Abstract
Lake Chalco lies south of the Basin of Mexico and has been the subject of studies related to Late Quaternary climate variability. In 2016, the International Continental Scientific Drilling Program “MexiDrill Project” recovered a 520-m sediment record from Lake Chalco. Magnetic susceptibility measurements revealed substantial changes in sediment physical properties between 343 and 285 m depth, suggesting changes in composition associated with fluctuations in the depositional environment. We targeted sediments in the 343–285 m interval for high-resolution facies analysis, to develop a model of Lake Chalco formation. We identified three facies associations, using sediment composition, texture, mineralogy and micro-morphological characteristics: (1) detrital facies, consisting of laminated silt, massive sand, stratified silty sand, clast-supported gravel and matrix-supported gravel; (2) biogenic facies, which include diatom ooze and bivalve coquina; and (3) volcaniclastic facies, represented by clast-supported pumice deposits. We propose that formation of Lake Chalco occurred in four stages, which we identified by changes in sediment characteristics. The first stage was an alluvial delta environment, in which debris and hyper-concentrated flows were the main sediment transport agents. The second was characterized by turbulent flows in a fluvial deltaic environment, which alternated with laminar flows associated with floodplains. The third stage was a time of fluvio-lacustrine transition in the basin, with formation of the previously identified Paleo-Chalco-I Lake, in response to wet conditions. During the fourth stage, a deep eutrophic lake formed (Paleo-Chalco-II), with an origin that appears to have been related to regional volcanism. Our working age-depth model indicates establishment of the lake at ca. 400 ± 46 ka. This paper presents the only available record of the transition from alluvial to lacustrine sedimentation of Lake Chalco. Our results allow us to establish (1) how the lake was formed and what the phases of its development were, (2) how a major volcanic event altered and transformed the lacustrine sedimentation, and (3) which climatic conditions dominated during the lake formation. The age for the onset of the lacustrine sedimentation in Chalco is for the first time constrained to around 400 ka. This enables to expand our knowledge of the climate for a time for which there is no information from terrestrial records of tropical North America.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Lake Chalco (Central Mexico) occupies the south-eastern part of the Basin of Mexico, where Mexico City is located (Fig. 1). Previous drilling recovered the upper 122 m of the sequence, whose analyses yielded stratigraphic, paleoclimatic and paleolimnological data that provided insights into the history of Lake Chalco over the past 140 ka (Lozano-Garcia et al. 1993, 2015; Caballero and Ortega 1998; Ortega-Guerrero and Newton 1998; Torres-Rodríguez et al. 2015; Ortega-Guerrero et al. 2017, 2020; Avendaño-Villeda et al. 2018; Martínez-Abarca et al. 2019; Caballero et al. 2019). It was not until recently, however, that deep cores (520 m) were drilled in this basin (Lozano-García et al. 2017), enabling investigation into the origin of the lake.
It is widely accepted that the Basin of Mexico was an exorheic fluvial system that drained southward and whose closure occurred as a consequence of the accumulation of volcanic deposits in the south during the Pleistocene (Mooser 1963). Subsequent studies reported closure of the basin between 1300 and 600 ka (Martin del Pozzo 1982; Macias et al. 2012; Arce et al. 2013), determined from the age of the volcanic deposits that outcrop in the Basin today. Nevertheless, because of the inaccessibility of the oldest sediments, which are covered by younger geologic deposits, it had not been possible to explore what geological processes led to basin closure or when they occurred.
In 2016, the ICDP-supported (International Continental Scientific Drilling Program) MexiDrill Project retrieved four cores from Lake Chalco, recovering a composite sequence that extended to a maximum depth of 520 m (Lozano-Garcia et al. 2017; Brown et al. 2019). The initial stratigraphic description of the MexiDrill Chalco composite sequence revealed that the upper 300 m are composed of fine-grained lacustrine sediments, and the lower section is comprised of > 200 m of alluvial and fluvial deposits, as well as lavas (Brown et al. 2019; Romero-Vera 2019).
We utilized facies analysis of the deposits between 343 and 285 m depth in Lake Chalco, which record the transition from a fluvial-alluvial phase to a lacustrine phase, to infer the environmental conditions under which the lake formed and to characterize the processes that led to its development. Analysis of the formative stages of Lake Chalco is relevant to our understanding of the geologic evolution of Central Mexico and contributes information about broader questions related to lake formation in volcanically and tectonically active regions.
Study area
The Basin of Mexico, located in the east-central part of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (TMVB) (19°15′N, 98°58′W), is an endorheic depression with a lacustrine plain at 2240 m above sea level (m asl). Lake Chalco is the southeastern-most water body of an ancient vast lacustrine system that developed in the Basin of Mexico during pre-Hispanic times. This lake system has recently undergone massive transformations and has a long history of human occupation (Niederberger 1987; Sanders et al. 1979). Today, Lake Chalco is reduced into a shallow, subsaline marsh (zmax < 3 m), with an area of ~ 5.5 km2, and is located next to Mexico City, a megalopolis with > 25 million inhabitants (INEGI 2010). The current water body is the depocenter of the sub-basin of Chalco, which is morphologically delimited by the following volcanic ranges: (1) the Sierra de Las Cruces to the west, (2) Sierra de Santa Catarina to the north, (3) the Sierra Nevada to the east, and (4) the Sierra Chichinautzin Volcanic Field to the south (Fig. 1). Other volcanic structures with ages around 1300 ka are found north of the Sierra de Santa Catarina and Jaimes-Viera et al. (2018) called them “Peñon Monogenetic Volcanic Complex (PMVG)”.
The Sierra de Las Cruces is composed of lava flows, pyroclastic and lahar deposits that are aligned NW–SE (Mora-Álvarez et al. 1991). The bulk of its volcanic activity occurred during the late Miocene (Mooser et al. 1974; Osete et al. 2000). The Sierra Nevada is composed of a chain of stratovolcanoes that include: (a) Tlaloc-Telapon (1.8 Ma); (b) Iztaccihuatl volcanic complex (0.9–0.08 Ma); and (c) Popocatepetl, whose current cone was formed 0.23 Ma ago (Nixon 1989; Macias et al. 2012; Siebe et al. 2017). At least 220 monogenetic volcanoes constitute the Sierra Chichinautzin Volcanic Field. It includes scoria cones (e.g., Xitle), shield volcanoes (e.g., Teuhtli) and lava domes (e.g. Mesa la Gloria) (Bloomfield 1975; Martin del Pozzo 1982; Marquez et al. 1999). Jaimes-Viera et al. (2018) suggested that volcanic activity in Sierra Chichinautzin occurred between ca. 1300 ka and 7 ka ago.
Methods
Drilling, initial core description and preliminary stratigraphy
The MEXI-CHA16 cores (holes 1A, 1B and 1C) were drilled near the modern lake depocenter, in the sub-basin of Chalco (19° 15′ 26″ N, 98° 58′ 32″ W) (Fig. 1c). The drilling effort yielded sediment from the surface down to 520 m depth. Drilling was carried out using a Longyear LF90 rig with standard HQ3 wireline diamond coring tools, and sediment cores were retrieved in polycarbonate liners that were 1.5-m long and 6.1 cm in diameter (Brown et al. 2019). After completion of the field program, the sections were sent to the LacCore Facility at the University of Minnesota for core measurement, scanning and description. Cores were then split lengthwise, cleaned and high-resolution color scans were acquired from each section using a DMT CoreScan digital linescan camera. Magnetic susceptibility was measured systematically at 1-cm intervals using a Bartington MS2E sensor. Stratigraphic correlation among sequences 1A, 1B and 1C was carried out by Valero-Garces et al. (In press), who used magnetic susceptibility and facies identification to develop a composite sequence that minimized the effects of gaps and artifacts from the drilling process.
