Introduction

Annually, more than 10,000 children less than 15 years old are diagnosed with malignancies in the US [1], with an estimated prevalence of more than 420,000 persons with a prior pediatric cancer [2, 3]. Among survivors, occurrence of cardiopulmonary diseases [4,5,6], subsequent cancers [7], and mortality [8] is increased, in part due to adverse treatment effects. Less is known about other less-studied outcomes, or for children with less common cancers, or within population-subgroups who typically are under-represented in cohort studies requiring repeated interactions or clinical visits for recruitment and follow-up [9, 10]. Characterization of serious morbidities within population-based studies will help in development of strategies for optimal care and follow-up for all children, including those who may be under-represented in many studies. We used linked population-based health registry data to compare late (5+ years after diagnosis) occurrence of hospitalization or death among childhood cancer cases in Washington State to that among children without cancer born in the same years, evaluating outcomes by cancer types and selected personal and family characteristics.

Methods

Institutional Review Board approvals including waivers of consent (due to use of existing health registry data) were received. We used population-based cancer registry data starting in 1974 from the Cancer Surveillance System of Western Washington (National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program; > 70% of state population), and starting in 1995 from the Washington State Cancer Registry (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Program of Central Cancer Registries; statewide surveillance), both subject to comprehensive quality control activities for completeness and accuracy [11, 12], meeting the highest standards of the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, which are the most comprehensive of any disease surveillance system [13]. Records of all persons < 20 years with cancer diagnosed 1974–2014 identified in the registries were linked to birth records 1974–2014 to identify children and adolescents born in-state (n = 5,876).

Cases surviving 5+ years after diagnosis (n = 5,000) were identified per registry follow-up. An “index date” was assigned (5 years after diagnosis). To account for earliest and latest years of complete follow-up data available (1987–2013) and the cases’ survival eligibility requirement, analysis included diagnosis years 1982–2008 (n = 3,589). Excluding non-malignancies (n = 437) left 3,152 cases. For each case, 10 comparison subjects were selected from birth records, matched on birth year and sex, excluding those known to have died before their case’s index date.

Hospitalizations and deaths were assessed by linking to state hospital discharge and death records. Washington State hospital discharge data include all inpatient and observation discharges in non-Federal facilities, with multiple International Classification of Disease, Version 9 codes (ICD9) for each episode using Medicare–Medicaid billing standards. The State Department of Health conducts steps to ensure complete hospital reporting, including tracking and verifying the number of records monthly, and following up with any delinquent reports. Deaths were identified in the death registry, which maintains agreements with the National Center for Health Statistics and the State Department to identify out-of-state deaths to residents; these include primary/contributing causes of death (ICD9, ICD10) information.

Outcomes assessed included any hospitalization, death, and occurrence of a hospitalization and/or death related to general outcome categories identified by relevant diagnosis codes in discharge/death records (Supplementary Table S1). Pregnancy-related hospitalizations (ICD9 630–679, 760–779) were excluded. We also evaluated selected outcome subsets: diabetes (ICD9 = 250; ICD10 = E109, E139, E141, E149) and fracture (ICD9 = 800–829, 733.1, 733.8, 733.93, 733.98; ICD10 = M48.4, M80, M84.0, M84.1, M84.2, M84.3, M84.4, M90.7, M96.6, S02, S12, S22, S32, S42, S52, S62, S72, S82, S92, T02, T08, T10, T12, T14.2). Because cancer-related hospitalizations at < 20 years of age would only have occurred among cases, analysis of this outcome was restricted to cases who survived to age 20 years without a cancer hospitalization (excluding the 5 years after diagnosis) and their comparison subjects, with left-truncation of follow-up at age 20 years.

Cancer registry data included: International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O) morphology and topography codes, histology, diagnosis age, date, initial therapy (chemotherapy, radiotherapy), and vital status at quarterly follow-up. Cancer types were classified per the International Classification of Childhood Cancer, 3rd edition [14]. Birth data included maternal age, race/ethnicity, insurance, rurality (as defined using U.S. Census Bureau standards) [15], and infant gender.

