The proof of theorem 1 is based on Galerkin method. Hence, we need a basis of the spaces \(\mathcal {V}^{1}\) and \(\dot{\mathcal {V}}_{{\text {div}}}^{1}\). Let \(\{ w_{i}\}_{i\in \mathbb {N}}\) be a system of eigenfunctions of Stokes operator in \(\dot{\mathcal {V}}_{{\text {div}}}^{1}\), which is complete and orthogonal in \(\dot{\mathcal {V}}_{{\text {div}}}^{1}\) and orthonormal in \(L^{2}(\Omega )\) (see chap. II.6 in [10]). In particular, \(\{ w_{i} \}_{i\in \mathbb {N}}\) are smooth (see formula (6.17), chap. II in [10]). By \(\{ \lambda _{i} \}_{i\in \mathbb {N}}\) we denote the corresponding system of eigenvalues. Similarly, let \(\{ z_{i} \}_{i\in \mathbb {N}}\) be an complete and orthogonal system in \(\mathcal {V}^{1}\), which is orthonormal in \(L^{2}(\Omega )\), which is obtained by taking eigenvectors of the minus Laplace operator. The system of corresponding eigenvalues is denoted by \(\{ \tilde{\lambda }_{i} \}_{i\in \mathbb {N}}\). We shall find approximate solutions of (18–20) in the following form
$$\begin{aligned} v^{l}(t, x)= \sum _{i=1}^{l} c_{i}^{l}(t)w_{i}(x), \omega ^{l}(t, x)= \sum _{i=1}^{l} e_{i}^{l}(t)z_{i}(x), b^{l}(t, x)= \sum _{i=1}^{l} d_{i}^{l}(t)z_{i}(x). \nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(24)
We have to determine the coefficients \(\{ c_{i}^{l}\}_{i=1}^{l}\), \(\{ e_{i}^{l}\}_{i=1}^{l}\) and \(\{ d_{i}^{l}\}_{i=1}^{l}\). In order to define an approximate problem we have to introduce a few auxiliary functions. For fixed \(t>0\) we denote by \(\Psi _{t}= \Psi _{t}(x)\) a smooth function such that
$$\begin{aligned} \Psi _{t}(x)= \left\{ \begin{array}{lll} \frac{1}{2}b_{\min }^{t}&{} \text{ for } &{} x<\frac{1}{2}b_{\min }^{t}, \\ x &{} \text{ for } &{} x\ge b_{\min }^{t},\\ \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}$$
(25)
where \(b_{\min }^{t}\) is defined by (13). We assume that the function \(\Psi _{t}\) also satisfies
$$\begin{aligned} 0\le \Psi _{t}'(x)\le c_{0}, |\Psi _{t}''(x)|\le c_{0} (b_{\min }^{t})^{-1}, \end{aligned}$$
(26)
where, here and \(c_{0}\) is a constant independent on x and t (see in the appendix for details (formula 107). We also need smooth functions \(\Phi _{t}\), \(\psi _{t}\) and \(\phi _{t}\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} \Phi _{t}(x)= & {} \left\{ \begin{array}{rll} \frac{1}{2}\omega _{\min }^{t}&{} \text{ for } &{} x< \frac{1}{2}\omega _{\min }^{t},\\ x &{} \text{ for } &{} x \in [ \omega _{\min }^{t}, \omega _{\max }^{t}], \\ 2\omega _{\max }^{t}&{} \text{ for } &{} x > 2\omega _{\max }^{t},\\ \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}$$
(27)
$$\begin{aligned} \psi _{t}(x)= & {} \left\{ \begin{array}{rll} 0 &{} \text{ for } &{} x<\frac{1}{2}b_{\min }^{t}, \\ x &{} \text{ for } &{} x \ge b_{\min }^{t},\\ \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}$$
(28)
$$\begin{aligned} \phi _{t}(x)= & {} \left\{ \begin{array}{rll} 0 &{} \text{ for } &{} x< \frac{1}{2}\omega _{\min }^{t},\\ x &{} \text{ for } &{} x\ge \omega _{\min }^{t}.\\ \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}$$
(29)
We assume that these functions additionally satisfy
$$\begin{aligned}&0\le \Phi _{t}'(x)\le c_{0}, |\Phi _{t}''(x)|\le c_{0} (\omega _{\min }^{t})^{-1}, \end{aligned}$$
(30)
$$\begin{aligned}&\psi _{t}(x)\le x \text{ for } x\ge 0 , 0\le \psi _{t}'(x)\le c_{0} \text{ for } x\in \mathbb {R}, \end{aligned}$$
(31)
$$\begin{aligned}&\phi _{t}(x)\le x \text{ for } x\ge 0 , 0\le \phi _{t}'(x)\le c_{0} \text{ for } x\in \mathbb {R}, \end{aligned}$$
(32)
for some constant \(c_{0}\) (the construction of \(\Phi _{t}\), \(\psi _{t}\) and \(\phi _{t}\) are similar to argument from the appendix).
An approximate solution will be found in the form (24), where the coefficients \(\{ c_{i}^{l}\}_{i=1}^{l}\), \(\{ e_{i}^{l}\}_{i=1}^{l}\) and \(\{ d_{i}^{l}\}_{i=1}^{l}\) are determined by the following truncated system
$$\begin{aligned}&(\partial _{t}v^{l}, w_{i}) - (v^{l}\otimes v^{l},\nabla w_{i}) + \left( \mu ^{l}D(v^{l}), D(w_{i}) \right) = 0 , \end{aligned}$$
(33)
$$\begin{aligned}&(\partial _{t}\omega ^{l}, z_{i}) - (\omega ^{l}v^{l}, \nabla z_{i} ) + \left( \mu ^{l}\nabla \omega ^{l}, \nabla z_{i} \right) = - \kappa _{2}(\phi _{t}^{2}(\omega ^{l}), z_{i} ), \end{aligned}$$
(34)
$$\begin{aligned}&(\partial _{t}b^{l}, z_{i}) - (b^{l}v^{l}, \nabla z_{i} ) + \left( \mu ^{l}\nabla b^{l}, \nabla z_{i} \right) = - (\psi _{t}(b^{l})\phi _{t}( \omega ^{l}) , z_{i}) + ( \mu ^{l}|D(v^{l})|^{2}, z_{i}),\nonumber \\&c^{l}_{i}(0)= (v_{0},w_{i}), e^{l}_{i}(0)= (\omega _{0},z_{i}), d^{l}_{i}(0)= (b_{0},z_{i}), \end{aligned}$$
(35)
where \(i\in \{1,\dots , l \}\) and we denote
$$\begin{aligned} \mu ^{l}= \frac{\Psi _{t}(b^{l})}{\Phi _{t}(\omega ^{l})}. \end{aligned}$$
(36)
In the computations below, the exponent l systematically refers to this Galerkin approximation.
Remark 1
We emphasize that in order to control the second derivatives of approximated solutions we need the conditions (30–32). In particular, we can not apply piecewise linear functions.
Firstly, we note that \(\mu ^{l}\) is positive and then, by standard ODE theory the system (33–35) has a local-in-time solution. Now, we shall obtain an estimate independent on l.
Lemma 1
The approximate solutions obtained above satisfies the following estimates
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{d}{dt}\Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + 2\mu ^{t}_{\min }\Vert D(v^{l}) \Vert _{2}^{2}\le 0, \end{aligned}$$
(37)
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{d}{dt}\Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + 2\mu ^{t}_{\min }\Vert \nabla \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2}\le 0 , \end{aligned}$$
(38)
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{d}{dt}\Vert b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + 2\mu ^{t}_{\min }\Vert \nabla b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2}\le 2\Vert b^{l} \Vert _{\infty } \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{\infty } \Vert \nabla v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2}, \end{aligned}$$
(39)
where \(\mu ^{t}_{\min }\) is defined by (13).
Proof
We multiply (33) by \(c_{i}^{l}\), sum over i and we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + (\mu ^{l}D(v^{l}), D(v^{l}))=0, \end{aligned}$$
where we used (24). Applying the properties of functions \(\Psi _{t}\), \(\Phi _{t}\) and (13) we get
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \mu ^{t}_{\min }\Vert D(v^{l}) \Vert _{2}^{2}\le 0. \end{aligned}$$
(40)
Similarly, we multiply (34) by \(e_{i}^{l}\) and we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + (\mu ^{l}\nabla \omega ^{l}, \nabla \omega ^{l}) = - \kappa _{2}(\phi _{t}^{2}(\omega ^{l}), \omega ^{l}). \end{aligned}$$
By the properties of \(\phi _{t}\) the right-hand side is non-positive thus, we obtain (38). Finally, after multiplying (35) by \(d_{i}^{l}\) we get
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + (\mu ^{l}\nabla b^{l}, \nabla b^{l})= - (\psi _{t}(b^{l})\phi _{t}(\omega ^{l}), b^{l}) + (\mu ^{l}|D(v^{l})|^{2}, b^{l}). \end{aligned}$$
We note that \(\psi _{t}(b^{l})\phi _{t}(\omega ^{l}) b^{l}\ge 0\) hence, we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \mu ^{t}_{\min }\Vert \nabla b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le (\mu ^{l}|D(v^{l})|^{2}, b^{l}) \le \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{\infty } \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{\infty } \Vert \nabla v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \end{aligned}$$
and the proof is finished. \(\square \)
We also need the higher order estimates.
