Abstract
If self-interested behavior conflicts with the collective welfare, rules of cooperation are often installed to prevent egoistic behavior. We hypothesized that installing such rules may instigate personal moral norms of cooperation, but that they fail in doing so when installed by a leader who is self-interested rather than self-sacrificing. Three studies confirmed this and also showed that, consequently, only self-sacrificing leaders were able to install rules that increase cooperation without the need for a perfectly operating monitoring system.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bass, B.M.: 1985, Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations, (New York, Free Press).
Bass, B.M.: 2007, ‘From Transactional to Transformational Leadership: Learning to Share the Vision’, in R.P. Vecchio (ed.), Leadership: Understanding the Dynamics of Power and Influence in Organizations (2nd Ed.). (Notre Dame, IN US, University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 302-317.
Bosco, L. and L. Mittone: 1997, ‘Tax Evasion and Moral Constraints: Some Experimental Evidence’, Kyklos 50(3), 297.
Choi, Y. and R. Mai-Dalton: 1998, ‘On the Leadership Function of Self-Sacrifice’, Leadership Quarterly 9(4), 475.
Choi, Y. and R. Mai-Dalton: 1999, ‘The Model of Followers’ Responses to Self-Sacrificial Leadership: An Empirical Test’, The Leadership Quarterly 10(3), 397-421.
Cooter, R.: 1998, ‘Expressive Law and Economics’, Journal of Legal Studies 27(2), 585-608.
De Cremer, D.: 2002, ‘Charismatic Leadership and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Matter of Transforming Motives?’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32(5), 997-1016.
De Cremer, D., D.M. Mayer, M. Van Dijke, B.C. Schouten and M. Bardes: 2009, ‘When does Self-Sacrificial Leadership Motivate Prosocial Behavior? it Depends on Followers’ Prevention Focus’, Journal of Applied Psychology 94(4), 887-899.
De Cremer, D. and E. Van Dijk: 2005, ‘When and Why Leaders Put Themselves First: Leader Behaviour in Resource Allocations as a Function of Feeling Entitled’, European Journal of Social Psychology 35(4), 553-563.
De Cremer, D. and E. Van Dijk: 2008, ‘Leader-Follower Effects in Resource Dilemmas: The Roles of Leadership Selection and Social Responsibility’, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 11(3), 355-369.
De Cremer, D. and D. van Knippenberg: 2005, ‘Cooperation as a Function of Leader Self-Sacrifice, Trust, and Identification’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal 26(5), 355-369.
De Cremer, D., D. Van Knippenberg, M. Van Dijke and A.E.R. Bos: 2006, ‘Self-Sacrificial Leadership and Follower Self-Esteem: When Collective Identification Matters’, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 10(3), 233-245.
Deci, E.L. and R.M. Ryan: 2000, ‘The Support of Autonomy and the Control of Behavior’, in E.T. Higgins and A.W. Kruglanski (eds.), Motivational Science: Social and Personality Perspectives. Key Reading in Social Psychology. (Philadelphia, Psychology Press), pp. 128-145.
Gardner, W. L. and D. Cleavenger: 1998, ‘The Impression Management Strategies Associated with Transformational Leadership at the World-Class Level: A Psychohistorical Assessment’, Management Communication Quarterly 12, 3–41
Gneezy, U. and A. Rustichini: 2000, ‘A Fine is a Price’, Journal of Legal Studies 29, 1-17.
Hofmann, E., E. Hoelzl and E. Kirchler: 2008, ‘Preconditions of Voluntary Tax Compliance: Knowledge and Evaluation of Taxation, Norms, Fairness, and Motivation to Cooperate’, Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology 216(4), 209-217.
Keltner, D., C.A. Langner and M.L. Allison: 2006, ‘Power and Moral Leadership’, in D.L. Rhode (ed.), Moral Leadership: The Theory and Practice of Power, Judgment and Policy. (San Francisco, CA US, Jossey-Bass), pp. 177-194.
Kerr, N.L., J. Garst, D.A. Lewandowski and S.E. Harris: 1997, ‘That Still, Small Voice: Commitment to Cooperate as an Internalized Versus a Social Norm’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23(12), 1300-1311.
Mayer, R.C., J.H. Davis and F.D. Schoorman: 1995, ‘An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust’, Academy of Management Review 20(3), 709-734.
McAdams, R.H.: 2000, ‘An Attitudinal Theory of Expressive Law’, Oregon Law Review 79(2), 339.
Messick, D.M., H.A.M. Wilke, M. Brewer, R.M. Kramer, P. English Zemke and L. Lui: 1983, ‘Individual Adaptations and Structural Change as Solutions to Social Dilemmas’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44(2), 294-309.
Mulder, L.B.: 2008, ‘The Difference between Punishments and Rewards in Fostering Moral Concerns in Social Decision Making’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44, 1436-1443.
