Introduction

Microalgae are fast-growing photosynthetic microorganisms capable of generating biomass rich in several primary metabolites, such as proteins and lipids, as well as secondary metabolites, with a wide range of applications. The high quantity and quality of some of these molecules have stimulated the production of high-value products, including human health food, animal feed, biofuels, fine chemicals, and pharmaceuticals (Spolaore et al. 2006; Bux 2013; Richmond and Hu 2013).

One of the most promising uses of microalgal biomass is the production of biofuels. This can be achieved in three general ways: (1) direct production of microalgae to recover fuel molecules (e.g., ethanol, hydrogen and alkanes) without the need for extraction, (2) processing full microalgal biomass for fuel production, and (3) production of microalgae extracts to generate fuel molecules (USDOE 2010). In the third case, lipids are the main type of molecules prospected, and can be used as biodiesel through transesterification (Chisti 2007). The most important microalgae groups as a source of lipids are the chlorophytes and the diatoms (Sheehan et al. 1998). The levels of lipids in these microalgae are around 30 %, but the yield can be increased in some species by manipulating environmental conditions, especially by imposing stress, such as nutrient starvation, temperature (low, high) shift, changes in salinity and pH, light or UV irradiation (low, high), among others (Sharma et al. 2012).

The massive production of microalgal biomass is, in part, limited by the sensitivity of many species to environmental variations and competition with invasive species, which diminish the productivity of commercial algal processing. In this sense, extremophilic microalgae (e.g., acidophilic) have gained interest because of their ability to grow in extreme conditions, excluding eventual competitors, producing high-value compounds, while acting as a remediator of effluents (e.g., absorption/adsorption of heavy metals) (Inthorn 2001; Eibl et al. 2014; Kumar et al. 2015; Varshney et al. 2015). Microalgae groups are characterized by high morphophysiological and biochemical diversity. Although they are preferably phototrophic, some microalgae species are able to grow in the absence of light, consuming soluble organic molecules, such as sugars, organic acids, and acetate (heterotrophy). In the mixotrophic regime, CO2 and organic carbon are assimilated, and both metabolisms, heterotrophic and photosynthetic, operate simultaneously (Perez-Garcia et al. 2011). In fact, several authors have recently reported a significant increase in biomass, carbohydrates, and lipid contents of some microalgae species under mixotrophic and heterotrophic conditions when compared to phototrophic conditions (e.g., Liang et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2011; Giovanardi et al. 2013; Liang 2013; Liu et al. 2014; Rattanapoltee and Kaewkannetra 2014). In this case, enhanced lipid production is not related to stress, but to the effect of the organic carbon source (e.g., glucose) in Calvin Cycle, leading to a lower consumption of cofactors (e.g., ATP) and to a more economical formation of Acetyl CoA, the precursor of fatty acids (Xiong et al. 2010). Therefore, the ability to grow microalgae in extreme conditions and under heterotrophic or mixotrophic conditions represents a strategic line of research.

In algae and plants, the de novo synthesis of lipids uses carbon molecules photosynthetically fixed as substrate (e.g., 3-phosphoglycerate). Two large groups of lipids are synthesized in cells: polar and neutral. Polar lipids are major components of biological membranes, and neutral lipids are energy-rich compounds often stored in cytosolic lipid bodies consisting of triacylglycerides (TAG), sterols, sterol esters, monoglycerides (MAG), and diglycerides (DAG) (Harwood and Jones 1989; Li et al. 2010; Radakovits et al. 2010).

Detecting the production of neutral lipids is a challenge in biofuel research (Lee et al. 1998). However, combining flow cytometry with a fluorescent dye is highly effective for rapidly selecting and isolating strains of microalgae producing high levels of neutral lipids by the small quantities of biomass required (Montero et al. 2011; Guzman et al. 2012; Cirulis et al. 2012; Roleda et al. 2013; Velmurugan et al. 2013; Saltpati and Pal 2014; Wu et al. 2014).

Understanding the metabolism of species and strains of microalgae is critical to the successful development of cultivation and production processes (Trainor 2009). However, data on the formation and mobilization of lipid bodies at the subcellular level and the regulation of these processes are still scarce (Přibyl et al. 2012). Therefore, to expand this knowledge in the present study, light, confocal, and electron microscopy, as well as flow cytometry were used to characterize the physiological and morphological responses of an acidophilic, lipid-producing strain of Chlamydomonas acidophila LAFIC-004 cultivated under phototrophic, mixotrophic, and heterorophic conditions. Based on indications from literature, we hypothesize that this acidophilic strain could grow better under mixotrophic and heterotrophic conditions than in phototrophic conditions, increasing its content of lipids.

