Abstract
Resident natural enemies can impact invasive species by causing Allee effects, leading to a reduction in establishment success of small founder populations, or by regulating or merely suppressing the abundance of established populations. Epiphyas postvittana, the Light Brown Apple Moth, an invasive leafroller in California, has been found to be attacked by a large assemblage of resident parasitoids that cause relatively high rates of parasitism. Over a 4-year period, we measured the abundance and per capita growth rates of four E. postvittana populations in California and determined parasitism rates. We found that at two of the sites, parasitism caused a component Allee effect, a reduction in individual survivorship at lower E. postvittana population densities, although it did not translate into a demographic Allee effect, an impact on per capita population growth rates at low densities. Instead, E. postvittana populations at all four sites exhibited strong compensatory density feedback throughout the entire range of densities observed at each site. As we found no evidence for a negative relationship between per capita population growth rates and parasitism rates, we concluded that resident parasitoids were unable to regulate E. postvittana populations in California. Despite a lack of evidence for regulation or a demographic Allee effect, the impact of resident parasitoids on E. postvittana populations is substantial and demonstrates significant biotic resistance against this new invader.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
With the increase of globalization, the introduction of exotic species into new regions has become a worldwide threat to biodiversity, ecosystem function and agricultural production (Mack et al. 2000; Ricciardi 2007). Although the majority of introduced exotic species remain low in abundance and ecological or economic significance (Ricciardi and Cohen 2007), some become invasive in the introduced region, exhibiting numerical dominance and a rapid rate of spread (Levine et al. 2004; Pyšek and Richardson 2006). Numerous factors can influence the success of invasion, including propagule pressure, abiotic conditions, biotic traits of exotic species, and composition and structure of resident communities (Catford et al. 2009; Davis 2009; Simberloff 2009). The role of the resident community in slowing down or preventing invasions forms the basis of the biotic resistance hypothesis, which suggests that predation from or competition with members of the recipient community can reduce the success of invasion (Elton 1958; Maron and Vilà 2001; Carlsson et al. 2011; Dumont et al. 2011).
Biotic resistance has been particularly well studied in the context of herbivory by vertebrates and insects on invasive plants (Colautti et al. 2004; Levine et al. 2004; Liu and Stiling 2006; reviewed by Maron and Vilà 2001), and predation in aquatic and marine environments (Torchin et al. 2003; Carlsson et al. 2011; Dumont et al. 2011). In contrast, there have been few studies on invasive herbivores and their natural enemies. Moreover, biotic resistance is commonly inferred from measurements of natural enemy richness and impact, i.e., numbers of natural enemy species and the mortality or damage they inflict on invasive populations (e.g., Mitchell and Power 2003; Torchin et al. 2003; Carlsson et al. 2011; reviewed by Levine et al. 2004). Yet, a higher richness of natural enemies does not necessarily translate to greater impact, and the net effect of mortality on population growth rates can vary significantly depending on the life history strategy of the invader (Maron and Vilà 2001) and how mortality at a particular life stage influences population growth (McEvoy and Coombs 1999; Mills 2005; Raghu et al. 2006). Studies of natural enemy impacts on invaders need a greater focus on population-level effects rather than individual responses (Halpern and Underwood 2006), and only recently have matrix population models been used to integrate individual responses into population growth rates (Schutzenhofer et al. 2009). These population level studies provide the most unequivocal evidence for or against the biotic resistance hypothesis. However, such detailed or long-term studies are scarce and thus enemy resistance remains a controversial hypothesis with short-term observational and experimental studies that both support and refute the importance of predation as a biotic interaction that influences the success of invasion.
A necessary but not sufficient condition for natural enemies to be able to play a decisive role in regulating the population growth rate of an invasive species is that they must induce compensatory density feedback (Herrando-Pérez et al. 2012a), such that there is a decrease in the per capita growth rate of the host with increasing population size (Hassell 2000; Seitz et al. 2001; Murdoch et al. 2003). In contrast, if small invasive populations suffer higher proportional mortality from natural enemies than larger populations, this can generate depensatory density feedback (Herrando-Pérez et al. 2012a) in which case the top-down effect is destabilizing rather than regulating and is known as an Allee effect (Allee 1931; Liebhold and Bascompte 2003; Courchamp et al. 2008; Kramer et al. 2009). Interest in Allee effects has surged in the last decade as a key aspect of invasion biology that can potentially limit the establishment or facilitate the eradication of new exotic species (Taylor and Hastings 2005; Tobin et al. 2011). Allee effects can either be measured as reductions in individual fitness parameters, such as survival or mate finding, at lower densities (component Allee effects), or as reductions in per capita population growth rates at lower densities (demographic or ensemble Allee effects (Herrando-Pérez et al. 2012b), integrating the effects of all component feedbacks (compensatory and depensatory) on demographic rates (Herrando-Pérez et al. 2012b). In theory, demographic Allee effects have the potential to limit the establishment success of invaders (Drake and Lodge 2006) or to reduce the risk and rate of spread of invaders (Lewis and Kareiva 1993). In the absence of compensatory or depensatory density feedback, however, natural enemy-induced mortality can still play an important role in the dynamics of invasive species by suppressing their abundance below the carrying capacity for the environment (Rohde 2006; Schmickl and Karsai 2010).
