Abstract
Background
The value of the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been evaluated in detail.
Methods
Between 2008 and 2009, 61 patients with HCC within the Milan criteria underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and hepatectomy. The tumor margin was determined preoperatively based on hepatobiliary phase images. Microscopic portal vein invasion (MPVI), intrahepatic metastasis (IM), and recurrence of HCC within 1 year after hepatectomy were evaluated in 24 patients with non-smooth margins at the periphery of the tumor and 37 patients with smooth margins.
Results
The number of patients with MPVI and IM of HCC was significantly higher among those with non-smooth margins (42 and 38%, respectively) than among those with smooth margins (3%; p = 0.0002 and 5%; p = 0.0042, respectively). A non-smooth margin was identified as a significant predictor of MPVI (odds ratio 18.814, p = 0.024) and IM (odds ratio 6.498, p = 0.036) of HCC on multivariate analysis. Furthermore, a non-smooth margin was identified as a significant predictor of recurrence within 1 year after hepatectomy (odds ratio 4.306, p = 0.04) on multivariate analysis.
Conclusions
A non-smooth tumor margin in the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI is useful to predict MPVI, IM, and early recurrence of HCC after hepatectomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Microscopic vascular invasion (MVI) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); in particular, microscopic portal vein invasion (MPVI), is known to be a prognostic factor after hepatectomy or liver transplantation even in patients with small HCC [1–7]. Tumor size, tumor grade, and tumor markers have been reported to predict MVI of HCC [8–13]. It has recently been reported that radiological findings with recent diagnostic imaging were useful for predicting MVI of HCC [14–17]. Gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA) is a newly developed liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent with combined dynamic imaging and hepatocyte-selective properties. This contrast agent is concentrated in the liver parenchyma in the hepatobiliary phase and is reported to improve the detection of small HCCs and predict the histological differentiation of HCC [18–20]. However, the relationship between MVI of HCC and the hepatobiliary phase findings on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI has not been evaluated in detail. We therefore attempted to clarify whether there might be a difference in MVI of HCC according to the hepatobiliary phase findings on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in patients with HCC within the Milan criteria [21]. Furthermore, as there have been no previous reports on the topic, to the best of our knowledge, we attempted to clarify whether there might be a difference in surgical outcomes based on the hepatobiliary phase findings on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI.
Patients, materials, and methods
Between 2008 and 2009, 135 patients were given a diagnosis of HCC based on ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Of these, 91 patients underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI, and 61 patients were enrolled in this study because they were within the Milan criteria on the imaging findings. There were 49 men (80%) and 12 women (20%), and the mean age was 67 years (range 51–83 years). The Child-Pugh class, indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICGR15), serum level of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and serum level of protein induced by vitamin K absence and antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) were examined preoperatively. The median and mean AFP values were 14 and 265 ng/ml, respectively, and the median and mean PIVKA-II values were 35 and 559 mAU/ml, respectively. Of the 61 patients, 53 were given diagnoses of single HCC, 5 cm or less in diameter; 4 were given diagnoses of two nodular HCCs, 3 cm or less in diameter; and 4 were given diagnoses of three nodular HCCs, 3 cm or less in diameter. In patients with multiple HCCs, only the largest lesion was analyzed. Of the 61 patients, 7 patients had a history of hepatectomy for HCC. Five of these 7 patients were given diagnoses of second primary HCC, since recurrent HCC would have been detected within 5 years after the initial hepatectomy. Two of these 7 patients were suspected to have intrahepatic recurrence of HCC, since recurrence was detected within 1 year after initial hepatectomy. However, these 2 patients were included in this study since they met the Milan criteria for MRI findings. The clinical characteristics and MRI findings of the patients are shown in Table 1. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before hepatectomy.