Material and methods

Microalgae strain and culture conditions

The acidophilic strain of C. acidophila LAFIC-004 was isolated from acidic coal mining drainage (AMD) in the Criciúma region of Santa Catarina State in southern Brazil (latitude 28°35′40.73″S, longitude 49°27′37.98″W) and held in the Microalgae Culture Collection of the Phycology Laboratory (MCC-LAFIC) at the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC). The strain was cultured in Modified Acid Medium (MAM, Olavenson and Stoke 1989), pH 3.6, irradiance of 50 μmol.m−2.s−1 (fluorescent lamps), photoperiod of 12 h, and temperature of 22 ± 2 °C. The formulation of MAM was (in g.L−1) (NH4)2 SO4 0.5, CaCl2·2H2O 0.01, MgSO4·7H2O 0.5, KH2PO4 0.3, NaCl 0.03, Na2-EDTA 0.01, (in mg.L−1) FeSO4·7H2O 4.98, H3BO3 2.86, MnCl2·4H2O 1.81, ZnSO4·5H2O 2.22, NaMoO4·2H2O 0.39, CuSO4·5H2O 0.079, Co(NO3)2·6H2O 0.0494, biotin 1.0, B12 10.0, and thiamine 20.0. The pH was adjusted to 3.6 with sulfuric acid. These growing conditions were defined as standard culture conditions for the strain.

Growth pattern of C. acidophila LAFIC-004 at standard culture conditions

Several growth experiments with C. acidophila LAFIC-004 were performed to assess the time of growth phases (exponential and stationary), as well as the exponential growth rate under standard phototrophic conditions, and to generate biomass for lipid analyses. These experiments were conducted in three to five replicates in flasks of 250 mL or 5000 mL with 10 % v/v of inoculum consisting of an exponentially growing culture of the strain. During the growth period, samples from these flasks were collected every 1 to 3 days for instant cell enumeration with Neubauer hemocytometer. Exponential and stationary phase were defined visually on the growth curve. Exponential growth rate (μ) was calculated according to Eq. 1, where De 0 is cell density (cells.mL−1) at the beginning of exponential phase, De f is cell density at the end of exponential phase, and t is elapsed time (days) between De 0 and De f.

$$ \mu =\frac{\left( \ln D{e}_{\mathrm{f}}- \ln D{e}_0\right)}{t} $$
(1)

Growth of C. acidophila LAFIC-004 at different conditions

Cultivation experiments were conducted to evaluate and compare the growth characteristics of the strain under phototrophic, mixotrophic, and heterotrophic conditions. Cultivation conditions were as follows: (a) phototrophic (Photo), standard conditions described above; (b) mixotrophic with 1 % glucose (Mix-Glu); (c) mixotrophic with 1 % acetate (Mix-Acet); (d) heterotrophic with 1 % glucose (Het-Glu); and (e) heterotrophic with 1 % acetate (Het-Acet). The tests were performed in triplicate using 250 mL flasks containing 150 mL of sterile culture medium and 10 mL of an axenic inoculum with cell density of approximately 4 × 106 cells.mL−1. Flasks of mixotrophic treatments were exposed to the same photoperiod and irradiance as those in phototrophic mode. Flasks of heterotrophic treatments were sealed with aluminum foil. All other culture variables were equal to the standard conditions already described. Glucose and acetate concentrations were used as defined by Moon et al. (2013). In each flask, cell density was determined by Neubauer hemocytometer at the time of inoculation (D 0) and at the supposed end of exponential phase (D f), as defined in the initial growth experiments under phototrophic conditions (see above). A relative growth rate was then generated by the percentage increase in cell density (cells.mL−1) along the incubation time, according to Eq. 2, where D 0 is cell density at the initial time, D f is cell density at final time, and Te is elapsed time (days). This equation was modified from Kain (1987) and is commonly used in the estimation of growth rates of macroalgae using dry weight, but it was adopted here for microalgae using cell density, replacing the equation of exponential growth, essentially because cell density data were available only at the beginning and end of the experiment. Generating a growth curve with daily data is difficult in axenic cultures because of the requirement of daily removal for sampling could cause contamination.

$$ \%\kern0.37em \mathrm{increase}=100\;\left[{\left(\frac{D_{\mathrm{f}}}{D_0}\right)}^{\raisebox{1ex}{$1$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$Te$}\right.}-1\right] $$
(2)

Samples from Photo, Mix-Glu, Het-Acet, and Het-Glu treatments were collected at the end of the experiment for morphological analysis by flow cytometry (size, complexity, and presence of neutral lipids), light microscopy (LM), confocal microscopy (CM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Mix-Acet treatment showed no growth, making it impossible to perform these analyses.

Lipid extraction and fatty acid analysis

It was determined the oil content and fatty acid profile in the standard phototrophic condition described above. The analyses were performed on the exponential and stationary growth phase as defined according to the growth curves from “Growth pattern of C. acidophila LAFIC-004 at standard culture conditions” section. The extraction and determination of lipid content was performed by gravimetry according to the method of Bligh and Dyer (1959), using 1 g of lyophilized biomass. Analysis was performed in triplicates. The oils were converted to fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) by heating with BF3-MeOH, as recommended by the AOCS standard methodology (Christie 1989). The esters were extracted with heptane and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4.