In the present study, over a 4 year period, we monitored the population densities and parasitism rates of Light Brown Apple Moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), as an invasive species in California. Epiphyas postvittana is a tortricid leafroller native to South Eastern Australia that was first discovered in California in 2006. Larvae of this species are highly polyphagous and feed on 545 known plant species in 363 genera and 121 families (Brockerhoff et al. 2011). In a previous study, Bürgi and Mills (2014) documented the parasitoid assemblage of E. postvittana in California and found that it did not differ from the assemblage in its native range with respect to richness, level of specialization, and parasitism rates. In the absence of any evidence for enemy release in California, there is the possibility for significant biotic resistance to the E. postvittana invasion from the resident parasitoid community. Therefore, our specific objectives in this study were to address the following three questions regarding E. postvittana populations in California: (1) does per capita survivorship from parasitism provide evidence of a component Allee effect?, (2) does the per capita population growth rate of E. postvittana populations provide evidence of compensatory or depensatory density feedback, indicating the potential for regulation or demographic Allee effects?, and (3) is parasitism responsible for compensatory density feedback in E. postvittana population growth rates?
Materials and methods
Sampling sites
Epiphyas postvittana populations were monitored at two sites in Golden Gate Park in San Francisco (37°45′59.12″N, 122°29′14.19″W referred to as SF1, and 37°45′54.31″N, 122°30′10.66″W referred to as SF2) and two urban sites in Santa Cruz (36°57′21.28″N, 122°2′15.39″W referred to as SC1, and 36°58′49.05″N, 121°54′32.11″W referred to as SC2). At the SF1 site, E. postvittana was sampled on Australian tea tree (Leptospermum laevigatum) which had been planted only a few years prior to the beginning of the study in 2008, ranged from 1 to 2 m in height, and were irrigated regularly in summer. At the SF2 site, a population was sampled on Australian tea tree plants that were much older (50+ years) with heights of up to 3.5 m. Epiphyas postvittana was sampled from small groups (patch diameters ranging from 2 to 4 m) of ornamental manzanita plants (Arctostaphylos densiflora) up to 0.5 m high at the SC1 site, which was located on a mulched road median in a suburban neighborhood. Manzanita was also sampled at the SC2 site where plants were 1.5 m high and formed a continuous 20 m long hedge surrounding a large parking lot. These sites were selected for regular sampling because, as noted by Geier and Briese (1980), in Australia extensive and virtually continuous infestations of E. postvittana are observed only in very specialized habitats such as suburban gardens and horticultural crops. These sites were thought to have had some of the longest established populations of E. postvittana in California based on initial numbers of adults collected in a pheromone-based trapping survey (USDA-APHIS 2012). The host plant species selected in each of the two locations were those that most consistently supported E. postvittana populations of sufficient abundance to allow destructive sampling. While E. postvittana was present on other host plant species in both locations, populations occurred only seasonally or were too small to allow effective sampling.
Epiphyas postvittana sampling and per capita population growth rate
From May 2008 until June 2010, sites were visited at 2-week intervals from April to October and at 4-week intervals from November to March. From July 2010 until July 2012 sites were visited three (SF) and four (SC) times per year. These periods had been identified as having the highest proportional representation of 4–6th instar larvae in the age structure of E. postvittana populations that have three (SF) and four (SC) overlapping generations throughout the year in California (Bürgi et al. 2011). As no larval parasitoids of tortricid hosts complete their development in the earlier instars (Mills 1994), sampling during times with highest proportional representation of 4th to 6th instar larvae allowed us to best estimate parasitism levels in the field. The timing of the sample periods varied slightly among years, with dates at SC sites being February 1–8 (early spring), May 10–17 (late spring), July 23–August 19 (summer), September 23–28 (fall) and at SF sites March 29–April 9 (spring), July 12–August 10 (summer), October 5–14 (fall). Sampling at site SC1 was terminated in August 2011 when plants were removed, and did not start until January 2009 at site SC2 as it was a replacement for a previously sampled site where the E. postvittana population proved to be too low to be adequately monitored.
