Abstract
Background
The short-term safety and efficacy of insertion of a self-expandable metallic colonic stent (SEMS) followed by elective surgery, “bridge to surgery (BTS)”, for malignant large bowel obstruction (MLBO) have been well described; however, the influence on long-term oncological outcomes is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in oncological characteristics in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues after SEMS insertion, focusing on growth factors, cell cycle and apoptosis.
Methods
From January 2013 to September 2014, a total of 25 patients with MLBO who underwent BTS at our single institution were retrospectively included. Paired CRC tissue samples before (endoscopic biopsy) and after SEMS insertion (surgically resected) were collected from each patient. EGFR, VEGF, Ki-67, p27kip1 and TUNEL expression were determined by immunohistochemistry.
Results
No clinical or subclinical perforations evaluated by mechanical ulceration pathologically were observed. Epithelial exfoliation, tumour necrosis, infiltration of inflammatory cells and fibrosis were observed in SEMS-inserted surgically-resected specimens. Overall, 84% (21/25) and 60% (15/25) of patients exhibited no change or a decrease in staining category, respectively, for EGFR and VEGF expression after SEMS insertion. A significant decrease in Ki-67 expression was observed in surgically-resected specimens compared with endoscopic biopsy specimens (P < 0.01). The upstream cell cycle inhibitor, p27kip1, was significantly increased after SEMS insertion (P = 0.049).
Conclusions
Although the long-term safety of BTS should be determined in a future clinical trial, mechanical compression by SEMS may suppress cancer cell proliferation and this result could provide some insights into the issue.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
It is estimated that colorectal cancer (CRC) was the most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in Japan in 2015. Previous reports demonstrated that 8–29% of patients with primary CRC present with an emergent obstruction at the time of diagnosis, which in turn accounts for 85% of colonic emergencies [1,2,3]. In the past, malignant large bowel obstruction (MLBO), a life-threatening oncological trauma, has been managed by emergency surgical decompression. It frequently requires temporary or permanent colostomy, with high mortality and morbidity rates (7–22% and 30–60%, respectively) [2, 4, 5]. These high morbidity and mortality rates are because of patients’ poor general condition and unprepared intestine [2, 4]. Colostomy impairs quality of life, and only 60% of patients who undergo Hartmann’s procedure also undergo colostomy closure [6].
Since the first report by Dohmoto in 1991 from Japan, which demonstrated the effective placement of a self-expandable metallic colonic stent (SEMS) for the relief of colonic obstruction, insertion of SEMS is currently recognized as an optimal alternative intervention for decompression of MLBO [7]. Although it was initially proposed as a palliative treatment for MLBO, stenting is also increasingly being used as a ‘bridge to surgery’ (BTS) in potentially curable disease to convert high risk emergency surgery to elective one-stage radical surgery with waiting times optimized for a patient’s general condition [8, 9]. Previous systematic reviews have shown more favourable short-term outcomes of the BTS strategy than emergency surgery alone in terms of morbidity, stoma creation, primary anastomosis and length of postoperative hospital stay [10,11,12].
The major concern of the BTS strategy is the influence on long-term oncological outcomes. Some studies demonstrated worse survival and higher local recurrence rates in BTS-treated patients compared with emergency surgery, however, our recent meta-analysis demonstrated relatively equivalent oncological outcomes [13,14,15]. Currently, data from reliable randomized controlled trials evaluating this issue are not available. Theoretically, perforation and mechanical manipulation induced by SEMS could have a negative impact on oncological outcomes. In terms of perforation, previous studies demonstrated that SEMS-induced intestinal perforation was a strong risk factor for local recurrence and dissemination [16, 17]. In contrast, some pilot studies evaluated the histological findings after SEMS insertion in MLBO patients [18,19,20,21], however, no studies investigating the oncological influences, including tumour growth and progression, of SEMS-induced mechanical manipulation have been reported to date. Thus, this concern is currently at the centre of a controversy.
The aim of this in vivo retrospective study was to evaluate changes in CRC tissues after SEMS insertion, focusing on growth factors, cell cycle and apoptosis. The results of this study could provide insights into this unresolved issue.