Case follow-up accrued from the index date, with similar dates for comparison subjects, through December 2013, or death date if earlier. We estimated the incidence rate of outcomes per 1,000 person-years. Birth year- and sex-adjusted rate differences/1,000 person-years and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for outcomes were estimated with Poisson regression. Proportional hazards were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) estimates and 95% CIs for the hypothesis that survivors have increased hospitalization/death rates vs. comparison children. All-cause mortality HRs were calculated using death certificate data. Risk-set stratification accounted for matched set number; confounder evaluation was conducted by their inclusion in regressions. Race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, Native American/Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, Other); sex; urban/rural residence at birth; diagnosis year; maternal education (< 13, 13+ years) and medical insurance at delivery (Medicaid, Private/other) as a proxy of socio-economic status were considered for their potential effects; only those altering risk estimates by > 10% were adjusted for. HRs accounted for matching variables (sex, birth year), unless otherwise indicated. Sub-analyses examined rates and HRs by cancer types when cell sizes were ≥ 5. We also stratified results by selected child/family characteristics. Likelihood ratio statistics generated interaction p values. Analyses included only subjects with known information. No data were missing for diagnosis year, birth year, or sex; 1.8% of subjects were missing race/ethnicity information. Some variables were not captured by birth records in all years: urban/rural residence and insurance were available only for 1987 or later (missing for 10.5% and 6.2% of subjects during years available, respectively); maternal education was captured 1992 or later (missing for 7.8% of subjects during years when available).

Because earlier outcomes may relate to treatment, we separately assessed outcomes for 5–9 years after diagnosis, and 10+ years after diagnosis when complications/recurrence were less likely. Possible effects of treatment changes by diagnosis year category were also assessed. Proportional hazards assumptions were evaluated using Schoenfeld residuals. Analyses were conducted using Stata V.14 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX) and R.

Results

Leukemia (26%), central nervous system (CNS) tumors (20%), and lymphomas (14%) were the most common cancers (Table 1). Cases were 48% female, and 5% non-white. During up to 27 years of follow-up, 12% of survivors and 5% of comparison children had ≥ 1 hospitalization; 4% of survivors and 0.3% of comparison children died. Median follow-up after index date was 9.1 years (range 0.1–27.0 years) for survivors, and 9.3 years (range 0.1–27.0 years) for comparison children. Median survivor age at last follow-up was 23.8 years.

Table 1 Childhood cancer survivors and comparison children born in Washington State, 1974–2008

Survivors had a hospitalization rate of 13.9/1,000 person-years, and a death rate of 4.5/1,000 person-years (Table 2). Greatest rates/1,000 person-years of non-cancer hospitalization/death among survivors were for infection (6.3), injuries (6.0), endocrine/metabolic (5.8), and nervous system conditions (5.1). Relative to comparison children, survivors had more than twice the hospitalization rate (HR 2.7, 95% CI 2.4–3.0) and 14.7 times the any-cause death rate (95% CI 11.3–19.1). HRs were increased for all hospitalization/death outcomes, ranging from 1.8 (95% CI 1.4–2.2) for mental health-, to 35.1 (95% CI 23.7–51.9) for cancer-related hospitalization/death. Increased HRs were observed for diabetes (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.9–5.9), and fracture (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1–2.3). Exclusion of cases with subsequent cancers resulted in HRs of 2.5 (95% CI 2.2–2.8), 29.0 (95% CI 19.3–43.6), and 12.3 (95% CI 9.3–16.3), for any hospitalization, cancer-related hospitalization, and all-cause death, respectively (data not shown). Patterns were generally similar when hospitalizations alone were examined; small numbers of cause-specific deaths precluded similar evaluation of patterns, although deaths were more common among survivors for all causes (Supplementary Table S2). Although our numbers were too small to examine cause-specific outcomes by age at diagnosis, all-cause mortality HRs ranged from 11.9 (95% CI 7.0–20.3) for children diagnosed between ages 15–19 years, to a high of 26.7 (14.7–48.6) for those diagnosed at 5–9 years; hospitalization HRs ranged from 2.6 (95% CI 2.1–3.3) for children diagnosed at 15–19 years and those diagnosed at < 5 years (95% CI 2.2–3.1), to 3.1 (95% CI 2.4–4.0) for those diagnosed at 10–14 years (Supplementary Table S3).

