Introduction

Despite treatment improvements, further advancement is needed to improve treatment and extend the lives of women affected with breast cancer. There are promising results showing that long-chain n3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFA), primarily eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; C20:5n-3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; C22:6n-3), can reduce the growth of human breast tumor cells in vitro [14] and in experimental models of breast cancer [59]. A key mechanism for anti-cancer effects of n-3 LCPUFA is via incorporation into membrane phospholipid (PL) and their subsequent effect on membrane-mediated functions and signals (reviewed by [10]). Changes in n-3 LCPUFA content in membrane lipids have been associated with changes in membrane content of the CD95 death receptor [2], raft-associated epidermal growth factor receptor and phosphorylation [2, 4, 11], and changes in caspases, pro-apoptotic proteins, and NF-kB, all which ultimately reduce cell survival [10, 1214]. N-3 LCPUFA are preferentially enriched in the membrane PL, primarily phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylcholine (PC), and phosphatidylinositol (PI) [15]. These PLs are involved in many functions that could alter cell growth or death. For example, PE serves as chaperone for proteins moving from cytoplasm to membrane [16], and PC and PI are sources of diacylglycerol for signaling function [17, 18]. Changes in the n-3 fatty acid composition of PC have been demonstrated to reduce tumor cell growth, and alternations in PE composition lead to mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis [16, 18, 19]. PI is a major source of arachidonic acid (AA; 20:4n-6), important for eicosanoid synthesis [17], compounds which promote tumor progression and metastasis [20].

α-Linolenic acid (ALA; C18:3n-3) is the main dietary source of n-3 fatty acids, but most studies do not find the same anti-cancer activity [1, 21, 22] as EPA and DHA. This might be due to the limited conversion in vivo [23, 24] to EPA and DHA. Feeding stearidonic acid (SDA; C18:4n-3), however, has been demonstrated to increase tissue EPA content [22, 25], overcoming to some extent the requirement for the ∆6-desaturase-catalyzed reaction (Fig. 1). SDA has also been shown to have inhibitory effect on cell growth in colorectal cancer and fibroblast cells [21, 26], but its effect has not been studied in breast cancer cells. SDA exists in low amounts in the diet but SDA-enriched seed oils have been produced by genetic engineering, the introduction of a ∆6-desaturase in both flax (Linum usitatissimum) [27, 28] and soybean (Glycine max) [29, 30]. Although these enriched seed oils contain moderate concentrations of SDA (10–15 %) [27, 28], they also contain appreciable amounts of n-6 fatty acids [3, 3133], which may negate the potential n-3 anti-cancer activity. The objective of this study was to determine the anti-cancer effect and incorporation in breast cancer cell PL in vitro and in vivo of the fatty acids in a genetically modified flax containing SDA.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic diagram of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids desaturation and elongation from their precursors. Enzyme catalyzing each conversion is shown

Materials and methods

Production and identification of stearidonic acid-enriched flax oil (SO)

The Δ6-DESATURASE gene isolated from Pythium irregular [34] was amplified using two primers with BglII and NcoI restriction sites. The Δ6-ELONGASE gene from Thraustochytrium sp was re-amplified from BJ5 [35] using the primers with NotI and XbaI. Genes were cloned separately into pCR4-TOPO TA cloning vector, and subsequently released from the intermediate vector and cloned, respectively, into the cloning sites of pUC19 under control of the Cnl1 flax seed-specific promoter and OCS terminator. The two-gene cassette was released from the pUC19, blunt ended with Pfu end filling, and inserted into a plant expression vector pX1. Flax line F06396B was transformed by Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation technique [36], with some modifications. Surface-sterilized seeds were grown in Murashige and Skoog salt medium supplemented with sucrose (15 g L−1). Hypocotyl explant segments were then co-cultivated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens cell culture (containing pX1 vector) of OD600 = 0.5 for 2 h. The explants were then cultured on F2 medium (Murashige and Skoog salts with 1.20 mg L−1 benzyl adenine and 0.08 mg L−1 1-naphthaleneacetic acid) for 2 days. The callus and shoots were induced by repeated sub-culturing of the explants, and the green shoots were placed in shoot development medium containing 2.0 mg L−1 indole-3-butyric acid and 0.1 mg L−1 1-naphthaleneacetic acid for few weeks. Shoots were transferred to root-inducing medium, and plants were moved into soil once good root was developed.