Materials and methods
Study patients
This single-institutional retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital (Chiba, Japan) (approval No. 514) and was performed in accordance with the principles contained within the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. From January 2013 to September 2014, a total of 25 patients with MLBO resulting from primary CRC who underwent the BTS strategy (SEMS insertion followed by primary tumour resection) in our department were included. A diagnosis of MLBO was made according to the following characteristics on admission: (1) clinical symptoms of abdominal distention, pain and constipation, (2) CT scan findings of dilatation of the colon without intestinal perforation and (3) endoscopic and pathological confirmation of an obstructive primary colorectal tumour.
The patients’ demographic baseline and surgical variables were retrospectively collected.
Endoscopic stenting and surgical procedures
Urgent colonoscopy for MLBO was performed to evaluate the obstructing tumour and to obtain a biopsy specimen. Water-soluble contrast medium via endoscopy was concomitantly injected to confirm the length and morphology of the tumour. Under fluoroscopic and endoscopic guidance, a guide wire (0.035 inches in diameter) was introduced through the tumour beyond the point of the obstruction and proximally to the distended colon. The SEMS, WallFlex Colonic Stent (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) or Niti-S Colonic Stent (Taewoong Medical Inc., Gimpo-si, Korea), was developed over the wire. All SEMSs were bare (uncovered). Radiological examination was performed the day after SEMS insertion to rule out intestinal perforation and confirm the position and expansion of the SEMS. All endoscopic SEMS insertion procedures were performed by a single expert physician (A.M.).
After the waiting period from SEMS insertion, various surgical procedures were performed to resect the primary lesions of enrolled patients. All of the included patients underwent successful SEMS insertion with biopsy specimen extraction and achieved sufficient intestinal decompression followed by elective surgery. All surgeries were performed by board-certified colorectal surgeons with equivalent experience in the surgical treatment of CRC.
Pathological examination
Fresh cancer tissue obtained by endoscopic biopsy and surgical resection were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 h. Consecutive 4-µm tissue sections were cut from paraffin-embedded blocks. Considering that the aim of this study was to investigate the alterations in oncological characteristics after SEMS insertion, and that these characteristics are heterogeneous in CRC, the examined region of the endoscopic biopsy and paired surgically-resected specimen from each patient should be consistent, which makes it possible to evaluate the direct influence of mechanical manipulation of SEMS. The tissue sections from the anal-sided round wall of the tumour, which is routinely obtained by endoscopic biopsy, of the surgically-resected specimens were provided for further experiments.
Routine haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed to evaluate the histopathological characteristics of the tumours. Immunohistochemical staining (IHC) according to the avidin biotin procedure was performed using the following primary antibodies: anti-VEGF (IBL, Gunma, Japan), anti-EGFR (EGFR pharmDx kit; DAKO, Carpinteria, CA), anti-Ki-67 (DAKO) and anti-p27kip1 (DAKO). In each analysis, CRC samples previously shown to stain with these antibodies were used as positive controls. Phosphate-buffered saline in place of the primary antibody was used as a negative control. To detect apoptotic cancer cells, TUNEL staining using a specific kit (Roche Life Science, Mannheim, Germany) was performed.
Assessment of immunohistochemical staining
Cytoplasmic immunoreactivity for VEGF was evaluated according to the extent of staining, with staining intensities scored as: 0, no cells stained; 1, less than 10% of cell stained; 2, 11–50% of cells stained; 3, more than 50% of cells stained [22]. EGFR expression was shown as membranous staining of cancer cells and the intensity of the staining was categorized as follows: IHC negative (no staining), IHC 1+ (incomplete circumferential staining: weak), IHC 2+ (complete circumferential staining: moderate) and IHC 3+ (complete strong circumferential staining: strong) [23]. For nuclear Ki-67, p27 kip1 expression, and TUNEL staining, the percentage of positive cells from at least 1000 cancer cells from three randomly-selected fields of vision using a high power lens (× 400) were calculated [24]. The slides were reviewed by pathologists, who had no prior knowledge of the clinical characteristics of each patient. However, complete blindness of the slides was impossible, because slides derived from endoscopic biopsy or surgically-resected samples are easily distinguishable by their morphology.
