Abstract
Open Source Software (OSS) development challenges traditional software engineering practices. In particular, OSS projects are managed by a large number of volunteers, working freely on the tasks they choose to undertake. OSS projects also rarely rely on explicit system-level design, or on project plans or schedules. Moreover, OSS developers work in arbitrary locations and collaborate almost exclusively over the Internet, using simple tools such as email and software code tracking databases (e.g. CVS).
All the characteristics above make OSS development akin to weaving a tapestry of heterogeneous components. The OSS design process relies on various types of actors: people with prescribed roles, but also elements coming from a variety of information spaces (such as email and software code). The objective of our research is to understand the specific hybrid weaving accomplished by the actors of this distributed, collective design process. This, in turn, challenges traditional methodologies used to understand distributed software engineering: OSS development is simply too “fibrous” to lend itself well to analysis under a single methodological lens.
In this paper, we describe the methodological framework we articulated to analyze collaborative design in the Open Source world. Our framework focuses on the links between the heterogeneous components of a project’s hybrid network. We combine ethnography, text mining, and socio-technical network analysis and visualization to understand OSS development in its totality. This way, we are able to simultaneously consider the social, technical, and cognitive aspects of OSS development. We describe our methodology in detail, and discuss its implications for future research on distributed collective practices.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barcellini F., Détienne F., Burkhardt J.-M., Sack W. (2005). A Study of On-line Discussions in Open-Source Software Community: Reconstructing Thematic Coherence and Argumentation from Citation Practices. In: van den Besselaar P., de Michelis G., Preece J. and Simone C. (eds), Communities and Technologies 2005. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Springer, pp. 301–320
Bowman, I.T., C. Richard and R.C. Holt (1998): Software Architecture Recovery using Conway’s law. In Proceedings of the 1998 Conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research
Bourret, P., A. Mogoutov, C. Julian-Reynier and A. Cambrosio (forthcoming): A New Clinical Collective for French Cancer Genetics: A Heterogeneous Mapping Analysis, Science, Technology, and Human Values
Callon M. (1986): Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (ed), Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London, Routledge and Keegan Paul, pp. 196–229
Coleman E.G. (2001). High-tech guilds in the era of global capital. The journal for the anthropology of work 22(1): 28–32
D’Astous P., Détienne F., Robillard P.N., Visser W. (2004). Changing Our View on Design Evaluation Meetings Methodology: A Study of Software Technical Evaluation Meetings. Design studies 25: 625–655
Détienne, F., J.-F. Boujut, and B. Hohmann (2004): Characterization of Collaborative Design and Interaction Management Activities in a Distant Engineering Design Situation. COOP 2004
Détienne F., Martin G., Lavigne E. (2005). Viewpoints in Co-design: A Field Study in Concurrent Engineering. Design Studies 26(3): 215–241
Divitini, M., L. Jaccheri, E. Monteiro and H. Traetteberg (2003): Open Source Process: No Place for Politics? In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering, Portland, OR, pp. 39–44
Ducheneaut, N. (2003): The Reproduction of Open Source Software Communities. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of California, Berkeley, CA
Ducheneaut N. (2005). Socialization in an Open Source Software Community: A Socio-technical Analysis. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 4(4): 323–368
Eklundh, K. and H. Rodriguez (2004): Coherence and Interactivity in Text-based Group Discussions around Web Documents. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences
Fogel, K. (1999): Open Source Development with CVS: Learn How to Work with Open Source Software. The Coriolis Group
Gacek C., Arief B. (2004). The Many Meanings of Open Source. IEEE Software 21(1): 34–40
Gasser, L., W. Scacchi, G. Ripoche and B. Penne, (2003): Understanding Continuous Design in F/OSS Projects. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Software Engineering and Its Applications (ICSSEA-03). Paris, France
Ghosh, R. and V.V. Prakash (2000): The Orbiten Free Software Survey. First Monday, vol. 5, no. 7
Gonzalez-Barahona, J.M., L. Lopez and G. Robles (2004): Community Structure of Modules in the Apache Project. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering. Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 44–48
Halliday M.A.K. and Hasan R. (1976). Cohesion in English. New York, Longman
Herbsleb, J.D., H. Klein, G.M. Olson, H. Brunner, J.S. Olson, and J. Harding (1995): Object-oriented Analysis and Design in Software Project Teams. In F. Détienne and R. Rist (eds.): Special Issue on Empirical Studies of Object-oriented Design. Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 10, nos. 2 and 3, pp. 249–292