Preliminary visual characterization of the MEXI-CHA16-1C core sections (color, texture, structure, thickness, sorting and boundary type) was done using high-resolution images, viewed with the free distribution software CoreWall (http://www.corewall.org/). Sediments analyzed for this study were between 343 and 285 m deep in the composite sequence.
Sediment description
Thirty-nine smear slides of samples from the MEXI-CHA16-1C core, prepared from sandy to clayey materials that represent the observed major shifts in sediment texture and composition, provided a basis for initial major component descriptions (Schnurrenberger et al. 2003). Additionally, 21 samples of undisturbed, fine-grain (clay to sand) sediment were prepared for thin sections in blocks of 4 × 5 cm. Thin-section samples were collected in aluminum trays, freeze-dried, embedded with epoxy resin and polished to 30-µm thickness in preparation for microscopic analyses. The first analysis was a petrographic micro-morphological description that included general mineralogy, geometry, and microstructures, as well as documenting the presence of diatoms, charcoal and other biogenic material. The second analysis consisted of counting exclusively quartz (Q) and feldspar/plagioclase (F). Prior to counting, the thin sections were stained with potassium rhodizonate and barium chloride. Mineral phase percentages were estimated by counting 200 points, following the method of Gazzi-Dickinson (Ingersoll et al. 1984). The ratio Q/(Q + F) was estimated to infer the precipitation regime under which sediment could have been deposited (Picurd 1971; Weltje 1994). According to this method, sediments having a higher Q/(Q + F) ratio are indicative of wet conditions due to the loss of feldspar and plagioclase during chemical weathering (Van der Kamp 2010).
Texture analysis was carried out based on two different methods. The first one was only used for determining the grain-size distribution of coarse sand and gravel deposits, following the Rosiwal’s intercepts methodology (Rosiwal 1898). This method consists on measuring clasts length intersected by parallel lines regularly spaced at 3 cm, perpendicular to core length, on scanner images where 30 clasts (minimum) were considered without repeating the same clast thrice (Sarocchi et al. 2005). Measurements were carried out with free distribution software ImageJ (Rasband 2018). The second method, applied on clay, silt and medium/fine sand, was performed on 39 samples using a Beckman Coulter Multi-Wavelength Particle Size Analyzer. Particle sizes obtained from both methods were converted to phi units, and later, sorting was inferred by estimating standard deviation (SD) based on the grain size distribution using software R version 3.5.0 (R Core Team 2018). Well-sorted material has SD values > 0.7, whereas poorly sorted material has SD values < 0.7.
Semi-quantitative diatom analysis was carried using the smear slide samples of fine-grained (sandy to clayey) deposits. We counted diatoms in two or three parallel transects on the smear slides. Diatoms were identified to genus level and at least 300 valves were counted to obtain statistically significant results (Smol and Stoermer 2010). Additionally, 21 stratigraphic samples were processed for pollen counting to estimate the relative percentages of the most common pollen taxa, following the Batten (1999) methodology.
Total nitrogen (TN), total carbon (TC) and total organic carbon (TOC) were determined on 17 samples with a Thermo Fisher Scientific NC-Soils Analyzer FLASH 2000 Series Elemental Analyzer. Total inorganic carbon (TIC) was estimated as TC-TOC. δ13C and δ15N were measured in organic matter with a DELTA PLUS Finnigan MAT Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer at the Universidade A Coruña Laboratory (Spain). Identification of aquatic/terrestrial organic matter sources was done using TN, TC, TOC and δ13C data, following the scheme proposed by Meyers and Teranes (2001).
Age model
A preliminary Bayesian age-depth model was constructed using R studio and the Bacon package (Blaauw and Christen 2011). The model took 168 sections with 3.74 × 107 iterations. Depth data used for the model are referred to as “corrected composite depth (mcc),” which considers sand and volcaniclastics to be instantaneously deposited materials. The time scale for the lacustrine sequence was developed using five 14C ages from the upper 36 m of sediment, collected during earlier drilling at Chalco (core CHA08; 0.5 km southwest of the MexiDrill site in the sub-basin of Chalco) (Herrera-Hernandez 2011; Ortega-Guerrero et al. 2017) (Table 1). The 14C ages were calibrated using the IntCal13 calibration curve (Reimer et al. 2013). For sediments below 36 m depth, a 234U/230Th date was obtained on zircons extracted from a tephra layer in a core collected previously at Chalco (core CHA08, 0.5 km southwest of the MexiDrill site) (Ortega-Guerrero et al. 2017). Additionally, we employed an age of 130 ka at 106 m depth defined by Avendaño-Villeda et al. (2018), who identified the transition between Marine Isotopic Stages 6 and 5 based on diatoms analyses in Chalco, and assigned the age of this transition according to the Lisiecki and Raymo (2005) chronology. Finally, an age of 280 ± 40 ka was determined for lacustrine carbonates at 192 m (166.73 mcc), using 234U/230Th. The latter is a tentative age that will likely be modified in future studies. It was estimated from four different sediment aliquots; one returned a date of 231 ± 11 ka, and another returned a date of 332 ± 14 ka (2-sigma uncertainties). Two other aliquots returned infinite ages. We used the mean of the two finite age results to provide a rough age estimate.
Results
In this section, we present facies descriptions, using the results of textural, mineralogical, compositional and stable isotope analyses from the targeted depth interval (343–285 m).
Facies description
Eight facies were defined in the sequence (Fig. 2). Using the main components, facies were grouped into three categories: (1) detrital, which includes (a) laminated silt (LS), (b) massive sand (MS), (c) stratified silty sand (STS), (d) clast-supported gravel (CSG), and (e) matrix-supported gravel (MSG) facies; (2) biogenic, composed of (a) diatom ooze (DO) and (b) bivalve coquina (CO) facies; (3) volcaniclastic, which includes clast-supported pumice (CSP) facies (Table 2).
-
(1)
Detrital facies
The detrital facies are composed of silt, sand and gravel deposits (Fig. 3). Minor components in detrital facies include biogenic remnants such as diatoms, organic material, and charcoal. Although detrital sediment is distributed along the sequence, coarser material (gravel) is more abundant toward the base of the stratigraphic column (> 315 m). Mineralogically, sand deposits are dominated by plagioclase, feldspar, pyroxene, olivine and volcanic glass. On the other hand, gravel deposits are composed of andesite and basalt fragments. Magnetic susceptibility displays a wide range of values, with the gravel deposits showing higher values (400–1500 10–5 SI) than silt deposits (150–250 10–5 SI). Massive sand deposits have the lowest values of total nitrogen and total organic carbon (TOC: 0.1–0.4%; TN: 0.01–0.03%), whereas laminated silt and stratified silty sand have higher values (TOC: 0.09–1.59%; TN: 0.01–0.09%). In addition, the massive sand sections have low values of Q/(Q + F) ratio (< 0.4).
-
(2)
Biogenic facies
These facies are composed mainly of diatoms, pollen, charcoal, organic material, ostracods, gastropods and vascular plant remnants. They are present between 315 and 285 m depth; with the highest abundance from 306 to 286 m depth. Magnetic susceptibility in these deposits is between 250 and 150 10–5 SI, the lowest in the core record. Total nitrogen varies between 0.08 and 0.52%, while total organic carbon varies between 0.61 and 5.92%, the highest values in the core record. There are two kinds of biogenic deposits: diatom ooze and bivalve coquina.
The diatom ooze is composed of 90% diatom valves and 10% feldspar-rich silt, and other components such as pollen, phytoliths, and vascular plant remains. Diatoms were divided into two associations (Fig. 4f). Association A is composed of Staurosira, Rhopalodia, Cocconeis, and Navicula, which correspond to shallow-water conditions. In contrast, association B is formed by Stephanodiscus cf. minutulus (Kütz) Cleve & Möller, and Stephanodiscus niagarae-Ehrenberg, as well as Aulacoseira sp., which are planktonic forms that are common in eutrophic and relatively deeper-water lakes (Edlund and Kingston 2004; Bennion and Simpson 2011; Gabito et al. 2013). The diatom deposits are characterized by high values of the Q/(Q + F) ratio (> 0.4). Most of the diatom deposits are intercalated with detrital facies, particularly between 306 and 294 m depth.