All patients underwent MDCT (X vigor; Toshiba Medical System, Nasu, Japan) and Gd-EOB-DTPA -enhanced MRI at our institute. MRI was performed with a 1.5-T MRI system (INTERA ACHIEVA 1.5T; Philips Medical Systems, Best, Netherlands). Routine in-phase and opposed phase T1-weighted images (TR, 146 ms; TE, 2.3 ms and 4.6 ms, respectively; flip angle 80°, matrix, 512 × 512; field of view, 375 × 375 mm; section thickness, 7 mm; intersection gap, 1 mm) were obtained. Precontrast images were obtained in a transverse plane with a fat-suppressed two-dimensional (2D) T1-weighted gradient echo (GRE) sequence (TR, 191 ms; TE, 4.5 ms; flip angle 75°; matrix, 512 × 512; field of view, 375 × 375 mm; section thickness, 7 mm; intersection gap, 1 mm). All patients received a dose of 0.1 ml/kg Gd-EOB-DTPA (Primovist; Bayer Schering Pharma, Berlin, Germany) intravenously at a speed of 2 ml/s. The line was flushed with 20 ml of saline. Immediately after the start of the Gd-EOB-DTPA injection, dynamic studies with a fat-suppressed 2D T1-weighted GRE sequence were performed during the arterial dominant phase (20 s), portal phase (60 s), venous phase (120 s), and equilibrium phase (180 s). T2-weighted fast spin echo (T2W) sequences (TR, 2500; TE, 90; flip angle 90°; matrix, 512 × 512; field of view, 375 × 375 mm; section thickness, 7 mm; intersection gap, 1 mm) were taken after the dynamic images. Hepatobiliary phase images were taken at 10–15 min after the end of injection with T1W images with fat suppression. This protocol was determined and all patients were given a diagnosis of HCC by a radiologist (R.K.) and hepatic surgeons who had expertise in liver MR imaging.
The tumor capsules in the axial dynamic MRI (venous and/or equilibrium phase) and CT scans were classified as complete radiological capsules, which completely surrounded the entire circumference of the tumor; incomplete radiological capsules; which partially surrounded the tumor circumference; and absence of radiological capsules.
Tumor margins in the axial and coronal hepatobiliary phase were classified as those with a smooth margin at the periphery of the tumor and those with a non-smooth margin. If a tumor had a minute budding portion at its periphery protruding into the liver parenchyma, the tumor margin was considered to be non-smooth (Figs. 1, 2, 3). However, if a tumor had no budding portion at the periphery, the tumor margin was considered to be smooth (Fig. 4). These radiological findings were determined in each patient preoperatively by the authors, who have had over 10 years of experience in liver surgery.
Recurrence within 1 year of HCC (early recurrence) after hepatectomy was evaluated according to the tumor margin in the hepatobiliary phase.
All patients underwent hepatectomy within 2 weeks after the Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Thirty of the 61 patients underwent anatomical sectionectomy or larger resection by the Glissonean pedicle transection method [22, 23], 18 patients underwent anatomical segmentectomy, and 13 patients underwent non-anatomical partial resection. The choice of resection was made on the basis of the CT findings, Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR images, and liver function (ICGR15). In patients with an incomplete radiological capsule and/or a non-smooth margin in the hepatobiliary phase, sectionectomy or larger resection was performed considering functional liver reserve. Therefore, in patients with an incomplete radiological capsule and/or a non-smooth margin in the hepatobiliary phase and poor functional liver reserve, segmentectomy or non-anatomical partial resection was performed. However, in patients with a complete radiological capsule and a smooth margin, segmentectomy or non-anatomical partial resection was performed. Macroscopic tumor type, MPVI, and intrahepatic metastasis (IM) were examined according to the General rules for the clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer of the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan [24]. The terminology of liver resection was determined based on the Terminology Committee of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association in 2000 [25].
Statistical analysis
Categorical variables were assessed using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test, and continuous variables were assessed using the unpaired t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test. A logistic stepwise regression model was used to identify predictive factors for MPVI, IM, and early recurrence of HCC. p values less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) were taken to indicate statistical significance. We used Stat View (version 4.5; Hulinks, Tokyo, Japan) and SPSS (version 11.0J; SPSS, Tokyo, Japan) for statistical analysis.
Results
Pathological findings in relation to MRI and CT are shown in Tables 2 and 3. The number of patients with MPVI of HCC was significantly higher among those with incomplete radiological capsules in the dynamic studies (42%) than among those with complete radiological capsules (6%) and those with absence of radiological capsules (8%). The number of patients with MPVI of HCC was significantly higher in patients with a non-smooth margin in the axial hepatobiliary phase (42%) than in those with a smooth margin (3%, p = 0.0002). The number of patients with IM did not differ significantly in relation to the radiological capsules, whereas the number of patients with IM was significantly higher among patients with a non-smooth margin in the axial hepatobiliary phase (38%) than among patients with a smooth margin (5%, p = 0.0043).
