Abstract
Background
Anal endosonography (AES) has become an essential part of the pre-operative diagnostic workup in both organic and functional anal diseases.
Methods
Nine Italian centres with an average volume activity of >10 exams/week each were surveyed with the aim of determining the concordance with respect to indications for the procedure and interpretation of the results.
Results
Overall, anal sepsis, faecal incontinence and anorectal tumours were the more common indications for AES while evacuation dysfunctions and anal pain were not always considered indications. All centres use the same diagnostic criteria for simple and complicated perirectal sepsis and sphincteric defects, but adopt different classifications for stage 1 and stage 2 anal tumours. Participants agreed in that lymph-node staging by AES is less precise than tumour staging, especially after chemoradiation therapy.
Conclusions
A list of recommendations and guidelines based on the groups’s experience has been produced for those radiologists and coloproctologists interested in the use of AES and accreditation of their centres.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
*N. Tricomi (Participants)
**V. Piloni (Chairman)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dal Corso, H.M., D'Elia, A., De Nardi, P. et al. Anal endosonography: a survey of equipment, technique and diagnostic criteria adopted in nine Italian centers. Tech Coloproctol 11, 26–33 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-007-0321-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-007-0321-6