The chromatographic analysis was performed in a Shimadzu QP 2010 Plus gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with an AOC 20i Automatic Injector coupled to Mass Spectrometry (CG-EM). The method used was AOCS Ce 1c-89 (AOCS 2006). The heating conditions of the DB5 ms column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) were 150 °C (0.1 min) heating to 250 °C (3 °C.min−1) and then continuing heating at 30 °C.min−1 to 300 °C. In the mass detector, the temperature of the ionization source (electron impact, EI) and the interface temperature were both 280 °C. The injection system was used in split mode (1:5) at 250 °C, and the mass detector was maintained in the scan mode. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.0 mL.min−1. The methyl ester standards (Sigma ©) were injected along with the samples in triplicate in 1 μL aliquots.

Cell morphology analysis

For cell morphology analysis, live samples were analyzed and photographed with an Olympus BX 41 epifluorescence microscope equipped with a QCapture Software Pro 5.1 image capture system. For visualization of neutral lipids, samples were incubated with Nile Red—NR (9-diethylamina-5Hbenzo [α] phenoxazine-5-one; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) diluted in DMSO (0.25 mg.mL−1). Ten microliters of the stock solution were added into 2 mL of the cell suspension, mixed by vortexing, and then kept in the dark for 30 min. NR fluorescence was observed under confocal laser scanning microscopy (Leica DMI 6000 B) at 470 nm laser excitation with emission spectrum from 530 to 630 nm (Saltpati and Pal 2014). Chloroplast autofluorescence was observed at 488 nm laser excitation with emission spectrum from 650 to 750 nm (Zitta et al. 2013). One to three microscope slides of each test flask (treatment replicate) were made to observe and photograph the cells totaling 300 to 800 cells analyzed from each flask.

Detection of lipids, cell size, and complexity by flow cytometry

Cell suspensions from the different treatments containing 106 cells.mL−1 were stained with NR stock solution in a manner similar to that described above for cell morphology. Fluorescence read out was obtained using an excitation of 488 nm with an argon laser. The emission signal was measured in two channels under excitement: frontal fluorescence (FSC Forward Scatter) and lateral (SSC Side Scatter) through the detectors FITC (green fluorescence; 530/40 nm) and PE (orange fluorescence; 580/30 nm), indicative of pigments (carotenoids, chlorophyll) and neutral lipids, respectively, in the cells stained with NR. A cell suspension sample without the addition of NR dye was also analyzed in the flow cytometer for identification and characterization of cell populations through measures of size FSC (Forward Scatter) and complexity SSC (Side Scatter). For each event, 200,000 cells were analyzed automatically by the equipment. The fluorescence intensity was expressed as arbitrary units (a.u.), and the images were analyzed using the software Flowing ver. 2.5.1.

Cell ultrastructure analysis

TEM was performed according to the method of Bouzon et al. (2005) and Simioni et al. (2014). Samples were fixed with 2.5 % glutaraldehyde in sodium cacodylate buffer 0.1 M (pH 7.2) for 4 h at 4 °C. Thereafter, fixed samples were washed four times with sodium cacodylate buffer 0.1 M (pH 7.2) for 10 min. The material was post-fixed with 1 % osmium tetroxide (OsO4) and 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) for 2 h at room temperature. Then, three washes of 10 min each were performed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer. After washes, the samples were dehydrated in a growing series of acetone v/v (30, 50, 70, 90, and 100 %), 15 min each step. The final series of 100 % acetone was performed twice. The material was then infiltrated with Spurr’s resin in graded series of acetone-Spurr’s resin for 3 days, followed by two infiltrations with pure resin for 12 h, and finally polymerized in an oven at 70 °C for 24 h. The ultrathin sections (60 nm) were performed with a diamond knife on an ultramicrotome and subsequently stained with 1 % uranyl acetate for 20 min and 1 % lead citrate for 10 min. The sections were observed and photographed in a transmission electron microscope (JEM 1011; Central Laboratory of Electron Microscopy—LCME/UFSC) under acceleration of 80 kV.

Statistical analysis

The tests were performed using triplicates for each treatment. The use of three replicates for assays with this strain proved to be adequate in previous trials, since the inoculum was in exponential growth phase (healthy condition), as was the case in the present experiments, resulting in reproducible behavior. Means and standard errors were calculated for all treatments, and significant differences were determined by an analysis of variance according to Tukey’s highly significant differences test (p < 0.05). The comparison among the treatments was performed by one-way ANOVA test (p < 0.05).

