Abstract
This study investigated changes in the roughness parameters (Sa in μm2 and Ra in μm) of yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) and large-grit sandblasted acid-etched (SLA) titanium (TI) materials after decontamination by erbium chromium-doped:yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser irradiation. Twenty disks were analyzed in this study: 10 disks of Y-TZP (5 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height), standardized with CAD–CAM procedures, and 10 disks of SLA TI (5 mm in diameter and 4 mm in thickness). Disks were randomized into four groups (n = 5), according to whether laser irradiation was performed: Y-TZP_G1 and TI_G1 were not treated by laser (control groups), whereas Y-TZP_G2 and TI_G2 were irradiated with Er,Cr:YSGG laser (1.5 W/20 Hz, air–water cooling proportion of 80 %/25 %). The surface topography of the disks was analyzed by confocal light microscopy. The mean Sa and Ra values were calculated from five profiles from each group. The results were statistically analyzed by t-test at the 95 % confidence level (α = 0.05). For Y-TZP, the Sa results (in mean ± SD) for Y-TZP_G1 and Y-TZP_G2 were 2.60 ± 1.1 and 0.80 ± 0.17 μm2, respectively, and the Ra results were 2.01 ± 0.71 and 0.18 ± 0.15 μm, respectively (both p < .05). For SLA TI, the Sa results for TI_G1 and TI_G2 were 1.99 ± 0.5 and 3.37 ± 0.75 μm2, respectively, and the Ra results were 1.78 ± 0.53 and 3.84 ± 0.63 μm, respectively (both p < .05). Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation alters the surface roughness of zirconia and SLA TI.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The rehabilitation of partially or totally edentulous patients with titanium (TI) implants has been associated with high success rates [1, 2]. The topography of the implant surface is a relevant factor for obtaining osseointegration [3, 4]. As-machined surfaces are relatively smoother than nano- and microstructured surfaces, and rougher surfaces show an increase in the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) that favors osseointegration [4]. Large-grit sandblasting with acid etching (SLA) is an implant surface modification that can improve osseointegration [5, 6]. Surface properties such as roughness also have a strong correlation with cellular behaviors, including adhesion, functional alterations, and proliferation [5].
Progress has been made in fabricating abutments and dental implant surfaces from zirconia ceramics [7, 8]. Pure zirconia can assume three crystallographic forms: monoclinic, tetragonal, and cubic [9]. Zirconia is the common name for zirconium dioxide (ZrO2) [10]. The addition of stabilizing oxides, such as Y2O3, allows the tetragonal structure to be retained at room temperature [9]. Zirconia ceramics, including yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP), feature biocompatibility, a tooth-like color, and inherent strength [11–13]. Y-TZP has been used as an alternative to TI for abutments and as a dental implant material [14–16]. The zirconia surface may also demonstrate decreased bacterial adhesion [17].
Studies raised some concerns regarding peri-implant disease [18, 19], which is caused by periodontal pathogens that incite bleeding on probing and crestal bone resorption [5, 19]. The implant surface can be decontaminated by several methods, such as ultrasonic and air–powder systems, as well as curette treatment [20–24]. Several laser systems have been studied for this purpose [25], including the gallium aluminum arsenide (GaAlAs) diode laser (980 nm in wavelength) [24–28], the neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser (1064 nm) [27, 29], the erbium (Er):YAG laser (2940 nm) [13, 22, 23, 26, 30, 31], the carbon dioxide laser [12, 20, 24, 26, 28, 30], and the erbium chromium-doped:yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser (2780 nm) [32–34].
Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation (at 1.5 W with water irrigation) has been studied as an alternative tool to decontaminate the surface of titanium implants presenting osteoblast attachment [32, 34, 35]. Although increased surface roughness may improve the bone healing response, it can also increase dental biofilm accumulation. This biofilm can be effectively removed by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation [35]. Heat conduction is minimized by using a water spray for cooling, to avoid thermal effects such as cracks and melted areas. However, disagreement remains as to whether direct laser application causes changes to the TI surface [36]. The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation under different conditions on roughness parameters for Y-TZP and SLA TI materials.
Results
Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4 report the effects of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation on the roughness parameters (Sa and Ra) of the Y-TZP material (Tables 1 and 2) and the SLA TI material (Tables 3 and 4). For Y-TZP, the untreated (control) group had higher Sa and Ra values than the laser-treated groups (p < .05 by t-test). The mean Sa values for Y-TZP_G1 and Y-TZP_G2 were 2.60 and 0.80 μm2, respectively (Table 1). For SLA TI, the untreated control group had lower Sa and Ra values than the laser-treated group (p < .05 by t-test). The mean Sa values for TI_G1 and TI_G2 were 1.99 and 3.37 μm2, respectively (Table 3).