Statistical analysis
Continuous data of Ki-67, p27 kip1, and TUNEL staining are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The two-tailed Student’s t test was used to compare continuous variables. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The scores of VEGF and EGFR staining were categorized by the alterations in the staining of the surgically-resected sample compared with the endoscopic biopsy sample in each patient, as follows: up (increased), no change and down (decreased).
All statistical analyses were performed with R, version 3.1.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Results
Patients’ characteristics
The clinical characteristics and SEMS-related variables of the 25 enrolled patients are shown in Table 1. Fourteen (56%) patients were male and 11 (44%) were female. The mean patient age was 64 years. The tumours of six patients (24%) were located in the right-sided colon. The majority of inserted SEMSs were Niti-S (22; 88%), 22 mm in diameter (24; 96%) and 6 cm in length (19; 76%). Clinical success of intestinal decompression was achieved in all patients (25; 100%) without any SEMS-related complications including clinical perforation. The mean duration from SEMS insertion to elective surgery was 15.6 days.
The pathological characteristics of the enrolled patients are shown in Table 2. All 25 patients were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma, and most (22; 88%) were well and moderately differentiated. The depth of all tumours was beyond the muscularis propia. Fifteen patients (60%) were T3 and ten patients (40%) were T4. The majority of tumours presented lymphatic and venous invasion (24; 96% and 21; 84%, respectively). Perineural invasion was identified in 15 patients (60%). SEMS-induced mechanical ulceration reached the submucosa in 7 (28%) patients, muscularis propia in 17 (68%) and subserosa in 1 (4%) patient. That is, no subclinical perforation was observed pathologically. The pathological findings of SEMS-inserted surgically-resected specimens included epithelial exfoliation, tumour necrosis, infiltration of inflammatory cells and fibrosis (Fig. 1A, B).
SEMS-induced changes in oncological molecular markers
Changes in the oncological characteristics of CRC following SEMS-induced mechanical manipulation were evaluated by comparison with the immunohistochemical expression levels of growth factors, cell cycle-related proteins, and apoptosis factors in paired endoscopic biopsy and surgically-resected specimens. Representative images of immunohistochemical staining for membranous EGFR, cytoplasmic VEGF, nuclear Ki-67 and nuclear p27kip1 are shown in Fig. 2A–D. EGFR expression demonstrated no significant difference between the paired samples (P = 0.057). However, only four patients (16%) exhibited an increase in staining category, and the majority (21; 84%) of patients showed no change or a decrease in category after SEMS insertion. Regarding VEGF expression, there was no significant difference in staining category between the paired samples (P = 0.244). While 15 patients (60%) demonstrated no change or decrease in category, 10 patients (40%) showed an increase (Table 3).
A significant decrease in Ki-67 expression was observed in surgically-resected specimens compared with paired endoscopic biopsy specimens (34.0 ± 5.9% and 49.4 ± 7.6%, respectively, P < 0.01), which may suggest that SEMS suppressed cancer cell proliferation (Fig. 3A). Next, to explore the mechanism by which there was a significant suppression of Ki-67 expression after SEMS insertion, we investigated the upstream cell cycle inhibitor, p27kip1, before and after insertion. Expression was significantly increased in surgically-resected specimens compared with endoscopic biopsy specimens (46.7 ± 16.2% and 37.0 ± 16.4%, respectively, P = 0.049) (Fig. 3B). With regard to the apoptosis of cancer cells, only sparse positive TUNEL staining was observed in endoscopic biopsy specimens and no significant alteration in TUNEL staining positivity was seen in surgically-resected specimens (data not shown).
Discussion
Regardless of the widespread clinical use of SEMS for MLBO, reliable data on its influence on long-term oncological outcomes is lacking and, therefore the issue is not yet resolved. It is believed that SEMS introduction for MLBO could induce perforation and mechanical manipulation of the tumour, which, in turn, can have a negative oncological impact, including peritoneal dissemination, tumour progression and metastasis. In contrast to SEMS-induced colonic perforation, with several studies demonstrating significantly worse survival through tumour spreading into the peritoneal cavity [16, 17], the oncological influence on cancer tissue of SEMS-induced mechanical manipulation has not been investigated thus far. Previously, a small number of studies assessed the pathological appearance of surgically-resected SEMS-inserted specimens, and revealed characteristics such as tumour indentation, fissuring ulceration and inflammatory changes mimicking inflammatory bowel diseases [19,20,21]. However, how these SEMS-induced pathological changes affect malignant tumour potential is unknown. In contrast, our study design comparing oncological molecular markers before and after SEMS insertion in each patient seems to be reasonable to assess the direct influence of SEMS on oncological characteristics. On reflection, while SEMS is applied to a variety of clinical settings including malignant biliary, oesophagus, gastric and duodenal obstructions, surgical resection after SEMS insertion (BTS) is clinically accepted only in MLBO. The use of human CRC samples would be the only and the best way to explore this question.