Results

Growth pattern of C. acidophila strain LAFIC-004

After isolation and purification, the strain C. acidophila LAFIC-004 showed rapid acclimation and satisfactory growth under standard laboratory conditions. Thirteen growth curves obtained in these conditions were used to identify the approximate times for exponential and stationary growth phases of the strain (Table 1). Exponential phases lasted up to 13 days after inoculation and stationary phases extended to 30 days after inoculation. Based on these data, the typical times to exponential and stationary phases were defined to be 12 and 30 days, respectively. We chose to use the longer times obtained (curve no. 13, Table 1) assuming that they best characterize the typical biochemical state of cells in these growth phases. Flasks of curve no. 13 had a larger volume (5000 mL) and served to obtain and characterize the biomass of the strain at standard conditions.

Table 1 Growth data of C. acidophila LAFIC-004 in Modified Acid Medium, pH 3.6 under phototrophic conditions. μ, growth rate at exponential phase. SE, standard error of the mean. All experiments performed with three to five replicates in 150 mL flasks except no. 13 which was conducted in 5000 mL flasks for biomass production and determination of lipid content and fatty acid profile

Exponential growth rate (μ) of these cultures was then calculated with cell density data from the 3rd (De 0) and the 13th (De f) days, with 10 days of elapsed time (t). Average value for μ was 0.49 day−1. It is noteworthy that the pH varied by an average of only 0.3 unit in the cultures, even after 30 days of growth, indicating the acidic buffering capacity of the culture media.

Growth of C. acidophila LAFIC-004 at different conditions

The growth experiments under different conditions (phototrophic, mixotrophic, and heterotrophic) were conducted until the 12th day, assuming that, at the very least, phototrophic treatments would grow exponentially, thereby avoiding the possibility of excess dead cells from growth decay. Cultivation times were equalized for all treatments to compare growth efficiency.

Cell growth was higher in the Photo treatment (% increase, 87.9), followed by Mix-Glu (% increase, 56.5), presenting significant difference between them (p < 0.05). Growth in heterotrophic condition was low (% increase, 12.2) with no significant difference between treatments with glucose (Het-Glu) and acetate (Het-Acet) (p > 0.05) (Fig. 1). No growth was observed in the Mix-Acet treatment.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Percent of increase in C. acidophila LAFIC-004 cells in phototrophic (Photo) and mixotrophic conditions with 1 % glucose (Mix-Glu), heterotrophic with 1 % glucose (Het-Glu), and heterotrophic with 1 % acetate (Het-Acet) treatments. Letters indicate significantly different treatments according to the Tukey multiple comparison test (mean ± SD, n = 3)

Lipid content and fatty acid profile

C. acidophila LAFIC-004 showed relatively high levels of lipid production when grown under phototrophic conditions with 15.9 % in the exponential phase and 54.6 % in the late stationary phase indicating good potential as a lipid source (Fig. 2). The fatty acid profile showed considerable difference between the samples from the two growth phases (Fig. 2). The most abundant fatty acid in the oil obtained from exponential phase was hexadecanoic acid (C16:0) with 46.2 %, followed by (Z)-octadec-9-enoic acid (C18:1c) and (E)-octadec-11-enoic acid (C18:1t) with 31.4 and 14.7 %, respectively. In the oil obtained from the late stationary phase, the percentage of hexadecanoic acid (C16:0) decreased to 20.4 %, while(Z)-octadec-9-enoic acid (C18:1c) appeared as the most abundant, with 35.7 %, followed by (9Z,12Z)-octadeca-9,12-dienoic acid (C18:2) with 22.3 % (Fig. 2). In general, in both cases, saturated and mono- or diunsaturated fatty acids were more important.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Fatty acid profiles of C. acidophila strain LAFIC-004 from exponential growth phase (day 12) and stationary growth phase (day 30) under phototrophic conditions. Other S = unidentified saturated fatty acid (>2 %); Other U = unidentified unsaturated fatty acid (>2 %); Total S = total fatty acids saturated; Total U = total fatty acids unsaturated; Oil content = total oil content. Percentages are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, n = 3

Cell morphology

When analyzed by light microscopy, the Photo-treated cells of C. acididophila LAFIC-004 showed spherical shape with intense green color and vacuolated regions (Fig. 3a). These characteristics were also found in the cells treated with Mix-Glu (Fig. 3b). In Het-Glu treatment, cells showed a weak greenish color, but no vacuolated regions (Fig. 3c). In Het-Acet treatment, cells showed alterations in shape and pigmentation (Fig. 3d).

Fig. 3
figure 3

C. acidophila LAFIC-004 cells under different experimental conditions of cultivation. Light microscopy (ad), confocal laser scanning of autofluorescence of chloroplast (eh), and tagged with Nile Red (il). Cells showed greenish coloration with regions vacuolated in phototrophic condition (a) and mixotrophic with 1 % glucose (Mix-Glu) (b), while in heterotrophic condition with 1 % glucose (Het-Glu), cell number and size are reduced (c), together with the absence of pigmentation in cells with heterotrophic treatment with 1 % acetate (Het-Acet) treatment (d). The autofluorescence of chloroplasts (red) in phototrophic (e) and Mix-Glu (f) cells showed intense fluorescence with intact chloroplast structure. In Het-Glu treatment, chloroplast appeared granular with autofluorescence (g), while in Het-Acet treatment, cells showed little fluorescence (h). By Nile Red staining (yellow) of cells in phototrophic (i) and Mix-Glu treatments (j), yellow punctuations (arrowheads) could be observed, while these punctuations are decreased in Het-Glu (k) and Het-Acet treatments (l)

When analyzed by laser confocal scanning microscopy, cells from both Photo and Mix-Glu treatments showed intense chloroplast autofluorescence (Fig. 3e, f). In the Het-Glu treatment, cells showed a decrease in autofluorescence (Fig. 3g), and in Het-Acet treatment, cells presented little, or no, autofluorescence (Fig. 3h).