Mulder, L.B.: 2009, ‘The Two-Fold Influence of Sanctions on Moral Norms.’, in D. De Cremer (ed.), Psychological Perspectives on Ethical Behavior and Decision Making, (Charlotte, NC, Information Age Publishing), pp. 169-180.
Mulder, L.B., E. Van Dijk, D. De Cremer and H.A.M. Wilke: 2006, ‘When Sanctions Fail to Increase Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: Considering the Presence of an Alternative Defection Option’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32(10), 1312-1324.
Mulder, L.B., P. Verboon and D. De Cremer: 2009, ‘Sanctions and Moral Judgments: The Moderating Effect of Sanction Severity and Trust in Authorities’, European Journal of Social Psychology 39(2), 255-269.
Muller, D., C.M. Judd and V.Y. Yzerbyt: 2005, ‘When Moderation is Mediated and Mediation is Moderated’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89(6), 852-863.
Petty, R.E. and D.T. Wegener: 1998, ‘Attitude Change: Multiple Roles for Persuasion Variables’, in G. Lindzey (ed.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vols. 1 and 2 (4th Ed.). (New York, NY US, McGraw-Hill), pp. 323-390.
Preacher, K.J., D.D. Rucker and A.F. Hayes: 2007, ‘Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions’, Multivariate Behavioral Research 42(1), 185-227.
Prendergast, C.: 1999, ‘The Provision of Incentives in Firms’, Journal of Economic Literature 37, 7-63.
Ryan, R.M. and E.L. Deci: 2006, ‘Self-Regulation and the Problem of Human Autonomy: Does Psychology Need Choice, Self-Determination, and Will?’, Journal of Personality 74(6), 1557-1586.
Samuelson, C.D. and S.T. Allison: 1994, ‘Cognitive Factors Affecting the use of Social Decision Heuristics in Resource-Sharing Tasks’, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 58(1), 1-27.
Schwartz, R.D. and S. Orleans: 1969, ‘On Legal Sanctions’, in L.M. Friedman and S. Macauly (eds.), Law and the Behavioral Sciences, (Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merril Company.), pp. 311-330.
Shamir, B., R.J. House and M.B. Arthur: 1993, ‘The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-Concept Based Theory’, Organization Science 4(4), 577-594.
Tenbrunsel, A.E. and D.M. Messick: 1999, ‘Sanctioning Systems, Decision Frames, and Cooperation’, Administrative Science Quarterly 44(4), 684-707.
Tenbrunsel, A.E., K.A. Wade Benzoni, D.M. Messick and M.H. Bazerman: 1997, ‘The Dysfunctional Aspects of Environmental Standards’, in M.H. Bazerman, D. Messick, A.E. Tenbrunsel and K.A. Wade Benzoni (eds.), Environment, Ethics, and Behavior: The Psychology of Environmental Valuation and Degradation. (San Francisco, CA, The New Lexington Press), pp. 105-121.
Tenbrunsel, A.E., K.A. Wade Benzoni, D.M. Messick and M.H. Bazerman: 2000, ‘Understanding the Influence of Environmental Standards on Judgments and Choices’, Academy of Management Journal 43(5), 854-866.
Van Dijk, E. and D. De Cremer: 2006, ‘Self-Benefiting in the Allocation of Scarce Resources: Leader-Follower Effects and the Moderating Effect of Social Value Orientations’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32(10), 1352-1361.
Van Dijke, M. and D. De Cremer: 2010, ‘Procedural Fairness and Endorsement of Prototypical Leaders: Leader Benevolence Or Follower Control?’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46(1), 85-96.
Van Prooijen, J.W., M. Gallucci and G. Toeset: 2008, ‘Procedural Justice in Punishment Systems: Inconsistent Punishment Procedures have Detrimental Effects on Cooperation’, British Journal of Social Psychology 47(2), 311-324.
Vansteenkiste, M., W. Lens and E.L. Deci: 2006, ‘Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Goal Contents in Self-Determination Theory: Another Look at the Quality of Academic Motivation’, Educational Psychologist 41(1), 19-31.
Wenzel, M.: 2004a, ‘An Analysis of Norm Processes in Tax Compliance’, Journal of Economic Psychology 25, 213-228.
Wenzel, M.: 2004b, ‘The Social Side of Sanctions: Personal and Social Norms as Moderators of Deterrence’, Law and Human Behavior 28(5), 547-567.
Wenzel, M.: 2005, ‘Motivation Or Rationalisation? Causal Relations between Ethics, Norms and Tax Compliance’, Journal of Economic Psychology 26(4), 491-508.
Yorges, S.L., H.M. Weiss and O.J. Strickland: 1999, ‘The Effect of Leader Outcomes on Influence, Attributions, and Perceptions of Charisma’, Journal of Applied Psychology 84(3), 428-436.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mulder, L.B., Nelissen, R.M.A. When Rules Really Make a Difference: The Effect of Cooperation Rules and Self-Sacrificing Leadership on Moral Norms in Social Dilemmas. J Bus Ethics 95 (Suppl 1), 57–72 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0795-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0795-z