To sample E. postvittana populations, 5-min counts of visible leafrolls were conducted on each of 22 Australian tea tree plants at SF1 and SF2, and on 22 manzanita plants at SC1 and 15 manzanita plants at SC2. At SF1, initially the number of leafrolls on whole plants were counted, requiring approximately 7 min to complete, but the sampling was switched to timed 5 min counts on 10 April 2009. In addition, the number of plants sampled at SC1 was reduced to 16 after a severe pruning event in October 2008.
At all four sites, 50 leafrolls were collected from additional non-sample plants on each sampling occasion. At SC1 we observed an obvious initial gradient in larval population densities and therefore collected 100 leafrolls from different plants throughout the sampling area. Leafrolls were brought back to the laboratory and carefully opened to determine occupancy by larvae and pupae. Proportional occupancy was determined as the number of individuals per leafroll (from 50 leafrolls, or 100 for SC1), which could exceed 1 at times because of double or triple occupancy of leafrolls. Larvae were reared to adults on a bean-based diet (Cunningham 2007) in 96 ml plastic cups (Solo Cup Company, Highland Park, IL) under constant conditions at 21 °C, 70–85 % RH and a 16:8 h L:D photoperiod. In July 2011, we changed the diet used to rear the E. postvittana larvae to Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) diet provided by the USDA-APHIS Pink Bollwork Rearing Facility located in Phoenix, Arizona (Bartlett and Wolf 1985).
The timed leafroll counts were then multiplied by the proportional occupancy and divided by 5 or 7 min to get a standardized measure of E. postvittana population density N (mean number of E. postvittana per minute) for each plant sampled at all sites. For each sampling site, per capita population growth rate on sampling date t was calculated as ln[N (t + 646 dd)/N (t)], since one E. postvittana generation from egg to an adult female that has laid 50 % of her eggs takes 646 degree days (dd), as found by Gutierrez et al. (2010) in a re-analysis of data from a laboratory study in Australia (Danthanarayana 1975). In an earlier study we confirmed that a 646 dd generation time provided a good match to the seasonal patterns of voltinism in field populations of E. postvittana in California (Bürgi et al. 2011). When time (t + 646 dd) did not coincide with an actual sampling date, but rather fell between sampling dates, population abundance was estimated by linear interpolation using the two bracketing sampling dates.
Parasitoid species and parasitism rates
Cups containing field-collected E. postvittana larvae were checked weekly for E. postvittana pupae and parasitoid cocoons. Pupae were removed from cups and kept in 33 ml plastic vials in groups of up to 5 pupae where parasitoid or moth emergence was monitored. After emergence, the identity of E. postvittana adults was checked using Gilligan and Epstein (2009). Parasitoid cocoons were kept separately in 38 ml glass vials to await adult emergence. Adult parasitoids were identified to genus before obtaining species determinations from a series of taxonomic specialists. Parasitism rates (as proportions) for primary larval and pupal parasitoids combined were estimated from the number of hosts parasitized (by either larval or pupal parasitoids) divided by the total number of host individuals collected on each occasion at each sampling site. We were unable to estimate parasitism rates in the more usual way (number of hosts parasitized divided by number of emerging moths plus parasitoids) due to some missing data on moth emergence. As there was consistent larval mortality (approximately 30 %) of E. postvittana during laboratory rearing, however, this may have led to an underestimation of parasitism rates since our method of calculation assumes that dead host larvae were not parasitized. All hyperparasitoids were found to be solitary species, and so hyperparasitism rates (as proportions) were estimated as the total number of hyperparasitoid individuals emerged divided by the total number of primary parasitoid cocoons collected. The relative frequency of parasitoid species at each sampling site was estimated as the number of host individuals parasitized by a particular parasitoid species divided by the total number of hosts parasitized.
