Abstract
During metamorphosis, holometabolous insects undergo significant remodeling of their midgut and become able to cope with changes in dietary requirements between larval and adult stages. At this stage, insects must be able to manage and recycle available food resources in order to develop fully into adults, especially when no nutrients are acquired from the environment. Autophagy has been previously suggested to play a crucial role during metamorphosis of the mosquito. Here, we investigate the overall morphological changes of the midgut of the sand fly during metamorphosis and assess the expression profiles of the autophagy-related genes ATG1, ATG6, and ATG8, which are associated with various steps of the autophagic process. Morphological changes in the midgut start during the fourth larval instar, with epithelial degeneration followed by remodeling via the differentiation of regenerative cells in pre-pupal and pupal stages. The changes in the midgut epithelium are paired with the up-regulation of ATG1, ATG6 and ATG8 during the larva-adult transition. Vein, a putative epidermal growth factor involved in regulating epithelial midgut regeneration, is also up-regulated. Autophagy has further been confirmed in sand flies via the presence of autophagosomes residing within the cytoplasmic compartment of the pupal stages. An understanding of the underlying mechanisms of this process should aid the future management of this neglected tropical vector.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
During metamorphosis, insects must be able to manage and recycle existing tissues, organelles and nutrients to develop fully into adults, as they are unable to acquire further food from the environment. In addition, for holometabolous insects, midgut remodeling is crucial for the digestive system to cope with the distinct feeding habits that may vary significantly between the larva and adult. The midgut remodeling process is coordinated by the proliferation and differentiation of stem cells into differentiated midgut cells, including digestive and endocrine cells (Wigglesworth 1972; for a review, see Hakim et al. 2010), and this is intensified during the larva to pupa transition. Midgut transformation involves the replacement of most larval midgut cells by new differentiated cells. In this transition during the life cycle, larval epithelial cells degenerate and, at the same time, are replaced by the differentiation and reorganization of regenerative cells present in the larval midgut (Neves et al. 2003a, b; Martins et al. 2006).
Autophagy has been previously suggested to play a crucial role during the metamorphosis of holometabolous insects and has been shown to serve as the principal mode of programmed cell death for the remodeling of larval tissues in favor of adult variants (Berry and Baehrecke 2007; McPhee et al. 2013; Rusten et al. 2004; Tian et al. 2013; Denton et al. 2009, 2012; Franzetti et al. 2012). Details associated with midgut remodeling during metamorphosis have been characterized in some blood-sucking dipterans including the major mosquito vectors Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus (Nishiura et al. 2003; Okuda et al. 2007; Parthasarathy and Palli 2007; Ray et al. 2009; Fernandes et al. 2014, 2016). Recently, autophagy has been demonstrated to be under the direct influence of ecdysone signaling during development (Liu et al. 2015). Specifically, elements of the promoter for the autophagy-related gene ATG1 in the silk worm Bombix mori allow ATG1 to act as a primary response gene to the growth hormone and E93 transcription factor (Siegmund and Lehmann 2002). Moreover, the epidermal growth factor (EGF) Vein, which is associated with regulating epithelial midgut regeneration during infection in Drosophila melanogaster (Buchon et al. 2010), is also likely to be involved in the development of intestinal progenitor cells during the formation of the adult epithelium (Jiang and Edgar 2009; Biteau and Jasper 2011).
Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera:Psychodidade) are known for their major role in the transmission of leishmaniasis, a neglected tropical disease caused by parasites of the genus Leishmania. As a holometabolous insect, sand flies develop, after egg hatching, via four larval stages followed by the pupal stage and finally into the winged adult (for reviews, see Killick-Kendrick 1999; Rangel and Lainson 2003; Lainson and Rangel 2005). During the transition from the immature stages to the adult, sand flies change their feeding habits from being detritivorous to being phytophagous and/or hematophagous (Sherlock 2003). Only females are hematophagous and such a feeding habit renders the sand fly female of epidemiological relevance.
The digestive tract in the larvae of sand flies has a relatively smooth tubular shape along its length (do Vale et al. 2007; Heerman et al. 2015), whereas in the adult, the abdominal midgut is more dilated and able to expand after food intake, including blood (Andrade-Coêlho et al. 2001; Sádlová and Volf 2009; Malta et al. 2016). In spite of several studies focused on the morphology of the midgut in both adults and larvae in sand flies (Gemetchu 1974; Rudin and Hecker 1982; Andrade-Coêlho et al. 2001; Secundino et al. 2005; Malta et al. 2016), studies pertaining to midgut remodeling or epithelial regeneration during metamorphosis and to the regulation of genes associated with autophagy are either scarce or non-existent.
The midgut plays crucial physiological roles in sand flies, including food intake, digestion and nutrient absorption and for the establishment of pathogens. Despite these vital roles, the morphophysiological processes that lead to the final shape of the midgut in adults are poorly understood. Our aim in this study is to combine details of the morphological (gross and detailed) changes undergone by the sand fly midgut during metamorphosis with the expression of the autophagy-related genes ATG1, ATG6 and ATG8 and of the putative sand fly EGF gene Vein. Our results reveal new insights into the biology of two sand fly species, namely Lutzomyia longipalpis and Phlebotomus papatasi, major vectors of Leishmania infantum and Leishmania major, respectively, providing important details of the midgut remodeling process that occurs during metamorphosis in sand flies.
Materials and methods
Sand flies
The two sand fly species used in our studies, L. longipalpis Jacobina strain (LLJB) and P. papatasi Israeli strain (PPIS) were reared in the Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, USA. Larvae were maintained in “larval pots”, i.e., 250 or 500 ml plastic jars (Nalgene, Thermo Fisher Scientific) with an approximately 2-cm-thick bed made of dental plaster (Schein) and were fed on larval chow (a mixture of 50 % rabbit droppings and 50 % rabbit food). All larval stages and adult emergence were monitored daily. The various larval stages from larval stage 3 (L3) to pupae were separated according to stage and maintained in larval pots. Adults were routinely released into plexyglass rearing cages (15 × 15 × 15 cm or 25 × 25 × 25 cm).
