Abstract
Malignant tumours have the remarkable property to express cell surface antigens. Pressman was first reporting that radiolabeled antibodies were capable of organ localization. It was a promising challenge but the expected success and the development of this imaging method was limited by a poor imaging resolution despite a rather good specificity of the antibodies used. Identification of key cell surface markers is opening a new era as potential molecular imaging biomarkers in oncologic applications. Antibodies production has been promoted by the development of engineered fragments with preserved immunological properties and pharmacokinetics optimized for molecular imaging. A good compromise has to be obtained between the biological properties of the antibody and the physical half-life of the radionuclide. Several positron emission tomography (PET) radionuclides such as iodine-124, copper-64, yttrium-86 or zirconium-89 have been the focus of recent immuno-PET studies with interesting informative images in preclinical and clinical studies. Thanks to the development of more sensitive new detectors and specific software, molecular imaging methods, particularly PET imaging, allow nowadays the detection of lesions smaller than 5 mm in human. Immuno-PET can potentially be used for tumour detection and identification at diagnosis, staging and restaging, for treatment selection and monitoring, and during follow-up. Moreover the availability of matched imaging or therapeutic radionuclide pairs, such as 124I/131I, 64Cu/67Cu and 86Y/90Y, make easier the quantification of tissue uptake and dosimetry calculation for radioimmunotherapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Since one century, a dramatic technological and scientific revolution has occurred in the field of cancer diagnosis. The concept of targeted diagnosis is closely associated to the concept of targeted therapy. This concept of targeted strategy was the dogma of Paul Ehrlich [1] and the magic bullet quest remains a living paradigm for modern cancer research. For over 70 years, many generations of medical oncologists have tried cancer immunotherapy to diagnose or fight cancer and the immune system stimulation was always very disappointing [2]. In 1978, functional imaging has given great hopes when for the first time David Goldenberg published promising results using radiolabeled antibodies to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for the detection of diverse cancers by scintigraphy. Murine polyclonal antibodies against CEA or tumor-associated glycoprotein-72 (TAG-72) were produced, radiolabeled and used for imaging diagnosis [3, 4]. As the detection was achieved with poor resolution cameras, immunoimaging in cancer detection was limited to tumors up to 15 mm (Fig. 1). The exceptional advances in chemistry, immunology and genetic research as well in functional imaging have actually sped up cancer tracer research leading to molecular fusion imaging, the natural evolution of functional imaging.
Radiolabeled antibodies for molecular imaging
The very first-generation of antibodies used as imaging agents was derived from immunogenic mouse polyclonal antibodies. Rapidly, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were a substitute for polyclonal antibodies as well chimeric or humanized antibodies have become a substitute for murine antibodies, strongly immunogenic [5]. Human antibodies were obtained from a patient with a colonic cancer and participating in a trial of active specific immunotherapy. Fortunately, humanization of murine antibodies has become routine and totally human antibodies can be produced by immunization of mice genetically engineered to carry germ line human immunoglobulin genes. Recent progress in biology and genetics have provided extensive information on tumor cell particularly on surface receptors, ligands, adhesion molecules, proteases and proteins responsible for differentiation and activation, all information which represent potential targets for molecular imaging with antibodies [6]. However, as antibodies are directed against cell surface targets, their use for immunoimaging is restricted to the assessment of cell surface markers. Nevertheless the clinical efficacy of mAbs such as trastuzumab (anti-Her2/neu) or rituximab (anti-CD20) is a proof for the ability of cell surface target antibodies to block critical biologic targets or signaling pathways in patients. They can be potentially used as immunoimaging agents.
Radio labeled intact antibodies images have to be taken 2 or 3 days after the infusion to enhance the contrast between the tumoral uptake and the circulating activity (tumor to background ration) and require radionuclide with half-life (from several hours to days). In order to have a faster blood clearance and to enhance image quality, Fab, Fab′ or F(ab′)2 fragments obtained by enzymatic digestion of antibodies was suggested. These fragments radiolabeled with radionuclides like technetium-99m were more suitable for scintigraphy (Fig. 2).