Ki-67 protein is present in the nuclei of cells during mitosis and is involved in the regulation of the cell cycle [24]. Its expression is used as a marker of cell proliferation, and it has been recognized as an independent prognostic marker in various cancers, including CRC [24,25,26,27,28]. Surprisingly, mechanical manipulation by SEMS resulted in a significant decrease in Ki-67 expression. The mechanical manipulation occurring in constrained environments, consistent with a tumour and the stroma, entails a competition for space. The pathways of communication between a tumour and its microenvironment are diverse, but they can be broadly separated into biochemical and mechanical signals. The biochemical signals have been widely studied in the past [29, 30], however, the mechanical signals are just beginning to be investigated. Recently, several in vitro studies have shown the effect of compressive stress applied on a tumour model system, called a multicellular spheroid (MCS). MCSs are three-dimensional cellular aggregates that remarkably mimic the relevant in vivo physiological gradients of mitogens, oxygen or glucose and have been extensively used as model system for the study of drug delivery, cell proliferation, invasion and angiogenesis [31]. Previous studies have revealed that a compressive stress applied on MCSs grown from a colon carcinoma cell line drastically reduce their proliferation rate and that this reduction is associated with a decrease in cell division rather than to an increase in cell apoptosis [32, 33]. Delarue et al. [34] reported in their consecutive in vitro studies that a compressive stress inhibited the proliferation of colon cancer cells, which were blocked in G1 phase of the cell cycle, through overexpression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27kip1. Reduced p27kip1 expression is prevalent in a wide range of human cancers including CRC, and its decreased expression is also correlated with more advanced disease stage and poorer oncological outcomes in various cancers [35, 36]. Thus, we investigated alterations of p27kip1 expression before and after SEMS insertion to explore the mechanism of reduction of Ki-67 expression. Resected specimens after SEMS insertion showed a significant upregulation of p27kip1 expression compared with biopsy specimens, as expected. Furthermore, apoptosis of cancer cells was not induced after SEMS insertion, as previously reported [32, 33].
EGFR is a transmembrane glycoprotein with an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain. Binding of ligands to the EGFR promotes tumour growth and progression by controlling transcription, cell cycle progression, apoptosis and differentiation through the downstream signal pathway [23]. Several studies demonstrated that EGFR overexpression, as assessed by IHC, is associated with poor prognosis in advanced CRC [37, 38]. However, a recent retrospective analysis of two large prospective studies indicated that EGFR IHC could not be predictive for the response to anti-EGFR antibody treatment in metastatic CRC [39]. The reported positivity of EGFR IHC using the US FDA-approved EGFR pharm Dx kit is 25–85% [37]. Thus, a finding of 52% of EGFR-positive endoscopic biopsy specimens in our study seemed to be acceptable. Although it did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.057), the categorical distribution before and after SEMS insertion showed a downward trend; 32% of patients had a decreased category and a total of 84% of patients did not show an increase in EGFR expression after SEMS insertion. Interestingly, it was reported that there is a close inverse relationship between p27kip1 and EGFR expression in human CRC specimens, and p27kip1 was found to negatively regulate EGFR expression via the JNK (c-Jun N-terminal kinase)/c-Jun transcription factor [40].
VEGF is a well-known major regulator of angiogenesis and plays an important role in tumour progression. Several studies observed that overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in CRC patients [22, 41]. The current study demonstrated no change or a decrease in expression category in 60% of the patients, but 40% showed an increase. It is conceivable that SEMS-induced mechanical compression of cancer tissue could exposure cancer cells to a hypoxic environment. Hypoxia is known to be a potent inducer of VEGF gene expression [42]. VEGF is transcriptionally regulated by hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), which translocates to the nucleus following hypoxia-induced stabilization, and activates hypoxia-inducible genes (HRE) in the promoter region of the VEGF genes. The hypoxia–HIF–VEGF pathway facilitates neovascularization and tumour progression [43]. Further comprehensive investigations are required to elucidate the SEMS-induced modification of this pathway.