By laser confocal scanning microscopy, living cells treated with Photo and Mix-Glu and tagged with Nile Red showed yellowish punctuations, highlighting the neutral lipids (Fig. 3i, j). In Het-Glu and Het-Acet treatments, these punctuations were still visible, but fewer in number (Fig. 3k, l).

Lipid detection, cell size, and complexity by flow cytometry

Light scattering measurements of size (FSC-A) and cell complexity (SSC-A) of C. acidophila LAFIC-004 are presented in Fig. 4a, b, respectively. With respect to the cell size, all treatments presented statistical differences, but with regard to cellular complexity treatments, Photo and Mix-Glu showed no significant difference (p < 0.05); however, they were both significantly different from Het-Glu and Het-Acet treatments. Het-Glu and Het-Acet showed considerable changes in morphology and cell complexity.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Flow cytometry of living cells of C. acidophila strain LAFIC-004. a The FSC-A (fluorescence intensity referring to cell size); b SSC-A (fluorescence intensity referring to the cellular complexity); of C. acidophila—LAFIC-004 cells in phototrophic (Photo) and mixotrophic conditions with 1 % glucose (Mix-Glu), mixotrophic with 1 % acetate (Mix-Acet), heterotrophic with 1 % glucose (Het-Glu), and heterotrophic with 1 % acetate (Het-Acet) treatments. The letters indicate significantly different treatments according to the multiple comparison Tukey test (different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05) (mean ± SD, n = 3)

Photo and Mix-Glu treatments showed a heterogeneous cell distribution (Fig. 5) with medium and large sizes and low complexity. Cells treated with Het-Glu had a more homogeneous distribution compared with Photo-treated cells which were smaller in size and had low complexity. On the other hand, cells treated with Het-Acet showed high complexity compared to the other treatments, and most cells were small in size (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Flow cytometry of living cells of C. acidophila strain LAFIC-004. Dot plot - cell size (FSC-A) vs. cellular complexity (SSC-A) of C. acidophila LAFIC-004 cells in phototrophic (Photo) and mixotrophic conditions with 1 % glucose (Mix-Glu), mixotrophic with 1 % acetate (Mix-Acet), heterotrophic with 1 % glucose (Het-Glu), and heterotrophic with 1 % acetate (Het-Acet) treatments

NR was efficient in staining cell pigments, showing significant differences when scanned through the FITC channel (Fig. 6a). Photo treatment showed the highest fluorescence intensity, followed by Mix-Glu. Het-Acet treatment showed the lowest fluorescence intensity. These results are related to the cell density data, which revealed higher increase by Photo treatment, followed by Mix-Glu. Neutral lipids, as represented by the fluorescence intensity of treatments stained with NR and then scanned through PE channel, showed no significant difference between Photo and Mix-Glu treatments in contrast to both heterotrophic treatments (Fig. 6b). Between heterotrophic treatments, Het-Glu showed greater fluorescence than that shown by Het-Acet (Fig. 6b).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Flow cytometry of living cells of C. acidophila strain LAFIC-004. a FITC-A Nile Red (NR) (cells marked with the fluorescence signal NR 530/40 nm), FITC-A (unmarked cells—fluorescence signal 530/40 nm); (b) PE-NR (cells marked with the NR—fluorescence signal 580/30 nm—referring to neutral lipids), PE-A (unmarked cells—fluorescence signal 580/30 nm) in the following treatments: phototrophic (Photo), mixotrophic with 1 % glucose (Mix-Glu), heterotrophic with 1 % glucose (Het-Glu), and heterotrophic with 1 % acetate (Het-Acet). The letters indicate significantly different treatments according to the multiple comparison Tukey test (different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05) (mean ± SD, n = 3)

Cell ultrastructure

When observed under TEM, Photo-treated cells of C. acidophila LAFIC-004 showed a typical Chlamydomonadaceae structure with one chloroplast occupying most of the cell volume and elongated thylakoids in groups of three or four (Fig. 7a, b). Inside the chloroplast, it was possible to observe the eyespot, a carotenoid concentration region (Fig. 7c), as well as a large pyrenoid surrounded by starch grains (Fig. 7d). Additionally, several lipid bodies with peripheral electron-dense punctuations were visualized (Fig. 7e, f).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Transmission electron microscopy of C. acidophila strain LAFIC-004 grown after 12 days under phototrophic condition. a, b Cells show a chloroplast occupying the whole cytoplasmic volume with presence of eyespot (c) and pyrenoid (d) surrounded by starch grains and various lipid bodies (e) with structures inside electron-dense punctuations (arrows) (f). Chloroplast (C), pyrenoid (P), lipid bodies (LB), starch grains (S), flagellum (F), eyespot (E)