Research and development of antibodies for molecular imaging have led to impressive progress. The removal of the Fc region was really determinant resulting in an accelerated blood clearance and a smaller size (molecular weight under 60 kDa). Single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) became the basis for engineered antibody fragments that retain full binding specificity. Dimers, trimers and multimers of scFv (diabodies, triabodies, and tetrabodies and tandem diabodies) were built [7, 8]. Minibodies resulting from the fusion of scFvs to additional antibody domains such as the closely related small immunoproteins and the larger scFv–Fc fusion proteins were also engineered [9]. All these engineered antibodies typically retain the high affinity and specificity of the parental antibody and their faster blood clearance is directly format-dependent. Diabodies and bivalent minibodies exhibit terminal half-lives in the range of 3–8 h with tumoral uptake levels ranging from 7 to 20 % of the injected dose per gram of tumor in murine models. These properties allow high-contrast single photon emission tomography (SPET) or positron emission tomography (PET) images within a few hours after tracer injection [10]. Recently a high affinity, monovalent Her2-specific affibodies had demonstrated an impressive tumoral targeting in preclinical models [8]. As compared to the results obtained with radiolabeled intact antibodies and Fab or F(ab′)2 fragments, immunoimaging is moving in a new era where display technologies (phage, yeast or ribosome) will be used for identifying human antibodies according to the desired binding properties and small proteins engineering based on fibronectin domains, or protein A domains (Affibodies; Affibody AB) will provide binding molecules for molecular targeting [9, 11].
Radionuclides for immunoimaging
Since the beginning of radioimmunoimaging, iodine-131, indium-111, iodine-123 and technetium-99m were mainly used for scintigraphy (planar and/or SPET imaging). Several years ago, we have carried out a prospective trial on 31 consecutive patients presenting with a breast cancer [12]. A breast radioimmunolymphoscintigraphy (RILS) using a human mAb (LiLo-16.88 labeled with indium-111) reacting with a cytoplasmic antigen (CTAA 16.88) was performed prior to surgery (Fig. 3). Planar and SPET images were successively obtained at 4, 24 and 48 h after a peri-areolar subcutaneous injection. 370 lymph nodes were assessed by ex vivo scintigraphy and correlated to pathology and immunohistochemistry. The positive predictive value for CTAA 16.88 positive nodes including both metastatic and hyperplastic nodes was 90 % in stages 0–IIB. Four positive nodes with follicular hyperplasia contained micrometastases. The negative predictive value was 93 %. These results were suggesting that RILS may be clinically useful and selectively limit the extent of the surgical procedure to positive lymph nodes. This study was achieved using a gamma camera with a limited resolution and failed to detect small abnormal lymph nodes under a 15 mm diameter. With the new generation of hybrid systems including SPET and PET/CT (computed tomography) or MRI gathering molecular and anatomical imaging and resulting in a dramatic enhancement in image quality, it should be of interest to compare the results obtained with non specific tracers like colloids to specific radiolabeled antibodies in the sentinel node detection. The advantage of hybrid gamma camera was demonstrated in a pilot study in refractory Hodgkin disease using a rabbit mAb against ferritin labeled with indium-111 for imaging and yttrium-90 for therapy [13]. Images were more precise and a relative quantification of the mAb uptake was possible. Today PET/CT scanners using 2-deoxy-2[18F]-fluoro-d-deoxyglucose (18FDG) are widely used in nuclear medicine departments and time for the development of novel molecular PET tracers has come. Among positron-emitting radionuclides several of them are of interest: copper-64 (64Cu-12.7h), yttrium-86 (86Y-14.7h), bromine-76 (76Br-16.0h) for engineered antibodies, zirconium-89 (89Zr-78.4h) and iodine-124 (124I-100.2h) for intact antibodies. A next step for molecular imaging is to evaluate target expression and avidity before an antibody therapy. This is becoming possible with quantitative immuno-PET and the availability of radionuclide pairs, such as 124I/131I, 64Cu/67Cu and 86Y/90Y which can be used either for imaging or therapy purposes. A significant impact upon the patients management of 18FDG-PET imaging-based strategies is now demonstrated [14, 15]. Therefore, the development and selection of the antibodies with highest affinity and specificity is critical to its efficacy in oncology may be based on immuno-PET imaging [16]. A large number of preclinical and clinical studies are in progress. A good example is the work achieved by the group of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Since the late 1980s, they have developed a specific antibody G250 which recognizes the tumor-associated protein carbonic anhydrase IX expressed in clear cell renal cancer. This antibody was labeled with iodine-131 and used for radioimmunodetection and radioimmunotherapy [17]. No reliable quantification was possible. Recently, the same group has developed a chimeric antibody cG250, which can be labeled with iodine-124 [18]. PET/CT was used to detect and quantify 26 renal masses before surgery. Immunochemistry, autoradiography and gamma-counting of tumor tissue were performed on surgical specimens. All patients with a clear cell renal cancer were positive. A significant correlation between tumor uptake estimated by in vivo and in vitro methods (p = 0.000001) demonstrated that PET quantitative parameters provide quantitative pharmacokinetic data [19].
