Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Agrawala, M., D. Zorin, and T. Munzner: 2000, ‘Artistic multiprojetion rendering’, Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 2000.
S. Baron-Cohen R. Campbell A. Karmiloff-Smith et al. (1995) ArticleTitle‘Are Children with Autism Blind to the Mentalistic Significance of Eyes?’ British Journal of Developmental Psychology 13 379–398
E. Burton (1997) ArticleTitle‘Artificial Innocence: Interactions Between the Study of Children’s Drawing and Artificial Intelligence’ Leonardo 30 IssueID4 301–309
B.A.R. Carter (1967) ArticleTitle‘The Use of Perspective in Saenredam’ Burlington Magazine 109 594–595
N. Chomsky (1957) Syntactic Structures Mouton The Hague
N. Chomsky (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax MIT Press MA: Cambridge
Cohen, H.: 1979, What is an Image? http://www.kurzweilcyberart.com/aaron/hi_essays.html.
H.: 1999, Colouring Without Seeing: a Problem in Machine Creativity, http://www.kurzweilcyberart.com/aaron/hi_essays.html.
F. Dubery J. Willats (1972) Drawing Systems Studio Vista; New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold London
Durand, F.: 2002, ‘An invitation to discuss computer depiction’, Proceedings of the Eurographics/SIGGRAPH Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering, June 2002.
J.J. Gibson (1971) ArticleTitle‘The Information Available in Pictures’ Leonardo 4 27–35
Gombrich, E.H.: 1960/1988, Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, Oxford: Phaidon Press.
Gooch and Gooch: 2001, Non-Photorealistic Rendering, A.K. Peters.
Grabli, S., F. Durand, E. Turquin, and F. Sillion: 2003, A procedural approach to Style for NPR line drawing from 3D models. INRIA Technical Report, 2003.
M.A. Hagen (1986) Varieties of Realism: Geometries of Representational Art Cambridge University Press Cambridge
D.A. Huffman (1971) ‘Impossible Objects as Nonsense Sentences’ B. Meltzer D. Mitchie (Eds) Machine Intelligence Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh 295–323
M. Kemp (1992) The Science of Art: Optical Themes in Western Art from Brunelleschi to Seurat Yale University Press New Haven, CO
J.M. Kennedy (1974) A Psychology of Picture Perception Jossey-Bass San Francisco
J.M. Kennedy (1983) ArticleTitle‘What Can we Learn about Pictures from the Blind’ American Scientist 71 19–26 Occurrence Handle6846933
Koenderink, J.J. and A.J. van Doorn 1982, ‘The Shape of Smooth Objects and the Way Contours End’, Perception 11, 129–137.
D. Marr (1982) Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information W.H. Freeman San Francisco
B.A. Moskowitz (1978) ArticleTitle‘The Acquisition of Language’ Scientific American 239 82–96
S.E. Palmer (1999) Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology MIT Press MA: Cambridge
D. Pearson E. Hanna K. Martinez (1990) Computer Generated Cartoons H. Barlow C. Blakemore M. Weston-Smith (Eds) Images and Understanding Cambridge University Press Cambridge 46–60
P. Rawson (1987) Drawing University of Pennsylvania Press Philadelphia
T. Strothotte S. Schlechtweg (2002) Non-Photorealistic Computer Graphics. Modeling, Rendering and Animation Morgan Kaufmann San Francisco
R.H. Thouless (1933) ArticleTitle‘A racial difference in perception’ Journal of Social Psychology 4 IssueID3 330–339
J.P. Thorne (1972) ‘Generative Grammar and Stylistic Analysis’ J. Lyons (Eds) New Horizons in Linguistics Harmondsworth Middlesex: Penguin 185–197
D. Waltz (1975) Understanding Line Drawings of Scenes with shadows P.H. Winston (Eds) The Psychology of Computer Vision McGraw- Hill New York 19–91
J. White (1967) The Birth and Rebirth of Pictorial Space Faber and Faber London
J. Willats (1985) Drawing Systems Revisited: The Role of Denotation Systems in Children’s Figure Drawings N.H. Freeman M.V. Cox (Eds) Visual Order: The Nature and Development of Pictorial Representation Cambridge University Press Cambridge 78–100
J. Willats (1992a) ArticleTitle‘Seeing Lumps, Sticks and Slabs in Silhouettes’ Perception 21 481–496
J. Willats (1992b) ArticleTitle‘The Representation of Extendedness in Children’s Drawings of Sticks and Discs’ Child Development 63 692–710
J. Willats (1997) Art and Representations: New Principles in the Analysis of Pictures Princeton University Press Princeton
J. Willats (2002a) The Rules of Representation P. Smith C. Wilde (Eds) A Companion to Art Theory Blackwell Oxford 411–425
J. Willats (2002b) ArticleTitle‘The Third Domain: The Role of Pictorial Images in Picture Perception and Production’ Axiomathes 13 IssueID1 1–15 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1016547621681
Willats, J. (in press), ‘Optical Laws or Symbolic Rules: The Dual Nature of Pictorial Systems’, In H. Hecht, B. Schwartz and M. Atherton (eds.), Reconceiving Pictorial Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
H. Wölfflin (1932) Principles of Art History G. Bell & Sons London
R. Wollheim (1977) Representation: The Philosophical Contribution to Psychology G. Butterworth (Eds) The Child’s Representation of the World Plenum Press New York 173–188
R. Wollheim (1987) Painting as an Art Thames and Hudson London
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Willats, J., Durand, F. Defining Pictorial Style: Lessons from Linguistics and Computer Graphics. Axiomathes 15, 319–351 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-004-5449-7
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-004-5449-7