Lemma 2
There exist positive \(t^{*}\) and \(C_{*}\), which depend on \(b_{\min }\), \(\omega _{\min }\), \(\omega _{\max }\), \(\Omega \), \(\kappa _{2}\), \(c_{0}\), \(\Vert v_{0} \Vert _{2,2} \), \(\Vert \omega _{0} \Vert _{2,2} \) and \(\Vert b_{0} \Vert _{2,2} \) such that for each \(l\in \mathbb {N}\) the following estimate
$$\begin{aligned}&\Vert v^{l}, \omega ^{l}, b^{l}\Vert _{L^{\infty }(0, t^{*}; H^{2}(\Omega ))}+\Vert v^{l}, \omega ^{l}, b^{l}\Vert _{L^{2}(0,t^{*};H^{3}(\Omega ))} \nonumber \\&\quad + \Vert \partial _{t}v^{l}, \partial _{t}\omega ^{l}, \partial _{t}b^{l}\Vert _{L^{2}(0,t^{*};H^{1}(\Omega ))} \le C_{*}\end{aligned}$$
(41)
holds.
Furthermore, for each positive \(\delta \) and compact \(K\subseteq \{ (a,b,c): 0<a\le b, 0<c \}\) there exists positive \(t^{*}_{K,\delta }\), which depends only on \(\kappa _{2}, \Omega , \delta \) and K such that if
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert v_{0} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} +\Vert \omega _{0} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} +\Vert b_{0} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} \le \delta \text{ and } (\omega _{\min }, \omega _{\max }, b_{\min })\in K, \end{aligned}$$
(42)
then \(t^{*}\ge t^{*}_{K,\delta }\).
Before we go to the proof of Lemma 2 we present its idea. First, we test the equation for approximate solution by its bi-Laplacian. Next, after integration by parts we obtain (43), (45) and (46). Further, we apply the lower bound for the ”diffusive coefficient” \(\mu ^{l}\) (see 48) and use the Hölder and Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequalities which leads to (60). To estimate the \(H^{2}\)-norm of \(\mu ^{l}\) we use the properties of \(\Psi _{t}\) and \(\Phi _{t}\). After applying the energy estimates from Lemma 1 we obtain (71), which leads to a uniform bound of the \(H^{2}\)-norm of the sequence of approximate solution on the interval \((0,t^{*})\) for some positive \(t^{*}\) (see 75). Immediately it gives a bound in \(L^{2}H^{3}\). The last step is the l-independent estimate of the time derivative of the approximate solution.
Proof
We multiply the equality (33) by \(\lambda _{i}^{2}c_{i}^{l}\) and sum over i
$$\begin{aligned} (\partial _{t}v^{l}, \Delta ^{2}v^{l}) - (v^{l}\otimes v^{l}, \nabla \Delta ^{2}v^{l})+ (\mu ^{l}D(v^{l}), D(\Delta ^{2}v^{l}))=0. \end{aligned}$$
After integrating by parts we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} (\partial _{t}v^{l}, \Delta ^{2}v^{l})= & {} \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert \Delta v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2}, \\ (v^{l}\otimes v^{l}, \nabla \Delta ^{2}v^{l})= & {} ( \Delta (v^{l}\otimes v^{l}) , \nabla \Delta v^{l}), \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned} (\mu ^{l}D(v^{l}), D(\Delta ^{2}v^{l}))= & {} ( \Delta \mu ^{l}D(v^{l}), \Delta D(v^{l})) \\&+ 2 (\nabla \mu ^{l}\cdot \nabla D(v^{l}),\Delta D(v^{l})) + (\mu ^{l}\Delta D(v^{l}),\Delta D(v^{l})). \end{aligned}$$
Thus, we get
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert \Delta v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} {+} \int _{\Omega }\mu ^{l}|\Delta D(v^{l})|^{2}dx= & {} {-}( \Delta (v^{l}\otimes v^{l}) , \nabla \Delta v^{l}) {-} ( \Delta \mu ^{l}D(v^{l}), \Delta D(v^{l})) \\&- 2 (\nabla \mu ^{l}\cdot \nabla D(v^{l}),\Delta D(v^{l})). \end{aligned}$$
We estimate the right-hand side
$$\begin{aligned} |( \Delta (v^{l}\otimes v^{l}) , \nabla \Delta v^{l}) |\le \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{\infty } \Vert \nabla ^{2}v^{l} \Vert _{2} \Vert \nabla ^{3}v^{l} \Vert _{2} + \Vert \nabla v^{l} \Vert _{4}^{2} \Vert \nabla ^{3}v^{l} \Vert _{2} . \end{aligned}$$
Proceeding analogously we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}&\Vert \Delta v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \int _{\Omega }\mu ^{l}| \Delta D(v^{l})|^{2}dx \nonumber \\&\quad \le \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{\infty } \Vert \nabla ^{2}v^{l} \Vert _{2} \Vert \nabla ^{3}v^{l} \Vert _{2} + \Vert \nabla v^{l} \Vert _{4}^{2} \Vert \nabla ^{3}v^{l} \Vert _{2}\nonumber \\&\qquad + \Big ( \Vert \Delta \mu ^{l}D(v^{l}) \Vert _{2} + 2 \Vert \nabla \mu ^{l}\cdot \nabla D(v^{l}) \Vert _{2} \Big )\Vert \Delta D(v^{l}) \Vert _{2}. \end{aligned}$$
(43)
Now, we multiply the Eq. (34) by \(\tilde{\lambda }_{i}^{2} e_{i}^{l}\) and we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} (\partial _{t}\omega ^{l}, \Delta ^{2}\omega ^{l}) - (\omega ^{l}v^{l}, \nabla \Delta ^{2}\omega ^{l}) + \left( \mu ^{l}\nabla \omega ^{l}, \nabla \Delta ^{2}\omega ^{l} \right) = - \kappa _{2}(\phi _{t}^{2}(\omega ^{l}), \Delta ^{2}\omega ^{l}). \end{aligned}$$
After integrating by parts we get
$$\begin{aligned} (\partial _{t}\omega ^{l}, \Delta ^{2}\omega ^{l})&= \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert \Delta \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2}, \nonumber \\ (\omega ^{l}v^{l}, \nabla \Delta ^{2}\omega ^{l})&= (\Delta \omega ^{l}v^{l}, \nabla \Delta \omega ^{l})+ 2(\nabla v^{l}\nabla \omega ^{l}, \nabla \Delta \omega ^{l}) + (\omega ^{l}\Delta v^{l}, \nabla \Delta \omega ^{l}), \nonumber \\ \left( \mu ^{l}\nabla \omega ^{l}, \nabla \Delta ^{2}\omega ^{l} \right)&= \left( \Delta \mu ^{l}\nabla \omega ^{l}, \nabla \Delta \omega ^{l} \right) + 2 \left( \nabla ^{2}\omega ^{l}\nabla \mu ^{l}, \nabla \Delta \omega ^{l} \right) \nonumber \\&\quad + \left( \mu ^{l}\nabla \Delta \omega ^{l}, \nabla \Delta \omega ^{l} \right) , -(\phi _{t}^{2}(\omega ^{l}), \Delta ^{2}\omega ^{l})\nonumber \\&= 2 \left( \phi _{t}( \omega ^{l})\phi _{t}'( \omega ^{l})\nabla \omega ^{l}, \nabla \Delta \omega ^{l} \right) \end{aligned}$$
(44)
Thus, we may write
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}&\Vert \Delta \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \int _{\Omega }\mu ^{l}\left| \nabla \Delta \omega ^{l} \right| ^{2} dx \nonumber \\&\quad \le \left( \Vert \Delta \omega ^{l}v^{l} \Vert _{2}+ \Vert \nabla v^{l}\nabla \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2} +\Vert \omega ^{l}\Delta v^{l} \Vert _{2}+ \Vert \Delta \mu ^{l}\nabla \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2} \right. \nonumber \\&\qquad \left. + 2 \Vert \nabla ^{2}\omega ^{l}\nabla \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2} + 2\kappa _{2}\Vert \phi _{t}( \omega ^{l})\phi _{t}'( \omega ^{l})\nabla \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2} \right) \Vert \nabla \Delta \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}. \end{aligned}$$
(45)
Finally, after multiplying (35) by \(\tilde{\lambda }^{2}_{i}d_{i}^{l}\) we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} (\partial _{t}b^{l}, \Delta ^{2}b^{l}) - (b^{l}v^{l}, \Delta ^{2}\nabla b^{l}) + \left( \mu ^{l}\nabla b^{l}, \nabla \Delta ^{2}b^{l} \right) \\ = - (\psi _{t}(b^{l})\phi _{t}( \omega ^{l}) , \Delta ^{2}b^{l}) + ( \mu ^{l}|D(v^{l})|^{2}, \Delta ^{2}b^{l}). \end{aligned}$$
We deal with the terms on the left hand-side as earlier and for the right-hand side terms we get
$$\begin{aligned} {-}(\psi _{t}(b^{l})\phi _{t}( \omega ^{l}) , \Delta ^{2}b^{l})&\,= \,\left( \psi _{t}'( b^{l})\phi _{t}( \omega ^{l})\nabla b^{l}, \nabla \Delta b^{l}\right) {+} \left( \psi _{t}( b^{l})\phi _{t}'( \omega ^{l})\nabla \omega ^{l}, \nabla \Delta b^{l}\right) ,\\ ( \mu ^{l}|D(v^{l})|^{2}, \Delta ^{2}b^{l})&\,=\, {-}(|D(v^{l})|^{2}\nabla \mu ^{l}, \nabla \Delta b^{l}) - (\mu ^{l}\nabla (|D(v^{l})|^{2}) , \nabla \Delta b^{l}). \end{aligned}$$
Therefore, we obtain the inequality
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert \Delta b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2}&+ \int _{\Omega }\mu ^{l}\left| \nabla \Delta b^{l} \right| ^{2} dx \le \Big ( \Vert \Delta b^{l}v^{l} \Vert _{2}+ 2\Vert \nabla v^{l}\nabla b^{l} \Vert _{2} + \Vert b^{l}\Delta v^{l} \Vert _{2} \nonumber \\&\quad + \Vert \Delta \mu ^{l}\nabla b^{l} \Vert _{2} + 2\Vert \nabla ^{2}b^{l}\nabla \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2} + \Vert \phi _{t}( \omega ^{l})\psi _{t}'( b^{l})\nabla b^{l} \Vert _{2}\nonumber \\&\quad + \Vert \psi _{t}( b^{l})\phi _{t}'( \omega ^{l})\nabla \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2} + \Vert \nabla \mu ^{l}\left| D(v^{l}) \right| ^{2} \Vert _{2}\nonumber \\&\quad + \Vert \mu ^{l}|D(v^{l})| |\nabla D(v^{l})| \Vert _{2} \Big ) \Vert \nabla \Delta b^{l} \Vert _{2}.\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(46)
We note that
$$\begin{aligned} \int _{\Omega }\left| \Delta D(v^{l}) \right| ^{2} dx = \frac{1}{2} \int _{\Omega }\left| \nabla ^{3}v^{l} \right| ^{2} dx. \end{aligned}$$
(47)
Indeed, integrating by parts yield
$$\begin{aligned}&2\int _{\Omega }\left| \Delta D(v^{l}) \right| ^{2} dx = \sum _{k,m}\int _{\Omega }\left| \Delta v^{l}_{k,x_{m}} \right| ^{2} dx + \int _{\Omega }\Delta v^{l}_{k,x_{m}} \cdot \Delta v^{l}_{m,x_{k}} dx \\&\quad =\sum _{k,m,p,q}\int _{\Omega }v^{l}_{k,x_{m}x_{p}x_{p}} \cdot v^{l}_{k,x_{m}x_{q}x_{q}} dx + \sum _{k,m,p,q}\int _{\Omega }\Delta v^{l}_{k,x_{k}} \cdot \Delta v^{l}_{m,x_{m}} dx \\&\quad =\sum _{k,m,p,q}\int _{\Omega }\left| v^{l}_{k,x_{m}x_{p}x_{q}} \right| ^{2} dx, \end{aligned}$$
where we applied the condition \({\text {div}}{ v^{l}} =0\) and used the tensor notation for components and derivatives. After applying (13), (25), (27) and (36) we get
$$\begin{aligned} \mu ^{t}_{\min }\le \mu ^{l} \end{aligned}$$
(48)
for each l thus, (43) together with (47) and (48) give
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{d}{dt}\Vert \Delta v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \mu ^{t}_{\min }\Vert \Delta D(v^{l}) \Vert _{2}^{2}\nonumber \\&\quad \le \frac{32}{\mu ^{t}_{\min }} \Big ( \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^{2} \Vert \nabla ^{2}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \Vert \nabla v^{l} \Vert _{4}^{4} + \Vert \Delta \mu ^{l}D(v^{l}) \Vert _{2}^{2} + \Vert \nabla \mu ^{l}\cdot \nabla D(v^{l}) \Vert _{2}^{2} \Big ). \nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(49)
Applying Gagliardo-Nirenberg interpolation inequality
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \nabla v^{l} \Vert _{\infty } \le C \Vert \nabla ^{3}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{\frac{1}{2}} \Vert \nabla v^{l} \Vert _{6}^{\frac{1}{2}} \end{aligned}$$
(50)
and Sobolev embedding inequality we get
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \Delta \mu ^{l}D(v^{l}) \Vert _{2}^{2} \le \Vert \Delta \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \Vert D(v^{l}) \Vert _{\infty }^{2} \le C \Vert \nabla ^{3}v^{l} \Vert _{2} \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} , \end{aligned}$$
