Abstract
Background
In modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA), it is important to reproduce both medial pivot motion and posterior femoral rollback to obtain greater postoperative knee flexion. Several studies have reported the factors affecting knee motion and range of motion after TKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the tibial insert geometry on the tibiofemoral contact kinematics, especially focusing on the medial pivot motion and posterior femoral rollback.
Methods
Seven cadaveric knees were replaced with the Advance Medial Pivot TKA, and two different geometries of polyethylene tibial insert, the standard medial pivot design (MP-design) and double high design (DH-design), were biomechanically compared. Four experimental configurations were evaluated in each specimen in this order: (1) the MP-design with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retaining, (2) the DH-design with PCL retaining, (3) the MP-design with PCL sacrificing, and (4) the DH-design with PCL sacrificing.
Results
Under the PCL-retaining condition, both designs showed no medial pivot but bicondylar femoral rollback more than 60° of knee flexion. In the MP-design, tibiofemoral contact point (estimated contact point, ECP) of the medial compartment was located on the posterior lip of the ball-insocket structure while demonstrating greater than 120° of knee flexion. The posterior translation was also the same in both designs. On the other hand, ECP of the MP-design and the DH-design showed only medial pivot pattern under the PCL-sacrificing condition. In the DH-design, ECP of the lateral compartment showed paradoxical anterior translation from 0° to 60° of knee flexion. Total posterior translation was significantly greater in the lateral compartment than that in the medial compartment.
Conclusions
The results of this study suggest that in this type of TKA system the ball-in-socket geometry in the MP-design has an advantage for reproducing medial pivot motion in the PCL-sacrificing condition, and the flexion path structure in the DH-design is considered to be both effective and safe for femoral rollback in the PCL-retaining condition. However, neither design is sufficient to reproduce medial pivot motion and posterior femoral rollback. Therefore, a different design of tibial insert is needed for more physiological kinematics after TKA.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Walker PS, Hakek JV. The load-bearing area in the knee joint. J Biomech 1972;5:581–589.
Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MAR. Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg 2000;82B:1189–1195.
Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mahfouz M. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;410:69–81.
Nakagawa S, Kadoya Y, Todo S, Kobayashi A, Sakamoto H, Freeman MAR, Yamano Y. Tibiofemoral movement 3: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg 2000;82B:1199–1200.
Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Fermier RW. The influence of total knee replacement design on walking and stair climbing. J Bone Joint Surg 1982;64A:1328–1335.
Laskin RS. Joint line position restoration during revision total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;404:169–171.
Banks SA, Markovich GD, Hodge WA. In vivo kinematics of cruciate-retaining and -substituting knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:297–303.
Uvehammer J, Karrholm J, Brandsson S, Herberts P, Carlsson L, Regner L. In vivo kinematics of total knee arthroplasty: flat compared with concave tibial joint surface. J Orthop Res 2000;18:856–864.
Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Paxson RD, Horff WA. Fluoroscopic analysis of kinematics after posterior-cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1995;77B:884–889.
Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CE, Ranawat CS, Scott RD, Thornhill TS, Lapp MA. In vivo anteroposterior femoro-tibial translation of the total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;356:47–57.
Blaha JD. A medial pivot geometry. Orthopedics 2002;25:963–964.
Schmidt R, Komistek RD, Blaha JD, Penenberg BL, Maloney WJ. Fluoroscopic analysis of cruciate-retaining and medial pivot knee implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;410:139–147.
Li G, DeFrate LE, Zayontz S, Park SE, Gill TJ. The effect of tibiofemoral joint kinematics on patellofemoral contact pressures under simulated muscle loads. J Orthop Res 2004;22:801–806.
Gill TJ, DeFrate LE, Wang C, Carey CT, Zayontz S, Zarins B, Li G. The effect of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on patellofemoral contact pressures in the knee joint under simulated muscle loads. Am J Sports Med 2004;32:109–115.
Hayashi T, Kurokawa M, Miyasaka M, Aizawa A, Kanaki A, Saito A, Ishioka A. A high-resolution line sensor-based photostereometric system for measuring jaw movements in 6 d.o.f. Front Med Biol Eng 1994;6:171–186.
Nishino K, Hayashi T, Suzuki Y, Koga Y, Omori G. Accuracy verification of the photostereometric system KKN/1B developed for intraoperative measurement of knee movement immediately after total knee arthroplasty. Front Med Biol Eng 1999;9:261–273.
Omori G, Nishino K, Suzuki Y, Segawa H, Hayashi T, Koga Y. Intraoperative measurement of knee motion in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2003;10:75–79.
Saari T, Uvehanmmer J, Carisson LV, Herberts P, Regnér L, Kärrholm J. Kinematics of three variations of the Freeman-Samuelson total knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;410:235–247.
Moonot P, Mu S, Railton GT, Field RE, Banks SA. Tibiofemoral kinematic analysis of knee flexion for a medial pivot knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009;17:927–934.
Most E, Zayontz S, Li G, Otterberg E, Sabbag K, Rubash HE. Femoral rollback after cruciate-retaining and stabilizing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;410:101–113.
Li G, Suggs J, Hanson G, Durbhakula S, Johnson T, Freiberg A. Three-dimensional tibiofemoral articular contact kinematics of a cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 2006;88A:395–402.
Shakespeare D, Ledger M, Kinzel V. Flexion after total knee replacement. A comparison between the Medial Pivot knee and a posterior stabilized implant. Knee 2006;13:371–373.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Omori, G., Onda, N., Shimura, M. et al. The effect of geometry of the tibial polyethylene insert on the tibiofemoral contact kinematics in Advance Medial Pivot total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 14, 754–760 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1402-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1402-3