The clinical and MRI findings submitted to univariate analysis to predict MPVI and IM of HCC are shown in Tables 4 and 5. There were no clinical or MRI findings that predicted MPVI, except for the radiological capsule in the dynamic studies and tumor margin in the axial hepatobiliary phase. However, the number of patients with IM of HCC was significantly higher among patients with multiple HCCs on MRI (45%) than among those with a single HCC on MRI (3%).
A logistic stepwise regression model with significant variables determined by the univariate analysis was used to identify predictive factors for MPVI and IM of HCC (Table 6). A non-smooth margin was identified as a significant predictor of both MPVI (odds ratio 18.814, p = 0.024) and IM (odds ratio 6.498, p = 0.036) of HCC on multivariate analysis.
One patient underwent non-curative hepatectomy because multiple small intrahepatic metastases were seen during surgery. One patient died within 30 days after hepatectomy. Of the remaining 59 patients, 14 had intrahepatic recurrence of HCC within 1 year after hepatectomy (early recurrence). The clinical and MRI findings submitted to univariate analysis to predict early recurrence are shown in Table 7. The number of patients with early recurrence was significantly higher in the patients with a non-smooth margin in the axial hepatobiliary phase (41%) than in the patients with a smooth margin (14%, p = 0.0168). A non-smooth margin in the axial hepatobiliary phase was identified as a significant predictor of early recurrence of HCC (odds ratio 4.306, p = 0.04) on multivariate analysis (Table 8). The relationships between the tumor margin in the axial hepatobiliary phase, the surgical procedure, and early recurrence of HCC are shown in Table 9. In patients with a non-smooth margin in the axial hepatobiliary phase, 2 of 3 patients who underwent non-anatomical resection had early recurrence of HCC, whereas 7 of 19 patients who underwent anatomical resection had early recurrence of HCC.
Discussion
It has recently been reported that radiological findings with recent diagnostic imaging were useful for predicting MVI of HCC [14–17]. However, the relationship between MVI of HCC and the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI has not been evaluated in detail. In our present study, the number of patients with MPVI was significantly higher among the patients with an incomplete radiological capsule in the dynamic studies than among those without this finding. Furthermore, the number of patients with MPVI was significantly higher among those with a non-smooth margin in the hepatobiliary phase than among those without this finding. A non-smooth margin in the hepatobiliary phase was identified as a significant predictor of MPVI on multivariate analysis. Therefore, a non-smooth margin in the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI is useful to predict MPVI of HCC in patients with HCC within the Milan criteria.
MPVI of HCC is thought to be difficult to detect before the treatment of HCC, since MPVI of HCC is diagnosed on the basis of histological findings. However, Miyata et al. [14] reported that distortion of coronal enhancement at the tumor periphery on CT hepatic angiography (CTHA) was the most significant variable for the risk of microscopic invasion of the portal vein. Shirabe et al. [16] reported that the portal perfusion defect area ratio on CT arterio-portography (CTAP) was a significant independent predictor of MPVI of HCC. Nishie et al. [15] reported that the area, but not the shape of the peritumoral enhancement on CTHA and CTAP was significantly larger in HCC patients with minute portal invasion than in those without minute portal invasion. Thus, useful radiological findings on CTHA and CTAP for predicting MVI of HCC have recently been reported. However, CTHA and CTAP cannot be routinely applied worldwide, and they are more invasive than other examinations because angiography is required.
Kim et al. [17] recently reported that irregular circumferential peritumoral enhancement on contrast-enhanced multi-arterial phase dynamic MRI showed a high probability of microvessel invasion of HCC. Their protocol is thought to be quite complicated because 4 arterial phases have to be taken within 30 s. However, Kim et al. [17] also reported that a non-smooth tumor margin in the hepatobiliary images was a significant risk factor for microvessel invasion on univariate analysis, but not on multivariate analysis. Their radiological findings in the hepatobiliary phase images and our findings in the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI are thought to be similar. Therefore, a non-smooth margin at the periphery of the tumor in the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI is useful to predict MPVI of HCC in patients with HCC within the Milan criteria.
Previously, high serum levels of AFP or PIVKA-II were reported to predict MVI of small HCC [11–13]. Tumor size and tumor grade have also been reported to predict MVI of small HCC [8–10]. Furthermore, Poon et al. [26] reported that high serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were shown to predict not only MVI but also IM of HCC. In our present study, the number of patients with IM was significantly higher among those with non-smooth margins in the hepatobiliary phase (38%) than among those with smooth margins (5%, p = 0.0043). A non-smooth margin in the hepatobiliary phase was identified as a significant predictor of IM of HCC on our multivariate analysis. Therefore, a non-smooth margin in the hepatobiliary phase image on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI is useful to predict not only MPVI of HCC but also IM of HCC in patients with HCC.