Figures 1 and 2 show representative images obtained for the Y-TZP_G1 and Y-TZP_G2 groups, respectively. Figures 3 and 4 show the representative images obtained for TI_G1 and TI_G2, respectively. For the irradiated groups, the disks were treated with Er,Cr:YSGG (air/water 80 %/25 %). In addition to projections, the irradiated titanium surface (TI_G2) showed cracks with projections of 8 μm in height.
Discussion
Progression of a peri-implant infection can cause dental implant loss [19]. Plaque biofilm can alter the surface characteristics of the TI implant. Bacterial contamination of the surface has been shown to increase the amount of carbon at the dioxide layer [5, 35, 37]. The implant surface can be decontaminated by using chemical and mechanical agents, permitting subsequent re-osseointegration of the previously contaminated implant surface [38].
Studies have described thermal alterations of SLA-treated TI, such as melting after Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation, due to energy transfer to the TI surface. These changes are associated with the development of surface color changes and morphological damage [39]. Using scanning electron microscopy, Stubinger et al. [26] observed melted areas of the SLA-treated TI surface that had been irradiated by Er:YAG.
Sites with peri-implantitis can exhibit bacterial biofilm that is similar to chronic periodontitis [18, 35], which must be removed. Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation can be used to decontaminate the surface of the TI implant [34, 35]. In the present study, a power output setting of 1.5 W was selected on the basis of osteoblast attachment, according to studies by Romanos et al. [34] and Schwarz et al. [35]. On the other hand, a recent study [40] indicated that the use of an Er:YAG laser at 200 mJ/10 Hz can alter the TI implant surface with a negative effect on the viability and activity of osteoblasts. Figure 4 presents the irradiated TI surface. When the temperature surpasses the metallic melting and boiling thresholds, boiling occurs [39]. Changes (e.g., melting, coagulation, and exfoliation) of the coated implant surface after laser irradiation may have a negative effect on the BIC and affect the success of implant treatment [36, 39].
TI has been demonstrated to interact with laser treatment in different ways depending on the surface. In a previous report, the interaction of Er,Cr:YSGG with TI plasma-sprayed showed no superficial alteration under the highest power setting (6 W) [33]. However, our study showed superficial alterations at a lower power setting (1.5 W) and significant differences compared to the control group, with an increase in roughness and the presence of cracks. The TI surface presented visual alterations, which were confirmed by the confocal microscopy images. Parameters such as the output power, irradiation dose and duration, and the distance between the laser tip and the irradiated surface should also be considered [36].
Schwarz et al. [35] evaluated the decontamination of the SLA-treated TI surface with Er,Cr:YSGG at 1.5 W/20 Hz with an air/water proportion of 50 %/50 %. Using a methodology that was very similar to that of the present study, the authors related no thermal effect, such as melting or loss of porosity. The laser was applied in contact mode, whereas the present study used the focused mode. This fact could explain the morphological alterations and increased roughness found in this study.
The clinical application of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser to decontaminate the implant surface is different from the in vitro situation, given the presence of water in the oral cavity from the gingival fluid, saliva, and blood. The wavelength of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser is highly specific to water, and the utility of laser treatment for decontaminating superficial implants can be different in clinical situations. Moreover, the present paper describes the topography of disks and not real implants, so the relevance is limited. The good clinical results presented by Azzeh et al. [32] corroborate these results, although the surface topography of irradiated TI was not reported.
Zirconia material is widely used in biomedicine due its good properties [14]. It presents lower bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation compared to other currently used dental materials [17]. Using scanning electron microscopy, Stubinger et al. [12] analyzed the Er:YAG-irradiated zirconia surface under several settings and found no superficial alteration. Our results disagree with these findings because the Y-TZP disks showed decreased roughness and concomitant 3D alterations (Fig. 3B). When the implant surface characteristics are altered due to the use of inappropriate laser settings, the reattachment of connective tissue to the implant surface can be affected. Therefore, the surface morphology should not be modified during the decontamination process [36, 39].
To the best of our knowledge, there are no comparable studies. Therefore, further analysis is needed, especially of osteoblast behavior on laser-modified surfaces and the clinical use of this technique.
Conclusion
-
The Er,Cr:YSGG-irradiated Y-TZP surface showed a decrease in surface roughness compared to the non-irradiated group.