We studied the following developmental stages of the sand fly: 3-day-old fourth instar larvae (or L4-3), the last stage of which still feeds and wanders and whose midgut is typically full of food and still contains the type II peritrophic matrix (PM2); 5-day-old fourth instar larvae (or L4-5), representing the last larval stage, which has stopped feeding and whose midgut is empty, with PM2 no longer being detectable; pre-pupae, during which the transition from the larval to pupal stages occurs; pupa 24 h (P24) and 72 h (P72), as representative time-points of early and late pupal stages; and newly emerged females, representing the adult stage. All recently emerged (RE) adult females used in the experiments below were less than 12 h old, as pupae were monitored until the night before emergence, and adults were released and collected for dissection the next morning. All adults were unfed (i.e., no water or sugar were offered).
Midgut morphology and ultrastructure during sand fly development
In the sand fly, the midgut and cell morphology during larval development and throughout metamorphosis was assessed by using the microscopic techniques outlined below.
Dissection
For histological analysis and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), five midguts of each developmental stage of L. longipalpis and P. papatasi were dissected in 0.1 M PBS (phosphate-buffered saline), fixed in 2.5 % glutaraldehyde solution (0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4) for at least 2 h, and kept at 4 °C in 0.1 M PBS until use. For immunofluorescence analysis, the midguts were dissected, fixed in Zamboni solution (2 % paraformaldehyde containing 15 % picric acid in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer) for 2 h and kept at 4 °C.
Histology
The fixed samples were washed in 0.1 M PBS, dehydrated in an ascending ethanol series (30-100 %), infiltrated in ethanol/historesin Leica (Biosystems Leica, Nussloch, Germany; 1:1) for 10 min, and embedded in historesin with hardener. Blocks were sectioned (3-μm-thick sections) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) or HE and toluidine blue (TB). Slides were mounted with Eukitt mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA), analyzed and photographed under an optical microscope Olympus BX 53 equipped with a digital camera (Olympus DP 73).
Transmission electron microscopy
Fixed samples (see Dissection) were post-fixed in 1 % osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer for 2 h, protected from light. They were then washed three times in PBS, dehydrated in an ascending ethanol series (30-100 %) and pre-infiltrated in LRWhite resin solution (London Resin Company, UK) and 100 % ethanol (2:1) for 1 h, followed by another pre-infiltration of the same mixture at a ratio of 1:1 for 2 h. Subsequently, the samples were kept in pure resin for 24 h at 4 °C, and polymerization was carried out at 60 °C for 24 h in gelatin capsules. Ultrathin sections were contrasted with uranyl acetate solution (2 %) and lead citrate (0.2 %) and analyzed in a Zeiss EM 109 transmission electron microscope.
RNA extraction, reverse transcription, and real-time polymerase chain reaction
For reverse transcription with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), whole-body RNA of L. longipalpis L3, wandering L4, pupae, or adult females was isolated by using TRIzol (Invitrogen-Thermo Fischer, Carlsbad, Calif., USA) and for each group of insects, RNA isolation was conducted in triplicate. RNA quality was assessed by electrophoresis on 1 % agarose-5 % formaldehyde in 1× MOPS gel prior to first-strand cDNA synthesis by using the Superscript III reverse transcription kit (Invitrogen-Thermo Fischer) as described (Coutinho-Abreu et al. 2010). mRNA levels for the various developmental stages were quantified with iQ SYBER Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif., USA) at 95 °C for 5 min followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 45 s in a Realplex4 Master cycler (Eppendorf, Hauppauge, N.Y., USA). Fold changes were measured via the ∆∆Ct method and calibration against the expression of each L3 transcript was used for comparison (Schmittgen and Livak 2008). Sequences for ATG1 (accession no. LLOJ007855), ATG6 (accession no. LLOJ007047), ATG8 (accession no. LLOJ007649) and Vein (accession no. LLOJ001534) were obtained from homology to D. melanogaster sequences and by using Blastn and/or Blastp against L. longipalpis sequences available in the VectorBase (https://www.vectorbase.org/blast). The results of these queries are summarized in Supplemental Table 1. Primer sequences were generated by using Primer3 (http://biotools.umassmed.edu/bioapps/primer3_www.cgi). Primers for Vein were based on the sequences used in our previous study (Heerman et al. 2015). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplicon sequence was assessed by direct sequencing (data not shown). All Blastp data and primer sequences used in this study are summarized in Supplemental Table 1 and Supplemental Table 2.
Immunofluorescence: markers of apoptosis, autophagy, and cell proliferation
Midguts (n = 3 per developmental stage) previously fixed in Zamboni fixative were washed three times in 0.1 M PBS/1 % Triton X-100 (PBST) and incubated separately with either anti-caspase-3 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo., USA; 1:1000), anti-nuclear protein phosphohistone H3 (PH3; 1:1000), or anti-LC3A/B (1:100; Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, Mass., USA) for 24 h at 4 °C in PBST. The LC3A/B antibody is the mammalian version of anti-ATG8. Samples were washed again, then incubated with secondary anti-rabbit antibody conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC; Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 24 h at 4 °C (1:500), washed three times in PBS (10 min each), mounted with Moiwol solution (whole-mount) and subsequently analyzed and photographed under a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 510; Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Thornwood, N.Y., USA). For PH3, samples were also analyzed under an epifluorescence microscope (Olympus BX60 equipped with a digital camera).
