Introduction

Compared with a two-dimensional culture dish, three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds are often preferred for the culture of cells to enable effective adhesion, multiplication, and tissue-specific differentiation (Cukierman et al. 2001; Maeno et al. 2005; Seo et al. 2006; Bang et al. 2011; Dorj et al. 2012). To perform the role of scaffolds, materials should be non-toxic and stimulate cellular interactions such as cell anchorage and spreading with tailored compositions and surface topology. Furthermore, scaffolds should be developed to have 3D porous structure with an open-channeled network that allows for nutrients to be supplied and cellular migration (Macchetta et al. 2009).

In addition to the scaffold structure, the scaffold type is one of the important parameters in the tissue engineering application. For example, injectable forms are among the most desirable types for the delivery of cells in a minimally invasive manner (Lee and Mooney 2001). Among the possible candidates for injectable carriers, microspherical forms have been an intriguing choice due to the larger surface area relative to the volume, which provides more chances for cell anchorage (Chun et al. 2004; Frauenschuh et al. 2007). Microspherical carriers prepared from either biopolymers or bioceramics have thus been developed to populate tissue cells, expand the cells to large quantity, and ultimately for use in injectable tissue engineering (Drury and Mooney 2003; Hoffman 2012). We have developed an elegant microcarrier form with a highly macroporous structure (Hong et al. 2009b; Jin et al. 2012; Park et al. 2013b). Pores formed throughout the microspheres take up more cells and provide them space and surface area to anchor, spread, and multiply.

Although the porous microcarriers in static cell cultures are dominantly used, their inherent limitations accompanied by the static culture are being constantly addressed, such as limited cell expansion relating to the viability and cell functions. Thus, a dynamic culture method including a spinner flask, rotating wall vessel, and flow perfusion system has been proposed as a promising approach to circumvent the limitations (Frith et al. 2009) with the aim of achieving better efficiencies in uniform cell population within scaffolds, as well as stimulating cellular proliferation and differentiation through the mechanical shear force involved.

Therefore, in this study we introduce porous microcarriers including poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and its blend with poly(d,l-lactide) (PLPC) for effective cell expansion under the spinner flask culture. We investigate the loading, proliferation and differentiation behaviors of pre-osteoblastic cells onto the two types of microcarriers during the dynamic culture, and address the in vivo applicability of the cell-microcarrier construct in a mouse subcutaneous model for 4 weeks.

Materials and methods

Microsphere preparation

Polycaprolactone (~80 kDa, Sigma-Aldrich) blended with poly(d,l-lactide) (PLDLA, l-lactide: d,l-lactide = 70:30, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was fabricated into porous microspheres as described in our previous report (Hong et al. 2009b). Briefly, PCL and PLDLA were dissolved separately in chloroform within a (w/v) at 10 wt%. As an oligomeric ester porogen, camphene (C10H16) was dissolved in a vial at 60 % (w/v). PLDLA/PCL solutions comprising PCL ratios of 1 and 3 % (w/w) relative to PLDLA, called PLPC1 and PLPC3, respectively, were mixed with the camphene solution and stirred for 3 h. The solution was dropped into a water pool containing 2 % (w/v) of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), gently stirred at 450 rpm at 4 °C, and additionally stirred for 4 h. Then, porous microspheres were obtained through filtration with a Millipore filter paper after washing with ice-cooled distilled water, and kept at 4 °C for further characterization and used after freeze-drying.

The macro-morphology and microstructure of the microspheres were examined with scanning electron microscopy. Optical microscope images of the microspheres were taken, and their diameter was measured from the images on three arbitrarily selected areas.

Water contact angle measurements

The hydrophilic surface of samples was assessed by measuring water contact angles using a contact angle analyzer (Phoenix 300, USA). The measurements were carried out at room temperature in air with deionized water as a probe liquid. To ensure consistency, each dispensing volume of water droplets was maintained at 6 μl, and each measurement was taken 5 s after dispensing. All presented data were the mean values of ten independent measurements.