-
In contrast, the irradiated SLA TI surface showed an increase in surface roughness compared to the non-irradiated group, with the presence of superficial cracks.
-
Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation alters the surface roughness of zirconia and SLA TI.
References
Al-Nawas B, Kämmerer PW, Morbach T, Ladwein C, Wegener J, Wagner W (2012) Ten-year retrospective follow-up study of the TiOblast™ dental implant. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14:127–134
Dierens M, Vandeweghe S, Kisch J, Nilner K, De Bruyn H (2012) Long-term follow-up of turned single implants placed in periodontally healthy patients after 16–22 years: radiographic and peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:197–204
Shibli JA, Mangano C, D'avila S, Piattelli A, Pecora GE, Mangano F, Onuma T, Cardoso L, Ferrari DS, Aguiar KC, Iezzi G (2010) Influence of direct laser fabrication implant topography on type IV bone: a histomorphometric study in humans. J Biomed Mater Res A 93:607–614
Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Coelho PG, Kang BS, Sul YT, Albrektsson T (2010) Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography. Trends Biotechnol 28:198–206
Schwarz F, Wieland M, Schwartz Z, Zhao G, Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Schedle A, Broggini N, Bornstein MM, Buser D, Ferguson SJ, Becker J, Boyan BD, Cochran DL (2009) Potential of chemically modified hydrophilic surface characteristics to support tissue integration of titanium dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 88(2):544–557
D'Avila S, dos Reis LD, Piattelli A, Aguiar KC, de Faveri M, Borges FL, Iezzi G, Oliveira NT, de Cardoso LA, Shibli JA (2010) Impact of smoking on human bone apposition at different dental implant surfaces: a histologic study in type IV bone. J Oral Implantol 36:85–90
Nakamura K, Kanno T, Milleding P, Ortengren U (2010) Zirconia as a dental implant abutment material: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 23:299–309
Andreiotelli M, Wenz HJ, Kohal RJ (2009) Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res 20(Suppl 4):32–47
Denry I, Kelly JR (2008) State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 24:299–307
Akyil MS, Uzun IH, Bayindir F (2010) Bond strength of resin cement to yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia ceramic treated with air abrasion, silica coating, and laser irradiation. Photomed Laser Surg 28:801–808
Delgado-Ruíz RA, Calvo-Guirado JL, Moreno P, Guardia J, Gomez-Moreno G, Mate-Sánchez JE, Ramirez-Fernández P, Chiva F (2011) Femtosecond laser microstructuring of zirconia dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 96(1):91–100
Stübinger S, Homann F, Etter C, Miskiewicz M, Wieland M, Sader R (2008) Effect of Er:YAG, CO(2) and diode laser irradiation on surface properties of zirconia endosseous dental implants. Lasers Surg Med 40(3):223–228
Subası MG, Inan O (2012) Evaluation of the topographical surface changes and roughness of zirconia after different surface treatments. Lasers Med Sci 27(4):735–742
Gahlert M, Röhling S, Wieland M, Eichhorn S, Küchenhoff H, Kniha H (2010) A comparison study of the osseointegration of zirconia and titanium dental implants. A biomechanical evaluation in the maxilla of pigs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 12(4):297–305
Zembic A, Sailer I, Jung RE, Hämmerle CH (2009) Randomized-controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implants in canine and posterior regions: 3-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 20(8):802–808
Sailer I, Zembic A, Jung RE, Siegenthaler D, Holderegger C, Hämmerle CH (2009) Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: preliminary results at 1 year of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 20(3):219–225
Bremer F, Grade S, Kohorst P, Stiesch M (2011) In vivo biofilm formation on different dental ceramics. Quintessence Int 42(7):565–574
Shibli JA, Melo L, Ferrari DS, Figueiredo LC, Faveri M, Feres M (2008) Composition of supra- and subgingival biofilm of subjects with healthy and diseased implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 19:975–982
Lang NP, Berglundh T (2011) Peri-implant diseases: where are we now? — Consensus of the Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 38(Suppl 11):178–181
Shibli JA, Theodoro LH, Haypek P, Garcia VG, Marcantonio E Jr (2004) The effect of CO(2) laser irradiation on failed implant surfaces. Implant Dent 13:342–351
de Mendonça AC, Máximo MB, Rodrigues JA, Arrais CA, de Freitas PM, Duarte PM (2008) Er:YAG laser, ultrasonic system, and curette produce different profiles on dentine root surfaces: an in vitro study. Photomed Laser Surg 26(2):91–97