For labeling with rabbit anti-D. melanogaster ATG6 (Beclin1) polyclonal antibody, samples of sand fly midgut were washed four times for 30 min each with PBS containing 0.3 % Triton X-100 (PBST) and then blocked with PBS containing 1 % bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 30 min at room temperature. Antibodies were diluted 1:500 in PBST immediately prior to use. Following primary antibody incubation overnight at 4 °C, samples were washed as indicated above and incubated overnight at 4 °C with Alexa-Fluor-594-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (Invitrogen-Thermo Fischer) diluted 1:1000 in PBST. After another round of washes (as above), the nuclei were stained for 5 minutes with 10 μg/ml 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Invitrogen-Thermo Fischer). The specificity of fluorescence signals was evaluated in negative controls treated only with the second FITC-conjugated antibody (without the primary antibodies). Negative controls were mounted and analyzed as described above (see below).
Midgut morphometry
The height of the digestive cells was measured in digital micrographs of the histological sections. Five cells were measured in each individual (n = 5) of each stage/phase of development, and only cells with a striated border and apparent basal lamina were considered. The measurements were performed with the aid of the software Image-ProPlus Windows version 4.2 (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, Md., USA). The data were submitted to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test (P < 0.001) to test the differences between the stages of the same species and to Student’s t-test to detect differences between the same developmental stage among species (P < 0.001).
In addition to the measurements of midgut cells, we also determined the general dimensions of whole guts from L. longipalpis. Larval gut that had been previously imaged by using anti-ATG6 antibodies (see Immunofluorescence: markers of apoptosis, autophagy, and cell proliferation) was re-analyzed for length and width by using the Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy) and axial ratios (L/W) were calculated. The guts of five animals each from the three developmental stages, namely L3, wandering L4 and pupae, and of five adult females were placed into PBS and fixed for 20 min at room temperature with 4 % paraformaldehyde in PBS. Samples were mounted in FluorSave anti-photo-bleaching reagent (CalBiochem-EMD Millipore, Billerica, Mass., USA) and images were obtained via a Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy). In addition, images were manipulated and midgut length, width and axial ratios were measured by using the Zen confocal microscope software (Zeiss).
Sequence alignments, phylogeny and putative ecdysone-response element prediction
To determine putative ecdysone-response element regions upstream of ATG1, genomic sequence (AJWK01026160.1) was obtained from the European Nucleotide Archive (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ENA/). This sequence was searched for the presence of canonical and non-canonical ecdysone-responsive sequence elements as described previously (Cherbas et al. 1991).
Results
Changes in midgut morphology and ultrastructure during sand fly development
Three-day-old L4 (L4-3)
The midgut epithelium of L4-3 displayed similar morphologies in both L. longipalpis (LLJB) and P. papatasi (PPIS), with a single layer of columnar basal cells on top of a basal lamina and coated externally by a muscle layer (Fig. 1a, b). Digestive cells and stem cells were the principal cell types observed. The digestive cells had a brush border and a nucleus with predominantly decondensed chromatin and an evident nucleolus (Fig. 1a). Stem cells were small, were located at the basal region of the digestive cells, and were present either isolated as single cells or in small clusters (Fig. 1b). The midgut lumen was filled by the food bolus surrounded by PM2 (Fig. 1a, b, Supplementary Fig. 1a). The average height of the columnar cells was measured at 49.0 ± 2.1 μm in LLJB and 54.5 ± 3.9 μm in PPIS (P > 0.001) and was statistically different from heights at other stages (P < 0.001; Supplementary Fig. 2a).
Microvilli were developed and well organized in parallel, and numerous mitochondria were seen at the apex of the digestive cells. The median region of the cytoplasm of the cells contained vacuoles, especially in PPIS (Fig. 1d, e). Adjacent cells were joined by septate junctions, present primarily in the apical portion (Fig. 1d, f). In the basal region of these cells, the plasma membrane had invaginations, forming a basal labyrinth associated with mitochondria (Fig. 1g). In addition to the basal lamina, internal and external muscle bundles surrounded the midgut epithelium (Fig. 1c).
Stem cells were present throughout the midgut of the two sand fly species and, as indicated previously, were visible either as single cells or forming small clusters with as many as three cells on the basal region of the epithelium. These cells had little cytoplasm and a central nucleus. The stem cells were poor in organelles, possessing few mitochondria and rough endoplasmic reticulum (rer). The nucleus of the stem cells was predominantly composed of decondensed chromatin, and their plasma membrane displayed few invaginations (Figs. 1b, g, Supplementary Fig. 1b).
In PPIS, “bubble-like” protrusions or blebs were observed on the apical portion of epithelial cells (Fig. 1d, Supplementary Fig. 1a) and were suggestive of the apocrine secretion that follows the rupture of blebs and the release of the apical cytoplasm and organelles into the lumen. Our results suggest that the degeneration of the epithelium during the larval development in PPIS starts at this stage (L4-3), with the degeneration of the digestive cells. In contrast, in LLJB, such morphological features were absent at this stage and unlike LLJB, the cytoplasm of degenerating digestive cells in PPIS was highly vacuolated (Fig. 1d–f) and remnants of digestive cells could also be observed (Fig. 1e).
Five-day-old L4 (L4-5)
During this stage, the morphology of the midgut epithelium was similar in both LLJB and PPIS, with columnar cells being slightly shorter than those observed in L4-3 (Fig. 2a and c). The assessed height of the digestive cells in L4-5 larvae was shorter than the height observed for the same cells in L4-3 larvae (P < 0.001) in both LLJB (assessed cell height of 27.9 ± 1.36 μm) and PPIS (assessed height of 34.0 ± 2.24 μm; Supplementary Fig. 2a). Unlike L4-3, the PM was not visible during the L4-5 stage (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Fig. 3a) and the degenerative process of the midgut cells was underway in the two sand fly species investigated. Here, the degenerative process was marked by the presence of cytoplasmic vacuoles within the digestive cells in both flies (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Fig. 3b) and by cytoplasmic protrusions or blebs (not shown) similar to those present in the L4-3 stage in PPIS.