The bivalve coquina is composed of bivalve, ostracod and gastropod remnants (Fig. 4g). It is present at 293 m depth as a unique deposit of 1.2 m thickness. Its palynomorph content is composed mainly of the microalga Pediastrum, and pollen of Pinus, Picea, Alnus, Ambrosia and Quercus.
-
(3)
Volcaniclastic facies
Volcaniclastic facies includes four tephra deposits between 294 and 286 m depth (Fig. 5). These are well sorted, with sub-angular pumices. Based on their color and mineralogy (plagioclase, muscovite and quartz), these are from silica-rich eruptions. Magnetic susceptibility has intermediate values, between 250 and 570 10–5 SI. The clast-supported pumice deposits are named here to represent their stratigraphic depth: (a) Tephra CHA16-288, (b) Tephra CHA16-289a, (c) Tephra CHA16-289b and (d) Tephra CHA16-294.
Tephra CHA16-288 is located at 288.1 m depth has a thickness of 13 cm. This deposit shows inverted gradation, from ash to lapilli, and has an inferior planar contact. Tephra CHA16-289a is located at 289.6 m depth and is 24 cm thick. It is a lapilli deposit with apparent lamination and an inferior planar contact. Tephra CHA16-289b is located at 289.9 m depth and is 45 cm thick. It is a massive lapilli deposit with an inferior planar contact. Tephra CHA16-294, located at 294 m depth, is 85 cm thick, and the largest volcanic deposit in the sequence (Fig. 5H.4). This deposit is divided in two units. The first, at the bottom, is composed of massive lapilli with an inferior planar contact, whereas the second unit overlies the first one and is a massive ash deposit with an inferior sharp contact.
Age model
The Bayesian age-depth model suggests that the upper 343 m of the MexiDrill Chalco sequence spans the last 408 ± 47 ka (Fig. 6). Eighty-nine percent of the ages obtained in the age-depth model are within the 95% confidence range (uncertainties < 44 ka). The model provides a preliminary estimate for the age of the deepest lacustrine deposits in the Mexi-Drill core. As discussed below, deposits associated with the establishment of a permanent lake are at 293.1 m depth (236 mcc), and have a model age of 400 ± 46 ka. The age-depth model indicates that the section analyzed in this work (343–285 m; 240–229 mcc) spans ~ 21 ka of the depositional evolution before and during the formation of Lake Chalco.
Discussion
Formative history of Lake Chalco
We divided the stratigraphic column from Lake Chalco into four phases using the stratigraphy, magnetic susceptibility data, and the Q/(Q + F) ratio. These stages are, from deepest to shallowest: (a) alluvial, (b) fluvial, (c) transitional fluvial-lacustrine, and (d) lacustrine (Fig. 2). In this section, we describe the characteristics of each stage and its associated environmental processes.
Alluvial stage
Deposits associated with this phase are located between 343 and 330 m depth. They are characterized for the most part by MSG facies. The main features of this stage are the absence of organic material and high magnetic susceptibility values (Table 2). Angularity in clasts could indicate active collision between clasts during the sediment transport. Particle size is > 2 cm, indicating high-energy transport.
There are two types of features in the MSG facies. The first is dominated by massive, poorly sorted and ungraded gravel, suggesting the presence of debris flows. They are gravity-driven flows of highly concentrated mixtures of sediment and water (> 80 wt% [percentage of total dry mass]), whose deposition occurs abruptly (Sohn et al. 1999). The second feature consists of moderately sorted, usually graded gravel, with gradual coarsening upward contacts at the bottom, and stratified sand at the top. These characteristics suggest the presence of hyper-concentrated flows (Cao and Qian 1990; Cronin et al. 1999). These are gravity-driven flows, but unlike debris flows, they have a suspended sand sediment content between 20 and 60 wt% (Beverage and Culbertson 1964) and their deposition can generate graded deposits (Pierson 2005). Presence of both hyper-concentrated and debris flow deposits leads us to propose that this section corresponds to an alluvial environment (Lowe 1982; Smith 1986).
According to our preliminary chronology, sediments in this stage may have been deposited around 408 ± 46 ka. Additionally, presence of rock fragments rich in plagioclase, orthopyroxene, clinopyroxene and amphibole in both types of deposits suggests that the material came from ranges in the basin with basalt-andesite composition, such as the Chichinautzin, Santa Catarina, Las Cruces and Nevada ranges (Fig. 3e).
Effusive volcanic activity younger than 250 ka has been recorded in the Chichinautzin and Santa Catarina Volcanic Fields (Lugo-Hubp et al. 1994; Marquez et al. 1999; Arce et al. 2015; Ortiz-Enriquez 2017; Jaimes-Viera et al. 2018), which make them unlikely sources of the MGS deposits of the alluvial stage. Volcanic activity around the basin, which is older than 400 ka and could have been the source of the MGS deposits, occurred in the Sierra de Las Cruces (Osete et al. 2000; Aguirre-Diaz et al. 2006; Arce et al. 2008), Peñon Monogenetic Volcanic Group (Jaimes-Viera et al. 2018) and Sierra Nevada (Nixon 1989).
Fluvial stage
CSG, MS, and STS facies constitute the fluvial stage deposits from 330 to 306.5 m depth. The main characteristic of this core interval is the first appearance in the record of organic materials including vascular plant remains, amorphous organic matter, and charcoal layers. These sediments, however, are devoid of remains of aquatic organisms. According to our age model, sediments of this stage are likely older than 407 ± 46 ka.
Results of the Rosiwal method show that clasts in the CSG facies are > 2 mm, but < 2 cm, suggesting a high-energy transport into the water body such as a streamflow, but with lower energy than during the alluvial stage. Also, textural and compositional sediment characteristics of the CSG, such as subangular-rounded and very well-sorted clastic deposits, in the absence of lacustrine organisms, suggest reworking (Beverage and Culbertson 1964; Smith 1986). These lithological characteristics have been recognized on the ancient lake Chalco shoreline, along with sorted sand and mud associated with recent sediments from the Amecameca River (Fig. 1b) (Frederick and Cordoba 2019). Lithological heterogeneity in CSG clasts, such as pumice, basalt, and andesite fragments, suggests that the sediment came from multiple sources (Fig. 3d). A sediment source located > 30 km from the drill site could significantly rework and sort the clasts. The pumice fragments present in the CSG facies (Fig. 3D1), products of silica-rich explosive volcanism, are unlikely to have come from the Sierra Chichinautzin Volcanic Field, as their products are associated more with effusive to explosive materials of basaltic to andesitic composition (Siebe et al. 2005).
SM facies are intercalated with CSG facies and the transition between the two facies is sometimes characterized by gravel deposits, which gradually are replaced by sand. This change may be associated with low-energy periods in streamflow during which fine suspended sand was deposited in standing ponds (Lespez et al. 2011; Miall 2012). Erosive contacts in the transition from sand to gravel deposits may have been associated with an increase in the streamflow energy. SM deposits show low %N and %C org values (TOC: 0.1–0.4%; TN: 0.01–0.03%), indicating low quantities of organic material, both terrestrial and aquatic (Fig. 7c).
