Abstract
The supraclinoid ICA fenestration (SIF) is considered an extremely rare congenital anomaly. However, most of the reported cases of SIF are associated with intracranial aneurysms either ruptured or unruptured. We report the case of a 55-year-old patient with a right SIF and an unruptured, large, wide-necked aneurysm located on the larger limb of the fenestration and a second small aneurysm distal to the SIF. The aneurysms were treated with a Pipeline flow-diverter stent, achieving the complete reconstruction of the anatomy of the carotid siphon. The literature concerning these peculiar anatomic conditions has been reviewed, allowing discussion about treatment of such associated lesions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Case report
A 55-year-old male was referred to our institution for an acute ischemic stroke of the right posterior cerebral artery (PCA) territory with fluctuant mild left ataxic hemiparesis and left superior quadranopsia (NIHSS 4), that was treated by i.v. fibrinolysis. Anamnesis revealed hypertension under treatment and current smoking. No other pathologies in the clinical history had been reported. MRI showed ischemic thalamic and temporal lesions, occlusion of the P2 segment of the right PCA and, as incidental findings, two aneurysms of medium and small size of the right supraclinoid ICA associated with a small aneurysm at the right MCA bifurcation. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was scheduled about 1 month later, after a complete recovery of the patient, in order to analyze properly the aneurysms. The larger one measured 10.6 × 10.2 mm, with a large neck (7.4 mm), and it was located on the superior wall of the supraclinoid ICA, the smaller other one (4.2 × 4.4 mm, neck 3 mm) was detected on the medial wall of the same segment. Furthermore, the 3D rotational acquisition (3DRA) showed a fenestration of the inferior wall of the supraclinoid ICA with part of the neck of the larger aneurysm implanted on the smaller branch of the fenestration (Fig. 1a–c). After multidisciplinary discussion, endovascular treatment (EVT) of the two carotid aneurysms was scheduled, and it was decided that because of its small size (3 × 2.5 mm), the unruptured MCA aneurysm should be left untreated and followed up. The intention-to-treat strategy was to coil the larger aneurysm and to deploy a Pipeline Flex FD stent (Medtronic, Irvine, California) covering the supraclinoid carotid segment in order to treat both aneurysms. Dual anti-platelet premedication (Clopidogrel + ASA 75/75 mg, standard protocol at our institution) was administered and an in vitro assessment of the platelet function was performed the day of the procedure, showing proper results according to our internal protocol (PFA inhibition P2Y12 > 300 s, cutoff 108 s).
Endovascular procedure and follow-up
EVT was performed under general anesthesia and through right femoral access. A long introducer sheath (Neuron Max; Penumbra Inc., Alameda, CA) was positioned in the right ICA, an intermediate catheter Sofia 6F (Microvention, Tustin, CA) was navigated until the cavernous segment of the ICA and a Marksman micro-catheter (Medtronic, Irvine, CA) was navigated to the middle cerebral artery passing through the larger limb of the ICA fenestration. Successively, a second co-axial system, with an Envoy 6F (Cordis, Miami Lakes, FL) guiding catheter, was placed in the right common carotid artery and an Echelon 10 (Medtronic, Irvine, CA) micro-catheter was used to reach the larger aneurysm. A Pipeline Flex FD stent 4 × 12 mm was deployed covering both aneurysmal necks after five coils (Target, Stryker, Fremont, CA) and Microplex 10, Microvention, Tustin, CA) had been placed through a “jailing” technique in the larger aneurysm in order to achieve partial occlusion and to encourage intra-saccular thrombosis (Fig. 1d). No intra-procedural complications were observed. MRI/MR-angiography and DSA were performed after 3 and 6 months respectively, and showed the complete occlusion of the two aneurysms and of the ICA fenestration, without any sign of in-stent myo-intimal hyperplasia or stenosis (Fig. 1e–f) and the patient had a total recovery with an uneventful follow-up (mRS0).
Discussion
The supraclinoid ICA fenestration (SIF) is considered an extremely rare congenital anomaly and etiology is not clearly understood. It is thought that, during the early embryonic stages (4 to 5 mm), there is a failure in the splitting of the terminal ICA segment into rostral and caudal divisions [2, 10, 16, 17]. Another possible mechanism of ICA fenestration is the persistence of the small plexiform channels temporarily connected between two intracranial primitive carotid arteries and separated by branching embryonic vessels at the 4- to 5-mm embryonic stage [10, 16]. The real incidence of intracranial fenestrations is unknown; however, Van Rooij et al. [17] reported an overall frequency of about 28% even if the authors estimate that 40% would be more realistic because of the limited sample of their study and also because 3D rotational angiography was not performed for all the arteries. In their paper, a SIF was observed in 2% of the cases.
Fenestrations and development of cerebral aneurysms
Most of the reported cases of SIF are associated with aneurysms, although fenestrations of other cerebral arteries seem to be more frequent and not necessarily associated with other malformative lesions [1]. Van Rooij et al. [17] and Bharatha et al. [2] showed no significant difference in the incidence of aneurysms among fenestrated and non-fenestrated arteries; however, other authors [10, 14, 17] supported the hypothesis of a possible major predisposition for the aneurysmal development in some particular localizations, such as the supraclinoid ICA and the vertebro-basilar junction. Intracranial arterial fenestrations were investigated also in histological studies [6] which evoked the presence of some defects of the medial layer at both proximal and distal edges of all the fenestrations that could predispose to aneurysm formation.