Pre-pupa
In pre-pupa, the degeneration process continued with the release of portions of the cytoplasm of the larval midgut epithelium, simultaneously with the growth of the new epithelium (Fig. 2d-g). In LLJB, individualized stem cells were observed on the basal portion of the epithelium, whereas the cells undergoing differentiation (presumably digestive cells) formed a single layer (Supplementary Fig. 3c). In contrast, the PPIS midgut lumen was completely filled, probably by the remnants of the epithelium of the larva, ejected during the process of larval epithelium degeneration (Fig. 2c). The average assessed height of the differentiating cells in pre-pupae was even smaller than in the larvae of LLJB (18.3 ± 0.8 μm) and PPIS (16.8 ± 0.62 μm; P < 0.001; Supplementary Fig. 2a).
As yet undetermined cells in an intermediate stage of differentiation grew toward the midgut lumen, forming a new epithelium with nuclei at various positions. These cells had short microvilli and nuclei with decondensed chromatin and an evident nucleolus (Fig. 2d, e). Stem cells were also seen in groups in PPIS; they had cytoplasm with few organelles and a central nucleus occupying almost all the cytoplasm. Multilamelar bodies and cytoplasmic vacuoles were present within the differentiating cells. Several of these vacuoles corresponded to autophagic vacuoles with organelle remains or debris lying inside them (Fig. 2f, g).
Pupa at 24 h (P24)
The general characteristics of the midgut epithelium in P24 were similar for the two species. The growing adult epithelium had short cells (Fig. 3a-c, e), with an average height of 11.3 ± 0.5 μm in LLJB and 13.7 ± 0.92 μm PPIS (P < 0.001; Supplementary Fig. 2a).
In both species, the lumen was filled with homogeneous and electron-dense material, probably resulting from the histolysis of the larval epithelium (Fig. 3a-c, e). In differentiating cells in LLJB, mitochondria were seen mainly in the apical region or just above the nucleus, and short microvilli that were sometimes folded were also observed (Figs. 3d,d 4b). The rer was well developed (Fig. 3f) and multilamellar bodies were present in the cytoplasm of differentiating cells (Fig. 3g).
Pupa at 72 h (P72)
The morphology of the midgut epithelium at this stage was similar to that observed in P24, with short cells having an average height of 14.4 ± 0.75 μm in LLJB and 17.4 ± 0.7 μm in PPIS (P < 0.001; Supplementary Fig. 2a). Folds in the epithelium appeared in both species as the newly formed epithelium increased in size (Figs. 4a, Supplementary Fig. 3d). Similar to the previous stage, the lumen of the midgut was filled by electron-dense material (Fig. 4b, c). Stem cells were found at the base of the epithelium (Fig. 4d). As noted above for P24, differentiating cells in P72 also grew toward the lumen and mitochondria were also present in the apical region (Fig. 4b).
RE adults
The epithelium of the midgut in RE adults was similar in both species. It consisted in tall cells with an assessed height of 30.1 ± 1.09 μm in LLJB and 26.36 ± 0.69 μm in PPIS (P < 0.001; Supplementary Fig. 2a). The apical region of the digestive cells of both species showed short microvilli arranged in parallel. The epithelial cells had a nucleus in the center of the cell with predominantly decondensed chromatin and an evident nucleolus (Fig. 4e, f, Supplementary Fig. 3e, f). The digestive cells also displayed invaginations of the plasma membrane, forming a discrete basal labyrinth in the basal region (not shown). The cytoplasm of these cells contained few organelles, including mitochondria and an undeveloped rer. Adjacent digestive cells were joined by smooth septate junctions (Fig. 4e). The material in the lumen from the degeneration of the remaining larval epithelium was almost absent, and no stem cells were seen at this stage (Fig. 4f).
In addition to the specific cellular changes outlined above, we were also interested in measuring the overall midgut dimensions and axial ratios (L/W) in all four major developmental stages (L3, L4, pupa and adult) as a means to identify developmental timing. Using confocal microscopy, we determined no significant difference in midgut length between L3, pupa and adult sand flies (Supplementary Fig. 2b). However, the L4 gut was significantly longer (roughly 200 μm) than the average midgut length in the pupa and in the adult sand fly. In addition to length, the average width of the L4 midgut was roughly 100 μm wider than any other stage observed (Supplementary Fig. 2c). This correlated with a significantly lower value for the axial ratio observed in L4 in comparison with pupae (Supplementary Fig. 2d). These observations provided us with a guide to the specific midgut morphologies as the insect approached, proceeded through and exited metamorphosis.
Expression profiles of ATG1, ATG6, ATG8 and Vein during LLJB development
Using RT-qPCR, we measured the transcript levels for the genes for the early autophagosome kinase (ATG1) and for the beclin-domain-containing protein (ATG6), for the sequestration gene (ATG8) and for the levels of the putative EGF Vein. We compared third instar (L3) larvae, wandering L4, newly formed pupae and adult flies by RT-qPCR. For ATG1, we observed an approximately 10-fold increase in transcript levels for tested pupae compared with all other developmental stages. A non-significant increase was observed for ATG6 in L4 larva, coupled with a significant >200-fold increase for the transcript for pupae compared with other stages (Fig. 5a). Peak increase for ATG8 expression occurred at L4 and pupae vs. other stages. In the case of Vein, a 30-fold increase was observed for both L4 and pupa in comparison with L3 and adult (P < 0.05; Fig. 5b).