where C depends only on \(\Omega \). Again, by Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \nabla ^{2}v^{l} \Vert _{3} \le C \Vert \nabla ^{3}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{\frac{1}{2}} \Vert \nabla ^{2}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{\frac{1}{2}} \end{aligned}$$
(51)
and Hölder inequality we have
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \nabla \mu ^{l}\cdot \nabla D(v^{l}) \Vert _{2}^{2} \le \Vert \nabla \mu \Vert _{6}^{2}\Vert \nabla ^{2}v^{l} \Vert _{3}^{2} \le C \Vert \nabla ^{3}v^{l} \Vert _{2} \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} . \end{aligned}$$
Thus, applying after the Young inequality with exponents (2, 6, 3) we get
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \Delta \mu ^{l}D(v^{l}) \Vert _{2}^{2}+ \Vert \nabla \mu ^{l}\cdot \nabla D(v^{l}) \Vert _{2}^{2} \le \varepsilon \Vert \nabla ^{3}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2}+\frac{C}{\varepsilon } ( \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{6} + \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{6}), \end{aligned}$$
(52)
where \(\varepsilon >0\) and C depends only on \(\Omega \). Applying the above inequality and (47) in (49) we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d}{dt}\Vert \nabla ^{2}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \mu ^{t}_{\min }\Vert \nabla ^{3}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le \frac{C}{\mu ^{t}_{\min }} \Big ( \Vert v^{l}\Vert ^{4}_{2,2}+ (\mu ^{t}_{\min })^{-2}( \Vert v^{l}\Vert _{2,2}^{6}+ \Vert \mu ^{l}\Vert _{2,2}^{6}) \Big ),\quad \end{aligned}$$
(53)
where \(C=C(\Omega )\). Now, we proceed similarly with (45) and we obtain
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{d}{dt}\Vert \Delta \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \mu ^{t}_{\min }\Vert \nabla \Delta \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le \frac{C}{\mu ^{t}_{\min }} \Big ( \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^{2} \Vert \nabla ^{2}\omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \Vert \nabla v^{l} \Vert _{4}^{2} \Vert \nabla \omega ^{l} \Vert _{4}^{2}\nonumber \\&\quad + \Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^{2} \Vert \nabla ^{2}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} +\Vert \Delta \mu ^{l}\nabla \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \Vert \nabla ^{2}\omega ^{l}\nabla \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \kappa _{2}^{2} c_{0}^{2} \Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^{2} \Vert \nabla \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \Big ),\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(54)
where we applied (32). We repeat the reasoning leading to (52) and we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \Delta \mu ^{l}\nabla \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \Vert \nabla ^{2}\omega ^{l}\nabla \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le \varepsilon \Vert \nabla ^{3}\omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2}+\frac{C}{\varepsilon } ( \Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{6} + \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{6}). \end{aligned}$$
Thus, the above inequality and (54) give
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{d}{dt}\Vert \nabla ^{2}\omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \mu ^{t}_{\min }\Vert \nabla ^{3}\omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2}\nonumber \\&\quad \le \frac{C}{\mu ^{t}_{\min }} \Big ( \Vert v^{l}\Vert _{2,2}^{4}+ (1+\kappa _{2}^{4}c_{0}^{4} ) \Vert \omega ^{l}\Vert _{2,2}^{4} + (\mu ^{t}_{\min })^{-2}( \Vert \omega ^{l}\Vert _{2,2}^{6}+ \Vert \mu ^{l}\Vert _{2,2}^{6}) \Big ),\qquad \end{aligned}$$
(55)
where \(C=C(\Omega )\). Further, from (46) we get
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{d}{dt}\Vert \Delta b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \mu ^{t}_{\min }\Vert \nabla \Delta b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le \frac{C}{\mu ^{t}_{\min }} \Big ( \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^{2} \Vert \nabla ^{2}b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \Vert \nabla v^{l} \Vert _{4}^{2} \Vert \nabla b^{l} \Vert _{4}^{2}\\&\quad + \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^{2} \Vert \nabla ^{2}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \Vert \nabla ^{2}\mu ^{l}\nabla b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \Vert \nabla ^{2}b^{l}\nabla \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + c_{0}^{2} \Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^{2} \Vert \nabla b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2}\\&\quad + c_{0}^{2} \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^{2} \Vert \nabla \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \Vert \nabla \mu ^{l}|D(v^{l})|^{2} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \Vert \mu ^{l}\nabla (|D(v^{l})|^{2}) \Vert _{2}^{2}\Big ), \end{aligned}$$
where we applied (31) and (32). Applying integrating by parts and Sobolev embedding theorem we get
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{d}{dt}\Vert \nabla ^{2}b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \mu ^{t}_{\min }\Vert \nabla ^{3}b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le \frac{C}{\mu ^{t}_{\min }} \Big ( \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{4}+ \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{4} + \Vert \nabla ^{2}\mu ^{l}\nabla b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2}\nonumber \\&\quad + \Vert \nabla ^{2}b^{l}\nabla \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + c_{0}^{4} \Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{4} +\Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{6} +\Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{6} + \Vert \nabla ^{2}v^{l} \Vert _{3}^{2} \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} \Big ),\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(56)
Applying again the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality and Young inequality we get
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \nabla ^{2}\mu ^{l}\nabla b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \Vert \nabla ^{2}b^{l}\nabla \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le \varepsilon \Vert \nabla ^{3}b^{l}\Vert _{2}^{2} + \frac{C}{\varepsilon }( \Vert b^{l}\Vert _{2,2}^{6}+ \Vert \mu ^{l}\Vert _{2,2}^{6}). \end{aligned}$$
From (51) we get
$$\begin{aligned}&\Vert \nabla ^{2}v^{l} \Vert _{3}^{2} \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2}\le C\Vert \nabla ^{3}v^{l} \Vert _{2}\Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{3} \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} \le \varepsilon \Vert \nabla ^{3}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2}\\&\quad +\frac{C}{\varepsilon }( \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{10}+ \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{10}). \end{aligned}$$
hence, from (56) we obtain the following estimate
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{d}{dt}\Vert \nabla ^{2}b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \mu ^{t}_{\min }\Vert \nabla ^{3}b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le \frac{C}{\mu ^{t}_{\min }} \Big ( \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{4}+ \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{4} + c_{0}^{4} \Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{4} +\Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{6}\nonumber \\&\quad +\Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{6} \Big ) +\frac{C}{(\mu ^{t}_{\min })^{3}} \Big ( \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{6}+ \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{6}+ \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{10}+ \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{10} \Big ) +\frac{\mu ^{t}_{\min }}{2} \Vert \nabla ^{3}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2},\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(57)
where \(C=C(\Omega )\). We sum the inequalities (53), (55), (57) and we obtain
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{d}{dt}\Big ( \Vert \nabla ^{2}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} +\Vert \nabla ^{2}\omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \Vert \nabla ^{2}b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \Big ) + \mu ^{t}_{\min }\Big ( \Vert \nabla ^{3}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} +\Vert \nabla ^{3}\omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \Vert \nabla ^{3}b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \Big )\nonumber \\&\quad \le \frac{C}{\mu ^{t}_{\min }} \Big ( \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{4}+ \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{4} + (1+c_{0}^{4}+c_{0}^{4}\kappa _{2}^{4}) \Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{4} +\Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{6} +\Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{6} \Big )\nonumber \\&\qquad +\frac{C}{(\mu ^{t}_{\min })^{3}} \Big ( \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{6}+ \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{6} + \Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{6} +\Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{6} +\Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{10}+\Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{10} \Big )\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(58)
for some C, which depends only on \(\Omega \). We note that
$$\begin{aligned} \mu ^{t}_{\min }= \frac{1}{4} \frac{b_{\min }}{\omega _{\max }}(1+\kappa _{2}\omega _{\max }t )^{1-\frac{1}{\kappa _{2}}} \end{aligned}$$
(59)
hence, we have
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{d}{dt}\Big ( \Vert \nabla ^{2}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} +\Vert \nabla ^{2}\omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \Vert \nabla ^{2}b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \Big ) + \mu ^{t}_{\min }\Big ( \Vert \nabla ^{3}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} +\Vert \nabla ^{3}\omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \Vert \nabla ^{3}b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \Big )\nonumber \\&\qquad \le C \left( \frac{\omega _{\max }}{b_{\min }}+ \left( \frac{\omega _{\max }}{b_{\min }} \right) ^{3} \right) \left( 1 + \kappa _{2}\omega _{\max }t \right) ^{\beta }\nonumber \\&\qquad \Big ( 1 + \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{6} + \Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{6} +\Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{10} +\Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{10} \Big ), \end{aligned}$$
(60)
where \(\beta = \max \{ \frac{1}{\kappa _{2}}-1, \frac{3}{\kappa _{2}}-3 \}\) and C depends only on \(\Omega \), \(c_{0}\) and \(\kappa _{2}\).