The cells of Mix-Glu treatment showed similar characteristics to those from Photo treatment, with a chloroplast occupying almost the entire cell volume and the presence of organized and elongated thylakoids, with evident pyrenoid and eyespot (Fig. 8ad). The starch grains dispersed inside the chloroplast were observed in larger amount compared to phototrophic (Fig. 8e). Furthermore, the lipid bodies were visualized in greater quantities in this treatment, showing peripheral electron-dense punctuations (Fig. 8f).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Transmission electron microscopy of C. acidophila strain LAFIC-004 grown after 12 days under mixotrophic treatment with glucose (Mix-Glu) (a, f). Cells with characteristic chloroplast presence of starch grains (a, b), pyrenoid (c), and eyespot (d). Structure of thylakoids in the presence of starch grains (e). Note the increased number of lipid bodies with electron-dense structures (arrows) (f). Chloroplast (C) pyrenoid (P), lipid bodies (LB), starch grains (S), eyespot (E)

In Het-Glu treatment, cells showed altered form, confirming observations from light microscopy, but maintaining cell organization with visible thylakoid membranes in the chloroplast (Fig. 9a, b). A decrease in the number and size of starch grains was seen around the pyrenoid (Fig. 9b, c), as well as an increase of electron-dense punctuations in lipid bodies (Fig. 9d).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Transmission electron microscopy of C. acidophila strain LAFIC-004 grown after 12 days under heterotrophic treatment with glucose (Het-Glu) (ad). Cells presenting chloroplast occupying less cell volume, but with characteristic thylakoids (a, b) and pyrenoid with few starch grains and visible thylakoid membranes (c). Lipid bodies are increased by electron-dense punctuations (d). Chloroplast (C) pyrenoid (P), lipid bodies (LB), starch grains (S), eyespot (E)

Under Het-Acet treatment, dramatic changes in cell structure could be observed (Fig. 10a). The thylakoids appeared degenerated throughout the cell (Fig. 10b, c), and only a few lipid bodies and starch grains were observed. Furthermore, electron-dense punctuations appeared inside the pyrenoid, a feature not observed in the other treatments (Fig. 10d).

Fig. 10
figure 10

Transmission electron microscopy of C. acidophila strain LAFIC-004 grown after 12 days under heterotrophic treatment with acetate (Het-Acet) (ad). Cells with altered structure of the chloroplast (a, b). Detail of disintegrated thylakoids (c). Pyrenoid with electron-dense punctuations inside (d). Chloroplast (C), pyrenoid (P), lipid bodies (LB), starch grains (S)

Discussion

C. acidophila LAFIC-004 was easily cultivated under phototrophic conditions when maintaining culture medium pH similar to that found in its original environment (2.5–3.8). Growth rate at the standard defined conditions (mean 0.49 day-1) was similar to other strains of C. acidophila, which ranged from 0.32 to 0.88 day-1 (Gerloff-Elias et al. 2005; Cuaresma et al. 2006; Tittel et al. 2005). As already reported by several authors, stress promoted by extreme acidity results in high energy consumption since acidophilic microalgae tend to actively maintain nearly neutral intracellular pH, despite external values (Gerloff-Elias et al. 2005). Moreover, at highly acidic pH, inorganic carbon (CO2) availability is severely limited (Tittel et al. 2005). Manipulation of culture conditions (irradiance, shaking/aeration, carbon supply) would probably yield higher growth rates. Considering the biotechnological potential of this species in bioremediation (Nishikawa et al. 2003) and lipid production (Langner et al. 2009), alternative culture conditions that enhance this potential and this growth rate can contribute to the viability of commercial applications.

In the present study, we assessed the growth and some physiological and biochemical characteristics of the C. acidophila LAFIC-004 strain when cultivated under different conditions (phototrophic, heterotrophic, and mixotrophic), with the use of glucose and acetate as organic carbon sources. Several authors have reported heterotrophic and mixotrophic cultivation modes as good strategies for enhancing growth rates and lipid content in microalgae. Moon et al. (2013) found that Chlamydomonas reinhardtii showed higher growth in mixotrophic condition using 1 % acetate, but no growth was reported for this species under heterotrophic condition. Doebbe et al. (2007) have shown that absorption of glucose in C. reinhardtii is limited by the absence of glucose transporters. However, other strains of C. acidophila showed satisfactory growth in mixotrophic cultures with glucose (Spijkerman 2007), indicating that the ability to use different sources of organic carbon varies within the genus and even among different strains of the same species. Nevertheless, the higher growth and lipid production for C. acidophila LAFIC-004 were observed in phototrophic condition. Cells cultivated under this condition showed integrity and normal intracellular structure. Also, intense chlorophyll a fluorescence was detected through confocal microscopy and flow cytometry, indicating high photosynthetic activity.