Developing embryos from transformed plants were cultured on selection plates containing kanamycin to determine their segregation ratio. Transgenic plants were grown to subsequent generations until they became homozygous and increased through propagation of plants in controlled growth chambers (16 h light at 21 °C and 600 ppm CO2/8 h dark at 16 °C and 400 ppm CO2; approximately 1,300 μ mol m−2 s−1 light intensity) using ProMix BX potting soil (J.R. Johnson Supply, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The fatty acid composition of the seed oil from a regular flax line, breeding line F06396B (n = 4), and SDA flax (n = 5) was determined by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry.

Cell culture experiments

MDA-MB-231 (ER-/PR-) cells were maintained in Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium; MCF-7 (ER+/PR+) cells in Minimal Essential Medium with 10 µg/ml insulin; and 1 % sodium pyruvate and MCF-12A (non-tumorigenic) cells in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium with 20 ng/mL epidermal growth factor, 100 ng/ml cholera toxin, 500 ng/ml hydrocortisone, and 10 µg/mL insulin. All media were supplemented with 5 % v/v fetal calf serum (FCS) and 1 % v/v penicillin and streptomycin (all media components from Life Technologies, Burlington, ON, Canada, cell lines from American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) and maintained in 75 cm2 tissue culture flasks (Fisher Scientific, Ottawa, ON, Canada) at 37 °C in 5 % CO2 at 98 % relative humidity.

Palmitic acid (PA; C16:0), stearic acid (SA; C18:0), γ-linolenic acid (GLA; C18:3n-6), ALA, and eicosadienoic acid (EDA; C20:2n-6) from NuChek Prep Inc (Elysian, MN, USA), and oleic acid (OA; C18:1n-9), linoleic acid (LA; C18:2n-6), and SDA from Matreya (Pleasant Gap, PA, USA) were conjugated to bovine serum albumin (Fisher Scientific, Edmonton, AB, Canada) as previously described [2]. Cells were plated in triplicate at a density of 2.6 × 104 cells per well for MDA-MB-231 and MCF-12A cells, and 5.2 × 104 cells per well for MCF-7 cells in a 24-well plate (Corning Inc., Tewksbury, MA, USA) for 72 h. Cells were then treated in triplicate with a mixture of fatty acids (PA (6.0 %), SA (3.1 %), OA (13.4 %), LA (3.4 %), GLA (15.0 %), ALA (31.2 %), SDA (26.1 %), and EDA (0.7 %)) that represented the major fatty acids in the SO lipid. The treatment concentration of 150 µM was determined in a pilot dose study with MDA-MB-231 (Fig. 2a) and the growth inhibitor effects confirmed in the MCF-7 cells (Fig. 2b). Treatment media were replaced daily. All conditions were supplemented with 40 μM OA and LA. This was previously found to provide sufficient fatty acids to maintain growth and ensure sufficient n-6 fatty acids to maintain AA concentrations in the tumor [2]. After 48 h, media were removed, cells detached (0.25 % trypsin, Fisher Scientific, Ottawa, ON, Canada), and the number of viable (trypan blue excluded) cells counted under a microscope.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of SO fatty acid mixture on cell viability of MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and MCF-12A cells. a Effect of different concentrations of SO fatty acid mixture (25–300 μM) on MDA-MB-231 cells, b effect of treating MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and MCF-12A cells with 150 μM SO fatty acid mixture. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 3 per cell line per treatment), expressed as percentage of the control, a mixture of oleic acid (OA, C18:1n-9) and linoleic acid (LA, C18:2n-6). Asterisk indicates a significant difference compared to control (p < 0.05), hash indicates a significant difference to MCF-12A. The control is set at 100 % for all cell lines so only one bar is shown

Experimental animals and diet

Animal experiments were reviewed and approved by the University of Alberta Animal Policy and Welfare Committee and were in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines. Diets were nutritionally complete and contained 20 % w/w fat [6, 37]. The fatty acid composition of the diets (Table 1) was achieved by blending oils (Supplementary Table 1) so as to obtain a polyunsaturated to saturated ratio of 0.5 and a SDA content in the SO diet of 4 % w/w fat. Diets were irradiated for 72 h at 8 kGy and stored at −20 °C until used. Fatty acid analysis by GC pre- and post-irradiation confirmed that the fat composition was not altered by irradiation (data not shown).