Grain size and mineralogical analyses on STS facies show that the sedimentation pattern consists of an alternation between light quartz-plagioclase massive coarse sand layers and dark silty-sand layers rich in charcoal and plagioclase, with parallel laminations. The light layers are characterized by poorly sorted crystals and have erosive lower contacts. These characteristics may be associated with relatively short-distance transport, which precluded sorting of the sediment, but its energy could have eroded underlying sediments (Fig. 3 C1 and C2). In contrast, dark layers are composed of plagioclase crystals with horizontal alignment, charcoal particles, and gradual lower contacts, suggesting settling in still waters of shallow (cm) ponds (Fig. 3 C3 and C4). Lespez et al. (2011) described laminated silty sand with numerous charcoal and vegetal remains on thin sections similar to STS facies from a Holocene fluvial record in West Africa. Those deposits seem to be associated with periodic occurrence of fluvial inputs (floods) to a floodplain. We suggest that STS facies are associated with channel abandonment and the development of a floodplain, where light layers may represent flooding periods. Reduction of the ratio Q/(Q + F) in dark-layer deposits suggests dry periods between 322 and 311 m depth (Van der Kamp 2010), and explains the presence of 0.5-cm charcoal layers associated with fires in the region (Fig. 3 C5). We suggest that during dark layer deposition, the floodplain level and energy declined because of dry conditions in the region.
Characteristics of the terrestrial organic matter deposited during the fluvial stage were explored using the TOC, δ13C and TOC/TN values. Data were divided into two groups, the first corresponding to samples from greater depths (> 307 m) and the second corresponding to samples from depths < 307 m (Fig. 7a). Older samples have lower δ13C ( – 33.7 to – 25.3 ‰) and TOC/TN (4.4–6.9) than younger ones (δ13C: – 23.7 to – 19.8 ‰; TOC/TN: 14.4–18.3). We would expect a post-burial diagenesis effect in the organic matter in samples under 307 m depth. Meyers et al. (1995) showed that selective degradation of terrestrial organic matter during post-burial diagenesis can diminish the TOC/TN ratios in sedimentary samples. The latest is associated with a selective degradation of carbon-rich sugars and lipids in plant matter buried. In this way, younger organic matter samples are generally higher in TOC/TN than the older ones (Hodell and Schelske 1998). In absence of post-burial processes, the δ13C and TOC/TN values suggest a greater input of terrestrial organic matter towards the end of this fluvial stage (Meyers and Teranes 2002) (Fig. 7a). In addition, the presence of vascular plant remains and amorphous organic matter suggest the development of soil and vegetation around the water body.
Fluvial-lacustrine transition stage
From 306.5 to 294 m depth, the facies are constituted by MS, CSG, LS, STS, DO and MSG. The principal characteristic of this stage is the novel presence of diatoms (Fig. 8). Our age model suggests that these sediments are older than 400 ± 46 ka. This interval was divided into three sub-stages.
Sub-stage 1 (Sub1)
The first sub-stage deposits span from 306.5 to 302.8 m depth. The interval is characterized by a transitional fining upward contact from CGS to LS facies that suggests a decrease in the transport energy.
There are intercalations of laminated sediments of DO facies, which have high diatom content (90%) and a minor proportion of well-sorted silt (10%). Diatoms from association A (Staurosira, Rhopalodia and Cocconeis), are present between 306.8 and 302.8 m depth (Fig. 8). Several authors have observed that small species of the family Fragilariaceae, such as Staurosira, are facultative planktonic taxa that can be fast colonizers after environmental disruptions (Vos and de Wolf 1988; Gell et al. 2002; Augustinus et al. 2008). Both Cocconeis and Rhopalodia are epiphytic forms that suggest shallow-water conditions (Gasse et al. 1997).
Multiple factors control the δ15N of bulk lacustrine organic matter, such as source, depositional environment and diagenetic changes. However, an increasing number of study suggests that lower values of δ15N show more intense denitrification processes and point to more oxic environments (Hollander et al. 1992; Brenner et al. 1999; Talbot and Lædak 2000; Talbot 2001; Zhong et al. 2017). The limited δ15N results (δ15N: 2.8–3.0‰) are coherent with a relatively shallow and oligotrophic lake (Fig. 7d). Characteristics of this sub-stage indicate fluctuating conditions, but a trend from proximal littoral facies toward the formation of a shallow, oligotrophic and probable oxic lake, which we call “Paleo-Chalco-I” (Fig. 8).
Presence of a 10-cm carbonate layer (aragonite and calcite) at 303.8 m depth suggests that Paleo-Chalco-I became a highly concentrated shallow water body. Deposits overlying the carbonate layer (303.8–302.8 m depth) are characterized by an increase in Cocconeis and Navicula, and later rise in planktonic species characteristic of diatom association B (Stephanodiscus and Aulacoseira) (Fig. 8). This shift in diatom assemblages suggests evolution to a deeper eutrophic lake (Edlund and Kingston 2004; Bennion and Simpson 2011; Gabito et al. 2013). Additionally, TN data (0.01–0.08%) and the TOC/TN ratio (8.0–11.2) indicate a mix of terrestrial and aquatic organic material input (Fig. 7c).
Sub-stage 2 (Sub2)
A second sub-stage, between 302.8 and 296.2 m depth, is characterized by a transitional coarsening upward from the DO deposit to the CSG facies. The DO facies is dominated by diatoms of association A (Staurosira and Cocconeis), which are indicative of shallow-water conditions, particularly between 299.3 and 298.3 m depth (Fig. 8). The presence of rounded and well-sorted gravel in CSG, as well as transitional changes between CSG and DO facies, indicate periodic changes in lake level and in-lake migration of littoral facies. Our Q/(Q + F) data indicate wet conditions during this sub-stage. However, because of limited data resolution, we cannot correlate changes in humidity with littoral facies migration. A recent geomorphological study of abandoned Chalco shorelines revealed large sand and gravel deposits associated with river deltas during the last 7000 years (Frederick and Cordova 2019), suggesting that there is no simple correlation between climate and sedimentation. The evidence indicates that Paleo-Chalco-I had a lower lake level during sub-stage 2, and that littoral facies were deposited at the drill site, dominated by well-sorted and rounded coarse size fractions (gravels and sands), as result of wave action in the lake. During this generally low lake period, an intermittent shallow and oligotrophic lake developed.
Sub-stage 3 (Sub3)
A third sub-stage, between 296.2 and 294.0 m depth, is characterized by high values of magnetic susceptibility (600–1800 10–5 SI) and the presence of subangular to rounded and poorly sorted clasts, 2–10 cm in diameter, in the MSG facies. These characteristics suggest deposition of volcaniclastic material by debris and hyper-concentrated flows that reached the Paleo-Chalco-I, at least at the location of the drill site (Lowe 1982; Smith 1986).
Lacustrine stage
The last stage is characterized by a substantial increase in diatom content of the sediments, as well as the presence of tephra layers in the analyzed sequence and a bivalve coquina deposit. This stage is constituted by DO, CSP, CO, and LS facies. The 85-cm-thick white pumice deposit at 294 m depth, which we name “Tephra CHA16-294,” is overlain by the CO facies, which in turn is covered by the DO and LS facies (Fig. 5H4).
The thickness of CHA16-294 tephra had not previously been observed in the Chalco lacustrine sequence. The thickest tephra layer (35 cm) recorded in the younger sediments of Lake Chalco is a deposit from a Plinian eruption that occurred ca. 17 cal ka BP and came from Popocatepetl (50 km from the drill site), whose major dispersion axes was in the direction of Chalco (Sosa-Ceballos et al. 2012; Ortega-Guerrero et al. 2018). The source of tephra CHA16-294 is unknown, but its thickness and mineralogy suggest it came from eruption of nearby stratovolcanoes. Based on the estimated age for the CHA16-294 tephra (400 ± 46 ka) and known regional volcanic activity (Table 3), we suggest that it may be associated with activity in the Iztaccihuatl volcanic complex, related to the collapse of the Los Pies cone (Garcia-Tenorio 2008; Macias et al. 2012). Regardless of the mechanism and source that produced the CHA16-294 tephra, it is clear that the hydrographic features of the basin changed as a consequence of this volcanic activity and helped establish a second lacustrine phase after ca. 400 ka, which we name “Paleo-Chalco-II”.
Above the CHA16-294 tephra (293.1 m depth), there is a gradual change to a unique coquina deposit that is composed of bivalve, ostracod, and gastropod remains, which indicate that these organisms were abundant in the lake during its initial filling (Fig. 4g). Presence of gastropods and bivalves suggests that Paleo-Chalco-II was initially a carbonate-rich shallow lake (Tavares et al. 2015).