Now, we shall estimate \(\mu ^{l}\) in terms of \(\omega ^{l}\) and \(b^{l}\). Firstly, we note that from (25) and (27) we have
$$\begin{aligned} \Psi _{t}( b^{l})\le \max \left\{ \frac{1}{2}b_{\min }^{t}, b^{l}\right\} , \Phi _{t}( \omega ^{l})\ge \frac{1}{2}\omega _{\min }^{t}. \end{aligned}$$
(61)
Hence, by definition (36) we get
$$\begin{aligned} 0<\mu ^{l}\le 2 (\omega _{\min }^{t})^{-1}\max \{b_{\min }^{t}, b^{l}\}\le c_1(\Omega ) \frac{1}{\omega _{\min }} \left( 1 + \kappa _{2}\omega _{\min }t \right) \left( b_{\min }+ |b^{l}| \right) , \nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(62)
where \(c_{1}\) depends only on \(\Omega \). Thus, we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2} \le c_{1}\frac{1}{\omega _{\min }} \left( 1 + \kappa _{2}\omega _{\min }t \right) (b_{\min }+ \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{2}). \end{aligned}$$
(63)
Now, we have to estimate the derivatives of \(\mu ^{l}\). Direct calculation gives
$$\begin{aligned} | \nabla ^{2}\mu ^{l}|&= \left| \nabla ^{2} \left( \Psi _{t}( b^{l})\cdot (\Phi _{t}( \omega ^{l}))^{-1} \right) \right| \le (\Phi _{t}( \omega ^{l}))^{-1} \left| \nabla ^{2}(\Psi _{t}( b^{l})) \right| \nonumber \\&\quad +2(\Phi _{t}( \omega ^{l}))^{-2} \left| \nabla (\Psi _{t}( b^{l})) \right| \left| \nabla ( \Phi _{t}( \omega ^{l})) \right| \nonumber \\&\quad +2\Psi _{t}( b^{l})(\Phi _{t}( \omega ^{l}))^{-3} \left| \nabla ( \Phi _{t}( \omega ^{l})) \right| ^2 + \Psi _{t}( b^{l})(\Phi _{t}( \omega ^{l}))^{-2} \left| \nabla ^{2}( \Phi _{t}( \omega ^{l})) \right| .\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(64)
Using (26) and (30) we may estimate the derivatives
$$\begin{aligned} \left| \nabla (\Psi _{t}( b^{l})) \right| \le c_{0} \left| \nabla b^{l} \right| , \left| \nabla (\Phi _{t}( \omega ^{l})) \right| \le c_{0} \left| \nabla \omega ^{l} \right| , \end{aligned}$$
(65)
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{l} \left| \nabla ^{2}(\Psi _{t}( b^{l})) \right| \le c_{0}(b_{\min }^{t})^{-1}\left| \nabla b^{l} \right| ^{2} + c_{0} \left| \nabla ^{2}b^{l} \right| , \\ \left| \nabla ^{2}(\Phi _{t}( \omega ^{l})) \right| \le c_{0}(\omega _{\min }^{t})^{-1}\left| \nabla \omega ^{l} \right| ^{2} + c_{0} \left| \nabla ^{2}\omega ^{l} \right| . \end{array} \end{aligned}$$
(66)
If we apply estimates (61), (65) and (66) in (64) then we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \left| \nabla ^{2}\mu ^{l} \right|\le & {} c_{2} Q_{1} \left( 1+ \kappa _{2}\omega _{\max }t \right) ^{\max \{ 3, 1 + \frac{1}{\kappa _{2}} \} } \left[ \left| \nabla b^{l} \right| ^{2} + \left| \nabla ^{2}b^{l} \right| +|b^{l}| \left| \nabla \omega ^{l} \right| ^{2} \right. \nonumber \\&\left. + \left| \nabla b^{l} \right| + \left| \nabla \omega ^{l} \right| + \left| \nabla \omega ^{l} \right| ^{2} + \left| b^{l}\nabla ^{2}\omega ^{l} \right| + \left| \nabla ^{2}\omega ^{l} \right| \right] \end{aligned}$$
(67)
where \(c_{2}\) depends only on \(c_{0}\) and \(Q_{1}=\frac{b_{\min }}{\omega _{\min }} \left( 1+b_{\min }^{-3}+\omega _{\min }^{-3} \right) \). Thus, we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \nabla ^{2}\mu ^{l} \Vert _{2}\le & {} c_{2}Q_{1} \left( 1+ \kappa _{2}\omega _{\max }t \right) ^{\max \{ 3,1 + \frac{1}{\kappa _{2}} \} } \left[ \Vert \nabla b^{l} \Vert _{4}^{2} + \Vert \nabla ^{2}b^{l} \Vert _{2} \right. \nonumber \\&\left. + \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{\infty } \Vert \nabla \omega ^{l} \Vert _{4}^{2} + \Vert \nabla \omega ^{l} \Vert _{4}^{2} + \Vert \nabla ^{2}\omega ^{l} \Vert _{2} + \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{\infty } \Vert \nabla ^{2}\omega ^{l} \Vert _{2} \right] . \end{aligned}$$
(68)
If we take into account (63) then we get
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} \le c_{3} Q_{1} \left( 1+ \kappa _{2}\omega _{\max }t \right) ^{\max \{ 3,1 + \frac{1}{\kappa _{2}} \} } \left( \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{2,2}^{3} + \Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2,2}^{3} +1 \right) , \end{aligned}$$
(69)
where \(c_{3}=c_{3}( c_{0}, \Omega )\). Applying the above estimate in (60) we obtain
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{d}{dt}\Big ( \Vert \nabla ^{2}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} +\Vert \nabla ^{2}\omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \Vert \nabla ^{2}b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \Big ) + \mu ^{t}_{\min }\Big ( \Vert \nabla ^{3}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} +\Vert \nabla ^{3}\omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + \Vert \nabla ^{3}b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \Big )\nonumber \\&\quad \le C Q_{2} \left( 1+ \kappa _{2}\omega _{\max }t \right) ^{\bar{\beta } } \Big ( 1+ \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2}+ \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} + \Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} \Big )^{15}, \end{aligned}$$
(70)
where
$$\begin{aligned} Q_{2}= & {} \left[ 1+ \left( \frac{\omega _{\max }}{b_{\min }} \right) ^{3} \right] \left[ \frac{b_{\min }}{\omega _{\min }}(1+b_{\min }^{-3} +\omega _{\min }^{-3} )^{10} +1\right] , \bar{\beta }\\= & {} 10\max \left\{ 1+\frac{1}{\kappa _{2}},3\right\} +\beta \end{aligned}$$
and C depends only on \(\Omega \), \(c_{0}\) and \(\kappa _{2}\). If we take into account the estimates (37–39) then we have
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{d}{dt}\Big ( \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} +\Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} + \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} \Big ) + \mu ^{t}_{\min }\Big ( \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{3,2}^{2} +\Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{3,2}^{2} + \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{3,2}^{2} \Big )\nonumber \\&\quad \le C Q_{3} \left( 1+ \kappa _{2}\omega _{\max }t \right) ^{\bar{\beta } } \Big ( 1+ \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2}+ \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} + \Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} \Big )^{15}, \end{aligned}$$
(71)
where \(C=C( c_{0}, \Omega , \kappa _{2} )\) and \(Q_{3}=Q_{1}^{2}+Q_{2}+1\). If we divide both sides by the last term and next integrate with respect time variable then we get
$$\begin{aligned}&\Big ( 1+ \Vert v^{l}(t) \Vert _{2,2} ^{2}+ \Vert b^{l}(t) \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} + \Vert \omega ^{l}(t) \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} \Big )^{-14} \ge \Big ( 1+ \Vert v^{l}(0) \Vert _{2,2} ^{2}\nonumber \\&\qquad + \Vert b^{l}(0) \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} + \Vert \omega ^{l}(0) \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} \Big )^{-14} - \frac{14CQ_{3}}{(\bar{\beta }+1) \kappa _{2}\omega _{\max }} \left( (1+\kappa _{2}\omega _{\max }t )^{\bar{\beta }+1} -1 \right) \nonumber \\&\quad \ge \Big ( 1+ \Vert v_{0} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2}+ \Vert b_{0} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} + \Vert \omega _{0} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} \Big )^{-14} - \frac{14CQ_{3}}{(\bar{\beta }+1) \kappa _{2}\omega _{\max }} \left( (1+\kappa _{2}\omega _{\max }t )^{\bar{\beta }+1} -1 \right) ,\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(72)
where the last estimate is a consequence of Bessel inequality. Now, we define time \(t^{*}\) as the unique solution of the equality
$$\begin{aligned} \Big ( 1+ \Vert v_{0} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2}+ \Vert b_{0} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} + \Vert \omega _{0} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} \Big )^{-14} = \frac{15CQ_{3}}{(\bar{\beta }+1) \kappa _{2}\omega _{\max }} \left( (1+\kappa _{2}\omega _{\max }t^{*})^{\bar{\beta }+1} -1 \right) .\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(73)
We note that \(t^{*}\) is positive and depends on \(\Vert v_{0} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2}+ \Vert b_{0} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} + \Vert \omega _{0} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2}\), \(\kappa _{2}\), \(\Omega \), \(c_{0}\), \(\omega _{\min }\), \(\omega _{\max }\) and \(b_{\min }\). It is evident that \(t^{*}\) is decreasing function of \(\Vert v_{0} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2}+ \Vert b_{0} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} + \Vert \omega _{0} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} \). Moreover, for any \(\delta >0\) and compact \(K\subseteq \{(a,b,c): 0<a\le b, 0<c \}\) there exists \(t^{*}_{K,\delta }>0\) such that \(t^{*}\ge t^{*}_{K,\delta }\) for any initial data satisfying \(\Vert v_{0} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2}+ \Vert b_{0} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} + \Vert \omega _{0} \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} \le \delta \) and \((\omega _{\min }, \omega _{\max }, b_{\min })\in K\). From (73) we deduce that \(t^{*}_{K,\delta }\) depends only on \(\delta \), K, \(\Omega \) \(\kappa _{2}\) and \( c_{0}\).
