Abstract
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to test the efficacy of an extreme policy of sphincter conservation by combining precise total mesorectal excision with low stapling techniques and endoluminal lavage to guard against implantation. METHODS: A total of 136 consecutive operations for cancer below 5 cm from the anal verge has been prospectively documented and followed for a mean of 7.7 (range, 1–18) years. A total of 105 of the operations were anterior resections (77 percent), and 31 were abdominoperineal excisions (23 percent). RESULTS: The oncologic results in the 105 patients who underwent anterior resections appear greatly superior to those of the patients who underwent abdominoperineal excisions, although the number of abdominoperineal excisions was small (31). Actuarial local recurrence at six years for anterior resection and total mesorectal excision was 1 percent for 85 curative procedures and 4 percent for all cases (n=100), compared with 33 and 47 percent for abdominoperineal excisions (n=15 and 31). Only four recurrences were observed below the level of the levators, three in the wound of an abdominoperineal excision and one in a stapled anastomosis after a palliative excision. No cases of nodal metastasis in the ischiorectal fossa were observed. CONCLUSION: In a unit specializing in sphincter conservation, precise total mesorectal excision from above appears oncologically superior to abdominoperineal excision. Three-fourths of patients with carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum can be offered sphincter-conserving surgery, although temporary defunctioning is probably prudent in such cases. The wound of an abdominoperineal excision may be a prerequisite for perineal recurrence, which may often be caused by implantation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Murray JJ, Veidenheimer MC. Abdomino-perineal excision of the rectum. In: Fielding LP, Goldberg SM, eds. Rob & Smith's operative surgery: surgery of the colon, rectum and anus. 5th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993:472–87.
Miles E. Cancer of the rectum. The Lettsomian Lectures. London: Harrison & Sons, 1923.
Lloyd Davies OV. Lithotomy-Trendelenburg position for resection of rectum and lower pelvic colon. Lancet 1939;2:74.
MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1993;341:457–60.
Moran BJ. Stapling instruments for intestinal anastomosis in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 1996;83:902–9.
Karanjia ND, Schache DJ, North WR, Heald RJ. ’Close Shave’ in anterior resection. Br J Surg 1990;77:510–2.
Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1986;1:1479–82.
Heald RJ, Leicester RJ. The low stapled anastomosis. Br J Surg 1981;68:333–7.
Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Holdsworth PJ, Heald RJ. Risk of peritonitis and fatal septicaemia and the need to defunction the low anastomosis. Br J Surg 1991;78:196–8.
Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Beam P, Heald RJ. Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1994;81:1224–6.
Enker WE. Designing the optimal surgery for rectal carcinoma. Cancer 1996;78:1847–50.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by the Wessex Cancer Trust and United States Surgical Corporation, Norwalk, Connecticut.
Norman Nigro Research Lectureship at the meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996.
About this article
Cite this article
Heald, R.J., Chir., M., Smedh, R.K. et al. Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum—An endangered operation. Dis Colon Rectum 40, 747–751 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055425
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055425