Herbsleb, J. and R.E. Grinter (1999): Architectures, Coordination, and Distance: Conway’s Law and Beyond. IEEE Software, September/October 1999, pp. 63–70
Herring, S. (1999): Interactional Coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 4, no. 4
Krishnamurthy, S. (2002): Cave or Community? An Empirical Examination of 100 Mature open Source Projects. First Monday, vol. 7, no. 6
Latour B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Lave J., Wenger E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York, NY, Cambridge University
Madey, G., V. Freeh and R. Tynan (2004): Modeling the F/OSS community: A Quantitative Investigation. In S. Koch (ed.): Free/Open Source Software Development. Idea Publishing
Mahendran, D. (2002): Serpents and Primitives: An Ethnographic Excursion into an Open Source Community. Unpublished Masters thesis. University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Mockus A., Fielding R.T., Herbsleb J. (2002). Two Cases Studies of Open Source Software Development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 11(3): 309–346
Nonnecke, B. and J. Preece (2003): Silent Participants: Getting to Know Lurkers Better. In D.␣Fisher and C. Lueg (eds.): From Usenet to Cowebs: Interacting with Social Information Spaces. Springer Verlag
Olson G.M. and J.S. Olson (2000). Distance Matters. Human–Computer Interaction 15: 139–178
Olson G.M., Olson J.S., Carter M.R. and Storrosten M. (1992). Small Group Design Meetings: An Analysis of Collaboration. Human–Computer Interaction 7: 347–374
Osterlie, T. (2004). In the Network: Distributed Control in Gentoo Linux. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 76–81
Popolov, D., M. Callaghan and P. Luker (2000): Conversation Space: Visualizing Multi-threaded Conversation. In Proceedings of avi 2000, Palermo, Italy
Raymond, E.S. and B. Young (2001): The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. O’Reilly & Associates
Reid E. (1999). Hierarchy and Power: Social Control in Cyberspace. In M.A. Smith and P. Kollock (eds): Communities in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge
Ripoche, G. and J.-P. Sansonnet (this issue): Experiences in Automating the Analysis of Linguistic Interactions for the Study of Distributed Collectives. In Journal of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work
Robles-Martinez, G., J.M. Gonzalez-Barahona, J. Centeno-Gonzalez, V. Matellan-Oliveira and L. Rodero-Merino (2003): Studying the Evolution of Libre Software Projects Using Publicly Available Data. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering, Portland, OR, pp. 111–116
Sack W.(2001). Conversation Map: An Interface for Very Large-Scale Conversations. Journal of Management Information Systems, Winter 17(3): 73–92
Sack, W., N. Ducheneaut, D. Mahendran, F. Detienne and J.-M. Burkhardt (2003): Social Architecture and Technological Determinism in Open Source Software Development. Paper presented at the International 4S Conference: Social Studies of Science and Society, Atlanta, GA
Sandusky, R.J. and L. Gasser (2005): Negotiation and the Coordination of Information and Activity in Distributed Software Problem Management. In K. Schmidt, M. Pendergast, M.␣Ackerman, and G. Mark (eds.): Proceedings of the 2005 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. New York, USA: ACM Press, pp. 187–196
Scacchi, W. (2004): Socio-technical Interaction Networks in Free/Open Source Software Development Processes. In S.T. Acuna and N. Juristo (eds.): Peopleware and the Software Process. World Scientific Press
Star, S.L. (1995): Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology. State University of New York Press
Stempfle J. and P. Badke-Schaub (2002): Thinking in Design Teams – An Analysis of Team Communication. Design Studies 23: 473–496
Teil, G. and B. Latour (1995): The Hume Machine: Can Association Networks Do More than Formal rules? Stanford Humanities Review, vol. 4, no. 2
Tuomi, I. (2001): Internet, Innovation, and Open Source: Actors in the Network. First Monday, vol. 6, no. 1
Turner V. (1969). The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-structure. Chicago, Aldine Publishing Co.
Venolia, G. and C. Neustaedter (2003): Understanding Sequence and Reply Relationships within Email Conversations: A Mixed-model Visualization. In Proceedings of Chi2003. Fort Lauderdale, FL: ACM
von Krogh G., Spaeth S., Lakhani K. (2003). Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study. Research Policy 32(7): 1217–1241
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The order of the co-authors names is not significant.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sack, W., Détienne, F., Ducheneaut, N. et al. A Methodological Framework for Socio-Cognitive Analyses of Collaborative Design of Open Source Software. Comput Supported Coop Work 15, 229–250 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-006-9020-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-006-9020-5