From (72) and (73) we have
$$\begin{aligned} \Big ( 1+ \Vert v^{l}(t) \Vert _{2,2} ^{2}+ \Vert b^{l}(t) \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} + \Vert \omega ^{l}(t) \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} \Big )^{-14} \ge \frac{CQ_{3}}{(\bar{\beta }+1) \kappa _{2}\omega _{\max }} \left( (1+\kappa _{2}\omega _{\max }t )^{\bar{\beta }+1} -1 \right) \end{aligned}$$
for \(t\in [0,t^{*}]\) hence,
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert v^{l}(t) \Vert _{2,2} ^{2}+ \Vert b^{l}(t) \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} + \Vert \omega ^{l}(t) \Vert _{2,2} ^{2} \le \left[ \frac{CQ_{3}}{(\bar{\beta }+1) \kappa _{2}\omega _{\max }} \left( (1+\kappa _{2}\omega _{\max }t^{*})^{\bar{\beta }+1} -1 \right) \right] ^{-\frac{1}{14}}\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(74)
for \(t\in [0,t^{*}]\). In particular, there exists \(C^{*}=C^{*}(t^{*})\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert v^{l}\Vert _{L^{\infty }(0, t^{*}; \dot{\mathcal {V}}_{{\text {div}}}^{2})}+\Vert \omega ^{l}\Vert _{L^{\infty }(0, t^{*}; \mathcal {V}^{2})}+ \Vert b^{l}\Vert _{L^{\infty }(0, t^{*}; \mathcal {V}^{2})} \le C^{*}\end{aligned}$$
(75)
uniformly with respect to \(l\in \mathbb {N}\). Next, from (59), (71) and (75) we get the bound
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert v^{l}\Vert _{L^{2}(0, t^{*}; \dot{\mathcal {V}}_{{\text {div}}}^{3})}+\Vert \omega ^{l}\Vert _{L^{2}(0, t^{*}; \mathcal {V}^{3})}+ \Vert b^{l}\Vert _{L^{2}(0, t^{*}; \mathcal {V}^{3})} \le C_{*}, \end{aligned}$$
(76)
where \(C_{*}\) depends on \(t^{*}, \kappa _{2}, \) \(b_{\min }\), \(\omega _{\max }\) and \(C^{*}\). It remains to show the estimate of time derivative of solution. We do this by multiplying the equality (33) by \(\frac{d}{dt}c_{i}^{l}\) and after summing it over i we get
$$\begin{aligned} (\partial _{t}v^{l}, \partial _{t}v^{l}) - (v^{l}\otimes v^{l}, \nabla \partial _{t}v^{l})+ (\mu ^{l}D(v^{l}), D(\partial _{t}v^{l}))=0. \end{aligned}$$
Thus, by after integration by parts and applying Hölder inequality we have
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \partial _{t}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le \Vert {\text {div}}(v^{l}\otimes v^{l}) \Vert _{2} \Vert \partial _{t}v^{l} \Vert _{2} + \Vert \nabla \left( \mu ^{l}D(v^{l}) \right) \Vert _{2} \Vert \partial _{t}v^{l} \Vert _{2}. \end{aligned}$$
By applying Young inequality we get
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \partial _{t}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le 2\Vert {\text {div}}(v^{l}\otimes v^{l}) \Vert _{2}^{2} + 2\Vert \nabla \left( \mu ^{l}D(v^{l}) \right) \Vert _{2}^{2} . \end{aligned}$$
Next, Hölder inequality gives us
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \partial _{t}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le C \Big ( \Vert \nabla v^{l} \Vert _{4}^{2} \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{4}^{2} + \Vert \nabla \mu ^{l} \Vert _{4}^{2} \Vert D(v^{l}) \Vert _{4}^{2} + \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^2 \Vert \nabla D(v^{l}) \Vert _{2}^{2} \Big ). \end{aligned}$$
Finally, Sobolev embedding theorem leads us to the following inequality
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \partial _{t}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le C \Big ( \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^4 + \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} \Big ), \end{aligned}$$
where C depends only on \(\Omega \). If we apply (69) and (75) then we get
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \partial _{t}v^{l}\Vert _{L^{\infty }(0,t^{*};L^{2}(\Omega ))} \le C_{*}, \end{aligned}$$
(77)
where \(C_{*}\) depends on \(\Omega , c_{0}, t^{*}, \kappa _{2}, \) \(b_{\min }\), \(\omega _{\max }\) and \(C^{*}\).
Now, we shall consider (34). Proceeding as earlier we get
$$\begin{aligned}&\Vert \partial _{t}\omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le 4\Vert \nabla \omega ^{l}\cdot v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2}+ 4\Vert \nabla ( \mu ^{l}\nabla \omega ^{l}) \Vert _{2}^{2}+ 4\kappa _{2}\Vert \phi _{t}^{2} (\omega ^{l}) \Vert _{2}^{2} \\&\quad \le 4 \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^{2} \Vert \nabla \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + 8\Vert \nabla \mu ^{l} \Vert _{4}^{2} \Vert \nabla \omega ^{l} \Vert _{4}^{2} + 8\Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^{2} \Vert \nabla ^{2}\omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2}+ 4\kappa _{2}\Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{4}^{4}, \end{aligned}$$
where we applied (32). Thus, using (69) and (75) we get
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \partial _{t}\omega ^{l}\Vert _{L^{\infty }(0,t^{*};L^{2}(\Omega ))} \le C_{*}, \end{aligned}$$
(78)
where \(C_{*}\) is as earlier. It remains to deal with (35). In similar way we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \partial _{t}b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2}\le & {} 4\Vert \nabla b^{l}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + 4\Vert \nabla (\mu ^{l}\nabla b^{l}) \Vert _{2}^{2}+ 4\Vert \psi _{t}( b^{l})\phi _{t}( \omega ^{l}) \Vert _{2}^{2} + 4\Vert \mu ^{l}| D(v^{l})|^{2} \Vert _{2}^{2} \\\le & {} 4\Vert \nabla b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^{2} + 8\Vert \nabla \mu ^{l} \Vert _{4}^{2} \Vert \nabla b^{l} \Vert _{4}^{2} + 8\Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^{2}\Vert \nabla ^{2}b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2}\\&+ 4\Vert b^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^{2}\Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} + 4\Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^{2}\Vert \nabla v^{l} \Vert _{4}^{4}. \end{aligned}$$
Applying again (69) and (75) we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \partial _{t}b^{l}\Vert _{L^{\infty }(0,t^{*};L^{2}(\Omega ))} \le C_{*}, \end{aligned}$$
(79)
where \(C_{*}\) depends on \(\Omega , c_{0}, t^{*}, \kappa _{2}, \) \(b_{\min }\), \(\omega _{\max }\) and \(C^{*}\).