This study has several limitations. First, statistical analyses of differences were limited by the small sample size from a single institution. Second, complete blindness of examined slides before or after SEMS insertion was impossible because of the morphological differences, but the study quality was secured by withholding the study hypothesis from the pathologist. Third, it is unclear as to what extent changes in the assessed molecular markers can affect the oncological outcomes.
Conclusions
The long-term safety of the BTS strategy for MLBO should be determined by a high-quality large-scale clinical trial (for example, the COBRA trial [44] ongoing in Japan). However, the results of this study demonstrated the possibility of CRC cell proliferation suppression resulting from mechanical compression induced by SEMS, and thus our findings could provide some insights into this unresolved issue.
References
Dauphine CE, Tan P, Beart RW Jr, Vukasin P, Cohen H, Corman ML (2002) Placement of self-expanding metal stents for acute malignant large-bowel obstruction: a collective review. Ann Surg Oncol 9:574–579
Deans GT, Krukowski ZH, Irwin ST (1994) Malignant obstruction of the left colon. Br J Surg 81:1270–1276
Yeo HL, Lee SW (2013) Colorectal emergencies: review and controversies in the management of large bowel obstruction. J Gastrointest Surg 17:2007–2012
Barillari P, Aurello P, De Angelis R, Valabrega S, Ramacciato G, D’Angelo F, Fegiz G (1992) Management and survival of patients affected with obstructive colorectal cancer. Int Surg 77:251–255
Tekkis PP, Kinsman R, Thompson MR, Stamatakis JD, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (2004) The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland study of large bowel obstruction caused by colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 240:76–81
Pearce NW, Scott SD, Karran SJ (1992) Timing and method of reversal of Hartmann’s procedure. Br J Surg 79:839–841
Dohmoto M (1991) New method: endoscopic implantation of rectal stent in palliative treatment of malignant stenosis. Endosc Dig 3:1507–1512
Saida Y, Enomoto T, Takabayashi K, Otsuji A, Nakamura Y, Nagao J, Kusachi S (2011) Outcome of 141 cases of self-expandable metallic stent placements for malignant and benign colorectal strictures in a single center. Surg Endosc 25:1748–1752
Saito S, Yoshida S, Isayama H, Matsuzawa T, Kuwai T, Maetani I, Shimada M, Yamada T, Tomita M, Koizumi K, Hirata N, Kanazawa H, Enomoto T, Sekido H, Saida Y (2016) A prospective multicenter study on self-expandable metallic stents as a bridge to surgery for malignant colorectal obstruction in Japan: efficacy and safety in 312 patients. Surg Endosc 30:3976–3986
Cirocchi R, Farinella E, Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Listorti C, Boselli C, Parisi A, Noya G, Sagar J (2013) Safety and efficacy of endoscopic colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery in the management of intestinal obstruction due to left colon and rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 22:14–21
Huang X, Lv B, Zhang S, Meng L (2014) Preoperative colonic stents versus emergency surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 18:584–591
Tan CJ, Dasari BV, Gardiner K (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of self-expanding metallic stents as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 99:469–476
Gorissen KJ, Tuynman JB, Fryer E, Wang L, Uberoi R, Jones OM, Cunningham C, Lindsey I (2013) Local recurrence after stenting for obstructing left-sided colonic cancer. Br J Surg 100:1805–1809
Matsuda A, Miyashita M, Matsumoto S, Matsutani T, Sakurazawa N, Takahashi G, Kishi T, Uchida E (2015) Comparison of long-term outcomes of colonic stent as “bridge to surgery” and emergency surgery for malignant large-bowel obstruction: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 22:497–504
