Skip to main content
Log in

Outcomes for Abdominoperineal Resections Are Not Worse Than Those of Anterior Resections

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Purpose

Local recurrence and cure rates following abdominoperineal resections have been reported to be much worse than sphincter-preserving anterior resections. We compared the oncologic outcomes of patients treated by abdominoperineal resections with those following sphincter-preserving anterior resections.

Methods

The medical records of patients who underwent radical rectal resection for rectal carcinoma at the Colorectal Surgery Department, Singapore General Hospital, during the period from April 1989 to April 2002 were reviewed. A total of 791 cases were studied. Operative procedures were classified as either abdominoperineal resections or anterior resections with either straight or pouch anastomosis. Total mesorectal excision was routinely performed for carcinomas of the lower middle and lower third of the rectum. Sentinel events, including local and systemic recurrences or morbidity and mortality, were tracked prospectively.

Results

There were a total of 93 abdominoperineal resections (12.1 percent), 547 anterior resections with straight anastomoses (71 percent), and 130 anterior resections with pouch anastomoses (16.9 percent). Postoperative mortality was 2.6 percent and postoperative morbidity was 13.6 percent with an overall anastomotic leakage rate of 2.5 percent. The cumulative five-year local recurrence rate was 5.4 percent for abdominoperineal resections, 3.6 percent for anterior resections with straight anastomoses, and 3.8 percent for anterior resections with pouch anastomoses (P = 0.73 by log-rank test). The median time to local recurrence also did not differ significantly between the different procedures (abdominoperineal resections, 17 months, anterior resections with straight anastomoses, 18 months, anterior resections with pouch anastomoses, 13 months). Independent predictors for local recurrence included advanced tumor stage, tumor depth, and poorly differentiated tumors. The five-year cancer-specific survival was 70 percent. The type of anastomosis did not influence disease-free survival with median disease-free survival for patients who underwent abdominoperineal resections being 100 months, survival of anterior resections with straight anastomoses being 135 months, and survival of anterior resections with pouch anastomoses being 121 months (P = 0.33 by log-rank test). The independent factors for poor survival were age greater than 65 years, advanced tumor stage, tumor depth, and poorly differentiated tumors.

Conclusion

Both abdominoperineal resections and sphincter-preserving anterior resections can be performed safely with low morbidity and mortality in a specialized high-volume hospital unit without compromising oncologic outcomes. With appreciation of the anatomic relations in total mesorectal excision and standardized consistent surgical technique, the oncologic outcomes of patients treated by abdominoperineal resections are not worse than those treated by sphincter-preserving anterior resections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. RJ Heald RK Smedh A Kald R Sexton BJ Moran (1997) ArticleTitleAbdominoperineal excision of the rectum—an endangered operation Dis Colon Rectum 40 747–751 Occurrence Handle9221846 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02055425 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA28vovFM%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. F Seow-Choen (2002) ArticleTitleAdjuvant therapy for rectal cancer cannot be based on the results of other surgeons Br J Surg 89 946–947 Occurrence Handle12153617 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02139.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vgsVeisw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. WE Miles (1908) ArticleTitleA method of performing abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon Lancet ii 1812–1813

    Google Scholar 

  4. RJ Heald BJ Moran RD Ryall R Sexton JK MacFarlane (1998) ArticleTitleRectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978–1997 Arch Surg 133 894–899 Occurrence Handle9711965 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cznsFOrsQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. WE Enker HT Thaler ML Cranor T Polyak (1995) ArticleTitleTotal mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum J Am Coll Surg 181 335–346 Occurrence Handle7551328 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD3cfkslU%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. RJ Aitken (1996) ArticleTitleMesorectal excision for rectal cancer Br J Surg 83 214–216 Occurrence Handle8689166 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1996.02057.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB2cnps1w%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. RB Arenas A Fichera D Mhoon F Michelassi (1998) ArticleTitleTotal mesenteric excision in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer: a prospective study Arch Surg 133 608–611 Occurrence Handle9637458 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3pvFGksw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. A Bolognese M Cardi IA Muttillo A Barbarosos T Bocchetti S Valabrega (2000) ArticleTitleTotal mesorectal excision for surgical treatment of rectal cancer J Surg Oncol 74 21–23 Occurrence Handle10861603 Occurrence Handle10.1002/1096-9098(200005)74:1<21::AID-JSO5>3.0.CO;2-6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czitFCksg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. F Seow-Choen (1993) ArticleTitleColonic pouch after low anterior resection of the distal third of the rectum Ann Acad Med 22 229–232 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyA2s%2FpvFY%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. A Wibe A Syse E Andersen et al. (2004) ArticleTitleOncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection Dis Colon Rectum 47 48–58 Occurrence Handle14719151 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-003-0012-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. WL Law KW Chu (2004) ArticleTitleAbdominoperineal resection is associated with poor oncological outcome Br J Surg 91 1493–1499 Occurrence Handle15455362 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4723 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crksVyjsA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. S Zaheer JH Pemberton R Farouk RR Dozois BG Wolff D Ilstrup (1998) ArticleTitleSurgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum Ann Surg 227 800–811 Occurrence Handle9637543 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199806000-00003 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3pvFKmtA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. WE Enker N Merchant AM Cohen et al. (1999) ArticleTitleSafety and efficacy of low anterior resection for rectal cancer: 681 consecutive cases from a specialty service Ann Surg 230 544–552 Occurrence Handle10522724 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199910000-00010 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvltVGmuw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. DA Rothenberger WD Wong (1992) ArticleTitleAbdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the low rectum World J Surg 16 478–485 Occurrence Handle1589984 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02104451 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B2s7ltlU%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. RJ Heald EM Husband RD Ryall (1982) ArticleTitleThe mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery: the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69 613–616 Occurrence Handle6751457 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiyD38zpsVU%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Koh PK, Seow-Choen F, Kwek BH. Total mesorectal excision: the unrecognized pelvic plane. Dis Colon Rectum (in press)

  17. ID Nagtegaal CJ Velde Particlevan de E Worp Particlevan der et al. (2002) ArticleTitleMacroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control J Clin Oncol 20 1729–1734 Occurrence Handle11919228 Occurrence Handle10.1200/JCO.2002.07.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank medical students Chong Choon Seng and Wee Yeow Sherng for help with the data entry, Stephanie Chong for help with the statistical evaluation, and Carol Looi of the Department of Polyposis Registry for retrieval of data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis Seow-Choen M.B.B.S. (Singapore), F.R.C.S. (Edinb.).

Additional information

Reprints are not available.

About this article

Cite this article

Chuwa, E.W.L., Seow-Choen, F. Outcomes for Abdominoperineal Resections Are Not Worse Than Those of Anterior Resections. Dis Colon Rectum 49, 41–49 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0227-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0227-1

Key words

Navigation