Microalgae such as Pediastrum and Coelastrum were found at the top of the coquina facies deposit (291.9 m). Pediastrum and Coelastrum have been reported as indicators of eutrophic conditions (Janssen and Ijzermans-Lutgerhorst 1973; Whitney and Mayle 2012; Acosta-Noriega 2019). These algae suggest that after the deposition of the coquina, water level in Paleo-Chalco-II rose and the water body became eutrophic. This inference is supported by the δ15N (> 6.8‰) and δ13C (< – 25.7‰) values, which suggest a deeper and more productive lake (Fig. 7d).
From the top of the coquina deposit (291.9 m) to 285 m depth, a significant increase in association B diatoms (Stephanodiscus niagarae and Aulacoseira) suggests an increase in water depth (Fig. 8). Stephanodiscus niagarae is a species that was abundant in Lake Chalco during glacial stages such as Marine Isotopic Stages 2 and 6 (Avendaño-Villeda et al. 2018). This would suggest that Paleo-Chalco-II formed during a cold interval, which according to our age model, correlates with Marine Isotopic Stage 10 (374 ka) (Lisiecki and Raymo 2005). However, our chronology requires a better age control for sediments, as it is possible that the age of these deposits may be older than MIS10 even MIS12. Such old and cold periods have not yet been known in Central Mexico.
Higher diatom concentrations and TN values in Paleo-Chalco-II than Paleo-Chalco-I suggest an increase in production of aquatic organic matter as a result of large quantities of nutrients entering the water body, possibly associated with the weathering of the volcanic material from tephra CHA16-294 and subsequent ash falls (Tephras CHA16-288, CHA16-289a and CHA16-289b). Volcanic eruptions can promote changes in lacustrine systems. For instance, volcanic material in the water column could reduce available light to photosynthetic organisms, thereby lowering primary production (Barcker et al. 2000). On the other hand, input of nutrients associated with volcanic material can foster increased primary production of diatoms and other algae. This effect has been documented in Lakes Alberta (Canada) and Patzcuaro (Mexico) (Hickman and Reasoner 1994; Telford et al. 2004).
Stratigraphic correlation with previous cores
Previous information regarding the stratigraphy of the lacustrine sequence and the lower rock units in the Basin of Mexico came from deep drillings at sites north of the MexiDrill location (Fig. 9; Oviedo de Leon 1967; Arce et al. 2013). At the “San Lorenzo Tezonco” core (17.6 km northwest of Chalco), lacustrine deposits were found between the surface and 70 m depth; in addition, microalgae such as Pediastrum and Botryococcus were encountered in several samples of lacustrine clay from 604 to 590 m depth, and dated to > 250 ka (Lozano-Garcia and Sosa-Najera 2015). This was interpreted to indicate a deep and eutrophic water body. In the “Texcoco” core (24.3 km north of Chalco), lacustrine deposits were reported from 485 m depth to the surface; presence of clay layers with microalgae such as Botryococcus, Pediastrum and pollen of aquatic taxa as Potamogeton in several samples between 642 and 425 m depth, suggests the presence of an ancient water body in a wet environment (Lozano-Garcia and Sosa-Najera 2015). Palynological, stratigraphic and chronological data from the San Lorenzo Tezonco and Texcoco cores suggest that a correlation exists between clay deposits reported by Lozano-Garcia and Sosa-Najera (2015), and sediments from Paleo-Chalco-I (Fig. 9).
Regional implications
Lake Chalco sediments provide a unique archive of long-term record of climatic variability. Our data suggest that the formation of the lake occurred ca. 400 ka ago, which implies that the drill-core sequence recovered is the longest late Quaternary lacustrine record from the North American tropics. The analyzed section of the MexiDrill record (343–285 m depth) allows us to study the formation of a lake in volcanic settings such as the Basin of Mexico.
Gradual changes in the sedimentary environments (alluvial and fluvial) dominated the landscape of the southern Basin of Mexico before the establishment of a lacustrine environment. Paleo-Chalco-II settlement is clearly linked to a major volcanic event, after which the lake deepened and its productivity increased. These changes in the lake could be a response to the alteration of the hydrology of the basin caused by the volcanic event. The role of volcanism in the formation of lakes has been also noted in other locations, i.e., Lake Kivu, West Africa (Pasteels et al. 1989) and Laacher See, Germany (Park and Schmincke 1997). In both cases, deposits from volcanic eruptions blocked fluvial systems and/or diverted the natural runoff in the basins.
The stratigraphy and evolution of the Basin of Mexico has been extensively studied through surficial geology and previous drill cores. Volcanic stratigraphy since the Miocene has been developed from outcrops (e.g., Enciso de la Vega 1992; Siebe et al. 2005; Jaimes-Viera et al. 2018; Arce et al. 2019), and the drill cores have provided a knowledge of the general stratigraphy of the upper 3 km (Oviedo de León 1967; Pérez-Cruz 1988; Arce et al. 2015). However, because of discontinuous sediment recovery in the drillings, as well as the lack of outcrops of fluvial and alluvial materials underlying the lacustrine deposits, the alluvial-lacustrine transition is for the first time reported in this work.
Conclusions
Sediment between 343 and 285 m depth in the MEXI-CHA16 1C core is composed of three facies groups: (1) Detrital (Laminated Silt [LS], Massive Sand [MS], Stratified Silty Sand [STS], Clast-Supported Gravel [CSG], Matrix-Supported Gravel [MSG]); (2) Biogenic (Diatom Ooze [DO], Coquina [CO]), and (3) Volcaniclastic (Clast-Supported Pumice [CSP]). We identified four environmental stages in the deposit: (1) alluvial (343–330 m depth), (2) fluvial (330–306.5 m depth), (3) transitional fluvial-lacustrine (306.5–294 m depth), and (4) lacustrine (294–285 m depth). During the alluvial stage, debris flows and hyper-concentrated flows dominated; streamflows and floodplain deposits characterized the fluvial stage; in the transitional stage, there were lacustrine and littoral deposits. Finally, volcanic and lacustrine deposits dominated during the lacustrine stage. During the formation of Lake Chalco, there were two lake periods: Paleo-Chalco-I, when a nutrient-poor and shallow water body prevailed, and Paleo-Chalco-II, when a eutrophic and deep lake existed.
Formation of Paleo-Chalco-II seems to have been associated with volcanic activity, which could modify the basin morphology, increased nutrient content in the lake and deposited the tephra layer CHA16-294. The thickness of CHA16-294 tephra (85 cm) is peculiar, since this is the thickest tephra known in the Chalco lacustrine sequence. It is likely that tephra CHA16-294 was the result of the collapse of Los Pies cone on the Iztaccihuatl volcanic complex. However, more studies are required to test this hypothesis.
Our data indicates that Lake Chalco was formed during a cold interval ~ 400 ± 46 ka ago, which could correlate with Marine Isotopic Stage 10 (374 ka). As we refine the age control for these sediments, the Chalco Basin will provide insights into global climate changes during key transitions, such as between Marine Isotope Stages 10 and 9, and even Marine Isotope Stages 12 and 11.
Although the emplacement of volcanic deposits in the Basin of Mexico since Miocene, and the recent depositional history at Lake Chalco (last 143 ka) have been widely studied, a gap of information existed between the volcanic landscape and the lacustrine onset. This work is a link between those scenarios and a clue in the recent evolution of the Basin of Mexico. Finally, this paper provides a wide range of open questions to be explored and answered in future research (e.g., refine sampling, enhance the age-depth model, describe < 285 m depth sediments, analyze tephra deposits, etc.).