Data analysis
All analyses were conducted using generalized additive mixed models (GAMMs, package “mgcv”) and R statistical software (R Development Core Team 2012). The use of GAMMs with non-parametric smoothing (function s()) allowed us to capture nonlinearities in the shape of the relationships between dependent and explanatory variables without having to select a particular parametric form. GAMMs also allowed us to take into account temporal pseudoreplication within each field site through repeated sampling, in the form of an exponential correlation (function corExp(form = ~degree days)) between sample dates that decreased exponentially with increasing temporal distance as represented by the number of degree days between them. Estimated degrees of freedom (edf), the degrees of freedom used to fit the smoothing function, varied for each explanatory variable and these results are presented separately for each model. The error distribution and link function for each model varied according to the measurement variable used, as indicated below. Since GAMMs cannot produce log likelihood estimates, parameter significance is presented as values for non-significant and significant parameters obtained from the full and reduced models respectively.
To assess whether parasitism caused a component Allee effect in E. postvittana populations, we tested for a positive relationship between per capita survivorship from parasitism (1–proportional parasitism rate for larval and pupal parasitoids combined) and E. postvittana population density separately for each sampling site, using GAMMs with a binomial error distribution and logit link.
As an assessment of evidence for compensatory or depensatory density feedback within E. postvittana populations, we examined the relationship between per capita population growth rate and E. postvittana population density separately for each sampling site, since plant species, plant age and local environmental conditions varied considerably between sites.
A positive relationship at low E. postvittana densities would suggest depensatory density feedback and hence a demographic Allee effect, while a negative relationship at higher E. postvittana densities would indicate compensatory density feedback and the potential for population regulation. To further assess whether parasitism could have the potential to regulate E. postvittana populations at each sampling site, we tested for a negative relationship between per capita population growth rate and parasitism rate. The effects of both parasitism and population density on per capita population growth rates of E. postvittana were tested simultaneously as explanatory variables in a single GAMM for each sampling site with a Gaussian error distribution and identity link.
Results
Epiphyas postvittana densities, parasitoid species and parasitism rates
For the period from May 2008 to July 2012 a total of 6222 E. postvittana individuals were collected and 994 parasitoids reared from the four sites sampled. Maximum E. postvittana densities per sampling date, averaged over all plants sampled, ranged from 111 E. postvittana counts per minute at SF1, to 60 and 61 at SC1 and SC2, and 16 at SF2 (Fig. 1). The total number of primary parasitoid species recorded was 16, and of hyperparasitoid species was six. The overall mean proportion of hosts parasitized was highest for the SF2 site at 0.35, lowest for the SC1 site at 0.03 and intermediate for SF1 (0.32) and SC2 (0.22). The dominant parasitoid in this study was Meteorus ictericus Nees, accounting for 51 % of total parasitism for all four sites combined, while the second most abundant parasitoid was Enytus eureka (Ashmead), which contributed 34 % to the total parasitism. Parasitoid species and their relative frequency at each site are given in Table 1. Rates of hyperparasitism were 0.31 (SF1), 0.23 (SF2), 0.00 (SC1) and 0.13 (SC2). Hyperparasitoid species were Gelis sp1, Gelis sp2, Scambus sp., Mesochorus sp. and unidentified spp, with Gelis sp1 being the most dominant hyperparasitoid accounting for 67 % of the total hyperparasitism. Hyperparasitism of M. ictericus was 0.16 for all sites combined compared to 0.77 for E. eureka and 0.07 on other parasitoid species.
Per capita survivorship from parasitism as a component Allee effect
The relationship between per capita survivorship from parasitism and E. postvittana population density at each sampling site was used to test for component Allee effects. These relationships were non-significant at the sites SF2 (edf = 1, df = 44, t = 0.62, P = 0.54) and SC1 (edf = 1, df = 46, t = 0.23, P = 0.82), but were significantly positive at the sites SF1 (edf = 1, df = 48, t = 2.04, P = 0.047) and SC2 (edf = 1, df = 37, t = 3.13, P = 0.003) (Fig. 2), with the latter thus being consistent with component Allee effects.
Compensatory or depensatory density feedback
To determine whether E. postvittana population growth rates exhibited compensatory or depensatory density feedback, indicating the potential for regulation or a demographic Allee effect, we examined the relationship between per capita population growth rate and E. postvittana population density. There was a strong nonlinear decline in per capita population growth rate with increasing E. postvittana population density, over the entire range of densities observed, that was highly significant at all four sampling sites (Fig. 3; Table 2). The absence of a positive relationship between population growth rate and population density at the lowest population densities confirmed the absence of any demographic Allee effects, while the negative relationship with increasing E. postvittana population density indicated strong compensatory density feedback. At all sampling sites, per capita population growth rates became negative at modest E. postvittana population densities and were estimated to be zero, representing the carrying capacity, at mean densities of 11.3, 6.8, 18.2 and 13.2 occupied leafrolls per minute for the sites SF1, SF2, SC1 and SC2 respectively.