Table 1 Fatty acid composition of control diet and stearidonic acid-enriched seed oils (SO diet) for nu/nu mice

Immunodeficient 6-week-old female nu/nu mice (Charles River Laboratories International, Inc) were housed in bio-containment under aseptic conditions with autoclaved bedding and water. After 3 days of feeding the control diet (Table 1), MDA-MB-231 cells (2 × 106 cells/100 μL in 5 % FCS Iscove’s media) were injected subcutaneously below the upper right scapula [38]. Mice were fed control diet ad libitum until the tumor reached approximately 50 mm3 [39, 40], and then randomized (n = 5 each group) to a diet (Table 1) for 4 weeks. Mice were euthanized and tumors were carefully removed, weighed, flash frozen for lipid extraction, fixed with formalin for immunohistochemistry, or homogenized for protein analysis. The individuals performing the excision and weighing of the tumor and all subsequent assays were blinded to the treatments.

Analysis of cells and tumors

Lipids from cultured cells or tumors were extracted using a modified Folch procedure [41, 42]. PL fatty acid composition of total PL or the major PL classes (separated by thin layer chromatography) was determined by gas–liquid chromatography as previously reported [43]. Following treatment of MDA-MB-231 with SO, cells were prepared for flow cytometry as described [2]. Cells incubated with anti-CD95 or isotope control (BD Biosciences, Mississauga, ON, Canada) were analyzed on a FACSCanto™ II (BD Biosciences, Mississauga, ON, Canada) and quantified using Kaluza software.

Homogenized tumor tissue and MDA-MB-231 whole cell lysates were prepared for Western blot analysis as described [4]. Primary antibodies to CD95, Bid, Bad, GAPDH (loading control) (Cell Signaling Technology, Whitby, ON, Canada), and caspase-10 (Abcam, Toronto, ON, Canada) were used. Membranes were developed using Pierce ECL 2 Western Blotting Substrate (Fisher Scientific, Edmonton, AB, Canada), visualized on a Typhoon™ Trio+ variable mode imager (GE Life Sciences, Baie d’Urfe, PQ, Canada) and relative intensities of band signals quantified using ImageQuant TL software.

Tumor sections were stained with anti-CD95, and the reactive cells were visualized using ImmunoDetector liquid DAB (Bio SB Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, USA). Apoptotic cells were identified using ApopTag plus peroxidase in situ apoptosis detection kit (EMD Millipore Corporation, Etobicoke, ON, Canada), according to manufacturer’s recommendation. Sections were imaged using AxioCam (Carl Zeiss microscopy), and the proportion of positive cells was determined.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS, version 21. Data were tested for normal distribution and once confirmed analyzed by one-way analysis of variance ANOVA, followed by post hoc analysis using Tukey’s test to identify significant (p < 0.05) difference among fatty acids and treatments. To compare differences between diet treatments in the tumor study or SO treatment in cell culture, unpaired t-tests were performed.

Results

Production of the SDA-enriched flax seed oil

FA analysis of transgenic flax seeds indicated that several new FAs were produced compared with the non-transformed flax (Supplementary Table 1). Among them, SDA was the most abundant, approximately 26 % of total FA, followed by GLA of approximately 15 %.

In vitro cell growth

The number of viable MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells was lower (p < 0.05), 84.8 and 81.4 %, respectively, in response to the mixture of fatty acids representing SO oil, compared to the control (Fig. 2b). Cell viability of the non-malignant MCF-12A cells did not differ significantly compared to control and was greater (p < 0.05) than MCF-7 or MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 2b).