References
Acosta-Noriega E (2019) Análisis palinológico de una secuencia lacustre de 130,000 a 103,000 años A.P. del lago de Chalco, México. Dissertation, National Autonomous University of Mexico
Aguirre-Díaz GJ, López-Martínez M, Rendón-Márquez G (2006) La Caldera de La Catedral, Sierra de Las Cruces, una caldera al norponiente de la Ciudad de México. Reunión Anual de la Unión Geofísica Mexicana: Puerto Vallarta, Jal. México GEOS 26:160–161
Arce JL, Macías JL, Vázquez-Selem L (2003) The 10.5 ka Plinian eruption of Nevado de Toluca volcano, Mexico: Stratigraphy and hazard implications. Geological Society of America Bulletin 115(2): 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2003)115%3C0230:TKPEON%3E2.0.CO;2
Arce JL, Macías R, Palomo AG, Capra L, Macías JL, Layer P, Rueda H (2008) Late Pleistocene flank collapse of Zempoala Volcano (Central Mexico) and the role of fault reactivation. J Volcanol Geoth Res 177(4):944–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.07.015
Arce JL, Layer PW, Morales-Casique E, Benowitz JA, Rangel E, Escolero O (2013) New constraints on the subsurface geology of the Mexico City Basin: The San Lorenzo Tezonco deep well, on the basis of 40Ar/39Ar geochronology and whole-rock chemistry. J Volcanol Geoth Res 266:34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2013.09.004
Arce JL, Layer P, Martínez I, Salinas JI, Macías-Romo MDC, Morales-Casique E, Lenhardt N (2015) Geología y estratigrafía del pozo profundo San Lorenzo Tezonco y de sus alrededores, sur de la Cuenca de México. Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana 67(2): 123–143. Disponible en: <http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-33222015000200002&lng=es&nrm=iso>. ISSN 1405–3322.
Arce JL, Layer PW, Macías JL, Morales-Casique E, García-Palomo A, Jiménez-Domínguez FJ et al (2019) Geology and stratigraphy of the Mexico Basin (Mexico City), central Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. J Maps 15(2):320–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2019.1593251
Augustinus P, Bleakley N, Deng Y, Shane P, Cochran U (2008) Rapid change in early Holocene environments inferred from lake Pupuke, Auckland city, New Zealand. J Quatern Sci 23(5):435–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.1153
Avendaño-Villeda DA, Caballero M, Ortega-Guerrero B, Lozano-García S, Brown E (2018) Condiciones ambientales a finales del Estadio Isotópico 6 (EI 6:> 130000 años) en el centro de México: caracterización de una sección de sedimentos laminados proveniente del Lago de Chalco. Revista mexicana de ciencias geológicas 35(2): 168–178. https://doi.org/10.22201/cgeo.20072902e.2018.2.649
Barker P, Telford R, Merdaci O, Williamson D, Taieb M, Vincens A, Gibert E (2000) The sensitivity of a Tanzanian crater lake to catastrophic tephra input and four millennia of climate change. Holocene 10(3): 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1191/095968300672848582
Batten DJ (1999) Small Palynomorphs. In: Jones TP, Rowe NP (eds) Fossil Plants and Spores: Modern techniques. The Geological Society, London, pp 15–19
Bennion H, Simpson GL (2011) The use of diatom records to establish reference conditions for UK lakes subject to eutrophication. J Paleolimnol 45:469–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-010-9422-8
Beverage JP, Culbertson JK (1964) Hyperconcentrations of suspended sediment. J Hydraul Div 90(6):117–128
Blaauw M, Christen JA (2011) Flexible paleoclimate age-depth models using an autoregressive gamma process. Bayesian Anal 6(3):457–474. https://doi.org/10.1214/11-BA618
Bloomfield KA (1975) Late-Quaternary monogenetic volcano field in central Mexico. Geol Rundsch 64:476–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01820679
Brenner M, Whitmore TJ, Curtis JH, Hodell DA, Schelske CL (1999) Stable isotope (δ13C and δ15N) signatures of sedimented organic matter as indicators of historic lake trophic state. J Paleolimnol 22(2):205–221. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008078222806
Brown ET, Caballero M, Cabral Cano E, Fawcett PJ, Lozano-García S, Ortega B et al (2019) Scientific drilling of Lake Chalco, Basin of Mexico (MexiDrill). Scient Drill. https://doi.org/10.5194/sd-7-1-2019
Caballero M, Guerrero B (1998) Lake Levels since about 40,000 Years Ago at Lake Chalco, near Mexico City. Quatern Res 50(1):69–79. https://doi.org/10.1006/qres.1998.1969
Caballero M, Lozano-García S, Ortega-Guerrero B, Correa-Metrio A (2019) Quantitative estimates of orbital and millennial scale climatic variability in central Mexico during the last∼ 40,000 years. Quatern Sci Rev 205:62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.12.002
Cao R, Qian S (1990) Sediment transport characteristics of hyperconcentrated flow with suspended load. In: French R (ed) Hydraulics/Hydrology of Arid Lands (H2AL). American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp 657–662
Cronin SJ, Neall VE, Lecointre JA, Palmer AS (1999) Dynamic interactions between lahars and stream flow: A case study from Ruapehu volcano, New Zealand. Geol Soc Am Bull 111(1):28–38. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1999)111%3C0028:DIBLAS%3E2.3.CO;2
Delgado-Granados H, Cassatta W, Gisbert Pinto G, Paul R (2017) Historia geológica y eruptiva del volcán Popopocatepetl. In: del Pozzo M (ed) Estudios geológicos y actualización del mapa de peligros del volcán Popocatépetl, 1st edn. Instituto de Geología, Ciudad de México, pp 13–17
Edlund MB, Kingston JC (2004) Expanding sediment diatom reconstruction model to eutrophic southern Minnesota lakes. In: Heiskary S (eds) Final report to Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. CFMS Contract, Minneapolis, 32
Enciso-De la Vega S (1992) Propuesta de nomenclatura estratigráfica para la cuenca de México. Revista Geofísica Internacional 10(1):26–36
Frederick CD, Cordova CE (2019) Prehispanic and colonial landscape change and fluvial dynamics in the Chalco Region, Mexico. Geomorphology 331:107–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.10.009
Fries C (1960) Geología del Estado de Morelos y de partes adyacentes de México y Guerrero, región central meridional de México. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México, Ciudad de México
Gabito L, Bonilla S, Antoniales D (2013) Paleolimnological reconstruction of change in a subtropical lake: a comparison of the subfossil record to limnological data. Limnetica 32(2): 175–188. https://doi.org/10.23818/limn.32.15
García-Palomo A, Zamorano JJ, López-Miguel C, Galván-García A, Carlos-Valerio V, Ortega R, Macías JL (2008) El arreglo morfoestructural de la Sierra de Las Cruces, México central. Revista mexicana de ciencias geológicas 25(1): 158–178. Disponible en: <http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1026-87742008000100010&lng=es&nrm=iso>. ISSN 2007–2902.
Garcia-Tenorio F (2008) Avalancha de escombros del Pleistoceno Tardío del cono de los Píes, Complejo Volcánico Iztaccíhuatl. Dissertation, ESIA TICOMAN–IPN
García-Tovar GP, Martínez-Serrano RG (2011) Geology and geochemistry of the Pleistocene lava flows from the Telapón stratovolcano, Sierra Nevada, México. Revista mexicana de ciencias geológicas 28(2): 301–322. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1026-87742011000200011&lng=es&tlng=en.