The simple nodular with extranodular growth (SNEG) type and confluent multinodular (CM) type of HCC in resected specimens have been reported to pose a greater risk of MPVI or IM of HCC than the SN type of HCC [27–32]. We therefore attempted to evaluate the macroscopic tumor type in the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. In our present study, the numbers of patients with SNEG type and CM type in resected specimens were higher among those with non-smooth margins in the hepatobiliary phase than among those without this finding. However, the accuracy of determination of each macroscopic tumor type was not adequate, probably due to the small sample size. Therefore, further studies of larger numbers are required to accurately evaluate the macroscopic tumor type.
MPVI of HCC has been reported to be one of the important prognostic factors not only for survival but also for early recurrence after hepatectomy in patients with HCC [33–35]. There have been no previous reports of the relation between surgical outcome and the hepatobiliary phase of new Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. In our present study, a non-smooth margin in the hepatobiliary phase was a significant predictor not only for MPVI of HCC but also for early recurrence of HCC. In conclusion, a non-smooth margin in the hepatobiliary phase of new Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI could be a useful preoperative predictive marker for MPVI and IM of HCC and early recurrence after hepatectomy in patients with HCC within the Milan criteria.
References
Izumi R, Shimizu K, Ii T, Yagi M, Matsui O, Nonomura A, et al. Prognostic factors of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients undergoing hepatic resection. Gastroenterology. 1994;106:720–7.
Tsai TJ, Chau GY, Lui WY, Tsay SH, King KL, Loong CC, et al. Clinical significance of microscopic tumor venous invasion in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery. 2000;127:603–8.
Vauthey JN, Lauwers GY, Esnaola NF, Do KA, Belghiti J, Mirza N, et al. Simplified staging for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1527–36.
Marsh JW, Dvorchik I, Bonham CA, Iwatsuki S. Is the pathologic TNM staging system for patients with hepatoma predictive of outcome? Cancer. 2000;88:538–43.
Hemming AW, Cattral MS, Reed AI, Van Der Werf WJ, Greig PD, Howard RJ. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2001;233:652–9.
Shah SA, Tan JC, McGilvray ID, Cattral MS, Cleary SP, Levy GA, et al. Accuracy of staging as a predictor for recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Transplantation. 2006;81:1633–9.
Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL, Wong J. Difference in tumor invasiveness in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma fulfilling the Milan criteria treated by resection and transplantation. Impact on long-term survival. Ann Surg. 2007;245:51–8.
Adachi E, Maeda T, Kajiyama K, Kinukawa N, Matsumata T, Sugimachi K, et al. Factors correlated with portal venous invasion by hepatocellular carcinoma: univariate and multivariate analyses of 232 resected cases without preoperative treatments. Cancer. 1996;77:2022–31.
Esnaola NF, Lauwers GY, Mirza NQ, Nagorney DM, Doherty D, Ikai I, et al. Predictors of microvascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who are candidates for orthotopic liver transplantation. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6:224–32.
Pawlik TM, Delman KA, Vauthey JN, Nagorney DM, Ng IO, Ikai I, et al. Tumor size predicts vascular invasion and histologic grade: implications for selection of surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:1086–92.
Shirabe K, Itoh S, Yoshizumi T, Soejima Y, Taketomi A, Aishima S, et al. The predictors of microvascular invasion in candidates for liver transplantation with hepatocellular carcinoma: with special reference to the serum levels of des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin. J Surg Oncol. 2007;95:235–40.
Hasegawa K, Imamura H, Ijichi M, Matsuyama Y, Sano K, Sugawara Y, et al. Inclusion of tumor markers improves the correlation of the Milan criteria with vascular invasion and tumor cell differentiation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:858–66.
Sakata J, Shirai Y, Wakai T, Kaneko K, Nagahashi M, Hatakeyama K. Preoperative predictors of vascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:900–5.
Miyata R, Tanimoto A, Wakabayashi G, Shimazu M, Nakatsuka S, Mukai M, et al. Accuracy of preoperative prediction of microinvasion of portal vein in hepatocellular carcinoma using superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography during hepatic angiography. J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:987–95.