Effect of feeding the SO diet on food intake, body, and tumor weight

There was no difference in body weight (Fig. 3a) and average daily food intake (Fig. 3b) of MDA-MB-231 tumor-bearing nu/nu mice fed the control or the SO diet, respectively. The final tumor weight was significantly lower with SO diet compared to the control (Fig. 3c).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of control diet or stearidonic acid-enriched (SO) diet on body weight, food intake, and the growth of MDA-MB-231 tumors in nu/nu mice. After injection of cancer cells, animals were maintained on a control diet for 4 weeks, and then either a control diet or SO diet for an additional 4 weeks. a Changes in body weight, b average daily food intake, and c at the end of the experiment, each tumor was removed and weighed. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 5 per treatment). Asterisks indicate a significant difference between control and SO diet (p < 0.05)

Effect of SO treatment on total PL fatty acid composition of cultured cells

After SO treatment, the major components of SDA-enriched oil, SDA (Fig. 4a), and GLA were higher in the PL of MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and MCF-12A compared to control treatment (Supplementary Table 2). In response to SO treatment, the levels of fatty acids intermediate eicosatrienoic acid (ETE, 20:3n-3) were higher in MCF-12A and eicosatetraenoic acid (ETA, C20:4n-3) higher in all cell lines; however, DHA levels were similar to those in control-treated cells (Supplementary Table 2). The concentration of EPA (Fig. 4b) was higher in the PL of all cell lines, and the levels of docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) (Fig. 4c) and dihomo γ-linoleic acid (DGLA, C20:3n-6) (Supplementary Table 2) were higher only in the PL of tumorigenic cells. The relative concentration of AA increased significantly in MDA-MB-231 and 2-fold in MCF-7 after SO treatment but did not change in MCF-12A cells (Fig. 4d).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Whole cell phospholipid composition in MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and MCF-12A in response to SO mixture of fatty acids compared to mixture of oleic acid and linoleic acid (OA, C18:1n-9/LA, C18:2n-6) as a control. a Stearidonic acid (SDA, C18:4n-3), b eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, C20:5n-3), c docosapentaenoic acid (DPA, 22:5n-3), and d Arachidonic acid (AA, C20:4n-6). Values are mean percent composition ± SEM (n = 3–5 per cell line treatment) corresponding to (OA/LA) as control. Asterisks indicate a significant difference compared to respective control treatment (p < 0.05)

Fatty acid composition of PL classes in vivo and in vitro

SDA concentration was increased in PC, PE, and PI of SO tumors (Fig. 5a). EPA increased in PC and PE (Figs. 5b, 6a), and DPA increased in PC, PE, and PI (Figs. 5c, 6b) both in vivo and in vitro. Tumors had lower AA in PE and PI in the SO diet group, whereas cultured cells had an increase of AA in PC and PE (Figs. 5d, 6c). The relative proportion of DGLA in PC and PE, and ETA in PC, PE, PI, and PS was increased with SO diet, however, that of DHA did not differ in PL classes (Supplementary Table 3).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Fatty acid composition of major phospholipid classes in MDA-MB-231 tumors implanted into nu/nu mice fed either a control or stearidonic acid-enriched (SO) diet. a Stearidonic acid (SDA, C18:4n-3), b eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, C20:5n-3), c docosapentaenoic acid (DPA, C22:5n-3), and d arachidonic acid (AA, C20:4n-6). Values are shown as mean percentage ± SEM (n = 5 per treatment) corresponding to control. Asterisks indicate a significant difference compared to respective control (p < 0.05). PC phosphatidylcholine, PE phosphatidylethanolamine, PI phosphatidylinositol

Fig. 6
figure 6

Composition of fatty acids in major phospholipid classes in MDA-MB-231 cells treated with the SO mixture of fatty acids. a eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, C20:5n-3), b docosapentaenoic acid (DPA, 22:5n-3), and c arachidonic acid (AA, C20:4n-6). Values are mean percent composition ± SEM (n = 3). Asterisks indicate a significant differences between control and SO treatments (p < 0.05). PC phosphatidylcholine, PE phosphatidylethanolamine, PI phosphatidylinositol

