Abstract
Direct numerical simulations of turbulent flow over regular arrays of urban-like, cubical obstacles are reported. Results are analysed in terms of a formal spatial averaging procedure to enable interpretation of the flow within the arrays as a canopy flow, and of the flow above as a rough wall boundary layer. Spatial averages of the mean velocity, turbulent stresses and pressure drag are computed. The statistics compare very well with data from wind-tunnel experiments. Within the arrays the time-averaged flow structure gives rise to significant ‘dispersive stress’ whereas above the Reynolds stress dominates. The mean flow structure and turbulence statistics depend significantly on the layout of the cubes. Unsteady effects are important, especially in the lower canopy layer where turbulent fluctuations dominate over the mean flow.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Belcher SE (2005) Mixing and transport in urban areas. Phil Trans Roy Soc 363:2947–2963
Belcher SE, Jerram N, Hunt JCR (2003) Adjustment of the atmospheric boundary layer to a canopy of roughness elements. J Fluid Mech 488:369–398
Bohm M, Finnigan JJ, Raupach MR (2000) Dispersive fluxes in canopy flows: just how important are they? Proc 24th conference on agricultural and forest meteorology, American Meteorological Society, Davis, CA
Britter RE, Hanna SR (2003) Flow and dispersion in urban areas. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 35:469–496
Castro IP, Robins AG (1977) The flow around a surface-mounted cube in uniform and turbulent streams. J Fluid Mech 79:307–335
Castro IP, Cheng H, Reynolds R (2006) Turbulence over urban-type roughness: deductions from wind tunnel measurements. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 118:109–131
Cheng H, Castro IP (2002) Near wall flow over urban-like roughness. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 104:229–259
Coceal O, Belcher SE (2004) A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 130:1349–1372
Coceal O, Belcher SE (2005) Mean winds through an inhomogeneous urban canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 115:47–68
Cui et al. (2004) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow in a street canyon. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 130:1373–1394
Delery JM (2001) Robert Legendre and Henri Werle: Toward the elucidation of three-dimensional separation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 33:129–154
Djenidi L, Elvarasan R, Antonia RA (1999) The turbulent boundary layer over transverse square cavities. J Fluid Mech 395:271–294
Finnigan JJ (1985) Turbulent transport in flexible plant canopies. In: Hutchinson BA, Hicks BB (eds) The Forest-Atmosphere Interaction
Finnigan JJ (2000) Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32:519–572
Hamilton JM, Kim J, Waleffe F (1995) Regeneration mechanisms of near-wall turbulence structures. J Fluid Mech 287:317–348
Hanna SR, Tehranian S, Carissimo B, Macdonald RW, Lohner R (2002) Comparisons of model simulations with observations of mean flow and turbulence within simple obstacle arrays. Atmos Environ 36:5067–5079
Hunt JCR, Durbin PA (1999) Perturbed vortical layers and shear sheltering. Fluid Dyn Res 24:375–404
Jackson PS (1981) On the displacement height in the logarithmic profile. J Fluid Mech 111:15–25
Jimenez J, Pinelli A (1999) The autonomous cycle of near-wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech 389:335–359
Jimenez J (2004) Turbulent flows over rough walls. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 36:173–196
Kanda M, Moriwaki R, Kasamatsu F (2004) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent organized structures within and above explicitly resolved cube arrays. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 112:343–368
Kendall JM (1985) Experimental study of disturbances produced in pre-transitional laminar boundary layer by weak free stream turbulence. AIAA Paper:85–1695
Leonardi S, Orlandi P, Smalley RJ, Djenidi L, Antonia RA (2003) Direct numerical simulations of turbulent channel flow with transverse square bars on one wall. J Fluid Mech 491:229–238
Macdonald RW, Griffiths RF, Hall DJ (1998) An improved method for the estimation of surface roughness of obstacle arrays. Atmos Environ 32:1857–1864
Macdonald RW (2000) Modelling the mean velocity profile in the urban canopy layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 97:25–45
Martilli A, Clappier A, Rotach MW (2002) An urban surface exchange parameterisation for mesoscale models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 104:261–304
Martinuzzi R, Tropea C (1993) The flow around surface-mounted, prismatic obstacles placed in a fully-developed channel flow. J Fluids Eng 115:85–92
Moin P, Mahesh K (1998) Direct numerical simulation: a tool in turbulence research. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 30:539–578
Pao TH (1965) Structure of turbulent velocity and scalar fields at large wave numbers. Phys Fluids 8:1063
Poggi D, Katul GG, Albertson JD (2004) A note on the contribution of dispersive fluxes to momentum transfer within canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 111:615–621
Raupach MR, Shaw RH (1982) Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 22:79–90
Raupach MR, Antonia RA, Rajagopalan S (1991) Rough-wall turbulent boundary layers. Appl Mecha Rev 44:1–25
Reynolds RT, Hayden P, Castro IP, Robins AG (2006) Spanwise variations in nominally rough-wall boundary layers. Expts Fluids In press
Snyder WH, Castro IP (2002) The critical Reynolds number for rough-wall boundary layers. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 90:41–54
Stoesser T, Mathey F, Frohlich J, Rodi W (2003) LES of flow over multiple cubes. ERCOFTAC Bull No. 56
Thomas TG, Yao YF, Sandham ND (2003) Structure and energetics of a turbulent trailing edge flow. Comput Math Appl 46:671–680
Tobak M, Peake DJ (1982) Topology of three-dimensional separated flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 14:61–85
Yao YF, Thomas TG, Sandham ND, Williams JJR (2001) Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a rectangular trailing edge. Theoret Comput Fluid Dyn 14:337–358
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coceal, O., Thomas, T.G., Castro, I.P. et al. Mean Flow and Turbulence Statistics Over Groups of Urban-like Cubical Obstacles. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 121, 491–519 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9076-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9076-2