Markers for cell proliferation (mitosis), autophagy and apoptosis during sand fly development
A few cells positive for PH3 were observed in the midgut of the two sand fly species investigated. PH3-positive signals were clearly detected in larval stage L4-5 and in pupal stages P24 and P72 in both types of fly (Fig. 6). Although our analyses provided no quantitative data on the number of positive cells for PH3, a variation in the number of positive markers was detected between the developmental stages.
We also assessed the presence of pro-autophagic organelles and the expression of pro-apoptotic proteins in the midgut cells of sand fly during larval development, pupation and metamorphosis. To confirm the presence of autophagic vacuoles (autophagosomes) in the midgut of sand flies, we used the anti-LC3A/B (ATG8) antibody. Positivity for anti-LC3A/B was observed in pre-pupa, P24 and P72 in LLJB and in P24 and P72 in PPIS (Fig. 7). Immunofluorescence assays with the anti-caspase-3 antibody revealed that caspase activity was present in the pre-pupa and P72 stages of LLJB, whereas caspase-3 detection was observed in pre-pupa, P24 and P72 in PPIS (Fig. 7). A summary of the results obtained following immunofluorescense assays to determine the presence or absence of apoptosis and/or autophagy as a mechanism involved in the development and pupation in sand flies is shown in Table 1.
We further probed the sand fly midgut using polyclonal antibodies targeting ATG6. The anterior midgut region of pupae showed staining for ATG6 in the cytoplasm of epithelial cells (Fig. 8a) where autophagosomes were expected to be present (Fig. 8b). For the remaining stages investigated, namely L3, L4 and adult, the ATG6 antibody revealed little to no signal in the anterior midgut (Fig. 8b-e).
Linking ecdysone with autophagy
We previously mentioned that growing evidence supports the idea that ecdysone hormone action is directly linked to autophagy through the promoter of response genes, specifically ATG1. At least for LLJB, we identified a putative promoter for ATG1. Three putative ecdysone responsive element half-sites that have been described by Cherbas et al. (1991) and that may react to ecdysone signaling (Fig. 9) were also identified in the ATG1 sequence of LLJB (LlATG1). Additionally, the LlATG1 promoter containing the GAGA motif required for primary response protein binding as described in B. mori (Liu et al. 2015) was also observed (Fig. 9). Taken together, these results suggest the presence of a binding site for ecdysone in ATG1 not only in Lepidoptera, as previously reported (Liu et al. 2015) but also in Diptera. Nevertheless, a conclusive role for ecdysone in the activation of autophagy during metamorphosis in insects in general remains to be established.
Discussion
During metamorphosis, the midgut epithelium undergoes a complete renovation of its differentiated cells allowing the insect to adapt to a new feeding regimen during adulthood. Such cellular renovation of the midgut is crucial as the feeding habits of an insect can change drastically from the larval to the adult stage in holometabolous species. Epithelial remodeling during metamorphosis consists in two major events, namely the degeneration of differentiated cells of the larval epithelium and the proliferation and/or differentiation of stem cells in order to form the new adult midgut epithelium (Parthasarathy and Palli 2007). Previous studies have focused on the remodeling process of the midgut of various holometabolous insects (Neves et al. 2003a, b; Martins et al. 2006; Tettamanti et al. 2007; Franzetti et al. 2012) including some blood-sucking Dipterans (Nishiura et al. 2002; Wu et al. 2006; Parthasarathy and Palli 2007; Ray et al. 2009; Fernandes et al. 2014; 2016). However, little is known of such processes in phlebotomine sand flies whose role as vectors of Leishmania have been widely studied.
Several aspects of sand fly physiology resemble that of mosquitoes, including the fact that only females feed on blood. However, sand flies are unique with regards to their ability to transmit Leishmania and, interestingly, the Leishmania life cycle within the sand fly vector is mostly restricted to the vector midgut, with a crucial developmental step that requires parasite attachment to the gut epithelia (Kamhawi et al. 2004; Ramalho-Ortigão et al. 2010). Here, we investigated the morphological changes in the sand fly midgut during its development from the late larval stage to young adults (females). We also assessed the expression of the autophagy-related genes ATG1, ATG6 and ATG8 and investigated the expression profiles of Vein, a putative EGF. Two sand fly species have been studied in our investigations: L. longipalpis, a vector of Leishmania infantum and P. papatasi, a vector of Leishmania major.
The midgut remodeling process during the metamorphosis in mosquitoes includes the programmed cell death of the larval differentiated epithelial cells simultaneously with stem cell proliferation and differentiation to form the adult midgut epithelium (Nishiura et al. 2003; Ray et al. 2009). In sand flies, the pattern of alterations observed in the epithelial cells during midgut metamorphosis shares several features with other holometabolous species (Tettamanti et al. 2007; Franzetti et al. 2012; Romanelli et al. 2016) and specifically with regards to cell regeneration, PH3-positive cells have been reported in mosquitoes (Fernandes et al. 2014).
In lepidopterans, autophagy is activated at the beginning of metamorphosis (Franzetti et al. 2012; Romanelli et al. 2016). Similarly, the degeneration of the larval epithelium in sand flies begins during the fourth instar, with the elimination of differentiated cells and is completed in the pupal stage. During the pre-pupal stage, just after the larval molt, the histolysis of the digestive epithelium becomes more evident by an increase in the number of autophagic vacuoles (some with cellular debris) in the cytoplasm of cells and by the detachment and disposal of these cells toward the midgut lumen, giving space for the expansion of the differentiating cells. In both LLJB and PPIS, the process occurs in a similar manner from the pre-pupa and is well synchronized for both species as they enter the pupal stage. During the pre-pupal stage, the main difference between the species involves the luminal contents, which are missing in LLJB, since the elimination of the larval cells starts later in LLJB.