Treatment of associated aneurysms and review of the literature
Almost all the aneurysms described in the previous reports were treated either by microsurgery or by EVT. We exhaustively reviewed the literature (Table 1) describing the cases of supraclinoid ICA fenestrations from 1984 to 2017 and included 20 reported cases (including our patient) of SIFs with or without associated aneurysms, distinguishing those ones located at the level of the fenestration and those located elsewhere, their size, the treatment, and the clinical outcome. Among them, 15 patients (15/20, 75%) harbored 18 aneurysms associated with a SIF, 4 of them being ruptured. The aneurysms were treated by clipping or wrapping in eight cases and by EVT in five patients with six aneurysms, while in another one, a conservative strategy was chosen. Dey et al. [4] reported two cases of aneurysms associated with SIF treated by clipping, and further reviewed 12 other patients with SIF from the literature. However, in three out of these reviewed cases, the SIF was not associated with an aneurysm [5, 7, 9], which could lead to an erroneous interpretation of the frequency of this association. Moreover, Dey et al. [4] claimed that the presence of a fenestration could make the endovascular treatment more challenging or not feasible without the sacrifice of the associated vessels. Our up-to-date review supports different considerations. Four cases of aneurysms located at the level of a SIF and successfully treated by embolization were reported by Nakiri et al. [10], Park et al. [13], and Ichikawa et al. [8]. Different techniques were used, including stent-assisted or balloon-assisted coiling and the use of a Trispan device (Boston Scientific). In our case, we decided to treat the two unruptured aneurysms by coiling the larger one and deploying a FD stent inside the larger limb of the SIF, in order to cover also the other aneurysmal neck. The present case and the others previously reported in literature [8, 10, 13] about the EVT of aneurysms associated with SIF suggested that this strategy could provide good anatomical and clinical results.
References
Banach MJ, Flamm ES (1993) Supraclinoid internal carotid artery fenestration with an associated aneurysm. Case Rep J Neurosurg 79(3):438–441
Bharatha A, Fox AJ, Aviv RI, Symons SP (2007) CT angiographic depiction of a supraclinoid ICA fenestration mimicking aneurysm, confirmed with catheter angiography. Surg Radiol Anat 29:317–321
Chen YY, Chang FC, Hu HH, Chao AC (2007) Fenestration of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery associated with aneurysm and ischemic stroke. Surg Neurol 68(Suppl 1(1)):S60–S63 discussion S63
Dey M, Awad IA (2011) Fenestration of supraclinoid internal carotid artery and associated aneurysm: embryogenesis, recognition, and management. World Neurosurg 76(6):592.e1–592.e5
Findlay JM, Chui M, Muller PJ (1987) Fenestration of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery. Can J Neurol Sci 14(2):159–161
Finlay HM, Canham PB (1994) The layered fabric of cerebral artery fenestrations. Stroke 25:1799–1806
Hattori T, Kobayashi H (1992) Fenestration of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery associated with carotid bifurcation aneurysm. Surg Neurol 37(4):284–288
Ichikawa T, Miyachi S, Izumi T, Matsubara N, Naito T, Haraguchi K, Wakabayashi T, Koketsu N (2011) Fenestration of a supraclinoid internal carotid artery associated with dual aneurysms: case report. Neurosurgery 69:E1005–E1009
Katsuta T, Matsubara T, Fujii K (1993) Fenestration of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery. Neuroradiology 35(6):461
Nakiri GS, Bravo E, Al-Khawaldeh M, Rivera R, Badilla L, Mounayer C (2012) Endovascular treatment of aneurysm arising from fenestration of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery: two case reports. J Neuroradiol 39:195–199
Ng PP, Steinfort B, Stoodley MA (2006) Internal carotid artery fenestration with dual aneurysms. Case Illustration J Neurosurg 104(6):979
Onoda K, Ono S, Tokunaga K, Sugiu K, Date I (2008) Fenestration of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery with associated aneurysm. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 48(3):118–120
Park SH, Lee CY (2012) Supraclinoid internal carotid artery fenestration harboring an unruptured aneurysm and another remote ruptured aneurysm: case report and review of the literature. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg 14(4):295–299
Plumb AA, Herwadkar A, Pickett G (2010) Incidental finding of fenestration of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery with appearances on magnetic resonance angiography. Surg Radiol Anat 32(2):165–169
Takano S, Saitoh M, Miyasaka Y, Yada K, Takagi H (1991) Fenestration of the intracranial internal carotid artery-case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 31(11):740–742
Uchino A, Tanaka M (2016) Fenestration of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery arising from the paraclinoid aneurysmal dilatation and fusing with the origin of the posterior communicating artery: a case report. Surg Radiol Anat Published Online. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-016-1753-3
Van Rooij SBT, Van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, Sprengers MES (2009) Fenestrations of intracranial arteries detected with 3D rotational angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:1347–1350
Yock DH Jr (1984) Fenestration of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery with rupture of associated aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 5(5):634–636
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The patient has consented to submission of this case report to the journal.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sgreccia, A., Coskun, O., Di Maria, F. et al. Fenestration of the supraclinoid segment of the ICA and associated aneurysms: a case report with literature review. Acta Neurochir 160, 1143–1147 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3551-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3551-7