Cell culture and seeding

MC3T3-E1 cells, a mouse calvaria-derived preosteoblast cell line, were cultured in α-modified minimum essential medium (α-MEM) supplemented with 10 % (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U penicillin/ml, and 100 mg streptomycin/ml. The cells were maintained in a humidified atmosphere of 5 % (v/v) CO2 at 37 °C. Before seeding cells, microspheres were sterilized with 70 % (v/v) ethanol for 2 h and washed with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) solution three times. One milliliter of 5 × 106 suspended cells were added to the pre-wetted microspheres of 60 mg with culture medium for 12 h, and cell/microsphere constructs were incubated under shaking with a sway of 45° at 3 rpm for 6 h using MyLab SLRM-3 Intelli-Mixer (SLRM-3, SeouLin Bioscience, South Korea).

Cell/microsphere constructs cultured in the spinner flask system

The cell/microsphere constructs were cultured in a spinner flask (S-flask 4500-1L, TAITEC, Japan) containing 70 ml α-MEM with 10 % (v/v) FBS culture medium at 37 °C in a 5 % CO2 incubator. The stirring speed was at 30 rpm. The experiments were carried out for 14 days, and sampling was done once every 7 days.

Cell growth analyses

The cell distribution image onto the microspheres was observed by Alexa Fluor 546-conjugated phalloidin (Invitrogen, USA) staining using an inverted fluorescence microscope. Cells grown on each group were fixed with 4 % (v/v) paraformaldehyde for 30 min, treated with 0.2 % Triton X-100 for 5 min, blocked with PBS containing 1 % (w/v) bovine serum albumin for 30 min, and then incubated with 20 nM Alexa Fluor 546-conjugated phalloidin diluted in PBS for 30 min. Fluorescence images were obtained using an inverted fluorescence microscope equipped with a DP-72 digital camera.

The cell growth level was assessed by means of a cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Japan). Briefly, at each time of culturing (1, 7, and 14 days), the CCK-8 reagent was added to each sample and incubated for 3 h at 37 °C. The absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 450 nM using a microplate reader.

The cell morphology was observed by SEM at an accelerated voltage of 15 kV after fixation with 2.5 % (v/v) glutaraldehyde, dehydration with a graded series of ethanol (75, 90, 95 and 100 %), treatment with a hexamethyldisilazane solution, and gold coating.

Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assay

The osteoblastic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells constructed with the microspheres was assessed by ALP staining. At each time of culturing (7 and 14 days), the constructs were fixed, and ALP staining was performed with an ALP color development kit (Takara, Japan) for 1 h. The samples stained in violet were observed by an optical microscope.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Quantitative assay of bone-associated genes expressed on day 7 and 14, including collagen type I (Col I) and ALP, was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR. The first strand cDNA was synthesized from the total RNA (1 μg) using a SuperScript first strand synthesis system for reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR, Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time PCR was performed using SYBR GreenER qPCR SuperMix reagents (Invitrogen). The relative transcript quantities were calculated using a ΔΔCt method with GAPDH, as an endogenous reference gene amplified from the samples. The primer sequences of the genes are as follows: Col I: forward 5′-GCAACTCTGAAATCTCTCAA-3′; reverse 5′-GATCCATAGTACATCCT-TG-3′. ALP: forward 5′-ACACCTTGACTGTGGTTACT-3′; reverse 5′-CCTTGTAGCCAG-GCCCGTTA-3′. GAPDH: forward 5′-TGTTCCAGTATGACTCCACT-3′; reverse 5′-TGGT-GAAGACACCAGTAGAC-3′.

In vivo animal study

Experimental procedures for the in vivo animal study were approved by the Dankook University Institutional Animal Care Committee. Ten-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into two groups (three mice per group). The animals were anesthetized by intramuscular injection of a mixture of xylazine (10 mg/kg; Rompun, Bayer Korea, Korea) and ketamine (80 mg/kg; Ketara, Yuhan, Korea). Small incisions were made on the dorsal skin. Two pouches per animal were created by blunt dissection of subcutaneous sites, and the cell-microsphere constructs were immediately implanted into each pouch. The grafts were harvested at 4 weeks after implantation.