The morphology of midgut epithelial cells dramatically changes during the metamorphosis of insects (Nishiura and Smouse 2000; Neves et al. 2003a, b; Fernandes et al. 2014). In LLJB and PPIS during metamorphosis, the height of the midgut cells decreases. In pre-pupae, because of the coexistence of old larval digestive cells and cells early in the differentiation process, a disorganized epithelium is seen. A shorter cell height in P24 is possibly attributable to the prevalence of many small cells undergoing differentiation. In the RE adults, newly differentiated cells are tall and elongated, with re-established microvilli, and the mean height of the midgut epithelium is greater than that seen in the pupae, probably because of the elimination of the luminal contents, which permits cell expansion toward the midgut lumen.
Cells under differentiation were seen in the pre-pupal and pupal stages of both sand flies. The morphological characteristics of cells in differentiation seen here have also been reported during midgut metamorphosis in other insects (Neves et al. 2003a, b; Rost-Roszkowska et al. 2010; Fernandes et al. 2014). During differentiation, the regenerative cells lengthen toward the lumen, the nucleus becomes more prominent, and organelles become more conspicuous. The accumulation of mitochondria in the apical supranuclear region of cells is an important signal of cell differentiation and may help the cell to reach the lumen of the midgut (Rost-Roszkowska et al. 2010). As the cell differentiation process advances, short and folded microvilli are seen at the apex of these cells.
Whereas many midgut cells are still undergoing differentiation, undifferentiated stem cells form a group based on the epithelium of P72 LLJB. These stem cells remain undifferentiated in the pupa and will be presumably responsible for originating other nests of stem cells during pupation (Neves et al. 2003a, b). Stem cells are present in the midgut of insects not only during post-embryonic development. In adult Culex quinquefasciatus, for example, the replacement and/or renewal of midgut epithelial cells after feeding on blood takes place by the differentiation of pre-existing stem cells (Okuda et al. 2007).
Cell proliferation and cell death have been shown to be critical in defining the overall size of the insect midgut, as the balance between cell degeneration and regeneration establish the number of cells during midgut development (Sonakowska et al. 2016). The presence of PH3-positive (i.e., mitotic) cells in the midgut of both LLJB and PPIS suggests that, even during metamorphosis when the sand fly midgut undergoes significant changes, stem cell division still takes place and might contribute to midgut growth. The proliferation of stem cells has been reported in mosquitoes as being important to the process of the renewal of the midgut epithelium during metamorphosis (Nishiura and Smouse 2000; Nishiura et al. 2005; Fernandes et al. 2014). Further, as described for A. aegypti (Nishiura et al. 2003; Fernandes et al. 2014), the proliferation of stem cells in sand flies begins shortly after the last larval molt (L3-L4) and continues in the pupa.
Apoptosis and autophagy have been reported to occur simultaneously during metamorphosis in the midgut epithelium in D. melanogaster, with morphological features of autophagic cell death and components of apoptosis (Lee et al. 2002). However, the remodeling of fruit fly midgut is controversial. According to Denton et al. (2009), autophagy and not apoptosis, is critical to the process of cell death in the gut of D. melanogaster during metamorphosis. In this case, the pathway of apoptotic caspase activation is not required for the cell death process in the midgut during metamorphosis in this insect.
The death of the epithelial cells during the metamorphosis of the midgut of A. aegypti has been described as a process of programmed cell death dependent on caspases (Parthasarathy and Palli 2007). The presence of autophagic vacuoles in the epithelial cells in LLJB and PPIS, especially in the larval-pupal transition, combined with our analysis of the profiles of expression of ATG1, ATG6 and ATG8, strongly suggests that, in sand flies, the degenerative process of the digestive epithelium occurs by autophagy, leading to the death of larval digestive cells. Additionally, the presence of positive markers for ATG6, LC-3/ATG8 and caspase-3 in the pre-pupal and/or pupal stage in sand flies suggests that processes of both autophagy and apoptosis occur during the degeneration of the epithelium in the larval-pupal transition. This is similar to the situation in B. mori, in which autophagy starts in the fifth instar larvae and amplifies within pre-pupae, whereas apoptosis occurs from the pre-pupal stage (Franzetti et al. 2012). Moreover, the presence of the LC3 form of ATG8 implies the lipidation (phosphotidylethanolamine) of the protein suggestive of mature autophagosomes preparing to fuse with lysosomes (Nath et al. 2014). In this case, apoptosis participates in the elimination of the larval differentiated midgut cells, whereas autophagy assists in the recycling of nutrients during pupation when the insect does not feed. Thus, we can reasonably propose that the histolysis of the larval digestive cells in sand flies occurs by autophagy and cell death, as is the case in other holometablous insects such as A. aegypti and B. mori (Fernandes et al. 2014; Romanelli et al. 2016). In addition, we observed anti-ATG6 staining in the epithelial cells of the pupa, consistent with its role in the removal of the larval gut or as a pro-apoptotic response (Franzetti et al. 2012).
We also detected an up-regulation of the putative EGF Vein in L4 and pupa. We previously described the likely role of Vein following the infection of L. longipalpis larvae with Bacillus subtilis and Pantoea agglomerans (Heerman et al. 2015). Vein probably provides the signals necessary for the development of adult sand fly tissues within the puparium, as suggested from studies in Drosophila (Jiang and Edgar 2009; Biteau and Jasper 2011). Although the upregulation of Vein in both L4 and pupae may be associated with the beginning of adult tissue formation in the sand fly pupa, we have yet to determine whether it is localized to midgut stem cells.
