Abstract
Background
Radical esophagectomy remains the primary treatment option for resectable esophageal cancer. However, it sometimes induces postoperative complications due to its invasive nature. Recently, the impact of loss of muscle mass on postoperative complications and survival among cancer patients has been highlighted. This study aimed to identify the impact of low hand grip strength (HGS) on postoperative complications after esophagectomy.
Methods
A total of 188 patients (male: 166, female: 22) who underwent radical esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction between 2008 and 2014 were included. The correlation between HGS and age was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Due to the small patient numbers, only male patients were stratified into two groups according to age (<70 years: non-elderly group, ≥70 years: elderly group). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed for each group using postoperative complication occurrence as the endpoint to determine an optimal HGS cutoff value.
Results
Postoperative complications occurred in 60.9% of the elderly group and 47.4% of the non-elderly group. When the cutoff values were set at 30.5 and 37 kg for the elderly and non-elderly group, respectively, low HGS was an independent predictive factor of postoperative complications on multivariate analysis only in the elderly group (p = 0.008). In the elderly group, the incidence of postoperative pneumonia was 39.5% among patients with low HGS vs. 3.8% among patients with high HGS.
Conclusion
Preoperative HGS is an independent predictive factor of postoperative complications, especially postoperative pneumonia, for elderly male patients with esophageal cancer treated with radical esophagectomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Esophageal cancer is the ninth most common cancer worldwide, with 442,000 new cases annually, and the sixth most common cause of cancer death, with 440,000 deaths in 2013 [1]. Although advances in multimodality therapy, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, have improved survival, the prognosis remains poor [2]. Esophagectomy remains a mainstay treatment for potentially curable esophageal cancer [3, 4]. Due to extensive nodal involvement, extended radical esophagectomy with two- or three-field lymph node dissection is performed in Japan [5]. This highly invasive procedure is associated with severe postoperative complications, such as pneumonia, anastomotic leakage, and recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis. Therefore, preoperative evaluation to predict postoperative complications and prognostic outcome is important.
Sarcopenia is defined as the age-related loss of muscle mass, muscle strength, and performance [6]. Cancer patients often have age-related sarcopenia (primary sarcopenia) plus disease-related and nutrition-related sarcopenia (secondary sarcopenia). Sarcopenia arising from comorbidities also often occurs in elderly cancer patients [7].
Low muscle strength is one criterion to define sarcopenia. The European Working Group for Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) proposed that sarcopenia be diagnosed using the criteria of loss of muscle mass with either muscle weakness or poor physical performance. Concerning muscle strength, hand grip strength (HGS) is widely used [8]. Low HGS alone is reportedly a predictor of postoperative complications [9, 10], worse outcomes [11, 12], and longer hospital stay [13] in patients with cancer. However, there have been only a few studies evaluating the impact of preoperative HGS on morbidity following esophagectomy [12, 14]. This study aimed to investigate the impact of low HGS on postoperative complications.
Materials and methods
Patients and data collection
We performed a retrospective analysis of 337 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent radical esophagectomy with thoracotomy or thoracoscopy from January 2007 to December 2014 at Shizuoka General Hospital. HGS was measured within 30 days before surgery in 207 patients (61.4%). Patients with simultaneous other advanced cancers (n = 3), treated with esophagectomy and laryngopharyngectomy (n = 5), treated with pull-through esophagectomy (n = 3), and those treated with colonic interposition after esophagectomy (n = 8) were excluded. Thus, 188 patients were eligible for this study. Patients’ background information, laboratory data including predicted vital capacity (VC) and predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1.0), clinical stage (TMN classification 7th edition) [15], treatment information, and prognosis were obtained from medical records. Postoperative complications were classified according to the Clavien–Dindo classification [16] with complications being defined as Grade II or above. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Shizuoka General Hospital (SGHIRB#2016014). Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective nature.
Hand grip strength measurement
HGS was measured in kilograms (kg) by a digital handgrip dynamometer (T.K.K.5401, Takei Scientific Instruments Co. LTD, Niigata, Japan) in the dominant and non-dominant hands within 30 days preoperatively. Patients performed the measurements while standing comfortably with forearm, wrist, and elbow in neutral position. Patients were asked to maintain maximum grip strength and measurements were repeated three times. The average of maximum measured values of the dominant and non-dominant hands was registered.