Schwarz F, Sculean A, Rothamel D, Schwenzer K, Gerog T, Becker J (2005) Clinical evaluation of an Er:YAG laser for nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a pilot study. Clin Oral Implant Res 16(1):44–52
Takasaki AA, Aoki A, Mizutani K, Kikuchi S, Oda S, Ishikawa I (2007) Er:YAG laser therapy for peri-implant infection: a histological study. Lasers Med Sci 22(3):143–157
Hauser-Gerspach I, Stübinger S, Meyer J (2010) Bactericidal effects of different laser systems on bacteria adhered to dental implant surfaces: an in vitro study comparing zirconia with titanium. Clin Oral Implants Res 21(3):277–283
Romanos GE, Gutknecht N, Dieter S, Schwarz F, Crespi R, Sculean A (2009) Laser wavelengths and oral implantology. Lasers Med Sci 24(6):961–970
Stübinger S, Etter C, Miskiewicz M, Homann F, Saldamli B, Wieland M, Sader R (2010) Surface alterations of polished and sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants after Er:YAG, carbon dioxide, and diode laser irradiation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25(1):104–111
Gonçalves F, Zanetti AL, Zanetti RV, Martelli FS, Avila-Campos MJ, Tomazinho LF, Granjeiro JM (2010) Effectiveness of 980-mm diode and 1064-nm extra-long-pulse neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet lasers in implant disinfection. Photomed Laser Surg 28(2):273–280
Kreisler M, Al Haj H, Götz H, Duschner H, d'Hoedt B (2002) Effect of simulated CO2 and GaAlAs laser surface decontamination on temperature changes in Ti-plasma sprayed dental implants. Laser Surg Med 30(3):233–239
Romanos GE, Everts H, Nentwig GH (2000) Effects of diode and Nd:YAG laser irradiation on titanium discs: a scanning electron microscope examination. J Periodontol 71:810–815
Geminiani A, Caton JG, Romanos GE (2011) Temperature increase during CO(2) and Er:YAG irradiation on implant surfaces. Implant Dent 20:379–382
Quaranta A, Maida C, Scrascia A, Campus G, Quaranta M (2009) Er:YAG laser application on titanium implant surfaces contaminated by Porphyromonas gingivalis: an histomorphometric evaluation. Minerva Stomatol 58(7–8):317–330
Azzeh MM (2008) Er,Cr:YSGG laser-assisted surgical treatment of peri-implantitis with 1-year reentry and 18-month follow-up. J Periodontol 79(10):2000–2005
Miller RJ (2004) Treatment of the contaminated implant surface using the Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Implant Dent 13(2):165–170
Romanos G, Crespi R, Barone A, Covani U (2006) Osteoblast attachment on titanium disks after laser irradiation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 21(2):232–236
Schwarz F, Nuesry E, Bieling K, Herten M, Becker J (2006) Influence of an erbium, chromium-doped yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser on the reestablishment of the biocompatibility of contaminated titanium implant surfaces. J Periodontol 77(11):1820–1827
Ercan E, Arin T, Kara L, Candirli C, Uysal C (2013) Effects of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation on the surface characteristics of titanium discs: an in vitro study. Lasers Med Sci. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1294-5
Shibli JA, Marcantonio E, d'Avila S, Guastaldi AC, Marcantonio E Jr (2005) Analysis of failed commercially pure titanium dental implants: a scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive spectrometer X-ray study. J Periodontol 76:1092–1099
Subramani K, Wismeijer D (2012) Decontamination of titanium implant surface and re-osseointegration to treat peri-implantitis: a literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:1043–1054
Kamel MS, Khosa A, Tawse-Smith A, Leichter J (2013) The use of laser therapy for dental implant surface decontamination: a narrative review of in vitro studies. Lasers Med Sci. doi:10.1007/s10103-013-1396-0
Galli C, Macaluso GM, Elezi E, Ravanetti F, Cacchioli A, Gualini G, Passeri G (2011) The effects of Er:YAG laser treatment on titanium surface profile and osteoblastic cell activity: an in vitro study. J Periodontol 82:1169–1177
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank TitaniumFIX, São Paulo, Brazil, for supplying the Y-TZP and titanium disks. The authors thank Ms. Sheila Schuindt do Carmo (LCT POLI-USP-Technology Characterization Laboratory, University of São Paulo, Brazil) for the technical support with confocal microscopy.
Disclosure
The authors have no interest in any of the companies or products mentioned in this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miranda, P.V., Rodrigues, J.A., Blay, A. et al. Surface alterations of zirconia and titanium substrates after Er,Cr:YSGG irradiation. Lasers Med Sci 30, 43–48 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1516-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1516-x