To determine whether the compensatory density feedback could have been driven by parasitism as a potential regulating factor in E. postvittana populations, we examined the relationship between per capita population growth rate and parasitism rate at each sampling site. None of these relationships proved to be significant at any of the four sampling sites (Fig. 4; Table 2), suggesting that greater rates of parasitism did not influence per capita population growth rates and that resident parasitoids did not regulate E. postvittana populations.
Discussion
From this study, we found that although E. postvittana in California experienced a parasitism-induced component Allee effect at two of the four sampling sites, these component effects on survivorship from parasitism did not translate into demographic Allee effects at any of the sampling sites. We also found evidence for strong compensatory density feedback among E. postvittana populations at all four sampling sites, and that this was not caused by parasitoids as parasitism did not have any influence on per capita population growth rates. Nonetheless, we found that parasitism rates from the species-rich assemblage of resident parasitoids were unusually high, especially in spring and late summer, indicating substantial biotic resistance.
The relationship between per capita survivorship from parasitism and population density was not significant for two of the sites, but positive for the other two sites, suggesting that at least some populations of E. postvittana in California experience increased survivorship with population density representing a component Allee effect (Stephens et al. 1999). In the context of the different steps in the invasion process, if a component Allee effect from parasitism also generates a demographic Allee effect, it has the potential to impact small founder populations, preventing them from becoming established (Drake and Lodge 2006; Liebhold and Tobin 2008). While it is not uncommon for predators to induce component Allee effects (Gascoigne and Lipcius 2004; Angulo et al. 2007; Kramer et al. 2009; Kramer and Drake 2010), they only occasionally translate into demographic Allee effects (Angulo et al. 2007) due to the complex interaction of density feedbacks and density-independent factors acting on individual fitness (Gascoigne and Lipcius 2004). Similarly, for E. postvittana in California the component Allee effects from parasitism did not translate into demographic Allee effects, as per capita population growth rates did not show any evidence of an increase over the lowest range of population densities observed.
Surprisingly, we found that E. postvittana populations in California were influenced by compensatory density feedback at all four sampling sites, suggesting the potential for strong regulation. From life table studies of E. postvittana in Australia, Danthanarayana (1983) found that egg and 1st instar larval mortality were key factors in the dynamics of populations on apple trees and associated understory weeds. He identified arthropod predation as the most important source of mortality at all life stages, and that loss of potential fecundity, a factor that increased with larval density, also had an important influence on the egg stage. Since parasitism did not appear to influence per capita population growth rates of E. postvittana at any of the sample sites in California, other factors, such as generalist arthropod predation (Berryman 2002), and loss of potential fecundity either through food limitation or crowding (Snell et al. 2001; Rotem and Agrawal 2003), or through induced plant defenses (Karban and Baldwin 1997; Underwood 2000; Kessler et al. 2012) may have been responsible for the compensatory density feedback.
While generalist predators such as earwigs, spiders, and beetles have been observed to attack E. postvittana in its introduced range (Hogg et al. 2013), they are usually unable to generate strong responses due to a lack of aggregative or reproductive numerical responses to prey densities (Symondson et al. 2002; Gascoigne and Lipcius 2004), unless the prey species constitutes a major component of the total available prey (Symondson et al. 2002). Egg parasitism of E. postvittana by Trichogramma fasciatum and T. platneri was found to average 51 and 47 % from March to November 2009 and 2010 at the SC1 site (Roltsch et al. 2011), and has been recorded to be as high as 84 % in late summer (Wang et al. 2012). However, egg parasitism is typically rather lower earlier in the season, and more importantly, Roltsch et al. (2010) and Roltsch et al. (2011) found that E. postvittana eggs on L. laevigatum, the plant monitored at the two SF sampling sites in our study, were very rarely parasitized. We can therefore exclude egg parasitism as the main driver of the compensatory density feedback, at least for the two SF sites. Nonetheless, these unusually high parasitism rates by Trichogramma species could make an important contribution to the suppression of E. postvittana populations in California.