Nishie A, Yoshimitsu K, Asayama Y, Irie H, Tajima T, Hirakawa M, et al. Radiologic detectability of minute portal venous invasion in hepatocellular carinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:81–7.
Shirabe K, Kajiyama K, Abe T, Sakamoto S, Fukuya T, Akazawa K, et al. Predictors of microscopic portal vein invasion by hepatocellular carcinoma: measurement of portal perfusion defect area ratio. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:1431–6.
Kim H, Park MS, Choi JY, Park YN, Kim MJ, Choi JS, et al. Can microvessel invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma be predicted by pre-operative MRI? Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1744–51.
Ichikawa T, Saito K, Yoshioka N, Tanimoto A, Gokan T, Takehara Y, et al. Detection and characterization of focal liver lesions. A Japanese phase III, multicenter comparison between Gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced computed tomography predominantly in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic liver disease. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:133–41.
Saito K, Kotake F, Ito N, Ozuki T, Mikami R, Abe K, et al. Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma: quantitative evaluation of tumor enhancement in hepatobiliary phase. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2005;4:1–9.
Kogita S, Imai Y, Okada M, Kim T, Takamura M, Fukuda K, et al. Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance images of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histological grading and portal blood flow. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(10):2405–13.
Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, Andreola S, Pulvirenti A, Bozzetti F, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:693–700.
Takasaki K, Kobayashi S, Tanaka S, Saito A, Yamamoto M, Hanyu F. Highly anatomically systematized hepatic resection with Glissonean sheath cord transection at the hepatic hilus. Int Surg. 1990;75:73–7.
Takasaki K. Glissonean pedicle transection method for hepatic resection: a new concept of liver segmentation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1998;5:286–91.
Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. The general rules for the clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer. 2nd English ed. Tokyo, Japan: Kanehara & Co., Ltd.; 2003.
Terminology committee of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association. IHPBA Brisbane 2000 Terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB. 2000;2:333–9.
Poon RT, Ng IO, Lau C, Zhu LX, Yu WC, Lo CM, et al. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor predicts venous invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study. Ann Surg. 2001;233:227–35.
Kanai T, Hirohashi S, Upton MP, Noguchi M, Kishi K, Makuuchi M, et al. Pathology of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a proposal for a new gross classification. Cancer. 1987;60:810–9.
Hui AM, Takayama T, Sano K, Kubota K, Akahane M, Ohtomo K, et al. Predictive value of gross classification of hepatocellular carcinoma on recurrence and survival after hepatectomy. J Hepatology. 2000;33:975–9.
Shimada M, Rikimaru T, Hamatsu T, Yamashita Y, Terashi T, Taguchi K, et al. The role of macroscopic classification in nodular-type hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2001;182:177–82.
Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Otsubo T, Katsuragawa H, Fukuda C, Katagiri S. Effectiveness of systematized hepatectomy with Glisson’s pedicle transection at hepatic hilus for small nodular hepatocellular carcinoma: retrospective analysis. Surgery. 2001;130:443–8.
Okusaka T, Okuda S, Ueno H, Ikeda M, Shimada K, Yamamoto J, et al. Satellite lesions in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma with reference to clinicopathologic features. Cancer. 2002;95:1931–7.
Sumie S, Kuromatsu R, Okuda K, Ando E, Takata A, Fukushima N, et al. Microvascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and its predictable clinicopathological factors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1375–82.
Poon RT, Fan ST, Ng IO, Lo CM, Liu CL, Wong J. Different risk factors and prognosis for early and late intrahepatic recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;89:500–7.
Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Tanaka E, Ohkubo T, Hasegawa K, Miyagawa S, et al. Risk factors contributing to early and late phase intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. J Hepatol. 2003;38:200–7.
Shah SA, Greig PD, Gallinger S, Cattral MS, Dixon E, Kim RD, et al. Factors associated with early recurrence after resection for hepatocellular carcinoma and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:275–83.
Acknowledgments
The authors are indebted to Associate Professor Raoul Breugelmans of the Department of International Medical Communications of Tokyo Medical University for his review of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Ariizumi, Si., Kitagawa, K., Kotera, Y. et al. A non-smooth tumor margin in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging predicts microscopic portal vein invasion, intrahepatic metastasis, and early recurrence after hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18, 575–585 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-010-0369-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-010-0369-y