Statistical analysis
Fisher’s exact test, Chi-squared test, and Mann–Whitney U test were used to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients. The correlation between HGS and age was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted and analyzed to predict the incidence of postoperative complications. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between various predictors and postoperative complications. Factors on univariate analysis showing values of p < 0.25 were entered into multivariate logistic regression analyses. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA), with p values <0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results
Patient characteristics
Median age was 67 years (range 40–89 years), and all patients had undergone esophagectomy for curative intent with reconstruction by gastric tube. Histological tumor types were squamous cell carcinoma (90.4%, 170 of 188), adenocarcinoma (5.3%, 10 of 188), basaloid carcinoma (1.8%, 3 of 188), spindle cell carcinoma (1.1%, 2 of 188), malignant melanoma (1.1%, 2 of 188), and mucoepidermoid carcinoma (0.5%, 1 of 188). Median HGS of male patients was 32.1 kg (range 20–51.6 kg) and median HGS of female patients was 23.6 kg (range 17.9–31.9 kg). Median follow-up period was 30.75 months (range 0.23–110 months).
Correlation between HGS and age
The correlation between HGS and age was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. HGS showed a significant inverse association with age in both males and females (Pearson’s correlation coefficient, male: −0.492, p < 0.001; female: −0.539, p = 0.01) (Fig. 1a, b). We stratified all male patients according to age (<70 years, ≥70 years) and then assessed if HGS could be a predictor of postoperative complications. We excluded female patients for further investigation because the number (n = 22) was too small to assess the impact of low HGS.
Evaluation of the HGS cutoff value
ROC analysis was performed to define the cutoff value to determine whether HGS could predict postoperative complications. The ROC curves identified an optimal HGS cutoff value of 30.5 kg predicting postoperative complications in the elderly group (≥70 years) [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.69, p = 0.009], and 37 kg in the non-elderly group (<70 years) (AUC = 0.585, p = 0.162) (Fig. 2a, b). We divided the patients into two categories (high-HGS patients and low-HGS patients) based on the HGS cutoff value of 30.5 kg for the elderly group and 37 kg for the non-elderly group. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the high- and low-HGS patients in the two groups. The low-HGS patients in the elderly group were significantly older and had lower body mass index. In the non-elderly group, the low-HGS patients were also significantly older. Moreover, the proportion of patients with more advanced cancer stage at the time of diagnosis was significantly higher among low-HGS patients (p = 0.043).
HGS and postoperative complications
Potential predictive factors for postoperative complication were evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses in both groups (Table 2). In the multivariate analyses, low HGS was an independent predictive factor of postoperative complications in the elderly group (odds ratio = 4.893, 95% confidence interval 1.528–15.671, p = 0.008), but not in the non-elderly group (p = 0.198). There was no independent predictive factor for postoperative complications on multivariate analysis in the non-elderly group, while a borderline significant trend (p = 0.053) was observed for longer operation time (≥7 h). We compared the incidence of postoperative complications between the low-HGS and high-HGS patients using Fisher’s exact test in both groups (Table 3). In the elderly group, the incidence of pneumonia was significantly higher among low-HGS patients compared to high-HGS patients (p = 0.001), and the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis tended to be higher in low-HGS patients. On the other hand, complications did not differ significantly between low- and high-HGS patients in the non-elderly group.
HGS and short-term surgical outcome
The median length of hospital stay tended to be longer in patients with low HGS than patients with high HGS both in the elderly group (33 vs. 23.5 days, p = 0.087) and the non-elderly group (23 vs. 20 days, p = 0.100). Hospital mortality occurred in four patients (2.4%), and all of them were patients with low HGS in the elderly group (Table 3).
Discussion
In this study, low HGS was associated with postoperative complications, especially pneumonia, after radical esophagectomy among male elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Sarcopenia is associated with postoperative complications [14, 17,18,19,20] and long-term outcomes [17, 21,22,23] in several cancers. However, sarcopenia was diagnosed based on the depletion of skeletal mass alone in many studies. Makiura et al. reported that sarcopenia and high Brinkman index were independent risk factors for the development of pulmonary complications in esophageal cancer following esophagectomy. In this study, sarcopenia was defined as low muscle mass plus low muscle strength and/or low physical performance [14]. These definitions and practical criteria for the diagnosis of sarcopenia were proposed by EWGSOP in 2010 [8]. Loss of skeletal muscle mass is an essential and important criterion for the diagnosis of sarcopenia. Body imaging techniques [e.g., computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)] or bioelectrical impedance analysis is used to estimate muscle mass. Esophageal cancer patients usually undergo computed tomography to confirm cancer staging, and this technique can be used to estimate muscle mass. However, these methods are not easily used for routine investigation because of limited access to software and complexity of measurement.
