Introduction

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a chronic inflammatory disorder that mainly involves muscle and skin lesions, such as the Gottron's sign and heliotrope rash [13]. Interstitial pneumonia (IP) is a common complication of dermatomyositis (DM), causing increased morbidity and mortality [4, 5]. On the basis of the clinical course, DM patients with IP are classified into one of two groups: DM with acute/subacute IP (A/SIP) and DM with chronic IP (CIP). DM–CIP responds well to treatment with corticosteroids and has a good prognosis, whereas DM–A/SIP progresses rapidly, and the prognosis is poor. An aggressive combination therapy with corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs such as cyclosporin-A (CSA) and intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide (IVCY) needs to be performed in corticosteroid-resistant DM–A/SIP.

Recent studies have reported the efficacy of combination therapy with corticosteroids and CSA for DM–A/SIP. The survival rate in response to combination therapy ranges from 42% to 69%, and the prognosis remains poor [611]. We previously reported that an early intervention with corticosteroids and 4 mg/kg/day of CSA (within 11 days, 1–22) and 2-h post-dose blood concentration (C2) monitoring improved the prognosis of DM–A/SIP (survival rate, 89%) [12]. However, it remains unclear whether the combination therapy with steroids and CSA improves the findings of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans.

In this study, we evaluate the therapeutic changes of PFTs and chest HRCT scan findings before and 1 year after the combination therapy with corticosteroids and CSA and examine whether the therapeutic strategy involving CSA relates to the improvement of PFTs and chest HRCT scan findings.

Materials and methods

Patients

The subjects were 14 DM–A/SIP patients who were admitted to Osaka Medical College Hospital between January 2002 and January 2009. DM was diagnosed according to the criteria of Bohan and Peter [13, 14]. Clinically amyopathic DM (C-ADM) was diagnosed according to the criteria proposed by Sontheimer [15] and Gerami et al [16]. Patients with typical dermatomyositis-related exanthema who met three or more of the following four items were regarded as having definite DM, and those meeting two or more, as having probable DM: weakness of the proximal limb muscles, myositis verified on muscle biopsy, an increase in the serum myogenic enzyme level, and myogenic changes on electromyograms. IP was diagnosed by HRCT of the chest. Typical images of IP in DM show ground-glass opacity (GGO), consolidation, traction bronchiectasis, linear opacity, and less marked honeycomb lungs. DM patients with A/SIP experience an acute onset of respiratory symptoms and a rapid progressive course of within 3 months with respect to respiratory symptoms and laboratory findings such as those on chest X-rays, chest HRCT scans, PFTs, and arterial blood gas analyses. Four patients underwent bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and lung biopsy. After the exclusion of infections based on clinical and laboratory findings, all patients were treated with a combination therapy of corticosteroids and CSA and with C2 monitoring in the early stage of A/SIP. One patient died due to the rapid exacerbation of A/SIP on the 53rd day after admission. Of 13 patients who survived for 1 year after the diagnosis of DM–A/SIP, respiratory function tests and chest HRCT were performed before and 1 year after therapy in all patients (10 women, 3 men).

Pulmonary function test

Static and dynamic lung volumes were measured by spirometry (SYSTEM21; Minato Medical Science, Osaka, Japan). The total lung capacity (TLC) and vital capacity (VC) were determined by the N2 washout method. The diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was determined by the single-breath method. The results of PFT were expressed as a percentage of the predicted.

HRCT scoring

HRCT was performed using a 64-detector row CT Aquilion multiscanner (Toshiba Corporation Medical System, Tokyo, Japan). Slice thickness was 1.0–1.5 mm at every 10 mm, which included the entire lung. Typical images of IP in DM show GGO, consolidation, traction bronchiectasis, linear opacity, and less marked honeycomb lungs [17]. GGO showed more significant improvement than other findings in DM–IP, and the improvement of GGO correlated with the improvement of clinical manifestations and PFTs [18]. Therefore, GGO was scored to assess HRCT findings, as previously described [19]. Briefly, limited 3-CT levels were pre-selected: mid-arch of the aorta, tracheal carina, and 1 cm above the top of the right diaphragm. Each lobe (right upper, middle, and lower and left upper and lower lobes) of the lung was scored at the three sites on a scale of 0–5, and they were summed as the total CT score.