Sabbagh C, Browet F, Diouf M, Cosse C, Brehant O, Bartoli E, Mauvais F, Chauffert B, Dupas J, Nguyen-Khac E, Regimbeau J (2013) Is stenting as “a bridge to surgery” an oncologically safe strategy for the management of acute, left-sided, malignant, colonic obstruction? A comparative study with a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg 258:107–115
Kim SJ, Kim HW, Park SB, Kang DH, Choi CW, Song BJ, Hong JB, Kim DJ, Park BS, Son GM (2015) Colonic perforation either during or after stent insertion as a bridge to surgery for malignant colorectal obstruction increases the risk of peritoneal seeding. Surg Endosc 29:3499–3506
Sloothaak DA, van den Berg MW, Dijkgraaf MG, Fockens P, Tanis PJ, van Hooft JE, Bemelman WA, Collaborative Dutch Stent-In Study Group (2014) Oncological outcome of malignant colonic obstruction in the Dutch Stent-In 2 trial. Br J Surg 101:1751–1757
Adler DG, Young-Fadok TM, Smyrk T, Garces YI, Baron TH (2002) Preoperative chemoradiation therapy after placement of a self-expanding metal stent in a patient with an obstructing rectal cancer: clinical and pathologic findings. Gastrointest Endosc 55:435–437
Amini N, Haydel D, Reisian N, Sempa G, Chu J, Wang Q, Zhao G, Stamos MJ, Wu ML (2012) Colorectal stents orient specimens and induce artifacts that mimic Crohn disease. Int J Surg Pathol 20:161–168
Fryer E, Gorissen KJ, Wang LM, Guy R, Chetty R (2015) Spectrum of histopathological changes encountered in stented colorectal carcinomas. Histopathology 66:480–484
Kusayanagi S, Kaneko K, Yamamura F, Hirakawa M, Miyasaka N, Konishi K, Kurahashi T, Yoshikawa N, Tsunoda A, Kusano M, Mitamura K (2002) Histological findings after placement of a self-expanding stent in rectal carcinoma with complete obstruction—case report. Hepatogastroenterology 49:412–415
Cao D, Hou M, Guan YS, Jiang M, Yang Y, Gou HF (2009) Expression of HIF-1alpha and VEGF in colorectal cancer: association with clinical outcomes and prognostic implications. BMC Cancer 9:432
Takahashi N, Yamada Y, Taniguchi H, Honma Y, Iwasa S, Kato K, Hamaguchi T, Shimada Y (2014) Combined assessment of epidermal [corrected] growth factor receptor dual color in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry with downstream gene mutations in prediction of response to the anti-EGFR therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Arch Med Res 45:366–374
Shin IY, Sung NY, Lee YS, Kwon TS, Si Y, Lee YS, Oh ST, Lee IK (2014) The expression of multiple proteins as prognostic factors in colorectal cancer: cathepsin D, p53, COX-2, epidermal growth factor receptor, C-erbB-2, and Ki-67. Gut Liver 8:13–23
Bubendorf L, Sauter G, Moch H, Schmid HP, Gasser TC, Jordan P, Mihatsch MJ (1996) Ki67 labelling index: an independent predictor of progression in prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy. J Pathol 178:437–441
Chen YT, Henk MJ, Carney KJ, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Zheng T, Feygin M, Madoff RD (1997) Prognostic significance of tumor markers in colorectal cancer patients: DNA index, S-phase fraction, p53 expression, and Ki-67 index. J Gastrointest Surg 1:266–272 (discussion 273)
Huh JW, Lee JH, Kim HR (2010) Expression of p16, p53, and Ki-67 in colorectal adenocarcinoma: a study of 356 surgically resected cases. Hepatogastroenterology 57:734–740
Jansen RL, Hupperets PS, Arends JW, Joosten-Achjanie SR, Volovics A, Schouten HC, Hillen HF (1998) MIB-1 labelling index is an independent prognostic marker in primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer 78:460–465
Mueller MM, Fusenig NE (2004) Friends or foes—bipolar effects of the tumour stroma in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 4:839–849
Roussos ET, Condeelis JS, Patsialou A (2011) Chemotaxis in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 11:573–587
Hirschhaeuser F, Menne H, Dittfeld C, West J, Mueller-Klieser W, Kunz-Schughart LA (2010) Multicellular tumor spheroids: an underestimated tool is catching up again. J Biotechnol 148:3–15