An understanding of the link between ecdysone signaling and autophagy during insect metamorphosis is of physiological relevance. Whereas a recent biochemical study (Liu et al. 2015) shed light on this mechanism within Lepidoptera, nothing is known about this phenomenon within Diptera. In LLJB, we found genomic evidence to suggest that this phenomenon exists across multiple orders of holometabolous insects. Although we described the presence of a canonical ecdysone responsive element (Cherbas et al. 1991) in the promoter of ATG1 in LLJB, we have yet to identify a similar sequence in the genome of PPIS; issues related to the current PPIS genome scaffolding prevented us from doing so at this point. Furthermore, we were unable to identify binding sites for E93 in sand flies, as previously described for B. mori (Liu et al. 2015). The determination of the way that ATG1 promoters in sand flies and potentially other hematophagous Dipterans, are associated with the control of the onset of metamorphosis in these insects should provide crucial details about their development and possibly offer novel methods for their control.
References
Andrade-Coêlho CA, Santos-Mallet J, Souza NA, Lins U, Meirelles MN, Rangel EF (2001) Ultrastructural features of the midgut epithelium of females Lutzomyia intermedia (Lutz & Neiva, 1912) (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 96:1141–1151
Berry DL, Baehrecke EH (2007) Growth arrest and autophagy are required for salivary gland cell degradation in Drosophila. Cell 131:1137–1148
Biteau B, Jasper H (2011) EGF signaling regulates the proliferation of intestinal stem cells in Drosophila. Development 138:1045–1055
Buchon N, Broderick NA, Kuraishi T, Lemaitre B (2010) Drosophila EGFR pathway coordinates stem cell proliferation and gut remodeling following infection. BMC Biol 8:152
Cherbas L, Lee K, Cherbas P (1991) Identification of ecdysone response elements by analysis of the Drosophila Eip28/29 gene. Genes Dev 5:120–131
Coutinho-Abreu IV, Sharma NK, Robles-Murguia M, Ramalho-Ortigão M (2010) Targeting the midgut secreted PpChit1 reduces Leishmania major development in its natural vector, the sand fly Phlebotomus papatasi. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4:e901
Denton D, Shravage B, Simin R, Mills K, Berry DL, Baehrecke EH, Kumar S (2009) Autophagy, not apoptosis, is essential for midgut cell death in Drosophila. Curr Biol 19:1741174–6
Denton D, Chang TK, Nicolson S, Shravage B, Simin R, Baehrecke EH, Kumar S (2012) Relationship between growth arrest and autophagy in midgut programmed cell death in Drosophila. Cell Death Differ 19:1299–1307
Fernandes KM, Neves CA, Serrão JE, Martins GF (2014) Aedes aegypti midgut remodeling during metamorphosis. Parasitol Int 63:506–512
Fernandes KM, Magalhães-Júnior MJ, Baracat-Pereira MC, Martins GF (2016) Proteomic analysis of Aedes aegypti midgut during post-embryonic development and of the female mosquitoes fed different diets. Parasitol Int 65:668–676
Franzetti E, Huang ZJ, Shi YX, Xie K, Deng XJ, Li JP, Li QR, Yang W, Zeng W, Casartelli M, Deng H, Cappellozza S, Grimaldi A, Xia Q, Tettamanti G, Cao Y, Feng Q (2012) Autophagy precedes apoptosis during the remodeling of silkworm larval midgut. Apoptosis 17:305–324
Gemetchu T (1974) The morphology and fine structure of the midgut and peritrophic membrane of the adult female, Phlebotomus longipes Parrot and Martin (Diptera: Psychodidae). Ann Trop Med Parasitol 68:111–128
Hakim RS, Baldwin K, Smagghe G (2010) Regulation of midgut growth, development, and metamorphosis. Annu Rev Entomol 55:593–608
Heerman M, Weng JL, Hurwitz I, Durvasula R, Ramalho-Ortigão M (2015) Bacterial infection and immune responses in Lutzomyia longipalpis sand fly larvae midgut. PLoS Neg Trop Dis 9:e0003923
Jiang H, Edgar BA (2009) EGFR signaling regulates the proliferation of Drosophila adult midgut progenitors. Development 136:483–493
Kamhawi S, Ramalho-Ortigao M, Pham VM, Kumar S, Lawyer PG, Turco SJ, Barillas-Mury C, Sacks DL, Valenzuela JG, Valenzuela JG (2004) A role for insect galectins in parasite survival. Cell 119:329–341
Killick-Kendrick R (1999) The biology and control of phlebotomine sandflies. Clin Dermatol 17:279–289
Lainson R, Rangel EF (2005) Lutzomyia longipalpis and the eco-epidemiology of American visceral leishmaniasis, with particular reference to Brazil: a review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 100:811–827
Lee CY, Cooksey BA, Baehrecke EH (2002) Steroid regulation of midgut cell death during Drosophila development. Dev Biol 250:101–111
Liu X, Dai F, Guo E, Li K, Ma L, Tian L, Cao Y, Zhang G, Palli SR, Li S (2015) 20-Hydroxyecdysone (20E) primary response gene E93 modulates 20E signaling to promote Bombyx larval-pupal metamorphosis. J Biol Chem 290:27370–27383
Malta J, Martins GF, Weng JL, Fernandes KM, Munford ML, Ramalho-Ortigão M (2016) Effects of specific antisera targeting peritrophic matrix-associated proteins in the sand fly vector Phlebotomus papatasi. Acta Trop 159:161–169
Martins GF, Neves CA, Campos LAO, Serrão JE (2006) The regenerative cells during the metamorphosis in the midgut of bees. Micron 37:161–168
McPhee CK, Balgley BM, Nelson C, Hill JH, Batlevi Y, Fang X, Baehrecke EH (2013) Identification of factors that function in Drosophila salivary gland cell death during development using proteomics. Cell Death Differ 20:218–225
Nath S, Dancourt J, Shteyn V, Puente G, Fong MW, Nag S, Bewersdorf J, Yamamoto A, Antonny B, Melia JT (2014) Lipidation of the LC3/GABARAP family of autophagy proteins relies upon a membrane curvature-sensing domain in Atg3. Nat Cell Biol 16:415–424