Another factor often found to contribute to compensatory density feedback is crowding or food limitation (Snell et al. 2001; Rotem and Agrawal 2003). However, in our study the density feedback was strongest at the lowest E. postvittana densities (less than 20 individuals per minute per plant) and at these low densities no obvious crowding or food limitation was observed in the field. This suggests that the most likely explanation for the compensatory density feedback at such low densities is induced plant defense, which can theoretically influence herbivore population growth rates (Edelstein-Keshet and Rausher 1989; Underwood 1999; Abbott et al. 2008), and has experimentally been shown to lead to compensatory reductions in larval growth rate (Underwood 2010), per capita fecundity (Sarfraz et al. 2013) and population growth rate with increasing herbivore density (Underwood and Rausher 2002). Similarly, Kaplan and Denno (2007) highlighted the importance of indirect effects via induced defenses rather than direct reduction of resources via defoliation in mediating interspecific competition among insect herbivores. The difference in host plants between our study on ornamentals in California and the apple orchard study by Danthanarayana (1983) in Australia may also be responsible for differences in the importance of induced plant defenses for the dynamics of E. postvitanna in these two studies. Although none of these potential explanatory factors were included in our study of E. postvittana populations in California, both induced plant defense and egg parasitism deserve greater attention in the future.
While parasitism by resident parasitoids showed no evidence of being able to regulate E. postvittana populations in California, parasitism rates did reach high levels in spring and late summer, particularly at the two sampling sites in San Francisco. Thus parasitism of E. postvittana populations undoubtedly contributes to the suppression of their population abundance. Since the host plants and sampling sites in our study were specifically chosen to provide consistent populations of E. postvittana of sufficient abundance to withstand destructive sampling, it is also possible that they represented exceptions in comparison with lower density populations at other locations and on other host plants. Whether these lower density populations are regulated by parasitoids or other factors remains unknown, but nonetheless, they provide further support for the importance of biotic resistance in suppressing the abundance of E. postvittana in California. In addition, continued monitoring throughout the later stages of the invasion process may reveal changes in the relative importance of the factors that have a regulatory influence on E. postvittana populations.
We conclude that despite the lack of enemy release and high parasitism rates observed for E. postvittana in California, the biotic resistance provided by resident larval and pupal parasitoids did not exhibit the characteristics needed to regulate E. postvittana populations. Further investigation will be needed to elucidate the extent to which biotic resistance from resident natural enemies can delay the spread and limit the impact of this newly established leafroller in California. In addition, further studies are needed to better address population-level effects of biotic resistance in invasive populations in order to more fully understand the complex interactions among factors that influence the success or failure of exotic invasions. Epiphyas postvittana in California represents an unusual case of an exotic insect herbivore that has met far greater resistance from resident parasitoids than is typical for accidentally introduced insect herbivores. While this resistance appeared to suppress rather than regulate E. postvittana abundance in California it deserves to be investigated further in combination with the observed compensatory density feedback as factors potentially limiting the invasiveness of E. postvittana in North America.
References
Abbott KC, Morris WF, Gross K (2008) Simultaneous effects of food limitation and inducible resistance on herbivore population dynamics. Theor Popul Biol 73:63–78
Allee WC (1931) Animal aggregations: a study in general sociology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Angulo E, Roemer GW, Berec L, Gascoigne J, Courchamp F (2007) Double Allee effects and extinction in the island fox. Conserv Biol 21:1082–1091
Bartlett AC, Wolf WW (1985) Pectinophora gossypiella. In: Moore RF, Singh P (eds) Handbook of Insect Rearing. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 415–430
Berryman AA (2002) Population cycles: the case of trophic interactions. Oxford University Press, New York
Brockerhoff EG, Suckling DM, Ecroyd CE, Wagstaff SJ, Raabe MC, Dowell RV, Wearing CH (2011) Worldwide host plants of the highly polyphagous, invasive Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J Econ Entomol 104:1514–1524
Bürgi LP, Mills NJ (2014) Lack of enemy release for an invasive leafroller in California: temporal patterns and influence of host plant origin. Biol Invasions 16:1021–1034