Histological analysis of in vivo grafts

The grafts were fixed in a 10 % (v/v) formaldehyde for histological analyses. The specimens were embedded in paraffin, cut to a thickness of 8 μm, and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Masson Trichrome for morphologic analyses.

Statistical analysis

Data were shown as the mean ± one standard deviation. Statistical comparisons were made using a one-way ANOVA test. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results and discussion

Microspheres

Figure 1a shows a schematic illustration representing the experimental procedures used in this study and a clinically feasible application. The PLDLA/PCL/camphene composite solution in chloroform was solidified to form spheroids with the aid of a PVA surfactant, during which the camphene was sublimated to result in highly interconnected pore networks throughout the microspheres (Hong et al. 2009a). The average size of the obtained microspheres was approximately 350 μm diameter, which is considered to be proper to populate tissue cells. The six-times-higher amount of camphene relative to polymer was optimal for the preparation of the microspheres with well-developed pore structure, according to our previous studies (Hong et al. 2009b; Park et al. 2013b). Figure 1b shows the typical morphology of microspheres with different biopolymer compositions (PCL, PLPC3, PLPC1, and PLDLA) generated after the camphene sublimation. Regular-sized large pores (~100 μm) and small pores (~50 μm) between the large pores were generated in PCL and PLCL3 microspheres, which is known to be a suitable pore structure for cell penetration and growth (Lee et al. 2008; Park et al. 2013a). In contrast, PLCL1 microspheres showed irregular and relatively small-sized pores that cannot be considered effective for cell loading in tissue engineering. The pure PLDLA microspheres showed a smooth surface with no pores.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Schematic illustration showing the fabrication of biopolymer microcarriers with a highly porous structure for effective cell culture and expansion, as well as their injectable applications for bone tissue engineering. b SEM morphology showing porous structure of PCL, PLPC3, PLPC1, and PLDLA microcarriers. c Water contact angle measurements of these biopolymer microcarriers. Contact angle data are shown as the mean ± SD from ten measurements

In addition to the scaffold structure, the scaffold surface plays an important role in cell adhesion and compatibility. Hydrophilic substrates are more favorable for tissue compatibility, and largely depend on surface energy (Kilpadi and Lemons 1994), considerably promoting the rate and extent of bone formation (Zhao et al. 2005). Despite excellent pore structure, PCL scaffolds are relatively hydrophobic and much effort has been made to improve their hydrophilicity (Yu et al. 2009; Xu et al. 2010; Jin et al. 2011a, b). We thus examined the hydrophilicity of PLDLA, PLPC1, PLPC3, and PCL materials by measuring water contact angles on the sample surface, as shown in Fig. 1c. The water contact angle of PCL decreased substantially due to the blending with PLDLA (82° for PCL, 60° for the blends, and 56° for PLDLA). The enhanced water affinity in the blend will affect the initial cell adhesion. Furthermore, the biodegradation of PLDLA is known to be much faster than that of PCL, which also influences the cellular responses, particularly in later periods. Based on the morphological and physico-chemical traits, the PCL and PLPC3 were chosen as microcarriers for further tests of the dynamic cell culture.

This type of porous-structured microcarriers has previously been produced including our group (Jin et al. 2012; Park et al. 2013b). A number of preparation techniques for porous microcarriers have been developed on the basis of conventional methods, such as phase separation (Madihally and Matthew 1999; Fang et al. 2014) and emulsion evaporation (Crotts and Park 1995; Brown et al. 2008). Compared to these conventional methods, a camphene sublimation technique fabricates much larger pore channels into porous microcarriers. Furthermore, compared to PCL porous microcarrier, which was also generated for the culture of cells, the blended composition PLPC3 showed improved surface wettability and possibly higher degradation rate, which is considered to be beneficial for the cellular adhesion and proliferation.