Delarue M, Montel F, Caen O, Elgeti J, Siaugue JM, Vignjevic D, Prost J, Joanny JF, Cappello G (2013) Mechanical control of cell flow in multicellular spheroids. Phys Rev Lett 110:138103
Montel F, Delarue M, Elgeti J, Malaquin L, Basan M, Risler T, Cabane B, Vignjevic D, Prost J, Cappello G, Joanny JF (2011) Stress clamp experiments on multicellular tumor spheroids. Phys Rev Lett 107:188102
Delarue M, Montel F, Vignjevic D, Prost J, Joanny JF, Cappello G (2014) Compressive stress inhibits proliferation in tumor spheroids through a volume limitation. Biophys J 107:1821–1828
Belletti B, Baldassarre G (2012) New light on p27(kip1) in breast cancer. Cell Cycle 11:3701–3702
Bottini C, Platini F, Rinaldi M, Leutner M, Alabiso O, Garavoglia M, Tessitore L (2009) p27Kip1 is inactivated in human colorectal cancer by cytoplasmic localization associated with activation of Akt/PKB. Int J Oncol 34:69–77
Galizia G, Lieto E, Ferraraccio F, De Vita F, Castellano P, Orditura M, Imperatore V, La Mura A, La Manna G, Pinto M, Catalano G, Pignatelli C, Ciardiello F (2006) Prognostic significance of epidermal growth factor receptor expression in colon cancer patients undergoing curative surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 13:823–835
Rego RL, Foster NR, Smyrk TC, Le M, O’Connell MJ, Sargent DJ, Windschitl H, Sinicrope FA (2010) Prognostic effect of activated EGFR expression in human colon carcinomas: comparison with EGFR status. Br J Cancer 102:165–172
Licitra L, Storkel S, Kerr KM, Van Cutsem E, Pirker R, Hirsch FR, Vermorken JB, von Heydebreck A, Esser R, Celik I, Ciardiello F (2013) Predictive value of epidermal growth factor receptor expression for first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab in patients with head and neck and colorectal cancer: analysis of data from the EXTREME and CRYSTAL studies. Eur J Cancer 49:1161–1168
Fang Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Meng Y, Zhu J, Jin H, Li J, Zhang D, Yu Y, Wu XR, Huang C (2014) A new tumour suppression mechanism by p27Kip1: EGFR down-regulation mediated by JNK/c-Jun pathway inhibition. Biochem J 463:383–392
Wu Y, Jin M, Xu H, Shimin Z, He S, Wang L, Zhang Y (2010) Clinicopathologic significance of HIF-1α, CXCR4, and VEGF expression in colon cancer. Clin Dev Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/537531
Kaur B, Khwaja FW, Severson EA, Matheny SL, Brat DJ, Van Meir EG (2005) Hypoxia and the hypoxia-inducible-factor pathway in glioma growth and angiogenesis. Neuro Oncol 7:134–153
Kondo Y, Arii S, Mori A, Furutani M, Chiba T, Imamura M (2000) Enhancement of angiogenesis, tumor growth, and metastasis by transfection of vascular endothelial growth factor into LoVo human colon cancer cell line. Clin Cancer Res 6:622–630
Japan Colonic Stent Safe Procedure Research Group (2017) Colonic stent for “bridge to surgery” prospective randomized controlled trial comparing treatment with non-stenting surgery in stage II/III obstructive colon cancer (COBRA Trial). https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000029703
Acknowledgements
We thank H. Nikki March, PhD, from Edanz Group (http://www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study concept and design: AM and SM. Acquisition of data: AM, NS, YK, KY, KS, MY, and TH. Analysis and interpretation of data: AM, and SM. Drafting of the manuscript: AM. Study supervision: MM, and HY.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Drs. Akihisa Matsuda, Masao Miyashita, Satoshi Matsumoto, Nobuyuki Sakurazawa, Youichi Kawano, Kazuya Yamahatsu, Kumiko Sekiguchi, Marina Yamada, Tsutomu Hatori, and Hiroshi Yoshida have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matsuda, A., Miyashita, M., Matsumoto, S. et al. Colonic stent-induced mechanical compression may suppress cancer cell proliferation in malignant large bowel obstruction. Surg Endosc 33, 1290–1297 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6411-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6411-x