Progress in image quality
The lack of sensitivity of planar and SPET detectors were giving images with poor resolution and attenuation correction was suggested to enhance image quality. In the 1990s, attenuation correction was performed with radionuclide-based transmission systems using germanium-68 or cesium-137 (total or segmentary). Since the development of hybrid system, attenuation map are now calculated from the CT avoiding unnecessary dose delivering and result in a sharpest contrast with a higher spatial resolution. Iterative reconstruction algorithms using the ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) technique has replaced the filtered back projection (FBP) previously used. The comparison between the FBP using a Butterworth filter (5; 0.3), iteration without (IRNC) and with attenuation correction (IRAC) was performed on 25 patients [20]. Three different set of images were obtained for each reconstruction software. FBP was too noisy generating a lot of false positive results. IRAC allowed to obtain the best image quality demonstrating some small abnormal foci not detected by the FBP method. This is confirming the benefits of using CT images for attenuation correction of SPET or PET data. Due to the significant improvement in image quality, OSEM has replaced all other analytic methods. Advancements in computing power and algorithm design have resulted in new and more accurate models being utilized for reconstruction algorithms. This includes improvements in components of the system model based on the detector geometry [21], fully 3D scatter estimates [22], and low noise random estimates [23]. A new algorithm, the SharpIR® algorithm (GE Healthcare), has been developed to improve the vue point high definition algorithm (3D OSEM IR). The PET detector response which is depending on sampling width, detector geometry and co linearity effects was included as a function of position in the scanner. By incorporating this information into the PET iterative reconstruction software, the contrast was significantly enhanced and a significant reduction in noise was obtained [24]. Images obtained in patients with the SharpIR® algorithm are significantly better and more precise (Fig. 4).
Conclusion
Since 1928, when the Aschheim–Zondek test [25] was developed for either the diagnosis of pregnancy or cancer of the testis, progresses in biology (immunoassays, genetic and biopathology) have been impressive. A large number of new biomarkers have been identified and they are widely used to characterize tumors. It is well known that tumor markers can be detected in the blood a long time before lesion detection however very few of them are used for therapeutic decision or as an evaluable target to assess the therapeutic efficacy. On the same way, the spatial resolution and sensitivity of molecular imaging has also progressed with new detectors and new software. In spite of a better spatial resolution, anatomical imaging modalities fails to disclose small tumour lesions that have not yet caused morphologic alterations or to characterize them. Molecular imaging using radionuclides is challenging to detect lesions earlier before their anatomical visualization, and particularly with hybrid systems that provide clinically relevant information on a synergic way. The association of molecular biology and hybrid imaging is opening a new era as potential molecular imaging biomarkers in oncologic applications. Fused images are determinant in one out of four patients (24.6 %) particularly to dissociate physiological from pathological activities. In clinical oncology fused images are commonly used and may induce change in therapeutic choice in approximately 50 %. Moreover an occult metastatic disease suspected on the basis of a significant elevation of a tumour marker is demonstrated in 87.1 % of all cases and can be treated earlier. The association of biomarkers and molecular imaging is our next future. Targeted therapies with mAbs are widely used in oncology with efficacy for a small percentage of patients. The development of engineered antibody-based imaging agents is a stimulating challenge to verify targeting, to establish pharmacokinetics and to predict their clinical performance. Looking behind, the significant results obtained using engineered fragments labeled with radionuclides for SPET imaging are a relevant basis for the development of immuno-PET. With a wide range of positron-emitting radionuclides and a large number of engineered antibodies the use of immuno-PET with labeled cell surface biomarkers is quickly growing in preclinical and clinical studies [26]. In oncological applications, immuno-PET can play an important role at diagnosis, staging, for treatment selection, monitoring and during follow-up.