Cells in the Mix-Glu treatment showed morphophysiological and ultrastructural characteristics similar to those of Photo treatment. The amount of lipid bodies was equivalent, and the population was heterogeneous, showing different cell sizes, but lower growth rate. This lower growth rate is not in accordance with previous studies where C. acidophila showed the greatest growth under mixotrophic conditions (Tittel et al. 2005). Heterogeneity in cell population is unquestionably related to the reproductive cycle of the genus Chlamydomonas, which features several cell types with different sizes and structures, including young cells, mature cells, gametes, zygotes, and zoospores (Harris 2009). Sexual reproduction in Chlamydomonas spp. is mainly induced by nitrogen starvation. In laboratory cultures, this condition is usually seen at the end of the exponential growth phase, the phase in which cultures of this study were analyzed, both flow cytometry and ultrastructure analysis. Thus, the highest population heterogeneity seen in the Photo and Mix-Glu treatments can be explained by the greater diversity of cell types, resulting from sexual reproduction. In the Het-Glu treatment, in turn, the relative homogeneity of cell population indicates lack of sexual reproduction, probably because of dark condition, since gametogenesis in this genus is dependent on, or, at least, facilitated by, light (Saito et al. 1998).

It is expected that the Mix-Glu treatment would show higher growth rates than Photo treatment since glucose represents an additional source of carbon and energy. This would be especially advantageous in extremely acidic environments as a result of limited CO2, but this situation has not been verified in our results. We selected three possible explanations for this apparently contradictory result: (a) inability to absorb glucose, (b) regulated growth rate, and (c) unbalanced nutrients in culture media with a high concentration of carbon compared to inorganic nutrients, such as N or P. The first explanation can be refuted, since several studies show that C. acidophila, as well as other species of the genus, can absorb and assimilate glucose (Bissinger et al. 2000; Tittel et al. 2005; Spijkerman 2007). Furthermore, the Mix-Glu treatment showed a greater amount of starch than the Photo treatment, suggesting the participation of glucose in the synthesis of this storage product. This evidence refutes the first explanation.

Regarding the regulation of growth rate, two aspects must be considered. First, this species is extremophilic. Such species are tolerant to environmental extremes and have evolved to grow under one such regime, having virtually no competitors (Seckbach and Oren 2007). This condition eliminates the need for high growth rates by allowing the use of energy for maintenance, rather than growth (e.g., tolerating extreme conditions). Second, the abundance of glucose could reduce the expression of genes (enzymes and transporters) involved in photosynthesis light phase. As a result, in mixotrophic condition, the strain may be growing only, or mainly, by glucose consumption, even in the presence of light. Although this effect of glucose has been reported in a wide range of algae and higher plants (Jang and Sheen 1994), it was not mentioned in other C. acidophila mixotrophic growth studies.

The third explanation considers the possibility that reduced growth in mixotrophic condition is associated with high relative concentration of carbon in the medium, e.g., high C/N ratio, from glucose. This may have restricted the otherwise balanced growth of the strain which then responded with a greater accumulation of storage products (starch) in place of growth/reproduction. In fact, the presence of glucose shortens the route of starch synthesis since glucose is directly phosphorylated to glucose-6P and subsequently polymerized, while in the phototrophic pathway with inorganic carbon source (CO2), the Calvin cycle must occur prior to produce glucose. In this case, supplementation with inorganic nutrients would likely result in higher growth in the Mix-Glu condition. Studies on the expression of genes related to metabolism are needed for definitive explanations of these issues, which are beyond the scope of the present work.

Under Het-Glu treatment, the cell population was more homogeneous and small in size, exhibiting severe intracellular changes, low pigmentation, and fewer starch granules. This seems to set the stage for low, or no, growth, in turn, threatening survival. It also means that glucose was likely not used as the energy source by this strain in the dark condition. Therefore, survival in this treatment probably resulted from existing intracellular stores. In turn, this suggests that the smaller amount of starch in this treatment could be related to consumption and the inactivation of synthesis as a consequence of the dark condition. The first step of starch synthesis in the plastid is catalyzed by ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase), which converts glucose 1-phosphate and ATP to ADP-glucose and PPi, which then initiates the polymerization to starch (Kolbe et al. 2005). The redox activation of AGPase needs the reducing power that comes from the light phase reactions of photosynthesis (Buchanan 1980). This would explain the blockade of synthesis in the absence of light.