Bürgi LP, Roltsch WJ, Mills NJ (2011) Abundance, age structure, and voltinism of light brown apple moth populations in California. Environ Entomol 40:1370–1377
Carlsson NOL, Bustamante H, Strayer DL, Pace ML (2011) Biotic resistance on the increase: native predators structure invasive zebra mussel populations. Freshwater Biol 56:1630–1637
Catford JA, Jansson R, Nilsson C (2009) Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Divers Distrib 15:22–40
Colautti RI, Ricciardi A, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HJ (2004) Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol Lett 7:721–733
Courchamp F, Berec L, Gascoigne J (2008) Allee effects in ecology and conservation. Oxford University Press, New York
Cunningham N (2007) Lightbrown apple moth (LBAM) culture Epiphyas postvittana. South Australian Research and Development Institute (S.A.R.D.I.), Australia
Danthanarayana W (1975) The bionomics, distribution and host range of the light brown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Walk.) (Tortricidae). Aust J Zool 23:419–437
Danthanarayana W (1983) Population ecology of the light brown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J Anim Ecol 52:1–33
Davis MA (2009) Invasion biology. Oxford University Press, New York
Development Core Team R (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Drake JM, Lodge DM (2006) Allee effects, propagule pressure and the probability of establishment: risk analysis for biological invasions. Biol Invasions 8:365–375
Dumont C, Gaymer C, Thiel M (2011) Predation contributes to invasion resistance of benthic communities against the non-indigenous tunicate Ciona intestinalis. Biol Invasions 13:2023–2034
Edelstein-Keshet L, Rausher MD (1989) The effects of inducible plant defenses on herbivore populations. 1. Mobile herbivores in continuous time. Am Nat 133:787–810
Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions. Methuen, London
Gascoigne JC, Lipcius RN (2004) Allee effects driven by predation. J Appl Ecol 41:801–810
Geier PW, Briese DT (1980) The light-brown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Walker): 4. Studies on population dynamics and injuriousness to apples in the Australian Capital Territory. Austral Ecol 5:63–93
Gilligan TM, Epstein D (2009) LBAM ID: Tools for diagnosing light brown apple moth and related western U.S. leafrollers (Tortricidae: Archipini) [CD-ROM]. Center for Plant Health Science and Technology. USDA APHIS PPQ, Raleigh, NC
Gutierrez AP, Mills NJ, Ponti L (2010) Limits to the potential distribution of light brown apple moth in Arizona-California based on climate suitability and host plant availability. Biol Invasions 12:3319–3331
Halpern SL, Underwood N (2006) Approaches for testing herbivore effects on plant population dynamics. J Appl Ecol 43:922–929
Hassell MP (2000) The spatial and temporal dynamics of host-parasitoid interactions. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Herrando-Pérez S, Delean S, Brook BW, Bradshaw CJA (2012a) Density dependence: an ecological Tower of Babel. Oecologia 170:585–603
Herrando-Pérez S, Delean S, Brook BW, Bradshaw CJA (2012b) Decoupling of component and ensemble density feedbacks in birds and mammals. Ecology 93:1728–1740
Hogg BN, Wang X-G, Levy K, Mills NJ, Daane KM (2013) Complementary effects of resident natural enemies on the suppression of the introduced moth Epiphyas postvittana. Biol Control 64:125–131
Kaplan I, Denno RF (2007) Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects revisited: a quantitative assessment of competition theory. Ecol Lett 10:977–994
Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kessler A, Poveda K, Poelman EH (2012) Plant-induced responses and herbivore population dynamics. In: Barbosa P, Letourneau DK, Agrawal AA (eds) Insect outbreaks revisited. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., West Sussex, pp 89–112
Kramer AM, Drake JM (2010) Experimental demonstration of population extinction due to a predator-driven Allee effect. J Anim Ecol 79:633–639
Kramer AM, Dennis B, Liebhold AM, Drake JM (2009) The evidence for Allee effects. Popul Ecol 51:341–354
Levine JM, Adler PB, Yelenik SG (2004) A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecol Lett 7:975–989
Lewis MA, Kareiva P (1993) Allee dynamics and the spread of invading organisms. Theor Popul Biol 43:141–158
Liebhold A, Bascompte J (2003) The Allee effect, stochastic dynamics and the eradication of alien species. Ecol Lett 6:133–140
Liebhold AM, Tobin PC (2008) Population ecology of insect invasions and their management. Annu Rev Entomol 53:387–408
Liu H, Stiling P (2006) Testing the enemy release hypothesis: a review and meta-analysis. Biol Invasions 8:1535–1545
Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710
Maron JL, Vilà M (2001) When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95:361–373
McEvoy PB, Coombs EM (1999) Biological control of plant invaders: regional patterns, field experiments, and structured population models. Ecol Appl 9:387–401