Treatment

All patients were treated initially with 1 mg/kg/day of prednisolone plus 4 mg/kg/day of CSA. All patients in this study started treatment with oral CSA. When it was difficult to administer CSA orally because of ventilation, liquid CSA was administered by a tube. CSA was administered within 14 days from the diagnosis of A/SIP. The area under the blood concentration–time curve (AUC) of CSA was found to be closely correlated with clinical effects. Nagai et al. reported that AUC is correlated with C2 in DM–A/SIP patients [20]. The dose of CSA was controlled with C2 monitoring to maintain the serum level at above 1,000 ng/ml in all patients, as previously described [12]. When IP progressed despite the combination of corticosteroids and CSA, methylprednisolone (MPDN) (1,000 mg × 3 days) and/or IVCY (200–500 mg/day) therapy was added. Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole was routinely given to all patients to prevent Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. The response to treatment and clinical course of IP were assessed using ATS guidelines [21].

Infection surveillance

For the surveillance of infection, complete blood cell counts, the serum C-reactive protein level, and serum levels of β-d-glucan and C7-HRP were measured, as previously described [12].

Statistical analysis

The difference in baseline clinical and laboratory findings between patients undergoing and not undergoing the additional treatment by MPDN and/or IVCY was evaluated using Fisher's exact test or the Mann–Whitney U test. Wilcoxon's rank sum test was used to assess both the CT score and PFT results before and after CSA treatment. Spearman's rank correlation was used to assess the association between the changes in respiratory functions, CT score, or serum creatinine (Cr) level vs the time from the diagnosis of IP to the initiation of the CSA treatment, CSA dose, CSA C2 level, or CSA trough (C0) level.

Results

Patient profiles and outcomes

The clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Fourteen patients (11 women, 3 men) with a mean age of 53.6 years (43–68 years) were included. Six had definite DM, and 8 had probable DM. The dyspnea scores based on the Hugh-Jones classification were level II in 3 patients, level III in 6 patients, and level IV in 5 patients. Nine of the 14 (64%) patients had C-ADM with a CK/LDH ratio of less than 2. Five of the 14 (36%) were positive for anti-Jo-1 antibodies. In all 4 patients who underwent BAL, the percentage of lymphocytes was high, and the CD8/CD4 ratio was increased. Lung biopsy was performed in 4 patients, and it was open lung biopsy in 3, all of whom presented findings of cellular non-specific interstitial pneumonia. Transbronchial lung biopsy was performed in the remaining 1 patient, yielding only very non-specific findings. Regarding the timing of complications of DM and IP, 3 cases had preceding IP, and the others were simultaneous. Pneumomediastinum was present in 3 (21%) patients. The therapies, response to therapies, and outcomes are summarized in Table 2. The average time from the diagnosis of IP to the initiation of CSA treatment was 4.4 days (1–12). The dose, the C0 level, and the C2 level were 208.9 mg/day (175–275), 178.8 ng/ml (71–456), and 1,336.6 ng/ml (814–2,873), respectively. Seven patients were treated with MPDN and/or IVCY in addition to the combination therapy of prednisolone and CSA. In the ADM group, the proportion of patients who underwent additional treatment was higher than in the non-ADM group (64.3% vs. 35.7%, respectively). There was no other significant difference in the clinical characteristics and respiratory function at the start of treatment between patients undergoing and not undergoing the additional treatment (data not shown). One patient (case 3) died due to the rapid exacerbation of A/SIP on the 53rd day after admission. Two patients (cases 3 and 8) required admission to the intensive care unit/ventilation. In the response to therapy, 10 showed an improved response; 3, a stable response, and 1 failed to respond to therapy. There were no differences in the response to therapy between the patients receiving and not receiving additional treatment such as MPDN and/or IVCY.