Table 2 Hospitalization, mortality, and hospitalization/death for selected conditions in 5-year childhood cancer survivors

For most conditions, absolute risks and HRs for 10+ years after diagnosis were lower than those 5–9 years after diagnosis, except for diabetes with HRs of 2.2 (95% CI 0.8–5.7) and 4.4 (95% CI 2.2–8.9) for earlier and later time periods, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3 Hazard ratios for non-pregnancy outcomes in childhood cancer survivors relative to children without cancer, by elapsed time since index date

Hospitalization HRs were greater in females (HR 3.2, 95% CI 2.7–3.8) than males (HR 2.4, 95% CI 2.0–2.8; interaction p = 0.004), and among those who received radiation therapy (HR 3.2, 95% 2.6–3.9) than those who did not (HR 2.5, 95% CI 2.2–2.9; interaction p = 0.04) (Supplementary Table S4). Risks were slightly greater for children born in rural (HR = 3.5, 95% CI 2.5–4.9) than urban areas (HR 3.0, 95% CI 2.4–3.7), but this may have been due to chance. HRs did not vary by type of insurance status (HRs = 3.2 for both private and Medicaid insurance types). With the exception of Hispanic children (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.5–4.6), HRs for all non-white race/ethnic group children were greater than that for white children (HR 2.6, 95% CI 2.3–3.0), ranging from 3.4 (95% CI 1.8–6.4) for Native Americans; 3.7 (95% CI 2.0–6.7) for African Americans; 3.8 (95% CI 2.0–7.3) for Asians; to 6.2 (95% CI 2.3–17.2) for Pacific Islanders.

When hospitalization and death were examined separately by childhood cancer type, relative to comparison children, hospitalization HRs were lowest for renal (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.6–2.2) and greatest for bone (HR 5.7, 95% CI 3.4–9.4) tumors (Fig. 1). HRs for any-cause death ranged from 4.9 (95% CI 1.2–18.8) for renal tumors to 30.6 (95% CI 17.1–54) for CNS tumors.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Relative hazards of hospitalization and all-cause mortality among 5+ year childhood cancer survivors, compared to children without cancer, by cancer type

To the extent possible, we also examined cause-specific outcomes (hospitalizations and/or death combined) by cancer type (Fig. 2). The greatest cancer type-specific HRs were observed for cancer-related hospitalization/death. HRs for most outcomes were increased for leukemia, lymphoma, and CNS tumors. CNS tumor survivors had the greatest HR for nervous system outcomes (HR 14.5, 95% CI 9.9–21.3). Bone tumor survivors had the greatest HR for musculoskeletal outcomes (HR 14.7, 95% CI 6.0–35.9) and injury (HR 11.4, 95% CI 5.6–23.3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Relative hazards of hospitalization/death by childhood cancer type among survivors and comparison children born in the same years

Discussion

Relatively few US studies have used population-based data to measure long-term childhood cancer outcomes [16, 17]. Population-based registries include all cancer types among all children, and avoid potential inaccuracies of self-reported outcomes [18, 19], or biases due to differential participation in research studies by demographic or other characteristics [20,21,22] or restriction to children at selected facilities or within clinical trial groups [10, 23]. Our analysis, enriched by additional registry data linkages, is based on an infrastructure that is potentially available to other states with similar health registries and linkage capacities. Replication of these analyses with pooled data across multiple states including those with large and diverse populations would provide more robust sub-analyses of different population-subgroups and help clarify some of the possible differences we observed across cancer types and by urban/rural location and race/ethnicity.

Our two-fold increased hospitalization risk among survivors is consistent with Utah registry data [16] and self-reported results compared to US population rates [24], but is lower than observed in Canadian registry data [25, 26]. This may have been due to our exclusion of pregnancy-related hospitalizations, and perhaps at least partly due to differences in health care systems (universal health care system vs. the private insurance/payer system in the US during a study period occurring largely prior to the Affordable Care Act in 2010). Excess hospitalizations ranged from 8 to 20 per 1,000 person-years across all subgroups, with slightly greater excesses for females, possibly some non-white groups, and children born in rural areas. The gender difference was expected [8, 17, 27] and has been suggested as due to women’s relatively increased risks of obesity, poor cardiac outcome, and second malignancies such as breast cancer [28]. Modest excesses observed in some non-white groups generally reflect results of earlier studies assessing self-reported morbidity [29]. Little is known about how rurality affects morbidity among survivors, but care access may be more limited outside urban areas with cancer centers. We observed somewhat greater rate differences/1,000 person-years in rural than in urban areas, but our assessment of this was limited to location at birth, so these results must be interpreted with caution.