Now, we prove the higher order estimates for time derivative of approximate solution. Firstly, we multiply the equality (33) by \(-\lambda _{i} \frac{d}{dt}c_{i}^{l}\) and sum over i
$$\begin{aligned} (\partial _{t}v^{l}, -\Delta \partial _{t}v^{l}) + (v^{l}\otimes v^{l}, \nabla \Delta \partial _{t}v^{l})- (\mu ^{l}D(v^{l}), D(\Delta \partial _{t}v^{l}))=0. \end{aligned}$$
After integration by parts we get
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \nabla \partial _{t}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} = - \left( \Delta \left( v^{l}\otimes v^{l} \right) , \nabla \partial _{t}v^{l} \right) + \left( \Delta \left( \mu ^{l}D(v^{l}) \right) , D(\partial _{t}v^{l}) \right) . \end{aligned}$$
If we apply Hölder and Young inequalities, then we get
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \nabla \partial _{t}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le 2\Vert \Delta \left( v^{l}\otimes v^{l} \right) \Vert _{2}^2 + \Vert \Delta \left( \mu ^{l}D(v^{l}) \right) \Vert _{2}^2, \end{aligned}$$
where we used the equality \( 2\Vert D(\partial _{t}v^{l}) \Vert _{2}^{2} = \Vert \nabla \partial _{t}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \). We estimate further
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \nabla \partial _{t}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2}\le & {} 8\Vert v^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^2\Vert \nabla ^{2}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^2 + 8\Vert \nabla v^{l} \Vert _{4}^{4} + 4\Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^2 \Vert \Delta D(v^{l}) \Vert _{2}^2 \\&+ 16\Vert \nabla \mu ^{l} \Vert _{3}^2 \Vert \nabla D(v^{l}) \Vert _{6}^2 + 4\Vert \Delta \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2}^2 \Vert D(v^{l}) \Vert _{\infty }^2. \end{aligned}$$
Using Sobolev embedding we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \nabla \partial _{t}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le C \Big ( \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^4 + \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} + \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{3,2} ^2. \Big ), \end{aligned}$$
where C depends only on \(\Omega \). Applying (69), (75) and (76) we get
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \nabla \partial _{t}v^{l}\Vert _{L^{2}(0, t^{*}; L^{2}(\Omega )} \le C_{*}, \end{aligned}$$
(80)
where \(C_{*}\) depends on \(c_{0}, \Omega , t^{*}, \kappa _{2}, \) \(b_{\min }\), \(\omega _{\max }\) and \(C^{*}\). Proceeding analogously we get
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \nabla \partial _{t}\omega ^{l}\Vert _{L^{2}(0, t^{*}; L^{2}(\Omega ))} \le C_{*}. \end{aligned}$$
(81)
It remains to estimate \(\nabla \partial _{t}b^{l}\). If we multiply the equality (35) by \(-\tilde{\lambda }_{i} \frac{d}{dt}d_{i}^{l}\) and sum over i, then we get
$$\begin{aligned}&(\partial _{t}b^{l}, - \Delta \partial _{t}b^{l}) + (b^{l}v^{l}, \nabla \Delta \partial _{t}b^{l}) - \left( \mu ^{l}\nabla b^{l}, \nabla \Delta \partial _{t}b^{l} \right) \\&\quad = (\psi _{t}(b^{l})\phi _{t}( \omega ^{l}) , \Delta \partial _{t}b^{l}) - ( \mu ^{l}|D(v^{l})|^{2}, \Delta \partial _{t}b^{l}). \end{aligned}$$
Integrating by parts and Hölder inequality lead to
$$\begin{aligned}&\Vert \nabla \partial _{t}b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le \Vert \Delta \left( b^{l}v^{l} \right) \Vert _{2} \Vert \nabla \partial _{t}b^{l} \Vert _{2} + \Vert \Delta \left( \mu ^{l}\nabla b^{l} \right) \Vert _{2} \Vert \nabla \partial _{t}b^{l} \Vert _{2} \\&\quad +\Vert \nabla \left( \psi _{t}(b^{l})\phi _{t}( \omega ^{l}) \right) \Vert _{2} \Vert \nabla \partial _{t}b^{l} \Vert _{2} + \Vert \nabla \left( \mu ^{l}|D(v^{l})|^{2} \right) \Vert _{2} \Vert \nabla \partial _{t}b^{l} \Vert _{2}. \end{aligned}$$
After applying Young inequality we get
$$\begin{aligned}&\Vert \nabla \partial _{t}b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le 4 \Vert \Delta \left( b^{l}v^{l} \right) \Vert _{2}^2 + 4 \Vert \Delta \left( \mu ^{l}\nabla b^{l} \right) \Vert _{2}^2\\&\quad + 4 \Vert \nabla \left( \psi _{t}(b^{l})\phi _{t}( \omega ^{l}) \right) \Vert _{2}^2 + 4 \Vert \nabla \left( \mu ^{l}|D(v^{l})|^{2} \right) \Vert _{2}^2. \end{aligned}$$
Using Hölder inequality we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} \Vert \nabla \partial _{t}b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2}&\le 16 \Vert \Delta b^{l} \Vert _{2}^2 \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^2 + 32 \Vert \nabla b^{l} \Vert _{4}^2 \Vert \nabla v^{l} \Vert _{4}^2 + 16\Vert b^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^2 \Vert \nabla ^{2}v^{l} \Vert _{2}^2 \\&\quad + 16 \Vert \Delta \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2}^2 \Vert \nabla b^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^2 + 32 \Vert \nabla \mu ^{l} \Vert _{4}^2 \Vert \nabla ^{2}b^{l} \Vert _{4}^2 + 16 \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^2 \Vert \nabla \Delta b^{l} \Vert _{2}^2 \qquad \\&\quad + 8 \Vert \nabla ( \psi _{t}(b^{l})) \Vert _{2}^2\Vert \phi _{t}( \omega ^{l}) \Vert _{\infty }^2 + 8 \Vert \psi _{t}(b^{l}) \Vert _{\infty }^2\Vert \nabla ( \phi _{t}( \omega ^{l})) \Vert _{2}^2 \\&\quad + 8 \Vert \nabla \mu ^{l} \Vert _{6}^2 \Vert D(v^{l}) \Vert _{6}^4 + 16 \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{\infty }^2 \Vert D(v^{l}) \Vert _{3}^2\Vert \nabla D(v^{l}) \Vert _{6}^2. \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(82)
After applying (31) and (32) we get \(\Vert \psi _{t}(b^{l}) \Vert _{\infty } \le \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{\infty }\), \(\Vert \psi _{t}(\omega ^{l}) \Vert _{\infty } \le \Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{\infty }\) and
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \nabla (\phi _{t}(\omega ^{l})) \Vert _{2} = \Vert \phi _{t}'( \omega ^{l})\nabla \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2} \le c_0 \Vert \nabla \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}, \\ \Vert \nabla (\psi _{t}(\omega ^{l})) \Vert _{2} = \Vert \psi _{t}'( b^{l})\nabla \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2} \le c_0 \Vert \nabla b^{l} \Vert _{2}. \end{aligned}$$
Using these inequalities in (82) we obtain
$$\begin{aligned}&\Vert \nabla \partial _{t}b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le C \Big ( \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} + \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{3,2}^{2} + \Vert \nabla b^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \Vert \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} + \Vert \nabla \omega ^{l} \Vert _{2}^{2} \Vert b^{l} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} \\&\quad + \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2} ^4 + \Vert \mu ^{l} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{2,2}^{2} \Vert v^{l} \Vert _{3,2}^{2} \Big ), \end{aligned}$$
where \( C = C(\Omega ,c_0)\). Finally, from (69), (75) and (76) we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert \nabla \partial _{t}b^{l}\Vert _{L^{2}(0, t^{*}; L^{2}(\Omega ))} \le C_{*}, \end{aligned}$$
(83)
where \(C_{*}\) depends on \(c_{0}, \Omega , t^{*}, \kappa _{2}, \) \(b_{\min }\), \(\omega _{\max }\) and \(C^{*}\). The estimates (75–79), (80), (81) and (83) give (41) and the proof of lemma 2 is finished. \(\square \)
Now, we draw the idea of the remain part of the proof of theorem 1. From the l-independent estimate (41) we deduce the existence of a subsequence, which converges weakly in some spaces (see 84–85). Next, by applying Aubin-Lions lemma we get strong convergence of the approximate solution, see (87), (88). Further, we prove the convergence of ”diffusive coefficient” \(\mu ^{l}\) (89), which allows us to take the limit in the approximate problem. As a result, we obtain (91–93). In the last step we prove a series of inequalities (94–96), (98), (101), which show that the truncated problem is in fact the original one.