CD95 expression and pro-apoptotic molecules in vitro and in vivo

Total surface expression of CD95 and downstream proteins caspase-10 and Bad were significantly higher in SO-treated MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 7a, b). SO tumors also had a higher proportion of CD95-positive cells (Fig. 8a, b, c), higher protein levels of CD95, caspase-10 and Bid (Fig. 8d), and more apoptotic cells (Fig. 9a, b, c) compared to control tumors.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Effect of SO fatty acid mixture on the proportion of Fas ligand receptor (CD95) and pro-apoptotic molecules in MDA-MB-231 cell. a Flow cytometry analysis of CD95+ cells, b Western blot analysis of caspase-10 and Bad. Values are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3–4 per treatment). Expression level of proteins is shown by relative fold change to control treatment (OA, C18:1n-9//LA, C18:2n-6) which is indicated by dotted line. Asterisks indicate a significant difference compared to control treatment (p < 0.05)

Fig. 8
figure 8

Effect of control diet or stearidonic acid-enriched (SO) diet on the expression of Fas ligand receptor (CD95) and pro-apoptotic molecules in MDA-MB-231 tumors from nu/nu mice. Immunohistochemical analysis of CD95 in tumors from nu/nu mice treated with a control diet and b SO diet. Positive staining is dark brown color outside of nuclei. Nuclei are green, stained with methyl green. Arrows indicate CD95+ cells. Scale bar represents 50 µM. c Relative quantitation of CD95+ cells. d Western blot analysis of CD95, caspase-10, and Bid. Expression level of proteins is shown by relative fold change to control which is indicated by dotted line. Values are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3–4 per treatment). Asterisks indicate a significant difference compared to control (p < 0.05)

Fig. 9
figure 9

Immunohistochemical study of apoptotic cell in tumor tissues by TUNEL staining in response to control diet or stearidonic acid-enriched (SO) diet. Representative images show apoptotic positive cells on tumors with a control diet and b SO diet. Arrows indicate cells undergoing apoptosis which are dark brown color specific to nucleus. Non-apoptotic nuclei are shown by green color after counterstain with methyl green. Scale bar indicates 50 µM. c Relative quantitation of TUNEL-positive cells, determined by the average percent of positive (apoptotic cells)/total number of cells counted from representative sections. Values indicate mean (%) ± SEM (n = 3 per treatment). Asterisk indicates a significant difference compared to control (p < 0.05)

Discussion

Treating MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells with SO fatty acids significantly reduced their growth. Feeding a diet containing SO, compared to a diet with a fat composition more similar to the North American population [44], reduced tumor growth of MDA-MB-231 cells in nu/nu mice. The SDA content of the SO produced from the current study was 26 % which was considerably higher than the 10–15 % reported in previous studies [27, 28]. This higher level of SDA is attributable to the use of high ALA (approximately 75 %) flax breeding line (F06396B). SO contained a mixture of fatty acids (ALA, SDA, and GLA in the highest concentration). Whether it was individual fatty acids in the SO or the combination of fatty acids that reduced tumor growth was not determined in the current study. The SDA content likely contributes to the anti-cancer effects as it has been demonstrated that feeding SDA, but not ALA, reduces tumor growth in an animal model of colorectal cancer [22]. Previous studies have reported tumor cell growth-promoting effects of LA and AA [31, 33], while GLA had variable effects depending on cell lines and doses [1, 45]. Our data suggest that GLA, at least in the concentrations used in the current study, does not promote tumor growth but may have contributed to the higher AA concentration, we observed in MDA-MB-231 cells in vitro. Interestingly, SO fatty acid mixture did not have inhibitory effect in non-tumorigenic cell line MCF-12A, suggesting that SO at the concentrations studied may have anti-growth effects only in human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells.

The anti-cancer effects of SO seen in this study were accompanied by evidence of tumor apoptosis (twofold) in mice bearing the MDA-MB-231 tumor, and an increased expression of CD95, caspase-10, and other pro-apoptotic molecules (Bid/Bad) in both tumors and cultured cells. Our earlier work in the same breast cancer cells reported that EPA and DHA increased apoptosis [4]. The results of the current study suggest that this was mediated by increased surface expression of CD95 that would subsequently activate caspase-8 or 10 [46, 47]. Several cancer drugs work via the activation of CD95 but cancer cells have shown to have a lower expression of CD95 [47, 48]. Feeding SO might offer a way to facilitate CD95-induced apoptosis.