References
Ehrlich P (1900) Croonian lecture: on immunity with special reference to cell life. Proc R Soc Lond 66:424–448
Boswell CA, Brechbiel MW (2007) Development of radioimmunotherapeutic and diagnostic antibodies: an inside-out view. Nucl Med Biol 34:757–778
Goldenberg DM, DeLand F, Kim E, Bennett S, Primus FJ, van Nagell JR Jr, Estes N, DeSimone P, Rayburn P (1978) Use of radiolabeled antibodies to carcinoembryonic antigen for the detection and localization of diverse cancers by external photoscanning. N Engl J Med 298(25):1384–1386
Johnson VG, Schlom J, Paterson AJ, Bennett J, Magnani JL, Colcher D (1986) Analysis of a human tumor-associated glycoprotein (TAG-72) identified by monoclonal antibody B72.3. Cancer Res 46:850–857
DeJager R, Abdel Nabi H, Serafini A, Pecking AP, Klein JL, Hanna MG Jr (1993) Current status of cancer immunodetection with radiolabeled human monoclonal antibodies. Semin Nucl Med XXIII 2:165–179
Wu AM, Olafsen T (2008) Antibodies for molecular imaging of cancer. Cancer J 14:191–197
Nuttall SD, Walsh RB (2008) Display scaffolds: protein engineering for novel therapeutics. Curr Opin Pharmacol 8(5):609–615
Orlova A, Magnusson M, Eriksson TL et al (2006) Tumor imaging using a picomolar affinity HER2 binding affibody molecule. Cancer Res 66:4339–4348
Holliger P, Hudson PJ (2005) Engineered antibody fragments and the rise of single domains. Nat Biotechnol 23:1126–1136
Sundaresan G, Yazaki PJ, Shively JE et al (2003) 124I-labeled engineered anti-CEA minibodies and diabodies allow high-contrast, antigen-specific small-animal PET imaging of xenografts in athymic mice. J Nucl Med 44:1962–1969
Santimaria M, Moscatelli G, Viale GL et al (2003) Immunoscintigraphic detection of the ED-B domain of fibronectin, a marker of angiogenesis, in patients with cancer. Clin Cancer Res 9:571–579
Pecking AP, Gougeon-Bertrand FJ, Lokiec FM et al (1996) Radioimmunolymphoscintigraphy in the preoperative staging of primary breast cancer: a pilot study using a human monoclonal antibody (LiLo 16.88). Int J Oncol 9:659–667
Decaudin D, Levy R, Lokiec F, Morschhauser F, Djeridane M, Kadouche J, Pecking A (2007) Radioimmunotherapy of refractory or relapsed Hodgkin’s lymphoma with 90Y-labelled antiferritin antibody. Anticancer Drugs 18:725–731
Pauwels EK, Ribeiro MJ, Stoot JH, McCready VR, Bourguignon M, Mazière B (1998) FDG accumulation and tumor biology. Nucl Med Biol 25:317–322
Hoh CK, Schiepers C, Seltzer MA, Gambhir SS, Silverman DH, Czernin J, Maddahi J, Phelps ME (1997) PET in oncology: Will it replace the other modalities? Semin Nucl Med 27:94–106
Larson SM, Schoder H (2009) New PET tracers for evaluation of solid tumor response to therapy. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 53:158–166
Divgi CR, Bander NH, Scott AM et al (1998) Phase I/II radioimmunotherapy trial with iodine-131-labeled monoclonal antibody G250 in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 4:2729–2739
Divgi CR, Pandit-Taskar N, Jungbluth AA et al (2007) Preoperative characterisation of clear-cell renal carcinoma using iodine-124-labelled antibody chimeric G250 (124I-cG250) and PET in patients with renal masses: a phase I trial. Lancet Oncol 8:304–310
Pryma DA, O’Donoghue JA, Humm JL, Jungbluth AA, Old LJ, Larson SM, Divgi CR (2011) Correlation of in vivo and in vitro measures of carbonic anhydrase IX antigen expression in renal masses using antibody 124I-cG250. J Nucl Med 52:535–540
Alberini JL, Edeline V, Giraudet AL, Champion L, Paulmier B, Madar O, Poinsignon A, Bellet D, Pecking AP (2011) Single photon emission tomography/computed tomography (SPET/CT) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to image cancer. J Surg Oncol 103:602–606
Manjeshwar R, Ross S, Iatrou M, Deller T, Stearns C (2006) Fully 3D PET iterative reconstruction using distance-driven projectors and native scanner geometry. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec 5:2804–2807
Iatrou M, Manjeshwar R, Ross S, Thielemans K, Stearns C (2006) 3D implementation of scatter estimation in 3D PET. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec 5:2142–2145
Stearns CW, McDaniel DL, Kohlmyer SG, Arul PR, Geiser BP, Shanmugam V (2003) Random coincidence estimation from single event rates on the Discovery ST PET/CT scanner. In: Conference record of the 2003 IEEE nuclear science symposium and medical imaging conference, Portland
Alessio A, Stearns CW, Tong S, Ross SG, Kohlmyer S, Ganin A, Kinahan PE (2010) Application and evaluation of a measured spatially variant system model for PET image reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29(3):938–949
Aschheim S, Zondek B (1928) Das Hormon des Hypophysenvorderlappens. II. Klinische Wochenschrift, Berlin 7:831–835
Van Dongen GA, Vosjan MJ (2010) Immuno-positron emission tomography: shedding light on clinical antibody therapy. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 25(4):375–385
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pecking, A.P., Bellet, D. & Alberini, J.L. Immuno-SPET/CT and immuno-PET/CT: a step ahead to translational imaging. Clin Exp Metastasis 29, 847–852 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-012-9501-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-012-9501-5