Abstract
Toulmin’s scheme for the layout of arguments (1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) represents an influential tool for the analysis of arguments. The scheme enriches the traditional premises-conclusion model of arguments by distinguishing additional elements, like warrant, backing and rebuttal. The present paper contains a formal elaboration of Toulmin’s scheme, and extends it with a treatment of the formal evaluation of Toulmin-style arguments, which Toulmin did not discuss at all. Arguments are evaluated in terms of a so-called dialectical interpretation of their assumptions. In such an interpretation, an argument’s assumptions can be evaluated as defeated, e.g., when there is a defeating reason against the assumption. The present work builds on recent research on defeasible argumentation (cf. e.g. the work of Pollock, Reiter, Loui, Vreeswijk, Prakken, Hage and Dung). More specifically, the author’s work on the dialectical logic DEFLOG and the argumentation tool ARGUMED serve as starting points.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
J. L. Austin (1962) How to Do Things with Words Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
T. J. M. Bench-Capon (1997) ArticleTitle‘Argument in Artificial Intelligence and Law’ Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 249–261 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008242417011
C. I. Chesñevar A. G. Maguitman R. P. Loui (2000) ArticleTitle‘Logical Models of Argument’ ACM Computing Surveys 32 337–383 Occurrence Handle10.1145/371578.371581
P. M. Dung (1995) ArticleTitle‘On the Acceptability of Arguments and Its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games’ Artificial Intelligence 77 321–357 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X
R. H. Ennis (1982) ArticleTitle‘Identifying Implicit Assumptions’ Synthese 51 61–86 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00413849
D. M. Gabbay C. J. Hogger J. A. Robinson (Eds) (1994) Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming. Volume 3. Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Uncertain Reasoning Clarendon Press Oxford
R. Girle D. L. Hitchcock P. McBurney B. Verheij (2003) Decision Support for Practical Reasoning: A Theoretical and Computational Perspective C. Reed T. J. Norman (Eds) Argumentation Machines. New Frontiers in Argument and Computation Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht 55–84
S. Haack (1978) Philosophy of Logics Cambridge University Press Cambridge
J. C. Hage (1997) Reasoning with Rules. An Essay on Legal Reasoning and Its Underlying Logic Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht
J. C. Hage (2000) ArticleTitle‘Dialectical Models in Artificial Intelligence and Law’ Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 137–172
D. L. Hitchcock (1985) ArticleTitle‘Enthymematic Arguments’ Informal Logic 7 83–97
D. L. Hitchcock (1998) ArticleTitle‘Does the Traditional Treatment of Enthymemes Rest on a Mistake?’ Argumentation 12 15–37 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1007738519694
D. Hofstadter (1980) Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid Vintage Books New York
R. P. Loui (1998) ArticleTitle‘Process and Policy: Resource-Bounded Non-Demonstrative Reasoning’ Computational Intelligence 14 1–38 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0824-7935.00055
McBurney, P. and S. Parsons: 2000, ‘Tenacious Tortoises: A Formalism for Argument over Rules of Inference’, Computational Dialectics (ECAI 2000 Workshop), Berlin
J. L. Pollock (1987) ArticleTitle‘Defeasible Reasoning’ Cognitive Science 11 481–518 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0364-0213(87)80017-4
H. Prakken (1997) Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument. A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht
H. G. Prakken A. W. Vreeswijk (2002) ‘Logics for Defeasible Argumentation’ D. M. Gabbay F. Guenthner (Eds) Handbook of Philosophical Logic EditionNumber2 NumberInSeriesVol. 4 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht 218–319
C. Reed T. J. Norman (Eds) (2003) Argumentation Machines. New Frontiers in Argument and Computation Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht
R. Reiter (1980) ArticleTitle‘A Logic for Default Reasoning’ Artificial Intelligence 13 81–132 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0004-3702(80)90014-4
J. R. Searle (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language Cambridge University Press Cambridge
S. E. Toulmin (1958) The Uses of Argument Cambridge University Press Cambridge
S. E. Toulmin R. Rieke A. Janik (1984) An Introduction to Reasoning EditionNumber2 Macmillan New York
S. E. Toulmin (2001) Return to Reason Harvard University Press Cambridge MA
F. H. Eemeren Particlevan R. Grootendorst F. S. Henkemans (1996) Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah NJ
Verheij, B.: 1996, Rules, Reasons, Arguments. Formal Studies of Argumentation and Defeat, Dissertation Universiteit, Maastricht
B. Verheij (1999) Logic, Context and Valid Inference. Or: Can There Be a Logic of Law? H. J. Herik Particlevan den M.-F. Moens J. Bing B. Buggenhout Particlevan J. Zeleznikow C. A. F. M. Grütters (Eds) Legal Knowledge Based Systems. JURIX 1999: The Twelfth Conference Gerard Noodt Instituut Nijmegen 109–121
B. Verheij (2002) Evaluating Arguments based on Toulmins Scheme H. V. Hansen C. W. Tindale J. A. Blair R. H. Johnson R. C. Pinto (Eds) Argumentation and Its Applications Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Windsor, ON
B. Verheij (2003a) ArticleTitle‘Artificial Argument Assistants for Defeasible Argumentation’ Artificial Intelligence 150 291–324 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00107-3
B. Verheij (2003b) ArticleTitle‘DefLog: On the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions’ Journal of Logic and Computation 13 319–346 Occurrence Handle10.1093/logcom/13.3.319
B. Verheij (2003c) ArticleTitle‘Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal Logic’ Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 167–195
B. Verheij (2005) Virtual Arguments. On the Design of Argument Assistants for Lawyers and Other Arguers T. M. C. Asser Press The Hague
G. A. W. Vreeswijk (1997) ArticleTitle‘Abstract Argumentation Systems’ Artificial Intelligence 90 225–279 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0004-3702(96)00041-0
D. N. Walton (1996) Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, NJ
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verheij, B. Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme. Argumentation 19, 347–371 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-4421-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-4421-z