Some reports indicate that muscle mass has a positive correlation with HGS [24, 25]. Lee et al. reported that HGS was associated with skeletal muscle index in elderly Chinese people [24]. Maximum HGS was also reported to correlate with total skeletal muscle mass measured using DXA [25], suggesting that HGS could be a surrogate marker of muscle mass. HGS offers the benefits of being relatively simple and inexpensive to be performed at any institution. EWGSOP suggested using <30 kg for males and <20 kg for females as the cutoff values for low HGS to diagnose sarcopenia [8]; however, the cutoff value should be modified based on race, age, and purpose of the study. Wu et al. reported a difference between Caucasians and Taiwan Chinese grip strength [26] and the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia recommends different cutoff values from EWGSOP for hand grip strength (<26 kg for males and <18 kg for females) [27]. Furthermore, it has been reported that reference values of HGS in healthy populations decline with aging both in Japan and other countries [28,29,30]. Our data showed that there is a significant inverse association between age and HGS in patients with esophageal cancer. In several reports on the correlation between HGS and postoperative complications including young patients, gender-specific single cutoff values of HGS were determined without distinction by age [9, 10, 12]. However, in general, young patients represent a certain proportion of patients with cancer. Therefore, it would be appropriate to determine stratified cutoff values according to age, as we did, rather than a single cutoff value, as is used to diagnose sarcopenia for elderly people. Webb et al. reported that age-standardized grip strengths can predict postoperative complications [31]. Although we determined stratified cutoff values according to age, cutoff value of HGS in the non-elderly group had low accuracy and low predictive value (AUC = 0.58, p = 0.162), and low HGS was not an independent predictive factor of postoperative complications on multivariate analysis in the non-elderly group. There was an important difference in patient characteristics between the elderly and the non-elderly groups. The non-elderly group with low HGS included considerably more patients with advanced tumor stage, and it seems that HGS strongly reflected cancer-related and/or nutrition-related sarcopenia in the non-elderly group. On the other hand, there was no difference in tumor stage at diagnosis between low- and high-HGS patients in the elderly group, and it seems that HGS more strongly reflected age-related sarcopenia in the elderly group. This could in part explain the high predictive value of HGS for postoperative complications obtained only in the elderly group. Thus, HGS might be an effective measurement only for elderly patients with esophageal cancer.
Chen et al. reported age-standardized grip strength to be an adequate indicator of mortality in patients from 51 to 70 years of age after esophagectomy [12]. We found hospital mortality only in elderly patients with low HGS, indicating that HGS might be useful to predict short-term mortality.
There are various definitions of elderly people. Many countries accept the age of 65 years and older as a definition of elderly. However, currently, many Japanese people older than 65 years remain active. It is reported that healthy life expectancy, which is calculated by subtracting the time expected to suffer from an illness from the predicted average life expectancy, at birth in 2015 was 71.54 for men in Japan [32]. Therefore, in Japan, there is debate as to whether the elderly definition should be raised above 70 years old or over 75 years old. Based on these facts, we defined people over the age of 70 as elderly in this study.
Further investigation to further reduce postoperative complications when performing radical esophagectomy for sarcopenic patients is warranted. Yamamoto et al. reported the effect of a preoperative exercise and nutritional support program for sarcopenic patients with gastric cancer aged 65 years or older. Twenty-two sarcopenic patients received a preoperative program for a median of 16 days. After the program, HGS significantly increased, and postoperative severe complications of Clavien–Dindo classification Grade III or higher were not observed [33]. Further similar research will clarify appropriate timing and regimens of intervention to reduce postoperative complications and improve outcomes after esophagectomy.
Our study has some limitations. This was a retrospective study at a single institution. HGS was measured in only 61.4% of patients before radical esophagectomy, and females were excluded due to the small patient numbers. Protocols for measuring HGS (e.g., posture, number of measurement, arm side, and handle position) differ among previous studies, though HGS is a well-established indicator of muscle status. It might be necessary to evaluate whether our protocol is appropriate, and consensus is needed concerning the measuring protocol of HGS. In the present study, patients were divided into two groups based on age. Both in the elderly and non-elderly groups, the low-HGS patients were significantly older. It would be better to set cutoff values stratified finely by age groups to minimize the influence of age. However, because the number of patients was small in the current analysis, we could not divide patients into more detailed age groups. Finally, no data were available regarding physical performance and nutritional intake.
Preoperative risk assessment is increasingly important with aging of the Japanese population. Further study is required to develop simple and useful preoperative risk assessment methods for patients with esophageal cancer.
Conclusion
Preoperative HGS has the potential to predict postoperative complications, especially pneumonia, for elderly male patients with esophageal cancer after radical esophagectomy. We should recognize the possibility of postoperative pneumonia in elderly patients with low HGS, and provide careful postoperative management.
References
Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration. The global burden of cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(4):505–27.
Alsop BR, Sharma P. Esophageal cancer. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2016;45(3):399–412.
Markar SR, Low DE. Physiology, not chronology, dictates outcomes after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: outcomes in patients 80 years and older. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(3):1020–6.
Pultrum BB, Bosch DJ, Nijsten MW, et al. Extended esophagectomy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer: minor effect of age alone in determining the postoperative course and survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(6):1572–80.
Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, et al. Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg. 1994;220(3):364–72 (discussion 372–373).