Cell adhesion and proliferation on the microsphere surface

A uniform distribution of isolated cells within the spherical porous scaffolds is the first step in establishing 3D culture and further bone tissue formation. In general, when cells were populated throughout the scaffold at high density and uniformly, the tissue formation was enhanced (Hutmacher 2000). Hence, the initial cell distribution within the scaffold after seeding could establish the basis of uniform tissue formation. In this regard, we investigated the initial cell distribution and expansion on the porous microcarriers. Figure 2a shows phalloidin-fluorescent images of cell constructs with the PCL and PLPC porous microcarriers at 6 h after shaking incubation with a sway of 45° at 3 rpm. The fluorescence spots corresponding to cell constructs were more vividly shown in the PLPC porous microcarriers than those shown in PCL microcarriers, indicating that the cell plating efficiency was higher on PLPC than on PCL porous microcarriers despite their similar pore structure. Next, the optimal rotation speed was determined.

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Fluorescence images of cells initially loaded onto microcarriers (PCL and PLPC3) for 6 h with sway of 45° at 3 rpm. b Cell expansion rates on the microcarriers recorded for up to 14 days at different rotating speed (30 and 50 rpm), by CCK-8 assay. c Fluorescence images of cells expanded over 14 days onto microspheres (PCL and PLPC3) at 30 rpm. Actin cytoskeletons were stained with Alexa Fluor 546-conjugated phalloidin (orange). Scale bars 400 μm. d SEM micrographs of cells expanded on the microcarriers for 7 and 14 days (color figure online)

The minimum speed of our commercially-available spinner flasks used in this study is 30 rpm, at which the porous microcarriers are just fully suspended. The viability results of cells cultured on the porous microcarriers were compared and analyzed at 30 and 50 rpm for up to 14 days (Fig. 2b). Initially (at 1 day), cells adhered better on the PLPC than on the PCL at both rotation speeds. The adherent cells proliferated actively on the porous microcarriers with culture time up to 14 days, and the culture conditions at 30 rpm of the PLPC porous microcarriers showed the highest cell viability during the culture period. The higher water affinity of PLPC should favor cellular adhesion processes, including cell anchorage and spreading, which subsequently increase cell growth and mitosis (Ehrlich et al. 2002; Borghi et al. 2010; Kitt and Nelson 2011).

Subsequently, cell/microcarrier constructs were captured at 30 rpm to confirm the cell expansion rates under the dynamic culture. Figure 2c shows phalloidin-fluorescent images of the cell constructs with PCL and PLPC porous microcarriers at 14 days after dynamic culture at 30 rpm. As expected, cell/PLPC constructs showed more vivid color than cell/PCL constructs, suggesting that PLPC porous microcarriers provided a better potential for cell expansion in the spinner flask culture than PCL porous microcarriers. SEM micrographs further support the cell expansion results and cell morphologies grown on the PCL and PLPC porous microcarriers at 30-rpm cultures on days 7 and 14 (Fig. 2d). Both porous microcarriers showed elongated but less-populated cells at day 7, with some cells found to migrate well into the pore structure. At day 14, cells numbered significantly to cover the surface and pores almost completely (no pores were revealed due to a thick cell layer formation). The cells on the PLPC compared to those on the PCL appeared to be much denser, forming more compacted cellular constructs.

Collectively, the PLPC provided conditions for better initial cell adhesion than the PCL, at both 30 and 50 rpm. With subsequent spinner flask culturing, the rotation at a lower speed improved the cell proliferation for up to 7 and 14 days, and this was general for the PLPC and PCL. The lower mechanical shear force at the lower rotation speed was considered to provide better conditions for cellular proliferation. A rotation speed of 30 rpm is relatively low compared to those reported in other studies, where the speeds more than 50–100 rpm have been applied to gain optimal cellular anchorage and proliferation (Bilgen and Barabino 2007; Tamura et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2013). It is considered that compared to the dense polymer microcarriers used in other studies, the currently used porous microcarriers, even when retaining relatively large size, have much lower density, which should enable easier floating even at a minimal rotation speed.

