave. With this reduction in the rate of presentation many of the investigators have reduced the length of the sequence to allow a shorter recording period. This is also desirable for patient comfort and co-operation in diagnostic investigations.
When reducing the length of the sequence there is a risk that it will be too short to ensure orthogonality of the first order component and all significant higher order components, particularly when a large number of areas (hexagons) are stimulated. This paper aims to verify that a short sequence (using the sequence used by the Roland Retiscan® stimulating 19 hexagons) is capable of keeping responses of both first and higher orders separate for each stimulating area. The sequence was investigated by placing photodiodes connected to a Diagnosys Espion® and then exported to Excel® and MATLAB® for analysis.
It was determined that the sequences used were m-sequences length n = 9. The photodiode only responded to flashes of light so was unable to detect a correcting 0 at the end of sequence. The sequences driving each hexagon were then determined and found to be shifted 26 steps from each other. The correlation coefficients between all sequences was found to be −1/(2n−1). The sequences to decode the second order kernels were determined and the correlation coefficients between each of these sequences, and between these and the original sequences, were also −1/(2n−1). This work provides a mathematical validation of the use of short sequences for slow mfERG, and describes an empirical test method.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Sutter EE (1991) The fast m-Transform: a fast computation of cross-correlations with binary m-sequences. Soc Indust Appl Math J Comput 20(4):686–694
Sutter EE, Tran D (1992) The field topography of ERG components in man-I. The Photopic luminance response. Vision Res 32(3):433–446
Kondo M, Miyake Y, Horiguchi M, Suzuki S, Tanikawa A (1995) Clinical evalution of multifocal electroretinogram. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 36:2146–2150
Hood DC, Holopigian K, Seiple W, Greenstein VC, Li J, Sutter EE et al (1998) Assessment of local retinal function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa using the multifocal technique. Vision Res 38:163–179
Kretschmann U, Seeliger M, Ruether K, Usui T, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Zrenner E (1998) Multifocal electroretinography in patients with stargardt’s macular dystrophy. Br J Ophthalmol 38:267–275
Piao CH, Kondo M, Tanikawa A, Terasaki H, Miyake Y (2000) Multifocal electroretinogram in occult macular dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41: 513–517
Kretschmann U, Seeliger M, Ruether K, Usui T, Zrenner E (1998) Spatial cone activity distribution in diseases of the posterior pole determined by multifocal electroretinography. Vision Res 38:3817–3828
Hood DC, Seiple W, Holopigian K, greenstein VC (1997) A comparison of the components of the multifocal and full-field ERGs. Vis Neurosci 14:533–544
Wu S, Sutter EE (1995) A topographic study of oscillatory potentials in man. Vis Neurosci 12:1013–1025
Schuster A, Pusch CM, Gamer D, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Zrenner E, Kurtenbach A (2005) Multifocal oscillatory potentials in CSNB1 and CSNB2 type congenital night blindness. Int J Mol Med 15:159–167
Onozu H, Yamamoto S (2003) Oscillatory potentials of multifocal electroretinogram in diabetic retinopathy. Doc Ophthalmol 106:327–332
Sutter EE, Bearse MA (1999) The optic nerve head component of the human ERG. Vision Res 39:419–436
Sutter EE, Shimada Y, Li J, Bearse MA (1999) Mapping inner retinal function through enhancement of adaptive components in the M-ERG. Vision Science and Its Applications 1:52–55. Washington, DC, Optical Society of America, OSA technical Digest Series. Ref Type: Serial (Book, Monograph)
Sutter EE, Bearse MA, Shimada Y (1999) A multifocal ERG protocol for testing retinal ganglion cell function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:S15. Ref Type: Abstract
Shimada Y, Li J, Bearse MA, Sutter EE, Fung W (2001) Assessment of early retinal changes in diabetes using a new multifocal ERG protocol. Br J Ophthalmol 85:414–419
Fortune B, Bearse MA, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA (2002) Selective loss of an oscillatory component from temporal retinal multifocal ERG responses in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43(8):2638–2647
Sano M, Tazawa Y, Nabeshima T, Mita M (2002) A␣new wavelet in the multifocal electroretinogram, probably originating from ganglion cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43(5):1666–1672
Hood DC, Frishman LJ, Saszik S, Viswanathan S (2002) Retinal origins of the primate multifocal ERG: implications for the human response. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43(5):1673–1685
Hare WA, Ton H (2002) Effects of APB, PDA and TTX on the ERG responses recorded using both multifocal and conventional methods in monkeys. Doc Ophthalmol 105:189–222
Rangaswamy NV, Hood DC, Frishman LJ (2003) Regional variations in local contributions to the primate photopic flash ERG: revealed using the slow-sequence mfERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44(7):3233–3247
Sutter EE (2000) The interpretation of multifocal binary kernels. Doc Ophthalmol 100(1):49–75, Ref Type: Abstract
Saeki M, Gouras P (1996) Cone ERGs to flash trains: the antagonism of a later flash. Vision Res 36(19):3229–3235
Ireland JM, Keating D, Hoggar SG, Parks S (2002) Identification of appropriate primitive polynomials to avoid cross-contamination in multifocal electroretinogram responses. Med Biol Eng Comput 40(4):471–478
James AC (2003) The pattern-pulse multifocal visual evoked potential. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:879–890
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Peter Watt for his technical assistance with the photodiode. The authors would also like to thank the editor and reviewers for their constructive comments on this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hagan, R.P., Fisher, A.C. & Brown, M.C. Examination of short binary sequences for mfERG recording. Doc Ophthalmol 113, 21–27 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-006-9009-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-006-9009-x