Increases in EPA and DHA concentration of PL have been demonstrated to decrease cell proliferation and increase apoptosis, by changes in EGFR/AKT/NFkappaB cell survival pathway or by inducing CD95-mediated apoptosis [24, 15]. EPA, but not DHA, increased with SO treatment in the current study, and this fatty acid has been demonstrated to inhibit human breast cancers both in vitro [14, 4952] and in vivo [7, 50] and induce apoptosis [2, 4, 53]. DPA was increased with SO treatment by more than threefold in tumorigenic cells. Although proliferation was not measured specifically in the current study, DPA has been reported to decrease fatty acid synthase activity [54] which inhibits breast cancer cell growth [5557] and has inhibitory effects on angiogenesis (via VEGFR2 signaling) [58, 59]. Increased ETA in PL may also have contributed to the apoptotic activity as this fatty acid was reported to inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 [60, 61], which could increase apoptosis and decrease proliferation [62] and reduce the growth of breast tumors in mice [63, 64].

Feeding SDA has been shown to increase EPA and DPA in plasma, heart, and liver of healthy rodents, humans, and dogs [25, 65, 66]. A previous study in MDA-MB-231 cells reported that SDA treatment increased the concentrations of ETA, EPA, and DPA, the n-3 LCPUFA downstream from SDA [67]. Our study extended these findings by determining the changes in specific PL classes in MDA-MB-231 cells and tumors. Although SDA was incorporated into cells and tumor PL, the resulting proportion was very small. Both in vivo and in vitro EPA and DPA were incorporated to a greater extent into PE. PE is the major mediator of protein translocation [16], and our group has demonstrated that changes in the n-3 LCPUFA composition are associated with movement of CD95 into lipid rafts in the membrane of MDA-MB-231 cells [2]. A higher concentration of EPA and DPA occurred in the PC moiety with SO treatment/diet. The changes in those fatty acids in PC were associated with decreased cell proliferation and increased apoptosis in tumor cells [15]. The n-3 LC PUFA concentration of PI was also increased in vitro and in vivo by SO treatment. PI is the main source of diacylglycerol in the plasma membrane which via protein kinase C (PKC) hydrolysis produces signaling molecules [17] involved in apoptosis [68, 69]. PI is also very high in AA, and a significant decrease in the AA content of PI (also PE) was observed in tumors from mice fed the SO diet. It is possible that the anti-carcinogenic effect of SO on tumors could be via the reduction in the availability of precursor fatty acid AA in PL, particularly PI, for the biosynthesis of eicosanoids and other membrane-generated signals involved in tumor cell growth (reviewed by [70]). However, it is unlikely that this decreased availability of AA in PL is the primary mechanism for the anti-apoptotic effects in this tumor type as in vitro incubation with SO resulted in a higher concentration of AA in MDA-MB-231 (in PC and PE) and MCF-7 cells. The higher AA concentration in PL after in vitro treatment is most likely due to the presence of higher concentration of AA precursor GLA (15.0 %) in our SO fatty acid mixture (whereas in vivo it only contributed 2.5 % of total fat).

Interestingly, we observed the relative membrane change of major fatty acids DGLA, EPA, and DPA after SO treatment, which were higher in MDA-MB-231 followed by MCF-7 and MCF-12A, which could in part be due to the faster growth of the MDA-MB-231 cells [71]. In MCF-7, compared to MDA-MB-231 and MCF-12A cells, the lower concentration of many fatty acids in the elongation and saturation pathway beyond ALA and LA was likely due to limited ∆5- and ∆6-activity in MCF-7 [3] which is the major, albeit not the only method of two-carbon elongation in MCF-7 [3, 15, 72].

In conclusion, we demonstrated anti-cancer activity of SO on breast cancer cells and tumors. We are proposing that the change in membrane n-3 LCPUFA (ETA, EPA, and DPA) composition similar to what we previously reported for DHA [2] facilitated CD95-mediated tumor death. In addition, this study provided evidence of an alternative dietary source of n-3 LCPUFA that could be used in the future in clinical trials aimed at treating breast cancer.