Mills NJ (1994) Parasitoid guilds: defining the structure of the parasitoid communities of endopterygote insect hosts. Environ Entomol 23:1066–1083
Mills NJ (2005) Selecting effective parasitoids for biological control introductions: codling moth as a case study. Biol Control 34:274–282
Mitchell CE, Power AG (2003) Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421:625–627
Murdoch WW, Briggs CJ, Nisbet RM (2003) Consumer-resource dynamics. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Pyšek P, Richardson DM (2006) The biogeography of naturalization in alien plants. J Biogeogr 33:2040–2050
Raghu S, Wilson JR, Dhileepan K (2006) Refining the process of agent selection through understanding plant demography and plant response to herbivory. Aust J Entomol 45:308–316
Ricciardi A (2007) Are modern biological invasions an unprecedented form of global change? Conserv Biol 21:329–336
Ricciardi A, Cohen J (2007) The invasiveness of an introduced species does not predict its impact. Biol Invasions 9:309–315
Rohde K (2006) Nonequilibrium ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York
Roltsch W, Carruthers N, Stouthamer R, Saechao N (2010) Parasitism and predation of light brown apple moth eggs. In: Woods DM (ed) Biological control program 2009 annual summary. California Department of Food and Agriculture, Plant Health and Pest Prevention Services, CA, pp 9–11
Roltsch W, Carruthers N, Stouthammer R (2011) Field parasitism and predation of light brown apple moth eggs. In: Woods DM (ed) Biological control program 2010 annual summary. California Department of Food and Agriculture, Plant Health and Pest Prevention Services, CA, pp 30–32
Rotem KA, Agrawal AA (2003) Density dependent population growth of the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, on the host plant Leonurus cardiaca. Oikos 103:559–565
Sarfraz RM, Cory JS, Myers JH (2013) Life-history consequences and disease resistance of western tent caterpillars in response to localised, herbivore-induced changes in alder leaf quality. Ecol Entomol 38:61–67
Schmickl T, Karsai I (2010) The interplay of sex ratio, male success and density-independent mortality affects population dynamics. Ecol Model 221:1089–1097
Schutzenhofer MR, Valone TJ, Knight TM (2009) Herbivory and population dynamics of invasive and native Lespedeza. Oecologia 161:57–66
Seitz RD, Lipcius RN, Hines AH, Eggleston DB (2001) Density-dependent predation, habitat variation, and the persistence of marine bivalve prey. Ecology 82:2435–2451
Simberloff D (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:81–102
Snell TW, Dingmann BJ, Serra M (2001) Density-dependent regulation of natural and laboratory rotifer populations. Hydrobiologia 446/447:39–44
Stephens PA, Sutherland WJ, Freckleton RP (1999) What Is the Allee effect? Oikos 87:185–190
Symondson WOC, Glen DM, Ives AR, Langson CJ, Wiltshire CW (2002) Dynamics of the relationship between a generalist predator and slugs over five years. Ecology 83:137–147
Taylor CM, Hastings A (2005) Allee effects in biological invasions. Ecol Lett 8:895–908
Tobin PC, Berec L, Liebhold AM (2011) Exploiting Allee effects for managing biological invasions. Ecol Lett 14:615–624
Torchin ME, Lafferty KD, Dobson AP, McKenzie VJ, Kuris AM (2003) Introduced species and their missing parasites. Nature 421:628–630
Underwood N (1999) The influence of plant and herbivore characteristics on the interaction between induced resistance and herbivore population dynamics. Am Nat 153:282–294
Underwood N (2000) Density dependence in induced plant resistance to herbivore damage: threshold, strength and genetic variation. Oikos 89:295–300
Underwood N (2010) Density dependence in insect performance within individual plants: induced resistance to Spodoptera exigua in tomato. Oikos 119:1993–1999
Underwood N, Rausher M (2002) Comparing the consequences of induced and constitutive plant resistance for herbivore population dynamics. Am Nat 160:20–30
USDA-APHIS (2012) Light brown apple moth, program situation reports. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/lba_moth/index.shtml
Wang X-G, Levy K, Mills NJ, Daane KM (2012) Light brown apple moth in California: a diversity of host plants and indigenous parasitoids. Environ Entomol 41:81–90
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by funding from USDA-APHIS and the California Department of Food and Agriculture. We thank numerous taxonomists that helped identify the parasitoids, including John Luhman (University of Minnesota), James O’Hara (Invertebrate Biodiversity, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada), and John Heraty (UC Riverside). We also thank Wayne Sousa for his helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bürgi, L.P., Roltsch, W.J. & Mills, N.J. Allee effects and population regulation: a test for biotic resistance against an invasive leafroller by resident parasitoids. Popul Ecol 57, 215–225 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-014-0451-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-014-0451-4