Gasse F, Barker P, Gell PA, Fritz SC, Chalie F (1997) Diatom-inferred salinity in palaeolakes: an indirect tracer of climate change. Quatern Sci Rev 16(6):547–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(96)00081-9
Gell P, Sluiter IR, Fluin J (2002) Seasonal and inter-annual variations in diatom assemblages in Murray River-connected wetlands in north-west Victoria, Australia. Mar Freshw Res 53:981–992. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF01021
Google Earth Pro (2020). Fecha de imagen: 01/15/2015. Maxat Technologies Images
Hickman M, Reasoner MA (1994) Diatom responses to late Quaternary vegetation and climate change, and to deposition of two tephras in an alpine and a sub-alpine lake in Yoho National Park, British Columbia. J Paleolimnol 11:173–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00686864
Hodell DA, Schelske CL (1998) Production, sedimentation, and isotopic composition of organic matter in Lake Ontario. Limnol Oceanogr 43(2):200–214. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1998.43.2.0200
Hollander DJ, McKenzie JA, Haven HLT (1992) A 200 year sedimentary record of progressive eutrophication in Lake Greifen (Switzerland): implications for the origin of organic-carbon-rich sediments. Geology 20(9):825–828. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020%3C0825:AYSROP%3E2.3.CO;2
INEGI (2010) Censo de población y vivienda. https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/ccpv/2010/. Accessed 10 Jan 2020
INEGI (2020) Continuo Mexicano de Elevaciones; https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/geo2/elevacionesmex/. Accessed 1 Sep 2020
Ingersoll TF, Bullard RL, Ford JP, Grimm JD, Pickle SW, Sares (1984) The effect of grain size on detrital modes: a test of the Gazzi-Dickinson point-counting method. J Sediment Res 54(1):103–116. https://doi.org/10.1306/212F83B9-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D
Jaimes-Viera MC, Del Pozzo AM, Layer PW, Benowitz JA, Nieto-Torres A (2018) Timing the evolution of a monogenetic volcanic field: Sierra Chichinautzin, Central Mexico. J Volcanol Geoth Res 356:225–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.03.013
Janssen CR, Ijzermans-Lutgerhorst W (1973) A “local” late-glacial pollen diagram from Limburg, Netherlands. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 22:213–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1973.tb00835.x
Lespez L, Le Drezen Y, Garnier A, Rasse M, Eichhorn B, Ozainne S et al (2011) High-resolution fluvial records of Holocene environmental changes in the Sahel: the Yamé River at Ounjougou (Mali, West Africa). Quatern Sci Rev 30(5–6):737–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.12.021
Lisiecki LE, Raymo ME (2005) A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records. Paleoceanography 20:1003. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001071
Lowe D (1982) Sediment gravity flows: Depositional models with special reference to the deposits of high-density turbidity currents. J Sediment Res 52(1):279–297. https://doi.org/10.1306/212F7F31-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D
Lozano-García S, Sosa-Nájera S (2015) Análisis palinológico del Cenozoico de la cuenca de México: el registro polínico de los pozos Texcoco-I y San Lorenzo Tezonco. Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana 67(2): 245–253. Recuperado en 25 de enero de 2020, de http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-33222015000200009&lng=es&tlng=es
Lozano-García S, Ortega B, Roy P, Beramendi-Orosco L, Caballero M (2015) Climatic variability in the northern sector of the American tropics since the latest MIS 3. Quatern Res 84(2):262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yqres.2015.07.002
Lozano-García S, Brown ET, Ortega B, Caballero M, Werne J, Fawcett PJ, Schwalb A, Valero-Garcés BL, Schnurrenberger D, et al (2017) Deep drilling at the Chalco lake: a technical report. Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana 69(2): 299–311. https://doi.org/10.18268/bsgm2017v69n2a2
Lozano-Garcı́a MS, Ortega-Guerrero B, Caballero-Miranda M, Urrutia-Fucugauchi J (1993) Late Pleistocene and Holocene paleoenvironments of Chalco lake, central Mexico. Quatern Res 40(3): 332-342. https://doi.org/10.1006/qres.1993.1086
Lugo-Hubp J, Mooser F, Pérez-Vega A, Zamorano-Orozco J (1994) Geomorfologia de la sierra de Santa Catarina México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas 11(1):13–52
Macías JL, Arce JL, García-Tenorio F, Layer PW, Rueda H, Reyes-Agustin G, López-Pizaña F, Avellán D (2012) Geology and geochronology of Tlaloc, Telapón, Iztaccíhuatl, and Popocatépetl volcanoes, Sierra Nevada, central Mexico, In: Aranda-Gómez JJ, Tolson G, Molina-Garza RS (eds) The Southern Cordillera and Beyond. Geological Society of America Field Guide 25, Mexico City, 163–193
Márquez A, Verma SP, Anguita F, Oyarzun R, Brandle JL (1999) Tectonics and volcanism of Sierra Chichinautzin: extension at the front of the Central Trans-Mexican Volcanic belt. J Volcanol Geoth Res 93(1–2):125–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0273(99)00085-2
Martin del Pozzo AL (1982) Monogenetic vulcanism in sierra Chichinautzin Mexico. Bull Volcanol. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600386
Martínez-Abarca R, Lozano-García S, Ortega-Guerrero B, Caballero-Miranda M (2019) Incendios y actividad volcánica: historia de fuego en la cuenca de México en el Pleistoceno tardío con base en registros de material carbonizado en el lago de Chalco. Revista mexicana de ciencias geológicas 36(2): 259–269. https://doi.org/10.22201/cgeo.20072902e.2019.2.1090
Meyers PA, Teranes JL (2002) Sediment organic matter. In: Last WM, Smol JP (eds) and Tracking environmental change using lake sediments. Springer, Dordrech, pp 239–269
Meyers PA, Leenheer MJ, Bourboniere, (1995) Diagenesis of vascular plant organic matter components during burial in lake sediments. Aq Geochem 1:35–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01025230
Miall AD (2012) The geology of fluvial deposits: sedimentary facies, basin analysis, and petroleum geology, 4th edn. Springer, New York
Mooser F (1963) Historia tectónica de la Cuenca de México. Boletín de la Asociación Mexicana de Geólogos Petroleros 15:239–245
Mooser F, Nairn AE, Negendank JF (1974) Palaeomagnetic investigations of the tertiary and quaternary igneous rocks: VIII a palaeomagnetic and petrologic study of volcanics of the valley of Mexico. Geol Rundsch 63(2):451–483
Mora Álvarez G, Caballero Miranda C, Urrutia Fucugauchi J, Uchiumi S (1991) Southward migration of volcanic activity in the Sierra de Las Cruces, basin of Mexico?-a preliminary K-Ar dating and palaeomagnetic study. Geofísica Internacional https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.00167169p.1991.30.2.1134
Niederberger BC (1987) Paleopaysages et Archeologie PreUrbaine du Bassin de Mexico: Tome I. Collection D’Etudes Mesoamericaines, Mexico City
Nixon GT (1989) The Geology of Iztaccíhuatl volcano and adjacent areas of the Sierra Nevada and Valley of Mexico. Geolog Soc Am Special Papers 219:1–59
Ortega-Guerrero B, Newton AJ (1998) Geochemical characterization of Late Pleistocene and Holocene tephra layers from the Basin of Mexico. Central Mexico Quatern Res 50(1):90–106. https://doi.org/10.1006/qres.1998.1975
Ortega-Guerrero B, Lozano-García S, Herrera-Hernández D, Caballero M, Beramendi-Orosco L, Bernal JP et al (2017) Lithostratigraphy and physical properties of lacustrine sediments of the last ca. 150 kyr from Chalco basin, central México. J S Am Earth Sci 79:507–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2017.09.003
Ortega-Guerrero B, García LC, Linares-López C (2018) Tephrostratigraphy of the late Quaternary record from Lake Chalco, central México. J S Am Earth Sci 81:122–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2017.11.009
Ortega-Guerrero B, Avendaño D, Caballero M, Lozano-García S, Brown ET et al (2020) Climatic control on magnetic mineralogy during the late MIS 6-Early MIS 3 in Lake Chalco, central Mexico. Quatern Sci Rev 230:106–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106163
Ortiz-Enriquez O. (2017) Petrografía y geoquímica del vulcanismo monogenético de la Sierra de Santa Catarina, Cuenca de México. Dissertation, Autonomous University of Guerrero