Table 1 Patient profiles (clinical findings)
Table 2 Patient profiles (therapies, response to therapies, and outcomes)

The improvement of PFT and chest CT score

The PFT and chest CT score before and 1 year after the combination therapy with prednisolone and CSA are shown in Fig. 1. TLC%, VC%, FVC%, and FEV1.0% before the therapy were 74.3% (range, 48.4–105.3), 74.0% (range, 51.3–100.5), 72.8% (range, 50.5–98.1), and 72.3% (range, 50.9–97.6), respectively. The DLCO% was markedly decreased at 44.9% (range, 30.2–67.5), and the CT score was 10.0 (range, 6–18). The PFT and CT scores improved 1 year after the therapy. The TLC%, VC%, FVC%, FEV1.0%, and CT score were significantly increased after the combination therapy (P = 0.027, 0.003, 0.002, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively), but DLCO% was not.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Change in pulmonary function tests and CT scan scores before and 1 year after combination therapy in each patient. The difference was significant (P < 0.05) by the Wilcoxon signed rank test. TLC total lung capacity, VC vital capacity, FVC forced vital capacity, FEV1.0 forced expiratory volume in 1.0 s, DLCO carbon monoxide diffusing capacity

The changes of PFT and CT score correlate with C2 level of CSA

We examined whether the improvement in the PFT and CT score were affected by the following factors: daily dose, C0 and C2 levels of CSA, and time from the diagnosis of IP to the initiation of CSA. The C2 level of CSA correlated with the therapeutic changes in FVC%, FEV1.0%, and DLCO% significantly (P = 0.047, 0.025, and 0.035, respectively), but not the changes in TLC%, VC%, and CT score (Fig. 2). The changes in the PFT and CT score revealed no correlation with the C0 level (Fig. 3) or the daily dose of CSA (data not shown). The time from the diagnosis of IP to the initiation of CSA correlated with the therapeutic changes in the CT score (P = 0.014) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The relationship between the C2 level of CSA and the changes in pulmonary function tests or CT score. The C2 level of CSA correlated with the therapeutic changes in FVC%, FEV1.0%, and DLCO% significantly (P = 0.047, 0.025, and 0.035, respectively) but not the changes in TLC%, VC%, and CT score

Fig. 3
figure 3

The relationship between the C0 level of CSA and the changes in pulmonary function tests or CT score. The changes in the PFT and CT score revealed no correlation with the C0 level

Fig. 4
figure 4

The relationship between the time from diagnosis of IP to initiation of Cy-A treatment and the changes in pulmonary function tests or CT score. The time from the diagnosis of IP to the initiation of Cy-A correlated with the therapeutic improvements in the CT score

Adverse events

The mean serum Cr level increased by 0.35 mg/dl (range, −0.09 to 0.72) 1 year after the therapy, but the change in serum Cr level was not correlated with the C0 and C2 levels of CSA (data not shown). The incidence of other side effects was not increased in 3 patients with C0 levels above 200 ng/ml. Diabetes mellitus was shown in 2 patients (cases 11 and 12), 1 patient treated with regular insulin at 27 U/day and the other patient treated with miglitol at 150 mg/day. Infections were identified in 5 out of the 13 patients, were caused by herpes virus (cases 2 and 7), bacteria (cases 6 and 8), or trichophytosis unguium (case 1) infection, and were successfully treated with acyclovir, antimicrobial agents, or fluconazole. Nine out of 14 patients had positive C7-HRP tests without clinical symptoms and were successfully treated with ganciclovir.