Cell differentiation

The differentiation ability of the dynamically cultured cells on both porous microcarriers were evaluated by a colorimetric ALP activity (Fig. 3a) and mRNA expression levels (Fig. 3b) on days 7 and 14. The ALP staining intensity on cell constructs with the PLPC at 14 days was the highest. As supported, bone-specific mRNA levels of ALP and Col I expressed by the cell constructs on the both microcarriers significantly increased at 14 days in comparison with those at 7 days. Notably, the mRNA levels of two bone-specific genes on cell constructs with the PLPC in 14-day cultures were significantly higher than those expressed on cell constructs with the PCL. The results confirmed that the cells cultured on the PCL and PLPC were properly induced to an osteogenic differentiation under the dynamic culture conditions.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Osteogenic activity of cells cultured on the microcarriers in the dynamic conditions (at 30 rpm) for up to 14 days. a Digital camera images of ALP activity showing violet-stained cells cultured on the microcarriers on day 7 and 14. Size bars 5 mm. b mRNA levels of bone-specific genes, including ALP and type I collagen, expressed by the cells on the microspheres, assayed by quantitative real-time PCR assessment. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01

Spinner flask cell culture using microcarriers have been employed for scalable expansion of stem cell (Eibes et al. 2010; Oh et al. 2009) or tissue regeneration including cartilage (Sommar et al. 2010; Lee et al. 2011), skin (Voigt et al. 1999), and adipose (Kang et al. 2008a). Specific for the bone repair, Kang et al. (2008b) reported apatite-coated poly(lactide-co-glycolic acid) microspheres as osteoblast carriers in spinner flasks. Similarly, Grellier et al. (2009) performed a stirring culture of osteoprogenitor and endothelial cells using alginate microbeads for bone defect healing. Compared to the previous work on dense microcarriers, the currently-developed porous microcarriers are considered to provide more space and surface area for the loading of cells and their subsequent delivery into in vivo bone defects. Based on the current in vitro results, including cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation, the porous polymeric microcarriers are considered as a promising platform for expanding cells under proper spinner flask cultures and generating cellular constructs for further bone tissue engineering. We next performed an in vivo test to find out the feasibility of the cell-microcarrier constructs.

In vivo findings

PCL and PLPC microcarriers constructed with cells for 7 days under the dynamic culture were tested. After the implantation in mice subcutaneously for 4 weeks, tissue samples were excised and histologically examined after H&E and MT staining (Fig. 4a and b, respectively). No significant inflammatory reaction was noticed on both sample groups, confirming good tissue compatibility. The periphery of the microcarriers was filled with tissues including connective tissues. The pore space of both microcarriers was occupied by existing or migrating tissue cells, and the presence of cells was more conspicuous on the PLPC than on the PCL porous microcarriers, resulting in the formation of a thicker tissue layer inside the PLPC than inside the PCL. These in vivo findings of excellent cellular penetration and connective tissue formation within the porous microcarriers support the feasibility of the cell-constructed microcarriers under the dynamic culture conditions for applications in bone tissue engineering, warranting further study.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Histological analyses of the cell-cultured microcarriers implanted in subcutaneous sites of C57BL/6 mice for 4 weeks. Bone tissue containing the microcarrier scaffolds was analyzed by a H&E and b MT staining. Right images are enlarged from each boxed area in left images

Conclusion

We report for the first time the dynamic seeding and culture of cells within porous polymeric microcarriers as a potential platform for bone tissue engineering. The highly porous structure of the microcarriers in conjunction with the properly-adjusted spinner flask cultures enabled uniform cellular loading at large quantity. Subsequent cultures over periods of weeks resulted in substantial cell expansion and osteogenic differentiation. The cell-microcarrier constructs exhibited good in vivo compatibility and tissue formation within the pore space, suggesting that the current system may be potentially applicable for future bone tissue engineering.