Osete ML, RuizMartı́nez VC, Caballero C, Galindo C, UrrutiaFucugauchi J, Tarling DH (2000) Southward migration of continental volcanic activity in the Sierra de Las Cruces, Mexico: palaeomagnetic and radiometric evidence. Tectonophysics 318 (1-4): 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00312-1
Oviedo de León A (1967) Estudio geológico del subsuelo, basado en los datos obtenidos de la perforación del pozo profundo Texcoco No. 1. Instituto Mexicano de Petróleo, Departamento de Geología y Exploración, Ciudad de México
Park C, Schmincke HU (1997) Lake formation and catastrophic dam burst during the Late Pleistocene Laacher See eruption (Germany). Naturwissenschaften 84(12):521–525
Pasteels P, Villeneuve M, De Paepe P, Klerkx J (1989) Timing of the volcanism of the southern Kivu province: implications for the evolution of the western branch of the East African Rift system. Earth Planet Sci Lett 94:353–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(89)90152-0
Perez-Cruz GA (1988) Estudio sismológico de reflexión del subsuelo de la Ciudad de México. Seismic reflection study of the Mexico City subsoil. Dissertation, National Autonomous University of Mexico
Picard MD (1971) Petrographic criteria for recognition of lacustrine and fluvial sandstone, PR Spring oil-impregnated sandstone area, southeast Uinta Basin. Utah Survey Special Studies 36:28
Pierson TC (1982) Transformation of water flood to debris flow following the eruption-triggered transient-lake breakout from the crater on March 19, 1982. In: Pierson TC (ed) Hydrologic consequences of hot-rock/snowpack interactions at Mount St Helens volcano, U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services, Washington: 19–36
Pierson TC (2005) Hyperconcentrated flow transitional process between water flow and debris flow. In: Jackob M, Hungr O (eds) Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer, Berlin, pp 159–202
R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Rasband WS (2018) ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
Reimer PJ, Bard E, Bayliss A, Beck JW, Blackwell PG, Ramsey CB et al (2013) IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1869–1887. https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16947
Romero-Vera C (2019) Petrografía y geoquímica de los productos volcánicos de la base del pozo MexiDrill, cuenca de Chalco. Dissertation, National Autonomous University of Mexico
Rosiwal A (1898) Über geometrische Gesteinsanalysen; ein einfacher Weg zur ziffermässigen Festellung des Quantitätsverhältnisses der Mineralbestandtheile gemengter Gesteine. Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Koeniglichen Geologischen Reichsanstalt 5(6):143–175
Sanders WT, Parsons JR, Santley RS (1979) The Basin of Mexico: Ecological processes in the evolution of a civilization. Academic Press, New York
Sarocchi D, Borselli L, Macías JL (2005) Construcción de perfiles granulométricos de depósitos piroclásticos por métodos ópticos. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, 22(3): 371–382. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1026-87742005000300371&lng=es&tlng=.
Schnurrenberger D, Russell J, Kelts K (2003) Classification of lacustrine sediments based on sedimentary components. J Paleolimnol 29(2):141–154. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023270324800
Siebe C, Arana-Salinas L, Abrams M (2005) Geology and radiocarbon ages of Tláloc, Tlacotenco, Cuauhtzin, Hijo del Cuauhtzin, Teuhtli, and Ocusacayo monogenetic volcanoes in the central part of the Sierra Chichinautzin, México. J Volcanol Geoth Res 141(3):225–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2004.10.009
Siebe C, Salinas S, Arana-Salinas L, Macías JL, Gardner J, Bonasia R (2017) The ~23,500 y 14C BP White Pumice Plinian eruption and associated debris avalanche and Tochimilco lava flow of Popocatépetl volcano, México. J Volcanol Geoth Res 133:66–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.01.011
Smith GA (1986) Coarse-grained nonmarine volcaniclastic sediment: Terminology and depositional process. Geol Soc Am Bull 97(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1986)97%3C1:CNVSTA%3E2.0.CO;2
Smol JP, Stoermer EF (2010) The diatoms: applications for the environmental and earth sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sohn YK, Rhee CW, Kim BC (1999) Debris flow and hyperconcentrated flood-flow deposits in an alluvial fan, northwestern part of the Cretaceous Yongdong Basin Central Korea. J Geol 107(1):111–132. https://doi.org/10.1086/314334
Sosa-Ceballos G, Gardner JE, Siebe C, Macías JL (2012) A caldera-forming eruption~ 14,100 14C yr BP at Popocatépetl volcano, México: Insights from eruption dynamics and magma mixing. J Volcanol Geoth Res 213:27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2011.11.001
Talbot MR (2001) Nitrogen isotopes in palaeolimnology. In: Last WM, Smol JP (eds) Tracking environmental change using lake sediments. 2nd edn: physical and geochemical methods. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 401–439
Talbot MR, Lærdal T (2000) The Late Pleistocene-Holocene palaeolimnology of Lake Victoria, East Africa, based upon elemental and isotopic analyses of sedimentary organic matter. J Paleolimnol 23(2):141–164. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008029400463
Tavares AC, Borghi L, Corbett P, Nobre-Lopes J, Câmara R (2015) Facies and depositional environments for the coquinas of the Morro do Chaves Formation, Sergipe-Alagoas Basin, defined by taphonomic and compositional criteria Brazilian. J Geol 45(3):415–429. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-488920150030211
Telford RJ, Barker P, Metcalfe S, Newton A (2004) Lacustrine responses to tephra deposition: examples from Mexico. Quatern Sci Rev 23(23–24):2337–2353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2004.03.014
Torres-Rodríguez E, Lozano-García S, Roy P, Ortega B, Beramendi-Orosco L, Correa-Metrio A, Caballero M (2015) Last Glacial droughts and fire regimes in the central Mexican highlands. J Quatern Sci 30(1):88–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.2761
Van de Kamp PC (2010) Arkose, subarkose, quartz sand, and associated muds derived from felsic plutonic rocks in glacial to tropical humid climates. J Sediment Res 80(10):895–905. https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2010.081
Vos PC, De Wolf H (1988) Methodological aspects of paleo-ecological diatom research in coastal areas of the Netherlands. Geol Mijnbouw 67(1):31–40
Weltje GJ (1994) Provenance and dispersal of sand-sized sediments: reconstruction of dispersal patterns and sources of sand-sized sediments by means of inverse modelling techniques. Utrecht University, Netherlands
Whitney BS, Mayle FE (2012) Pediastrum species as potential indicators of lake-level change in tropical South America. J Paleolimnol 47(4):601–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-012-9583-8
Zhong W, Wei Z, Chen Y, Shang S, Xue J, Ouyang J et al (2017) A 15.4-ka paleoclimate record inferred from δ 13 C and δ 15 N of organic matter in sediments from the sub-alpine Daping Swamp, western Nanling Mountains South China. J Paleolimnol 57(2):127–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-016-9935-x
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by: UNAM DGAPA-PAPIIT IV100215 and IN105918, the International Continental Scientific Drilling Program (ICDP Project 05-2014), the US National Science Foundation (NSF-EAR1551311, NFS-EAR1803725), the CONACYT National Scholarship Program (CVU/Student: 854008/629653). Special thanks to the local authorities of Ejido Santiago Tulyehualco and the MexiDrill Team, who assisted with many aspects of the field work. We thank the LacCore staff and others who helped with sediment analyses: Susana Sosa Najera, Cecilia Caballero, Ana Ma. Soler, Sandra García León, Elena Royo, Raquel López, Cinta Osácar and Jaime Díaz Ortega. Rodrigo Martínez thanks UNAM’s Academic Writing Program for its guidance in the preparation of this manuscript. We appreciate the comments and corrections of Dr. Mark Brenner and an anonymous reviewer that improved the early manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martínez-Abarca, R., Ortega-Guerrero, B., Lozano-García, S. et al. Sedimentary stratigraphy of Lake Chalco (Central Mexico) during its formative stages. Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) 110, 2519–2539 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-020-01964-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-020-01964-z