Increased cardiovascular [16, 17, 25, 30, 31] and endocrine/metabolic [32, 33] morbidity is associated with selected cancer therapies. Diabetes as a specific outcome has been examined less often [34,35,36], and is often combined with general endocrine conditions including growth/other disorders that are more prevalent in survivors. An increased diabetes risk was expected [8, 27], but unlike most other outcomes, the risk of diabetes-related hospitalization or death that we observed increased over time since diagnosis. Small numbers precluded examination of this specific outcome by whether or not radiation was received, however, radiation damage to the pancreas during treatment may explain this result [37]. Other factors such as decreased physical activity [38,39,40], obesity [41], or inadequate diet [42] among survivors relative to comparison children likely also contribute.

The increased cardiovascular and cancer morbidities observed in these data were expected. Although North American registry-based studies [16, 25] suggest increased injury risk, fracture has been less studied. Decreased bone density, osteopenia, or osteoporosis have been demonstrated in children with several cancer types [43], and low bone density and fracture during treatment have been reported [44, 45]. We observed increased fracture risk consistent with some [46, 47] but not all studies [48]. Longer-term bone density may be decreased due to treatment [49], nutritional deficiencies, and reduced physical activity [49,50,51]. Despite decreased bone density, no increase in fracture rate was observed in a Finnish study of childhood 10+ year cancer survivors compared to controls [52] however, a twofold increased relative fracture rate by 5-years was observed in data from the UK General Practice Research Database [46], and US National Health Interview Survey data indicate increased self-reported fracture rates among adult survivors of childhood cancer [47]. Nearly 10% of adult survivors of childhood cancer (median age 32 years) with chemotherapy or radiation develop osteoporosis [53], compared to the US population prevalence of < 2% at age 50 years [54]. Fracture rates may be greater among children treated with dexamethasone [55]; as dexamethasone is increasingly used [56], it is possible that fracture risk among childhood cancer survivors may increase further in the future.

Mental health-related hospitalizations occur more often in survivors than population-based comparison groups [16, 25, 57], or siblings [58]. Most studies of self- or parent-reported mental status using sibling comparison groups [59,60,61] or population norms [62] generally support this. However, Danish registry data [57] demonstrated increased HRs vs. the general population, but not compared to siblings. Consistent with our data, risk may vary by cancer type [57, 62, 63]. The role of perceived prognosis or post-treatment disability within the relationships of different cancer types with survivors’ mental health status is unclear.

We were hampered by small numbers for some sub-analyses and were restricted to the initial treatment information available in the cancer registry, the latter being a general limitation of most population-based cancer registries. Our ability to assess possible effects of some characteristics (urban/rural residence, maternal education, insurance) was limited to years for which these were present on the birth record. Although hospitalizations and death events were objectively assessed with State-mandated reporting, we relied on diagnosis codes to assess causes and could not include serious outcomes treated solely in outpatient settings. Cancer-related hospitalizations were limited to those occurring at 20 years of age or older, which may have underestimated the risk of this outcome. Some subjects may have moved out-of-State during follow-up, preventing complete outcome ascertainment among all subjects. This may have resulted in under- or over-estimation of risks if outmigration was differential (e.g., if childhood cancer survivors were more or less likely than comparison subjects to migrate elsewhere to seek care, or less likely to migrate because they wished to stay closer to their families). US Census data indicate a great majority of people who move stay within-state, < 2% cite health concerns as reason for moving, and that migration rates in recent years have been decreasing and are the lowest they have been in at least 6 decades [64]. Although there is some evidence that childhood cancer survivors may more often reside with their parents [65] (which may have inflated our risk estimates), increasingly during 1975–2016 more young people in the US are living in their parents’ household than in any other arrangement [66], which would attenuate any bias due to this.

Childhood cancer survivors have increased risk of serious adverse outcomes years after diagnosis, with variation by cancer type and other characteristics. Less toxic therapies may reduce subsequent morbidities [67]. Our observation of increased fracture incidence suggests an additional intervention area. Multi-state pooling of registry data would enhance elucidation of specific outcomes by cancer type, and among population-subgroups.