Discussion

Studies on the efficacy of combination therapy with corticosteroids and CSA for DM–A/SIP have been reported [611]. However, there are no established guidelines for this combination therapy. Recently, we reported the efficacy of early intervention with combination therapy and C2 monitoring of CSA for DM–A/SIP and suggested that the dose of CSA and the CSA administration time from diagnosis of IP were involved in the prognosis of DM–A/SIP [12]. In this study, we demonstrate that early intervention with prednisolone and CSA improved the findings of PFTs and chest HRCT scans and that the C2 level of CSA is significantly correlated with the improvement of PFT findings in DM–A/SIP. This suggests that tight control of the CSA dosage by C2 monitoring is needed to treat DM–A/SIP patients.

The results of PFTs and chest HRCT scans were improved by immunosuppressive drugs in IP patients with myositis. Yamasaki et al. reported that VC% and chest HRCT scan findings were improved by the combination therapy with corticosteroids and IVCY in 17 PM/DM–IP patients (3 with PM, 9 with DM, and 5 with ADM) during a mean follow-up of 32 months [22]. Arakawa et al. reported that chest HRCT scans were improved by the treatment in 14 nonspecific IP patients with associated PM/DM (3 with PM and 11 with DM) during a mean follow-up of 27.6 months [18]. The improvement in FVC% was positively correlated with the improvement of chest HRCT scan scores. These reports included PM–IP patients and chronic DM–IP patients with good prognoses, and it remains unclear whether immunosuppressive therapy improves the findings of PFTs and chest HRCT scans in DM–A/SIP patients who have a poor prognosis. The present study demonstrates that the combination therapy of corticosteroids and CSA improves the findings of PFT and chest HRCT as well as the prognosis in DM–A/SIP.

The daily CSA dose for the treatment of DM–A/SIP ranges from 100 to 300 mg/day [8, 10, 11, 23]. The absorption of CSA differs between individuals, and the C0 and C2 levels of CSA are monitored to determine the daily CSA dose. However, little attention has been given in this regard to the therapeutic dose of CSA in DM–A/SIP. In our study, the C2 level, but not the C0 level, was correlated with the improvement of PFT (Fig. 2). In organ transplantation, recent studies have indicated that the C2 level must reach approximately 1,000 ng/ml or more to achieve maximal immunosuppressive effect [24, 25]. The necessary C2 level of CSA for the treatment of DM–A/SIP remains unclear, and further studies are needed to determine this.

The time from diagnosis of A/SIP to initiation of CSA treatment was also crucial for the treatment of DM–A/SIP. CSA was effective and improved the prognosis in the treatment of DM–IP when given early during the course of IP [8, 12]. Yamasaki et al. reported that earlier intervention of corticosteroids and IVCY after diagnosis more markedly improved VC% in PM/DM–IP patients [22]. In this study, there was a positive correlation between the time from diagnosis of A/SIP to initiation of the combination therapy and the improvement in the CT score. However, no significant correlation was observed between the time interval from A/SIP diagnosis to the therapy initiation and the improvement of respiratory function. This is presumably because all patients were started on treatment as early as within 2 weeks after the diagnosis of A/SIP.

The major adverse effects of CSA were renal damage, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and liver damage. The incidence of side effects was significantly increased when the C0 level exceeded 200 ng/ml [26]. In this study the mean C0 level was 178.8 ng/ml (range, 71–456 ng/ml), when the mean C2 level was 1,336.6 ng/ml (range, 814–2,873 ng/ml). There was no significant relation between the change in Cr level and C0 or C2 level of CSA. Diabetes mellitus was observed in 2 patients; it is unclear whether this was due to Cy-A or corticosteroids. Viral infections, including herpes virus and cytomegalovirus, and bacterial infections were observed, but were treatable with acyclovir, ganciclovir, and antimicrobial agents. Thus, CSA could be safely used up to the above level of C0 and C2 for DM–A/SIP in this study, but repeated infection surveillance is needed.

We demonstrate that the combination of corticosteroids and CSA improved the findings of PFTs and chest HRCT scans in DM–A/SIP. Moreover, it was important to control the daily dose of CSA tightly by C2 monitoring alongside the early therapeutic intervention.