Acetate was the carbon source that caused the most pronounced cellular changes. Mix-Acet treatment caused cell death, while under Het-Acet treatment, the cells appeared severely damaged. Pirastru et al. (2012) demonstrated that the growth of the green microalgae Scenedesmus sp. in low light with acetate (60–120 mM) showed decreased pigment content concomitant with a decline of electron transport from PSII to PSI. In our study, acetate also affected the photosynthetic activity, as observed by flow cytometry and changes in thylakoids, as observed in TEM images. The disruption of internal membranes clearly indicates acetate toxicity under the tested conditions. This toxicity must be related to the acidic pH of the culture medium used in this study. Chen and Jonhns (1994; 1996) drew attention to the toxicity of acetate in its undissociated form, which is prevalent in pH under 4.8. These authors reported that concentrations above 0.4 g L-1 acetate inhibited the growth of C. reinhardtii. Inhibition of cell growth by acetate occurs by chemical interference with the membrane transport of phosphate, which might result in more expenditure of ATP, causing disruption of cell membranes and changes in cell morphology with the cells becoming irregular and elongated. Moreover, Moon et al. (2013) found that C. reinhardtii grew on acetate at higher pH conditions.

Finally, it is important to mention that some microalgae are obligate phototrophs by the lack of transport mechanism for efficient absorption of organic carbon sources. When these transporters are introduced, cells are able to grow heterotrophically (Chen and Chen 2006; Doebbe et al. 2007). However, some microalgae species, such as Dunaliella tertiolecta and Prymnesium parvum, are unable to assimilate glucose, although having the enzymes needed for its metabolism (Neilson and Lewin 1974). Similarly, the primary causes of obligate photoautotrophic growth have been attributed to incomplete pathways in the central carbon metabolism, or, perhaps, the absence of enzymatic reaction (Chen and Chen 2006). These findings have led to a greater understanding of microalgae genomics in the last decade (Radakovits et al. 2010), resulting in the publication of genome sequences for some species of microalgae, thus clarifying their metabolic pathways (e.g., Armbrust et al. 2004; Nozaki et al. 2007; Bowler et al. 2008; Blanc et al. 2010; Prochnik et al. 2010). In the case of the strain studied here, evidence suggests no particular lack of these transporters and enzymes.

Lipid analysis of C. acidophila LAFIC-004 in phototrophic condition showed 15 % oil content in the exponential phase, which is considered a reasonable result for a strain grown in acidic medium. Chlamydomonas spp. yield, in general, around 20 % in lipids by dry weight (DW) (Wang et al. 2009; Work et al. 2010; Mou et al. 2012). When cultures of our strain were kept until late stationary phase, the oil content reached the surprisingly high value of 54 %. This increase was probably related to the lack of inorganic nutrients in the medium, a common phenomenon in stationary phase cultures. In C. reinhardtii, the most studied species of the genus, this value tends to increase up to 46 % with nitrogen starvation or in mutants where starch synthesis was inhibited (Wang et al. 2009; Li et al. 2015.). Similar values were obtained with NaCl stress in Chlamydomonas mexicana (Salama et al. 2013). These stress conditions can be induced in cultures, or they may be performed in cells taken into stationary growth phase by the tendency to store lipids because of limited nutrients or other resources. Consensus in the literature holds that good lipid-producer microalgae should yield at least 40 % of the dry biomass in lipids (Chisti 2013). To produce high-quality biodiesel, for example, neutral lipids composed of saturated fatty acids, especially C16:0 and C18:0, are desired, with no larger percentage of unsaturated fatty acids than 12 % (Eibl et al. 2014). In C. acidophila LAFIC-004, the percentage of saturated fatty acids decreased from 49.12 % in biomass at exponential phase to 33.74 % in biomass at stationary phase. Also, among the unsaturated fatty acids, most were monounsaturated C18:1c (35.7 %) and diunsaturated C18:2 (22.3 %), which does not compromise the quality of oil for use in biodiesel fuel, as would be the case for polyunsaturated fatty acids (Eibl et al. 2014). These lipid data suggest a considerable potential of the strain, either for biodiesel production or other uses. This fact is enhanced if it is taken into consideration that the strain can be grown in wastewater-like acidic drainage from coal mining (AMD), in which the microalgae could most likely perform biosorption of heavy metals, as an additional benefit.

From the results of the present study, it can be concluded that the acidophilic strain C. acidophila LAFIC-004 is a good producer of neutral lipids and has a fatty acid profile suitable for biofuel production. The best condition for lipid production was found to be phototrophic cultivation until late stationary phase. Culture under mixotrophic and heterotrophic conditions with glucose at 1 % did not result in any significant growth increase, and acetate is most likely toxic because of the low pH of the culture medium. Adjustments in inorganic nutrient concentrations may eventually improve the performance of the strain in mixotrophic condition with glucose. Finally, considering that C. acidophila LAFIC-004 grows well in acidic and heavy metal-rich wastewater, typical features of acidic mining drainage, a double benefit can be achieved in a future upscale scenario whereby useful biomass is produced, while remediating residues for heavy metals.