Neves CA, Gitirana LB, Serrão JE (2003a) Ultrastructural study of the metamorphosis in the midgut of Melipona quadrifasciata anthidioides (Apidae, Meliponini) worker. Sociobiology 41:443–459
Neves CA, Gitirana LB, Serrão JE (2003b) Ultrastructure of the midgut endocrine cells in Melipona quadrifasciata anthidioides (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Braz J Biol 63:683–690
Nishiura JT, Smouse D (2000) Nuclear and cytoplasmic changes in the Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) alimentary canal during metamorphosis and their relationship to programmed cell death. Ann Entomol Soc Am 93:282–290
Nishiura JT, Ho P, Ray K (2003) Methoprene interferes with mosquito midgut remodeling during metamorphosis. J Med Entomol 40:498–507
Nishiura JT, Ray K, Murray J (2005) Expression of nuclear receptor-transcription factor genes during Aedes aegypti midgut metamorphosis and the effect of methoprene on expression. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 35:561–573
Okuda K, Almeida F de, Mortara RA, Krieger H, Marinotti O, Bijovsky AT (2007) Cell death and regeneration in the midgut of the mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus. J Insect Physiol 53:1307–1315
Parthasarathy R, Palli SR (2007) Stage- and cell-specific expression of ecdysone receptors and ecdysone-induced transcription factors during midgut remodeling in the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. J Insect Physiol 53:216–229
Ramalho-Ortigão M, Saraiva EM, Traub-Csekö YM (2010) Sand fly-Leishmania interactions: long relationships are not necessarily easy. Open Parasitol J 1:195–204
Rangel EF, Lainson R (2003) Ecologia das leishmanioses. In: Rangel EF, Lainson R (eds) Flebotomíneos do Brasil. FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, pp 291–311
Ray K, Mercedes M, Chan D, Choi CY, Nishiura JT (2009) Growth and differentiation of the larval mosquito midgut. J Insect Sci 9:1–13
Romanelli D, Casartelli M, Cappellozza S, Eguileor M de, Tettamanti G (2016) Roles and regulation of autophagy and apoptosis in the remodeling of the lepidopteran midgut epithelium during metamorphosis. Sci Rep 6:32939
Rost-Roszkowska MM, Vilimova J, Chajec L (2010) Fine structure of the midgut epithelium in Atelura formicaria (Hexapoda, Zygentoma, Ateluridae), with special reference to its regeneration and degeneration. Zool Stud 49:10–18
Rudin W, Hecker H (1982) Functional morphology of the midgut of a sandfly as compared to other hematophagous nematocera. Tissue Cell 14:751–758
Rusten TE, Lindmo K, Juhasz G, Sass M, Seglen PO, Brech A, Stenmark H (2004) Programmed autophagy in the Drosophila fat body is induced by ecdysone through regulation of the PI3K pathway. Dev Cell 7:179–192
Sádlová J, Volf P (2009) Peritrophic matrix of Phlebotomus duboscqi and its kinetics during Leishmania major development. Cell Tissue Res 337:313–325
Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ (2008) Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat Protocols 3:1101–1108
Secundino NFC, Eger-Mangrich I, Braga EM, Santoro MM, Pimenta PFP (2005) Lutzomyia longipalpis peritrophic matrix: formation, structure, and chemical composition. J Med Entomol 42:928–938
Sherlock ÍA (2003) A importância dos flebotomíneos. In: Rangel EF, Lainson R (eds) Flebotomíneos do Brasil. FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, pp 337–351
Siegmund T, Lehmann M (2002)The Drosophila Pipsqueak protein defines a new family of helix-turn-helix DNA-binding proteins.Dev Genes Evol 212:152–157
Sonakowska L, Włodarczyk A, Wilczek G, Wilczek P, Student S, Rost-Roszkowska M (2016) Cell death in the epithelia of the intestine and hepatopancreas in Neocaridina heteropoda (Crustacea, Malacostraca). PLoS ONE 11:e0147582
Tettamanti G, Grimaldi A, Casartelli M, Ambrosetti E, Ponti B, Congiu T, Ferrarese R, Rivas-Pena ML, Pennacchio F, Eguileor M de (2007) Programmed cell death and stem cell differentiation are responsible for midgut replacement in Heliothis virescens during pre-pupal instar. Cell Tissue Res 330:345–359
Tian L, Ma L, Guo E, Deng X, Ma S, Xia Q, Cao Y, Li S (2013) 20-Hydroxyecdysone upregulates Atg genes to induce autophagy in the Bombyx fat body. Autophagy 9:1172–1187
Vale VF do, Pereira MH, Gontijo NF (2007) Midgut pH profile and protein digestion in the larvae of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae). J Insect Physiol 53:1151–1159
Wigglesworth VB (1972) The principles of insect physiology. Chapman and Hall, London
Wu Y, Parthasarathy R, Bai H, Palli SR (2006) Mechanisms of midgut remodeling: juvenile hormone analog methoprene blocks midgut metamorphosis by modulating ecdysone action. Mech Dev 123:530–547
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Núcleo de Microscopia e Microanálise (NMM) Universidade Federal de Vicosa (UFV) for the use of their microscopy facility, including transmission and confocal microscopes, and for technical assistance. To the Molecular Systematics Laboratory, Department of Animal Biology, UFV, for the use of their epifluorescence microscope. This study was partially funded with a grant from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES/PVE 88881.030429/2013-01).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Gustavo Ferreira Martins and Marcelo Ramalho-Ortigão contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(PPTX 12274 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malta, J., Heerman, M., Weng, J.L. et al. Midgut morphological changes and autophagy during metamorphosis in sand flies. Cell Tissue Res 368, 513–529 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-017-2586-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-017-2586-z