Having the estimate (41) from lemma 2 we may apply weak-compactness argument to the sequence of approximate solutions and we obtain a subsequence (still numerated by superscript l) weakly convergent in appropriate spaces. To be more precise, there exist v, \(\omega \) and b such that
$$\begin{aligned} v \in L^{2}(0,t^{*};\dot{\mathcal {V}}_{{\text {div}}}^{3})\cap L^{\infty }(0,t^{*};\dot{\mathcal {V}}_{{\text {div}}}^{2}), \partial _{t} v\in L^{2}(0,t^{*};H^{1}(\Omega )) \\ \omega , b \in L^{2}(0,t^{*};\mathcal {V}^{3})\cap L^{\infty }(0,t^{*};\mathcal {V}^{2}), \partial _{t} \omega , \partial _{t} b\in L^{2}(0,t^{*};H^{1}(\Omega )) \end{aligned}$$
and
$$\begin{aligned}&v^{l}\rightharpoonup v \text{ in } L^{2}(0,t^{*};\dot{\mathcal {V}}_{{\text {div}}}^{3}), v^{l}\overset{*}{\rightharpoonup }v \text{ in } L^{\infty }(0,t^{*};\dot{\mathcal {V}}_{{\text {div}}}^{2}), \partial _{t}v^{l}\rightharpoonup \partial _{t} v \text{ in } L^{2}(0,t^{*};H^{1}(\Omega )),\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(84)
$$\begin{aligned}&(\omega ^{l}, b^{l}) \rightharpoonup (\omega , b) \text{ in } L^{2}(0,t^{*};\mathcal {V}^{3}), (\omega ^{l}, b^{l}) \overset{*}{\rightharpoonup }(\omega , b ) \text{ in } L^{\infty }(0,t^{*};\mathcal {V}^{2}), \end{aligned}$$
(85)
$$\begin{aligned}&(\partial _{t}\omega ^{l}, \partial _{t}b^{l}) \rightharpoonup (\partial _{t} \omega , \partial _{t} b) \text{ in } L^{2}(0,t^{*};H^{1}(\Omega )). \end{aligned}$$
(86)
Thus, by the Aubin-Lions lemma there exists a subsequence (again denoted by l) such that
$$\begin{aligned} (v^{l}, \omega ^{l}, b^{l}) \longrightarrow (v, \omega , b ) \text{ in } L^{2}(0,t^{*};H^{s}(\Omega )) \text{ for } s< 3, \end{aligned}$$
(87)
and
$$\begin{aligned} (v^{l}, \omega ^{l}, b^{l}) \longrightarrow (v, \omega , b ) \text{ in } C([0,t^{*}];H^{q}(\Omega )) \text{ for } q < 2. \end{aligned}$$
(88)
Now, we characterize the limits of nonlinear terms. Firstly, we note that for fixed (x, t) we may write
$$\begin{aligned} \Psi _{t}(b^{l}(x,t)) - \Psi _{t}(b(x, t) )= \int _{0}^{1} \frac{d}{ds} \left[ \Psi _{t}\left( s b^{l}(x,t) +(1-s) b(x, t) \right) \right] ds \\ = \int _{0}^{1} \Psi _{t}' (s b^{l}(x,t ) +(1-s) b(x, t) ) ds \cdot [b^{l}(x,t)- b(x,t)]. \end{aligned}$$
Taking into account (26) we get
$$\begin{aligned} |\Psi _{t}(b^{l}(x,t)) - \Psi _{t}(b(x, t) )|\le c_{0} |b^{l}(x,t)- b(x,t)|. \end{aligned}$$
Similarly we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} |\Phi _{t}(\omega ^{l}(x,t)) - \Phi _{t}(\omega (x, t) )|\le c_{0} |\omega ^{l}(x,t)- \omega (x,t)|. \end{aligned}$$
and
$$\begin{aligned} |\Phi _{t}(b(x,t))| \le c_{0} (|b(x,t)|+ b_{\min }^{t}). \end{aligned}$$
Therefore, applying (27) we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \left| \frac{\Psi _{t}( b^{l})}{\Phi _{t}( \omega ^{l})}- \frac{\Psi _{t}( b)}{ \Phi _{t}( \omega ) }\right|\le & {} 4(\omega _{\min }^{t})^{-2}\left[ |\Phi _{t}( \omega ) | | \Psi _{t}( b^{l})- \Psi _{t}(b)|+ |\Psi _{t}(b )| |\Phi _{t}( \omega ) - \Phi _{t}( \omega ^{l})| \right] \\ {}\le & {} 4 (\omega _{\min }^{t})^{-2}\left[ 2 \omega _{\max }|b^{l}- b |+ c_{0} (|b|+ b_{\min }^{t})|\omega - \omega ^{l}| \right] . \end{aligned}$$
From (88) and the above estimate we have
$$\begin{aligned} \mu ^{l}\longrightarrow \mu _{\Psi _{t}\Phi _{t}}\equiv \frac{\Psi _{t}( b)}{ \Phi _{t}( \omega )} \text{ uniformly } \text{ on } \overline{\Omega } \times [0,t^{*}]. \end{aligned}$$
(89)
Now, we shall take the limit \(l\rightarrow \infty \) in the system (33–35). First, we multiply (33) by \(a_{i}\) and sum over \(i \in \{1,\dots , l \}\) and after integrating with respect time variable we get
$$\begin{aligned} \int _{0}^{t}(\partial _{t}v^{l}, w)dt - \int _{0}^{t}(v^{l}\otimes v^{l},\nabla w)dt + \int _{0}^{t} \left( \mu ^{l}D(v^{l}), D(w) \right) dt = 0, \end{aligned}$$
where \(w= \sum \limits _{i=1}^{l}a_{i}w_{i}\) and \(t\in (0,t^{*})\). We note that from (88) we have for some \( \lambda > 0\)
$$\begin{aligned} (v^{l}, \omega ^{l}, b^{l}) \longrightarrow (v, \omega , b ) \text{ in } C([0,t^{*}];C^{0,\lambda }(\overline{\Omega })) \end{aligned}$$
(90)
hence, (85), (88) and (89) imply that
$$\begin{aligned} \int _{0}^{t}(\partial _{t} v, w)dt - \int _{0}^{t}(v\otimes v,\nabla w)dt + \int _{0}^{t} \left( \mu _{\Psi _{t}\Phi _{t}}D(v), D(w) \right) dt = 0 \end{aligned}$$
for \(t\in (0,t^{*})\) and \(w= \sum \limits _{i=1}^{l}a_{i}w_{i}\). By density, the above identity holds for \(w\in \dot{\mathcal {V}}_{{\text {div}}}^{1}\). As a consequence, we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \int _{t_{1}}^{t_{2}} (\partial _{t} v, w)dt - \int _{t_{1}}^{t_{2}} (v\otimes v,\nabla w)dt + \int _{t_{1}}^{t_{2}} \left( \mu _{\Psi _{t}\Phi _{t}}D(v), D(w) \right) dt = 0 \end{aligned}$$
for \(0<t_{1}<t_{2}<t^{*}\) and \(w\in \dot{\mathcal {V}}_{{\text {div}}}^{1}\). After dividing both sides by \(|t_{2}-t_{1}|\) and taking the limit \(t_{2}\rightarrow t_{1}\) we get
$$\begin{aligned} (\partial _{t} v, w) - (v\otimes v,\nabla w) + \left( \mu _{\Psi _{t}\Phi _{t}}D(v), D(w) \right) =0 \text{ for } w\in \dot{\mathcal {V}}_{{\text {div}}}^{1}\end{aligned}$$
(91)
for a.a. \(t\in (0,t^{*})\). Further, we have
$$\begin{aligned} \psi _{t}( b^{l})\longrightarrow \psi _{t}( b), \phi _{t}( \omega ^{l})\longrightarrow \phi _{t}(\omega ^{l}) \text{ uniformly } \text{ on } \overline{\Omega } \times [0,t^{*}] \end{aligned}$$
thus, using (34) and (35) and arguing as earlier we obtain
$$\begin{aligned}&(\partial _{t} \omega , z) - (\omega v, \nabla z ) + \left( \mu _{\Psi _{t}\Phi _{t}}\nabla \omega , \nabla z \right) = - \kappa _{2}(\phi _{t}^{2}(\omega ), z ) \text{ for } z\in \mathcal {V}^{1}, \end{aligned}$$
(92)
$$\begin{aligned}&(\partial _{t} b, q) - (b v, \nabla q ) + \left( \mu _{\Psi _{t}\Phi _{t}}\nabla b, \nabla q \right) = - (\psi _{t}(b)\phi _{t}( \omega ) , q) + ( \mu _{\Psi _{t}\Phi _{t}}\left| D(v) \right| ^{2}, q) \nonumber \\&\text{ for } q\in \mathcal {V}^{1}\end{aligned}$$
(93)
for a.a. \(t\in (0,t^{*})\).
Now, we shall prove the bounds for b and \(\omega \). The proof is similar to one found in [8]. We denote by \(b_{+}\) (\(b_{-}\)) the positive (negative resp.) part of b. Then \(b=b_{+}+ b_{-}\). We shall show that
$$\begin{aligned} b\ge 0 \text{ in } \overline{\Omega } \times [0,t^{*}]. \end{aligned}$$
(94)
For this purpose we test the Eq. (93) by \(b_{-}\) and we obtain
$$\begin{aligned}&(\partial _{t} b, b_{-}) - (b v, \nabla b_{-}) + \left( \mu _{\Psi _{t}\Phi _{t}}\nabla b, \nabla b_{-} \right) \\&\quad = - (\psi _{t}(b)\phi _{t}( \omega ) , b_{-})+( \mu _{\Psi _{t}\Phi _{t}}\left| D(v) \right| ^{2}, b_{-}). \end{aligned}$$
We note that from (89) we have \(0\le \mu _{\Psi _{t}\Phi _{t}}\) and by (28) we obtain \(\psi _{t}(b)b_{-}\equiv 0\) thus, we get
$$\begin{aligned} ({\partial _{t} b_{-}}, b_{-}) - (b_{-}v, \nabla b_{-}) + \left( \mu _{\Psi _{t}\Phi _{t}}\nabla b_{-}, \nabla b_{-} \right) \le 0 \end{aligned}$$
and then
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d}{dt}\Vert b_{-} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le 0. \end{aligned}$$
By the assumption (11) the negative part of initial value of b is zero hence, \(b_{-}\equiv 0\) and we obtained (94).
