Abstract
Relative motion of objects moving in a close satellite formation is studied. The relative motion is expressed in the satellite reference frame R Λ B defined by orthogonal unit vectors in the radial, transverse and normal directions. Differential perturbations in orbital elements, satellite positions as well as in the radial, transverse and normal components of the radius vector are defined. Differential perturbations due to geopotential coefficients and luni-solar attraction are analysed for some exemplary satellites orbits. Results of a numerical analysis of motion have shown that the geopotential coefficients up to high degree and order as well as lunisolar effects have to be included into the applied force model to save the meter or centimeter level of accuracy in the description of the relative satellite motion.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alfriend, K. T., Schaub, H. and Gim, D. W.: 2000, ‘Gravitational perturbations, non-linearity and circular orbit assumption effects on formation flying control strategies’ Paper No., AAS 00-012, also Advances in the Astronautical Sciences 104, 139–158
S. Casotto (1993) ArticleTitle‘The Mapping of Kaula’s solution into the orbital reference frame’ Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 55 223–241 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00692511
M. K. Cheng (2002) ArticleTitle‘Gravitational perturbation theory for intersatellite tracking’ Journal of Geodesy 76 169–185 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00190-001-0233-6
D.-W. Gim K. T. Alfriend (2001) ArticleTitle‘The state transition matrix of relative motion for the perturbed non-circular reference orbit’ AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics conference also. Adv. Astronaut. Sci. 108 913–934
Gim, D.-W. and Alfriend, K. T.: 2005, ‘Satellite relative motion using differential equinoctial elements’, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy (in print).
J. G. Neelson P. J. Cefola R. J. Prolux (1998) ArticleTitle‘Current development of the Draper Semianalytical Satellite Theory standalone orbit propagator package’ Advances in the Astronautical Sciences 97 2037–2051
Sabol, C., Burns, R. and McLaughlin, C. A.: 2001,‘Satellite formation flying design and evolution’, AIAA JSR 38(2).
L. G. Taff (1985) ‘Celestial mechanics a Computional Guide for the Practitioner Wiley In., publication New York
E. Wnuk (1995) ‘Second order perturbations due to the gravity potential of a Planet’ A. E. Roy B. A. Steves (Eds) From Newton to Chaos Plenum Press New York 259–267
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wnuk, E., Golebiewska, J. The Relative Motion of Earth Orbiting Satellites. Celestial Mech Dyn Astr 91, 373–389 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-004-4265-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-004-4265-0