Fielding RA, Vellas B, Evans WJ, et al. Sarcopenia: an undiagnosed condition in older adults. Current consensus definition: prevalence, etiology, and consequences. International Working Group on Sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011;12(4):249–56.
Stepney R. Supportive care vital in elderly cancer patients: a report from the 2015 annual conference of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG), which focused on the role of supportive care in geriatric oncology. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(6):2397–401.
Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010;39(4):412–23.
Guo CB, Zhang W, Ma DQ, et al. Hand grip strength: an indicator of nutritional state and the mix of postoperative complications in patients with oral and maxillofacial cancers. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;34(4):325–7.
Sato T, Aoyama T, Hayashi T, et al. Impact of preoperative hand grip strength on morbidity following gastric cancer surgery. Gastric Cancer. 2016;19(3):1008–15.
Kilgour RD, Vigano A, Trutschnigg B, et al. Handgrip strength predicts survival and is associated with markers of clinical and functional outcomes in advanced cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(12):3261–70.
Chen CH, Ho-Chang, Huang YZ, et al. Hand-grip strength is a simple and effective outcome predictor in esophageal cancer following esophagectomy with reconstruction: a prospective study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;6:98.
Mendes J, Alves P, Amaral TF. Comparison of nutritional status assessment parameters in predicting length of hospital stay in cancer patients. Clin Nutr. 2014;33(3):466–70.
Makiura D, Ono R, Inoue J, et al. Preoperative sarcopenia is a predictor of postoperative pulmonary complications in esophageal cancer following esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study. J Geriatr Oncol. 2016;7(6):430–6.
Sobin L, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 7th ed. New York: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.
Zhuang CL, Huang DD, Pang WY, et al. Sarcopenia is an independent predictor of severe postoperative complications and long-term survival after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: analysis from a large-scale cohort. Medicine. 2016;95(13):e3164.
Valero V 3rd, Amini N, Spolverato G, et al. Sarcopenia adversely impacts postoperative complications following resection or transplantation in patients with primary liver tumors. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(2):272–81.
Otsuji H, Yokoyama Y, Ebata T, et al. Preoperative sarcopenia negatively impacts postoperative outcomes following major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection. World J Surg. 2015;39(6):1494–500.
Ida S, Watanabe M, Yoshida N, et al. Sarcopenia is a predictor of postoperative respiratory complications in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(13):4432–7.
Sabel MS, Lee J, Cai S, et al. Sarcopenia as a prognostic factor among patients with stage III melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(13):3579–85.
Harimoto N, Shirabe K, Yamashita YI, et al. Sarcopenia as a predictor of prognosis in patients following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2013;100(11):1523–30.
Miyamoto Y, Baba Y, Sakamoto Y, et al. Sarcopenia is a negative prognostic factor after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(8):2663–8.
Lee JS, Auyeung TW, Kwok T, et al. Associated factors and health impact of sarcopenia in older chinese men and women: a cross-sectional study. Gerontology. 2007;53(6):404–10.
Visser M, Harris TB, Langlois J, et al. Body fat and skeletal muscle mass in relation to physical disability in very old men and women of the Framingham Heart Study. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998;53(3):M214–21.
Wu SW, Wu SF, Liang HW, et al. Measuring factors affecting grip strength in a Taiwan Chinese population and a comparison with consolidated norms. Appl Ergon. 2009;40(4):811–5.
Chen LK, Liu LK, Woo J, et al. Sarcopenia in Asia: consensus report of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(2):95–101.
Kamide N, Kamiya R, Nakazono T, et al. Reference values for hand grip strength in Japanese community-dwelling elderly: a meta-analysis. Environ Health Prev Med. 2015;20(6):441–6.
Seino S, Shinkai S, Fujiwara Y, et al. Reference values and age and sex differences in physical performance measures for community-dwelling older Japanese: a pooled analysis of six cohort studies. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99487.
Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, et al. Reference ranges of handgrip strength from 125,462 healthy adults in 21 countries: a prospective urban rural epidemiologic (PURE) study. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016;7(5):535–46.
Webb AR, Newman LA, Taylor M, et al. Hand grip dynamometry as a predictor of postoperative complications reappraisal using age standardized grip strengths. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1989;13(1):30–3.
GBD 2015 DALYs and HALE Collaborators. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 315 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE), 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1603–58.
Yamamoto K, Nagatsuma Y, Fukuda Y, et al. Effectiveness of a preoperative exercise and nutritional support program for elderly sarcopenic patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2016;. doi:10.1007/s10120-016-0683-4.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for medical research from Shizuoka Prefectural Hospital Organization.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Statement
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.
Conflict of interest
All authors have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sato, S., Nagai, E., Taki, Y. et al. Hand grip strength as a predictor of postoperative complications in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy. Esophagus 15, 10–18 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-017-0587-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-017-0587-3