Proceeding similarly we introduce the decomposition \(\omega = \omega _{+}+ \omega _{-}\) and test the Eq. (92) by \(\omega _{-}\)
$$\begin{aligned} (\partial _{t} \omega , \omega _{-}) - (\omega v, \nabla \omega _{-}) + \left( \mu _{\Psi _{t}\Phi _{t}}\nabla \omega , \nabla \omega _{-} \right) = - (\phi _{t}^{2}(\omega ), \omega _{-}). \end{aligned}$$
We note that by (29) the right-hand side of the above equality vanishes thus, we get \(\frac{d}{dt}\Vert \omega _{-} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le 0\) and by assumption (12)
$$\begin{aligned} \omega \ge 0 \text{ in } \overline{\Omega } \times [0,t^{*}]. \end{aligned}$$
(95)
Now, we shall prove that
$$\begin{aligned} \omega (x,t)\ge \frac{\omega _{\min }}{1 + \kappa _{2}\omega _{\min }t} \text{ for } (x,t)\in \overline{\Omega } \times [0,t^{*}]. \end{aligned}$$
(96)
We test the equation (92) by \((\omega - \omega _{\min }^{t})_{-}\) and we obtain
$$\begin{aligned}&(\partial _{t} \omega , (\omega - \omega _{\min }^{t})_{-}) - (\omega v, \nabla (\omega - \omega _{\min }^{t})_{-} ) + \left( \mu _{\Psi _{t}\Phi _{t}}\nabla \omega , \nabla \left( \omega - \omega _{\min }^{t} \right) _{-} \right) \nonumber \\&\quad = - \kappa _{2}(\phi _{t}^{2}(\omega ), (\omega - \omega _{\min }^{t})_{-} ). \end{aligned}$$
(97)
Using (13) we get
$$\begin{aligned} (\partial _{t} \omega , (\omega - \omega _{\min }^{t})_{-}) = \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert (\omega - \omega _{\min }^{t})_{-} \Vert _{2}^{2} - \kappa _{2} \left( (\omega _{\min }^{t})^{2} ,(\omega - \omega _{\min }^{t})_{-} \right) \end{aligned}$$
hence, using inequality \( 0\le \mu _{\Psi _{t}\Phi _{t}}\) and \({\text {div}}v=0\) in (97) we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert (\omega - \omega _{\min }^{t})_{-} \Vert _{2}^{2} - \kappa _{2} \left( (\omega _{\min }^{t})^{2} ,(\omega - \omega _{\min }^{t})_{-} \right) \le - \kappa _{2}(\phi _{t}^{2}(\omega ), (\omega - \omega _{\min }^{t})_{-} ) . \end{aligned}$$
We write the above inequality the form
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert (\omega - \omega _{\min }^{t})_{-} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le -\kappa _{2}(( \phi _{t}(\omega )-\omega _{\min }^{t})(\phi _{t}(\omega )+\omega _{\min }^{t}), (\omega - \omega _{\min }^{t})_{-} ). \end{aligned}$$
We note that \(-\kappa _{2}((\phi _{t}(\omega )+\omega _{\min }^{t}), (\omega - \omega _{\min }^{t})_{-} )\) is nonnegative thus, using (32) we get \(\phi _{t}(\omega )\le \omega \) we have
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert (\omega - \omega _{\min }^{t})_{-} \Vert _{2}^{2}\le & {} -\kappa _{2}(( \omega -\omega _{\min }^{t})(\phi _{t}(\omega )+\omega _{\min }^{t}), (\omega - \omega _{\min }^{t})_{-} ) \\= & {} -\kappa _{2}\big ( (\phi _{t}(\omega )+\omega _{\min }^{t}), \left| (\omega - \omega _{\min }^{t})_{-} \right| ^{2} \big )\le 0. \end{aligned}$$
Therefore, we obtain \(\frac{d}{dt}\Vert (\omega - \omega _{\min }^{t})_{-} \Vert _{2}^{2}\le 0\) and by (12) we get (96). Now, we shall prove that
$$\begin{aligned} \omega (x,t)\le \frac{\omega _{\max }}{1 + \kappa _{2}\omega _{\max }t} \text{ for } (x,t)\in \overline{\Omega } \times [0,t^{*}]. \end{aligned}$$
(98)
Indeed, firstly we note that from (13), (29) and (96) we have
$$\begin{aligned} \phi _{t}(\omega )=\omega \end{aligned}$$
(99)
hence, if we test the equation (92) by \((\omega - \omega _{\max }^{t})_{+}\) then we obtain
$$\begin{aligned}&(\partial _{t} \omega , (\omega - \omega _{\max }^{t})_{+}) - (\omega v, \nabla (\omega - \omega _{\max }^{t})_{+} ) + \left( \mu _{\Psi _{t}\Phi _{t}}\nabla \omega , \nabla \left( \omega - \omega _{\max }^{t} \right) _{+} \right) \\&\quad = - \kappa _{2}(\omega ^{2}, (\omega - \omega _{\max }^{t})_{+} ). \end{aligned}$$
Proceeding as earlier, we get
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert (\omega - \omega _{\max }^{t})_{+} \Vert _{2}^{2} -\kappa _{2} \left( (\omega _{\max }^{t})^{2} ,(\omega - \omega _{\max }^{t})_{+} \right) \le - \kappa _{2}(\omega ^{2}, (\omega - \omega _{\max }^{t})_{+} ). \end{aligned}$$
and
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert (\omega - \omega _{\max }^{t})_{+} \Vert _{2}^{2}\le & {} -\kappa _{2}(( \omega -\omega _{\max }^{t})(\omega +\omega _{\max }^{t}), (\omega - \omega _{\max }^{t})_{+} ) \\= & {} - \kappa _{2}((\omega +\omega _{\max }^{t}), |(\omega -\omega _{\max }^{t})_{+}|^{2} ) \end{aligned}$$
hence, we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2}&\frac{d}{dt}\Vert (\omega - \omega _{\max }^{t})_{+} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le 0. \end{aligned}$$
(100)
By (12) we get (98). We shall prove that
$$\begin{aligned} b(x,t) \ge b_{\min }^{t} \text{ for } (x,t)\in \overline{\Omega } \times [0,t^{*}]. \end{aligned}$$
(101)
For this purpose we test the equation (93) by \((b - b_{\min }^{t})_{-}\). Then we get
$$\begin{aligned}&(\partial _{t} b, (b - b_{\min }^{t})_{-}) - (b v, \nabla ((b - b_{\min }^{t})_{-} ) ) + \left( \mu _{\Psi _{t}\Phi _{t}}\nabla b, \nabla ((b - b_{\min }^{t})_{-}) \right) \\&\quad = - (\psi _{t}(b) \omega , (b - b_{\min }^{t})_{-}) + ( \mu _{\Psi _{t}\Phi _{t}}\left| D(v) \right| ^{2}, (b - b_{\min }^{t})_{-}). \end{aligned}$$
The first term on the left-hand side is equal to
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert (b - b_{\min }^{t})_{-} \Vert _{2}^{2} - \left( \frac{\omega _{\max }b_{\min }}{ \left( 1 + \omega _{\max }\kappa _{2}t \right) ^{\frac{1}{\kappa _{2}} + 1}}, (b - b_{\min }^{t})_{-} \right) . \end{aligned}$$
The second term of the left-hand side vanishes and the third is nonnegative. Thus, we get
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert (b - b_{\min }^{t})_{-} \Vert _{2}^{2} - \left( \frac{\omega _{\max }b_{\min }}{ \left( 1 + \omega _{\max }\kappa _{2}t \right) ^{\frac{1}{\kappa _{2}} + 1}}, (b - b_{\min }^{t})_{-} \right) \le - (\psi _{t}(b) \omega , (b - b_{\min }^{t})_{-}). \end{aligned}$$
Using (98) we get
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert (b - b_{\min }^{t})_{-} \Vert _{2}^{2} - \left( \frac{\omega _{\max }b_{\min }}{ \left( 1 + \omega _{\max }\kappa _{2}t \right) ^{\frac{1}{\kappa _{2}} + 1}}, (b - b_{\min }^{t})_{-} \right) \\&\quad \le - \frac{\omega _{\max }}{1 + \omega _{\max }\kappa _{2}t} (\psi _{t}(b) , (b - b_{\min }^{t})_{-}) \end{aligned}$$
and by definition (13) we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert (b - b_{\min }^{t})_{-} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le - \frac{\omega _{\max }}{1 + \omega _{\max }\kappa _{2}t} (\psi _{t}(b) - b_{\min }^{t}, (b - b_{\min }^{t})_{-}). \end{aligned}$$
From (94) and (31) we have \(\psi _{t}(b)\le b\) so, we obtain
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert (b - b_{\min }^{t})_{-} \Vert _{2}^{2} \le - \frac{\omega _{\max }}{1 + \omega _{\max }\kappa _{2}t} (b - b_{\min }^{t}, (b - b_{\min }^{t})_{-}) \\&\quad = - \frac{\omega _{\max }}{1 + \omega _{\max }\kappa _{2}t} \Vert (b-b_{\min }^{t})_{-} \Vert _{2}^{2} \end{aligned}$$
and then \(\frac{d}{dt}\Vert (b - b_{\min }^{t})_{-} \Vert _{2}^{2}\le 0\). Using (11) and (13) we get (101).
Note that from (28) and (101) we get
$$\begin{aligned} \psi _{t}(b)=b. \end{aligned}$$
(102)
Further, (25) and (101) give \(\Psi _{t}(b)=b\). Finally, (13), (27), (96) and (98) yield \(\Phi _{t}(\omega ) = \omega \). Thus,
$$\begin{aligned} \mu _{\Psi _{t}\Phi _{t}}= \frac{\Psi _{t}(b)}{\Phi _{t}(\omega )} = \frac{b}{\omega }. \end{aligned}$$
(103)
Applying (99), (102) and (103) we deduce that system (91)-(93) has the following form
$$\begin{aligned}&(\partial _{t} v, w) - (v\otimes v,\nabla w) + \left( \frac{b}{\omega } D(v), D(w) \right) =0 \text{ for } w\in \dot{\mathcal {V}}_{{\text {div}}}^{1}, \end{aligned}$$
(104)
$$\begin{aligned}&(\partial _{t} \omega , z) - (\omega v, \nabla z ) + \left( \frac{b}{\omega } \nabla \omega , \nabla z \right) = - \kappa _{2}(\omega ^{2}, z ) \text{ for } z\in \mathcal {V}^{1}, \end{aligned}$$
(105)
$$\begin{aligned}&(\partial _{t} b, q) - (b v, \nabla q ) + \left( \frac{b}{\omega } \nabla b, \nabla q \right) = - (b \omega , q) + \left( \frac{b}{\omega } \left| D(v) \right| ^{2}, q\right) \text{ for } q\in \mathcal {V}^{1}\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(106)
for a.a. \(t\in (0,t^{*})\).